Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729800691.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-06b, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800691
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 712K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 162K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 228K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748650466730

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-06b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 00:14:27] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 00:14:27] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 00:14:28] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 124 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:28] [INFO ] Transformed 289 places.
[2025-05-31 00:14:28] [INFO ] Transformed 644 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:14:28] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 00:14:28] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 289 places and 644 transitions and 3812 arcs in 235 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 11 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 24 out of 289 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 644/644 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 253 transition count 608
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 253 transition count 608
Ensure Unique test removed 144 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 144 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 253 transition count 464
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 225 place count 244 transition count 455
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 244 transition count 455
Applied a total of 234 rules in 85 ms. Remains 244 /289 variables (removed 45) and now considering 455/644 (removed 189) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 455 rows 244 cols
[2025-05-31 00:14:28] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 35 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 323 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:14:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 381 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 737 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 454 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:14:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/244 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 223 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 191 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 121 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 138 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 9/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 454 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD381 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 455/699 variables, 244/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 699/699 variables, and 324 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 454/454 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/244 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 69/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 6/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 455/699 variables, 244/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/699 variables, 452/787 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 699/699 variables, and 791 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 452/454 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60649ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 452 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 60662ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 244/289 places, 453/644 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 243 transition count 453
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 243 /244 variables (removed 1) and now considering 453/453 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 453 rows 243 cols
[2025-05-31 00:15:29] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:15:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 232 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 321 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 243/289 places, 453/644 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61841 ms. Remains : 243/289 places, 453/644 transitions.
Support contains 24 out of 243 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 127 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 453 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (121 resets) in 823 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 2/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (62 resets) in 117 ms. (338 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (67 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-05-31 00:15:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 82/86 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 157/243 variables, 7/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 453/696 variables, 243/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/696 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 696/696 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 202 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 82/86 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 157/243 variables, 7/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 453/696 variables, 243/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 1/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/696 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 696/696 variables, and 261 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1195 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1409ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 188 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 223 edges and 243 vertex of which 4 / 243 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 875 edges and 241 vertex of which 238 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 89 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 89 transitions
Performed 89 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 89
Iterating post reduction 0 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 238 transition count 357
Reduce places removed 89 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 149 transition count 320
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 127 transition count 320
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 127 transition count 314
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 121 transition count 314
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 257 place count 117 transition count 310
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 117 transition count 310
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 262 place count 116 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 116 transition count 304
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 116 transition count 302
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 115 transition count 302
Performed 50 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 65 transition count 252
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 65 transition count 251
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 378 place count 54 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 6 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 54 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 394 place count 54 transition count 180
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 53 transition count 179
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 53 transition count 178
Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 53 transition count 170
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 45 transition count 170
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 45 transition count 170
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 44 transition count 169
Applied a total of 415 rules in 102 ms. Remains 44 /243 variables (removed 199) and now considering 169/453 (removed 284) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 44/243 places, 169/453 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (337 resets) in 203 ms. (196 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (351 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 2293721 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 2161 ms. (steps per millisecond=1061 )
Probabilistic random walk after 2293721 steps, saw 320347 distinct states, run finished after 2165 ms. (steps per millisecond=1059 ) properties seen :1
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(X(p0))&&G(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 238 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 238 transition count 448
Applied a total of 10 rules in 10 ms. Remains 238 /243 variables (removed 5) and now considering 448/453 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 448 rows 238 cols
[2025-05-31 00:15:35] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:15:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 244 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 350 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 447 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:15:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 141 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 133 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 16/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/686 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 447/447 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 48/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 448/686 variables, 238/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/686 variables, 447/744 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/686 variables, 11/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 686/686 variables, and 755 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 447/447 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60445ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 447 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60450ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/243 places, 448/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60813 ms. Remains : 238/243 places, 448/453 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 342 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 61236 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((F(p1)&&p0))))'
Support contains 3 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 236 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 236 transition count 446
Applied a total of 14 rules in 10 ms. Remains 236 /243 variables (removed 7) and now considering 446/453 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 446 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-31 00:16:36] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:16:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 223 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 445 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:16:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 7/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/682 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 445/445 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 71/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 446/682 variables, 236/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/682 variables, 445/766 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/682 variables, 1/767 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 682/682 variables, and 767 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 445/445 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60387ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60390ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/243 places, 446/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60733 ms. Remains : 236/243 places, 446/453 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 138 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 60888 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 228 edges and 243 vertex of which 4 / 243 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 91 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 91 transitions
Performed 91 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 91
Iterating post reduction 0 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 240 transition count 359
Reduce places removed 91 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 1 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 149 transition count 324
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 128 transition count 324
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 128 transition count 316
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 120 transition count 316
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 116 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 116 transition count 312
Performed 50 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 66 transition count 261
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 66 transition count 260
