Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729500537.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-12a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500537
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 126K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748629286640

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-12a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 18:21:27] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 18:21:27] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 18:21:28] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 79 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:28] [INFO ] Transformed 307 places.
[2025-05-30 18:21:28] [INFO ] Transformed 305 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:21:28] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 18:21:28] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 307 places and 305 transitions and 980 arcs in 466 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 60 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 60 transitions.
Support contains 106 out of 307 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 307/307 places, 245/245 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 23 ms. Remains 307 /307 variables (removed 0) and now considering 245/245 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 307 cols
[2025-05-30 18:21:28] [INFO ] Computed 76 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 3251 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 35, 42, 49, 56, 93, 96, 99, 102, 108, 111, 114, 117, 120, 182, 244, 256, 262, 274, 292, 298, 304, 306]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 3291 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 282/307 places, 245/245 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 278 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 278 transition count 241
Applied a total of 8 rules in 31 ms. Remains 278 /282 variables (removed 4) and now considering 241/245 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 278 cols
[2025-05-30 18:21:31] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:21:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:21:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 598 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 766 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 278/307 places, 241/245 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4127 ms. Remains : 278/307 places, 241/245 transitions.
Support contains 106 out of 278 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 18:21:32] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-30 18:21:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 18:21:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
Support contains 103 out of 278 places (down from 106) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (751 resets) in 1975 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 9/71 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (43 resets) in 274 ms. (145 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 176 ms. (226 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (42 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 129 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 140 ms. (283 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
[2025-05-30 18:21:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 18:21:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 170/182 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 96/278 variables, 44/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/519 variables, 278/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/519 variables, 23/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/519 variables, 0/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/519 variables, 0/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 519/519 variables, and 352 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 472 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 278/278 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 170/182 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 96/278 variables, 44/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/519 variables, 278/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/519 variables, 23/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/519 variables, 4/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/519 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/519 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 519/519 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved in 667 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 51/51 constraints, State Equation: 278/278 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1166ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 57 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=57 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 48 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 12 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 210 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 70, 77, 80, 83, 215, 221, 231, 245, 255, 261]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 211 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 262/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 256 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 256 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 255 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 255 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 254 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 254 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 253 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 253 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 252 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 252 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 251 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 251 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 250 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 250 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 249 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 249 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 248 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 248 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 247 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 247 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 246 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 246 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 245 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 245 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 244 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 244 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 243 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 243 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 242 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 242 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 241 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 241 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 240 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 240 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 239 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 239 transition count 215
Applied a total of 46 rules in 119 ms. Remains 239 /262 variables (removed 23) and now considering 215/238 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 239 cols
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 214 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 335 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 239/278 places, 215/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 677 ms. Remains : 239/278 places, 215/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 215 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17940602100150620053.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:21:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5762906849724649059.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17940602100150620053.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5762906849724649059.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54768e+16,17.7367,458432,2,43474,5,1.23064e+06,6,0,1171,2.977e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(A(AX(((p105==0)||(p260==1))) U A(((p139==0)||(p33==1)) U ((p296==0)||(p64==1)))) U (p305==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p305==1))) * !((p305==1))),!(!((E(!(((p296==0)||(p64==1))) U (!(((p139=...872
