Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729500538.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-12a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500538
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 126K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748629326139

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-12a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 18:22:07] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 18:22:07] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 18:22:07] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 86 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:07] [INFO ] Transformed 307 places.
[2025-05-30 18:22:07] [INFO ] Transformed 305 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:07] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 18:22:07] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 307 places and 305 transitions and 980 arcs in 179 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 60 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 60 transitions.
Support contains 128 out of 307 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 307/307 places, 245/245 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 307 /307 variables (removed 0) and now considering 245/245 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 307 cols
[2025-05-30 18:22:07] [INFO ] Computed 76 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1419 ms returned [77, 84, 87, 90, 93, 96, 99, 111, 117, 182, 256, 268, 274, 280, 286, 292, 298, 304]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 1458 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 289/307 places, 245/245 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 284 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 284 transition count 240
Applied a total of 10 rules in 30 ms. Remains 284 /289 variables (removed 5) and now considering 240/245 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 240 rows 284 cols
[2025-05-30 18:22:09] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:22:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:22:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 464 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 691 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 284/307 places, 240/245 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2218 ms. Remains : 284/307 places, 240/245 transitions.
Support contains 128 out of 284 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 240 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 85 to 84
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (743 resets) in 1658 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 12/84 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (44 resets) in 145 ms. (273 steps per ms) remains 10/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (47 resets) in 181 ms. (219 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 125 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 144 ms. (275 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (44 resets) in 220 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (47 resets) in 147 ms. (270 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (45 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 209 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (46 resets) in 114 ms. (347 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 45 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp69 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 171/198 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 86/284 variables, 42/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 240/524 variables, 284/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 45/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 0/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/524 variables, 0/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 524/524 variables, and 387 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved in 561 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, State Equation: 284/284 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 170/181 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 103/284 variables, 50/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 240/524 variables, 284/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 45/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 6/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/524 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 524/524 variables, and 393 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved in 1165 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, State Equation: 284/284 constraints, ReadFeed: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1761ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
Fused 6 Parikh solutions to 4 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 35 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=35 )
Parikh walk visited 6 properties in 236 ms.
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 240 transitions.
Support contains 106 out of 284 places (down from 114) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 16 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 282 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 282 transition count 238
Applied a total of 4 rules in 13 ms. Remains 282 /284 variables (removed 2) and now considering 238/240 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 282 cols
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 264 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 56, 63, 98, 101, 106, 111, 222, 228, 240, 250]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 272 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 266/284 places, 238/240 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 262 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 262 transition count 234
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 261 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 261 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 260 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 260 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 259 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 259 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 258 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 258 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 257 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 257 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 256 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 256 transition count 228
Applied a total of 20 rules in 52 ms. Remains 256 /266 variables (removed 10) and now considering 228/238 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 256 cols
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:22:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 429 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 601 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 256/284 places, 228/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 939 ms. Remains : 256/284 places, 228/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1126447319159895878.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11531819744733659109.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1126447319159895878.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11531819744733659109.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9390984214178949145.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9390984214178949145.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9390984214178949145.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9390984214178949145.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9390984214178949145.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 108 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2086352946357489096.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7100997971367894837.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2086352946357489096.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7100997971367894837.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77913e+16,0.082136,6828,354,35,5426,297,470,6879,57,527,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(EG((((i7.u102.p244==0)||(i7.u102.p305==0)) * !(E(((i8.u37.p49==1)&&(i16.i0.u38.p128==1)) U ((i16.i0.u38.p70==1)&&(i14.i0.u62.p193==1)...283
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),(((i7.u102.p244==0)||(i7.u102.p305==0)) * !(E(((i8.u37.p49==1)&&(i16.i0.u38.p128==1)) U ((i16.i0...347
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t91, t121, i0.u0.t59, i0.u1.t57, i1.i0.u3.t53, i1.i1.u5.t49, i2.i0.u6.t47, i2.i0.u8.t43, i2.i...496
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
(forward)formula 0,1,0.596006,33452,1,0,73535,405,3348,76544,307,933,130610
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 284 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 244 transition count 200
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 244 transition count 178
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 222 transition count 178
