Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729800675.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-05b, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800675
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748649657086

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 87 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Transformed 255 places.
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Transformed 490 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 255 places and 490 transitions and 2527 arcs in 176 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 11 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 33 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 490/490 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 224 transition count 459
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 224 transition count 459
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 220 transition count 455
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 220 transition count 455
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 219 transition count 454
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 219 transition count 454
Applied a total of 72 rules in 68 ms. Remains 219 /255 variables (removed 36) and now considering 454/490 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 454 rows 219 cols
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 282 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 261 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 576 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 453 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 147 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 19/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD413 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 454/673 variables, 219/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 673/673 variables, and 289 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 453/453 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/219 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 60/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 454/673 variables, 219/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 451/740 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 3/743 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 673/673 variables, and 743 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 451/453 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60795ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 451 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 60808ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 219/255 places, 452/490 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 452/452 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61487 ms. Remains : 219/255 places, 452/490 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 31 out of 218 places after structural reductions.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-31 00:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 65 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 452 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (80 resets) in 866 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 1/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (67 resets) in 211 ms. (188 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 452 rows 218 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:00] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 67/71 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 147/218 variables, 7/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 452/670 variables, 218/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/670 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 670/670 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 140 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/670 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 24 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/10 constraints, State Equation: 0/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 173ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 8 simplifications.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 41 stabilizing places and 41 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F((G((F(p1)||p0))||X(p2)))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 210 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 210 transition count 444
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 210 transition count 344
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 122 rules in 25 ms. Remains 207 /218 variables (removed 11) and now considering 341/452 (removed 111) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 15/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 12/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 4/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 49/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/606 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 2/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/609 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60207ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60217ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/218 places, 341/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60478 ms. Remains : 207/218 places, 341/452 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 362 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13 reset in 187 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 3743 steps with 41 reset with depth 246 and stack size 246 in 7 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 61097 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 452/452 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 199 edges and 218 vertex of which 4 / 218 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 79 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 79 transitions
Performed 79 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 79
Iterating post reduction 0 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 215 transition count 370
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 1 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 136 transition count 338
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 117 transition count 335
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 114 transition count 335
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 114 transition count 329
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 108 transition count 329
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 101 transition count 322
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 101 transition count 322
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 101 transition count 222
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 101 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 100 transition count 221
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 346 place count 98 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 98 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 98 transition count 213
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 97 transition count 213
Performed 39 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 429 place count 58 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 58 transition count 172
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 438 place count 50 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 8 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 446 place count 50 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 50 transition count 124
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 49 transition count 123
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 47 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 454 place count 46 transition count 121
Applied a total of 454 rules in 72 ms. Remains 46 /218 variables (removed 172) and now considering 121/452 (removed 331) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 46 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned [42, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/218 places, 121/452 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 119
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 42 /44 variables (removed 2) and now considering 119/121 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 42 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/218 places, 119/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 283 ms. Remains : 42/218 places, 119/452 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 457 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 452/452 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 205 edges and 218 vertex of which 4 / 218 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 86 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 86 transitions
Performed 86 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 86
Iterating post reduction 0 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 215 transition count 363
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 1 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 129 transition count 331
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 110 transition count 331
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 110 transition count 325
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 104 transition count 325
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 96 transition count 317
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 96 transition count 317
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 96 transition count 217
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 96 transition count 216
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 95 transition count 216
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 357 place count 92 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 92 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 92 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 90 transition count 201
Performed 38 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 1 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 442 place count 52 transition count 162
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 443 place count 52 transition count 161
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 451 place count 44 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 44 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 44 transition count 113
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 43 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 41 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 467 place count 40 transition count 110
Applied a total of 467 rules in 47 ms. Remains 40 /218 variables (removed 178) and now considering 110/452 (removed 342) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 40 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned [36, 39]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/218 places, 110/452 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 36 transition count 108
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 36 /38 variables (removed 2) and now considering 108/110 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 36 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/218 places, 108/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 251 ms. Remains : 36/218 places, 108/452 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-06
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 303 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 452/452 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 201 edges and 218 vertex of which 4 / 218 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 83 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 83 transitions
Performed 83 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 83
Iterating post reduction 0 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 215 transition count 366
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 1 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 132 transition count 337
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 115 transition count 336
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 114 transition count 336
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 114 transition count 329
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 107 transition count 329
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 236 place count 100 transition count 322
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 100 transition count 322
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 97 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 97 transition count 301
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 97 transition count 299
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 96 transition count 299
Performed 39 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 57 transition count 260
