Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729700625.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-02b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729700625
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 480K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 108K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748647503192

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-02b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 65 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Transformed 155 places.
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Transformed 194 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 155 places and 194 transitions and 620 arcs in 151 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 51 out of 155 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 155/155 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 140 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 140 transition count 179
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 140 transition count 163
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 139 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 139 transition count 162
Applied a total of 48 rules in 33 ms. Remains 139 /155 variables (removed 16) and now considering 162/194 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 139 cols
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:25:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 374 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:25:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/139 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 20/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 162/301 variables, 139/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/301 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 301/301 variables, and 176 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved in 13399 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 139/139 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/139 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 28/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 162/301 variables, 139/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 159/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 1/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 3/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 301/301 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 139/139 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/161 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 43480ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 43489ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 139/155 places, 160/194 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 138 transition count 160
Applied a total of 1 rules in 5 ms. Remains 138 /139 variables (removed 1) and now considering 160/160 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 138 cols
[2025-05-30 23:25:48] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:25:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 138/155 places, 160/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 44032 ms. Remains : 138/155 places, 160/194 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 138 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 23:25:48] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-05-30 23:25:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 23:25:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
Support contains 50 out of 138 places (down from 51) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (24 resets) in 1178 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 3/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (22 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 1/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (20 resets) in 73 ms. (540 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/42 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 96/138 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 160/298 variables, 138/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/298 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 298/298 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 189 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/42 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 96/138 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 160/298 variables, 138/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/298 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 298/298 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 268 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 483ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 208 steps, including 2 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=104 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 7 ms.
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
Computed a total of 31 stabilizing places and 31 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 126 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 126 transition count 148
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 124 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 124 transition count 146
Applied a total of 28 rules in 12 ms. Remains 124 /138 variables (removed 14) and now considering 146/160 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 124 cols
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:25:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 145 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:25:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 15/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 6/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 270/270 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 9596 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 22/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 145/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 3/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 270/270 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 39628ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39629ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/138 places, 146/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39768 ms. Remains : 124/138 places, 146/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1762389230832515789.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17158667914753425185.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1762389230832515789.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17158667914753425185.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.72657e+06,0.142046,9776,2,2580,5,24320,6,0,644,28437,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(AX((AX((p23==1)) * EF((p145==0)))) U !(((p124==0)||(p81==1)))) + !(E(A((((p116==0)||(p51==1)) + EX(TRUE)) U (EF((p92==1)) + (p148!=1))...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(!(((p124==0)||(p81==1)))) U (!(!(EX(!((!(EX(!((p23==1)))) * E(TRUE U (p145==0))))))) * !...409
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t61, t62, t65, t66, t68, t81, t86, t87, t90, t91, t93...305
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,20.9085,658276,1,0,2282,4.26479e+06,336,1252,4298,4.03124e+06,2499
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 127 edges and 138 vertex of which 4 / 138 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 59 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 59 transitions
Performed 59 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 59
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 135 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 76 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 68 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 66 transition count 81
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 66 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 59 transition count 74
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 53 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 53 transition count 68
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 51 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 51 transition count 64
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 51 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 49 transition count 60
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 32 transition count 43
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 32 transition count 42
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 29 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 29 transition count 35
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 29 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 27 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 26 transition count 32
Applied a total of 227 rules in 83 ms. Remains 26 /138 variables (removed 112) and now considering 32/160 (removed 128) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 26 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:50] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned [20, 25]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/138 places, 32/160 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 24 transition count 31
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 31
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 30
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 22 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/138 places, 30/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 262 ms. Remains : 22/138 places, 30/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 20 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (4 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13167703788235222691.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14324866545142003982.prop : 24 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13167703788235222691.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14324866545142003982.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 126 edges and 138 vertex of which 4 / 138 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 57 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 57 transitions