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 220 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 220 transition count 176
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 198 transition count 154
Applied a total of 172 rules in 43 ms. Remains 198 /284 variables (removed 86) and now considering 154/240 (removed 86) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 198 cols
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 353 ms returned [5, 11, 16, 21, 26, 32, 37, 42, 52, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 145, 150, 155, 160, 168]
Discarding 30 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 356 ms to find 30 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 168/284 places, 154/240 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 168 transition count 120
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 134 transition count 120
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 134 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 118 transition count 104
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 113 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 113 transition count 99
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 112 transition count 98
Applied a total of 112 rules in 24 ms. Remains 112 /168 variables (removed 56) and now considering 98/154 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 112 cols
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 112/284 places, 98/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 694 ms. Remains : 112/284 places, 98/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15205294703988402785.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6210347008722919111.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15205294703988402785.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6210347008722919111.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.02653e+09,0.753007,33080,2,11034,5,99015,6,0,546,154713,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(!(A(((p110==1)||(p37==1)) U ((p12==1)||((p63==1)&&(p130==1)))))) + EF(((p281==0)||(p306==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(!(!((E(!(((p12==1)||((p63==1)&&(p130==1)))) U (!(((p110==1)||(p37==1))) * !(((p12==1)||((p63==1)&...264
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t23, t84, t97, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/int...179
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,25.4273,790184,1,0,790,4.77548e+06,237,479,3698,3.15564e+06,987
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 281 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 281 transition count 237
Applied a total of 6 rules in 18 ms. Remains 281 /284 variables (removed 3) and now considering 237/240 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 281 cols
[2025-05-30 18:23:11] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 299 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 95, 98, 101, 106, 111, 222, 228, 234, 240, 250, 280]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 306 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 260/284 places, 237/240 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 242 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 241 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 241 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 240 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 240 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 239 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 239 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 238 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 238 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 237 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 237 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 236 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 236 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 235 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 235 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 234 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 234 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 233 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 233 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 232 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 232 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 231 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 231 transition count 208
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 230 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 230 transition count 207
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 229 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 229 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 228 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 228 transition count 205
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 227 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 227 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 226 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 226 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 225 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 225 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 224 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 224 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 223 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 223 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 222 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 222 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 221 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 221 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 220 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 220 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 219 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 219 transition count 196
Applied a total of 82 rules in 101 ms. Remains 219 /260 variables (removed 41) and now considering 196/237 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 219 cols
[2025-05-30 18:23:11] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 289 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 219/284 places, 196/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 715 ms. Remains : 219/284 places, 196/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12592475522874906981.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8970235725430626891.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12592475522874906981.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8970235725430626891.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54755e+16,12.5953,359572,2,36343,5,966103,6,0,1074,2.36952e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(((EG((p38==0)) + AG((p2==0))) + (AF(((p1==1)&&(p170==1))) + (p69==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((EG((p38==0)) + !(E(TRUE U !((p2==0))))) + (!(EG(!(((p1==1)&&(p170==1))))) + (p69==0)))))))...165
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...298
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9219082555091764623.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9219082555091764623.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9219082555091764623.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9219082555091764623.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9219082555091764623.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14330396502030161030.gal : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1971378828810642868.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14330396502030161030.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1971378828810642868.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54755e+16,0.081383,7260,391,16,7016,177,399,8451,30,289,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(((EG((i15.u11.p38==0)) + AG((i17.u0.p2==0))) + (AF(((i17.u0.p1==1)&&(i13.u57.p170==1))) + (i8.i0.u20.p69==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((EG((i15.u11.p38==0)) + !(E(TRUE U !((i17.u0.p2==0))))) + (!(EG(!(((i17.u0.p1==1)&&(i13.u57...205
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t97, t121, i0.u4.t53, i1.u8.t45, i2.u10.t41, i3.u12.t37, i4.u14.t33, i5.u15.t31, i5.u17.t27, ...483
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 40 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 40 transitions
Performed 40 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 40
Iterating post reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 284 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 244 transition count 200
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 244 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 221 transition count 177
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 218 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 218 transition count 174
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 195 transition count 151
Applied a total of 178 rules in 20 ms. Remains 195 /284 variables (removed 89) and now considering 151/240 (removed 89) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 195 cols
