Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729700657.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-04b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729700657
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748648582700

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-04b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 23:43:03] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 23:43:03] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 92 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Transformed 221 places.
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Transformed 368 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 221 places and 368 transitions and 1658 arcs in 186 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 109 out of 221 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 221/221 places, 368/368 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 214 transition count 361
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 214 transition count 361
Applied a total of 14 rules in 30 ms. Remains 214 /221 variables (removed 7) and now considering 361/368 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 361 rows 214 cols
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 26 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 251 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 204 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 486 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 360 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 360 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/214 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 360 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 360 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 6/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 360 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 12/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 360 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 4/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 360 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 360 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD335 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 361/575 variables, 214/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 4/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 575/575 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 214/214 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 360/360 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/214 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 43/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 361/575 variables, 214/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 358/624 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 4/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 575/575 variables, and 629 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 214/214 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 358/360 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 60438ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 358 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 60450ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 214/221 places, 359/368 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 213 transition count 359
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 213 /214 variables (removed 1) and now considering 359/359 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 359 rows 213 cols
[2025-05-30 23:44:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:44:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 213/221 places, 359/368 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61204 ms. Remains : 213/221 places, 359/368 transitions.
Support contains 109 out of 213 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 23:44:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 359 transitions.
Support contains 108 out of 213 places (down from 109) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (72 resets) in 1114 ms. (35 steps per ms) remains 7/81 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (19 resets) in 354 ms. (112 steps per ms) remains 5/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (18 resets) in 206 ms. (193 steps per ms) remains 2/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (51 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (42 resets) in 114 ms. (347 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-05-30 23:44:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 102/108 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 105/213 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 359/572 variables, 213/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/572 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 572/572 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 185 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 213/213 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 102/108 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 105/213 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 149 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 359/572 variables, 213/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 2/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/572 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 572/572 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 861 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 213/213 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1054ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 26 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 213 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 200 edges and 213 vertex of which 4 / 213 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 573 edges and 211 vertex of which 204 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 93 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 93 transitions
Performed 93 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 93
Iterating post reduction 0 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 204 transition count 255
Reduce places removed 93 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 1 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 111 transition count 226
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 95 transition count 226
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 95 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 90 transition count 221
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 76 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 76 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 76 transition count 143
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 76 transition count 142
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 75 transition count 142
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 343 place count 71 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 71 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 71 transition count 123
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 68 transition count 123
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 42 transition count 97
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 413 place count 37 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 37 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 37 transition count 72
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -13
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 36 transition count 85
Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 36 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 429 place count 32 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 31 transition count 80
Applied a total of 430 rules in 60 ms. Remains 31 /213 variables (removed 182) and now considering 80/359 (removed 279) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 60 ms. Remains : 31/213 places, 80/359 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 9414 steps (248 resets) in 36 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 359 transitions.
Computed a total of 44 stabilizing places and 44 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 188 transition count 334
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 188 transition count 334
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 182 transition count 328
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 182 transition count 328
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 181 transition count 327
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 181 transition count 327
Applied a total of 64 rules in 25 ms. Remains 181 /213 variables (removed 32) and now considering 327/359 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 327 rows 181 cols
