Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729800673.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-05b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800673
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748649375720

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 23:56:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 23:56:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 94 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Transformed 255 places.
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Transformed 490 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 255 places and 490 transitions and 2527 arcs in 191 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 103 out of 255 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 255/255 places, 490/490 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 239 transition count 474
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 239 transition count 474
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 238 transition count 473
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 238 transition count 473
Applied a total of 34 rules in 53 ms. Remains 238 /255 variables (removed 17) and now considering 473/490 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 473 rows 238 cols
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 290 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 270 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 589 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 472 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:56:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 195 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 205 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 228 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 154 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/711 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 0/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 472/472 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 65/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD430 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 473/711 variables, 238/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 470 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 470/783 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 470 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/711 variables, 1/784 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 470 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 711/711 variables, and 784 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 470 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 470/472 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60849ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 470 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 60868ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/255 places, 471/490 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 237 transition count 471
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 237 /238 variables (removed 1) and now considering 471/471 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 471 rows 237 cols
[2025-05-30 23:57:18] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:57:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 237/255 places, 471/490 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61783 ms. Remains : 237/255 places, 471/490 transitions.
Support contains 103 out of 237 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 23:57:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 471 transitions.
Support contains 99 out of 237 places (down from 103) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (119 resets) in 1082 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 5/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (50 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (65 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (39 resets) in 175 ms. (227 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (41 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (70 resets) in 112 ms. (353 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-05-30 23:57:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 191/211 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 26/237 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 471/708 variables, 237/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/708 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/708 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 708/708 variables, and 247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 463 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 191/211 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 257 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 26/237 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 471/708 variables, 237/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/708 variables, 5/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/708 variables, 4/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/708 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/708 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 708/708 variables, and 264 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 2378 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2856ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1138 ms.
Support contains 20 out of 237 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 186 edges and 237 vertex of which 4 / 237 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 738 edges and 235 vertex of which 231 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 73 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 73 transitions
Performed 73 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 73
Iterating post reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 231 transition count 392
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 158 transition count 374
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 149 transition count 368
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 143 transition count 368
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 143 transition count 362
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 137 transition count 362
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 120 transition count 345
Iterating global reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 120 transition count 345
Ensure Unique test removed 103 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 103 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 120 transition count 241
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 119 transition count 240
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 118 transition count 240
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 118 transition count 238
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 116 transition count 238
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 348 place count 112 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 112 transition count 222
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 80 transition count 190
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 422 place count 74 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 74 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 429 place count 74 transition count 155
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 74 transition count 154
Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 74 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 446 place count 66 transition count 146
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 448 place count 66 transition count 144
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 66 transition count 144
Applied a total of 449 rules in 88 ms. Remains 66 /237 variables (removed 171) and now considering 144/471 (removed 327) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 88 ms. Remains : 66/237 places, 144/471 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2016 resets) in 338 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (343 resets) in 73 ms. (540 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (347 resets) in 58 ms. (678 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (354 resets) in 49 ms. (800 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (402 resets) in 50 ms. (784 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (278 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1665499 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=554 ) properties seen :2 out of 5
Probabilistic random walk after 1665499 steps, saw 261171 distinct states, run finished after 3004 ms. (steps per millisecond=554 ) properties seen :2
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 66 cols
[2025-05-30 23:57:27] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 29/40 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/57 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 140/197 variables, 57/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 57/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 10/207 variables, 7/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/210 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 210/210 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 29/40 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/57 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 140/197 variables, 57/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 57/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 10/207 variables, 7/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 3/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 3/210 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 210/210 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 751 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 886ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 93 ms.