Performed 57 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 57
Iterating post reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 135 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 78 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 71 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 70 transition count 86
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 70 transition count 78
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 62 transition count 78
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 56 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 56 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 54 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 54 transition count 68
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 54 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 53 transition count 66
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 36 transition count 49
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 36 transition count 48
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 210 place count 33 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 33 transition count 41
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 32 transition count 40
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 32 transition count 38
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 32 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 31 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 29 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 28 transition count 35
Applied a total of 222 rules in 23 ms. Remains 28 /138 variables (removed 110) and now considering 35/160 (removed 125) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 28 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned [22, 27]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/138 places, 35/160 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 26 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 25 transition count 34
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 25 transition count 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 24 transition count 33
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 24 /26 variables (removed 2) and now considering 33/35 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 24 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 24/138 places, 33/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 184 ms. Remains : 24/138 places, 33/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12590172918565207703.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13656650285856601396.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12590172918565207703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13656650285856601396.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1296,0.008642,4012,2,98,5,741,6,0,128,817,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p81==0)||(p31==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p81==0)||(p31==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 29/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.019808,4524,1,0,8,3121,19,4,717,3157,8
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 127 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 127 transition count 149
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 125 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 125 transition count 147
Applied a total of 26 rules in 7 ms. Remains 125 /138 variables (removed 13) and now considering 147/160 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 125 cols
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:26:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 20/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 147/272 variables, 125/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 2/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/272 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 272/272 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 9680 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 23/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 147/272 variables, 125/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 146/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 4/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 272/272 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 39708ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39709ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/138 places, 147/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39841 ms. Remains : 125/138 places, 147/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 147 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12388321601415218741.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14733337089991021605.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12388321601415218741.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14733337089991021605.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.79584e+06,0.125788,9524,2,2580,5,22027,6,0,649,25455,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EF((EG((p132==0)) * A(((p128==0)||(p41==1)) U (p72==0)))) + ((p105==0)&&(p92==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(((p105==0)&&(p92==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U (EG((p132==0)) * !((E(!((p72==0)) U (!(((p128==0)||(p41==1)...206
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t38, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t82, t87, t88, t91, t92, t94...305
(forward)formula 0,1,16.3763,550056,1,0,1712,3.71616e+06,333,758,4158,3.28984e+06,1952
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 129 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 129 transition count 151
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 128 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 128 transition count 150
Applied a total of 20 rules in 14 ms. Remains 128 /138 variables (removed 10) and now considering 150/160 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 150 rows 128 cols
[2025-05-30 23:27:47] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:27:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 149 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:27:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 201 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 19/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 150/278 variables, 128/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/278 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 278/278 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved in 11045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 150/278 variables, 128/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 149/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 3/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 278/278 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 41084ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 149 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41084ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/138 places, 150/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41237 ms. Remains : 128/138 places, 150/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 150 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17270486564225667003.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18268316180378823570.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17270486564225667003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18268316180378823570.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.99067e+06,0.140306,10176,2,2718,5,24513,6,0,664,27955,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AX((((((p125==0)&&(p8==1))&&(p123==1)) + AX((p23==0))) + ((p137==1)&&(p132==0)))) + (p30==0)) + (p112==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p112==1))) * !((p30==0)))) * !(((p137==1)&&(p132==0)))) * !((((p125==0)&&(p8==1...196
(forward)formula 0,1,0.183347,10432,1,0,18,24513,17,9,1014,27955,7
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 127 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 127 transition count 149
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 126 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 126 transition count 148
Applied a total of 24 rules in 10 ms. Remains 126 /138 variables (removed 12) and now considering 148/160 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 126 cols
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 226 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 147 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 19/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 7/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 148/274 variables, 126/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 274/274 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 9937 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 27/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 148/274 variables, 126/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 147/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 4/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 274/274 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 20521 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 30475ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30475ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/138 places, 148/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30712 ms. Remains : 126/138 places, 148/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13065913883585605185.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5677391100337861362.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13065913883585605185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5677391100337861362.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.84148e+06,0.156013,10548,2,2549,5,25394,6,0,654,30763,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(EG(EX((p95==1))) U AG(((p43==0)||(p135==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p43==0)||(p135==1))))))) * !(EG(EX((p95==1))))),TRUE) * !(((p43==...256