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 326 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:44:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 12/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 327/508 variables, 181/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 3/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 4/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 508/508 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 326/326 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 35/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 327/508 variables, 181/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 326/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 4/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 4/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 508/508 variables, and 563 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 326/326 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 60229ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 326 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60232ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 181/213 places, 327/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60472 ms. Remains : 181/213 places, 327/359 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:45:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 327 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:45:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9470579107341923958.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12292640821043903476.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9470579107341923958.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12292640821043903476.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.89707e+09,10.5059,252824,2,16537,5,919065,6,0,1053,1.1658e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(!(AX(!(((p147==0)||(p198==1))))) U ((!(AF(((p127==0)||(p4==1)))) * E((p195==1) U EG(((p84==0)||(p49==1))))) * E(AF((p32==1)) U A((p1...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!(!(EX(!(!(((p147==0)||(p198==1))))))) U ((!(!(EG(!(((p127==0)||(p4==1)))))) * E((p195==1) U EG(((p...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t61, t62, t65, t66, t68, t81, t87, t88, t91, t93, t94...514
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5182934754132433552.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5182934754132433552.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5182934754132433552.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5182934754132433552.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5182934754132433552.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 394 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 333 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12541153672531812742.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9013245672443561134.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12541153672531812742.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9013245672443561134.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.89707e+09,0.069035,6780,603,101,5505,908,443,5775,89,2254,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(!(AX(!(((i10.u46.p147==0)||(i15.i1.u68.p198==1))))) U ((!(AF(((i9.i0.u40.p127==0)||(u2.p4==1)))) * E((i13.u60.p195==1) U EG(((i5.u27...255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!(!(EX(!(!(((i10.u46.p147==0)||(i15.i1.u68.p198==1))))))) U ((!(!(EG(!(((i9.i0.u40.p127==0)||(u2.p4...375
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t167, t169, t180, t212, t236, t324, u2.t170, i2.i1.t140, i2.i1.t160, i2.i1.u10.t159, i2.i1.u1...651
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,23.0229,779772,1,0,1.6977e+06,6748,3051,1.84037e+06,511,61965,1980324
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 191 transition count 337
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 191 transition count 337
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 191 transition count 273
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 184 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 184 transition count 266
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 183 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 183 transition count 265
Applied a total of 124 rules in 14 ms. Remains 183 /213 variables (removed 30) and now considering 265/359 (removed 94) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 265 rows 183 cols
[2025-05-30 23:46:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:46:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 192 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 278 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 264 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:46:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 14/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 3/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 265/448 variables, 183/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 3/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/448 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 448/448 variables, and 236 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved in 29907 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 183/183 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 264/264 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 40/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 265/448 variables, 183/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 264/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 2/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 4/502 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/503 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 448/448 variables, and 506 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 183/183 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 264/264 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60007ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 264 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60008ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 183/213 places, 265/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60305 ms. Remains : 183/213 places, 265/359 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:47:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 265 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:47:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18445562243623663817.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16364962574320596226.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18445562243623663817.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16364962574320596226.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69483e+09,6.60021,186860,2,16571,5,696160,6,0,999,877509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p110==0)||(p61==1)) U (E(!((((p1==1)||(p65==0))||(p137==1))) U (p27==1)) * (EF(EG(((p24==0)||(p68==1)))) + !((!(((p171==0)||(p117==1)...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((E(!((((p1==1)||(p65==0))||(p137==1))) U (p27==1)) * (E(TRUE U EG(((p24==0)||(p68==1)))) + !((!...596
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t25, t29, t33, t36, t37, t39, t63, t64, t67, t68, t70, t73, t84, t90, t91, t94...446
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15940698442363063736.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15940698442363063736.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15940698442363063736.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15940698442363063736.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15940698442363063736.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 236 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18206056669017796541.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4741272851817042468.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18206056669017796541.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4741272851817042468.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69483e+09,0.072251,6960,497,97,5740,736,487,7736,76,2409,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i7.u35.p110==0)||(i5.i1.u19.p61==1)) U (E(!((((i1.i0.u0.p1==1)||(i5.i1.u21.p65==0))||(i8.i1.u47.p137==1))) U (i1.i1.u8.p27==1)) * (EF...302
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((E(!((((i1.i0.u0.p1==1)||(i5.i1.u21.p65==0))||(i8.i1.u47.p137==1))) U (i1.i1.u8.p27==1)) * (E(T...895
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t172, t181, t193, t209, t239, t262, i0.t170, i2.i0.u15.t147, i2.i0.u15.t150, i2.i0.u16.t148, ...668
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,14.247,466864,1,0,892289,3686,3345,1.19028e+06,409,26021,1037277
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 187 transition count 333
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 187 transition count 333
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 187 transition count 269
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 180 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 180 transition count 262
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 179 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 179 transition count 261
