Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729800676.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-05b, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800676
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748649710284

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 00:01:51] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 00:01:51] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 00:01:51] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 85 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:51] [INFO ] Transformed 255 places.
[2025-05-31 00:01:51] [INFO ] Transformed 490 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:01:51] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 00:01:51] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 255 places and 490 transitions and 2527 arcs in 169 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 36 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 490/490 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 222 transition count 457
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 222 transition count 457
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 216 transition count 451
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 216 transition count 451
Applied a total of 78 rules in 64 ms. Remains 216 /255 variables (removed 39) and now considering 451/490 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 451 rows 216 cols
[2025-05-31 00:01:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:01:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 206 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 462 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 450 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:01:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/216 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 13/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 450 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD409 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 451/667 variables, 216/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/667 variables, 1/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 667/667 variables, and 281 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved in 30171 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 450/450 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/216 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 55/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 451/667 variables, 216/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/667 variables, 448/729 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 84 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 82 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 667/667 variables, and 733 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 448/450 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 60895ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 448 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 60907ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 216/255 places, 449/490 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 215 transition count 449
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 215 /216 variables (removed 1) and now considering 449/449 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 449 rows 215 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:53] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 215/255 places, 449/490 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61691 ms. Remains : 215/255 places, 449/490 transitions.
Support contains 36 out of 215 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 449 transitions.
Support contains 35 out of 215 places (down from 36) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (77 resets) in 1703 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 7/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (69 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 4/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (72 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (56 resets) in 62 ms. (634 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 98/103 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 112/215 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 179 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 449/664 variables, 215/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/664 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/664 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/664 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/664 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 664/664 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 754 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 215/215 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 98/103 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 112/215 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 449/664 variables, 215/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/664 variables, 2/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/664 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/664 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/664 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/664 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 664/664 variables, and 232 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 766 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 215/215 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1530ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 221 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 198 edges and 215 vertex of which 2 / 215 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 716 edges and 214 vertex of which 213 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 84 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 84 transitions
Performed 84 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 84
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 213 transition count 362
Reduce places removed 84 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 1 with 115 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 129 transition count 331
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 111 transition count 331
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 111 transition count 324
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 104 transition count 324
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 237 place count 101 transition count 321
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 101 transition count 321
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 101 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 341 place count 100 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 100 transition count 220
Performed 45 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 432 place count 55 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 55 transition count 173
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 442 place count 46 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 46 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 46 transition count 119
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 45 transition count 118
Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 45 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 470 place count 39 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 471 place count 38 transition count 111
Applied a total of 471 rules in 81 ms. Remains 38 /215 variables (removed 177) and now considering 111/449 (removed 338) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 81 ms. Remains : 38/215 places, 111/449 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (23 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (444 resets) in 25 ms. (1538 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 38 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 12/16 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 94/110 variables, 16/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/145 variables, 20/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 5/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/147 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/149 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 49 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 79 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 12/16 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 94/110 variables, 16/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/145 variables, 20/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 5/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 2/147 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 2/149 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 273 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 362ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 8 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 38 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 111/111 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 16 edges and 38 vertex of which 2 / 38 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 328 edges and 37 vertex of which 36 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 36 /38 variables (removed 2) and now considering 109/111 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 12 ms. Remains : 36/38 places, 109/111 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 14950 steps (245 resets) in 51 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(p0) U X((F(p1) U G(p2)))) U p3))'
Support contains 7 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 208 transition count 442
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 208 transition count 442
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 118 rules in 11 ms. Remains 206 /215 variables (removed 9) and now considering 340/449 (removed 109) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60271ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60273ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/215 places, 340/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60525 ms. Remains : 206/215 places, 340/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 296 ms :[(NOT p3), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 164 steps with 1 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-02 finished in 60903 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(((X(X(X(F(p0))))&&F(p1)) U p2))))'
Support contains 3 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 211 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 211 transition count 445
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 209 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 209 transition count 443