Support contains 11 out of 66 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 66/66 places, 144/144 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 362 edges and 66 vertex of which 64 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 64 transition count 134
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 56 transition count 133
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 56 transition count 132
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 55 transition count 132
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 55 transition count 131
Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 55 transition count 128
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 52 transition count 128
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 52 transition count 126
Applied a total of 29 rules in 20 ms. Remains 52 /66 variables (removed 14) and now considering 126/144 (removed 18) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 20 ms. Remains : 52/66 places, 126/144 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1587 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (293 resets) in 38 ms. (1025 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (493 resets) in 35 ms. (1111 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (151 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 383110 states, properties seen :2
Probabilistic random walk after 2554575 steps, saw 383110 distinct states, run finished after 2791 ms. (steps per millisecond=915 ) properties seen :2
Explored full state space saw : 383110 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 2554575 steps, saw 383110 distinct states, run finished after 1911 ms. (steps per millisecond=1336 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 23:57:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 471 transitions.
Computed a total of 44 stabilizing places and 44 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 213 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 213 transition count 447
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 213 transition count 347
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 160 rules in 15 ms. Remains 207 /237 variables (removed 30) and now considering 341/471 (removed 130) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-30 23:57:33] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:57:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 288 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:57:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 17/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 17/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 54/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 616 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60251ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60252ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/237 places, 341/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60560 ms. Remains : 207/237 places, 341/471 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:58:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:58:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16329368432515064068.gal : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18366336822476284838.ctl : 19 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16329368432515064068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18366336822476284838.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.0054e+10,29.7361,795240,2,29618,5,3.14417e+06,6,0,1171,3.85377e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7319419750994420573.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7319419750994420573.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7319419750994420573.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7319419750994420573.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7319419750994420573.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 455 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 65 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17750359280985855420.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4568123412036537072.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17750359280985855420.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4568123412036537072.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.0054e+10,0.05802,6124,537,102,3315,648,504,4248,88,1961,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(EX((i8.i1.u39.p139!=1)) U A(AG(EX(TRUE)) U ((i4.i1.u24.p79==0)||(i9.i0.u50.p157==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!((E(!(((i4.i1.u24.p79==0)||(i9.i0.u50.p157==1))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(TR...944
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t195, t204, t219, t254, t274, t294, t338, i0.i2.u64.t32, i0.i2.u64.t35, i0.i2.u64.t36, i0.i2....721
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,4.63752,181996,1,0,432857,2683,3714,447211,456,15794,506700
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 215 transition count 449
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 215 transition count 449
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 215 transition count 349
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 210 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 210 transition count 344
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 209 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 209 transition count 343
Applied a total of 156 rules in 14 ms. Remains 209 /237 variables (removed 28) and now considering 343/471 (removed 128) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 343 rows 209 cols
[2025-05-30 23:59:09] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:59:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 168 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 268 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 342 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:59:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 5/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 343/552 variables, 209/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 3/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 552/552 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 342/342 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 44/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 18/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 343/552 variables, 209/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 342/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 4/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 552/552 variables, and 633 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 342/342 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 60194ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 342 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60196ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 209/237 places, 343/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60480 ms. Remains : 209/237 places, 343/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 343 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15826403484024965609.