Applied a total of 132 rules in 19 ms. Remains 179 /213 variables (removed 34) and now considering 261/359 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 261 rows 179 cols
[2025-05-30 23:47:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:47:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 260 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:47:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 11/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 261/440 variables, 179/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 4/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/440 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 440/440 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 24056 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 35/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 261/440 variables, 179/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 260/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 4/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 5/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 440/440 variables, and 492 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 54134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54136ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 179/213 places, 261/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54380 ms. Remains : 179/213 places, 261/359 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:48:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 261 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:48:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality159535616161616519.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6252468485802312912.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality159535616161616519.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6252468485802312912.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.39231e+09,6.57712,178948,2,14412,5,695615,6,0,979,840705,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AF((p154==1))) + (!(E(AF((p162==1)) U AF((p134==1)))) * (EG(((p87==0)||(p154==1))) + EF((p219==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((p154==1))))))))),!(EG(!((p162==1))))) * !(EG(!((p134==1)))))] = FALSE * [(((Ini...260
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t37, t38, t52, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t82, t88, t89, t92, t93...448
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4581459328108713093.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4581459328108713093.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4581459328108713093.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4581459328108713093.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4581459328108713093.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 237 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10087499836059691289.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14718182510151965071.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10087499836059691289.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14718182510151965071.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.39231e+09,0.184739,7748,594,103,7504,828,452,10204,82,2609,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AF((i11.u52.p154==1))) + (!(E(AF((i10.i0.u48.p162==1)) U AF((i8.i1.u41.p134==1)))) * (EG(((i4.i1.u25.p87==0)||(i11.u52.p154==1))) + E...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((i11.u52.p154==1))))))))),!(EG(!((i10.i0.u48.p162==1))))) * !(EG(!((i8.i1.u41.p1...326
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t168, t177, t189, t209, t233, i0.t166, i2.i0.t159, i2.i0.u8.t139, i2.i0.u16.t140, i3.u14.t143...617
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,16.4538,546756,1,0,1.09923e+06,3503,3129,1.41399e+06,443,23547,1227512
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 189 transition count 335
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 189 transition count 335
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 189 transition count 271
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 185 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 185 transition count 267
Applied a total of 120 rules in 9 ms. Remains 185 /213 variables (removed 28) and now considering 267/359 (removed 92) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 267 rows 185 cols
[2025-05-30 23:49:28] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 219 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:49:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 189 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 410 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 266 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:49:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/185 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 19/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 267/452 variables, 185/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 4/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/452 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 452/452 variables, and 243 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved in 29590 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 266/266 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/185 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 267/452 variables, 185/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 266/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 4/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 2/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 452/452 variables, and 511 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 266/266 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 59668ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 266 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59669ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/213 places, 267/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60090 ms. Remains : 185/213 places, 267/359 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 267 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4347035016133528904.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7479639787203469403.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4347035016133528904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7479639787203469403.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69741e+09,8.17616,183716,2,14396,5,685664,6,0,1009,864803,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EF(((((p6==0)||(p26==1))&&(p201==1))&&((p142==1)&&((p205==0)||(p32==1)))))) U AG((EG(!(E((p214==1) U (p188==1)))) + ((EG((p38==0)) * ...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((EG(!(E((p214==1) U (p188==1)))) + ((EG((p38==0)) * !(EX(!((p163==1))))) * ((p163=...598
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, t18, t26, t35, t38, t39, t40, t64, t65, t68, t69, t71, t84, t90, t91, t94, t95, t97...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13052488116504498800.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13052488116504498800.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13052488116504498800.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13052488116504498800.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13052488116504498800.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 246 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8594037441655468030.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13595015611635930615.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8594037441655468030.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13595015611635930615.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69741e+09,0.063708,6576,566,100,4683,580,466,6258,73,1859,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EF(((((i0.u1.p6==0)||(i4.i0.u8.p26==1))&&(i13.i0.u64.p201==1))&&((i10.u47.p142==1)&&((i13.i1.u66.p205==0)||(i4.i0.u11.p32==1)))))) U ...357
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((EG(!(E((i13.i1.u70.p214==1) U (i12.i0.u60.p188==1)))) + ((EG((i4.i1.u14.p38==0)) ...896
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t173, t177, t193, t209, t233, t264, i0.t171, i1.u56.t35, i1.u56.t38, i1.u56.t39, i1.u56.t40, ...640
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,19.1242,590000,1,0,1.23427e+06,3137,3521,1.47084e+06,409,18754,1471454
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 190 transition count 336
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 190 transition count 336
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 190 transition count 272
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 183 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 183 transition count 265
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 182 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 182 transition count 264
