Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729700642.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-03b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729700642
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 109K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748648158247

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-03b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 23:35:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 23:35:59] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 23:35:59] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:59] [INFO ] Transformed 190 places.
[2025-05-30 23:35:59] [INFO ] Transformed 273 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:35:59] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 23:35:59] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 190 places and 273 transitions and 1051 arcs in 175 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 106 out of 190 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 273/273 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 180 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 180 transition count 263
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 179 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 179 transition count 262
Applied a total of 22 rules in 35 ms. Remains 179 /190 variables (removed 11) and now considering 262/273 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 262 rows 179 cols
[2025-05-30 23:35:59] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 29 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 231 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:36:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 422 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 261 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:36:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 261 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 191 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 8/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 261 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 261 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 261 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 262/441 variables, 179/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 3/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/441 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 441/441 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved in 26129 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 261/261 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/179 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 31/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 262/441 variables, 179/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 259/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 3/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 4/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 3/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 441/441 variables, and 488 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 259/261 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 56368ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 259 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 56382ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 179/190 places, 260/273 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 179 /179 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56873 ms. Remains : 179/190 places, 260/273 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 105 out of 178 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 23:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 260 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (45 resets) in 1567 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 26/107 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (13 resets) in 54 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 23/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 59 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (13 resets) in 45 ms. (86 steps per ms) remains 19/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (12 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 18/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (12 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 17/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (14 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 16/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (13 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 15/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (12 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 14/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (14 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (11 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 13/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (15 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (11 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 260 rows 178 cols
[2025-05-30 23:36:57] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 145/178 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp64 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp89 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 260/438 variables, 178/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/438 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 438/438 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved in 551 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 159/178 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 260/438 variables, 178/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 7/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/438 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 438/438 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved in 1320 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/13 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1891ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 7 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 2876 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 178 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 148 edges and 178 vertex of which 2 / 178 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 421 edges and 177 vertex of which 176 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 176 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 89 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 105 transition count 169
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 95 transition count 166
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 92 transition count 166
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 92 transition count 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 82 transition count 156
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 72 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 72 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 72 transition count 110
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 256 place count 70 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 70 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 70 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 69 transition count 104
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 52 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 52 transition count 86
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 298 place count 50 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 50 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 50 transition count 78
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 49 transition count 77
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -18
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 47 transition count 95
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 47 transition count 94
Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 47 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 316 place count 43 transition count 90
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 43 transition count 89
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 43 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 42 transition count 88
Applied a total of 319 rules in 62 ms. Remains 42 /178 variables (removed 136) and now considering 88/260 (removed 172) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 62 ms. Remains : 42/178 places, 88/260 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (125 resets) in 331 ms. (120 steps per ms) remains 2/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (519 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (188 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 42 cols
[2025-05-30 23:37:02] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/32 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/34 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/119 variables, 34/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 11/130 variables, 8/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 58 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/32 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/34 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/119 variables, 34/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 11/130 variables, 8/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 225 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 291ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 10 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 42 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 42/42 places, 88/88 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 15 edges and 42 vertex of which 2 / 42 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 194 edges and 41 vertex of which 38 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 38 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 37 transition count 82
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 37 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 36 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 35 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 35 transition count 77
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 34 transition count 76
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 34 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 33 transition count 72
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 33 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 32 transition count 71
Applied a total of 18 rules in 26 ms. Remains 32 /42 variables (removed 10) and now considering 71/88 (removed 17) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 26 ms. Remains : 32/42 places, 71/88 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 39705 steps (2455 resets) in 132 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 23:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 260 transitions.
