Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729500531.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500531
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 636K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 147K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748627882988

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-06b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 100 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Transformed 574 places.
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Transformed 572 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 574 places and 572 transitions and 1334 arcs in 199 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 11 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 22 out of 574 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 574/574 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 75 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 75 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 499 transition count 497
Iterating global reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 499 transition count 497
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 499 transition count 486
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 193 place count 467 transition count 454
Iterating global reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 467 transition count 454
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 462 transition count 449
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 462 transition count 449
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 459 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 459 transition count 446
Applied a total of 241 rules in 170 ms. Remains 459 /574 variables (removed 115) and now considering 446/572 (removed 126) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 446 rows 459 cols
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 24 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 351 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 339 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 722 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 445 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/459 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 411 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 277 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 302 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 146 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 139 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 146 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 151 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 98 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 112 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 118 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 459/905 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/459 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 445/445 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/459 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 80/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 131 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 94 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 80 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 459/905 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/459 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/445 constraints, Known Traps: 176/176 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60146ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 459/574 places, 446/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61059 ms. Remains : 459/574 places, 446/572 transitions.
Support contains 22 out of 459 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 446 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (136 resets) in 910 ms. (43 steps per ms) remains 1/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 167 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 78/80 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 346/426 variables, 37/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 33/459 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 446/905 variables, 459/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/905 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/905 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 905/905 variables, and 499 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 215 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 459/459 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 78/80 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 346/426 variables, 37/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 33/459 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 6/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 446/905 variables, 459/507 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/905 variables, 1/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/905 variables, 0/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/905 variables, 0/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 905/905 variables, and 508 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1081 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 459/459 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1303ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 233 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=46 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 9 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 112 stabilizing places and 112 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||G(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 459 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 459/459 places, 446/446 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 451 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 451 transition count 438
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 451 transition count 437
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 448 transition count 434
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 447 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 447 transition count 433
Applied a total of 25 rules in 35 ms. Remains 447 /459 variables (removed 12) and now considering 433/446 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 433 rows 447 cols
[2025-05-30 17:59:07] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:59:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 286 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 469 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 432 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:59:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/447 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 134 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 134 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 136 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 76 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 16/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 447/880 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/447 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 432/432 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/447 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 76/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 10/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 3/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 3/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 2/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 447/880 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/447 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/432 constraints, Known Traps: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60077ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60081ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 447/459 places, 433/446 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60587 ms. Remains : 447/459 places, 433/446 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 239 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 63 steps with 0 reset in 10 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 60893 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(((p0 U p1) U X(!p0)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 459 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 459/459 places, 446/446 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 452 transition count 439
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 452 transition count 439
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 450 transition count 436
Applied a total of 19 rules in 31 ms. Remains 450 /459 variables (removed 9) and now considering 436/446 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 436 rows 450 cols
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 279 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 411 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 435 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:00:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 133 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 146 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 5/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 108 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 6/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 111 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 12/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 450/886 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/450 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 435/435 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 43/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 13/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 450/886 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/450 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/435 constraints, Known Traps: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 450/459 places, 436/446 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60507 ms. Remains : 450/459 places, 436/446 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 258 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0), p0, p0, p0, p0, p0, true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-01
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 280 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 60795 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 459 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 459/459 places, 446/446 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 166 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 166 transitions
Performed 166 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 166
Iterating post reduction 0 with 166 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 458 transition count 279
Reduce places removed 166 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 187 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 292 transition count 258
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 280 transition count 258
Performed 54 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 54 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 280 transition count 204
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 473 place count 226 transition count 204