Applied a total of 126 rules in 18 ms. Remains 182 /213 variables (removed 31) and now considering 264/359 (removed 95) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 264 rows 182 cols
[2025-05-30 23:51:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:51:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 263 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:51:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 6/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 3/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 3/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 264/446 variables, 182/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 4/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/446 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/446 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 29911 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 38/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 264/446 variables, 182/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 263/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 4/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/446 variables, and 505 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 263/263 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 59997ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 263 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59999ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 182/213 places, 264/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60245 ms. Remains : 182/213 places, 264/359 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:52:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 264 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:52:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14956384270932386639.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2657688466086247848.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14956384270932386639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2657688466086247848.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57073e+09,9.15682,234532,2,17065,5,907308,6,0,994,1.1277e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((p61==1)) * EX(((((EF(((p146==0)||(p5==0))) * EX((p108==0))) + E(EX(((p129==0)||(p108==1))) U A(((p24==0)||(p123==1)) U (p0==1)))) +...261
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!((p61==1)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EX(((((E(TRUE U ((p146==0)||(p5==0))) * EX((p108==0))) + E(EX(((...417
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t61, t62, t65, t66, t68, t82, t88, t89, t92, t93, t95...461
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3088949430145559064.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3088949430145559064.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3088949430145559064.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3088949430145559064.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3088949430145559064.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 237 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality88127089492550068.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3358988566158655548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality88127089492550068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3358988566158655548.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57073e+09,0.077562,6708,498,114,5266,547,438,6922,82,1556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((i4.i0.u18.p61==1)) * EX(((((EF(((i10.u46.p146==0)||(i0.u2.p5==0))) * EX((i7.i1.u31.p108==0))) + E(EX(((i9.i0.u43.p129==0)||(i7.i1.u...388
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!((i4.i0.u18.p61==1)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EX(((((E(TRUE U ((i10.u46.p146==0)||(i0.u2.p5==0))) * ...558
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t170, t173, t189, t209, t233, t261, i0.t168, i0.u2.t171, i0.u2.t172, i3.t161, i3.u10.t141, i3...636
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,0,12.2287,424500,1,0,946049,3830,3412,1.00171e+06,461,26194,984405
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 194 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 194 transition count 340
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 191 transition count 337
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 191 transition count 337
Applied a total of 44 rules in 5 ms. Remains 191 /213 variables (removed 22) and now considering 337/359 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 337 rows 191 cols
[2025-05-30 23:53:00] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:53:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 254 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 336 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:53:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/191 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 14/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 337/528 variables, 191/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/528 variables, 4/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 528/528 variables, and 250 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 191/191 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 336/336 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/191 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 337/528 variables, 191/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/528 variables, 336/582 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/528 variables, 4/586 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 528/528 variables, and 589 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 191/191 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 336/336 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60234ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 336 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60235ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 191/213 places, 337/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60497 ms. Remains : 191/213 places, 337/359 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:54:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:54:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:54:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 337 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:54:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:54:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:54:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9670202138259514736.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:54:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2744042144037092069.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9670202138259514736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2744042144037092069.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.49765e+09,10.3246,265784,2,16822,5,985107,6,0,1103,1.20466e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(((p39==0) + A((p66==0) U ((p202==1)||((p55==1)&&((p96==0)||(p72==1))))))) U ((((p134==0)||(p52==0))||(p60==1)) * (EG(((EF((p188==0))...315
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((((p134==0)||(p52==0))||(p60==1)) * (EG(((E(TRUE U (p188==0)) + E(((p142==0)||(p124==1)) U (p1...995
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t26, t36, t40, t41, t67, t68, t71, t72, t74, t77, t88, t95, t96, t99, t100, t1...559
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3964415772304817213.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3964415772304817213.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3964415772304817213.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3964415772304817213.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3964415772304817213.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 399 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2942603815427547100.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:54:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality843494076015412090.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2942603815427547100.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality843494076015412090.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.49765e+09,0.068588,6700,593,97,4643,588,475,8039,85,1872,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(((i0.i0.u12.p39==0) + A((i3.i0.u18.p66==0) U ((i12.i0.u66.p202==1)||((i1.u17.p55==1)&&((i4.i0.u28.p96==0)||(i3.i1.u22.p72==1))))))) ...508
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((((i7.i0.u43.p134==0)||(i1.u15.p52==0))||(i3.i1.u22.p60==1)) * (EG(((E(TRUE U (i11.i0.u61.p188...1534
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t176, t178, t190, t254, t302, t334, i1.t169, i1.u9.t148, i1.u15.t152, i1.u15.t153, i1.u15.t15...632
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,29.7178,730312,1,0,1.31983e+06,9706,3444,2.23815e+06,516,114831,1183826
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 187 transition count 333
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 187 transition count 333