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14844515671635894712.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15826403484024965609.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14844515671635894712.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6662039704684048559.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6662039704684048559.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6662039704684048559.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6662039704684048559.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6662039704684048559.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:00:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:00:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:00:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 446 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:00:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9383345966806251925.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10827050181754083069.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9383345966806251925.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10827050181754083069.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.5224e+10,0.06993,6804,512,105,5151,1029,482,6902,84,2774,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG((AF((i4.u18.p62==1)) + !(((i6.u32.p106==0)||(i14.u73.p249==1))))) * (i5.i0.u17.p63==0)) U !(((EX(!((((i15.i2.u74.p252==0)||(i1.i1.u...251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((EX(!((((i15.i2.u74.p252==0)||(i1.i1.u7.p29==1))&&((i5.i1.u22.p64==0)||(i2.i0.u9.p37==1)))))...606
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t197, t199, t224, t249, t274, t289, t340, i0.u62.t33, i0.u62.t36, i0.u62.t37, i0.u62.t38, i3....682
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 219 transition count 453
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 219 transition count 453
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 219 transition count 353
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 218 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 218 transition count 352
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 217 transition count 351
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 217 transition count 351
Applied a total of 140 rules in 22 ms. Remains 217 /237 variables (removed 20) and now considering 351/471 (removed 120) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 351 rows 217 cols
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 350 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:01:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/217 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 15/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 15/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 351/568 variables, 217/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/568 variables, 5/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 1.0)
(t1 1.0)
(t2 1.0)
(t3 1.0)
(t4 1.0)
(t5 1.0)
(t6 1.0)
(t7 1.0)
(t8 1.0)
(t9 1.0)
(t10 0.0)
(t11 0.0)
(t12 0.0)
(t13 0.0)
(t14 0.0)
(t15 0.0)
(t16 0.0)
(t17 0.0)
(t18 0.0)
(t19 0.0)
(t20 0.0)
(t21 0.0)
(t22 1.0)
(t23 1.0)
(t24 1.0)
(t25 1.0)
(t26 0.0)
(t27 0.0)
(t28 0.0)
(t29 0.0)
(t30 0.0)
(t31 0.0)
(t32 1.0)
(t33 1.0)
(t34 1.0)
(t35 0.0)
(t36 0.0)
(t37 1.0)
(t38 1.0)
(t39 0.0)
(t40 1.0)
(t41 1.0)
(t42 0.0)
(t43 0.0)
(t44 0.0)
(t45 0.0)
(t46 0.0)
(t47 0.0)
(t48 0.0)
(t49 0.0)
(t50 0.0)
(t51 0.0)
(t52 0.0)
(t53 0.0)
(t54 2.0)
(t55 0.0)
(t56 0.0)
(t57 1.0)
(t58 1.0)
(t59 1.0)
(t60 1.0)
(t61 1.0)
(t62 1.0)
(t63 1.0)
(t64 1.0)
(t65 1.0)
(t66 1.0)
(t67 1.0)
(t68 1.0)
(t69 0.0)
(t70 0.0)
(t71 0.0)
(t72 0.0)
(t73 0.0)
(t74 0.0)
(t75 0.0)
(t76 0.0)
(t77 0.0)
(t78 0.0)
(t79 0.0)
(t80 0.0)
(t81 0.0)
(t82 0.0)
(t83 0.0)
(t84 0.0)
(t85 0.0)
(t86 0.0)
(t87 0.0)
(t88 0.0)
(t89 0.0)
(t90 0.0)
(t91 0.0)
(t92 1.0)
(t93 1.0)
(t94 1.0)
(t95 0.0)
(t96 1.0)
(t97 1.0)
(t98 0.0)
(t99 0.0)
(t100 1.0)
(t101 1.0)
(t102 0.0)
(t103 0.0)
(t104 1.0)
(t105 0.0)
(t106 0.0)
(t107 0.0)
(t108 0.0)
(t109 0.0)
(t110 0.0)
(t111 0.0)
(t112 0.0)
(t113 0.0)
(t114 0.0)
(t115 0.0)
(t116 0.0)
(t117 0.0)
(t118 0.0)
(t119 0.0)
(t120 0.0)
(t121 1.0)
(t122 1.0)
(t123 1.0)
(t124 0.0)
(t125 0.0)
(t126 0.0)
(t127 0.0)
(t128 0.0)
(t129 0.0)
(t130 0.0)
(t131 0.0)
(t132 0.0)
(t133 0.0)
(t134 0.0)
(t135 0.0)
(t136 0.0)
(t137 0.0)
(t138 0.0)
(t139 0.0)
(t140 0.0)
(t141 1.0)
(t142 1.0)
(t143 0.0)
(t144 0.0)
(t145 0.0)
(t146 0.0)
(t147 1.0)
(t148 1.0)
(t149 1.0)
(t150 1.0)
(t151 0.0)
(t152 0.0)
(t153 0.0)
(t154 0.0)
(t155 0.0)
(t156 0.0)
(t157 0.0)
(t158 0.0)
(t159 0.0)
(t160 0.0)
(t161 0.0)
(t162 0.0)
(t163 0.0)
(t164 0.0)
(t165 0.0)
(t166 0.0)
(t167 0.0)
(t168 0.0)
(t169 0.0)
(t170 1.0)
(t171 0.0)
(t172 0.0)
(t173 0.0)
(t174 0.0)
(t175 1.0)
(t176 1.0)
(t177 0.0)
(t178 0.0)
(t179 0.0)
(t180 0.0)
(t181 0.0)
(t182 0.0)
(t183 0.0)
(t184 0.0)
(t185 0.0)
(t186 0.0)
(t187 0.0)
(t188 0.0)
(t189 0.0)
(t190 0.0)
(t191 0.0)
(t192 0.0)
(t193 0.0)
(t194 1.0)
(t195 1.0)
(t196 0.0)
(t197 0.0)
(t198 0.0)
(t199 0.0)
(t200 1.0)
(t201 0.0)
(t202 0.0)
(t203 1.0)
(t204 1.0)
(t205 2.0)
(t206 0.0)
(t207 0.0)
(t208 0.0)
(t209 0.0)
(t210 0.0)
(t211 0.0)
(t212 0.0)
(t213 0.0)
(t214 0.0)
(t215 0.0)
(t216 0.0)
(t217 0.0)
(t218 0.0)
(t219 0.0)
(t220 0.0)
(t221 0.0)
(t222 0.0)
(t223 0.0)
(t224 0.0)
(t225 0.0)
(t226 0.0)
(t227 0.0)
(t228 0.0)
(t229 0.0)
(t230 0.0)
(t231 0.0)
(t232 0.0)
(t233 0.0)
(t234 0.0)
(t235 0.0)
(t236 0.0)
(t237 0.0)
(t238 0.0)
(t239 0.0)
(t240 0.0)
(t241 0.0)
(t242 0.0)
(t243 0.0)
(t244 0.0)
(t245 0.0)
(t246 0.0)
(t247 0.0)
(t248 0.0)
(t249 0.0)
(t250 0.0)
(t251 0.0)
(t252 0.0)
(t253 0.0)
(t254 0.0)
(t255 0.0)
(t256 0.0)
(t257 0.0)
(t258 0.0)
(t259 0.0)
(t260 0.0)
(t261 0.0)
(t262 0.0)
(t263 0.0)
(t264 0.0)
(t265 0.0)
(t266 0.0)
(t267 0.0)
(t268 0.0)
(t269 0.0)
(t270 0.0)
(t271 0.0)
(t272 timeout
0.0)
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 568/568 variables, and 282 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 217/217 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 350/350 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/217 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 50/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 351/568 variables, 217/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/568 variables, 350/627 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/568 variables, 1/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/568 variables, 1/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60195ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 350 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60197ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 217/237 places, 351/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60472 ms. Remains : 217/237 places, 351/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 351 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18322737654035935701.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3330972990146594791.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18322737654035935701.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3330972990146594791.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10201045998023145969.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10201045998023145969.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10201045998023145969.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10201045998023145969.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10201045998023145969.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 456 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15044229696636947619.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4966143683500628859.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15044229696636947619.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4966143683500628859.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.4763e+10,0.072003,6932,593,98,4881,745,510,7754,88,3178,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EX((i11.i0.u52.p163==0)) * E(!(E(((i12.i1.u67.p201==0)||(i3.i1.u21.p70==1)) U (i3.i0.u19.p66==1))) U ((AF((i12.i0.u64.p196==1)) * (i...411