Support contains 95 out of 178 places (down from 97) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 40 stabilizing places and 40 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 157 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 157 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 157 transition count 203
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 154 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 154 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 153 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 153 transition count 199
Applied a total of 86 rules in 19 ms. Remains 153 /178 variables (removed 25) and now considering 199/260 (removed 61) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 153 cols
[2025-05-30 23:37:03] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:37:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 198 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:37:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 352/352 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 16699 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 198/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 2/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 352/352 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 46751ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46753ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46942 ms. Remains : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:37:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:37:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13838091043213881978.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:37:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14994976723734611267.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13838091043213881978.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14994976723734611267.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.9176e+07,1.14921,42380,2,6282,5,151031,6,0,813,196128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AX((p138==1))) U (((p6==1)&&(p15==1))&&((p83==1)&&(p147==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((p138==1)))))) * (((p6==1)&&(p15==1))&&((p83==1)&&(p147==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t63, t64, t67, t68, t70, t83, t89, t90, t93, t94, t96...371
(forward)formula 0,1,19.898,596916,1,0,960,2.72513e+06,420,633,5501,3.93275e+06,1079
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 160 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 160 transition count 242
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 160 transition count 206
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 158 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 158 transition count 204
Applied a total of 76 rules in 16 ms. Remains 158 /178 variables (removed 20) and now considering 204/260 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 158 cols
[2025-05-30 23:38:10] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:38:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 203 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:38:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 7/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 204/362 variables, 158/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 2/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/362 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 362/362 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved in 19045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 203/203 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 29/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 4/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 204/362 variables, 158/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 203/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 2/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 1/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 3/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 1/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 362/362 variables, and 410 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 203/203 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 49107ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 203 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 49108ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 158/178 places, 204/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 49274 ms. Remains : 158/178 places, 204/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:38:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 204 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:38:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11632846154695528749.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:38:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16099383176236595676.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11632846154695528749.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16099383176236595676.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.80826e+07,1.48937,49636,2,6503,5,175670,6,0,838,233999,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p79==0) + (!(E(AF((p97==1)) U (EX((p49==1)) * (p169!=1)))) * ((((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p76==1)&&(p147==1)))||((((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p79==0))),!(EG(!((p97==1))))) * (p169!=1))) * (p49==1))] = FALSE * [((FwdU(Ini...310
(forward)formula 0,0,1.50093,49636,1,0,9,175670,11,4,883,233999,2
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 157 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 157 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 157 transition count 203
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 154 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 154 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 153 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 153 transition count 199
Applied a total of 86 rules in 15 ms. Remains 153 /178 variables (removed 25) and now considering 199/260 (removed 61) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 153 cols
[2025-05-30 23:39:01] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:39:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 198 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:39:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 352/352 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 16764 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 198/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 2/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 352/352 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 46814ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46815ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46996 ms. Remains : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15077602044452560689.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:39:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14456162869500420798.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15077602044452560689.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14456162869500420798.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.9176e+07,1.13102,42392,2,6282,5,151031,6,0,813,196128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF(AX((p46==0))) + (((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p49==1)&&(p147==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((p46==0))))))) + (((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p49==1)&&(p147==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t63, t64, t67, t68, t70, t83, t89, t90, t93, t94, t96...371