Applied a total of 12 rules in 11 ms. Remains 209 /215 variables (removed 6) and now considering 443/449 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 443 rows 209 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:57] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 374 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 442 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 13/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 4/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 443/652 variables, 209/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/652 variables, 2/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 652/652 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 442/442 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 59/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 443/652 variables, 209/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/652 variables, 442/722 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 652/652 variables, and 722 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 442/442 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60558ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 442 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60559ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 209/215 places, 443/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60946 ms. Remains : 209/215 places, 443/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 245 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 106 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-03 finished in 61212 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 199 edges and 215 vertex of which 4 / 215 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 84 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 84 transitions
Performed 84 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 84
Iterating post reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 212 transition count 362
Reduce places removed 84 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 1 with 115 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 128 transition count 331
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 110 transition count 331
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 110 transition count 325
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 104 transition count 325
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 100 transition count 321
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 100 transition count 321
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 100 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 339 place count 99 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 99 transition count 220
Performed 43 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 56 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 427 place count 56 transition count 175
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 435 place count 48 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 443 place count 48 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 447 place count 48 transition count 127
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 47 transition count 126
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 47 transition count 126
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 45 transition count 124
Applied a total of 452 rules in 48 ms. Remains 45 /215 variables (removed 170) and now considering 124/449 (removed 325) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned [41, 44]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/215 places, 124/449 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 41 transition count 122
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 41 /43 variables (removed 2) and now considering 122/124 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 41 cols
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 41/215 places, 122/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 289 ms. Remains : 41/215 places, 122/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-04 finished in 407 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((F(G(p0))||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 208 transition count 442
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 208 transition count 442
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 118 rules in 11 ms. Remains 206 /215 variables (removed 9) and now considering 340/449 (removed 109) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:04:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 1.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60190ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60191ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/215 places, 340/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60430 ms. Remains : 206/215 places, 340/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 53 reset in 151 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4 reset in 114 ms.
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 69 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 133 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (105 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 32377 steps (75 resets) in 79 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 102 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 133 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 137 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 4 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 340/340 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 340/340 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:06:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:06:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 219 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:06:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60161ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60163ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60387 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 340/340 transitions.
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 70 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (170 resets) in 73 ms. (540 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 23705 steps (56 resets) in 20 ms. (1128 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 117 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 143 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 132 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 42 reset in 116 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 26 reset in 111 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 4 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 340/340 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 193 edges and 206 vertex of which 4 / 206 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 204 transition count 338
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 204 transition count 325
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 204 transition count 325
Deduced a syphon composed of 93 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 204 transition count 325
Discarding 66 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 66 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 138 transition count 259
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 138 transition count 259
Performed 53 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -5
Deduced a syphon composed of 81 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 138 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 138 transition count 262
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 341 place count 91 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 91 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 91 transition count 166
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 400 place count 87 transition count 162
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 87 transition count 162
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 87 transition count 162
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 407 place count 85 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 85 transition count 160
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -6
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 85 transition count 166
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 411 rules in 41 ms. Remains 85 /206 variables (removed 121) and now considering 166/340 (removed 174) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 165 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 85 cols
[2025-05-31 00:07:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD163 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD165 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 129 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/250 variables, 85/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/251 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 251/251 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved in 8056 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 85/85 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 42/85 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 13/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 165/250 variables, 85/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 117/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/251 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/251 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 251/251 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved in 15127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 85/85 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/165 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 23273ms problems are : Problem set: 48 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 48 dead transitions in 23273ms
Found 48 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 48 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 48 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/206 places, 118/340 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 357 edges and 85 vertex of which 44 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 41 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 41 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 12 ms. Remains 44 /85 variables (removed 41) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/206 places, 118/340 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 23335 ms. Remains : 44/206 places, 118/340 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin12067055811349318494
[2025-05-31 00:07:26] [INFO ] Built C files in 24ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin12067055811349318494
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12067055811349318494;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 638 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12067055811349318494;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 41 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin12067055811349318494;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9114479023806041365.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 4 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 340/340 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 340/340 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:07:41] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:07:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:07:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 150 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60178ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60179ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60406 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 340/340 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1598392532588963288
