Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729800674.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-05b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800674
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748649572966

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 87 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Transformed 255 places.
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Transformed 490 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 255 places and 490 transitions and 2527 arcs in 173 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 72 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 490/490 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 225 transition count 460
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 225 transition count 460
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 225 transition count 360
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 220 transition count 355
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 220 transition count 355
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 219 transition count 354
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 219 transition count 354
Applied a total of 172 rules in 79 ms. Remains 219 /255 variables (removed 36) and now considering 354/490 (removed 136) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 354 rows 219 cols
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 162 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 414 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 353 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 353 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 353 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 353 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 12/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 353 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 19/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 353 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 353 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 353 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 353 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 353 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD312 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 354/573 variables, 219/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 573/573 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 353/353 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/219 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 56/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 354/573 variables, 219/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 351/637 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 1/638 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 34 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 573/573 variables, and 641 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 351/353 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60361ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 351 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 60375ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 219/255 places, 352/490 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 352/352 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60891 ms. Remains : 219/255 places, 352/490 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 70 out of 218 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 352 transitions.
Support contains 69 out of 218 places (down from 70) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (112 resets) in 1383 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 20/58 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 43 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 352 rows 218 cols
[2025-05-31 00:00:36] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp49 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 193/218 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 352/570 variables, 218/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/570 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/570 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 570/570 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 18 unsolved in 512 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 196/218 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 17 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 352/570 variables, 218/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/570 variables, 16/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/570 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/570 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/570 variables, 2/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/570 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/570 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 570/570 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 16 unsolved in 4329 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/20 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 4890ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 16 unsolved
Fused 16 Parikh solutions to 14 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 860 ms.
Support contains 17 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 190 edges and 218 vertex of which 2 / 218 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 5 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 692 edges and 217 vertex of which 216 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 82 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 82 transitions
Performed 82 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 82
Iterating post reduction 0 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 216 transition count 267
Reduce places removed 82 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 1 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 134 transition count 238
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 118 transition count 238
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 118 transition count 232
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 112 transition count 232
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 108 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 108 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 107 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 107 transition count 227
Performed 42 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 42
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 65 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 65 transition count 184
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 321 place count 63 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 63 transition count 172
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 62 transition count 171
Free-agglomeration rule applied 13 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 62 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 49 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 48 transition count 157
Applied a total of 352 rules in 77 ms. Remains 48 /218 variables (removed 170) and now considering 157/352 (removed 195) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 77 ms. Remains : 48/218 places, 157/352 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (167 resets) in 343 ms. (116 steps per ms) remains 11/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (152 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 8/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (193 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 6/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (123 resets) in 112 ms. (353 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (308 resets) in 59 ms. (666 steps per ms) remains 3/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (285 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (148 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 48 cols
[2025-05-31 00:00:42] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 16/22 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/159 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 46/205 variables, 26/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 6/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/205 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 205/205 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 169 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 16/22 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/159 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 46/205 variables, 26/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 6/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 3/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/205 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 205/205 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 302 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 480ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 102 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 48 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 48/48 places, 157/157 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 48 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 47 transition count 156
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 45 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 45 transition count 144
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 44 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 44 transition count 142
Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 44 transition count 137
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 25 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 39 transition count 112
Applied a total of 44 rules in 17 ms. Remains 39 /48 variables (removed 9) and now considering 112/157 (removed 45) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 39/48 places, 112/157 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (13 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (457 resets) in 31 ms. (1250 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (20 resets) in 61 ms. (645 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 186063 steps, run visited all 2 properties in 347 ms. (steps per millisecond=536 )
Probabilistic random walk after 186063 steps, saw 32014 distinct states, run finished after 351 ms. (steps per millisecond=530 ) properties seen :2
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-31 00:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 352 transitions.