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 479 place count 220 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 485 place count 220 transition count 198
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 485 place count 220 transition count 195
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 491 place count 217 transition count 195
Performed 83 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 83 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 166 rules applied. Total rules applied 657 place count 134 transition count 102
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 658 place count 133 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 676 place count 121 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 682 place count 115 transition count 95
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 682 place count 115 transition count 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 694 place count 109 transition count 89
Applied a total of 694 rules in 69 ms. Remains 109 /459 variables (removed 350) and now considering 89/446 (removed 357) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 109 cols
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [42, 62, 82, 86, 90, 94, 98, 103, 108]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/459 places, 89/446 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 93 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 93 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 92 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 92 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 91 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 91 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 90 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 90 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 89 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 89 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 88 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 88 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 87 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 87 transition count 76
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 86 transition count 75
Applied a total of 28 rules in 15 ms. Remains 86 /100 variables (removed 14) and now considering 75/89 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 86 cols
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 86/459 places, 75/446 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 304 ms. Remains : 86/459 places, 75/446 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 43 steps with 1 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 351 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(X(G(p0)))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 459 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 459/459 places, 446/446 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 450 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 450 transition count 437
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 450 transition count 436
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 447 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 447 transition count 433
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 446 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 446 transition count 432
Applied a total of 27 rules in 82 ms. Remains 446 /459 variables (removed 13) and now considering 432/446 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 446 cols
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 245 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 384 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 146 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 10/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 88 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/878 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 45/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 107 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 12/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/878 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/431 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 446/459 places, 432/446 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60528 ms. Remains : 446/459 places, 432/446 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 251 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2996 steps with 10 reset in 14 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 60810 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0&&F(G(p1))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 459 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 459/459 places, 446/446 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 451 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 451 transition count 438
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 451 transition count 437
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 448 transition count 434
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 447 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 447 transition count 433
Applied a total of 25 rules in 37 ms. Remains 447 /459 variables (removed 12) and now considering 433/446 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 433 rows 447 cols
[2025-05-30 18:02:10] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:02:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 284 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 428 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 432 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/447 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 141 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 9/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 6/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 85 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 447/880 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/447 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 432/432 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/447 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 55/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 107 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 100 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 12/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 7/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 1)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 1)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 1)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 1)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 1)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 1)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 1)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 0)
(s150 1)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 1)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 1)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 1)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 1)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 1)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 0)
(s194 0)
(s195 0)
(s196 1)
(s197 0)
(s198 0)
(s199 0)
(s200 0)
(s201 1)
(s202 0)
(s203 0)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 timeout
0)
(s207 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 447/880 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/447 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/432 constraints, Known Traps: 137/137 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60102ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60103ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 447/459 places, 433/446 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60570 ms. Remains : 447/459 places, 433/446 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 345 reset in 226 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 345 reset in 281 ms.
Computed a total of 108 stabilizing places and 108 stable transitions
Computed a total of 108 stabilizing places and 108 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 65 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[(NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 2006 steps (3 resets) in 24 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 96 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Support contains 2 out of 447 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 447/447 places, 433/433 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 154 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 154 transitions
Performed 154 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 154
Iterating post reduction 0 with 154 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 446 transition count 278
Reduce places removed 154 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 169 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 292 transition count 263
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 282 transition count 263
Performed 56 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 56 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 282 transition count 207
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 445 place count 226 transition count 207
Performed 86 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 12 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 86 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 86 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 617 place count 140 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 618 place count 139 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 632 place count 129 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 636 place count 125 transition count 104
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 636 place count 125 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 648 place count 119 transition count 98
Applied a total of 648 rules in 35 ms. Remains 119 /447 variables (removed 328) and now considering 98/433 (removed 335) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 119 cols
[2025-05-30 18:03:12] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [51, 71, 91, 95, 100, 104, 109, 113, 118]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/447 places, 98/433 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 103 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 103 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 102 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 102 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 101 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 101 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 100 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 100 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 99 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 99 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 98 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 98 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 97 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 97 transition count 85
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 96 transition count 84
Applied a total of 28 rules in 16 ms. Remains 96 /110 variables (removed 14) and now considering 84/98 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 96 cols