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 199/0/16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15125562575046379126.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15125562575046379126.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15125562575046379126.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15125562575046379126.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15125562575046379126.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:22:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:22:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:22:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:22:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5622478136092659662.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17889476405480228578.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5622478136092659662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17889476405480228578.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54768e+16,1.88372,77528,363,17,166411,192,410,230572,32,309,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(A(AX(((i9.u31.p105==0)||(i19.u86.p260==1))) U A(((i11.i0.i0.u43.p139==0)||(i4.u9.p33==1)) U ((i19.u97.p296==0)||(i8.u18.p64==1)))) U...176
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((i19.u100.p305==1))) * !((i19.u100.p305==1))),!(!((E(!(((i19.u97.p296==0...1225
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,0,4.20937,99928,1,0,200308,192,1798,243823,117,335,192416
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 14 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:22:10] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 347 ms returned [25, 56, 70, 77, 80, 83, 94, 215, 221, 231, 245, 255, 261]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 349 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 262/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 256 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 256 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 255 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 255 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 254 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 254 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 253 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 253 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 252 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 252 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 251 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 251 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 250 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 250 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 249 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 249 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 248 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 248 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 247 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 247 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 246 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 246 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 245 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 245 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 244 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 244 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 243 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 243 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 242 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 242 transition count 218
Applied a total of 40 rules in 55 ms. Remains 242 /262 variables (removed 20) and now considering 218/238 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 242 cols
[2025-05-30 18:22:10] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:22:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 202 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 349 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 242/278 places, 218/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 767 ms. Remains : 242/278 places, 218/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14196146882761321051.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16967205468414409318.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14196146882761321051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16967205468414409318.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54771e+16,15.0169,414052,2,44608,5,1.11923e+06,6,0,1186,2.6839e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG((EX((p64==1)) + !(AG((p198==0))))) + (AG(EF((p119==1))) * EG((((p219==1) * AX((p224==1))) + ((p176==1)&&((p70==0)||(p62==1))))))) U...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((p228==1))))) * !(E(!((p228==1)) U (!((EG((EX((p64==1)) + !(!(E(TRUE U !((p198==0))))))) + (!(E...297
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12878561110910388774.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12878561110910388774.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12878561110910388774.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12878561110910388774.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12878561110910388774.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8165473721998767582.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:22:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6221570237378437448.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8165473721998767582.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6221570237378437448.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54771e+16,0.804569,38912,407,18,74601,186,424,120722,31,310,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG((EX((i5.u18.p64==1)) + !(AG((i13.u65.p198==0))))) + (AG(EF((i20.u35.p119==1))) * EG((((i14.u73.p219==1) * AX((i4.u76.p224==1))) + (...232
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((i6.u77.p228==1))))) * !(E(!((i6.u77.p228==1)) U (!((EG((EX((i5.u18.p64==1)) + !(!(E(TRUE U !((...377
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t193, i0.u0.t59, i0.u1.t57, i1.u3.t53, i2.u5.t49, i3.u2.t55, i3.u4.t51, i3.u6.t47, i3.u8.t43,...479
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 10 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:23:11] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 245 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 70, 77, 80, 215, 221, 231, 245, 255, 261]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 246 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 263/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 257 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 257 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 256 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 256 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 255 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 255 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 254 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 254 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 253 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 253 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 252 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 252 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 251 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 251 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 250 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 250 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 249 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 249 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 248 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 248 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 247 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 247 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 246 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 246 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 245 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 245 transition count 220
Applied a total of 36 rules in 40 ms. Remains 245 /263 variables (removed 18) and now considering 220/238 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 245 cols
[2025-05-30 18:23:11] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:23:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 225 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 351 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 245/278 places, 220/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 648 ms. Remains : 245/278 places, 220/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16424137032444719565.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17335480134032463926.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16424137032444719565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17335480134032463926.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54772e+16,14.2005,420444,2,37031,5,1.1133e+06,6,0,1198,2.72153e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((p134==1) U ((AG((((p90!=1) + AF((p260==1))) + AX(((p105==0)||(p94==1))))) + AX(FALSE)) + EG(AX(((p97==0)||(p180==1)))))) + AF(EG(((p1...176
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E((p134==1) U ((!(E(TRUE U !((((p90!=1) + !(EG(!((p260==1))))) + !(EX(!(((p105==0)||(p94==1)))))...260