[2025-05-31 00:08:41] [INFO ] Built C files in 6ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1598392532588963288
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1598392532588963288;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 520 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1598392532588963288;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 35 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1598392532588963288;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased17805157792797137510.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL3275445135788642661.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL1381863135977205194.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL3275445135788642661.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut13224240001372645815.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL1381863135977205194.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL1381863135977205194.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut13224240001372645815.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:09:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL12064367472287828587.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL14426476803516403775.ltl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL12064367472287828587.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL14426476803516403775.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X((F(G("(((p6!=1)||(p16!=1))||((p48!=1)||(p212!=1)))")))||(G("(((p6==0)||(p16==0))||((p48==0)||(p212==0)))"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XX(GF!"(((p6!=1)||(p16!=1))||((p48!=1)||(p212!=1)))" & F!"(((p6==0)||(p16==0))||((p48==0)||(p212==0)))")
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph66610382990225515.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph66610382990225515.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph66610382990225515.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph66610382990225515.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph66610382990225515.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL12830641675540368419.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL14648577314315160632.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL12830641675540368419.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL14648577314315160632.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...256
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X((F(G("(((i0.u1.p6!=1)||(i0.u1.p16!=1))||((i3.i1.u14.p48!=1)||(i0.u1.p212!=1)))")))||(G("(((i0.u1.p6==0)||(i0.u1.p16==0))||((i3....195
Formula 0 simplified : XX(GF!"(((i0.u1.p6!=1)||(i0.u1.p16!=1))||((i3.i1.u14.p48!=1)||(i0.u1.p212!=1)))" & F!"(((i0.u1.p6==0)||(i0.u1.p16==0))||((i3.i1.u14....183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t201, t205, t245, t315, t345, t395, t446, i0.t199, i2.u15.t176, i2.u15.t179, i2.u16.t177, i3....712
Computing Next relation with stutter on 17888 deadlock states
262 unique states visited
262 strongly connected components in search stack
263 transitions explored
262 items max in DFS search stack
1481 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,14.8397,424304,1,0,845857,3397,3342,1.10012e+06,419,21171,1212280
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-05 finished in 282856 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 202 edges and 215 vertex of which 4 / 215 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 83 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 83 transitions
Performed 83 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 83
Iterating post reduction 0 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 212 transition count 363
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 1 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 129 transition count 332
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 111 transition count 332
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 111 transition count 326
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 105 transition count 326
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 232 place count 101 transition count 322
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 101 transition count 322
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 101 transition count 222
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 101 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 100 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 339 place count 99 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 99 transition count 220
Performed 44 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 55 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 429 place count 55 transition count 174
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 439 place count 45 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 45 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 454 place count 45 transition count 114
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 44 transition count 113
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 42 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 41 transition count 111
Applied a total of 459 rules in 33 ms. Remains 41 /215 variables (removed 174) and now considering 111/449 (removed 338) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 41 cols
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned [37, 40]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/215 places, 111/449 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 39 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 38 transition count 110
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 37 transition count 109
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 37 /39 variables (removed 2) and now considering 109/111 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 37 cols
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/215 places, 109/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 264 ms. Remains : 37/215 places, 109/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 30 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 15 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-07 finished in 315 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F((F(p1)&&p0))||X(X(p2))))'
Support contains 12 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 209 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 209 transition count 443
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 207 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 207 transition count 441
Applied a total of 16 rules in 20 ms. Remains 207 /215 variables (removed 8) and now considering 441/449 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 441 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 440 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 5/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 9/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 441/648 variables, 207/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 648/648 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 440/440 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 54/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 441/648 variables, 207/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/648 variables, 440/715 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 648/648 variables, and 716 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 440/440 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60524ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60526ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/215 places, 441/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60779 ms. Remains : 207/215 places, 441/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 317 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 112 steps with 4 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-08 finished in 61119 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0||X(p0)) U (G((p0||X(p0)))||(p1&&(p0||X(p0))&&G(p2)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 209 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 209 transition count 443
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 208 transition count 342
Applied a total of 114 rules in 17 ms. Remains 208 /215 variables (removed 7) and now considering 342/449 (removed 107) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 342 rows 208 cols
[2025-05-31 00:10:43] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:10:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 341 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:10:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 9/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 1/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 5/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 550/550 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 341/341 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 53/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 341/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 1/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 5/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 550/550 variables, and 619 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 341/341 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60164ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60165ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/215 places, 342/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60435 ms. Remains : 208/215 places, 342/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 213 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), true, (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 38 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-09 finished in 60670 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 6 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 195 edges and 215 vertex of which 4 / 215 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 83 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 83 transitions
Performed 83 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 83
Iterating post reduction 0 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 212 transition count 363
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 1 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 129 transition count 334
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 112 transition count 333
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 111 transition count 331
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 110 transition count 331
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 110 transition count 325
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 104 transition count 325
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 100 transition count 321