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * (EX((i11.i0.u52.p163==0)) * E(!(E(((i12.i1.u67.p201==0)||(i3.i1.u21.p70==1)) U (i3.i0.u19.p66==1))...468
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t204, t210, t230, t265, t285, t305, t307, t348, i1.i1.t195, i1.i1.u9.t175, i1.i1.u18.t176, i2...729
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,8.84404,312980,1,0,642191,4223,3989,899212,480,28895,684472
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 221 edges and 237 vertex of which 4 / 237 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 99 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 99 transitions
Performed 99 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 99
Iterating post reduction 0 with 99 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 234 transition count 369
Reduce places removed 99 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 1 with 129 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 135 transition count 339
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 118 transition count 338
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 117 transition count 338
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 117 transition count 331
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 110 transition count 331
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 95 transition count 316
Iterating global reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 95 transition count 316
Ensure Unique test removed 101 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 101 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 394 place count 95 transition count 214
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 94 transition count 214
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 94 transition count 213
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 93 transition count 213
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 401 place count 89 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 89 transition count 197
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 89 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 86 transition count 191
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 470 place count 58 transition count 163
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 477 place count 51 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 8 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 51 transition count 123
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 51 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 487 place count 50 transition count 121
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 488 place count 50 transition count 120
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 490 place count 48 transition count 118
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 491 place count 47 transition count 118
Applied a total of 491 rules in 48 ms. Remains 47 /237 variables (removed 190) and now considering 118/471 (removed 353) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 47 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:49] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:02:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned [41, 46]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/237 places, 118/471 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 45 transition count 117
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 44 transition count 117
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 44 transition count 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 43 transition count 116
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 43 /45 variables (removed 2) and now considering 116/118 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 43 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:49] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 43/237 places, 116/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 361 ms. Remains : 43/237 places, 116/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 530 steps (29 resets) in 20 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10322884115946080694.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7386251856859503093.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10322884115946080694.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7386251856859503093.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 214 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 214 transition count 448
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 214 transition count 348
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 210 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 210 transition count 344
Applied a total of 154 rules in 10 ms. Remains 210 /237 variables (removed 27) and now considering 344/471 (removed 127) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 344 rows 210 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 256 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 343 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 16/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 8/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 3/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 344/554 variables, 210/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/554 variables, 5/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 554/554 variables, and 292 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 343/343 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 67/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 344/554 variables, 210/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/554 variables, 343/631 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/554 variables, 5/636 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/554 variables, 2/638 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 554/554 variables, and 638 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 343/343 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60169ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 343 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60173ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 210/237 places, 344/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60442 ms. Remains : 210/237 places, 344/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 344 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4744134155449834023.