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12871983474401934676.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12871983474401934676.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12871983474401934676.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12871983474401934676.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12871983474401934676.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15031889112577943183.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:23:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14654044679221457118.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15031889112577943183.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14654044679221457118.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54772e+16,22.6367,689964,332,20,1.31236e+06,208,477,2.5292e+06,38,334,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((i5.i0.u41.p134==1) U ((AG((((i20.i1.u80.p90!=1) + AF((i14.u86.p260==1))) + AX(((i17.u90.p105==0)||(i0.u27.p94==1))))) + AX(FALSE)) + ...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E((i5.i0.u41.p134==1) U ((!(E(TRUE U !((((i20.i1.u80.p90!=1) + !(EG(!((i14.u86.p260==1))))) + !(...342
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t169, t193, i0.u6.t47, i0.u7.t45, i1.u11.t37, i2.i0.u16.t27, i2.i0.u18.t23, i2.i1.u20.t19, i2...511
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 13 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 247 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 70, 77, 80, 83, 94, 215, 221, 231, 245, 255, 261]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 249 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 239 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 237 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 237 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 236 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 236 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 235 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 235 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 234 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 234 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 233 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 233 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 232 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 232 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 231 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 231 transition count 208
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 230 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 230 transition count 207
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 229 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 229 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 228 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 228 transition count 205
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 227 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 227 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 226 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 226 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 225 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 225 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 224 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 224 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 223 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 223 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 222 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 222 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 221 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 221 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 220 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 220 transition count 197
Applied a total of 82 rules in 90 ms. Remains 220 /261 variables (removed 41) and now considering 197/238 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 220 cols
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 250 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 220/278 places, 197/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 602 ms. Remains : 220/278 places, 197/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17322327967150261561.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3208396249560299992.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17322327967150261561.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3208396249560299992.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54756e+16,14.7743,418596,2,34631,5,1.10571e+06,6,0,1079,2.74649e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG(((p160==0)&&(p258==1))) + AG(AF((p71==1)))) + (EG(AG((p254==1))) + (AX(FALSE) * EG(((p179==0) * E(((p29==0)||(p113==1)) U (p219==1))...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(((p160==0)&&(p258==1))))) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p71==1)))))))))) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE...399
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12291113693592851888.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12291113693592851888.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12291113693592851888.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12291113693592851888.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12291113693592851888.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:24:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:24:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:24:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:24:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:24:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4024336812585332642.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:24:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3926223878133464356.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4024336812585332642.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3926223878133464356.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54756e+16,0.221648,14568,400,16,26303,192,402,29888,30,328,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG(((i11.i0.u53.p160==0)&&(i2.u75.p258==1))) + AG(AF((i14.u20.p71==1)))) + (EG(AG((i21.u74.p254==1))) + (AX(FALSE) * EG(((i14.u61.p179=...228
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(((i11.i0.u53.p160==0)&&(i2.u75.p258==1))))) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((i14.u20.p71==1...501
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u5.t49, i1.u6.t47, i1.u7.t45, i2.u9.t41, i3.u12.t35, i3.u13.t33, i4.u14.t31, i4.u16.t27, i...496
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 14 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 233 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 70, 77, 80, 83, 94, 215, 221, 231, 245, 255, 261]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 235 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 239 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 237 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 237 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 236 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 236 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 235 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 235 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 234 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 234 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 233 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 233 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 232 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 232 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 231 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 231 transition count 208
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 230 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 230 transition count 207
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 229 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 229 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 228 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 228 transition count 205
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 227 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 227 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 226 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 226 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 225 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 225 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 224 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 224 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 223 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 223 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 222 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 222 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 221 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 221 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 220 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 220 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 219 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 219 transition count 196
