Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729600609.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutonomousCar-PT-01b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729600609
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 436K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748646747431

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutonomousCar-PT-01b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 23:12:28] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 23:12:28] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 23:12:28] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 55 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:28] [INFO ] Transformed 119 places.
[2025-05-30 23:12:28] [INFO ] Transformed 132 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:12:28] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 23:12:28] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 119 places and 132 transitions and 339 arcs in 139 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 73 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 117 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 117 transition count 130
Applied a total of 4 rules in 20 ms. Remains 117 /119 variables (removed 2) and now considering 130/132 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 117 cols
[2025-05-30 23:12:28] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 194 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:12:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 342 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 129 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:12:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 1692 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 297 ms of which 245 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 129 unsolved
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 130/247 variables, 117/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/247 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 247/247 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved in 9392 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 129/129 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/117 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 130/247 variables, 117/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 127/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/247 variables, 3/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/247 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 247/247 variables, and 280 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved in 29680 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 127/129 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 39145ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 127 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 2 dead transitions in 39171ms
Found 2 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 2 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/119 places, 128/132 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 117 /117 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 39554 ms. Remains : 117/119 places, 128/132 transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 70 out of 116 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 23:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
Support contains 66 out of 116 places (down from 70) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (19 resets) in 1593 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 3/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (21 resets) in 134 ms. (296 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (11 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (13 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 116 cols
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 41/46 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 70/116 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 128/244 variables, 116/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/244 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 63 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/46 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/244 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 99 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 170ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
Computed a total of 29 stabilizing places and 29 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 99 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 99 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 99 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 95 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 95 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 94 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 94 transition count 102
Applied a total of 48 rules in 17 ms. Remains 94 /116 variables (removed 22) and now considering 102/128 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 94 cols
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 101 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:13:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 13/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/196 variables, 94/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 196/196 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 4652 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 16/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/196 variables, 94/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 101/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 3/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 196/196 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 16972 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 21649ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 21649ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/116 places, 102/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21775 ms. Remains : 94/116 places, 102/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:13:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:13:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11570485157542703379.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8584120160595227326.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11570485157542703379.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8584120160595227326.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,65988,0.036316,5004,2,1074,5,4446,6,0,480,3733,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((p117==1) + AF(((!(((p6==0)||(p90==1))) * EX(TRUE)) * AX((p25==1))))) + (p56==1)) U (p112!=0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((p112!=0))))) * !(E(!((p112!=0)) U (!((((p117==1) + !(EG(!(((!(((p6==0)||(p90==1))) * EX(TRUE))...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t57, t58, t61, t62, t64, t77, t84, t86, t91, t99, In...251
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,3.4978,141992,1,0,1302,981853,239,695,2826,835821,1383
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 99 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 99 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 99 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 95 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 95 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 94 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 94 transition count 102
Applied a total of 48 rules in 18 ms. Remains 94 /116 variables (removed 22) and now considering 102/128 (removed 26) transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:13:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:13:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 101 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:13:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 13/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/196 variables, 94/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 196/196 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 4571 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 16/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/196 variables, 94/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 101/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 3/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 196/196 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 16972 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 21562ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 21563ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/116 places, 102/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21690 ms. Remains : 94/116 places, 102/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8851934923339235490.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9549598465708095249.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8851934923339235490.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9549598465708095249.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,65988,0.029474,5044,2,1074,5,4446,6,0,480,3733,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AG((p42==1))) + EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EX(TRUE))),!(!(E(TRUE U !((p42==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t57, t58, t61, t62, t64, t77, t84, t86, t91, t99, In...251
(forward)formula 0,1,0.537489,27996,1,0,249,110766,229,99,2817,111762,297
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 102 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 102 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 102 transition count 110
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 99 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 99 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 98 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 98 transition count 106
Applied a total of 40 rules in 16 ms. Remains 98 /116 variables (removed 18) and now considering 106/128 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 98 cols
