Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729700626.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-02b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729700626
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 480K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 108K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748647513714

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-02b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 23:25:14] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 23:25:14] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 65 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Transformed 155 places.
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Transformed 194 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 155 places and 194 transitions and 620 arcs in 154 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 91 out of 155 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 155/155 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 149 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 149 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 149 transition count 172
Applied a total of 28 rules in 27 ms. Remains 149 /155 variables (removed 6) and now considering 172/194 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 172 rows 149 cols
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 369 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 171 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:25:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 20/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 172/321 variables, 149/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/321 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 321/321 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved in 13547 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 171/171 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/149 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 27/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 172/321 variables, 149/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 169/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 2/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 4/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 321/321 variables, and 362 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/171 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 43635ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 169 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 43645ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/155 places, 170/194 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 148 transition count 170
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 148 /149 variables (removed 1) and now considering 170/170 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 148 cols
[2025-05-30 23:25:59] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:25:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 148/155 places, 170/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 44205 ms. Remains : 148/155 places, 170/194 transitions.
Support contains 91 out of 148 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 23:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 170 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 148 places (down from 91) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 83 to 82
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (23 resets) in 1122 ms. (35 steps per ms) remains 13/82 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (22 resets) in 312 ms. (127 steps per ms) remains 12/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (31 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 10/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (35 resets) in 220 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (39 resets) in 69 ms. (571 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (58 resets) in 155 ms. (256 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (29 resets) in 113 ms. (350 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (21 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (37 resets) in 168 ms. (236 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (42 resets) in 259 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (59 resets) in 212 ms. (187 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (34 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-05-30 23:26:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp66 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp72 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 120/148 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 170/318 variables, 148/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 318/318 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved in 176 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 148/148 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 127/137 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 11/148 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 170/318 variables, 148/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/318 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 318/318 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved in 159 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 148/148 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 341ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 31 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 148 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 134 edges and 148 vertex of which 4 / 148 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 284 edges and 146 vertex of which 140 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 140 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 76 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 68 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 66 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 65 transition count 76
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 65 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 58 transition count 69
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 48 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 48 transition count 59
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 48 transition count 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 47 transition count 58
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 45 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 45 transition count 54
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 45 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 44 transition count 52
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 29 transition count 37
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 27 transition count 31
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 27 transition count 31
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -9
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 25 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 24 transition count 39
Applied a total of 245 rules in 61 ms. Remains 24 /148 variables (removed 124) and now considering 39/170 (removed 131) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61 ms. Remains : 24/148 places, 39/170 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3628 resets) in 225 ms. (176 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 37573 steps (939 resets) in 47 ms. (782 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 23:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 170 transitions.
Support contains 74 out of 148 places (down from 75) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 36 stabilizing places and 36 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 128 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 128 transition count 150
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 124 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 124 transition count 146
Applied a total of 48 rules in 13 ms. Remains 124 /148 variables (removed 24) and now considering 146/170 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 124 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:01] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 145 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 15/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 6/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 270/270 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 9565 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 22/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 145/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 3/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 270/270 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 39593ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39593ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/148 places, 146/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39737 ms. Remains : 124/148 places, 146/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9660963988644148576.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2089374320481791368.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9660963988644148576.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2089374320481791368.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.72657e+06,0.143375,10100,2,2580,5,24320,6,0,644,28437,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AX((p97!=1)) U EX(E(((p89==1)&&(p128==1)) U (p96==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(E(((p89==1)&&(p128==1)) U (p96==1))))) * !(!(EX(!((p97!=1)))))) * !(EX(E(((p89==1)...269
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t61, t62, t65, t66, t68, t81, t86, t87, t90, t91, t93...305
(forward)formula 0,0,3.36939,125844,1,0,371,559769,318,142,3956,675418,432