Applied a total of 84 rules in 92 ms. Remains 219 /261 variables (removed 42) and now considering 196/238 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 219 cols
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 280 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 219/278 places, 196/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 622 ms. Remains : 219/278 places, 196/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1886137196980466408.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14287502154741064199.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1886137196980466408.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14287502154741064199.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54755e+16,12.797,359460,2,36343,5,966103,6,0,1074,2.36952e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * TRUE)] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,13.3126,359460,1,0,6,966103,7,1,1819,2.36952e+06,1
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 95 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 95 transitions
Performed 95 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 95
Iterating post reduction 0 with 103 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 269 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 174 transition count 145
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 174 transition count 136
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 156 transition count 136
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 156 transition count 128
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 148 transition count 128
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 244 place count 145 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 145 transition count 125
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 114 transition count 94
Applied a total of 309 rules in 35 ms. Remains 114 /278 variables (removed 164) and now considering 94/241 (removed 147) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 114 cols
[2025-05-30 18:25:27] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [79, 83, 89, 96, 101, 105]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 101 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/278 places, 94/241 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 140 ms. Remains : 108/278 places, 94/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4540575322553422053.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12794545382795207551.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4540575322553422053.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12794545382795207551.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06032e+10,0.037294,5364,2,630,5,6467,6,0,529,6746,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p173==1) U EG(!(EG(((A(((p85==0)||(p252==1)) U (p12==1)) * ((p115==0)||(p283==1))) * (p88==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(p173==1)),!(EG(((!((E(!((p12==1)) U (!(((p85==0)||(p252==1))) * !((p12==1)))) + EG(!((p12==1)))...208
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 92/0/2
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t23, t88, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,4.1139,149816,1,0,854,891686,234,474,3132,926296,1061
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:25:31] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 70, 77, 80, 83, 94, 215, 221, 231, 255, 261]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 207 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 262/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 257 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 257 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 256 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 256 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 255 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 255 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 254 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 254 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 253 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 253 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 252 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 252 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 251 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 251 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 250 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 250 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 249 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 249 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 248 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 248 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 247 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 247 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 246 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 246 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 245 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 245 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 244 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 244 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 243 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 243 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 242 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 242 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 241 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 241 transition count 217
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 240 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 240 transition count 216
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 239 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 239 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 238 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 238 transition count 214
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 237 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 237 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 236 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 236 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 235 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 235 transition count 211
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 234 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 234 transition count 210
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 233 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 233 transition count 209
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 232 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 232 transition count 208
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 231 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 231 transition count 207
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 230 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 230 transition count 206
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 229 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 229 transition count 205
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 228 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 228 transition count 204
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 227 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 227 transition count 203
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 226 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 226 transition count 202
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 225 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 225 transition count 201
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 224 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 224 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 223 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 223 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 222 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 222 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 221 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 221 transition count 197
Applied a total of 82 rules in 104 ms. Remains 221 /262 variables (removed 41) and now considering 197/238 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 221 cols
[2025-05-30 18:25:31] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:25:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 221/278 places, 197/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 592 ms. Remains : 221/278 places, 197/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:25:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10378790482515072518.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:25:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18256219511459288880.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10378790482515072518.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18256219511459288880.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.66324e+16,14.1578,413732,2,27127,5,1.10651e+06,6,0,1083,2.6837e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AF((E(((p167==0)||(p36==1)) U (p268==1)) + EX((p229==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!((E(((p167==0)||(p36==1)) U (p268==1)) + EX((p229==1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...298
