Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729500567.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-24b, examination is ReachabilityFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500567
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 976K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 538K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748636779828

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=ReachabilityFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-24b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
ReachabilityFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 20:26:21] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, ReachabilityFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 20:26:21] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 20:26:21] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 151 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:21] [INFO ] Transformed 2230 places.
[2025-05-30 20:26:21] [INFO ] Transformed 2228 transitions.
[2025-05-30 20:26:21] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 20:26:21] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 2230 places and 2228 transitions and 5186 arcs in 308 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/ReachabilityFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (36 resets) in 1530 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 8/16 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 494 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 190 ms. (209 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 180 ms. (221 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 471 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 179 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-05-30 20:26:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 344 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 176 ms. (226 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 176 ms. (226 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-05-30 20:26:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 144 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15674966061680129061.gal : 65 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6476473290542649089.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15674966061680129061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6476473290542649089.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
// Phase 1: matrix 2228 rows 2230 cols

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
[2025-05-30 20:26:22] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 59 ms
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6476473290542649089.prop.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 128/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1926/2054 variables, 138/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2054 variables, 1926/2192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2054 variables, 0/2192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 60/2114 variables, 9/2201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2114 variables, 60/2261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2114 variables, 0/2261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :8 after 17
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 116/2230 variables, 1/2262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :17 after 34
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2230 variables, 116/2378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 2230/4458 variables, and 2378 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 5047 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 2230/2230 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 147/147 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/2230 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 128/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1926/2054 variables, 138/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :34 after 67
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2054 variables, 1926/2192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 128
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD size :67 after 129
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :129 after 1.39286e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :1.39286e+06 after 7.52539e+15
SDD proceeding with computation,8 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :7.52539e+15 after 1.19618e+36
[2025-05-30 20:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 310 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 495 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 283 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 266 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 251 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 311 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 282 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 304 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 232 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 2054/4458 variables, and 2201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 5009 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 2054/2230 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 138/147 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/2230 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/6 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10304ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 128 out of 2230 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 2230/2230 places, 2228/2228 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 741 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 741 transitions
Performed 741 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 741
Iterating post reduction 0 with 741 rules applied. Total rules applied 741 place count 2230 transition count 1487
Reduce places removed 741 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 89 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 89 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 1 with 863 rules applied. Total rules applied 1604 place count 1489 transition count 1365
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 53 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 2 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 1690 place count 1456 transition count 1312
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 1754 place count 1403 transition count 1301
Performed 258 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 258 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1754 place count 1403 transition count 1043
Deduced a syphon composed of 258 places in 4 ms
Reduce places removed 258 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 516 rules applied. Total rules applied 2270 place count 1145 transition count 1043
Discarding 177 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 177 rule applications. Total rules 2447 place count 968 transition count 866
Iterating global reduction 4 with 177 rules applied. Total rules applied 2624 place count 968 transition count 866
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2626 place count 968 transition count 864
Performed 59 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 59 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2626 place count 968 transition count 805
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 11 ms
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 2744 place count 909 transition count 805
Performed 188 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 188 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 188 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 376 rules applied. Total rules applied 3120 place count 721 transition count 617
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 3126 place count 718 transition count 617
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 13 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 13 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 3139 place count 718 transition count 604
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3141 place count 717 transition count 603
Free-agglomeration rule applied 81 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 81 rules applied. Total rules applied 3222 place count 717 transition count 522
Reduce places removed 81 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 81 rules applied. Total rules applied 3303 place count 636 transition count 522
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3304 place count 635 transition count 521
Applied a total of 3304 rules in 670 ms. Remains 635 /2230 variables (removed 1595) and now considering 521/2228 (removed 1707) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 678 ms. Remains : 635/2230 places, 521/2228 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (251 resets) in 682 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 4/8 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (25 resets) in 473 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (29 resets) in 178 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (29 resets) in 201 ms. (198 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (25 resets) in 222 ms. (179 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL BESTFIRST_WALK
// Phase 1: matrix 521 rows 635 cols
[2025-05-30 20:26:34] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 174 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 285/315 variables, 75/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 233/548 variables, 71/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 87/635 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 521/1156 variables, 635/783 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1156 variables, 174/957 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1156 variables, 0/957 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/1156 variables, 0/957 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1156/1156 variables, and 957 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 936 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 146/146 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 635/635 constraints, ReadFeed: 174/174 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 285/315 variables, 75/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 461 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 3/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 233/548 variables, 71/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 87/635 variables, 2/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 107 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 180 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 168 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 163 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 168 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 157 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 146 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 158 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 149 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 144 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 152 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 147 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 163 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 171 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 153 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 156 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 160 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 153 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 156 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 155 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 151 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 140 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 165 places in 179 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 168 places in 143 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 174 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 144 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 158 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 155 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 154 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 141 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 155 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 152 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 147 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 166 places in 148 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 188 places in 154 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 156 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 146 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 203 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 147 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 159 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 147 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 149 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 147 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 149 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 167 places in 177 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 193 places in 132 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 178 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 166 places in 169 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 138 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 163 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 195 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 170 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 165 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 167 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 147 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 170 places in 154 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 171 places in 138 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 193 places in 130 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 156 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 163 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 137 places in 147 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 