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t25, t33, t36, t37, t38, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t82, t87, t88, t91, t92, t94...305
(forward)formula 0,0,4.5641,160736,1,0,405,881799,324,160,4111,803501,478
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 125 edges and 138 vertex of which 4 / 138 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 60 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 60 transitions
Performed 60 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 60
Iterating post reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 135 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 75 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 66 transition count 81
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 66 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 59 transition count 74
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 55 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 55 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 54 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 54 transition count 68
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 54 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 53 transition count 66
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 37 transition count 50
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 37 transition count 49
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 208 place count 35 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 35 transition count 45
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 34 transition count 44
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 34 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 32 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 31 transition count 41
Applied a total of 216 rules in 32 ms. Remains 31 /138 variables (removed 107) and now considering 41/160 (removed 119) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 31 cols
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned [25, 30]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/138 places, 41/160 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 29 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 28 transition count 40
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 28 transition count 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 27 transition count 39
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 27 /29 variables (removed 2) and now considering 39/41 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 27 cols
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 63 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 27/138 places, 39/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 240 ms. Remains : 27/138 places, 39/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9796717466921594731.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1455710340265489510.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9796717466921594731.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1455710340265489510.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1410,0.009755,4112,2,175,5,1210,6,0,146,1253,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p78==0)&&(p58==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p78==0)&&(p58==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 34/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,0.02501,4752,1,0,8,4665,20,4,826,3840,8
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 128 edges and 138 vertex of which 2 / 138 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 61 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 61 transitions
Performed 61 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 61
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 136 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 75 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 66 transition count 81
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 66 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 59 transition count 74
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 54 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 54 transition count 69
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 52 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 52 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 52 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 50 transition count 61
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 33 transition count 44
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 33 transition count 43
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 220 place count 30 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 30 transition count 36
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 29 transition count 35
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 29 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 27 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 26 transition count 32
Applied a total of 229 rules in 16 ms. Remains 26 /138 variables (removed 112) and now considering 32/160 (removed 128) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 26 cols
[2025-05-30 23:29:04] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 28 ms returned [19, 25]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/138 places, 32/160 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 24 transition count 31
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 31
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 30
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 22 cols
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/138 places, 30/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 117 ms. Remains : 22/138 places, 30/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18075993851441748364.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5575739327675340767.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18075993851441748364.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5575739327675340767.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 108 steps (5 resets) in 4 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 128 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 128 transition count 150
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 126 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 126 transition count 148
Applied a total of 24 rules in 4 ms. Remains 126 /138 variables (removed 12) and now considering 148/160 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 148 rows 126 cols
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 147 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 18/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 5/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 148/274 variables, 126/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 274/274 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 9552 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 24/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 148/274 variables, 126/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 147/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 274/274 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 39580ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 147 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39581ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/138 places, 148/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39691 ms. Remains : 126/138 places, 148/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9353945097077276380.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality25877652789448035.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9353945097077276380.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality25877652789448035.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76849e+06,0.165192,10296,2,2656,5,25518,6,0,654,28430,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((AF((p40==1)) * AF((E((p11==0) U (p128==1)) * (p22==1)))) * (!(E(((p33==1)||(p34==1)) U ((p117==0)||(p40==1)))) * EX(TRUE))) * (AX(F...208
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((!(EG(!((p40==1)))) * !(EG(!((E((p11==0) U (p128==1)) * (p22==1)))))) * (!(E(((p33==1)||(p34==1))...316
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t33, t37, t38, t62, t63, t66, t67, t69, t82, t87, t88, t91, t92, t94, t97...305
(forward)formula 0,0,13.242,457596,1,0,1130,3.02894e+06,324,492,4211,2.88079e+06,1290
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 126 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 126 transition count 148
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 124 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 124 transition count 146
Applied a total of 28 rules in 4 ms. Remains 124 /138 variables (removed 14) and now considering 146/160 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 146 rows 124 cols