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 187 transition count 269
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 182 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 182 transition count 264
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 181 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 181 transition count 263
Applied a total of 128 rules in 5 ms. Remains 181 /213 variables (removed 32) and now considering 263/359 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 263 rows 181 cols
[2025-05-30 23:55:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:55:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 253 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:55:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 12/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 263/444 variables, 181/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 2/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 4/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/444 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 444/444 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 27145 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 37/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 263/444 variables, 181/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 262/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 3/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 4/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 3/502 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 444/444 variables, and 502 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 57254ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57256ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 181/213 places, 263/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57515 ms. Remains : 181/213 places, 263/359 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 263 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11159049488101764639.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:55:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2797603299376258255.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11159049488101764639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2797603299376258255.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.42912e+09,6.58802,189148,2,14226,5,698868,6,0,989,919606,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AG((EF((p139==1)) + E(((p220==0)&&(p94==1)) U A(((p124==0)||(p156==1)) U (p148==1))))) * ((p71==0)||(p164==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * ((p71==0)||(p164==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (p139==1)) + E(((p220==0)&&(p94==1)) U !((E(!((p14...244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t72, t83, t90, t91, t94, t95...460
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1158336526015750036.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1158336526015750036.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1158336526015750036.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1158336526015750036.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1158336526015750036.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 245 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 20 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7063693801551744861.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7487072252623725970.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7063693801551744861.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7487072252623725970.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.42912e+09,0.092415,7964,484,99,6659,908,459,13034,76,4516,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AG((EF((i10.i1.u45.p139==1)) + E(((i13.i1.u63.p220==0)&&(i8.i3.u30.p94==1)) U A(((i10.i2.u40.p124==0)||(i11.i1.u51.p156==1)) U (i10.i...220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * ((i5.i1.u23.p71==0)||(i11.i2.u54.p164==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (i10.i1.u45.p139==1)) + E(((i...352
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t170, t179, t191, t207, t235, t260, i0.u57.t32, i0.u57.t35, i0.u57.t36, i0.u57.t37, i2.i1.t16...661
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,5.237,185116,1,0,360417,3563,3100,475214,408,28345,390945
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 187 transition count 333
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 187 transition count 333
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 187 transition count 269
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 182 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 182 transition count 264
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 181 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 181 transition count 263
Applied a total of 128 rules in 15 ms. Remains 181 /213 variables (removed 32) and now considering 263/359 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 263 rows 181 cols
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 262 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:56:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 7/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 263/444 variables, 181/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 4/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/444 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 444/444 variables, and 237 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 26191 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 43/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 263/444 variables, 181/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 262/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 4/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 1/502 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 444/444 variables, and 505 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 262/262 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 56302ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 262 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56303ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 181/213 places, 263/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56557 ms. Remains : 181/213 places, 263/359 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:57:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 263 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:57:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17727370244042098392.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12169248341862306858.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17727370244042098392.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12169248341862306858.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.42912e+09,7.34802,201264,2,13901,5,751699,6,0,989,959056,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(EX((((p77==0)&&(p179==1))&&(p209==0)))) + (AX((p39==1)) * (AX(FALSE) + EF(((p151==0)||(p31==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(EX((((p77==0)&&(p179==1))&&(p209==0))))))) * !((p39==1)))] = FALSE * [(EY(((FwdU(I...274
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t81, t82, t88, t89, t92, t93...460
(forward)formula 0,0,19.1656,386120,1,0,477,1.88037e+06,550,254,7879,1.47938e+06,550
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 192 transition count 338
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 192 transition count 338
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 192 transition count 274
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 187 transition count 269
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 187 transition count 269
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 186 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 186 transition count 268
Applied a total of 118 rules in 6 ms. Remains 186 /213 variables (removed 27) and now considering 268/359 (removed 91) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 268 rows 186 cols
