Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729500532.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500532
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 636K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 147K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748628281229

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-06b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 18:04:42] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 18:04:42] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 18:04:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 100 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:42] [INFO ] Transformed 574 places.
[2025-05-30 18:04:42] [INFO ] Transformed 572 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:42] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 18:04:42] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 574 places and 572 transitions and 1334 arcs in 197 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 37 out of 574 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 574/574 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 73 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 73 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 501 transition count 499
Iterating global reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 501 transition count 499
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 501 transition count 487
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 472 transition count 458
Iterating global reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 472 transition count 458
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 470 transition count 456
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 470 transition count 456
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 222 place count 468 transition count 454
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 468 transition count 454
Applied a total of 224 rules in 161 ms. Remains 468 /574 variables (removed 106) and now considering 454/572 (removed 118) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 454 rows 468 cols
[2025-05-30 18:04:43] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 366 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:04:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 338 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 735 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 453 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/468 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 2425 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 161 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 152 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 141 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 146 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 102 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 100 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 113 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 109 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 468/922 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/468 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 453/453 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/468 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 73/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 145 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 105 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 89 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 91 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 20/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 102 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 117 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 13/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 468/922 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/468 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/453 constraints, Known Traps: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60129ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 453 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60142ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 468/574 places, 454/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61057 ms. Remains : 468/574 places, 454/572 transitions.
Support contains 37 out of 468 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 18:05:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 454 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (136 resets) in 1945 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 9/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (12 resets) in 177 ms. (224 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (12 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (10 resets) in 206 ms. (193 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (11 resets) in 72 ms. (548 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (11 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-05-30 18:05:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 190/198 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 239/437 variables, 33/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 31/468 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 454/922 variables, 468/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/922 variables, 0/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/922 variables, 0/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 922/922 variables, and 508 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 539 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 468/468 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 190/198 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 239/437 variables, 33/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/437 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 31/468 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 109 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 107 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 108 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 107 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 94 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 16/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 454/922 variables, 468/528 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/922 variables, 7/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 108 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 108 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 108 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/922 variables, 5/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/922 variables, 0/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/922 variables, 0/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 922/922 variables, and 540 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 4195 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 468/468 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4749ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 22494 steps, including 89 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 34 ms. (steps per millisecond=661 )
Parikh walk visited 7 properties in 726 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 127 stabilizing places and 127 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(G(p0))||G(p1)) U p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 161 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 161 transitions
Performed 161 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 161
Iterating post reduction 0 with 161 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 467 transition count 292
Reduce places removed 161 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 179 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 306 transition count 274
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 294 transition count 274
Performed 54 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 54 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 294 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 460 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 471 place count 229 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 482 place count 229 transition count 209
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 482 place count 229 transition count 203
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 494 place count 223 transition count 203
Performed 85 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 12 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 85 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 170 rules applied. Total rules applied 664 place count 138 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 665 place count 137 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 671 place count 133 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 673 place count 131 transition count 103
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 673 place count 131 transition count 101
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 677 place count 129 transition count 101
Applied a total of 677 rules in 79 ms. Remains 129 /468 variables (removed 339) and now considering 101/454 (removed 353) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 129 cols
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [55, 75, 95, 101, 107, 113, 119, 123, 128]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/468 places, 101/454 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 113 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 113 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 112 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 112 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 111 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 111 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 110 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 110 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 109 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 109 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 108 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 108 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 107 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 107 transition count 88
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 106 transition count 87
Applied a total of 28 rules in 21 ms. Remains 106 /120 variables (removed 14) and now considering 87/101 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 106 cols
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned [45, 47, 49]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/468 places, 87/454 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 103 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 100 transition count 84
Applied a total of 6 rules in 7 ms. Remains 100 /103 variables (removed 3) and now considering 84/87 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 100 cols
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:05:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 214 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 100/468 places, 84/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 631 ms. Remains : 100/468 places, 84/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 236 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 38 steps with 0 reset in 10 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-00 finished in 948 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(((G(p0) U p1)&&F(p2)))&&F(p3))))'
Support contains 4 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 461 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 461 transition count 447
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 458 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 458 transition count 444
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 456 transition count 442
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 456 transition count 442
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 455 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 455 transition count 441
Applied a total of 26 rules in 81 ms. Remains 455 /468 variables (removed 13) and now considering 441/454 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 441 rows 455 cols
[2025-05-30 18:05:52] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:05:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 284 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 439 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 440 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:05:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/455 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 149 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 146 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 143 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 138 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 89 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 93 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 112 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 139 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 105 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 19/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 127 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 115 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 111 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 455/896 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/455 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 440/440 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/455 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 79/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 102 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 100 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 20/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 18/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 455/896 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/455 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/440 constraints, Known Traps: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60074ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60076ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 455/468 places, 441/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60598 ms. Remains : 455/468 places, 441/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 338 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p3), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 415 reset in 284 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 416 reset in 212 ms.