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5333372698861523674.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5333372698861523674.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5333372698861523674.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5333372698861523674.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5333372698861523674.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 122 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4314137948925777211.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2177428925551578712.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4314137948925777211.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2177428925551578712.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.9176e+07,0.044375,5468,342,73,2593,592,403,3351,66,1135,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF(AX((i4.i0.u9.p46==0))) + (((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p14==1))&&((i5.u16.p49==1)&&(i0.u2.p147==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((i4.i0.u9.p46==0))))))) + (((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p14==1))&&((i5.u16.p49==1)&&(i0.u2.p...176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t147, t168, t180, t196, u44.t32, u44.t35, u44.t36, u44.t37, i0.t143, i0.t141, i4.i1.t134, i4....546
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,1.29325,64348,1,0,149289,1458,2118,160193,348,6553,225364
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 144 edges and 178 vertex of which 4 / 178 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 66 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 66 transitions
Performed 66 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 66
Iterating post reduction 0 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 175 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 109 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 99 transition count 170
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 96 transition count 170
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 96 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 86 transition count 160
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 77 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 77 transition count 151
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 77 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 76 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 76 transition count 114
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 61 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 275 place count 59 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 59 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 59 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 58 transition count 90
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 58 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 57 transition count 89
Applied a total of 285 rules in 24 ms. Remains 57 /178 variables (removed 121) and now considering 89/260 (removed 171) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 57 cols
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned [50, 56]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/178 places, 89/260 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 55 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 54 transition count 88
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 54 /55 variables (removed 1) and now considering 88/89 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 54 cols
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 54/178 places, 88/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 233 ms. Remains : 54/178 places, 88/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12597138939932022240.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5267103538845872360.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12597138939932022240.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5267103538845872360.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,106619,0.140159,9820,2,1214,5,23045,6,0,301,23453,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p89==1) * (((p23==1) + A(((p126==1)||(((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p107==1)&&(p147==1)))) U (p25==1))) + (A(AF((((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p4...345
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p89==1) * (((p23==1) + !((E(!((p25==1)) U (!(((p126==1)||(((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p...1134
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t8, t13, t15, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t29, t40, t43, t45, t49, t50, t51, t52, t5...371
(forward)formula 0,0,5.26171,165176,1,0,1034,954231,226,462,2699,935230,1171
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 157 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 157 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 157 transition count 203
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 154 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 154 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 153 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 153 transition count 199
Applied a total of 86 rules in 14 ms. Remains 153 /178 variables (removed 25) and now considering 199/260 (removed 61) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 153 cols
[2025-05-30 23:40:25] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:40:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 198 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:40:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 352/352 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 16845 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 198/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 2/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 352/352 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 46908ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46909ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47072 ms. Remains : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11513207226016253362.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11185389414951626212.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11513207226016253362.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11185389414951626212.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.9176e+07,1.13122,42452,2,6282,5,151031,6,0,813,196128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((((EG(!((((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p33==1)&&(p147==1))))) + EG((((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((p111==1)&&(p147==1))))) + (!(AF((p162==1))) + EF(((...592
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E((((EG(!((((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p33==1)&&(p147==1))))) + EG((((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((p111==1)&&(p147...741
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 192/0/7
(forward)formula 0,0,21.0175,548840,1,0,178,2.58713e+06,20,3,4441,3.08232e+06,176
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 160 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 160 transition count 242
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 160 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 159 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 159 transition count 205
Applied a total of 74 rules in 4 ms. Remains 159 /178 variables (removed 19) and now considering 205/260 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 205 rows 159 cols
[2025-05-30 23:41:33] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:41:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 204 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:41:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 179 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 8/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 8/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 205/364 variables, 159/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 3/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/364 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 364/364 variables, and 213 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved in 21616 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 43/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 205/364 variables, 159/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 204/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 1/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 3/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 1/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 4/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 364/364 variables, and 423 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 51672ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51685ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 159/178 places, 205/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51876 ms. Remains : 159/178 places, 205/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 205 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8645692488567681942.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9075408328511102572.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8645692488567681942.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9075408328511102572.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.94525e+07,1.14697,44548,2,6735,5,162524,6,0,843,196971,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(((p184!=1)||((p124==1)&&(p163==1))) U ((((E((((p50==1)&&(p87==1))&&((p118==1)&&(p148==1))) U (((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((p111==1)&&(p147...498