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13266692265917511048.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13266692265917511048.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13266692265917511048.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13266692265917511048.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13266692265917511048.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3934059551746488753.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17495321230413772951.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3934059551746488753.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17495321230413772951.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.66324e+16,1.45196,57844,377,13,97009,165,440,183630,22,281,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AF((E(((i12.i1.u55.p167==0)||(i18.i0.u10.p36==1)) U (i18.i1.u77.p268==1)) + EX((i16.u66.p229==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!((E(((i12.i1.u55.p167==0)||(i18.i0.u10.p36==1)) U (i18.i1.u77.p268==1)) + EX((i16.u66....182
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t121, i0.u1.t57, i1.u3.t53, i2.u9.t41, i3.i0.u11.t37, i3.i1.u13.t33, i4.u14.t31, i4.u16.t27, ...504
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,5.03999,125044,1,0,253719,165,2985,275290,105,281,317096
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 55 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 55 transitions
Performed 55 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 55
Iterating post reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 278 transition count 186
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 223 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 221 transition count 184
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 221 transition count 167
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 204 transition count 167
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 202 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 202 transition count 165
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 173 transition count 136
Applied a total of 210 rules in 36 ms. Remains 173 /278 variables (removed 105) and now considering 136/241 (removed 105) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 173 cols
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned [18, 40, 45, 50, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 122, 127, 136, 147, 162]
Discarding 24 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 184 ms to find 24 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/278 places, 136/241 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 149 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 121 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 118 transition count 105
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 118 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 116 transition count 103
Applied a total of 66 rules in 13 ms. Remains 116 /149 variables (removed 33) and now considering 103/136 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 116 cols
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 116/278 places, 103/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 392 ms. Remains : 116/278 places, 103/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13811460870498424542.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7000894854002913980.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13811460870498424542.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7000894854002913980.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.41241e+09,0.79204,34292,2,17529,5,119203,6,0,569,140869,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(A(((p248==0)||(p285==1)) U A(((p6==0)||(p278==1)) U ((p208==0)||(p162==1)))) U ((p251==0)||(p33==1))) U !(AG(((AF(((p203==0)||(p175==...187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,E(!((E(!(!((E(!(((p208==0)||(p162==1))) U (!(((p6==0)||(p278==1))) * !(((p208==0)||(p162=...588
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t25, t99, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...176
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,6.18197,186180,1,0,350,906573,260,177,3806,584082,511
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 95 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 95 transitions
Performed 95 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 95
Iterating post reduction 0 with 103 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 269 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 174 transition count 145
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 174 transition count 133
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 150 transition count 133
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 150 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 138 transition count 121
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 261 place count 135 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 135 transition count 118
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 103 transition count 86
Applied a total of 328 rules in 12 ms. Remains 103 /278 variables (removed 175) and now considering 86/241 (removed 155) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 103 cols
[2025-05-30 18:26:13] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [72, 75, 80, 87, 92, 95]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/278 places, 86/241 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 97 /97 variables (removed 0) and now considering 86/86 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 64 ms. Remains : 97/278 places, 86/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4491505433088125395.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12464332069247312396.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4491505433088125395.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12464332069247312396.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.22084e+08,0.030424,4920,2,570,5,4552,6,0,477,4468,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((p174==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((p174==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.095512,7992,1,0,8,22287,19,5,2398,10097,10
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 12 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 70, 77, 80, 83, 94, 215, 221, 231, 245, 255, 261]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 231 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Applied a total of 12 rules in 8 ms. Remains 255 /261 variables (removed 6) and now considering 232/238 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 232 rows 255 cols
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 201 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 334 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 255/278 places, 232/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 586 ms. Remains : 255/278 places, 232/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 232 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10412358444283350394.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13782433761780504610.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10412358444283350394.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13782433761780504610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.5478e+16,16.3745,455460,2,39512,5,1.19869e+06,6,0,1254,2.99432e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX(EG((p110==1)))) + AG(AX(EX((E(((p184==0)||(p235==1)) U (p135==1)) * (p4==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(EX(EG((p110==1)))))))),TRUE)) * !(EX((E(((p184==0)||(p235==1)) U (p135==1)) * (p4==1)...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...293
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4003719368269558473.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4003719368269558473.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4003719368269558473.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4003719368269558473.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4003719368269558473.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 25 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1577486516963682396.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:26:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1440906952110971519.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1577486516963682396.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1440906952110971519.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.5478e+16,1.08964,47136,334,16,88187,213,474,166311,30,389,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX(EG((i4.u32.p110==1)))) + AG(AX(EX((E(((i12.i0.u61.p184==0)||(i15.u82.p235==1)) U (i7.i0.u41.p135==1)) * (i15.u1.p4==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(EX(EG((i4.u32.p110==1)))))))),TRUE)) * !(EX((E(((i12.i0.u61.p184==0)||(i15.u82.p235==...211