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 136 edges and 148 vertex of which 4 / 148 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 69 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 69 transitions
Performed 69 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 69
Iterating post reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 145 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 76 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 68 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 66 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 65 transition count 80
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 65 transition count 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 60 transition count 75
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 50 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 50 transition count 65
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 50 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 49 transition count 64
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 46 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 46 transition count 59
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 46 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 44 transition count 55
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 32 transition count 43
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 30 transition count 37
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 30 transition count 37
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 30 transition count 36
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 30 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 28 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 27 transition count 34
Applied a total of 245 rules in 29 ms. Remains 27 /148 variables (removed 121) and now considering 34/170 (removed 136) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 27 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned [19, 26]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/148 places, 34/170 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 25 transition count 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 24 transition count 33
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 24 /25 variables (removed 1) and now considering 33/34 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 24 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 59 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 24/148 places, 33/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 24/148 places, 33/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17026083441894258294.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14029709980888883097.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17026083441894258294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14029709980888883097.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1223,0.007196,3968,2,114,5,869,6,0,128,933,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((p122==1)) * EF((p111==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((p122==1)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U (p111==1))))] = FALSE)
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t6, t8, t10, t12, t19, t28, t30, t31, Intersection with reachable at each step enabl...206
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 31/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.03266,5248,1,0,96,6945,97,47,972,7815,99
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 138 edges and 148 vertex of which 4 / 148 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 145 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 74 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 66 transition count 81
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 66 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 59 transition count 74
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 191 place count 48 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 48 transition count 63
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 48 transition count 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 46 transition count 61
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 43 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 43 transition count 56
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 43 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 42 transition count 53
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 31 transition count 42
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 29 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 29 transition count 36
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 29 transition count 35
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 29 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 27 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 26 transition count 33
Applied a total of 247 rules in 25 ms. Remains 26 /148 variables (removed 122) and now considering 33/170 (removed 137) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 26 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned [20, 25]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/148 places, 33/170 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 24 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 32
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 31
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 31/33 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 22 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/148 places, 31/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 22/148 places, 31/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 31 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 69 steps (6 resets) in 5 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16316757224539678703.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5397057474359135505.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16316757224539678703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5397057474359135505.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getBufIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:343)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:420)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 129 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 129 transition count 151
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 125 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 125 transition count 147
Applied a total of 46 rules in 5 ms. Remains 125 /148 variables (removed 23) and now considering 147/170 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 125 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:45] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 20/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 7/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 147/272 variables, 125/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/272 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 272/272 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 10127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 147/272 variables, 125/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 146/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 2/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 3/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 272/272 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 40153ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40154ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/148 places, 147/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40287 ms. Remains : 125/148 places, 147/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 147 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2527319580611910547.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5269180780144011350.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2527319580611910547.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5269180780144011350.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.78403e+06,0.139392,10544,2,2557,5,25322,6,0,649,30637,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(EX(AF((p125==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(EX(!(EG(!((p125==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t33, t36, t37, t38, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t82, t87, t88, t91, t92, t94...305
(forward)formula 0,0,12.3436,435016,1,0,1119,2.9299e+06,317,480,3983,2.59931e+06,1271
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 129 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 129 transition count 151
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 126 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 148
Applied a total of 44 rules in 5 ms. Remains 126 /148 variables (removed 22) and now considering 148/170 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 126 cols
[2025-05-30 23:27:37] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:27:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 147 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:27:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 19/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 7/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 148/274 variables, 126/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 274/274 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 10203 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 27/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 148/274 variables, 126/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 147/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 4/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 274/274 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 20489 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 30708ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30708ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/148 places, 148/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30835 ms. Remains : 126/148 places, 148/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13793279251518387854.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13235237104272310056.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13793279251518387854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13235237104272310056.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.84148e+06,0.139893,10548,2,2549,5,25394,6,0,654,30763,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(AX((p131==1))) * ((p137==0) + (EF((p17==0)) * (p129==0)))) * ((AF((p92==0)) + (p30==1)) + (p64==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((p131==1))))))) * ((p137==0) + (E(TRUE U (p17==0)) * (p129==0)))) * ((!(EG(!(...202