[2025-05-30 23:13:57] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:13:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 105 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:13:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 14/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 5/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 106/204 variables, 98/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 204/204 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 5956 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 19/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 106/204 variables, 98/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 105/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 3/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 204/204 variables, and 232 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 8591 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 14566ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14567ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/116 places, 106/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14697 ms. Remains : 98/116 places, 106/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8606517868956110940.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9282943249950834098.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8606517868956110940.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9282943249950834098.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,70658,0.040041,5064,2,1148,5,4866,6,0,500,3991,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX((p49==1))) * E((((AG(EX((p70==1))) * (EG(AG(((p18==0)||(p71==1)))) + (p6!=1))) + (p40==0)) + (p74==1)) U ((p0!=1) * AX(EF(((p106==...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EX((p49==1))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E((((!(E(TRUE U !(EX((p70==1))))) * (EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((p18==0...276
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t33, t38, t39, t59, t60, t63, t64, t66, t69, t81, t88, t90, t95, t103, I...252
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.2352,101300,1,0,738,648699,256,425,3080,580270,753
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 102 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 102 transition count 114
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 98 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 98 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 97 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 97 transition count 109
Applied a total of 38 rules in 15 ms. Remains 97 /116 variables (removed 19) and now considering 109/128 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 97 cols
[2025-05-30 23:14:14] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:14:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 18/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 2/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 109/206 variables, 97/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/206 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 206/206 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 5746 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 21/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 2/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 109/206 variables, 97/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 108/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 3/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/206 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 206/206 variables, and 239 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 15052 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 20807ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20808ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/116 places, 109/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20926 ms. Remains : 97/116 places, 109/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6366569613688555321.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11128270150210115253.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6366569613688555321.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11128270150210115253.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,72708,0.030878,5084,2,1134,5,4786,6,0,499,3982,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EF(AG((p27==0)))) * (E(AF(EX(((p75==0)||(p60==1)))) U !(AG((E((p52==0) U ((p57==0)||(p4==1))) + EX((p25==1)))))) + EX(TRUE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p27==0)))))))] = FALSE * [((Init * !(EX(TRUE))) * !(E(!(EG(!(EX(((p75==0)...255
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t37, t38, t53, t59, t60, t63, t64, t66, t79, t86, t88, t89, t97...261
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.07985,53912,1,0,317,293837,258,138,3161,237492,389
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 84 edges and 116 vertex of which 4 / 116 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 113 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 73 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 69 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 64 transition count 72
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 64 transition count 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 58 transition count 66
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 47 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 47 transition count 55
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 47 transition count 49
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 47 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 46 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 45 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 45 transition count 47
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 38 transition count 40
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 37 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 37 transition count 38
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 37 transition count 37
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 37 transition count 37
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 36 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 36 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 35 transition count 35
Applied a total of 170 rules in 30 ms. Remains 35 /116 variables (removed 81) and now considering 35/128 (removed 93) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 35 cols
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 24 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/116 places, 35/128 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 33 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 33 transition count 34
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 33 /34 variables (removed 1) and now considering 34/35 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 33 cols
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned [20, 29]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 31/116 places, 34/128 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 31 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 30 transition count 33
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /31 variables (removed 1) and now considering 33/34 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 30 cols
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 30/116 places, 33/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 260 ms. Remains : 30/116 places, 33/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18269442555342995552.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10139922836297194010.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18269442555342995552.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10139922836297194010.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1022,0.005739,3904,2,125,5,525,6,0,151,446,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF(((p54==0)||(p114==1))) * (((p13==1)||(p12==1))||((p102==1)&&((p111==0)||(p106==1))))) * (((p77==1)&&((p118==0)||(p9==1)))||((p44=...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U ((p54==0)||(p114==1))) * (((p13==1)||(p12==1))||((p102==1)&&((p111==0)||(p106==1))))) * ...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t10, t15, t18, t20, t32, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...192
(forward)formula 0,0,0.052048,6464,1,0,175,14014,94,99,916,17221,160
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 85 edges and 116 vertex of which 4 / 116 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 42 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 42 transitions
Performed 42 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 42
Iterating post reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 113 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 71 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 69 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 64 transition count 74
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 64 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 57 transition count 67
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 51 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 51 transition count 61
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 51 transition count 57
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 49 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 49 transition count 55
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 42 transition count 48
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 42 transition count 46
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 42 transition count 46
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 42 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 40 transition count 44
Applied a total of 155 rules in 16 ms. Remains 40 /116 variables (removed 76) and now considering 44/128 (removed 84) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 40 cols
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned [32, 38]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/116 places, 44/128 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 38 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 37 transition count 43
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 37 transition count 42
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 36 transition count 42
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 36 /38 variables (removed 2) and now considering 42/44 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 36 cols
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 59 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/116 places, 42/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 137 ms. Remains : 36/116 places, 42/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1015957927611159529.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8433767990316906158.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1015957927611159529.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8433767990316906158.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,730,0.009826,4092,2,245,5,1247,6,0,181,1253,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((E((p39==0) U (((p84==0)||(p41==1))&&(p118==0))) + ((EF((p44==1)) * AG(((p42==0)||(p69==1)))) * EF((p68==0)))) + (EF((p8==1)) * ((...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((E((p39==0) U (((p84==0)||(p41==1))&&(p118==0))) + ((E(TRUE U (p44==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t5, t7, t10, t11, t12, t15, t17, t18, t26, t29, t32, t35, t40, Intersection with rea...231