[2025-05-30 23:29:58] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:29:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 145 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:29:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 15/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 6/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/270 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 270/270 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 9447 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 22/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 146/270 variables, 124/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 145/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 3/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 270/270 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 39493ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 145 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39494ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/138 places, 146/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39627 ms. Remains : 124/138 places, 146/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16284314692616421722.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4310949296942939852.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16284314692616421722.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4310949296942939852.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.72657e+06,0.142993,10160,2,2580,5,24320,6,0,644,28437,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(AF((p17==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),!((p17==0)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 144/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,1.8627,74884,1,0,132,349993,21,3,3396,326046,134
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 129 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 129 transition count 151
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 127 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 127 transition count 149
Applied a total of 22 rules in 2 ms. Remains 127 /138 variables (removed 11) and now considering 149/160 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 149 rows 127 cols
[2025-05-30 23:30:39] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:30:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 148 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:30:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 17/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 10/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 3/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 149/276 variables, 127/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 2/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/276 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 276/276 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved in 10389 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 32/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 149/276 variables, 127/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 148/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 2/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 2/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 276/276 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 40423ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 148 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40423ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/138 places, 149/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40559 ms. Remains : 127/138 places, 149/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 149 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4193697207307017032.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12905025193120695086.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4193697207307017032.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12905025193120695086.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88044e+06,0.162656,10936,2,2747,5,27595,6,0,659,32004,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(AX(A(((p62==1)||(p61==1)) U (p44!=1))) U (((((p8==0)||(p61==1)) * AX((p146==1))) + (!(AX((p39==0))) * (p102==1))) * AF((AF((p111==1))...188
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(EX(!(!((E(!((p44!=1)) U (!(((p62==1)||(p61==1))) * !((p44!=1)))) + EG(!((p44!=1))))))))) * ((((p8...305
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t61, t62, t65, t66, t68, t82, t87, t88, t91, t93, t94...298
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,27.0393,888612,1,0,2436,6.04718e+06,352,1343,4243,5.43191e+06,2926
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 127 edges and 138 vertex of which 4 / 138 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 61 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 61 transitions
Performed 61 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 61
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 135 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 74 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 65 transition count 80
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 65 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 58 transition count 73
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 52 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 52 transition count 67
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 176 place count 50 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 50 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 50 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 48 transition count 59
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 32 transition count 43
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 32 transition count 42
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 30 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 221 place count 30 transition count 38
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 29 transition count 37
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 29 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 27 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 26 transition count 34
Applied a total of 227 rules in 19 ms. Remains 26 /138 variables (removed 112) and now considering 34/160 (removed 126) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 26 cols
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned [20, 25]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/138 places, 34/160 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 24 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 33
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 32
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 32/34 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 22 cols
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/138 places, 32/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 173 ms. Remains : 22/138 places, 32/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10365935037070603929.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality320942544796626241.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10365935037070603929.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality320942544796626241.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1000,0.015463,4080,2,100,5,970,6,0,119,1115,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EF(EG((p46==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U EG((p46==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t8, t10, t11, t30, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (de...198
(forward)formula 0,1,0.059311,6128,1,0,153,11289,90,75,932,13300,161
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 160/160 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 127 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 127 transition count 149
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 125 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 125 transition count 147
Applied a total of 26 rules in 5 ms. Remains 125 /138 variables (removed 13) and now considering 147/160 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 125 cols
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:31:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 13/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 5/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 147/272 variables, 125/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 2/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/272 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 272/272 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 9869 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 22/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 147/272 variables, 125/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 146/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 2/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 2/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 4/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 272/272 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 39890ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39892ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/138 places, 147/160 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40051 ms. Remains : 125/138 places, 147/160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 147 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14206138478857205425.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17593573417380168715.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14206138478857205425.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17593573417380168715.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.77244e+06,0.121543,9520,2,2584,5,22226,6,0,649,25670,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((AX(((p20==0)||(p37==1))) + E((p61==1) U (p102==1))) + ((p127==0) * AG((p49!=0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((!(EX(!(((p20==0)||(p37==1))))) + E((p61==1) U (p102==1))) + ((p127==0) * !(E(TRUE U !(...179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t61, t62, t65, t66, t68, t81, t86, t87, t90, t91, t93...305
(forward)formula 0,1,2.32403,90292,1,0,449,423063,330,185,4171,416616,519
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-02b-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 23:32:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:32:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 445922 ms.

BK_STOP 1748647950363

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-02b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-02b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729700625"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-02b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-02b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;