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t25, t33, t36, t37, t38, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t82, t87, t88, t91, t92, t94...305
(forward)formula 0,0,5.72715,208696,1,0,976,1.0065e+06,335,551,4186,1.26249e+06,987
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 131 edges and 148 vertex of which 4 / 148 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 145 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 81 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 73 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 70 transition count 85
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 70 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 62 transition count 77
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 51 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 51 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 51 transition count 65
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 51 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 50 transition count 64
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 47 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 47 transition count 59
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 47 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 45 transition count 55
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 34 transition count 44
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 33 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 33 transition count 41
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 33 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 31 transition count 38
Applied a total of 238 rules in 21 ms. Remains 31 /148 variables (removed 117) and now considering 38/170 (removed 132) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 31 cols
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned [25, 30]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/148 places, 38/170 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 29 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 28 transition count 37
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 28 transition count 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 27 transition count 36
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 27 /29 variables (removed 2) and now considering 36/38 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 36 rows 27 cols
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 27/148 places, 36/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 150 ms. Remains : 27/148 places, 36/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 36 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12406514885823802208.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10600750114231442118.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12406514885823802208.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10600750114231442118.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2404,0.013516,4272,2,248,5,1893,6,0,142,2233,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p108==0) + AF(((p22==1)||(((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p76==1)&&(p112==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p108==0) + !(EG(!(((p22==1)||(((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p76==1)&&(p112==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t17, t27, t28, t34, Intersection with reachable at each ste...213
(forward)formula 0,1,0.217155,14128,1,0,343,56431,99,169,1094,67914,354
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 128 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 128 transition count 150
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 124 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 124 transition count 146
Applied a total of 48 rules in 6 ms. Remains 124 /148 variables (removed 24) and now considering 146/170 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 124 cols
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 145 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 15/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 6/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 270/270 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 9290 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 22/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 145/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 3/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 270/270 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 39323ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39323ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/148 places, 146/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39458 ms. Remains : 124/148 places, 146/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10666812174848166012.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17261766092905887802.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10666812174848166012.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17261766092905887802.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.72657e+06,0.135827,10152,2,2580,5,24320,6,0,644,28437,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(!((!(((((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((p41==1)&&(p112==1)))||(((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((p79==1)&&(p112==1))))) * EX((p143==1))))) U (p51==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((p51==1))))) * !(E(!((p51==1)) U (!(EX(!((!(((((p6==1)&&(p9==1))&&((p41==1)&&(p112==1)))||(((p6...243
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t61, t62, t65, t66, t68, t81, t86, t87, t90, t91, t93...305
(forward)formula 0,1,13.0109,449940,1,0,1360,3.01308e+06,318,607,3986,2.80886e+06,1500
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 136 edges and 148 vertex of which 4 / 148 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 69 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 69 transitions
Performed 69 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 69
Iterating post reduction 0 with 69 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 145 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 76 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 67 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 65 transition count 79
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 65 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 60 transition count 74
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 190 place count 49 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 49 transition count 63
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 49 transition count 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 47 transition count 61
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 44 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 44 transition count 56
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 44 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 42 transition count 52
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 31 transition count 41
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 30 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 30 transition count 38
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 30 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 28 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 27 transition count 35
Applied a total of 245 rules in 25 ms. Remains 27 /148 variables (removed 121) and now considering 35/170 (removed 135) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 27 cols
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned [20, 26]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/148 places, 35/170 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 25 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 24 transition count 34
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 24 /25 variables (removed 1) and now considering 34/35 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 24 cols
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 24/148 places, 34/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 24/148 places, 34/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7735152809490477924.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8309215375000040270.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7735152809490477924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8309215375000040270.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1185,0.009129,4116,2,107,5,1010,6,0,129,1195,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((p48!=1) U (p127==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p48!=1)) * (p127==1))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 30/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.012431,4372,1,0,9,1081,15,1,256,1195,4
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 131 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 131 transition count 153
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 128 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 128 transition count 150