Support contains 61 out of 218 places (down from 62) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 38 stabilizing places and 38 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 24 rules in 6 ms. Remains 206 /218 variables (removed 12) and now considering 340/352 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:00:43] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:00:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60184ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60189ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60420 ms. Remains : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 340 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3564983644096731231.gal : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15724895703294947425.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3564983644096731231.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15724895703294947425.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5460876351504752978.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5460876351504752978.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5460876351504752978.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5460876351504752978.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5460876351504752978.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 451 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4880146265110193528.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13768915566335975666.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4880146265110193528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13768915566335975666.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.84316e+10,0.056184,5872,468,102,2908,642,488,4222,83,2002,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EG((((i12.u1.p6==0)||(i12.u1.p14==0))||((i1.i1.u15.p48==0)||(i12.u1.p212==0)))) + EG((((i12.u1.p6==0)||(i12.u1.p15==0))||((i4.u25.p8...260
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(EY(Init),(((i12.u1.p6==0)||(i12.u1.p14==0))||((i1.i1.u15.p48==0)||(i12.u1.p212==0))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(...349
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,1,1.46056,64752,1,0,156826,1845,2194,145829,375,16841,189060
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 206 edges and 218 vertex of which 4 / 218 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 87 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 87 transitions
Performed 87 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 87
Iterating post reduction 0 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 215 transition count 262
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 1 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 128 transition count 231
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 110 transition count 230
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 109 transition count 230
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 109 transition count 223
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 102 transition count 223
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 97 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 97 transition count 218
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 95 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 95 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 95 transition count 210
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 94 transition count 210
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 60 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 60 transition count 175
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 335 place count 51 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 7 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 51 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 51 transition count 117
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 47 transition count 117
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 46 transition count 116
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 46 transition count 115
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 44 transition count 113
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 43 transition count 113
Applied a total of 362 rules in 39 ms. Remains 43 /218 variables (removed 175) and now considering 113/352 (removed 239) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 43 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:15] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:02:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned [37, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/218 places, 113/352 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 41 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 112
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 39 transition count 111
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 39 /41 variables (removed 2) and now considering 111/113 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 39 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 39/218 places, 111/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 276 ms. Remains : 39/218 places, 111/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13087445715161883346.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9779893575461085067.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13087445715161883346.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9779893575461085067.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,225175,0.168661,10076,2,566,5,17613,6,0,266,23349,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((p12==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((p12==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t109, Intersection with reachable...226
(forward)formula 0,0,1.36479,48980,1,0,584,218994,248,260,3747,258926,630
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 210 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 210 transition count 344
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 208 transition count 342
Applied a total of 20 rules in 19 ms. Remains 208 /218 variables (removed 10) and now considering 342/352 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 342 rows 208 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 216 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 341 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 12/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 7/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 4/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 5/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 550/550 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 341/341 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 43/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 341/603 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 1/604 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 5/609 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 550/550 variables, and 609 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 341/341 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60171ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60173ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/218 places, 342/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60410 ms. Remains : 208/218 places, 342/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 342 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2392143294164193664.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1010892165953150915.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2392143294164193664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1010892165953150915.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11456743448046171308.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11456743448046171308.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11456743448046171308.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11456743448046171308.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11456743448046171308.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 450 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 28 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10256981125727038584.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13541641420815124684.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10256981125727038584.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13541641420815124684.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.09953e+10,0.052358,6032,484,102,3240,618,469,4586,86,1968,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((EG(((!(AX((i7.u44.p144==1))) + ((((i1.i1.u18.p59==1)&&(i4.u25.p84==1))&&((i6.i1.u37.p121==1)&&(i7.u44.p146==1)))&&((i10.u56.p183==1)...322