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((p184!=1)||((p124==1)&&(p163==1))) U ((((E((((p50==1)&&(p87==1))&&((p118==1)&&(p148==1...698
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, t18, t26, t35, t39, t40, t66, t67, t70, t71, t73, t86, t92, t93, t96, t97, t99, t11...378
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6826621152223000540.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6826621152223000540.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6826621152223000540.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6826621152223000540.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6826621152223000540.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 121 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10948273705247650358.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9379912285301077793.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10948273705247650358.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9379912285301077793.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.94525e+07,0.036515,5368,397,88,2163,365,420,3042,73,1033,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(((i14.i0.u58.p184!=1)||((i9.i0.u37.p124==1)&&(i12.u49.p163==1))) U ((((E((((i2.i0.u14.p50==1)&&(i4.i1.u26.p87==1))&&((i7.i1.u36.p11...817
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(((i14.i0.u58.p184!=1)||((i9.i0.u37.p124==1)&&(i12.u49.p163==1))) U ((((E((((i2.i0.u14.p...1033
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t148, t150, t171, t183, t202, i2.i0.u14.t121, i2.i0.u14.t122, i2.i0.u14.t124, i2.i1.t138, i2....565
(forward)formula 0,0,1.31263,68088,1,0,136852,1623,2766,209363,392,9270,184758
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 158 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 158 transition count 240
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 158 transition count 204
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 156 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 156 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 155 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 155 transition count 201
Applied a total of 82 rules in 19 ms. Remains 155 /178 variables (removed 23) and now considering 201/260 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 155 cols
[2025-05-30 23:42:57] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:42:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:42:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/155 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 8/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 201/356 variables, 155/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 3/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/356 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 356/356 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 16902 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 155/155 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/155 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 29/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 201/356 variables, 155/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 200/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 1/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 3/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 1/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 4/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 356/356 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 155/155 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 46941ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46941ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 155/178 places, 201/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47099 ms. Remains : 155/178 places, 201/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4502138747612170018.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:43:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14102302748200949855.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4502138747612170018.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14102302748200949855.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.23293e+07,1.43928,51440,2,6463,5,190710,6,0,823,245390,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(!(((A((p108==1) U (p39==1)) * AF((p180==1))) * (p161==1)))) U (AG(((!(A((((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((p95==1)&&(p147==1))) U (((p6==1)&&(p1...392
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!((p39==1)) U (!((p108==1)) * !((p39==1)))) + EG(!((p39==1))))) * !(EG(!((p1...1087
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t33, t38, t39, t65, t66, t69, t70, t72, t85, t91, t92, t95, t96, t98, t11...366
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17377769689945370478.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17377769689945370478.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17377769689945370478.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17377769689945370478.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17377769689945370478.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 118 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15413039100196033010.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15518647763143079146.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15413039100196033010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15518647763143079146.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.23293e+07,0.056967,6064,462,74,3845,454,421,6315,70,1678,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(!(((A((i7.u28.p108==1) U (i2.i0.u12.p39==1)) * AF((i11.i0.u55.p180==1))) * (i12.u48.p161==1)))) U (AG(((!(A((((i1.u2.p6==1)&&(i1.u2....596
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!((i2.i0.u12.p39==1)) U (!((i7.u28.p108==1)) * !((i2.i0.u12.p39==1)))) + EG(...1574
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t145, t170, t182, t198, i1.t150, i1.t143, i1.u34.t69, i1.u34.t70, i1.u34.t72, i3.i0.u15.t120,...544
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,0,5.6515,187056,1,0,351325,1881,3146,636874,394,11212,381077
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 159 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 159 transition count 241
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 159 transition count 205
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 157 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 157 transition count 203
Applied a total of 78 rules in 6 ms. Remains 157 /178 variables (removed 21) and now considering 203/260 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 203 rows 157 cols
