Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729500530.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500530
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 636K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 147K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748627841929

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-06b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 94 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Transformed 574 places.
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Transformed 572 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 574 places and 572 transitions and 1334 arcs in 185 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 109 out of 574 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 574/574 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 519 transition count 517
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 519 transition count 517
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 519 transition count 512
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 504 transition count 497
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 504 transition count 497
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 501 transition count 494
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 501 transition count 494
Applied a total of 151 rules in 135 ms. Remains 501 /574 variables (removed 73) and now considering 494/572 (removed 78) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 494 rows 501 cols
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 27 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 365 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 314 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 711 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 493 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:57:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/500 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/501 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 92 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 87 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 91 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 79 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 87 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 77 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 80 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 89 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 92 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 148 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 127 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 97 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 1.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 1.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 1.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 1.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 1.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 1.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 1.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 1.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 1.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 1.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 1.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 1.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 1.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 1.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 1.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 1.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 1.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 0.0)
(s311 0.0)
(s312 0.0)
(s313 0.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 0.0)
(s318 0.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 0.0)
(s321 0.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 0.0)
(s326 0.0)
(s327 0.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 0.0)
(s330 0.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 1.0)
(s333 0.0)
(s334 0.0)
(s335 0.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 0.0)
(s338 0.0)
(s339 0.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 0.0)
(s342 0.0)
(s343 0.0)
(s344 0.0)
(s345 0.0)
(s346 0.0)
(s347 0.0)
(s348 0.0)
(s349 0.0)
(s350 0.0)
(s351 0.0)
(s352 0.0)
(s353 0.0)
(s354 0.0)
(s355 0.0)
(s356 0.0)
(s357 0.0)
(s358 0.0)
(s359 0.0)
(s360 0.0)
(s361 0.0)
(s362 0.0)
(s363 0.0)
(s364 0.0)
(s365 0.0)
(s366 0.0)
(s367 0.0)
(s368 0.0)
(s369 0.0)
(s370 0.0)
(s371 0.0)
(s372 0.0)
(s373 0.0)
(s374 0.0)
(s375 0.0)
(s376 0.0)
(s377 0.0)
(s378 0.0)
(s379 0.0)
(s380 0.0)
(s381 0.0)
(s382 0.0)
(s383 0.0)
(s384 0.0)
(s385 0.0)
(s386 0.0)
(s387 0.0)
(s388 0.0)
(s389 0.0)
(s390 0.0)
(s391 0.0)
(s392 0.0)
(s393 0.0)
(s394 1.0)
(s395 0.0)
(s396 0.0)
(s397 0.0)
(s398 0.0)
(s399 0.0)
(s400 0.0)
(s401 1.0)
(s402 0.0)
(s403 0.0)
(s404 0.0)
(s405 0.0)
(s406 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 501/995 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/501 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 493/493 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/500 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/501 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 80/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 144 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 107 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 107 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 104 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 107 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 100 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 104 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 105 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 20/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 501/995 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/501 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/493 constraints, Known Traps: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 493 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60146ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 501/574 places, 494/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61012 ms. Remains : 501/574 places, 494/572 transitions.
Support contains 109 out of 501 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 494 transitions.
Support contains 104 out of 501 places (down from 109) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 72 to 71
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (136 resets) in 1213 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 12/71 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (12 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (11 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (11 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 72 ms. (548 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 10/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (13 resets) in 73 ms. (540 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (12 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (11 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 65 ms. (606 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 361/382 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 4/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/472 variables, 12/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 3/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 29/501 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 113 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 127 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 9/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 494/995 variables, 501/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/995 variables, 0/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/995 variables, 0/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 995/995 variables, and 557 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved in 3213 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 501/501 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 145/157 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 314/471 variables, 31/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 12/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/501 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 101 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 105 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 4/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 494/995 variables, 501/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/995 variables, 7/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 113 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 106 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/995 variables, 5/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/995 variables, 2/575 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/995 variables, 0/575 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/995 variables, 1/576 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 113 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/995 variables, 1/577 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/995 variables, 1/578 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 35 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/995 variables, 1/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/995 variables, 0/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/995 variables, 0/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 995/995 variables, and 579 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved in 5011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 501/501 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/10 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8232ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 7 unsolved
Fused 7 Parikh solutions to 5 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 3091 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 501 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 165 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 165 transitions
Performed 165 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 165
Iterating post reduction 0 with 165 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 501 transition count 329
Reduce places removed 165 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 191 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 336 transition count 303
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 324 transition count 299
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 320 transition count 298
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 320 transition count 235
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 503 place count 257 transition count 235
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 522 place count 238 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 541 place count 238 transition count 216
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 541 place count 238 transition count 208
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 557 place count 230 transition count 208
Performed 80 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 717 place count 150 transition count 118
Free-agglomeration rule applied 22 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 739 place count 150 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 761 place count 128 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 762 place count 127 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 764 place count 125 transition count 95
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 764 place count 125 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 768 place count 123 transition count 93
Applied a total of 768 rules in 70 ms. Remains 123 /501 variables (removed 378) and now considering 93/494 (removed 401) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 70 ms. Remains : 123/501 places, 93/494 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1388 resets) in 783 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 2/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (337 resets) in 126 ms. (314 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (370 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 123 cols
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 53 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 33/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 27/65 variables, 23/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 48/113 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 6/119 variables, 6/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 93/212 variables, 119/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 53/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 4/216 variables, 4/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 256 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, ReadFeed: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 33/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 27/65 variables, 23/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 48/113 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 6/119 variables, 6/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 93/212 variables, 119/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 53/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 4/216 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 287 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, ReadFeed: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 548ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 70 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 123 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 93/93 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 123 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 120 transition count 90
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 120 transition count 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 119 transition count 89
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 119 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 118 transition count 88
Applied a total of 10 rules in 9 ms. Remains 118 /123 variables (removed 5) and now considering 88/93 (removed 5) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 9 ms. Remains : 118/123 places, 88/93 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (472 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (123 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 3364 steps (12 resets) in 11 ms. (280 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 494 transitions.