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((i14.u67.p227==1))))) * !(E(!((i14.u67.p227==1)) U (!(!((EG(((!(!(EX(!((i7.u44.p144==1))))) + (...439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t196, t203, t218, t253, t273, t339, i1.i1.t187, i1.i1.u9.t167, i1.i1.u18.t168, i2.u15.t171, i...716
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,7.12195,255504,1,0,539806,4224,3282,693479,478,28696,547345
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 200 edges and 218 vertex of which 4 / 218 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 83 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 83 transitions
Performed 83 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 83
Iterating post reduction 0 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 215 transition count 266
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 1 with 113 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 132 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 115 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 114 transition count 235
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 114 transition count 229
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 108 transition count 229
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 233 place count 103 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 103 transition count 224
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 101 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 101 transition count 218
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 101 transition count 216
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 100 transition count 216
Performed 35 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 65 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 65 transition count 180
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 323 place count 58 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 7 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 58 transition count 140
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 58 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 56 transition count 136
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 55 transition count 135
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 55 transition count 134
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 55 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 53 transition count 132
Applied a total of 342 rules in 52 ms. Remains 53 /218 variables (removed 165) and now considering 132/352 (removed 220) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 53 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/218 places, 132/352 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 51 transition count 131
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 51 /52 variables (removed 1) and now considering 131/132 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 51 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/218 places, 131/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 275 ms. Remains : 51/218 places, 131/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 131 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18271288422808580436.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17067454634152893113.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18271288422808580436.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17067454634152893113.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.9828e+06,1.38291,48340,2,2900,5,155033,6,0,334,141784,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((E(!(((((p6==1)&&(p17==1))&&((p98==1)&&(p212==1)))||((p189==1)&&(p228==1)))) U (((p6==1)&&(p15==1))&&((p129==1)&&(p212==1)))) * (p198=...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p198==0)),!(((((p6==1)&&(p17==1))&&((p98==1)&&(p212==1)))||((p189==1)&&(p228==1))))) ...213
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 32/97/99
(forward)formula 0,1,1.4799,48340,1,0,9,155033,17,2,966,141784,5
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 209 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 22 rules in 19 ms. Remains 207 /218 variables (removed 11) and now considering 341/352 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:57] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 216 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 5/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 46/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 8/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/617 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 617 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60178ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60179ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60416 ms. Remains : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9671310119324138943.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4963859635077549941.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9671310119324138943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4963859635077549941.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13060042613056163028.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13060042613056163028.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13060042613056163028.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13060042613056163028.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13060042613056163028.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 445 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 34 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10453294953638520439.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5744076494520392384.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10453294953638520439.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5744076494520392384.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.88564e+10,0.07402,7268,482,102,5368,1397,444,9131,84,7016,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(EX(TRUE)) + (i12.i0.u53.p187==1)) + (((i13.u60.p6==1)&&(i13.u60.p15==1))&&((i4.i0.u17.p67==1)&&(i13.u60.p212==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE)))) + (i12.i0.u53.p187==1)) + (((i13.u60.p6==1)&&(i13.u60.p15==1))&&((i4.i0....199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t195, t205, t220, t250, t270, t295, t338, i0.u52.t32, i0.u52.t35, i0.u52.t36, i0.u52.t37, i2....691
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,0,7.16051,274276,1,0,692676,3976,3030,528226,456,52039,730680
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 210 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 210 transition count 344
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 208 transition count 342
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 208 /218 variables (removed 10) and now considering 342/352 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 342 rows 208 cols