[2025-05-30 23:57:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:57:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 255 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 267 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:57:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 89 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 7/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 10/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 268/454 variables, 186/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/454 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 454/454 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved in 25556 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 267/267 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 268/454 variables, 186/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 267/512 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 3/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 454/454 variables, and 519 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 267/267 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 55638ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55639ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/213 places, 268/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55901 ms. Remains : 186/213 places, 268/359 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10072479855701067952.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:58:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11933015201573905597.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10072479855701067952.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11933015201573905597.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67701e+09,6.15804,180016,2,15191,5,674401,6,0,1014,834069,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!(E(((p84==0)&&((p132==0)||(p145==1))) U (((p171==0)||(p98==1))&&(p180==1)))) * EF(AX(AG(((p86==0)||(p156==1)))))) * (p61==1)) U (EX(...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EX((!(EG(!((((p97==0)||(p11==1))&&(p219==1))))) * E(TRUE U ((p103==0)&&(p119==1))))) + !((!(E(...700
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t34, t38, t40, t54, t64, t65, t68, t69, t71, t84, t92, t93, t96, t97, t99...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph521652351279611146.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph521652351279611146.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph521652351279611146.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph521652351279611146.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph521652351279611146.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 245 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4875399732321293510.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13234848799633855424.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4875399732321293510.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13234848799633855424.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67701e+09,0.088776,7352,469,96,5403,852,468,11825,75,4481,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!(E(((i5.u26.p84==0)&&((i10.i0.u42.p132==0)||(i9.u45.p145==1))) U (((i0.u56.p171==0)||(i7.i0.u32.p98==1))&&(i0.u58.p180==1)))) * EF(A...432
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EX((!(EG(!((((i7.i0.u32.p97==0)||(i1.u3.p11==1))&&(i14.i1.u70.p219==1))))) * E(TRUE U ((i7.i1....1005
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t175, t180, t196, t212, t240, t265, i0.t40, i0.t38, i0.t34, i0.u55.t54, i1.t173, i4.i0.u15.t1...640
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,13.2462,373048,1,0,685415,3854,3334,954324,408,37471,807393
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 192 transition count 338
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 192 transition count 338
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 192 transition count 274
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 187 transition count 269
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 187 transition count 269
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 186 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 186 transition count 268
Applied a total of 118 rules in 12 ms. Remains 186 /213 variables (removed 27) and now considering 268/359 (removed 91) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 268 rows 186 cols
[2025-05-30 23:59:29] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:59:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 267 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:59:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 14/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 268/454 variables, 186/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 2/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/454 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 454/454 variables, and 235 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved in 26217 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 267/267 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 36/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 268/454 variables, 186/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 267/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/502 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 454/454 variables, and 509 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 267/267 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 56312ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56313ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/213 places, 268/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56528 ms. Remains : 186/213 places, 268/359 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15522241534287118937.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14816666631121655344.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15522241534287118937.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14816666631121655344.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.784e+09,8.45169,222248,2,15722,5,819596,6,0,1014,1.06813e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG(!(A(A((p66==0) U (p194==1)) U EX((p168==1))))) * ((E(((p131==0)||(p63==1)) U ((p220==0)||(p182==1))) * ((p175==0)||(p220==1))) + (...269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!((E(!(EX((p168==1))) U (!(!((E(!((p194==1)) U (!((p66==0)) * !((p194==1)))) + EG(!(...691
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t36, t37, t38, t63, t64, t67, t68, t70, t84, t90, t91, t94, t95, t97...437
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7251265719514436737.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7251265719514436737.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7251265719514436737.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7251265719514436737.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7251265719514436737.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 242 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18041300320297309283.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14215234625456717938.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18041300320297309283.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14215234625456717938.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.784e+09,0.088324,6832,483,97,5570,696,467,7241,77,1903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG(!(A(A((i5.i1.u24.p66==0) U (i13.i1.u66.p194==1)) U EX((i12.i1.u60.p168==1))))) * ((E(((i9.i0.u44.p131==0)||(i4.i1.u22.p63==1)) U (...432
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!((E(!(EX((i12.i1.u60.p168==1))) U (!(!((E(!((i13.i1.u66.p194==1)) U (!((i5.i1.u24.p...1020
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t174, t176, t208, t236, t265, i1.t172, i2.i0.u15.t149, i2.i0.u15.t152, i2.i0.u16.t150, i2.i1....630
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,2.84122,118832,1,0,302983,1800,3316,213141,418,7764,390500
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 187 transition count 333
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 187 transition count 333
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 187 transition count 269
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 180 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 180 transition count 262
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 179 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 179 transition count 261
Applied a total of 132 rules in 6 ms. Remains 179 /213 variables (removed 34) and now considering 261/359 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 261 rows 179 cols
[2025-05-31 00:00:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:00:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 260 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:00:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 261/440 variables, 179/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 4/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/440 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 440/440 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 25886 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 36/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 3/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 261/440 variables, 179/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 260/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 3/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 1/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 4/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 440/440 variables, and 497 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 55992ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55994ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 179/213 places, 261/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56222 ms. Remains : 179/213 places, 261/359 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 261 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8863913063086050580.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:01:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality757016772795846231.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8863913063086050580.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality757016772795846231.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41253e+09,7.62318,206068,2,14637,5,777428,6,0,979,1.01051e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p130==0) * EX(AF(EX(((p76==0)||(p153==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p130==0)))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!(EX(((p76==0)||(p153==1)))))))))] =...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t82, t88, t89, t92, t93, t95...449