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality396525825387456530.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4744134155449834023.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality396525825387456530.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18420412147341213725.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18420412147341213725.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18420412147341213725.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18420412147341213725.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18420412147341213725.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 452 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2808660810907764674.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality362829665966216769.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2808660810907764674.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality362829665966216769.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.47101e+10,0.113781,8740,597,103,8888,1245,500,12992,81,3931,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(EX((i7.u38.p118==1))) U EF(((AG(EF((((i14.i0.u72.p236==0)||(i8.i0.u35.p95==0))||(i8.i0.u31.p99==1)))) + AX((((i0.u2.p9==0)||(i10.i1....264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,EX(EX((i7.u38.p118==1)))),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((i14.i0.u72.p236==0)||(i8.i0.u35.p9...472
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t197, t204, t224, t254, t274, t294, t341, i0.t195, i1.u65.t34, i1.u65.t37, i1.u65.t38, i1.u65...712
(forward)formula 0,1,0.399178,20004,1,0,34325,2084,3811,44750,437,6806,98852
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 216 transition count 450
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 216 transition count 450
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 216 transition count 350
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 212 transition count 346
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 212 transition count 346
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 211 transition count 345
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 211 transition count 345
Applied a total of 152 rules in 13 ms. Remains 211 /237 variables (removed 26) and now considering 345/471 (removed 126) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 345 rows 211 cols
[2025-05-31 00:04:21] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:04:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 247 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 344 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:04:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/211 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 17/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 17/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 12/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 345/556 variables, 211/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/556 variables, 5/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 556/556 variables, and 292 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 211/211 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 344/344 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/211 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 66/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 345/556 variables, 211/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/556 variables, 344/631 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/556 variables, 1/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/556 variables, 5/637 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 556/556 variables, and 637 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 211/211 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 344/344 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60206ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 344 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60207ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 211/237 places, 345/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60469 ms. Remains : 211/237 places, 345/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 345 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality186365097583318252.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11520550483639604340.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality186365097583318252.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11520550483639604340.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15279015786957689182.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15279015786957689182.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15279015786957689182.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15279015786957689182.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15279015786957689182.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 452 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2129666236820535523.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8029633851948945806.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2129666236820535523.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8029633851948945806.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.38258e+10,0.064317,6156,535,102,3598,660,526,4966,80,2117,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((AG(((i7.i1.u43.p139==0)&&(i4.u19.p62==1))) + AF(E(AX(((i11.i1.u63.p202==0)||(i7.i1.u42.p125==1))) U (i2.i0.u13.p33==0)))) + ((i2.i0...396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i2.i0.u12.p40==0)||((i14.i1.u69.p222==0)&&(i15.i1.u77.p247==1))))) * !(!(E(TRUE U...527
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t198, t209, t229, t259, t274, t299, t342, i1.u15.t172, i1.u15.t175, i1.u16.t173, i2.i1.t189, ...725
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,1,6.04442,214924,1,0,446491,3683,3853,590516,431,24842,475615
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 213 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 213 transition count 447
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 213 transition count 347