[2025-05-31 00:05:35] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:05:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 341 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 2/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 5/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 550/550 variables, and 251 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 341/341 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 28/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 15/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 6/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 3/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 341/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 5/617 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60189ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60191ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/218 places, 342/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60427 ms. Remains : 208/218 places, 342/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:06:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 342 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:06:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14777652733203161454.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2493249004337522451.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14777652733203161454.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2493249004337522451.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2057277844953689776.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2057277844953689776.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2057277844953689776.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2057277844953689776.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2057277844953689776.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 551 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7539799678983311336.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3796523634764849017.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7539799678983311336.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3796523634764849017.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.36996e+10,0.075445,7072,556,79,5753,453,515,7133,67,1248,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX((i16.i1.u71.p232==0)) * ((!(E((((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u1.p16==1))&&((i8.u45.p145==1)&&(i0.u1.p212==1))) U (i1.u6.p24==1))) + (i13.u65...291
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!((i16.i1.u71.p232==0)))) * ((!(E((((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u1.p16==1))&&((i8.u45.p145==1)&&(i0.u1.p...340
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t196, t199, t200, t202, t219, t220, t222, t254, t255, t257, t274, t275, t277, t294, t295, t29...770
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,1.51205,74016,1,0,188348,702,3522,158836,358,2201,263500
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 24 rules in 6 ms. Remains 206 /218 variables (removed 12) and now considering 340/352 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:07:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:07:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 135 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:07:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60181ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60182ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60396 ms. Remains : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 340 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4674375778431033854.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6574379598183072941.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4674375778431033854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6574379598183072941.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph529150982131639916.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph529150982131639916.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph529150982131639916.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph529150982131639916.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph529150982131639916.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 451 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8186701590461991835.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3758176323704246465.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8186701590461991835.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3758176323704246465.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.84316e+10,0.085029,7680,717,100,6116,1143,474,11075,83,6038,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((!(A(!((((i15.u1.p6==1)&&(i15.u1.p15==1))&&((i5.i1.u29.p110==1)&&(i15.u1.p212==1)))) U E((((i15.u1.p6==1)&&(i15.u1.p16==1))&&((i7.i...352
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((!(!((E(!(E((((i15.u1.p6==1)&&(i15.u1.p16==1))&&((i7.i0.u40.p129==1)&&(i15.u1.p212==1))) U (((i1...742
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t194, t201, t216, t251, t271, t291, t337, i1.i1.t185, i1.i1.u10.t165, i1.i1.u19.t166, i2.u16....714
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,17.0773,579968,1,0,1.18627e+06,5635,3514,1.62758e+06,482,56687,1382588
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 209 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 22 rules in 6 ms. Remains 207 /218 variables (removed 11) and now considering 341/352 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:08:54] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:08:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:08:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 5/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 3/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 52/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/609 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 616 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60185ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60187ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60405 ms. Remains : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:09:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:09:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3299023100954098953.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2062685752757070194.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3299023100954098953.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2062685752757070194.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2197569292013944127.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2197569292013944127.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2197569292013944127.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2197569292013944127.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2197569292013944127.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 453 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4482230528121390696.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11884157253799325802.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4482230528121390696.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11884157253799325802.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.93301e+10,0.125244,9740,1073,105,12620,961,475,13312,86,3019,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(((((EX((i1.i1.u5.p20==1)) * E((i7.u38.p120==1) U (i0.u2.p211==1))) * ((i9.u44.p147==0)&&(i3.u17.p53==1))) * (((i5.u27.p84==1)&&(i7....238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((((EX((i1.i1.u5.p20==1)) * E((i7.u38.p120==1) U (i0.u2.p211==1))) * ((i9.u44.p147==0)&&(i3....289
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t195, t199, t219, t254, t274, t338, i0.t193, i2.i1.t186, i2.i1.u10.t166, i2.i1.u19.t167, i3.u...719
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 209 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 22 rules in 5 ms. Remains 207 /218 variables (removed 11) and now considering 341/352 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:10:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:10:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 216 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:10:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 5/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
(t64 0.0timeout
^^^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0.0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 1.0)
(t1 1.0)
(t2 1.0)
(t3 1.0)
(t4 1.0)
(t5 1.0)
(t6 1.0)
(t7 1.0)
(t8 1.0)
(t9 1.0)
(t10 0.0)
(t11 0.0)
(t12 0.0)
(t13 0.0)
(t14 0.0)
(t15 0.0)
(t16 0.0)
(t17 0.0)
(t18 0.0)
(t19 0.0)
(t20 0.0)
(t21 0.0)
(t22 1.0)
(t23 1.0)
(t24 1.0)
(t25 0.0)
(t26 0.0)
(t27 0.0)
(t28 0.0)
(t29 0.0)
(t30 0.0)
(t31 1.0)
(t32 1.0)
(t33 0.0)
(t34 0.0)
(t35 0.0)
(t36 1.0)
(t37 0.0)