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t121, i0.i0.u5.t49, i0.i1.u3.t53, i1.u7.t45, i2.i0.u14.t31, i2.i0.u16.t27, i2.i1.u10.t39, i2....512
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:27:14] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 70, 77, 83, 94, 215, 221, 245, 261]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 207 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 264/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 260 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 260 transition count 234
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 259 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 259 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 258 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 258 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 257 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 257 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 256 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 256 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 255 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 255 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 254 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 254 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 253 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 253 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 252 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 252 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 251 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 251 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 250 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 250 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 249 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 249 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 248 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 248 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 247 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 247 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 246 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 246 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 245 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 245 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 244 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 244 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 243 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 243 transition count 217
Applied a total of 42 rules in 43 ms. Remains 243 /264 variables (removed 21) and now considering 217/238 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 243 cols
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 188 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 307 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 243/278 places, 217/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 562 ms. Remains : 243/278 places, 217/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 217 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5630303978161590555.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5843846231089829734.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5630303978161590555.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5843846231089829734.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77905e+16,12.3811,349876,2,60459,5,1.04806e+06,6,0,1189,2.10803e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AF(!(((p280==0)||(p10==1)))) + (A((p37==1) U ((p250==0)||(p139==1))) * ((EX(AX((p64==1))) + E(((p230==0)&&(p13==1)) U (p228!=1))) + AF...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(!(((p280==0)||(p10==1)))))) + (!((E(!(((p250==0)||(p139==1))) U (!((p37==1)) * !(((p250=...380
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18103310400948826863.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18103310400948826863.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18103310400948826863.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18103310400948826863.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18103310400948826863.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8780321345496103034.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:27:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4458780341532494511.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8780321345496103034.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4458780341532494511.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77905e+16,0.112199,8884,366,17,10737,198,480,14544,32,402,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AF(!(((i16.i1.u92.p280==0)||(i1.i0.u2.p10==1)))) + (A((i11.i0.u10.p37==1) U ((i1.i1.u79.p250==0)||(i8.i1.u44.p139==1))) * ((EX(AX((i5....385
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(!(((i16.i1.u92.p280==0)||(i1.i0.u2.p10==1)))))) + (!((E(!(((i1.i1.u79.p250==0)||(i8.i1.u...566
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t193, i0.u1.t57, i1.i0.u2.t55, i1.i0.u4.t51, i2.u9.t41, i3.u11.t37, i4.i0.u19.t21, i4.i1.u21....530
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
(forward)formula 0,0,18.0519,470836,1,0,861616,224,3318,824308,148,521,880409
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 277 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 277 transition count 240
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 277 /278 variables (removed 1) and now considering 240/241 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 240 rows 277 cols
[2025-05-30 18:28:03] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 217 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 70, 77, 80, 83, 94, 215, 221, 231, 246, 256]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 218 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 264/278 places, 240/241 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 259 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 259 transition count 235
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 258 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 258 transition count 234
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 257 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 257 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 256 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 256 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 255 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 255 transition count 231
Applied a total of 18 rules in 37 ms. Remains 255 /264 variables (removed 9) and now considering 231/240 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 231 rows 255 cols
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 246 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 386 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 255/278 places, 231/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 657 ms. Remains : 255/278 places, 231/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 231 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4868443843400213736.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2408384121681124379.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4868443843400213736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2408384121681124379.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.89482e+16,11.9342,345548,2,30961,5,1.00687e+06,6,0,1253,2.19391e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EF(AX(((p273==0)&&(p62==1)))) * ((p251==0)||(p106==1))) + ((p286==0) * (EG(EF(((p216==0)||(p188==1)))) + ((p157==0)&&(p293==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((EY(Init) * ((p251==0)||(p106==1))),TRUE) * !(EX(!(((p273==0)&&(p62==1))))))] != FALSE + ([FwdG((EY(Init...278
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...298
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17004314017670205174.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17004314017670205174.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17004314017670205174.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17004314017670205174.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17004314017670205174.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11106159904567722350.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12425581132191540798.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11106159904567722350.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12425581132191540798.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.89482e+16,1.68556,66384,346,18,119324,266,412,236249,33,561,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EF(AX(((i18.u94.p273==0)&&(i5.u17.p62==1)))) * ((i18.u106.p251==0)||(i4.u31.p106==1))) + ((i5.u99.p286==0) * (EG(EF(((i14.u75.p216==...225
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((EY(Init) * ((i18.u106.p251==0)||(i4.u31.p106==1))),TRUE) * !(EX(!(((i18.u94.p273==0)&&(i5.u17.p62==1)))...356