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 160 rules in 11 ms. Remains 207 /237 variables (removed 30) and now considering 341/471 (removed 130) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:05:57] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:05:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 237 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 11/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 7/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 2/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 45/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/603 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/604 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 3/607 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60166ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60168ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/237 places, 341/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60417 ms. Remains : 207/237 places, 341/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1878056585644933562.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:06:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5014621641445066107.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1878056585644933562.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5014621641445066107.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14269933110074011447.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14269933110074011447.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14269933110074011447.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14269933110074011447.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14269933110074011447.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 447 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8966477861415506957.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6838648351745504070.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8966477861415506957.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6838648351745504070.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.0054e+10,0.115097,8812,580,103,8834,1218,474,14551,83,5821,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(FALSE)) * E(!(EG(((EG(((i3.i0.u14.p42==0)||(i9.i1.u38.p141==1))) + (((i9.i0.u43.p136==0)||(i3.i0.u14.p33==1))&&((i13.i0.u61.p195==...290
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U !(EX(!(FALSE))))),!(EG(((EG(((i3.i0.u14.p42==0)||(i9.i1.u38.p141==1))) + (((i9.i0.u4...352
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t195, t203, t218, t253, t268, t293, t338, i0.u58.t32, i0.u58.t35, i0.u58.t36, i0.u58.t37, i1....694
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,27.2947,745332,1,0,1.36837e+06,5754,3577,1.74577e+06,472,55320,1359019
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 212 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 212 transition count 446
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 212 transition count 346
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 207 transition count 341
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 161 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 162 rules in 18 ms. Remains 206 /237 variables (removed 31) and now considering 340/471 (removed 131) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:07:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:07:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 255 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:07:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60167ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60168ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/237 places, 340/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60442 ms. Remains : 206/237 places, 340/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 340 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2917574743754506532.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:08:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5836285034592503454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2917574743754506532.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5836285034592503454.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1106879057022201591.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1106879057022201591.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1106879057022201591.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1106879057022201591.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1106879057022201591.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 449 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 31 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5003281299120018877.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13959379250861084073.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5003281299120018877.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13959379250861084073.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.84316e+10,0.133624,9132,699,103,9222,1258,514,15951,81,5731,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((i3.i1.u15.p46==0)||(i1.i0.u4.p18==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((i3.i1.u15.p46==0)||(i1.i0.u4.p18==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t194, t196, t221, t251, t266, t291, t337, i0.u57.t32, i0.u57.t35, i0.u57.t36, i0.u57.t37, i2....736
(forward)formula 0,0,0.343191,17708,1,0,30241,1442,2618,41986,391,5731,84580
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 179 edges and 237 vertex of which 4 / 237 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 73 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 73 transitions
Performed 73 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 73
Iterating post reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 235 transition count 396
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 162 transition count 383
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 156 transition count 373
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 146 transition count 371
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 145 transition count 371
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 145 transition count 363
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 137 transition count 363
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 123 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 123 transition count 349
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 123 transition count 345
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 122 transition count 345
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 122 transition count 343
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 120 transition count 343
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 118 transition count 332
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 118 transition count 332
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 88 transition count 302
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 311 place count 83 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 83 transition count 248
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 83 transition count 248
Applied a total of 322 rules in 46 ms. Remains 83 /237 variables (removed 154) and now considering 248/471 (removed 223) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 248 rows 83 cols
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned [75, 82]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/237 places, 248/471 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 81 transition count 247
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 80 transition count 247
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 80 /81 variables (removed 1) and now considering 247/248 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 247 rows 80 cols