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 376 place count 54 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 54 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 54 transition count 182
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 52 transition count 180
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 52 transition count 180
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 50 transition count 178
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 49 transition count 178
Applied a total of 401 rules in 59 ms. Remains 49 /243 variables (removed 194) and now considering 178/453 (removed 275) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 49 cols
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned [45, 48]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/243 places, 178/453 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 45 transition count 176
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 45 /47 variables (removed 2) and now considering 176/178 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/243 places, 176/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 364 ms. Remains : 45/243 places, 176/453 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 31 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 408 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(p0))'
Support contains 4 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 234 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 234 transition count 444
Applied a total of 18 rules in 10 ms. Remains 234 /243 variables (removed 9) and now considering 444/453 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 444 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:17:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 230 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 336 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:17:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 145 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 1/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 756 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60407ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60409ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/243 places, 444/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60757 ms. Remains : 234/243 places, 444/453 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 237 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 130 ms.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 15 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 61251 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X((p0&&F(p1))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 234 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 234 transition count 444
Applied a total of 18 rules in 8 ms. Remains 234 /243 variables (removed 9) and now considering 444/453 (removed 9) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 213 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 321 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:18:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 1/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 756 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60420ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60422ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/243 places, 444/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60753 ms. Remains : 234/243 places, 444/453 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 205 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 234 steps with 2 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 60975 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0||(p1&&X(p1))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 234 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 234 transition count 444
Applied a total of 18 rules in 13 ms. Remains 234 /243 variables (removed 9) and now considering 444/453 (removed 9) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:19:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:19:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 211 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 315 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:19:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 1/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 756 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60414ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60416ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/243 places, 444/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60746 ms. Remains : 234/243 places, 444/453 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 113 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 12 reset in 111 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 14 reset in 191 ms.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 84 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (155 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 1/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 14965 steps (27 resets) in 44 ms. (332 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 185 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 103 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 124 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 2 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 234 /234 variables (removed 0) and now considering 444/444 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:20:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:20:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 218 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:20:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 143 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 1/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 756 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60399ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60401ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60720 ms. Remains : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 96 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 24407 steps (176 resets) in 51 ms. (469 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 240 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 121 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 125 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 65 reset in 87 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22 reset in 192 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin17983527310687995597
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Built C files in 22ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin17983527310687995597
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin17983527310687995597;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 886 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin17983527310687995597;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 54 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin17983527310687995597;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased2031163475839142740.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 2 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 234 /234 variables (removed 0) and now considering 444/444 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:21:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:21:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 206 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 318 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 443 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:21:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 130 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 146 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 timeout
0.0)
(s17 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 678/678 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 444/678 variables, 234/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 443/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 1/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 678/678 variables, and 756 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/443 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60407ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 443 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60409ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60732 ms. Remains : 234/234 places, 444/444 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin4306748693898468938
[2025-05-31 00:22:59] [INFO ] Built C files in 7ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin4306748693898468938
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4306748693898468938;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 735 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4306748693898468938;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 37 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin4306748693898468938;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased12470978132452079342.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-31 00:23:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL10218258748391145732.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL11429919487870722819.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL10218258748391145732.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut1526806131949545051.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL11429919487870722819.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...319
Loading property file /tmp/LTL11429919487870722819.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut1526806131949545051.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL8242546895857437806.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL426638538715848956.ltl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL8242546895857437806.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL426638538715848956.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...274
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F(("(p51!=1)")||(("(p101!=1)")&&(X("(p101!=1)")))))))
Formula 0 simplified : FG(!"(p51!=1)" & (!"(p101!=1)" | X!"(p101!=1)"))
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9477338515766629397.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9477338515766629397.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9477338515766629397.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9477338515766629397.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9477338515766629397.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 836 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 96 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 34 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL18021857803246907681.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL1985718084911686924.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL18021857803246907681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL1985718084911686924.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F(("(i2.i1.u15.p51!=1)")||(("(i4.i0.u29.p101!=1)")&&(X("(i4.i0.u29.p101!=1)")))))))
Formula 0 simplified : FG(!"(i2.i1.u15.p51!=1)" & (!"(i4.i0.u29.p101!=1)" | X!"(i4.i0.u29.p101!=1)"))
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t228, t230, t239, t263, t281, t311, t347, t450, i0.u65.t33, i0.u65.t36, i0.u65.t37, i0.u65.t3...805
Computing Next relation with stutter on 84736 deadlock states
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 260710 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 235 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 235 transition count 445
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 235 /243 variables (removed 8) and now considering 445/453 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 445 rows 235 cols
[2025-05-31 00:24:00] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:24:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 210 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 343 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 444 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:24:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 139 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 8/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 445/680 variables, 235/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 680/680 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 444/444 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 54/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 445/680 variables, 235/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/680 variables, 444/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/680 variables, 6/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 680/680 variables, and 751 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 444/444 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60419ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 444 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60421ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/243 places, 445/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60771 ms. Remains : 235/243 places, 445/453 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 60877 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 229 edges and 243 vertex of which 4 / 243 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 92 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 92 transitions