171 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 148 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 180 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 306 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 152 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 160 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 148 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 138 places in 150 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 158 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 145 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 142 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 150 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 138 places in 144 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 137 places in 164 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 144 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 168 places in 145 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 169 places in 142 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 197 places in 135 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 194 places in 128 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 193 places in 138 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 192 places in 131 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 190 places in 154 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 188 places in 135 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 148 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 158 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 170 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 162 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 161 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 161 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 170 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 145 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 122 places in 144 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 142 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 142 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 142 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 172 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 165 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 158 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 152 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 161 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 149 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 153 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 181 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 161 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 152 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 180 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 155 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 158 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 142 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 155 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 153 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 150 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 161 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 163 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 180 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 165 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 171 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 160 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 167 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 155 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 160 places in 146 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 185 places in 144 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 183 places in 149 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 141 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 160 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 146 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 152 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 132 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 134 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 156 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 135 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 141 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 140 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 146 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 143 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 138 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 143 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 161 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 149 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 141 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 157 places in 148 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 182 places in 142 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 215 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 140 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 144 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 156 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 143 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 122 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 137 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 138 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 134 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 133 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 138 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 153 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 150 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 143 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 139 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 139 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 140 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 137 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 153 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 136 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 132 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 154 places in 575 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 181 places in 130 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 157 places in 139 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 184 places in 135 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 142 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 134 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 143 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 124 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 152 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 144 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 161 places in 144 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 184 places in 140 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 158 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 119 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 142 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 138 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 136 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 142 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 129 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 160 places in 155 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 183 places in 133 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 137 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 133 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 137 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 142 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 177 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 138 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 136 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 137 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 139 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 140 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 144 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 133 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 129 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 143 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 139 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 151 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 134 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 136 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 127 places in 139 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 156 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 138 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 136 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 145 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 132 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 140 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 143 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 138 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 141 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/635 variables, 20/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 160 places in 144 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 187 places in 129 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 143 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 139 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 133 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 144 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 136 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 140 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 157 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 137 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 140 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 162 places in 151 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 188 places in 122 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 131 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 189 places in 121 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 189 places in 125 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 188 places in 129 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 188 places in 125 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 185 places in 136 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 20:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 190 places in 135 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 46004ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 30 out of 635 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 635/635 places, 521/521 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 51 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 51 transitions
Performed 51 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 51
Iterating post reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 635 transition count 470
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 584 transition count 466
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 582 transition count 465
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 581 transition count 465
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 581 transition count 440
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 556 transition count 440
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 549 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 549 transition count 433
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 549 transition count 431
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 549 transition count 429
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 547 transition count 429
Performed 57 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 490 transition count 372
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 490 transition count 368
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 489 transition count 367
Free-agglomeration rule applied 13 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 489 transition count 354
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 476 transition count 354
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 474 transition count 352
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 7 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 436 transition count 334
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 8 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 418 transition count 333
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 417 transition count 333
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 10 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 417 transition count 304
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 388 transition count 304
Applied a total of 462 rules in 150 ms. Remains 388 /635 variables (removed 247) and now considering 304/521 (removed 217) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 388/635 places, 304/521 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 4372 steps (50 resets) in 34 ms. (124 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-24b-ReachabilityFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
All properties solved without resorting to model-checking.
Total runtime 59689 ms.

BK_STOP 1748636840745

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ ReachabilityFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution ReachabilityFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination ReachabilityFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-24b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="ReachabilityFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-24b, examination is ReachabilityFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500567"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-24b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-24b execution
cd execution
if [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "ReachabilityFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "ReachabilityFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' ReachabilityFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "ReachabilityFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME ReachabilityFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;