Computed a total of 116 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Computed a total of 116 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Detected a total of 116/455 stabilizing places and 116/441 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/4 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p3 p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 25 factoid took 260 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 19 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
RANDOM walk for 982 steps (0 resets) in 12 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p3 p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 25 factoid took 304 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
[2025-05-30 18:06:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 39 positive place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:06:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 39 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 802 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 39 positive place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 39 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:06:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 418 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:06:56] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 440/624/440 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 25 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Added : 410 causal constraints over 82 iterations in 3744 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Support contains 1 out of 455 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 455/455 places, 441/441 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 156 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 156 transitions
Performed 156 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 156
Iterating post reduction 0 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 454 transition count 284
Reduce places removed 156 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 298 transition count 266
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 286 transition count 266
Performed 56 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 56 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 286 transition count 210
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 454 place count 230 transition count 210
Performed 90 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 12 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 90 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 90 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 180 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 140 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 635 place count 139 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 653 place count 127 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 659 place count 121 transition count 101
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 659 place count 121 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 671 place count 115 transition count 95
Applied a total of 671 rules in 33 ms. Remains 115 /455 variables (removed 340) and now considering 95/441 (removed 346) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 115 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned [47, 67, 87, 97, 101, 105, 109, 114]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/455 places, 95/441 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 101 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 101 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 100 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 100 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 99 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 99 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 98 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 98 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 97 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 97 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 96 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 96 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 95 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 95 transition count 83
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 93 transition count 81
Applied a total of 28 rules in 15 ms. Remains 93 /107 variables (removed 14) and now considering 81/95 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/455 places, 81/441 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 265 ms. Remains : 93/455 places, 81/441 transitions.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Detected a total of 4/93 stabilizing places and 4/81 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p2), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p2)), (X p2), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 177 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
RANDOM walk for 29 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p2), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p2)), (X p2), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 226 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 39 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 20 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 27 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 1 Read/Feed constraints in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 50/85/50 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Added : 11 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 27 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 87 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7425 reset in 203 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2157 steps with 168 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 4 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-01 finished in 69125 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&X(G(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 459 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 459 transition count 445
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 455 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 455 transition count 441
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 452 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 451 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 451 transition count 437
Applied a total of 34 rules in 45 ms. Remains 451 /468 variables (removed 17) and now considering 437/454 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 437 rows 451 cols
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 295 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 443 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 436 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/451 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 146 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 151 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 139 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 96 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 451/888 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/451 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 436/436 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/451 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 84/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 158 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 103 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 19/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 93 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 12/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 102 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 451/888 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/451 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/436 constraints, Known Traps: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60070ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 451/468 places, 437/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60561 ms. Remains : 451/468 places, 437/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[(NOT p1), true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-03
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-03 finished in 60701 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0 U p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 158 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 158 transitions
Performed 158 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 158
Iterating post reduction 0 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 467 transition count 295
Reduce places removed 158 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 1 with 175 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 309 transition count 278
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 298 transition count 276
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 296 transition count 276
Performed 55 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 55 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 296 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 241 transition count 221
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 469 place count 230 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 480 place count 230 transition count 210
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 480 place count 230 transition count 204
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 492 place count 224 transition count 204
Performed 87 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 12 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 87 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 666 place count 137 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 667 place count 136 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 683 place count 125 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 688 place count 120 transition count 99
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 688 place count 120 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 700 place count 114 transition count 93
Applied a total of 700 rules in 39 ms. Remains 114 /468 variables (removed 354) and now considering 93/454 (removed 361) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 114 cols
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [45, 67, 87, 91, 95, 99, 104, 108, 113]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/468 places, 93/454 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 98 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 98 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 97 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 97 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 96 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 96 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 95 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 94 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 94 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 93 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 93 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 92 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 92 transition count 80
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 91 transition count 79
Applied a total of 28 rules in 9 ms. Remains 91 /105 variables (removed 14) and now considering 79/93 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 91 cols
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/468 places, 79/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 270 ms. Remains : 91/468 places, 79/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 22 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-04 finished in 377 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 457 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 457 transition count 443
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 452 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 448 transition count 434
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 446 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 446 transition count 432
Applied a total of 44 rules in 47 ms. Remains 446 /468 variables (removed 22) and now considering 432/454 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 446 cols