Applied a total of 40 rules in 10 ms. Remains 128 /148 variables (removed 20) and now considering 150/170 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 150 rows 128 cols
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 149 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 20/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 5/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 150/278 variables, 128/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/278 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 278/278 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved in 9159 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 150/278 variables, 128/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 149/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 3/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/278 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 278/278 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 39185ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39186ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/148 places, 150/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39323 ms. Remains : 128/148 places, 150/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 150 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3806231806957991866.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12834843802774422915.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3806231806957991866.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12834843802774422915.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.79584e+06,0.112793,9284,2,2527,5,20419,6,0,664,22542,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX((E((p127==1) U (p53==1)) * (p104==1))) + (EG(((p42==0)&&((p124==0)||(p152==0)))) * (EF((p8==0)) + (AF((p109==0)) * !(E((p85==1) U ...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!((E((p127==1) U (p53==1)) * (p104==1))))) + (EG(((p42==0)&&((p124==0)||(p152==0)))) * (E(TRU...233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t36, t37, t38, t63, t64, t67, t68, t70, t82, t83, t90, t91, t94, t95...310
(forward)formula 0,1,13.3979,453844,1,0,1258,2.98182e+06,349,547,4189,2.83462e+06,1452
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 132 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 132 transition count 154
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 130 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 130 transition count 152
Applied a total of 36 rules in 8 ms. Remains 130 /148 variables (removed 18) and now considering 152/170 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 151 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 19/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 4/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 152/282 variables, 130/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/282 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 282/282 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 10498 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 24/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 152/282 variables, 130/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 151/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 2/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 4/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/282 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 282/282 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 26442 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 36952ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36952ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 130/148 places, 152/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37067 ms. Remains : 130/148 places, 152/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 152 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6236883642311685160.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9209326189012971012.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6236883642311685160.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9209326189012971012.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.9653e+06,0.136706,10192,2,2619,5,24729,6,0,674,27959,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((!(A(!(((p32==1)&&(p73==1))) U (EX((p40==1)) + EX((p96==1))))) * (EG((p103==1)) + ((EX((p101==0)) * !(A((((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p29==...303
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * (!(!((E(!((EX((p40==1)) + EX((p96==1)))) U (!(!(((p32==1)&&(p73==1)))) * !((EX((p40==1)) + EX((p9...2022
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t33, t36, t37, t38, t64, t65, t68, t69, t71, t84, t90, t91, t94, t95, t97...317
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,29.2492,913092,1,0,2095,6.34032e+06,348,1089,4331,5.58994e+06,2270
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 130 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 130 transition count 152
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 126 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 126 transition count 148
Applied a total of 44 rules in 2 ms. Remains 126 /148 variables (removed 22) and now considering 148/170 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 126 cols
[2025-05-30 23:31:07] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:31:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 147 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:31:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 16/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 8/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 148/274 variables, 126/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 274/274 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 11146 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 29/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 148/274 variables, 126/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 147/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 3/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 274/274 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 41171ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41172ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/148 places, 148/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41290 ms. Remains : 126/148 places, 148/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6171794693899474138.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15205326049567861203.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6171794693899474138.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15205326049567861203.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86827e+06,0.150859,10168,2,2618,5,24884,6,0,654,28907,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((p61!=1)||(p57==1))) * !(E((!((AF((((p6==1)&&(p13==1))&&((p112==1)&&(p150==1)))) * EF((p57==1)))) + AX(AG((p86==1)))) U (EG(AX((p111...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(((p61!=1)||(p57==1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG((FwdU(Init,(!((!(EG(!((((p6==1)&&(p13==1))&&((p112==1)&&(p...273
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t36, t37, t38, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t83, t88, t89, t92, t93, t95...305
(forward)formula 0,1,22.2089,590044,1,0,1646,3.8443e+06,345,840,4161,3.51697e+06,1901
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 133 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 133 transition count 155
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 130 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 130 transition count 152
Applied a total of 36 rules in 3 ms. Remains 130 /148 variables (removed 18) and now considering 152/170 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 23:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:32:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 151 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:32:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 18/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 5/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 152/282 variables, 130/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 2/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/282 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 282/282 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 10611 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 27/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 4/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 152/282 variables, 130/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 151/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 5/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/282 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 282/282 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 40632ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40632ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 130/148 places, 152/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40751 ms. Remains : 130/148 places, 152/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:32:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 152 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:32:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16943955457343322474.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6334567383399884645.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16943955457343322474.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6334567383399884645.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.01526e+06,0.17017,11084,2,2696,5,27389,6,0,674,32951,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX(E((A((p153==1) U (p137==1)) * ((p122==1)||(p51==1))) U EF((p7==1)))) * (E(!(A((p38==1) U (p20==1))) U EX(EG((((p6==1)&&(p14==1))&&...462
