Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729800692.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-06b, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800692
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 712K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 162K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 228K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748650535069

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-06b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 99 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Transformed 289 places.
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Transformed 644 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 289 places and 644 transitions and 3812 arcs in 191 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 44 out of 289 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 644/644 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 249 transition count 604
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 249 transition count 604
Ensure Unique test removed 144 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 144 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 249 transition count 460
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 232 place count 241 transition count 452
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 241 transition count 452
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 241 place count 240 transition count 451
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 240 transition count 451
Applied a total of 242 rules in 79 ms. Remains 240 /289 variables (removed 49) and now considering 451/644 (removed 193) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 451 rows 240 cols
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 21 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:15:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 220 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 480 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 450 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:15:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 167 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 151 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 136 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 10/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 16/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD377 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 451/691 variables, 240/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 142 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 128 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30688ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 30701ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/289 places, 449/644 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 239 transition count 449
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 239 /240 variables (removed 1) and now considering 449/449 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 449 rows 239 cols
[2025-05-31 00:16:07] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:16:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 168 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 239/289 places, 449/644 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 31530 ms. Remains : 239/289 places, 449/644 transitions.
Support contains 44 out of 239 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 00:16:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 449 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (168 resets) in 1685 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 7/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (75 resets) in 108 ms. (367 steps per ms) remains 4/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (72 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (79 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (76 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (75 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-05-31 00:16:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 202/208 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 31/239 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 449/688 variables, 239/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/688 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/688 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/688 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 688/688 variables, and 251 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 493 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 73/78 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 161/239 variables, 7/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 449/688 variables, 239/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/688 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/688 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/688 variables, 3/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/688 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/688 variables, 1/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/688 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/688 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 688/688 variables, and 260 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 1752 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2262ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 365 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 224 edges and 239 vertex of which 4 / 239 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 871 edges and 237 vertex of which 235 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 88 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 88 transitions
Performed 88 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 88
Iterating post reduction 0 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 235 transition count 355
Reduce places removed 88 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 23 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 23 transitions
Performed 23 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 1 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 147 transition count 316
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 124 transition count 316
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 124 transition count 310
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 118 transition count 310
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 114 transition count 306
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 114 transition count 306
Performed 52 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 62 transition count 254
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 62 transition count 253
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 379 place count 50 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 50 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 50 transition count 175
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 49 transition count 174
Free-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 49 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 42 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 41 transition count 166
Applied a total of 414 rules in 81 ms. Remains 41 /239 variables (removed 198) and now considering 166/449 (removed 283) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 81 ms. Remains : 41/239 places, 166/449 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 30700 steps (297 resets) in 251 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
Computed a total of 39 stabilizing places and 39 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 225 edges and 239 vertex of which 4 / 239 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 87 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 87 transitions
Performed 87 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 87
Iterating post reduction 0 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 236 transition count 359
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 149 transition count 322
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 127 transition count 322
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 127 transition count 316
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 121 transition count 316
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 116 transition count 311
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 116 transition count 311
Performed 51 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 65 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 65 transition count 258
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 371 place count 53 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 53 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 53 transition count 180
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 51 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 394 place count 49 transition count 176
Applied a total of 394 rules in 62 ms. Remains 49 /239 variables (removed 190) and now considering 176/449 (removed 273) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 49 cols
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned [45, 48]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/239 places, 176/449 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 45 transition count 174
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 45 /47 variables (removed 2) and now considering 174/176 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:16:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/239 places, 174/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 369 ms. Remains : 45/239 places, 174/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 12 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-00 finished in 606 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((X(p0)||(F((!p1||G(!p2))) U p3)))))'
Support contains 14 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 235 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 235 transition count 445
Applied a total of 8 rules in 9 ms. Remains 235 /239 variables (removed 4) and now considering 445/449 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 445 rows 235 cols
[2025-05-31 00:16:13] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:16:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 444 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:16:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 11/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 3/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30385ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30388ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/239 places, 445/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30668 ms. Remains : 235/239 places, 445/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 376 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND p3 p1 (NOT p0) p2), (AND p1 p2), (NOT p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 83 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-02 finished in 31071 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 223 edges and 239 vertex of which 4 / 239 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 85 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 85 transitions