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/237 places, 247/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 444 ms. Remains : 80/237 places, 247/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 247 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14141256423826158696.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13695695703485801532.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14141256423826158696.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13695695703485801532.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.21431e+07,2.98699,97832,2,6054,5,225470,6,0,565,226553,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(((((p233!=1)||(p224==1))||(((p119==0)||(p105==1))&&((p74==0)||(p134==1)))) * (((EF(((p0==0)||(p160==1))) + (p246==0)) + ((p92==1)||(...385
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((!((E(!(EG(((p246==0)||(p156==1)))) U (!(((p151==0)||(p108==1))) * !(EG(((p246==0)||(p156==1)...909
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t7, t12, t13, t20, t22, t24, t28, t30, t36, t39, t41, t46, t47, t55, t56, t57, t66, t...1071
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17870766251613437986.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17870766251613437986.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17870766251613437986.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17870766251613437986.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17870766251613437986.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 645 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5481482234848383105.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:09:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15913190472913326155.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5481482234848383105.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15913190472913326155.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.21431e+07,0.031125,5040,196,65,2009,434,252,3497,88,1199,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(((((i8.u28.p233!=1)||(i8.u26.p224==1))||(((u14.p119==0)||(i3.u12.p105==1))&&((i2.i0.u7.p74==0)||(i4.u16.p134==1)))) * (((EF(((i2.i1....579
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((!((E(!(EG(((i8.u27.p246==0)||(i5.u20.p156==1)))) U (!(((i4.u18.p151==0)||(i3.u13.p108==1))) ...1287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t66, t70, t82, t86, t118, t128, t138, t148, t158, t168, t178, t188, t208, t218, t228, t246, u...501
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,3.23065,139184,1,0,267813,2534,1643,447425,490,14140,278894
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 212 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 212 transition count 446
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 212 transition count 346
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 207 transition count 341
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 161 place count 206 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 206 transition count 340
Applied a total of 162 rules in 8 ms. Remains 206 /237 variables (removed 31) and now considering 340/471 (removed 131) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 206 cols
[2025-05-31 00:10:01] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:10:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 250 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 339 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:10:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 5/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 57/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 340/546 variables, 206/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 339/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 2/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 339/339 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60198ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 339 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60198ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/237 places, 340/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60457 ms. Remains : 206/237 places, 340/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 340 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11287172198963015894.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7210250156305552232.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11287172198963015894.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7210250156305552232.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8366047092624788845.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8366047092624788845.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8366047092624788845.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8366047092624788845.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8366047092624788845.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 453 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7347223814902508643.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12217487093383123142.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7347223814902508643.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12217487093383123142.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.84316e+10,0.075096,7028,617,105,5672,672,470,7713,81,2252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((i2.u15.p49==1) U !(E(EX(TRUE) U !(EG(((i4.i1.u28.p90==0)||(i2.u15.p48==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(EX(TRUE) U !(EG(((i4.i1.u28.p90==0)||(i2.u15.p48==1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(EX(TRUE) U !(EG((...299
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t194, t199, t219, t249, t274, t294, t337, i0.t192, i3.t185, i3.u10.t165, i3.u16.t169, i3.u16....710
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,0,19.3734,682076,1,0,1.42568e+06,3770,3358,1.82559e+06,455,21025,1593027
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 213 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 213 transition count 447
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 213 transition count 347
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 160 rules in 19 ms. Remains 207 /237 variables (removed 30) and now considering 341/471 (removed 130) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:11:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:11:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:11:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 7/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 3/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 12/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 282 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 60/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 2/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/619 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/624 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 625 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60191ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60193ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/237 places, 341/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60461 ms. Remains : 207/237 places, 341/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:12:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:12:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12501786455066900025.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:12:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12854045281107447687.