[2025-05-30 23:44:20] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:44:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 202 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:44:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 6/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 203/360 variables, 157/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 3/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 3/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/360 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 360/360 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved in 17451 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 157/157 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 202/202 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 31/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 203/360 variables, 157/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 202/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 1/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 3/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 5/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 360/360 variables, and 410 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 157/157 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 202/202 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 47489ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 202 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47490ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 157/178 places, 203/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47670 ms. Remains : 157/178 places, 203/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 203 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8285225195990278203.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9184740115511893544.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8285225195990278203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9184740115511893544.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.64281e+07,1.55082,51324,2,6617,5,190941,6,0,833,243021,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((EX(AF((p167==0))) * (p39==1))) + AF((AG((((p6==0)||(p14==0))||((p114==0)||(p147==0)))) + (EF(((p141==0)||(p104==0))) * (p173==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EX((EX(!(EG(!((p167==0))))) * (p39==1))))),!((!(E(TRUE U !((((p6==0)||(p14==0))||((p114==0)||(p1...227
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t25, t34, t39, t40, t66, t67, t70, t71, t73, t87, t93, t94, t97, t98, t100, t1...367
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7493131047311572560.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7493131047311572560.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7493131047311572560.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7493131047311572560.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7493131047311572560.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 119 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1644848037052236264.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6937832799273298667.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1644848037052236264.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6937832799273298667.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.64281e+07,0.037017,5232,363,79,2071,327,407,2512,71,762,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((EX(AF((i11.i1.u60.p167==0))) * (i1.i0.u13.p39==1))) + AF((AG((((i10.u2.p6==0)||(i10.u2.p14==0))||((i7.u35.p114==0)||(i10.u2.p147==0)...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EX((EX(!(EG(!((i11.i1.u60.p167==0))))) * (i1.i0.u13.p39==1))))),!((!(E(TRUE U !((((i10.u2.p6==0)...307
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t147, t149, t167, t179, t200, i2.t138, i2.u10.t118, i2.u15.t122, i2.u15.t123, i2.u15.t125, i2...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,0,1.41139,66800,1,0,146753,1291,2482,179698,372,5224,201013
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 157 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 157 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 157 transition count 203
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 154 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 154 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 153 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 153 transition count 199
Applied a total of 86 rules in 11 ms. Remains 153 /178 variables (removed 25) and now considering 199/260 (removed 61) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 153 cols
[2025-05-30 23:45:39] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:45:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 198 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:45:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 352/352 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 16946 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 198/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 2/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 352/352 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 46991ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46991ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47181 ms. Remains : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18305597470205270131.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17781937055533567351.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18305597470205270131.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17781937055533567351.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.9176e+07,1.14799,42416,2,6282,5,151031,6,0,813,196128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(AG((p46==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p46==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t63, t64, t67, t68, t70, t83, t89, t90, t93, t94, t96...371
(forward)formula 0,0,4.73724,132124,1,0,337,617341,420,184,5614,435344,408
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 151 edges and 178 vertex of which 4 / 178 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 73 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 73 transitions
Performed 73 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 73
Iterating post reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 175 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 102 transition count 170
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 95 transition count 168
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 93 transition count 168
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 93 transition count 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 82 transition count 157
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 70 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 70 transition count 145
Ensure Unique test removed 37 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 37 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 70 transition count 108
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 70 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 69 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 261 place count 65 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 65 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 65 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 64 transition count 97
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 50 transition count 83
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 299 place count 47 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 47 transition count 72
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 47 transition count 69
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 307 place count 47 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 45 transition count 67
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 45 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 43 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 42 transition count 65
Applied a total of 313 rules in 26 ms. Remains 42 /178 variables (removed 136) and now considering 65/260 (removed 195) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 42 cols
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned [35, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/178 places, 65/260 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 40 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 39 transition count 64
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 39 transition count 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 38 transition count 63
Applied a total of 4 rules in 13 ms. Remains 38 /40 variables (removed 2) and now considering 63/65 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 38 cols