(t38 0.0)
(t39 0.0)
(t40 0.0)
(t41 0.0)
(t42 0.0)
(t43 0.0)
(t44 0.0)
(t45 0.0)
(t46 0.0)
(t47 0.0)
(t48 0.0)
(t49 0.0)
(t50 0.0)
(t51 0.0)
(t52 1.0)
(t53 0.0)
(t54 0.0)
(t55 1.0)
(t56 1.0)
(t57 1.0)
(t58 1.0)
(t59 1.0)
(t60 1.0)
(t61 1.0)
(t62 1.0)
(t63 1.0)
(t64 0.0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 46/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 8/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/617 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 617 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60175ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60176ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60399 ms. Remains : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9796875012162282589.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8014262329635497295.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9796875012162282589.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8014262329635497295.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8853201406212042378.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8853201406212042378.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8853201406212042378.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8853201406212042378.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8853201406212042378.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 452 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13676031854600882231.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3426468888073615333.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13676031854600882231.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3426468888073615333.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.88564e+10,0.073039,7032,556,103,5822,636,463,7458,81,2237,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((!(A(AG((i12.i0.u59.p193!=1)) U EF((((i0.u1.p6==1)&&(i0.u1.p9==1))&&((i4.u24.p79==1)&&(i0.u1.p212==1)))))) * EG(AX((((i0.u1.p6==0)||(i...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (((i0.u1.p6==1)&&(i0.u1.p9==1))&&((i4.u24.p79==1)&&(i0.u1.p212==1)))))))) * !(E(!...488
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t195, t201, t226, t256, t271, t296, t338, i0.t193, i2.i1.t186, i2.i1.u9.t166, i2.i1.u18.t167,...712
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 209 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 22 rules in 6 ms. Remains 207 /218 variables (removed 11) and now considering 341/352 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:12:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:12:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 220 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:12:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 14/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 8/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 3/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 284 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 62/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/621 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/622 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/623 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60186ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60187ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60414 ms. Remains : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5430311544011599868.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6039556597548616567.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5430311544011599868.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6039556597548616567.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10197538640611605236.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10197538640611605236.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10197538640611605236.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10197538640611605236.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10197538640611605236.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 460 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2718332951803208759.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11225917752441914941.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2718332951803208759.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11225917752441914941.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.0054e+10,0.092885,7776,637,100,6212,1117,498,11615,81,6146,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(((((E((((i13.u1.p6==1)&&(i13.u1.p9==1))&&((i3.i1.u9.p48==1)&&(i13.u1.p212==1))) U (((i13.u1.p6==1)&&(i13.u1.p9==1))&&((i9.u47.p148...448
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((((E((((i13.u1.p6==1)&&(i13.u1.p9==1))&&((i3.i1.u9.p48==1)&&(i13.u1.p212==1))) U...1595
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t195, t197, t217, t252, t272, t292, t338, i0.u65.t32, i0.u65.t35, i0.u65.t36, i0.u65.t37, i2....719
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,3.25238,137312,1,0,318717,2833,3779,336160,454,19589,424788
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 24 rules in 15 ms. Remains 206 /218 variables (removed 12) and now considering 340/352 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:14:30] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:14:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:14:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60184ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60187ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60411 ms. Remains : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 340 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7625631925568907068.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:15:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15958260530633789542.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7625631925568907068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15958260530633789542.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph308660700571464876.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph308660700571464876.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph308660700571464876.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph308660700571464876.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph308660700571464876.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 452 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15957556843726432347.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6493366311572060566.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15957556843726432347.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6493366311572060566.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.84316e+10,0.074218,6892,569,103,5474,617,454,7498,83,2251,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((!(A((((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p16==1))&&((i9.u45.p148==1)&&(i0.u2.p212==1))) U (((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p14==1))&&((i11.u55.p176==1)...288
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * (!(!((E(!((((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p14==1))&&((i11.u55.p176==1)&&(i0.u2.p212==1)))) U (!...535
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t194, t199, t219, t254, t269, t294, t337, i0.t192, i2.i1.t185, i2.i1.u10.t165, i2.i1.u19.t166...701
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,1,13.4842,490348,1,0,1.05546e+06,4637,3343,1.19595e+06,485,30229,1307561