Performed 92 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 92
Iterating post reduction 0 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 240 transition count 358
Reduce places removed 92 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 129 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 148 transition count 321
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 126 transition count 321
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 126 transition count 314
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 119 transition count 314
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 263 place count 114 transition count 309
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 114 transition count 309
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 113 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 113 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 113 transition count 301
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 112 transition count 301
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 65 transition count 253
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 65 transition count 252
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 379 place count 54 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 6 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 54 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 54 transition count 181
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 52 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 50 transition count 177
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 49 transition count 177
Applied a total of 402 rules in 48 ms. Remains 49 /243 variables (removed 194) and now considering 177/453 (removed 276) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 49 cols
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned [45, 48]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/243 places, 177/453 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 45 transition count 175
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 45 /47 variables (removed 2) and now considering 175/177 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:25:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/243 places, 175/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 349 ms. Remains : 45/243 places, 175/453 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20 reset in 88 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 235 reset in 76 ms.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 66 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 58 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 467 steps (26 resets) in 9 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 123 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 45 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 175/175 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 175/175 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:25:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned []
Running 174 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 00:25:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 174/219 variables, 45/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/220 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 12345 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 174/219 variables, 45/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 174/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 4/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/220 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved in 25697 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 38265ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 174 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38267ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38461 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 175/175 transitions.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 68 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 927 steps (57 resets) in 18 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 107 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 45 reset in 49 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 117 reset in 72 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6436700964459861319
[2025-05-31 00:25:41] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 175 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:25:41] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:25:41] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 175 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:25:41] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:25:41] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 175 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:25:41] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:25:41] [INFO ] Built C files in 33ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6436700964459861319
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6436700964459861319;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 447 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6436700964459861319;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 30 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6436700964459861319;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased14334427419797943538.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 1648 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 42306 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p1)||p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 236 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 236 transition count 446
Applied a total of 14 rules in 10 ms. Remains 236 /243 variables (removed 7) and now considering 446/453 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 446 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-31 00:25:43] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:25:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 229 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 337 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 445 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:25:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 9/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/682 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 445/445 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 60/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 10/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 446/682 variables, 236/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/682 variables, 445/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 682/682 variables, and 764 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 445/445 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60407ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60409ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/243 places, 446/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60759 ms. Remains : 236/243 places, 446/453 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 189 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 193 ms.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-15 finished in 61265 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0||(p1&&X(p1))))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-07
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 2 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 453/453 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 229 edges and 243 vertex of which 4 / 243 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 91 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 91 transitions
Performed 91 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 91
Iterating post reduction 0 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 240 transition count 359
Reduce places removed 91 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 1 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 149 transition count 322
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 127 transition count 322
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 127 transition count 315
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 120 transition count 315
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 261 place count 115 transition count 310
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 115 transition count 310
Performed 50 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 65 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 65 transition count 258
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 378 place count 54 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 54 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 54 transition count 187
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 52 transition count 185
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 52 transition count 185
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 50 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 49 transition count 183
Applied a total of 401 rules in 41 ms. Remains 49 /243 variables (removed 194) and now considering 183/453 (removed 270) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 49 cols
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned [45, 48]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/243 places, 183/453 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 45 transition count 181
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 45 /47 variables (removed 2) and now considering 181/183 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/243 places, 181/453 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 319 ms. Remains : 45/243 places, 181/453 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 21 reset in 47 ms.
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 51 steps with 3 reset in 0 ms.
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 566 ms.
Length sensitive decision was in the wrong direction : Shortening insensitive + false
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin17647845734056231301
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 453 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 10 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 453 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13102947354200877777.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13102947354200877777.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13102947354200877777.weights'
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 453 transitions.
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13102947354200877777.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13102947354200877777.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 30 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Built C files in 124ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin17647845734056231301
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin17647845734056231301;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '720' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 843 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLCardinality13515235397652082162.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:26:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLCardinality1478715260550977127.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLCardinality13515235397652082162.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLCardinality1478715260550977127.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F(("(i2.i1.u15.p51!=1)")||(("(i7.i0.u30.p101!=1)")&&(X("(i7.i0.u30.p101!=1)")))))))
Formula 0 simplified : FG(!"(i2.i1.u15.p51!=1)" & (!"(i7.i0.u30.p101!=1)" | X!"(i7.i0.u30.p101!=1)"))
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t228, t230, t287, t305, t371, t450, i0.u77.t33, i0.u77.t36, i0.u77.t37, i0.u77.t38, i2.i1.t22...848
Computing Next relation with stutter on 84736 deadlock states
Compilation finished in 1150 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin17647845734056231301;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 37 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin17647845734056231301;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '[](<>(((LTLAPp0==true)||((LTLAPp1==true)&&X((LTLAPp1==true))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
404 unique states visited
404 strongly connected components in search stack
405 transitions explored
404 items max in DFS search stack
2018 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,20.2188,421260,1,0,955641,4321,4564,1.17628e+06,459,42179,1260013
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 788037 ms.

BK_STOP 1748651256044

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-06b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-06b, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800691"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-06b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-06b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;