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 38/178 places, 63/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 210 ms. Remains : 38/178 places, 63/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11166985062106488329.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5135404495472081408.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11166985062106488329.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5135404495472081408.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,29750,0.1251,8956,2,832,5,23992,6,0,214,24398,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((p173==1) * (EG(((p37==1)||(p67==1))) + (((p56==1)&&(p81==1))&&((p118==1)&&(p148==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((p173==1) * (EG(((p37==1)||(p67==1))) + (((p56==1)&&(p81==1))&&((p118==1)&&(p148==1))))))...165
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t6, t8, t10, t11, t18, t20, t35, t36, t37, t40, t41, t42, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51...300
(forward)formula 0,0,0.374952,16972,1,0,205,73186,153,89,1774,61841,206
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 163 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 163 transition count 245
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 160 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 160 transition count 242
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 159 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 159 transition count 241
Applied a total of 38 rules in 6 ms. Remains 159 /178 variables (removed 19) and now considering 241/260 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 159 cols
[2025-05-30 23:46:31] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 355 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:46:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 469 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:46:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 6/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/400 variables, 159/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 3/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/400 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/400 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 400/400 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 27049 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 30/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 8/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 241/400 variables, 159/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 240/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 3/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 1/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 2/452 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 400/400 variables, and 452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 57138ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57139ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 159/178 places, 241/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57614 ms. Remains : 159/178 places, 241/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:47:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:47:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15766795272217735329.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13844811299888913303.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15766795272217735329.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13844811299888913303.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.95699e+07,1.42916,49044,2,6718,5,167408,6,0,879,213252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A(EF(EG((p184==1))) U E(EX((p46==1)) U E((p160==1) U (((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p80==1)&&(p147==1)))))) U (((p86==1) + (E(!((((p6==1)&&(p9...442
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(E(EX((p46==1)) U E((p160==1) U (((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p80==1)&&(p147==1)))))) U (!(E(TRUE ...1866
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, t18, t25, t34, t38, t39, t40, t67, t68, t71, t72, t74, t86, t87, t93, t94, t97, t98...437
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10558698404960166866.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10558698404960166866.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10558698404960166866.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10558698404960166866.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10558698404960166866.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 209 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability827499088079289396.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:47:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15512677815594265179.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability827499088079289396.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15512677815594265179.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.95699e+07,0.068016,6332,459,88,4426,572,403,7134,75,1958,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A(EF(EG((i13.u59.p184==1))) U E(EX((i3.u14.p46==1)) U E((i12.i1.u53.p160==1) U (((i7.u48.p6==1)&&(i7.u48.p14==1))&&((i5.u25.p80==1)&&(i...689
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(E(EX((i3.u14.p46==1)) U E((i12.i1.u53.p160==1) U (((i7.u48.p6==1)&&(i7.u48.p14==1))&&((i5.u...2766
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t146, t148, t152, t218, t238, i3.t139, i3.u8.t118, i3.u17.t119, i4.i1.t113, i4.i1.u18.t93, i4...541
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,13.0245,350904,1,0,580720,6760,2970,1.26369e+06,455,100536,636459
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 158 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 158 transition count 240
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 158 transition count 204
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 155 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 155 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 154 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 154 transition count 200
Applied a total of 84 rules in 16 ms. Remains 154 /178 variables (removed 24) and now considering 200/260 (removed 60) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 154 cols
[2025-05-30 23:48:12] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:48:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 199 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:48:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 200/354 variables, 154/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 3/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 3/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/354 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 354/354 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved in 17112 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 199/199 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 27/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 200/354 variables, 154/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 199/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 3/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 3/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 354/354 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 199/199 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 47165ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47165ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 154/178 places, 200/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47403 ms. Remains : 154/178 places, 200/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:49:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:49:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7401534668724928626.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16849795513290250796.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7401534668724928626.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16849795513290250796.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.04924e+07,1.34847,45500,2,6551,5,162376,6,0,818,210650,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((p111==1)&&(p147==1))) U AF(EX((EF((p117==1)) * (p106==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(EX((E(TRUE U (p117==1)) * (p106==1)))))))) * !((((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((p111==1)&&(p147...291