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 236 ms returned [5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 41, 46, 51, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 143, 148, 153, 158, 166, 194]
Discarding 32 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 239 ms to find 32 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 163/284 places, 151/240 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 47 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 47 transitions
Performed 47 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 47
Iterating post reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 163 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 116 transition count 104
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 116 transition count 100
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 112 transition count 100
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 107 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 107 transition count 95
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 105 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 104 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 104 transition count 92
Applied a total of 118 rules in 12 ms. Remains 104 /163 variables (removed 59) and now considering 92/151 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 104 cols
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:24:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 186 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 104/284 places, 92/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 457 ms. Remains : 104/284 places, 92/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:24:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:24:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11914201301487935949.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11798129103250196752.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11914201301487935949.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11798129103250196752.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26668e+09,0.297775,16628,2,8456,5,48085,6,0,508,56490,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AF((p48==1)) * (p49==1)) * (p214==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!((p48==1)))) * (p49==1)) * (p214==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t11, t39, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,12.325,403520,1,0,643,2.29749e+06,213,357,3017,2.07224e+06,820
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 281 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 281 transition count 237
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 281 /284 variables (removed 3) and now considering 237/240 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 281 cols
[2025-05-30 18:24:25] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 256 ms returned [7, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 95, 98, 101, 222, 228, 240, 250, 280]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 257 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 265/284 places, 237/240 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 261 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 261 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 260 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 260 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 259 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 259 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 258 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 258 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 257 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 257 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 256 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 256 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 255 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 255 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 254 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 254 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 253 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 253 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 252 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 252 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 251 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 251 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 250 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 250 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 249 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 249 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 248 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 248 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 247 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 247 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 246 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 246 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 245 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 245 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 244 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 244 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 243 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 243 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 242 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 242 transition count 214
Applied a total of 46 rules in 49 ms. Remains 242 /265 variables (removed 23) and now considering 214/237 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 214 rows 242 cols
[2025-05-30 18:24:25] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:24:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:24:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 183 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 242/284 places, 214/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 622 ms. Remains : 242/284 places, 214/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:24:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 214 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:24:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15675274879163241435.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1485977236001239886.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15675274879163241435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1485977236001239886.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.66335e+16,15.8676,395248,2,63938,5,1.228e+06,6,0,1176,2.37798e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(((!(AF(((p244==1)&&(p305==1)))) + EX((E((p142==1) U (p203==1)) * EF((p61==1))))) + ((EF((p44==1)) * (p12!=1)) + (AX(((p74==1)&&(p230...384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((!(!(EG(!(((p244==1)&&(p305==1)))))) + EX((E((p142==1) U (p203==1)) * E(TRUE U (p61==1))))) ...507
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12507301283757574811.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12507301283757574811.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12507301283757574811.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12507301283757574811.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12507301283757574811.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7454889259441124755.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2507945567648565421.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7454889259441124755.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2507945567648565421.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.66335e+16,2.4114,91416,329,23,199888,212,498,233909,38,356,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(((!(AF(((i0.i1.u81.p244==1)&&(i20.u102.p305==1)))) + EX((E((i9.i1.u46.p142==1) U (i9.i1.u64.p203==1)) * EF((i4.u18.p61==1))))) + ((E...609
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((!(!(EG(!(((i0.i1.u81.p244==1)&&(i20.u102.p305==1)))))) + EX((E((i9.i1.u46.p142==1) U (i9.i1...752
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u2.t55, i0.i0.u4.t51, i1.u10.t41, i2.u12.t37, i3.u14.t33, i4.u18.t25, i5.u22.t17, i6.u2...527
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 284 transition count 202
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 246 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 245 transition count 201
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 245 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 223 transition count 179
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 220 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 220 transition count 176
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 198 transition count 154
Applied a total of 172 rules in 20 ms. Remains 198 /284 variables (removed 86) and now considering 154/240 (removed 86) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 198 cols
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 221 ms returned [6, 11, 16, 21, 26, 31, 36, 41, 46, 51, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 146, 151, 156, 161, 169, 197]
Discarding 33 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 222 ms to find 33 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 165/284 places, 154/240 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 55 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 55 transitions