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 24 rules in 6 ms. Remains 206 /218 variables (removed 12) and now considering 340/352 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:16:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:16:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:16:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60184ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60185ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60416 ms. Remains : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 340 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5244159899210350453.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14411394267217909358.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5244159899210350453.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14411394267217909358.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9537435219993871768.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9537435219993871768.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9537435219993871768.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9537435219993871768.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9537435219993871768.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 449 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 28 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2505391088745261718.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10901110283616491776.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2505391088745261718.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10901110283616491776.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.84316e+10,0.056443,6144,501,100,3533,849,468,4352,81,2443,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((EG((i11.i0.u57.p192==0)) * AF((((i12.u64.p6==1)&&(i12.u64.p15==1))&&((i6.u35.p117==1)&&(i12.u64.p212==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(EG((i11.i0.u57.p192==0)) * !(EG(!((((i12.u64.p6==1)&&(i12.u64.p15==1))&&((i6.u35.p117==1)&&(i12....184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t194, t197, t217, t252, t272, t287, t337, i1.i1.t185, i1.i1.u9.t165, i1.i1.u18.t166, i2.u15.t...719
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,8.12895,290560,1,0,598282,5022,3266,764908,449,39594,603243
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 209 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 22 rules in 7 ms. Remains 207 /218 variables (removed 11) and now considering 341/352 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:17:53] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:17:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:17:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 2/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 4/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 53/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 8/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 6/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/624 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 4/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 628 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 60174ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60175ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60401 ms. Remains : 207/218 places, 341/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6095023228092214840.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:18:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability252815976169806004.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6095023228092214840.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability252815976169806004.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5916757887321749403.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5916757887321749403.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5916757887321749403.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5916757887321749403.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5916757887321749403.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 446 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 34 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6122545451235132443.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3186511094846375241.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6122545451235132443.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3186511094846375241.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.84316e+10,0.062959,6544,504,102,4444,671,455,7196,83,3148,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((i4.i1.u19.p66==1) U A((((i13.u1.p6==1)&&(i13.u1.p16==1))&&((i5.u24.p86==1)&&(i13.u1.p212==1))) U ((EF((((i13.u1.p6==1)&&(i13.u1.p17==1...355
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(i4.i1.u19.p66==1)) * !(EG(!(((E(TRUE U (((i13.u1.p6==1)&&(i13.u1.p17==1))&&((i7.u35.p117==1)&&(i13...921
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t195, t202, t222, t252, t272, t292, t338, i0.u62.t32, i0.u62.t35, i0.u62.t36, i0.u62.t37, i3....700
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,1,22.0581,728192,1,0,1.45509e+06,4074,3269,1.96243e+06,479,31213,1286617
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 209 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 209 transition count 343
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 208 transition count 342
Applied a total of 20 rules in 15 ms. Remains 208 /218 variables (removed 10) and now considering 342/352 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 342 rows 208 cols
[2025-05-31 00:19:45] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:19:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 341 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:19:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 17/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 8/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 3/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 550/550 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 341/341 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 52/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 4/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 342/550 variables, 208/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 341/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 1/616 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 5/621 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 550/550 variables, and 622 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 208/208 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 341/341 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60192ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 341 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60193ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/218 places, 342/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60430 ms. Remains : 208/218 places, 342/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 342 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14737212338767749290.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:20:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7944033147661144611.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14737212338767749290.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7944033147661144611.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18416757421927110488.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18416757421927110488.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18416757421927110488.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18416757421927110488.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18416757421927110488.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 457 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7436061044686024556.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16723849895271263076.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7436061044686024556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16723849895271263076.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.92811e+10,0.077726,6792,555,103,5499,564,442,6518,83,1715,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(E((i4.u3.p12!=1) U E(((i12.i1.u64.p199==1)&&(i7.u37.p118==1)) U ((((i2.u17.p53==1)&&(i5.u27.p84==1))&&((i7.u36.p115==1)&&(i9.u46.p14...230
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG((i6.u31.p111==1)))))) * !(E(!(EG((i6.u31.p111==1))) U (!(EX(E((i4.u3.p12!=1) U E(((i12.i1.u6...347
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t195, t197, t217, t252, t272, t292, t339, i1.i1.t186, i1.i1.u10.t166, i1.i1.u19.t167, i2.u16....701
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,18.1703,630976,1,0,1.28079e+06,4660,3214,1.71023e+06,460,33663,1344099
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 199 edges and 218 vertex of which 4 / 218 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 84 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 84 transitions