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t63, t64, t67, t68, t70, t73, t84, t90, t91, t94, t95...376
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16245613053334842541.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16245613053334842541.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16245613053334842541.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16245613053334842541.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16245613053334842541.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 116 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11672032822527297517.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12221313501437184665.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11672032822527297517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12221313501437184665.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.04924e+07,0.047555,5676,413,80,3017,590,417,4252,73,1316,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p9==1))&&((i8.i0.u34.p111==1)&&(i0.u2.p147==1))) U AF(EX((EF((i8.i1.u36.p117==1)) * (i8.i1.u36.p106==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(EX((E(TRUE U (i8.i1.u36.p117==1)) * (i8.i1.u36.p106==1)))))))) * !((((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(...379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t151, t166, t181, t197, i0.t144, i0.t142, i1.i0.u37.t32, i1.i0.u37.t35, i1.i0.u37.t36, i1.i0....570
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,1,5.51975,202796,1,0,432933,2480,2680,522843,396,14942,491514
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 148 edges and 178 vertex of which 4 / 178 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 73 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 73 transitions
Performed 73 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 73
Iterating post reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 175 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 102 transition count 170
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 95 transition count 169
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 94 transition count 169
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 94 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 83 transition count 158
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 72 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 72 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 37 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 37 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 72 transition count 110
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 254 place count 69 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 69 transition count 105
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 55 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 288 place count 52 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 52 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 52 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 51 transition count 78
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 51 transition count 76
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 51 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 50 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 48 transition count 73
Applied a total of 300 rules in 25 ms. Remains 48 /178 variables (removed 130) and now considering 73/260 (removed 187) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 48 cols
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned [42, 47]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/178 places, 73/260 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 46 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 72
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 44 transition count 71
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /46 variables (removed 2) and now considering 71/73 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 44 cols
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/178 places, 71/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 228 ms. Remains : 44/178 places, 71/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7942294578607919420.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8317851401264751850.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7942294578607919420.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8317851401264751850.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,68508,0.114101,8752,2,1033,5,20365,6,0,246,24461,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p35==1) * AF((p99==0))) * (EG((p31==1)) + A(AF((((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p114==1)&&(p147==1)))) U (((p56==1)&&(p87==1))&&((p118==1)&&...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p35==1) * !(EG(!((p99==0)))))),(p31==1))] != FALSE + [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p35==1)...423
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t5, t7, t12, t14, t16, t17, t19, t26, t41, t42, t43, t53, t54, t55, t59, t60,...294
(forward)formula 0,0,4.44778,132660,1,0,1054,850623,184,469,2200,741545,1203
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 157 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 157 transition count 239
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 157 transition count 203
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 154 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 154 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 153 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 153 transition count 199
Applied a total of 86 rules in 11 ms. Remains 153 /178 variables (removed 25) and now considering 199/260 (removed 61) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 153 cols
[2025-05-30 23:49:40] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:49:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 198 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:49:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/352 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 352/352 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 16814 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 199/352 variables, 153/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 198/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 2/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 4/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 352/352 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 46851ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46852ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47016 ms. Remains : 153/178 places, 199/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:50:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:50:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4946386140797599298.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16854855910949810119.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4946386140797599298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16854855910949810119.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.9176e+07,1.114,42284,2,6282,5,151031,6,0,813,196128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(A(AX((((p56==1)&&(p87==1))&&((p118==1)&&(p148==1)))) U !(EF((((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p107==1)&&(p147==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),!(!(E(TRUE U (((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p107==1)&&(p147==1))))))) * !(!(EX(!((((p...367
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t63, t64, t67, t68, t70, t83, t89, t90, t93, t94, t96...371
(forward)formula 0,0,23.0874,597640,1,0,584,3.30821e+06,425,227,5673,3.06675e+06,676
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 159 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 159 transition count 241
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 159 transition count 205
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 156 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 156 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 155 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 155 transition count 201