Performed 55 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 55
Iterating post reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 165 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 110 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 109 transition count 98
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 109 transition count 97
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 108 transition count 97
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 103 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 103 transition count 92
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 102 transition count 91
Applied a total of 126 rules in 11 ms. Remains 102 /165 variables (removed 63) and now considering 91/154 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 102 cols
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 102/284 places, 91/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 421 ms. Remains : 102/284 places, 91/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9031729281974417793.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4708859993307555697.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9031729281974417793.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4708859993307555697.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76161e+09,0.778608,34360,2,21166,5,106736,6,0,501,149627,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E(AF((p82==1)) U (p3==1)) U (p156==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((p156==1))))) * !(E(!((p156==1)) U (!(E(!(EG(!((p82==1)))) U (p3==1))) * !((p156==1))))))] != F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t25, t78, t90, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inte...178
(forward)formula 0,0,27.7438,792944,1,0,1306,4.6829e+06,215,647,2974,3.48894e+06,1432
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 281 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 281 transition count 237
Applied a total of 6 rules in 14 ms. Remains 281 /284 variables (removed 3) and now considering 237/240 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 281 cols
[2025-05-30 18:25:54] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 283 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 49, 56, 63, 70, 95, 98, 101, 106, 111, 228, 234, 240, 250, 280]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 285 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 264/284 places, 237/240 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 260 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 260 transition count 233
Applied a total of 8 rules in 10 ms. Remains 260 /264 variables (removed 4) and now considering 233/237 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 260 cols
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 323 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 480 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 260/284 places, 233/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 789 ms. Remains : 260/284 places, 233/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 233 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability607397499521541695.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2815431696128165378.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability607397499521541695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2815431696128165378.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54869e+16,12.5798,359248,2,40877,5,1.18072e+06,6,0,1269,2.04596e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((p61==1) + EX(EG((((p42==1)&&(p189==1))||(p135==1)))))) + EF(((((AG(E(((p232==1)&&(p305==1)) U ((p48==1)&&(p271==1)))) * AX((p148==0...313
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((((!(E(TRUE U !(E(((p232==1)&&(p305==1)) U ((p48==1)&&(p271==1)))))) * !(EX(!((p148=...409
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...293
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5882323982691944177.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5882323982691944177.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5882323982691944177.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5882323982691944177.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5882323982691944177.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2746134819491682684.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7716054910052069352.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2746134819491682684.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7716054910052069352.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54869e+16,0.0941,8472,374,17,10110,202,500,10843,28,475,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((i6.u18.p61==1) + EX(EG((((i10.i1.u12.p42==1)&&(i15.i0.u66.p189==1))||(i8.i1.u42.p135==1)))))) + EF(((((AG(E(((i14.u84.p232==1)&&(i1...488
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((((!(E(TRUE U !(E(((i14.u84.p232==1)&&(i14.u62.p305==1)) U ((i4.u14.p48==1)&&(i4.u97...584
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, i0.u3.t53, i1.u5.t49, i2.i0.u2.t55, i2.i0.u4.t51, i2.i1.u6.t47, i2.i1.u8.t43, i3.u11.t37...497
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
(forward)formula 0,0,26.1282,627224,1,0,714659,202,3815,1.05302e+06,144,517,876479
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 281 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 281 transition count 237
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 281 /284 variables (removed 3) and now considering 237/240 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 281 cols
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 284 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 95, 98, 106, 111, 222, 228, 234, 240, 250, 280]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 285 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/284 places, 237/240 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 256 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 256 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 255 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 246 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 246 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 245 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 245 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 244 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 244 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 243 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 243 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 242 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 239 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 237 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 237 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 236 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 236 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 235 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 235 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 234 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 234 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 233 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 233 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 232 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 232 transition count 208
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 231 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 231 transition count 207
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 230 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 230 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 229 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 229 transition count 205
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 228 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 228 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 227 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 227 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 226 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 226 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 225 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 225 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 224 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 224 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 223 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 223 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 222 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 222 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 221 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 221 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 220 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 220 transition count 196
Applied a total of 82 rules in 92 ms. Remains 220 /261 variables (removed 41) and now considering 196/237 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 220 cols