(forward)formula 0,1,0.078975,7676,1,0,169,20406,120,75,1112,22369,187
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 101 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 101 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 101 transition count 109
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 98 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 98 transition count 106
Applied a total of 40 rules in 11 ms. Remains 98 /116 variables (removed 18) and now considering 106/128 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 98 cols
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 105 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:14:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 13/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 4/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 106/204 variables, 98/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 204/204 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 5423 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 19/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 106/204 variables, 98/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 105/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 3/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 204/204 variables, and 235 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 17968 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 23399ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23399ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/116 places, 106/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23496 ms. Remains : 98/116 places, 106/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11329836351554838406.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6329393290446254420.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11329836351554838406.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6329393290446254420.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,80730,0.030748,5064,2,1047,5,4535,6,0,500,3647,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((p113==1)||(p21==1))) U EF(((p100==1) * A(EX(((p85==0)||(p41==1))) U !(EF((p76==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(((p113==1)||(p21==1)))),TRUE) * (p100==1)) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U (p76==1))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(T...244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, t18, t27, t35, t38, t39, t40, t60, t61, t64, t65, t67, t80, t87, t89, t94, t103, I...252
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 102/4/4
(forward)formula 0,1,3.63284,139488,1,0,1036,938482,252,693,3407,776552,1151
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 98 edges and 116 vertex of which 4 / 116 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 51 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 51 transitions
Performed 51 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 51
Iterating post reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 113 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 62 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 59 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 57 transition count 64
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 57 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 52 transition count 59
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 44 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 44 transition count 51
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 44 transition count 47
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 44 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 42 transition count 45
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 35 transition count 38
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 35 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 33 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 32 transition count 35
Applied a total of 170 rules in 11 ms. Remains 32 /116 variables (removed 84) and now considering 35/128 (removed 93) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 32 cols
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned [22, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/116 places, 35/128 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 30 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 34
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 33
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 28 /30 variables (removed 2) and now considering 33/35 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 28 cols
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 28/116 places, 33/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 143 ms. Remains : 28/116 places, 33/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12577973790308358209.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5229549430694706089.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12577973790308358209.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5229549430694706089.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,361,0.007988,3904,2,124,5,592,6,0,143,573,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A((p25==1) U ((p27==0)||(p32==1))) * AF((AF(((p114==1)&&(p28==0))) + AG(((p35==1)&&(p117==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,!(((p27==0)||(p32==1)))) * (!((p25==1)) * !(((p27==0)||(p32==1)))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(((p27=...282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t4, t5, t6, t8, t11, t26, t27, t28, t31, Intersection with reachable at each step enable...205
(forward)formula 0,0,0.065118,7104,1,0,342,18333,99,169,892,20744,369
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 100 edges and 116 vertex of which 4 / 116 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 113 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 61 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 58 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 53 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 51 transition count 57
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 51 transition count 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 47 transition count 53
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 38 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 38 transition count 44
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 38 transition count 40
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 38 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 36 transition count 38
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 34 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 34 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 34 transition count 35
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 26 transition count 27
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 25 transition count 25
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 25 transition count 25
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 25 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 23 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 22 transition count 23
Applied a total of 194 rules in 11 ms. Remains 22 /116 variables (removed 94) and now considering 23/128 (removed 105) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 22 cols
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned [15, 21]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 63 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/116 places, 23/128 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 20 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 19 transition count 22
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 19 transition count 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 18 transition count 21
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 18 /20 variables (removed 2) and now considering 21/23 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 18 cols
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 17 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 18/116 places, 21/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 132 ms. Remains : 18/116 places, 21/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 21 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10801067931408695503.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5865233657836757877.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10801067931408695503.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5865233657836757877.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144,0.00405,3828,2,65,5,335,6,0,92,326,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((((p34==0)||(p61==0))||(p109==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (((p34==0)||(p61==0))||(p109==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t16, t17, t19, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,1,0.010878,4084,1,0,48,1708,66,25,586,1780,56
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 102 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 102 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 102 transition count 110
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 100 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 100 transition count 108
Applied a total of 36 rules in 4 ms. Remains 100 /116 variables (removed 16) and now considering 108/128 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 100 cols
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 4/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 108/208 variables, 100/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/208 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 208/208 variables, and 127 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 4669 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 21/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 108/208 variables, 100/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 107/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 3/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/208 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 208/208 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 13512 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 18189ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18189ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/116 places, 108/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18297 ms. Remains : 100/116 places, 108/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3614708535438582094.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11953603931358703032.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3614708535438582094.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11953603931358703032.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,72630,0.030206,5088,2,1136,5,4797,6,0,510,3995,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(AX(((p7==1)||(((p70!=1)&&((p101==0)||(p6==1)))&&(p100==1)))) U (E((p62!=0) U (p88==1)) * EF((p26!=0))))) * (AF(((p21==1)&&((p54==0)|...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!((E((p62!=0) U (p88==1)) * E(TRUE U (p26!=0))))))) * !(E(!((E((p62!=0) U (p88==1)) * E(TRUE U (...488