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 273 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 430 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 147 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 134 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 10/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 81 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/878 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 45/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 100 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 12/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/878 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/431 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60076ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 446/468 places, 432/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60556 ms. Remains : 446/468 places, 432/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 134 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 206 steps with 0 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-05 finished in 60717 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0&&((p1 U p2)||F(!p0))) U p3))'
Support contains 4 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 158 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 158 transitions
Performed 158 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 158
Iterating post reduction 0 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 467 transition count 295
Reduce places removed 158 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 176 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 309 transition count 277
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 297 transition count 276
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 296 transition count 276
Performed 57 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 57 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 296 transition count 219
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 239 transition count 219
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 470 place count 231 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 478 place count 231 transition count 211
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 478 place count 231 transition count 207
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 227 transition count 207
Performed 87 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 12 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 87 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 660 place count 140 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 661 place count 139 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 679 place count 127 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 685 place count 121 transition count 101
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 685 place count 121 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 697 place count 115 transition count 95
Applied a total of 697 rules in 33 ms. Remains 115 /468 variables (removed 353) and now considering 95/454 (removed 359) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 115 cols
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [47, 67, 87, 91, 95, 99, 103, 114]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/468 places, 95/454 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 101 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 101 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 100 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 100 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 99 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 99 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 98 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 98 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 97 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 97 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 96 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 96 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 95 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 95 transition count 83
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 93 transition count 81
Applied a total of 28 rules in 11 ms. Remains 93 /107 variables (removed 14) and now considering 81/95 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/468 places, 81/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 281 ms. Remains : 93/468 places, 81/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[(NOT p3), true, p0, (AND p0 (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 175 steps with 17 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-06 finished in 435 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 163 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 163 transitions
Performed 163 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 163
Iterating post reduction 0 with 163 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 467 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 163 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 181 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 304 transition count 272
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 292 transition count 272
Performed 54 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 54 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 292 transition count 218
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 238 transition count 218
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 475 place count 227 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 227 transition count 207
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 227 transition count 201
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 498 place count 221 transition count 201
Performed 83 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 12 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 83 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 166 rules applied. Total rules applied 664 place count 138 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 665 place count 137 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 683 place count 125 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 689 place count 119 transition count 99
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 689 place count 119 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 701 place count 113 transition count 93
Applied a total of 701 rules in 27 ms. Remains 113 /468 variables (removed 355) and now considering 93/454 (removed 361) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 113 cols
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [45, 65, 85, 89, 93, 97, 101, 112]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/468 places, 93/454 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 99 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 99 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 98 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 98 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 97 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 97 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 96 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 96 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 95 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 95 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 94 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 94 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 93 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 93 transition count 81
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 91 transition count 79
Applied a total of 28 rules in 8 ms. Remains 91 /105 variables (removed 14) and now considering 79/93 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 91 cols
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/468 places, 79/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 256 ms. Remains : 91/468 places, 79/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 41 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-07 finished in 347 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0||G(p1)||(p1&&F(G(p2))&&F(p0))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 161 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 161 transitions
Performed 161 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 161
Iterating post reduction 0 with 161 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 467 transition count 292
Reduce places removed 161 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 179 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 306 transition count 274
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 294 transition count 273
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 293 transition count 273
Performed 53 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 53 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 293 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 53 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 106 rules applied. Total rules applied 460 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 471 place count 229 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 4 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 482 place count 229 transition count 209
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 482 place count 229 transition count 204
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 492 place count 224 transition count 204
Performed 87 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 12 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 87 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 87 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 666 place count 137 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 667 place count 136 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 684 place count 124 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 689 place count 119 transition count 99
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 689 place count 119 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 701 place count 113 transition count 93
Applied a total of 701 rules in 35 ms. Remains 113 /468 variables (removed 355) and now considering 93/454 (removed 361) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 113 cols
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [44, 65, 85, 89, 93, 99, 103, 107, 112]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/468 places, 93/454 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 97 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 97 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 96 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 95 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 95 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 94 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 94 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 93 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 93 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 92 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 92 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 91 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 91 transition count 80
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 90 transition count 79
Applied a total of 28 rules in 8 ms. Remains 90 /104 variables (removed 14) and now considering 79/93 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 90 cols