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 169 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 278 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 220/284 places, 196/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 662 ms. Remains : 220/284 places, 196/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3497325387598459285.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10885356713660378128.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3497325387598459285.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10885356713660378128.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54755e+16,12.4717,353684,2,31579,5,953685,6,0,1076,2.33342e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(AX((p89==1)))) + AX(((p108==1)&&(p279==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(EX(!((p89==1))))))))) * !(((p108==1)&&(p279==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...298
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4823270820344697934.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4823270820344697934.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4823270820344697934.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4823270820344697934.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4823270820344697934.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12927383626577395557.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6667806655375844680.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12927383626577395557.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6667806655375844680.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54755e+16,0.205192,14764,345,16,24112,183,417,32446,32,313,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(AX((i17.u25.p89==1)))) + AX(((i9.i1.u32.p108==1)&&(i16.u64.p279==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(EX(!((i17.u25.p89==1))))))))) * !(((i9.i1.u32.p108==1)&&(i16.u64.p279==1))))] = FAL...157
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t121, i0.u2.t55, i0.u4.t51, i1.u5.t49, i2.u7.t45, i3.u9.t41, i4.u11.t37, i5.u13.t33, i6.u16.t...496
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.870749,38956,1,0,83587,214,2863,95534,157,482,135464
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 281 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 281 transition count 237
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 281 /284 variables (removed 3) and now considering 237/240 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 281 cols
[2025-05-30 18:27:23] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 289 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 95, 98, 101, 106, 111, 222, 228, 234, 240, 250, 280]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 290 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 260/284 places, 237/240 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 242 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 241 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 241 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 240 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 240 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 239 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 239 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 238 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 238 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 237 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 237 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 236 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 236 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 235 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 235 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 234 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 234 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 233 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 233 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 232 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 232 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 231 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 231 transition count 208
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 230 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 230 transition count 207
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 229 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 229 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 228 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 228 transition count 205
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 227 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 227 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 226 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 226 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 225 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 225 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 224 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 224 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 223 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 223 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 222 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 222 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 221 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 221 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 220 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 220 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 219 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 219 transition count 196
Applied a total of 82 rules in 89 ms. Remains 219 /260 variables (removed 41) and now considering 196/237 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 219 cols
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 219/284 places, 196/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 657 ms. Remains : 219/284 places, 196/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12164471448051482311.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15668932565892664630.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12164471448051482311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15668932565892664630.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54755e+16,12.4992,359540,2,36343,5,966103,6,0,1074,2.36952e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EF(EX((p73==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U EX((p73==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...298
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14798387196649922213.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14798387196649922213.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14798387196649922213.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14798387196649922213.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14798387196649922213.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15601584616692960209.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8776651718284140098.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15601584616692960209.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8776651718284140098.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54755e+16,0.227705,17252,360,16,33512,174,401,37738,30,289,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EF(EX((i17.u20.p73==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U EX((i17.u20.p73==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t121, i0.u0.t59, i0.u1.t57, i1.u3.t53, i2.u5.t49, i3.u6.t47, i3.u7.t45, i4.u8.t43, i4.u10.t39...486
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 281 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 281 transition count 237
Applied a total of 6 rules in 13 ms. Remains 281 /284 variables (removed 3) and now considering 237/240 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 281 cols
[2025-05-30 18:28:24] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 255 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 35, 49, 56, 63, 70, 95, 98, 101, 106, 111, 222, 228, 234, 240, 250, 280]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 256 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 262/284 places, 237/240 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 257 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 257 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 256 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 256 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 255 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 255 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 254 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 254 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 253 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 253 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 252 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 252 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 251 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 251 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 250 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 250 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 249 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 249 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 248 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 248 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 