Performed 85 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 85
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 236 transition count 361
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 151 transition count 324
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 129 transition count 324
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 129 transition count 318
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 123 transition count 318
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 247 place count 118 transition count 313
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 118 transition count 313
Performed 51 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 67 transition count 261
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 355 place count 67 transition count 260
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 367 place count 55 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 55 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 55 transition count 182
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 53 transition count 180
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 51 transition count 178
Applied a total of 390 rules in 59 ms. Remains 51 /239 variables (removed 188) and now considering 178/449 (removed 271) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 51 cols
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned [47, 50]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/239 places, 178/449 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 47 transition count 176
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 47 /49 variables (removed 2) and now considering 176/178 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 47 cols
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 47/239 places, 176/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 478 ms. Remains : 47/239 places, 176/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 12 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-03 finished in 567 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U (F(G(!p0))||((p0||G(p1)||F(G(!p0)))&&X(!p2))||G((p0||G(p1))))))'
Support contains 13 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 234 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 234 transition count 444
Applied a total of 10 rules in 9 ms. Remains 234 /239 variables (removed 5) and now considering 444/449 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 444 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 201 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 284 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 153 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 130 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 1/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 756 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60421ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60423ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60720 ms. Remains : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 173 ms :[false, p0, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), false]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 175 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6 reset in 190 ms.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 171 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[p0]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (105 resets) in 263 ms. (151 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 33308 steps (75 resets) in 92 ms. (358 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 210 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[p0]
Support contains 7 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 206 edges and 234 vertex of which 4 / 234 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 85 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 85 transitions
Performed 85 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 85
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 231 transition count 356
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 146 transition count 319
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 124 transition count 319
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 124 transition count 314
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 119 transition count 314
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 241 place count 118 transition count 313
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 118 transition count 313
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 72 transition count 266
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 72 transition count 265
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 343 place count 64 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 64 transition count 221
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 357 place count 64 transition count 215
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 62 transition count 213
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 60 transition count 211
Applied a total of 363 rules in 34 ms. Remains 60 /234 variables (removed 174) and now considering 211/444 (removed 233) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 60 cols
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned [56, 59]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/234 places, 211/444 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 56 transition count 209
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 56 /58 variables (removed 2) and now considering 209/211 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 209 rows 56 cols
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 56/234 places, 209/444 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 370 ms. Remains : 56/234 places, 209/444 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 72 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 52 ms :[p0]
RANDOM walk for 18948 steps (801 resets) in 662 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 99 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 42 ms :[p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 42 ms :[p0]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 64 reset in 90 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9 reset in 102 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15010578282118950341
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 209 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 7 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 209 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 209 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Built C files in 71ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15010578282118950341
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15010578282118950341;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 681 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15010578282118950341;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 48 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15010578282118950341;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased7879853300840310725.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 2891 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-04 finished in 66830 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(X(X(X(X(G(p0))))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 234 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 234 transition count 444
Applied a total of 10 rules in 7 ms. Remains 234 /239 variables (removed 5) and now considering 444/449 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 444 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-31 00:17:51] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:17:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 192 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 294 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:17:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 130 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 145 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30437ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30439ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30742 ms. Remains : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 376 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 57 reset in 110 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19 reset in 100 ms.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 96 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 369 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (170 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 38108 steps (70 resets) in 77 ms. (488 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 107 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 391 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 389 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 4 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 234 /234 variables (removed 0) and now considering 444/444 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 312 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 130 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 1/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 756 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60422ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60423ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60745 ms. Remains : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 90 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 348 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (290 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 31226 steps (59 resets) in 48 ms. (637 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 76 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 333 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 346 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 344 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3 reset in 93 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 100 reset in 109 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 387 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 4 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 219 edges and 234 vertex of which 4 / 234 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 85 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 232 transition count 442
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 232 transition count 427
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 232 transition count 427
Deduced a syphon composed of 104 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 232 transition count 427
Discarding 74 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 74 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 158 transition count 353
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 158 transition count 353
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -7
Deduced a syphon composed of 93 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 158 transition count 360
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 158 transition count 358
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 386 place count 104 transition count 244