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16805870396223630498.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16805870396223630498.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16805870396223630498.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16805870396223630498.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16805870396223630498.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 237 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11190040557254946849.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12048719576683984437.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11190040557254946849.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12048719576683984437.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41253e+09,0.064089,6752,414,101,4285,782,434,9439,78,3964,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((i8.i0.u39.p130==0) * EX(AF(EX(((i4.i1.u19.p76==0)||(i10.i0.u48.p153==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((i8.i0.u39.p130==0)))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!(EX(((i4.i1.u19.p76==0)||...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t168, t173, t193, t209, t233, t258, i0.u54.t32, i0.u54.t35, i0.u54.t36, i0.u54.t37, i3.t159, ...611
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,1.65649,80480,1,0,188608,2378,2446,200837,403,14101,207997
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 186 transition count 332
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 186 transition count 332
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 186 transition count 268
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 180 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 180 transition count 262
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 179 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 179 transition count 261
Applied a total of 132 rules in 5 ms. Remains 179 /213 variables (removed 34) and now considering 261/359 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 261 rows 179 cols
[2025-05-31 00:02:27] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:02:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 260 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:02:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 11/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 6/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 261/440 variables, 179/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/440 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 440/440 variables, and 230 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 24909 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 38/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 261/440 variables, 179/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 260/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 2/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/440 variables, 4/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 440/440 variables, and 496 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 54988ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54989ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 179/213 places, 261/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55224 ms. Remains : 179/213 places, 261/359 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 261 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13948842158090297147.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1469196647507126685.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13948842158090297147.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1469196647507126685.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.39231e+09,7.53917,210380,2,14624,5,790459,6,0,979,1.02957e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX(AF((p151==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(EG(!((p151==0)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t81, t82, t88, t89, t92, t93...454
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17844590502350179030.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17844590502350179030.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17844590502350179030.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17844590502350179030.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17844590502350179030.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 237 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality821466633306614476.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3218937226858738203.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality821466633306614476.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3218937226858738203.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.39231e+09,0.093565,6852,553,102,5526,572,463,8127,76,1895,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX(AF((i9.i0.u37.p151==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(EG(!((i9.i0.u37.p151==0)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t168, t177, t189, t205, t233, t258, i0.t166, i2.u15.t143, i2.u15.t144, i2.u15.t146, i3.i1.t15...644
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,1.86977,83780,1,0,219904,1382,3364,156364,427,5932,289569
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 196 edges and 213 vertex of which 4 / 213 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 94 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 94 transitions
Performed 94 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 94
Iterating post reduction 0 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 210 transition count 262
Reduce places removed 94 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 1 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 116 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 101 transition count 233
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 99 transition count 233
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 99 transition count 229
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 95 transition count 229
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 259 place count 79 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 79 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 79 transition count 149
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 79 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 77 transition count 147
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 347 place count 73 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 73 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 357 place count 73 transition count 128
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 70 transition count 128
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 50 transition count 108
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 403 place count 47 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 47 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 47 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 46 transition count 92
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 46 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 44 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 43 transition count 89
Applied a total of 413 rules in 48 ms. Remains 43 /213 variables (removed 170) and now considering 89/359 (removed 270) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 43 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned [35, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/213 places, 89/359 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 41 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 88
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 39 transition count 87