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(FwdU((EY(Init) * EX(E((!((E(!((p137==1)) U (!((p153==1)) * !((p137==1)))) + EG(!((p137==1))))) * ((p12...1985
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t25, t34, t37, t38, t39, t63, t64, t67, t68, t70, t83, t88, t89, t92, t94, t95...304
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1171532838568243805.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1171532838568243805.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1171532838568243805.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1171532838568243805.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1171532838568243805.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16857974002780582173.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11520607777481987357.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16857974002780582173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11520607777481987357.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.01526e+06,0.037361,5412,305,71,2378,433,365,3887,62,1214,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX(E((A((i11.i1.u49.p153==1) U (i10.i0.u43.p137==1)) * ((i9.i0.u38.p122==1)||(i3.i1.u17.p51==1))) U EF((i0.i0.u1.p7==1)))) * (E(!(A((...743
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(FwdU((EY(Init) * EX(E((!((E(!((i10.i0.u43.p137==1)) U (!((i11.i1.u49.p153==1)) * !((i10.i0.u43.p137==1...3019
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t122, t149, i0.t120, i0.i1.t117, i0.i1.u2.t121, i1.u28.t34, i1.u28.t37, i1.u28.t38, i1.u28.t3...470
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
(forward)formula 0,0,1.63613,80932,1,0,145667,1302,2397,264083,332,9050,183638
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 133 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 133 transition count 155
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 129 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 129 transition count 151
Applied a total of 38 rules in 3 ms. Remains 129 /148 variables (removed 19) and now considering 151/170 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 129 cols
[2025-05-30 23:33:23] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:33:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 150 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:33:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 17/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 151/280 variables, 129/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 3/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/280 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 280/280 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 10806 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 24/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 151/280 variables, 129/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 150/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 3/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 280/280 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 40827ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40827ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/148 places, 151/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40951 ms. Remains : 129/148 places, 151/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 151 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10995577487175701032.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14900813979662713865.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10995577487175701032.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14900813979662713865.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.90278e+06,0.115733,9164,2,2447,5,20566,6,0,669,23455,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(!((EG((p146==1)) * EX(AF((p85==1)))))) U ((AX(FALSE) * !((EF((p71!=1)) * ((EF((p126==1)) + (EG((p45==1)) * AX((p144==1)))) + ((((p6=...302
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(EX(!(FALSE))) * !((E(TRUE U (p71!=1)) * ((E(TRUE U (p126==1)) + (EG((p45==1)) * !(EX(!((p14...1102
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t17, t18, t25, t33, t36, t38, t39, t53, t64, t65, t68, t69, t71, t74, t84, t85, t90, t91...314
(forward)formula 0,0,24.9698,832452,1,0,2727,5.69487e+06,358,1291,4272,5.0119e+06,3340
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 128 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 128 transition count 150
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 124 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 124 transition count 146
Applied a total of 48 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /148 variables (removed 24) and now considering 146/170 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 124 cols
[2025-05-30 23:34:29] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:34:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 145 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:34:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 15/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 6/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 270/270 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 9336 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 22/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 145/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 3/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 270/270 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 39356ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39358ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/148 places, 146/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39482 ms. Remains : 124/148 places, 146/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6243552778768975217.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12033133932148229691.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6243552778768975217.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12033133932148229691.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.72657e+06,0.175245,10036,2,2580,5,24320,6,0,644,28437,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(((p108==0) * AG((p145==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(((p108==0) * !(E(TRUE U !((p145==0)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t61, t62, t65, t66, t68, t81, t86, t87, t90, t91, t93...305
(forward)formula 0,0,1.99176,75048,1,0,312,426620,315,174,4111,317012,386
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 170/170 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 122 edges and 148 vertex of which 4 / 148 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 61 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 61 transitions
Performed 61 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 61
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 145 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 84 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 76 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 75 transition count 90
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 75 transition count 78
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 63 transition count 78
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 52 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 52 transition count 67
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 52 transition count 66
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 198 place count 49 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 49 transition count 61
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 49 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 47 transition count 57
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 38 transition count 48
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 38 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 37 transition count 46
Applied a total of 227 rules in 13 ms. Remains 37 /148 variables (removed 111) and now considering 46/170 (removed 124) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 37 cols
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/148 places, 46/170 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 35 transition count 45
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 35 /36 variables (removed 1) and now considering 45/46 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 35 cols
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/148 places, 45/170 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 127 ms. Remains : 35/148 places, 45/170 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13860754354903035113.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15896056836755210988.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13860754354903035113.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15896056836755210988.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8270,0.026223,4884,2,591,5,4516,6,0,180,5282,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((AF(((((((((p52==0)||(p77==0))||(p113==0))&&(p130==0)) + AG((p120==0))) * (p6==1)) * ((p14==1)&&(p45==1))) * (p112==1))) * (p6==1)) ...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p112==1)) * ((p9==1)&&(p45==1))) * (p6==1)) * !(EG(!(((((((((p52==0)||(p77==0))||(p113==...261
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t14, t16, t18, t26, t27, t30, t31, t32, t35, t39, t40, t41,...264
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.654482,34440,1,0,423,188588,124,227,1424,202735,385
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 597066 ms.

BK_STOP 1748648112027

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-02b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-02b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729700626"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-02b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-02b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;