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 104 transition count 244
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 104 transition count 232
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 458 place count 98 transition count 226
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 98 transition count 226
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 465 place count 98 transition count 226
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 467 place count 96 transition count 224
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 96 transition count 224
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -6
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 471 place count 96 transition count 230
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 471 rules in 46 ms. Remains 96 /234 variables (removed 138) and now considering 230/444 (removed 214) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 7 ms returned []
Running 229 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 230 rows 96 cols
[2025-05-31 00:19:27] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/96 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD128 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 13/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 41 solved, 188 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 41 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 41 solved, 188 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 229/325 variables, 96/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/326 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 326/326 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved in 15508 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 229/229 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 47/96 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 14/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 229/325 variables, 96/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 176/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 5/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/326 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 326/326 variables, and 304 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 176/229 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 45754ms problems are : Problem set: 53 solved, 176 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 53 dead transitions in 45755ms
Found 53 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 53 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 53 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/234 places, 177/444 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 466 edges and 96 vertex of which 50 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 46 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 46 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 50 /96 variables (removed 46) and now considering 177/177 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 50/234 places, 177/444 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 45823 ms. Remains : 50/234 places, 177/444 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16243537851004549046
[2025-05-31 00:20:13] [INFO ] Built C files in 14ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16243537851004549046
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16243537851004549046;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 777 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16243537851004549046;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16243537851004549046;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10118544163028828752.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 4 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 234 /234 variables (removed 0) and now considering 444/444 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 444 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-31 00:20:28] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:20:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 214 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:20:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 1/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 756 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60435ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60441ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60761 ms. Remains : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin17126641127280783703
[2025-05-31 00:21:29] [INFO ] Built C files in 7ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin17126641127280783703
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin17126641127280783703;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 749 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin17126641127280783703;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 30 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin17126641127280783703;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased4445736128407487555.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL3177803007219286633.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL17958622181963583714.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL3177803007219286633.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut9504241553975747677.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL17958622181963583714.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL17958622181963583714.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut9504241553975747677.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:21:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL3990324847850365893.gal : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2921009812563071986.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL3990324847850365893.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL2921009812563071986.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...275
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X(X(X(X(X(X(X(G("(((p6!=1)||(p17!=1))||((p213!=1)||(p246!=1)))")))))))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XXXXXXXXF!"(((p6!=1)||(p17!=1))||((p213!=1)||(p246!=1)))"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7756730492111910950.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7756730492111910950.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7756730492111910950.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7756730492111910950.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7756730492111910950.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 850 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 80 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL16903765475818194663.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL12395677961976751650.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL16903765475818194663.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL12395677961976751650.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...256
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X(X(X(X(X(X(X(G("(((u2.p6!=1)||(u2.p17!=1))||((i13.u65.p213!=1)||(u2.p246!=1)))")))))))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XXXXXXXXF!"(((u2.p6!=1)||(u2.p17!=1))||((i13.u65.p213!=1)||(u2.p246!=1)))"
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t224, t226, t231, t255, t279, t303, t345, t363, t446, i1.i1.t217, i1.i1.u13.t197, i1.i1.u20.t...805
Computing Next relation with stutter on 84736 deadlock states
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05 finished in 278575 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0&&F(p1)))))'
Support contains 14 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 234 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 234 transition count 444
Applied a total of 10 rules in 9 ms. Remains 234 /239 variables (removed 5) and now considering 444/449 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 194 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 305 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 154 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 139 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 143 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30417ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30419ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30735 ms. Remains : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 203 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-06 finished in 30956 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((X(X(p0)) U G(p1)) U X(((p2 U p3)||G(!p1)))))'
Support contains 10 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 236 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 236 transition count 446
Applied a total of 6 rules in 11 ms. Remains 236 /239 variables (removed 3) and now considering 446/449 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 446 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-31 00:23:01] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:23:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 189 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 285 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 445 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:23:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 11/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 446/682 variables, 236/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 682/682 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 445/445 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 56/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 446/682 variables, 236/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/682 variables, 445/753 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/682 variables, 2/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 682/682 variables, and 755 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 445/445 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60400ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60402ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/239 places, 446/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60701 ms. Remains : 236/239 places, 446/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 1004 ms :[(AND p1 (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)), (AND p1 (NOT p3)), false, (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), true, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND p1 p0), (NOT p3), (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19040 reset in 158 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19087 reset in 170 ms.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p3)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p3))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 29 factoid took 217 ms. Reduced automaton from 23 states, 74 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 27 states, 104 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 1241 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)), (AND p1 (NOT p3)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)), true, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND p1 p0), (NOT p3), (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 35 to 34