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 57 transition count 259
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 339 place count 49 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 49 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 49 transition count 171
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 48 transition count 170
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 48 transition count 169
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 355 place count 48 transition count 169
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 357 place count 46 transition count 167
Applied a total of 357 rules in 51 ms. Remains 46 /218 variables (removed 172) and now considering 167/452 (removed 285) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 167 rows 46 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned [40, 45]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/218 places, 167/452 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 165
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 42 /44 variables (removed 2) and now considering 165/167 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 42 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/218 places, 165/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 281 ms. Remains : 42/218 places, 165/452 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 16 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 377 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 209 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 209 transition count 443
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 124 rules in 13 ms. Remains 206 /218 variables (removed 12) and now considering 340/452 (removed 112) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 162 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60190ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60191ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/218 places, 340/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60437 ms. Remains : 206/218 places, 340/452 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3175 reset in 88 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3188 reset in 106 ms.
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Detected a total of 35/206 stabilizing places and 35/340 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 70 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 103 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 86 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 161 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 98 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 111 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 182/309/182 causal constraints (skipped 157 transitions) in 26 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Added : 80 causal constraints over 16 iterations in 342 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 1 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 340/340 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 340/340 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 235 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60202ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60206ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60452 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 340/340 transitions.
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Detected a total of 35/206 stabilizing places and 35/340 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 99 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 119 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 91 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 110 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 170 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 00:05:06] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 95 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 105 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 182/309/182 causal constraints (skipped 157 transitions) in 39 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:05:07] [INFO ] Added : 80 causal constraints over 16 iterations in 378 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 126 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3171 reset in 86 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3180 reset in 96 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 1 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 340/340 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 194 edges and 206 vertex of which 4 / 206 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 204 transition count 338
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 204 transition count 325
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 204 transition count 325
Deduced a syphon composed of 93 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 204 transition count 325
Discarding 66 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 66 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 138 transition count 259
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 138 transition count 259
Performed 53 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -6
Deduced a syphon composed of 81 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 138 transition count 265
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 138 transition count 263
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 342 place count 90 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 90 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 90 transition count 160
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 405 place count 85 transition count 155
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 85 transition count 155
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 85 transition count 155
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 413 place count 83 transition count 153
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 83 transition count 153
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -6
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 83 transition count 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 417 rules in 31 ms. Remains 83 /206 variables (removed 123) and now considering 159/340 (removed 181) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 83 cols
[2025-05-31 00:05:08] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 17/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 35 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 35 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 35 solved, 123 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 158/241 variables, 83/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 56/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved in 5443 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 41/83 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 18/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 158/241 variables, 83/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 56/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 111/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 3/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 1/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 1/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 282 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved in 24049 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/158 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 29572ms problems are : Problem set: 47 solved, 111 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 47 dead transitions in 29573ms
Found 47 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 47 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 47 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/206 places, 112/340 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 348 edges and 83 vertex of which 43 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 40 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 40 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 43 /83 variables (removed 40) and now considering 112/112 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 43/206 places, 112/340 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 29625 ms. Remains : 43/206 places, 112/340 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin14513038740820627232
[2025-05-31 00:05:37] [INFO ] Built C files in 17ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin14513038740820627232
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14513038740820627232;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 668 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14513038740820627232;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 45 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin14513038740820627232;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15920373004067436900.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 840 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-09 finished in 155990 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F((X(p0) U p0))&&((G(p0)||!p1) U X(p2))))'
Support contains 6 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 211 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 211 transition count 445
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 211 transition count 345
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 209 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 209 transition count 343
Applied a total of 118 rules in 14 ms. Remains 209 /218 variables (removed 9) and now considering 343/452 (removed 109) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 343 rows 209 cols
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 250 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 342 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 343/552 variables, 209/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 5/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 552/552 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 342/342 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 61/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 343/552 variables, 209/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 342/622 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 1/623 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60173ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60175ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 209/218 places, 343/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60440 ms. Remains : 209/218 places, 343/452 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 245 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 128 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 129 ms.
Computed a total of 37 stabilizing places and 37 stable transitions
Computed a total of 37 stabilizing places and 37 stable transitions
Detected a total of 37/209 stabilizing places and 37/343 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0 p2), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p2))))), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p2)))))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 18 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 60985 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||(X(p1)&&G(p2))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 210 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 210 transition count 444
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 210 transition count 344
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 122 rules in 6 ms. Remains 207 /218 variables (removed 11) and now considering 341/452 (removed 111) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:06:40] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:06:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:06:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 3/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 269 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 47/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 4/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/617 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 617 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60202ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60204ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/218 places, 341/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60452 ms. Remains : 207/218 places, 341/452 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 226 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2059 steps with 21 reset in 8 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutonomousCar-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-13 finished in 60700 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 402890 ms.

BK_STOP 1748650061198

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-05b, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800675"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-05b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;