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t89, i0.u0.t59, i0.u1.t57, i1.u3.t53, i1.u5.t49, i2.u6.t47, i2.u8.t43, i2.u2.t55, i2.u4.t51, ...476
(forward)formula 0,1,2.67653,66384,1,0,119324,266,2789,236249,150,642,186712
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 276 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 276 transition count 239
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 276 /278 variables (removed 2) and now considering 239/241 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 276 cols
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 193 ms returned [56, 63, 70, 77, 80, 83, 215, 232, 246, 256, 262]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 194 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 265/278 places, 239/241 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 260 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 260 transition count 234
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 259 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 259 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 258 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 258 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 257 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 257 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 256 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 256 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 255 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 255 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 254 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 254 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 253 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 253 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 252 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 252 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 251 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 251 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 250 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 250 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 249 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 249 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 248 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 248 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 247 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 247 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 246 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 246 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 245 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 245 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 244 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 244 transition count 218
Applied a total of 42 rules in 40 ms. Remains 244 /265 variables (removed 21) and now considering 218/239 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 244 cols
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 192 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 310 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 244/278 places, 218/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 553 ms. Remains : 244/278 places, 218/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality431873033814136619.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:28:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10945581669221289646.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality431873033814136619.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10945581669221289646.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77906e+16,10.6468,303304,2,50008,5,905670,6,0,1192,1.80325e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((EX((AX((p109==1)) + ((p88==1)&&((p238==0)||(p254==1))))) + EG(EF((p105==0)))) + (!(EG((p28==1))) + E((((p46==0)||(p147==1))||((p82=...266
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(((EX((!(EX(!((p109==1)))) + ((p88==1)&&((p238==0)||(p254==1))))) + EG(E(TRUE U (p105==0)))) +...334
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1195481000949795529.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1195481000949795529.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1195481000949795529.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1195481000949795529.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1195481000949795529.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4514742704344465868.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2717669715126987428.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4514742704344465868.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2717669715126987428.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77906e+16,0.228238,15300,460,23,26072,277,430,40181,38,517,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((EX((AX((i8.u32.p109==1)) + ((i17.u25.p88==1)&&((i16.u77.p238==0)||(i20.u85.p254==1))))) + EG(EF((i4.u91.p105==0)))) + (!(EG((i11.u5...399
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(((EX((!(EX(!((i8.u32.p109==1)))) + ((i17.u25.p88==1)&&((i16.u77.p238==0)||(i20.u85.p254==1)))...467
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t173, i0.u7.t45, i1.u2.t55, i1.u4.t51, i1.u6.t47, i1.u8.t43, i2.u9.t41, i3.u12.t35, i3.u14.t3...480
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 13 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:29:37] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 203 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 70, 77, 80, 83, 94, 215, 221, 231, 245, 255, 261]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 204 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 255 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 255 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 254 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 254 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 253 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 253 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 252 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 251 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 251 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 250 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 250 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 249 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 248 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 247 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 247 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 246 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 246 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 245 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 245 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 244 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 243 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 243 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 242 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 218
Applied a total of 40 rules in 39 ms. Remains 241 /261 variables (removed 20) and now considering 218/238 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 241 cols
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 272 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 241/278 places, 218/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 528 ms. Remains : 241/278 places, 218/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10077218865399957213.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:29:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2594884104653609338.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10077218865399957213.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2594884104653609338.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54771e+16,14.0348,390816,2,29525,5,1.03155e+06,6,0,1184,2.5886e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX((A(((p150==1)||(p59==0)) U A((p198==0) U ((p283==0)||(p156==1)))) * EF(AX((p180==1))))) + ((EG(((p258==1)&&(((p266==0)||(p104==0))...219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!((!((E(!(!((E(!(((p283==0)||(p156==1))) U (!((p198==0)) * !(((p283==0)||(p156==1))))) + EG(!...626
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t27, t29, t31, t33, t35, t37, t39, t41, t43, t45, t47, t49...299
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5630412012823043743.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5630412012823043743.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5630412012823043743.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5630412012823043743.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5630412012823043743.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1974592506264746649.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4001571797861958944.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1974592506264746649.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4001571797861958944.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54771e+16,0.124929,10048,407,16,13160,181,471,18840,30,418,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX((A(((i11.i0.u50.p150==1)||(i4.i1.u17.p59==0)) U A((i9.i0.u63.p198==0) U ((i5.u93.p283==0)||(i11.i1.u52.p156==1)))) * EF(AX((i6.u62...346