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (187 resets) in 366 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 13/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (74 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 11/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (87 resets) in 168 ms. (236 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (68 resets) in 117 ms. (339 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (37 resets) in 283 ms. (140 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (82 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (85 resets) in 362 ms. (110 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (76 resets) in 99 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (76 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (75 resets) in 58 ms. (678 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (85 resets) in 42 ms. (930 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (72 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
[2025-05-31 00:24:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Problem apf5 is UNSAT
Problem apf6 is UNSAT
Problem apf7 is UNSAT
Problem apf8 is UNSAT
Problem apf11 is UNSAT
Problem apf14 is UNSAT
Problem apf15 is UNSAT
Problem apf16 is UNSAT
Problem apf22 is UNSAT
Problem apf23 is UNSAT
Problem apf34 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 190/682 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 0 unsolved in 78 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 111ms problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 11 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p3)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p3))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X p1)), (G (OR p1 p2 p3 (NOT p0))), (G (OR p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3) (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3) (NOT p0))), (G (OR p1 (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3) p0)), (G (OR p1 p2 (NOT p3) (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3) (NOT p0))), (G (AND (OR p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)) (OR p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p0)))), (G (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p0))), (G (OR p1 (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 p3 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2) p3))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p3 (NOT p0)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 p3 p0))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 p3))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3 p0))), (F p3), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2) p3 p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p3))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p3))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3) p0)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3) p0)))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2) p3)))
Knowledge based reduction with 40 factoid took 340 ms. Reduced automaton from 27 states, 104 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-07 finished in 64662 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(p0) U ((X(p0)&&p1)||X(G(p0)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 234 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 234 transition count 444
Applied a total of 10 rules in 10 ms. Remains 234 /239 variables (removed 5) and now considering 444/449 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 444 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-31 00:24:05] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:24:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 193 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 295 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:24:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 1/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 756 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30033 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60403ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60405ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60711 ms. Remains : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33300 reset in 125 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33377 reset in 123 ms.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 111 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 85 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
RANDOM walk for 26191 steps (271 resets) in 85 ms. (304 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 228 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Support contains 5 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 234 /234 variables (removed 0) and now considering 444/444 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:25:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:25:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 216 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 304 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:25:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 136 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 68/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 2/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 758 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60397ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60400ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60713 ms. Remains : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 131 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
RANDOM walk for 17025 steps (171 resets) in 53 ms. (315 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 254 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33451 reset in 110 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33159 reset in 110 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Support contains 5 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 218 edges and 234 vertex of which 4 / 234 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 85 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 232 transition count 442
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 232 transition count 428
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 232 transition count 428
Deduced a syphon composed of 104 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 232 transition count 428
Discarding 75 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 75 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 157 transition count 353
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 157 transition count 353
Performed 61 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -6
Deduced a syphon composed of 91 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 157 transition count 359
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 157 transition count 357
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 385 place count 104 transition count 244
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 104 transition count 244
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 104 transition count 233
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 454 place count 99 transition count 228
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 99 transition count 228
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 460 place count 99 transition count 228
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 462 place count 97 transition count 226
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 97 transition count 226
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -6
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 97 transition count 232
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 466 rules in 35 ms. Remains 97 /234 variables (removed 137) and now considering 232/444 (removed 212) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 231 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 232 rows 97 cols
[2025-05-31 00:26:09] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 13/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 41 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 41 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 41 solved, 190 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 231/328 variables, 97/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 4/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/329 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/329 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 329/329 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved in 13041 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 231/231 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 47/97 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 14/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 231/328 variables, 97/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 178/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 5/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/329 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/329 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 329/329 variables, and 307 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 178/231 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 43291ms problems are : Problem set: 53 solved, 178 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 53 dead transitions in 43292ms
Found 53 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 53 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 53 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/234 places, 179/444 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 468 edges and 97 vertex of which 51 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 46 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 46 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 51 /97 variables (removed 46) and now considering 179/179 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/234 places, 179/444 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 43350 ms. Remains : 51/234 places, 179/444 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15799568622566006097
[2025-05-31 00:26:52] [INFO ] Built C files in 11ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15799568622566006097
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15799568622566006097;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 769 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15799568622566006097;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 39 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15799568622566006097;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5763738680574166848.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 125 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-08 finished in 168075 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 225 edges and 239 vertex of which 4 / 239 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 87 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 87 transitions
Performed 87 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 87
Iterating post reduction 0 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 236 transition count 359
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 149 transition count 322
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 127 transition count 322
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 127 transition count 316