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 100 transition count 321
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 100 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 339 place count 99 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 99 transition count 220
Performed 41 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 58 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 58 transition count 177
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 432 place count 49 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 7 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 441 place count 49 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 445 place count 49 transition count 123
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 447 place count 48 transition count 122
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 448 place count 48 transition count 122
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 46 transition count 120
Applied a total of 450 rules in 33 ms. Remains 46 /215 variables (removed 169) and now considering 120/449 (removed 329) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 46 cols
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned [45]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/215 places, 120/449 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 44 transition count 119
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 44 /45 variables (removed 1) and now considering 119/120 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 44 cols
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/215 places, 119/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 252 ms. Remains : 44/215 places, 119/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24 reset in 95 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 49 reset in 74 ms.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 118 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 101 steps (5 resets) in 5 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 157 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 6 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 119/119 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 119/119 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:11:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:11:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:11:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:11:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 00:11:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/162 variables, 44/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/163 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 163/163 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 4302 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 118/162 variables, 44/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 116/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 3/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/163 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/163 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 163/163 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 21802 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 26195ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26196ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26315 ms. Remains : 44/44 places, 119/119 transitions.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 124 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 192 steps (5 resets) in 6 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 169 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 39 reset in 51 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8 reset in 47 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin3585465604836485045
[2025-05-31 00:12:12] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 119 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:12:12] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:12:12] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 119 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:12:12] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:12:12] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 119 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:12:12] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-31 00:12:12] [INFO ] Built C files in 19ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin3585465604836485045
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3585465604836485045;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 295 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin3585465604836485045;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 38 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin3585465604836485045;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased6533299054077131855.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 161 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-10 finished in 28600 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((F(G(p0))||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 209 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 209 transition count 443
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 116 rules in 10 ms. Remains 207 /215 variables (removed 8) and now considering 341/449 (removed 108) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:12:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:12:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:12:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/548 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 35/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 14/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 7/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/620 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 621 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60174ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60175ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/215 places, 341/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60405 ms. Remains : 207/215 places, 341/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 175 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 11 reset in 89 ms.
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 980 steps with 10 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-11 finished in 60692 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(!(G(p0) U (p1 U p0)))&&X((X(p1)&&p2))))'
Support contains 7 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 209 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 209 transition count 443
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 208 transition count 342
Applied a total of 114 rules in 13 ms. Remains 208 /215 variables (removed 7) and now considering 342/449 (removed 107) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 342 rows 208 cols
[2025-05-31 00:13:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:13:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 341 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:13:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 19/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 13/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 4/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 550/550 variables, and 280 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 341/341 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 6/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 341/622 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 5/627 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 550/550 variables, and 628 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 341/341 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60171ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60172ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/215 places, 342/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60401 ms. Remains : 208/215 places, 342/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), true, p0, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-13 finished in 60606 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 215 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 215/215 places, 449/449 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 201 edges and 215 vertex of which 4 / 215 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 85 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 85 transitions
Performed 85 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 85
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 212 transition count 361
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 1 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 127 transition count 330
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 109 transition count 330
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 109 transition count 324
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 103 transition count 324
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 236 place count 99 transition count 320
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 99 transition count 320
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 99 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 341 place count 98 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 98 transition count 219
Performed 44 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 54 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 431 place count 54 transition count 173
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 440 place count 45 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 45 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 454 place count 45 transition count 119
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 44 transition count 118
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 42 transition count 116
Applied a total of 458 rules in 24 ms. Remains 42 /215 variables (removed 173) and now considering 116/449 (removed 333) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 42 cols
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned [38, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/215 places, 116/449 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 38 transition count 114
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 38 /40 variables (removed 2) and now considering 114/116 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 38 cols
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 38/215 places, 114/449 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 246 ms. Remains : 38/215 places, 114/449 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-15
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 77 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLFireability-15 finished in 296 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 743244 ms.

BK_STOP 1748650454684

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-05b, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800676"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-05b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;