Applied a total of 82 rules in 7 ms. Remains 155 /178 variables (removed 23) and now considering 201/260 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 155 cols
[2025-05-30 23:50:51] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 184 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:50:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 352 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:50:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/155 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 9/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 201/356 variables, 155/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 3/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/356 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 356/356 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 20852 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 155/155 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/155 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 34/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 201/356 variables, 155/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 200/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 1/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 1/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 3/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 356/356 variables, and 406 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 155/155 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 50897ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50898ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 155/178 places, 201/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51258 ms. Remains : 155/178 places, 201/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18257787814668254540.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12837010996531483282.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18257787814668254540.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12837010996531483282.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.32151e+07,1.57836,57124,2,6748,5,206282,6,0,823,276760,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((!(EF(AG((p35==1)))) * A(!(E((p158==1) U (p132==1))) U !(EF(((((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p80==1)&&(p147==1)))||(p109==1)))))) U EF(!(EX(((...396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((((p115==1)&&(p6==1))&&((p14==1)&&(p49==1)))&&(p147==1))))))) * !((!(E(TRUE U !(...1006
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t25, t29, t33, t36, t37, t38, t64, t65, t68, t69, t71, t84, t90, t91, t94, t95...382
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,14.2562,405872,1,0,654,1.99478e+06,447,283,6113,2.00907e+06,759
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 178/178 places, 260/260 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 158 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 158 transition count 240
Ensure Unique test removed 36 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 36 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 158 transition count 204
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 156 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 156 transition count 202
Applied a total of 80 rules in 12 ms. Remains 156 /178 variables (removed 22) and now considering 202/260 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 156 cols
[2025-05-30 23:51:56] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:51:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 247 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 201 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:51:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/156 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 8/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 8/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 202/358 variables, 156/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 12 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 3/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/358 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 358/358 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved in 17423 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 156/156 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 201/201 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/156 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 36/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 202/358 variables, 156/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 201/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 3/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 49 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 3/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 1/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 358/358 variables, and 408 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 156/156 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 201/201 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 47465ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47466ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 156/178 places, 202/260 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47725 ms. Remains : 156/178 places, 202/260 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2855556743007968317.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:52:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5489436921559090283.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2855556743007968317.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5489436921559090283.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.4869e+07,1.05269,41924,2,6334,5,150845,6,0,828,193351,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF((((AG((((p6==0)||(p15==0))||((p49==0)||(p147==0)))) + ((p138==0)&&(p167==0))) + ((p60==0)||(p6==0))) + (((p14==0)||(p114==0))||(p1...500
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((Init * EG(!(EG(!((((!(E(TRUE U !((((p6==0)||(p15==0))||((p49==0)||(p147==0)))))) + ((p138==0)&&(p167==...1118
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t25, t33, t36, t37, t38, t64, t65, t68, t69, t71, t84, t90, t91, t94, t95, t97...371
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10930596909466315622.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10930596909466315622.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10930596909466315622.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10930596909466315622.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10930596909466315622.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 121 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14704262369605372051.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12741027262732497386.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14704262369605372051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12741027262732497386.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.4869e+07,0.0426,5520,383,77,2682,495,403,3640,72,1271,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF((((AG((((i10.u1.p6==0)||(i10.u1.p15==0))||((i2.u15.p49==0)||(i10.u1.p147==0)))) + ((i9.i1.u43.p138==0)&&(i14.u51.p167==0))) + ((i5...777
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((Init * EG(!(EG(!((((!(E(TRUE U !((((i10.u1.p6==0)||(i10.u1.p15==0))||((i2.u15.p49==0)||(i10.u1.p147==0...1664
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t149, t170, t179, t199, i2.u14.t120, i2.u14.t123, i2.u15.t121, i3.i1.t136, i3.i1.u8.t116, i3....557
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.60123,185104,1,0,380674,1986,2979,514128,412,11377,421190
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 23:53:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:53:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 1039747 ms.

BK_STOP 1748649199269

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-03b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-03b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729700642"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-03b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-03b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;