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 121 transition count 316
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 116 transition count 311
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 116 transition count 311
Performed 51 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 65 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 65 transition count 258
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 371 place count 53 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 53 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 53 transition count 180
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 51 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 394 place count 49 transition count 176
Applied a total of 394 rules in 43 ms. Remains 49 /239 variables (removed 190) and now considering 176/449 (removed 273) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 49 cols
[2025-05-31 00:26:53] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:26:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:26:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned [45, 48]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/239 places, 176/449 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 45 transition count 174
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 45 /47 variables (removed 2) and now considering 174/176 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-31 00:26:53] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:26:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:26:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/239 places, 174/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 337 ms. Remains : 45/239 places, 174/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 41 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 22 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-10 finished in 391 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((p0&&F(((X(!p1)&&F(p2))||G(!p1)))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 235 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 235 transition count 445
Applied a total of 8 rules in 12 ms. Remains 235 /239 variables (removed 4) and now considering 445/449 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 445 rows 235 cols
[2025-05-31 00:26:54] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:26:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 217 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 321 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 444 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:26:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 131 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 127 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 19/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 3/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/680 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 444/444 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 65/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 4/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 445/680 variables, 235/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/680 variables, 444/759 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/680 variables, 1/760 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 680/680 variables, and 760 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 444/444 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60423ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60425ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/239 places, 445/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60761 ms. Remains : 235/239 places, 445/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 200 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (OR (NOT p0) p1), true, p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-12 finished in 60986 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 226 edges and 239 vertex of which 4 / 239 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 86 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 86 transitions
Performed 86 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 86
Iterating post reduction 0 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 236 transition count 360
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 123 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 150 transition count 323
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 128 transition count 322
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 127 transition count 322
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 127 transition count 314
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 119 transition count 314
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 114 transition count 309
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 114 transition count 309
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 65 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 65 transition count 258
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 372 place count 52 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 5 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 385 place count 52 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 52 transition count 173
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 50 transition count 171
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 48 transition count 169
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 47 transition count 169
Applied a total of 398 rules in 25 ms. Remains 47 /239 variables (removed 192) and now considering 169/449 (removed 280) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 47 cols
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/239 places, 169/449 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 168
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 168/169 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/239 places, 168/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 315 ms. Remains : 45/239 places, 168/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 41 steps with 5 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-13 finished in 410 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(G(p0)))))'
Support contains 1 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 234 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 234 transition count 444
Applied a total of 10 rules in 9 ms. Remains 234 /239 variables (removed 5) and now considering 444/449 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 444 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 233 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 342 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:27:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 144 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/757 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 759 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60446ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60450ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60803 ms. Remains : 234/239 places, 444/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 173 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-14 finished in 60990 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||(p1&&G(F(p1))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 220 edges and 239 vertex of which 4 / 239 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 86 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 86 transitions
Performed 86 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 86
Iterating post reduction 0 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 236 transition count 360
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 123 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 150 transition count 323
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 128 transition count 323
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 128 transition count 316
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 121 transition count 316
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 250 place count 117 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 117 transition count 312
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 68 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 68 transition count 261
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 364 place count 57 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 57 transition count 196
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 57 transition count 190
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 385 place count 55 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 54 transition count 187
Applied a total of 386 rules in 47 ms. Remains 54 /239 variables (removed 185) and now considering 187/449 (removed 262) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 54 cols
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned [50, 53]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/239 places, 187/449 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 50 transition count 185
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 50 /52 variables (removed 2) and now considering 185/187 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 50 cols
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:28:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 50/239 places, 185/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 363 ms. Remains : 50/239 places, 185/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 61 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 54 reset in 41 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 28 reset in 51 ms.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 83 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 13197 steps (648 resets) in 49 ms. (263 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 239 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 5 out of 50 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 185/185 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 185/185 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:28:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:28:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:28:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 19 ms returned []
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:28:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 00:28:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 184/234 variables, 50/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 8919 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 184/234 variables, 50/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 183/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 249 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 28656 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 37863ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37864ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38048 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 185/185 transitions.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 104 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 6927 steps (357 resets) in 30 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 177 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 63 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 77 reset in 47 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1 reset in 57 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13628414751537314852