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!((!((E(!(!((E(!(((i5.u93.p283==0)||(i11.i1.u52.p156==1))) U (!((i9.i0.u63.p198==0)) * !(((i5...917
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t171, i0.i0.u5.t49, i0.i1.u3.t53, i1.i0.u6.t47, i1.i0.u9.t43, i1.i1.u2.t55, i1.i1.u4.t51, i2....526
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,16.5588,574416,1,0,1.08638e+06,181,3325,2.3002e+06,140,418,754739
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 278/278 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 275 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 275 transition count 238
Applied a total of 6 rules in 15 ms. Remains 275 /278 variables (removed 3) and now considering 238/241 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 275 cols
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Computed 51 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 203 ms returned [25, 56, 63, 77, 80, 83, 94, 215, 221, 231, 245, 255, 261]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 204 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 262/278 places, 238/241 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 256 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 256 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 255 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 255 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 254 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 254 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 253 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 253 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 252 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 252 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 251 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 251 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 250 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 250 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 249 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 249 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 248 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 248 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 247 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 247 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 246 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 246 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 245 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 245 transition count 221
Applied a total of 34 rules in 40 ms. Remains 245 /262 variables (removed 17) and now considering 221/238 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 245 cols
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 216 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 345 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 245/278 places, 221/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 605 ms. Remains : 245/278 places, 221/241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 221 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11128279082637518672.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11574291816690378174.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11128279082637518672.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11574291816690378174.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.54773e+16,15.306,422992,2,46738,5,1.15593e+06,6,0,1201,2.75377e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(AG(((p77==0)||(p202==1)))) * ((p133==0) + (EG(((p101==0)||(p290==1))) * (AX(FALSE) + (p258==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p77==0)||(p202==1)))))))] = FALSE * ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p133==0))) ...277
(forward)formula 0,0,15.3589,422992,1,0,10,1.15593e+06,11,5,1620,2.75377e+06,3
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2820872976907327631.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2820872976907327631.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2820872976907327631.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2820872976907327631.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2820872976907327631.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2002292222578650538.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:30:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9373240895295748905.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2002292222578650538.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9373240895295748905.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.47416e+16,0.510303,26324,446,26,47615,398,582,71843,51,967,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG((EX((i2.u18.p64==1)) + !(AG((i11.i0.u68.p198==0))))) + (AG(EF((i10.i2.u37.p119==1))) * EG((((i13.u77.p219==1) * AX((i0.u79.p224==1)...250
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((i20.i0.u81.p228==1))))) * !(E(!((i20.i0.u81.p228==1)) U (!((EG((EX((i2.u18.p64==1)) + !(!(E(TR...403
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t221, i0.u9.t41, i1.u13.t33, i2.u18.t23, i2.u19.t21, i3.u20.t19, i3.u22.t15, i4.u21.t17, i7.i...496
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-30 18:35:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:35:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:35:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:35:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:35:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:35:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4427273310416152500.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:35:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12544846243270282791.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4427273310416152500.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12544846243270282791.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.47416e+16,10.9604,348788,1678,404,297006,10354,483,1.73445e+06,328,51983,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG((EX((u28.p64==1)) + !(AG((u62.p198==0))))) + (AG(EF((u59.p119==1))) * EG((((u62.p219==1) * AX((u62.p224==1))) + ((u61.p176==1)&&((u...202
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((u62.p228==1))))) * !(E(!((u62.p228==1)) U (!((EG((EX((u28.p64==1)) + !(!(E(TRUE U !((u62.p198=...341
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t221, u1.t59, u2.t57, u4.t55, u5.t53, u7.t51, u8.t49, u10.t47, u11.t45, u13.t43, u14.t41, u16...387
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,190.681,4852836,1,0,8.36725e+06,76764,1757,1.77079e+07,1117,452256,2498797
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (E((u61.p134==1) U ((AG((((u40.p90!=1) + AF((u67.p260==1))) + AX(((u50.p105==0)||(u43.p94==1))))) + AX(FALSE)) + EG(AX(((u45.p97==0)||(u6...212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E((u61.p134==1) U ((!(E(TRUE U !((((u40.p90!=1) + !(EG(!((u67.p260==1))))) + !(EX(!(((u50.p105==...296
(forward)formula 1,1,207.12,4852964,1,0,8.36725e+06,82850,2269,1.77079e+07,1175,452256,4731784
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: ((AG(((u61.p160==0)&&(u67.p258==1))) + AG(AF((u31.p71==1)))) + (EG(AG((u66.p254==1))) + (AX(FALSE) * EG(((u61.p179==0) * E(((u13.p29==0)|...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(((u61.p160==0)&&(u67.p258==1))))) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((u31.p71==1)))))))))) * !...447
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,0,389.218,6893612,1,0,1.12654e+07,133217,1863,2.972e+07,1121,763483,2388887
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(EX(EG((u53.p110==1)))) + AG(AX(EX((E(((u62.p184==0)||(u63.p235==1)) U (u61.p135==1)) * (u2.p4==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(EX(EG((u53.p110==1)))))))),TRUE)) * !(EX((E(((u62.p184==0)||(u63.p235==1)) U (u61.p13...187
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 3,1,457.206,6893612,1,0,1.12654e+07,133217,2264,2.972e+07,1212,763483,22174703
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(!(((EX((AX((u53.p109==1)) + ((u39.p88==1)&&((u63.p238==0)||(u66.p254==1))))) + EG(EF((u50.p105==0)))) + (!(EG((u12.p28==1))) + E((((u20...328
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(((EX((!(EX(!((u53.p109==1)))) + ((u39.p88==1)&&((u63.p238==0)||(u66.p254==1))))) + EG(E(TRUE ...396
(forward)formula 4,1,507.608,7153196,1,0,1.2382e+07,133217,2592,3.06504e+07,1224,822421,29422236
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-12a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1370193 ms.

BK_STOP 1748630658051

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-12a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-12a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500537"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-12a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-12a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;