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12501786455066900025.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12854045281107447687.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15407809162562342323.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15407809162562342323.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15407809162562342323.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15407809162562342323.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15407809162562342323.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 448 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7381448365496429603.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9652078822392140208.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7381448365496429603.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9652078822392140208.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.93301e+10,0.057282,5988,496,105,3376,599,491,4190,86,1475,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((i13.u64.p210==1)) + EG(((i10.u54.p177==0)&&(i6.u35.p116==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((i13.u64.p210==1)))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((i10.u54.p177==0)&&(i6.u35....176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t195, t204, t254, t269, t294, t338, i1.u15.t170, i1.u15.t173, i1.u16.t171, i2.i1.t186, i2.i1....711
(forward)formula 0,1,0.205805,13028,1,0,19672,1038,2832,26132,402,2364,58145
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 471/471 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 213 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 213 transition count 447
Ensure Unique test removed 100 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 100 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 213 transition count 347
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 208 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 208 transition count 342
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 207 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 207 transition count 341
Applied a total of 160 rules in 9 ms. Remains 207 /237 variables (removed 30) and now considering 341/471 (removed 130) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 341 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-31 00:13:22] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:13:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 340 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:13:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 9/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 3/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 280 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/207 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 58/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 3/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 3/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 341/548 variables, 207/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 340/627 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 629 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 207/207 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 340/340 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60190ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 340 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60191ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/237 places, 341/471 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60463 ms. Remains : 207/237 places, 341/471 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:14:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 341 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:14:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10755123832709261865.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10132308145318728651.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10755123832709261865.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10132308145318728651.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4666271260394551717.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4666271260394551717.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4666271260394551717.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4666271260394551717.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4666271260394551717.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 448 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 28 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11976234459726091290.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3356871701184214732.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11976234459726091290.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3356871701184214732.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.84316e+10,0.134931,10136,519,125,11000,1296,475,19450,89,6471,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(((AX(E(((i4.u15.p57==0)||(i0.u61.p208==1)) U (i1.u1.p5==1))) + (i4.u14.p52==0)) + (i8.u32.p117==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((!(EX(!(E(((i4.u15.p57==0)||(i0.u61.p208==1)) U (i1.u1.p5==1))))) + (i4.u14.p52==0)) ...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t194, t197, t222, t247, t267, t292, t338, i0.u61.t32, i0.u61.t35, i0.u61.t36, i0.u61.t37, i1....726
(forward)formula 0,0,4.01786,154648,1,0,271059,7533,3004,466018,445,109819,395496
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1891915169064029865.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1891915169064029865.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1891915169064029865.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1891915169064029865.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1891915169064029865.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 712 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4439520109791284219.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:14:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1702283978533056271.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4439520109791284219.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1702283978533056271.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07809e+11,0.075034,6884,701,137,4647,1042,521,6798,102,4176,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG((AF((i2.u18.p62==1)) + !(((i5.u35.p106==0)||(i14.u89.p249==1))))) * (i2.u24.p63==0)) U !(((EX(!((((i13.i1.i1.u90.p252==0)||(i5.u7.p...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((EX(!((((i13.i1.i1.u90.p252==0)||(i5.u7.p29==1))&&((i2.u23.p64==0)||(i1.u9.p37==1))))) + (i1...588
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t94, t218, t221, t229, t329, t379, t468, i1.t211, i1.u8.t190, i1.u15.t194, i1.u15.t195, i1.u1...766
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,27.3101,818284,1,0,1.61241e+06,6295,3804,2.44061e+06,621,82332,1561478
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 1147401 ms.

BK_STOP 1748650524315

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-05b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729800673"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-05b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;