[2025-05-31 00:29:36] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 185 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:29:36] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:29:36] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 185 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:29:36] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:29:36] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 185 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:29:36] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:29:36] [INFO ] Built C files in 25ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13628414751537314852
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13628414751537314852;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 482 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13628414751537314852;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13628414751537314852;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased787892338546309691.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 5 out of 50 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 185/185 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 185/185 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:29:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:29:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:29:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:29:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 00:29:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 184/234 variables, 50/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 8710 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 184/234 variables, 50/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 183/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 249 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 28371 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 37351ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37351ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37548 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 185/185 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15212686560251182665
[2025-05-31 00:30:29] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 185 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:30:29] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:30:29] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 185 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:30:29] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:30:29] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 185 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:30:29] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:30:29] [INFO ] Built C files in 21ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15212686560251182665
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15212686560251182665;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 518 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15212686560251182665;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 43 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15212686560251182665;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15928458428916343416.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-31 00:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 00:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL6762385995379526156.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2754122592901513466.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL6762385995379526156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut4114762346776414908.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL2754122592901513466.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...317
Loading property file /tmp/LTL2754122592901513466.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut4114762346776414908.hoa
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t64, t67, t69, t71, t92, t96, t118, t122, t144, t149, t171, t176, t198, t202, t51.t382, t51.t...2498
Computing Next relation with stutter on 10795 deadlock states
19 unique states visited
19 strongly connected components in search stack
20 transitions explored
19 items max in DFS search stack
1286 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,12.9049,261100,1,0,533,845116,409,251,7584,802520,639
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE HOA DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-15 finished in 121561 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(X(X(X(X(G(p0))))))))))'
Found a Lengthening insensitive property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 368 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 4 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 224 edges and 239 vertex of which 4 / 239 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 87 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 87 transitions
Performed 87 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 87
Iterating post reduction 0 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 236 transition count 359
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 149 transition count 322
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 127 transition count 322
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 127 transition count 316
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 121 transition count 316
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 116 transition count 311
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 116 transition count 311
Performed 51 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 65 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 65 transition count 258
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 371 place count 53 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 53 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 53 transition count 180
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 51 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 49 transition count 176
Applied a total of 395 rules in 27 ms. Remains 49 /239 variables (removed 190) and now considering 176/449 (removed 273) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 49 cols
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned [45, 48]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/239 places, 176/449 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 45 transition count 174
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /47 variables (removed 2) and now considering 174/176 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:30:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/239 places, 174/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 310 ms. Remains : 45/239 places, 174/449 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1 reset in 64 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 147 reset in 96 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 87 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 351 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 32959 steps (1923 resets) in 83 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 79 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 398 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 381 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 4 out of 45 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 174/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 174/174 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:31:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:31:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:31:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:31:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 00:31:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 173/218 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 8704 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 173/218 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 172/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 22946 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 31898ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31916ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32064 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 174/174 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 94 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 403 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 35556 steps (1995 resets) in 95 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 96 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 11 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 383 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 399 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 364 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 130 reset in 63 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25 reset in 65 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 388 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 4 out of 45 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 174/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 174/174 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:31:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 00:31:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 173/218 variables, 45/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 8794 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 173/218 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 172/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 23124 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 32152ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32154ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32186 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 174/174 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin14068999651937777381
[2025-05-31 00:32:07] [INFO ] Built C files in 4ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin14068999651937777381
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14068999651937777381;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 363 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14068999651937777381;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin14068999651937777381;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased2128708182286193566.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 1109 ms.
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05 finished in 70501 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES LENGTHENING_INSENSITIVE
[2025-05-31 00:32:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
All properties solved without resorting to exhaustive model-checking.
Total runtime 992348 ms.

BK_STOP 1748651528646

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-06b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-06b, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800692"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-06b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-06b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;