247 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 247 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 246 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 246 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 245 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 245 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 244 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 244 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 243 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 243 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 242 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 242 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 241 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 241 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 240 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 240 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 239 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 239 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 238 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 238 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 237 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 237 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 236 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 236 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 235 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 235 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 234 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 234 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 233 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 233 transition count 208
Applied a total of 58 rules in 60 ms. Remains 233 /262 variables (removed 29) and now considering 208/237 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 18:28:24] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 226 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 345 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 233/284 places, 208/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 674 ms. Remains : 233/284 places, 208/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 208 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3389579722502125535.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2335499804425530486.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3389579722502125535.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2335499804425530486.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54764e+16,13.0117,362012,2,49316,5,1.00843e+06,6,0,1138,2.29512e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(A((EX(EF((p107==1))) + ((p7==1)&&(p158==1))) U EX(((((p50==1)&&(p177==1))||((p42==1)&&(p213==1))) * AF((p41==1)))))) U E(AF(EG((((p38...197
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(!(EG(!(EG((((p38==1)&&(p81==1))&&(p231==1)))))) U (p95==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(!(EG(!(EG((((p38==1...589
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5512180158229596446.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5512180158229596446.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5512180158229596446.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5512180158229596446.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5512180158229596446.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 26 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17253630800964065371.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12785568080310932962.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17253630800964065371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12785568080310932962.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54764e+16,0.084854,8020,297,18,8366,202,460,12962,30,372,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(A((EX(EF((i17.u31.p107==1))) + ((i10.i2.u51.p7==1)&&(i11.i0.u52.p158==1))) U EX(((((i17.u14.p50==1)&&(i13.i1.u60.p177==1))||((i8.i1.u...305
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(!(EG(!(EG((((i12.u10.p38==1)&&(i18.u23.p81==1))&&(i19.u96.p231==1)))))) U (i3.i0.u27.p95==1))...853
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, t121, i0.i0.u2.t55, i0.i0.u4.t51, i0.i1.u6.t47, i0.i1.u8.t43, i1.u3.t53, i2.u5.t49, i3.i...503
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 281 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 281 transition count 237
Applied a total of 6 rules in 7 ms. Remains 281 /284 variables (removed 3) and now considering 237/240 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 281 cols
[2025-05-30 18:29:25] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 277 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 95, 98, 101, 106, 111, 222, 228, 234, 240, 250, 280]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 278 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/284 places, 237/240 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 256 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 256 transition count 232
Applied a total of 10 rules in 7 ms. Remains 256 /261 variables (removed 5) and now considering 232/237 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 232 rows 256 cols
[2025-05-30 18:29:25] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:29:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:29:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 307 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 451 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 256/284 places, 232/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 743 ms. Remains : 256/284 places, 232/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:29:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 232 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:29:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9052514160209270593.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18398857641012875177.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9052514160209270593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18398857641012875177.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.5478e+16,16.8701,477592,2,40043,5,1.25191e+06,6,0,1256,3.10886e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((((A(((p71==1)&&(p180==1)) U ((p7==1)&&(p184==1))) * (p116==0)) * (p59==0)) + (p37==1)) + ((p149==0)||(p23==1)))) + EX(((p74==1)&&(p...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU(((FwdU((Init * !(EX(((p74==1)&&(p230==1))))),TRUE) * !(((p149==0)||(p23==1)))) * !((p37==1))),!(((p7==...620
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...293
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6001204376709968692.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6001204376709968692.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6001204376709968692.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6001204376709968692.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6001204376709968692.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 25 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3343480565435993545.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7071057956792649696.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3343480565435993545.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7071057956792649696.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.5478e+16,1.24674,43680,302,15,80805,153,456,134539,24,249,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((((A(((i7.i1.u20.p71==1)&&(i7.i1.u60.p180==1)) U ((i8.i0.u36.p7==1)&&(i8.i0.u61.p184==1))) * (i16.i1.u34.p116==0)) * (i7.i0.u16.p59=...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU(((FwdU((Init * !(EX(((i16.i1.u21.p74==1)&&(i16.i0.u80.p230==1))))),TRUE) * !(((i4.i1.u47.p149==0)||(i6...925
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, i0.u7.t45, i1.u2.t55, i1.u4.t51, i2.i0.u9.t41, i2.i1.u11.t37, i6.i0.u6.t47, i6.i0.u8.t43...510
(forward)formula 0,0,1.84326,43680,1,0,80805,153,2794,134539,100,249,98544
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 281 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 281 transition count 237
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 281 /284 variables (removed 3) and now considering 237/240 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 281 cols