Performed 84 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 84
Iterating post reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 215 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 84 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 1 with 113 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 131 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 114 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 113 transition count 235
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 113 transition count 228
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 106 transition count 228
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 236 place count 101 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 101 transition count 223
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 99 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 99 transition count 217
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 99 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 98 transition count 215
Performed 35 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 63 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 63 transition count 179
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 327 place count 55 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 55 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 55 transition count 129
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 53 transition count 128
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 52 transition count 128
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 51 transition count 127
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 51 transition count 126
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 49 transition count 124
Applied a total of 350 rules in 35 ms. Remains 49 /218 variables (removed 169) and now considering 124/352 (removed 228) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 49 cols
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned [43, 48]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/218 places, 124/352 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 47 transition count 123
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 46 transition count 123
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 46 transition count 122
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 45 transition count 122
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 45 /47 variables (removed 2) and now considering 122/124 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/218 places, 122/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 221 ms. Remains : 45/218 places, 122/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10606549124382053917.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8873092369777667349.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10606549124382053917.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8873092369777667349.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,742600,1.3887,51704,2,2776,5,148671,6,0,301,137852,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p151==0) + (((EF(EG((p76==1))) * (p6==1)) * ((p14==1)&&(p86==1))) * (p212==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p151==0))) * !(E(TRUE U EG((p76==1)))))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p151==0)))...316
(forward)formula 0,0,1.39234,51704,1,0,11,148671,11,4,309,137852,2
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 352/352 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 24 rules in 13 ms. Remains 206 /218 variables (removed 12) and now considering 340/352 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:21:36] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:21:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 213 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:21:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60187ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60188ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60416 ms. Remains : 206/218 places, 340/352 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 340 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6439756851854555046.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:22:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7712296964413880494.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6439756851854555046.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7712296964413880494.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:23:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:23:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4747978254875711801.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4747978254875711801.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4747978254875711801.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4747978254875711801.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4747978254875711801.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 440 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17565396608620810577.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11093131926421499549.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17565396608620810577.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11093131926421499549.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.84316e+10,0.061739,5864,423,105,3289,761,434,3924,82,1798,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((((i2.u14.p53==1)&&(i5.u23.p84==1))&&((i7.u32.p115==1)&&(i9.u43.p152==1)))&&((i11.u50.p177==1)&&(i0.u60.p213==1)))) * AX((i6.u28.p10...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(((((i2.u14.p53==1)&&(i5.u23.p84==1))&&((i7.u32.p115==1)&&(i9.u43.p152==1)))&&((i11.u50.p177==1)&&(...229
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,0,2.6157,122216,1,0,310688,2043,1759,222611,372,11977,388835
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3104591168161004740.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3104591168161004740.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3104591168161004740.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3104591168161004740.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3104591168161004740.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 443 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13055194789705024165.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:23:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8622135013563912369.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13055194789705024165.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8622135013563912369.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.55141e+10,0.093784,7576,686,114,6450,684,512,9855,86,2323,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(((((EX((i1.u5.p20==1)) * E((i7.u38.p120==1) U (i0.u2.p211==1))) * ((i8.u45.p147==0)&&(i3.u15.p53==1))) * (((i5.u26.p84==1)&&(i7.u38...232
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((((EX((i1.u5.p20==1)) * E((i7.u38.p120==1) U (i0.u2.p211==1))) * ((i8.u45.p147==0)&&(i3.u15...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t205, t214, t229, t264, t279, t349, i0.t203, i3.t196, i3.t185, i3.u15.t179, i3.u15.t180, i3.u...731
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,11.1487,395160,1,0,858631,3761,3568,1.05534e+06,472,20817,1047152
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AX((!(A(AG((i12.i0.u60.p193!=1)) U EF((((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p9==1))&&((i4.i1.u25.p79==1)&&(i0.u2.p212==1)))))) * EG(AX((((i0.u2.p6==0)|...212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p9==1))&&((i4.i1.u25.p79==1)&&(i0.u2.p212==1)))))))) * !(...497
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 1,0,48.7535,1557844,1,0,3.05286e+06,6585,3829,4.42704e+06,507,54841,3087320
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1464688 ms.

BK_STOP 1748651038816

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-05b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800674"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-05b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;