[2025-05-30 18:03:12] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:03:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:03:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 96/447 places, 84/433 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 273 ms. Remains : 96/447 places, 84/433 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p1, (X p1), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 70 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 258 steps (7 resets) in 5 ms. (43 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p1, (X p1), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 105 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 48 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3220 reset in 131 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 12200 steps with 395 reset with depth 20 and stack size 20 in 21 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 62410 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||G(p1)))'
Support contains 2 out of 459 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 459/459 places, 446/446 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 164 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 164 transitions
Performed 164 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 164
Iterating post reduction 0 with 164 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 458 transition count 281
Reduce places removed 164 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 182 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 294 transition count 263
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 284 transition count 263
Performed 56 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 56 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 284 transition count 207
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 228 transition count 207
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 473 place count 223 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 478 place count 223 transition count 202
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 478 place count 223 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 220 transition count 199
Performed 83 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 83 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 166 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 137 transition count 106
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 136 transition count 106
Applied a total of 652 rules in 35 ms. Remains 136 /459 variables (removed 323) and now considering 106/446 (removed 340) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 136 cols
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned [44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 55, 56, 57, 58, 78, 98, 104, 110, 116, 122, 128, 135]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 96 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 116/459 places, 106/446 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 116 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 105 transition count 95
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 98 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 98 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 97 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 97 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 96 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 96 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 95 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 95 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 94 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 94 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 93 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 93 transition count 83
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 92 transition count 82
Applied a total of 48 rules in 12 ms. Remains 92 /116 variables (removed 24) and now considering 82/106 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/459 places, 82/446 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 295 ms. Remains : 92/459 places, 82/446 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 48 steps with 1 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 437 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(((G(p0) U G(p1)) U (X(X(!p0)) U ((p2&&X(X(!p0)))||X(X(G(!p0)))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 459 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 459/459 places, 446/446 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 452 transition count 439
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 452 transition count 439
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 449 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 449 transition count 436
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 448 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 448 transition count 435
Applied a total of 22 rules in 32 ms. Remains 448 /459 variables (removed 11) and now considering 435/446 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 435 rows 448 cols
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:03:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 275 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 422 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 434 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:03:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 143 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 148 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 8/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 448/883 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 434/434 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 36/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 91 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 91 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 91 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 98 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 91 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 97 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 95 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 88 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 85 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 448/883 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/434 constraints, Known Traps: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 448/459 places, 435/446 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60510 ms. Remains : 448/459 places, 435/446 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 1032 ms :[p0, p0, p0, false, (AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0, p0, false, (AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p1) p0), p0, p0, false, (AND (NOT p1) p0), p0, false, p0, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), false, p0, p0, true, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 349 reset in 265 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 350 reset in 336 ms.
Computed a total of 108 stabilizing places and 108 stable transitions
Computed a total of 108 stabilizing places and 108 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0 p2), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (OR (AND p2 p1) (AND p2 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND p2 p1) (AND p2 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p2) p0))))), (X (X (AND p2 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 29 factoid took 275 ms. Reduced automaton from 27 states, 89 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 27 states, 89 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 1213 ms :[p0, p0, p0, false, (AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0, p0, false, (AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p1) p0), p0, p0, false, (AND (NOT p1) p0), p0, false, p0, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), false, p0, p0, true, (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (136 resets) in 431 ms. (92 steps per ms) remains 8/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (12 resets) in 167 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (11 resets) in 183 ms. (217 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (11 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (11 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (11 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (11 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-05-30 18:04:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 93/98 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 318/416 variables, 35/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 32/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 435/883 variables, 448/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/883 variables, 0/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/883 variables, 0/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 883/883 variables, and 488 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 517 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 448/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 93/98 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 318/416 variables, 35/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 2/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/448 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 6/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 435/883 variables, 448/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/883 variables, 7/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/883 variables, 0/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/883 variables, 0/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 883/883 variables, and 504 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 2015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 448/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2544ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Fused 7 Parikh solutions to 5 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 9993 steps, including 39 resets, run visited all 7 properties in 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=285 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 7 properties in 36 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0 p2), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (OR (AND p2 p1) (AND p2 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (OR (AND p2 p1) (AND p2 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p2) p0))))), (X (X (AND p2 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0))), (F (NOT (AND (OR (NOT p1) p2) (OR p2 (NOT p0))))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR (AND p1 p2) (AND p2 p0)))), (F (NOT (AND p2 p0))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0))))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(F (NOT (OR p1 p2 (NOT p0))))
Knowledge based reduction with 29 factoid took 810 ms. Reduced automaton from 27 states, 89 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-06b-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 67581 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 376897 ms.

BK_STOP 1748628261120

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-06b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500531"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-06b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-06b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;