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 39 /41 variables (removed 2) and now considering 87/89 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 39 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 39/213 places, 87/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 234 ms. Remains : 39/213 places, 87/359 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13336523377736633715.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8737865585285218488.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13336523377736633715.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8737865585285218488.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,101500,0.096762,7812,2,420,5,12797,6,0,242,16634,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((AF(!(E((p12==1) U (p209==1)))) * EG(((p114==0)||(p83==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((!(EG(!(!(E((p12==1) U (p209==1)))))) * EG(((p114==0)||(p83==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t54, t67, t85, Intersection with reachable ...224
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,3.99141,134104,1,0,955,609483,213,560,2638,792676,1021
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 186 transition count 332
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 186 transition count 332
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 186 transition count 268
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 179 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 179 transition count 261
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 178 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 178 transition count 260
Applied a total of 134 rules in 15 ms. Remains 178 /213 variables (removed 35) and now considering 260/359 (removed 99) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 260 rows 178 cols
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 194 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 259 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:03:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 11/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 3/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 7/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 260/438 variables, 178/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 4/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/438 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 438/438 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved in 25388 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 259/259 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 42/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 260/438 variables, 178/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 259/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 1/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 2/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 55464ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55465ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/213 places, 260/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55674 ms. Remains : 178/213 places, 260/359 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:04:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 260 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:04:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7578342009976770663.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:04:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3653861564735239129.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7578342009976770663.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3653861564735239129.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.39231e+09,7.55251,215740,2,14885,5,812872,6,0,974,1.05478e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12884245139093432581.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12884245139093432581.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12884245139093432581.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12884245139093432581.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12884245139093432581.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 242 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16963683859453562818.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15645718694759325247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16963683859453562818.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15645718694759325247.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.39231e+09,0.090274,6788,496,98,4929,531,440,7806,78,1627,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(AF((i4.i1.u28.p87==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),!((i4.i1.u28.p87==1)))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,0,2.9355,120324,1,0,313119,1214,1961,237928,337,5519,323868
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 359/359 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 196 edges and 213 vertex of which 4 / 213 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 91 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 91 transitions
Performed 91 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 91
Iterating post reduction 0 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 210 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 91 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 1 with 115 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 119 transition count 241
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 106 transition count 238
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 103 transition count 238
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 103 transition count 231
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 96 transition count 231
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 81 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 81 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 64 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 81 transition count 152
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 81 transition count 150
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 79 transition count 150
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 342 place count 75 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 75 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 75 transition count 133
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 73 transition count 133
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 53 transition count 113
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 397 place count 48 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 48 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 48 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 47 transition count 87
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 47 transition count 85
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 47 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 46 transition count 84
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 46 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 45 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 44 transition count 83
Applied a total of 412 rules in 36 ms. Remains 44 /213 variables (removed 169) and now considering 83/359 (removed 276) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 44 cols
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned [38, 43]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/213 places, 83/359 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 42 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 41 transition count 82
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 41 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 40 transition count 81
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 40 /42 variables (removed 2) and now considering 81/83 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 40 cols
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 40/213 places, 81/359 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 318 ms. Remains : 40/213 places, 81/359 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1118991489052967551.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12875212867174516606.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1118991489052967551.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12875212867174516606.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,64817,0.092507,7512,2,658,5,14037,6,0,239,16665,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(!(E(E((p100==1) U (p184==0)) U AF(((p182==0)||(p88==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(E(E((p100==1) U (p184==0)) U !(EG(!(((p182==0)||(p88==1)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t11, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t25, t28, t29, t31, t32, t33, t34, ...303
(forward)formula 0,0,0.816992,30356,1,0,455,135937,197,175,2459,124838,497
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-31 00:05:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 00:05:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Total runtime 1344751 ms.

BK_STOP 1748649928742

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-04b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-04b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729700657"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-04b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-04b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;