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:09:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/468 places, 79/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 248 ms. Remains : 90/468 places, 79/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3809 reset in 235 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3808 reset in 280 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 345 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 1841 steps (66 resets) in 17 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 453 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 2 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:09:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 48 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/90 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/169 variables, 90/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/169 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 169/169 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1248 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/90 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/169 variables, 90/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 48/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/169 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 169/169 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved in 1294 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2546ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 48 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2548ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2698 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 79/79 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 370 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 2148 steps (75 resets) in 17 ms. (119 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 481 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3799 reset in 146 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3772 reset in 155 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin4975899824358861164
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 79 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 79 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 79 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Built C files in 21ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin4975899824358861164
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4975899824358861164;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 287 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4975899824358861164;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 50 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin4975899824358861164;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased7703557428360277243.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 2 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 79/79 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 89 transition count 78
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 89 /90 variables (removed 1) and now considering 78/79 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 89 cols
[2025-05-30 18:09:25] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:09:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 47 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/89 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 78/167 variables, 89/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 167/167 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 1220 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/89 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 78/167 variables, 89/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 47/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 167/167 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 1387 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2613ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2613ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/90 places, 78/79 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2767 ms. Remains : 89/90 places, 78/79 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1725618310756213040
[2025-05-30 18:09:27] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 78 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:27] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 18:09:27] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 78 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:27] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 18:09:27] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 78 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:27] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 18:09:27] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1725618310756213040
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1725618310756213040;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 190 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1725618310756213040;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 34 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1725618310756213040;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased17808670651841277286.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL1555316065021826358.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL15474204115379427527.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL1555316065021826358.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut18151575877911807096.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL15474204115379427527.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...319
Loading property file /tmp/LTL15474204115379427527.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut18151575877911807096.hoa
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1536 deadlock states
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
26 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.291753,28124,1,0,89,68948,34,86,2116,101712,210
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE HOA DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-09 finished in 39697 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(((p0&&F(G(p1))) U X(X(X(p2)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 458 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 458 transition count 444
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 454 transition count 440
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 454 transition count 440
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 450 transition count 436
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 448 transition count 434
Applied a total of 40 rules in 49 ms. Remains 448 /468 variables (removed 20) and now considering 434/454 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 434 rows 448 cols
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 303 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 456 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 433 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 142 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 125 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 107 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 448/882 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 86/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 93 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 92 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 132 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 13/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 2/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 95 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 1)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 timeout
0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 448/882 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/433 constraints, Known Traps: 185/185 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60065ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 448/468 places, 434/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60576 ms. Remains : 448/468 places, 434/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 765 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 5 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-10 finished in 61373 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0&&X(X(p1))) U (((p2 U p3)||X(p3)) U p4)))'
Support contains 6 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 458 transition count 444
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 458 transition count 444
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 453 transition count 439
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 453 transition count 439
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 450 transition count 436
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 449 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 449 transition count 435
Applied a total of 38 rules in 44 ms. Remains 449 /468 variables (removed 19) and now considering 435/454 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 435 rows 449 cols
[2025-05-30 18:10:44] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:10:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 285 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 436 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 434 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:10:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/449 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 162 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 142 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 140 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 5/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 11/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 93 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 449/884 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/449 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 434/434 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/449 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 56/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 11/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 101 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 91 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 6/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 98 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 449/884 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/449 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/434 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60055ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 449/468 places, 435/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60537 ms. Remains : 449/468 places, 435/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 544 ms :[(NOT p4), (NOT p3), (NOT p4), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p4)), (NOT p3), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p4)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p4)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 165 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-11 finished in 61109 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 163 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 163 transitions
Performed 163 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 163
Iterating post reduction 0 with 163 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 467 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 163 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 181 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 304 transition count 272
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 292 transition count 272
Performed 54 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 54 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 292 transition count 218
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 238 transition count 218
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 475 place count 227 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 227 transition count 207
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 227 transition count 201
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 498 place count 221 transition count 201
Performed 85 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 12 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 85 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 170 rules applied. Total rules applied 668 place count 136 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 669 place count 135 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 687 place count 123 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 693 place count 117 transition count 97
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 693 place count 117 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 705 place count 111 transition count 91
Applied a total of 705 rules in 39 ms. Remains 111 /468 variables (removed 357) and now considering 91/454 (removed 363) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 111 cols