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 285 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 63, 70, 95, 98, 101, 106, 111, 222, 228, 234, 250, 280]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 286 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 262/284 places, 237/240 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 258 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 258 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 257 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 257 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 256 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 256 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 255 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 255 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 254 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 254 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 253 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 253 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 252 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 252 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 251 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 251 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 250 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 250 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 249 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 249 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 248 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 248 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 247 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 247 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 246 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 246 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 245 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 245 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 244 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 244 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 243 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 243 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 242 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 242 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 241 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 241 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 240 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 240 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 239 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 239 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 238 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 238 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 237 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 237 transition count 212
Applied a total of 50 rules in 61 ms. Remains 237 /262 variables (removed 25) and now considering 212/237 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 237 cols
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 227 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 369 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 237/284 places, 212/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 723 ms. Remains : 237/284 places, 212/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 212 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5180246433580991234.gal : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10096434383150361808.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5180246433580991234.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10096434383150361808.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.66334e+16,17.7395,487788,2,105563,5,1.44839e+06,6,0,1160,2.89757e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2331148346019947049.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2331148346019947049.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2331148346019947049.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2331148346019947049.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2331148346019947049.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 25 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2305931845806488588.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10147326598752967860.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2305931845806488588.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10147326598752967860.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.66334e+16,0.115208,9636,343,15,12299,178,466,17627,24,430,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AX(((i11.i1.u54.p56==1)&&(i12.u55.p165==1)))) U EG(!((!(EF(((i16.i1.u79.p250==1)&&(i15.u62.p305==1)))) * EX((i13.i0.u63.p205==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!(((i11.i1.u54.p56==1)&&(i12.u55.p165==1))))))),!((!(E(TRUE U ((i16.i1.u79.p250==1)&&(i15...211
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t178, t193, i0.i0.u3.t53, i0.i1.u5.t49, i1.u6.t47, i1.u7.t45, i2.i0.u12.t35, i2.i0.u14.t31, i...519
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 0,1,14.2863,347684,1,0,671299,178,3369,906549,110,468,522090
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 283 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 283 transition count 239
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 283 /284 variables (removed 1) and now considering 239/240 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 283 cols
[2025-05-30 18:30:43] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 275 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 70, 95, 98, 101, 106, 111, 222, 234, 240, 250]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 276 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 265/284 places, 239/240 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 261 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 261 transition count 235
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 260 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 260 transition count 234
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 259 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 259 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 258 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 258 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 257 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 257 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 256 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 256 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 255 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 255 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 254 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 254 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 253 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 253 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 252 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 252 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 251 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 251 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 250 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 250 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 249 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 249 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 248 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 248 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 247 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 247 transition count 221
Applied a total of 36 rules in 37 ms. Remains 247 /265 variables (removed 18) and now considering 221/239 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 247 cols
[2025-05-30 18:30:43] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:30:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 189 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 321 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 247/284 places, 221/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 640 ms. Remains : 247/284 places, 221/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 221 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8765940956127951197.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1076432100723964622.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8765940956127951197.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1076432100723964622.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18180283527213311271.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18180283527213311271.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18180283527213311271.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18180283527213311271.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18180283527213311271.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 20 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2311541342918071380.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10076938161261338951.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2311541342918071380.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10076938161261338951.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.89475e+16,0.080235,7296,384,36,6709,612,454,7697,53,1205,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(!(E(AF(((i5.i1.u103.p281==1)&&(i5.i1.u103.p306==1))) U !(((i5.i1.u103.p238==1)&&(i5.i1.u103.p305==1)))))) + EX(AF((((i8.i1.u44.p136=...369
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY((Init * !((!(EG(!(!(E(!(EG(!(((i5.i1.u103.p281==1)&&(i5.i1.u103.p306==1))))) U !(((i5.i1.u103.p238==...1007
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u5.t49, i1.u9.t41, i2.i0.u14.t31, i2.i0.u16.t27, i2.i1.u10.t39, i2.i1.u12.t35, i3.i0.u15.t...534
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 284/284 places, 240/240 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 284 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 252 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 250 transition count 206
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 250 transition count 184