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t26, t35, t40, t41, t61, t62, t65, t66, t68, t81, t88, t91, t92, t96, t105, I...252
(forward)formula 0,0,2.38803,101820,1,0,912,657514,249,410,2857,570752,1073
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 99 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 99 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 99 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 95 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 95 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 94 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 94 transition count 102
Applied a total of 48 rules in 11 ms. Remains 94 /116 variables (removed 22) and now considering 102/128 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 94 cols
[2025-05-30 23:15:25] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:15:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 101 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 13/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/196 variables, 94/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 196/196 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 4514 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/94 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 16/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/196 variables, 94/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 101/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 3/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 196/196 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 16743 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 21266ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 21267ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/116 places, 102/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21395 ms. Remains : 94/116 places, 102/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11179692161454264989.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15055454540064285120.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11179692161454264989.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15055454540064285120.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,65988,0.032895,4924,2,1074,5,4446,6,0,480,3733,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(TRUE))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t32, t35, t36, t37, t57, t58, t61, t62, t64, t77, t84, t86, t91, t99, In...251
(forward)formula 0,1,0.913399,45800,1,0,551,189836,225,323,2671,259958,519
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 102 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 102 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 102 transition count 110
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 99 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 99 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 98 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 98 transition count 106
Applied a total of 40 rules in 4 ms. Remains 98 /116 variables (removed 18) and now considering 106/128 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 98 cols
[2025-05-30 23:15:47] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:15:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 105 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:15:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 106/204 variables, 98/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 204/204 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 6130 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 17/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 106/204 variables, 98/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 105/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 3/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 204/204 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 18470 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 24611ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24612ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/116 places, 106/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24709 ms. Remains : 98/116 places, 106/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12617189773861939556.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15544878209657521596.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12617189773861939556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15544878209657521596.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,71510,0.029813,5064,2,1124,5,4793,6,0,500,3884,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EG((p86==1))) + EF(((AG((p40==0)) * EX((p21==1))) * ((p30==0) * AG(E((p70==0) U (p48==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),(p86==1))] != FALSE + [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(E(TRUE U !((p40==0)))) * EX((p21==1)))) * (p30==0...210
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t24, t34, t39, t40, t60, t61, t64, t65, t67, t81, t88, t90, t95, t103, Inters...247
(forward)formula 0,1,0.706595,36788,1,0,280,182941,250,119,2939,161823,340
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 99 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 99 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 99 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 95 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 95 transition count 103
Applied a total of 46 rules in 5 ms. Remains 95 /116 variables (removed 21) and now considering 103/128 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:16:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 102 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 103/198 variables, 95/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 198/198 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved in 5436 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 102/102 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 19/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 103/198 variables, 95/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 102/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 4/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 198/198 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved in 11908 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 102/102 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 17350ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17350ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/116 places, 103/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17441 ms. Remains : 95/116 places, 103/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17050842554993594723.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15339470659305057090.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17050842554993594723.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15339470659305057090.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,67878,0.026523,4920,2,989,5,4218,6,0,485,3251,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(!(((!(((p102==0)||(p28==1))||(p107==1)))&&((p117==0)||(p102==1)))) U (p90!=0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),!((p90!=0))) * (!(!(((!(((p102==0)||(p28==1))||(p107==1)))&&((p117==0)||(p102==1))))) * !((p90!...210
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 101/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.311947,18812,1,0,91,73788,20,4,2272,58468,88
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 116/116 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 100 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 100 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 100 transition count 108
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 97 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 97 transition count 105
Applied a total of 42 rules in 5 ms. Remains 97 /116 variables (removed 19) and now considering 105/128 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 97 cols
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 104 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:16:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 105/202 variables, 97/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 5271 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 18/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 105/202 variables, 97/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 104/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 4/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 9153 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 14428ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14429ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/116 places, 105/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14528 ms. Remains : 97/116 places, 105/128 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:16:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 23:16:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11362752454386204817.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2279186509850006161.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11362752454386204817.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2279186509850006161.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,70440,0.032228,5056,2,1148,5,4658,6,0,495,3914,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG((AF(((p22==0)||(p90==1))) + EG(((p33==0)||(p101==1))))) * ((p55==0)||(p36==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((EY(Init) * ((p55==0)||(p36==1))),(!(EG(!(((p22==0)||(p90==1))))) + EG(((p33==0)||(p101==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t16, t17, t25, t33, t36, t37, t38, t58, t59, t62, t64, t65, t66, t79, t86, t88, t102, I...252
(forward)formula 0,1,2.49652,107784,1,0,902,691527,241,406,2939,631102,1039
FORMULA AutonomousCar-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 23:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 23:16:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 259257 ms.

BK_STOP 1748647007904

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutonomousCar-PT-01b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutonomousCar-PT-01b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729600609"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutonomousCar-PT-01b.tgz
mv AutonomousCar-PT-01b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;