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [43, 63, 83, 87, 96, 100, 104, 110]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/468 places, 91/454 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 97 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 97 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 96 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 96 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 95 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 95 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 94 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 94 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 93 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 93 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 92 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 92 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 91 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 91 transition count 79
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 89 transition count 77
Applied a total of 28 rules in 6 ms. Remains 89 /103 variables (removed 14) and now considering 77/91 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 89 cols
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/468 places, 77/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 244 ms. Remains : 89/468 places, 77/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 37 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-13 finished in 335 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 457 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 457 transition count 443
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 452 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 448 transition count 434
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 446 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 446 transition count 432
Applied a total of 44 rules in 52 ms. Remains 446 /468 variables (removed 22) and now considering 432/454 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 446 cols
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 264 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 418 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:11:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 147 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 10/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 96 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/878 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 45/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 12/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 111 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/878 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/431 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60052ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 446/468 places, 432/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60523 ms. Remains : 446/468 places, 432/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-14 finished in 60638 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0)||G(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 468 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 468/468 places, 454/454 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 457 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 457 transition count 443
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 452 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 448 transition count 434
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 446 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 446 transition count 432
Applied a total of 44 rules in 44 ms. Remains 446 /468 variables (removed 22) and now considering 432/454 (removed 22) transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 154 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 307 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 499 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 170 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 147 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 161 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 175 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 136 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 168 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 146 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 140 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 160 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 129 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 159 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 10/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 113 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/878 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 45/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 152 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 149 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 12/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/878 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/431 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 446/468 places, 432/454 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60598 ms. Remains : 446/468 places, 432/454 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 128 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 430 reset in 208 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 427 reset in 207 ms.
Computed a total of 108 stabilizing places and 108 stable transitions
Computed a total of 108 stabilizing places and 108 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 105 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 212 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (136 resets) in 223 ms. (178 steps per ms) remains 3/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 276 ms. (144 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 183 ms. (217 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 127 ms. (312 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-05-30 18:13:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 137/141 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 273/414 variables, 35/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem apf2 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 32/446 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 432/878 variables, 446/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/878 variables, 0/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/878 variables, 0/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 878/878 variables, and 487 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 356 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 446/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 137/141 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 273/414 variables, 35/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 2/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/414 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/446 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 432/878 variables, 446/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/878 variables, 2/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/878 variables, 0/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/878 variables, 0/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 878/878 variables, and 493 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 891 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 446/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1254ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 198 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=66 )
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 2 ms.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (G (OR (NOT p0) p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 297 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 13 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 7 states, 17 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 317 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 301 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false, false]
Support contains 4 out of 446 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 446/446 places, 432/432 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 156 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 156 transitions
Performed 156 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 156
Iterating post reduction 0 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 445 transition count 275
Reduce places removed 156 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 289 transition count 257
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 277 transition count 257
Performed 54 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 54 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 277 transition count 203
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 223 transition count 203
Performed 86 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 12 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 86 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 622 place count 137 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 623 place count 136 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 641 place count 124 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 647 place count 118 transition count 98
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 647 place count 118 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 659 place count 112 transition count 92
Applied a total of 659 rules in 22 ms. Remains 112 /446 variables (removed 334) and now considering 92/432 (removed 340) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 112 cols
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [44, 64, 84, 88, 92, 101, 105, 111]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/446 places, 92/432 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 98 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 97 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 97 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 96 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 95 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 95 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 94 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 94 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 93 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 93 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 92 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 92 transition count 80
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 90 transition count 78
Applied a total of 28 rules in 7 ms. Remains 90 /104 variables (removed 14) and now considering 78/92 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 90 cols
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/446 places, 78/432 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 222 ms. Remains : 90/446 places, 78/432 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 293 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 17 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 7 states, 18 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 300 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1456 resets) in 80 ms. (493 steps per ms) remains 1/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (80 resets) in 25 ms. (1538 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem apf4 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/168 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 25 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/20 constraints, State Equation: 0/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (G (OR p1 (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 548 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 18 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 7 states, 17 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 306 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 301 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 294 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false, false]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 103 steps with 3 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLFireability-15 finished in 66298 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 550831 ms.

BK_STOP 1748628833335

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-06b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500532"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-06b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-06b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;