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 228 transition count 184
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 226 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 226 transition count 182
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 207 transition count 163
Applied a total of 154 rules in 23 ms. Remains 207 /284 variables (removed 77) and now considering 163/240 (removed 77) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 207 cols
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 186 ms returned [11, 16, 22, 27, 32, 43, 49, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 154, 159, 169]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 187 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 182/284 places, 163/240 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 182 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 160 transition count 141
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 160 transition count 123
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 142 transition count 123
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 139 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 139 transition count 120
Applied a total of 86 rules in 9 ms. Remains 139 /182 variables (removed 43) and now considering 120/163 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 139 cols
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 139/284 places, 120/240 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 441 ms. Remains : 139/284 places, 120/240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9776220659313862992.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:31:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13559271057013798724.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9776220659313862992.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13559271057013798724.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.44892e+10,8.26795,226588,2,88363,5,641161,6,0,670,1.08356e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF((((E(((p27==1)&&(p253==1)) U (p200==1)) + AG(((p49==1)&&(p164==1)))) + (((p70==1)&&(p131==1))||(((p60==1)&&(p228==1))&&((p262==1)&&(...450
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((((E(((p27==1)&&(p253==1)) U (p200==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !(((p49==1)&&(p164==1)))))) + (((p70...644
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t10, t14, t21, t28, t32, t106, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destro...196
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8798611963537781452.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8798611963537781452.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8798611963537781452.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8798611963537781452.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8798611963537781452.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2352988674511780280.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11433803255740264073.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2352988674511780280.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11433803255740264073.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.44892e+10,0.053648,6192,219,34,3976,507,463,6000,54,1591,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF((((E(((i2.u8.p27==1)&&(i2.u48.p253==1)) U (i10.i1.u38.p200==1)) + AG(((i10.i0.u15.p49==1)&&(i10.i0.u31.p164==1)))) + (((i10.i0.u29.p...736
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((((E(((i2.u8.p27==1)&&(i2.u48.p253==1)) U (i10.i1.u38.p200==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !(((i10.i0.u...990
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t32, t106, i1.i0.u1.t28, i2.u8.t21, i4.i2.u14.t14, i5.i1.u23.t4, i9.i0.u18.t10, Intersection...241
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6424929358825828451.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6424929358825828451.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6424929358825828451.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6424929358825828451.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6424929358825828451.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1668394741543693433.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14537246141412270063.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1668394741543693433.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14537246141412270063.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.35847e+16,0.212722,13756,430,117,18970,2205,657,26140,98,9511,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(((EG((i12.i1.u10.p38==0)) + AG((i14.i0.u0.p2==0))) + (AF(((i14.i0.u0.p1==1)&&(i11.i0.u65.p170==1))) + (i17.i0.u20.p69==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((EG((i12.i1.u10.p38==0)) + !(E(TRUE U !((i14.i0.u0.p2==0))))) + (!(EG(!(((i14.i0.u0.p1==1)&...218
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t220, i0.i0.u3.t53, i0.i1.u5.t49, i1.i0.u9.t41, i2.u13.t33, i3.i1.u18.t25, i4.u19.t23, i4.u21...530
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-30 18:35:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:35:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:35:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:35:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 55 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:35:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:35:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3874548645300138595.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:35:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11878046217951289655.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3874548645300138595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11878046217951289655.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.35847e+16,3.96626,145108,1640,403,128349,22023,525,642160,338,101893,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(((EG((u16.p38==0)) + AG((u1.p2==0))) + (AF(((u1.p1==1)&&(u61.p170==1))) + (u29.p69==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((EG((u16.p38==0)) + !(E(TRUE U !((u1.p2==0))))) + (!(EG(!(((u1.p1==1)&&(u61.p170==1))))) + ...183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t97, t220, u1.t59, u2.t57, u4.t55, u5.t53, u7.t51, u8.t49, u10.t47, u11.t45, u13.t43, u14.t41...383
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,102.85,2200596,1,0,3.47231e+06,104506,1668,9.66091e+06,1032,564451,5765527
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(AF(((!(AF(((u64.p244==1)&&(u75.p305==1)))) + EX((E((u61.p142==1) U (u62.p203==1)) * EF((u26.p61==1))))) + ((EF((u19.p44==1)) * (u5.p12!...478
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((!(!(EG(!(((u64.p244==1)&&(u75.p305==1)))))) + EX((E((u61.p142==1) U (u62.p203==1)) * E(TRUE...609
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,1,232.34,2671764,1,0,4.04986e+06,217406,1206,1.32887e+07,877,966881,3435447
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(AX(EF(EX((u31.p73==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U EX((u31.p73==1)))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 2,1,267.79,2684692,1,0,4.90618e+06,217406,1930,1.32887e+07,1032,966881,8945241
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(!(A((EX(EF((u51.p107==1))) + ((u3.p7==1)&&(u61.p158==1))) U EX(((((u22.p50==1)&&(u61.p177==1))||((u18.p42==1)&&(u62.p213==1))) * AF((u1...244
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(!(EG(!(EG((((u16.p38==1)&&(u35.p81==1))&&(u62.p231==1)))))) U (u43.p95==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(!(E...708
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:59:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:59:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 240 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:59:11] [INFO ] Transformed 284 places.
[2025-05-30 18:59:11] [INFO ] Transformed 240 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-30 18:59:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15099297247178948091.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:59:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5519882671438583417.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15099297247178948091.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5519882671438583417.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.35847e+16,363.121,7371284,2,430253,5,1.49334e+07,6,0,1348,4.88381e+07,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(A((EX(EF((p107==1))) + ((p7==1)&&(p158==1))) U EX(((((p50==1)&&(p177==1))||((p42==1)&&(p213==1))) * AF((p41==1)))))) U E(AF(EG((((p38...197
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(!(EG(!(EG((((p38==1)&&(p81==1))&&(p231==1)))))) U (p95==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(!(EG(!(EG((((p38==1...589
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...293

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-12a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-12a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500538"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-12a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-12a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;