Support contains 92 out of 501 places (down from 93) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 142 stabilizing places and 142 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 468 transition count 461
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 468 transition count 461
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 468 transition count 454
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 456 transition count 442
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 456 transition count 442
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 454 transition count 440
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 454 transition count 440
Applied a total of 101 rules in 67 ms. Remains 454 /501 variables (removed 47) and now considering 440/494 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 440 rows 454 cols
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:58:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 275 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 426 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 439 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:58:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/454 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 6/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 11/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 85 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 454/894 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/454 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 439/439 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/454 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 57/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 11/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 99 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 6/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 1)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 1)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 1)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 1)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 1)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 1)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 1)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 1)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 1)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 1)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 1)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 1)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 1)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 1)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 1)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 1)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 1)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 1)
(s191 0)
(s192 timeout
0)
(s193 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 454/894 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/454 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/439 constraints, Known Traps: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60074ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 454/501 places, 440/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60569 ms. Remains : 454/501 places, 440/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:59:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:59:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12508106113526260659.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7254070297829089365.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12508106113526260659.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7254070297829089365.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10305373756924815040.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10305373756924815040.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10305373756924815040.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10305373756924815040.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10305373756924815040.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 86 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability647745142669293118.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14448288762628778622.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability647745142669293118.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14448288762628778622.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.3325e+32,5.08702,182840,22305,14,363157,286,748,548238,28,572,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 466 transition count 459
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 466 transition count 459
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 466 transition count 452
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 452 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 448 transition count 434
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 446 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 446 transition count 432
Applied a total of 117 rules in 44 ms. Remains 446 /501 variables (removed 55) and now considering 432/494 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 446 cols
[2025-05-30 18:00:39] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 235 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 378 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 132 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 126 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 10/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 83 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/878 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 45/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 92 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 12/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/878 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/431 constraints, Known Traps: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 446/501 places, 432/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60482 ms. Remains : 446/501 places, 432/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14936850398844015711.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8020615196749013277.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14936850398844015711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8020615196749013277.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15772906875719256281.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15772906875719256281.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15772906875719256281.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15772906875719256281.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15772906875719256281.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 86 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6252574666020358615.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5604697714923648939.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6252574666020358615.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5604697714923648939.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.3597e+32,1.05651,47736,10391,16,93695,265,723,103794,35,498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((i2.u10.p23==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((i2.u10.p23==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t132, t142, t145, t158, t168, t171, t194, t197, t222, t244, t259, t266, t288, t310, t325, t41...975
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 175 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 175 transitions
Performed 175 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 175
Iterating post reduction 0 with 175 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 500 transition count 318
Reduce places removed 175 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 202 rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 325 transition count 291
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 313 transition count 291
Performed 62 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 62 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 313 transition count 229
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 513 place count 251 transition count 229
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 531 place count 233 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 549 place count 233 transition count 211
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 549 place count 233 transition count 204
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 563 place count 226 transition count 204
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 703 place count 156 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 713 place count 156 transition count 124
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 733 place count 146 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 734 place count 145 transition count 113
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 741 place count 139 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 742 place count 138 transition count 112
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 742 place count 138 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 752 place count 133 transition count 107
Applied a total of 752 rules in 51 ms. Remains 133 /501 variables (removed 368) and now considering 107/494 (removed 387) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 133 cols
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [59, 79, 99, 104, 109, 119, 125, 132]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/501 places, 107/494 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 119 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 119 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 118 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 118 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 117 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 117 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 116 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 116 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 115 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 115 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 114 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 114 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 113 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 113 transition count 95
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 111 transition count 93
Applied a total of 28 rules in 17 ms. Remains 111 /125 variables (removed 14) and now considering 93/107 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 111 cols
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 111/501 places, 93/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 282 ms. Remains : 111/501 places, 93/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15760916450055149310.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2350808893701388567.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15760916450055149310.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2350808893701388567.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.99425e+10,0.042906,5764,2,934,5,7728,6,0,524,10814,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((p348==0)) + EG(((EG(((p528==1)&&(p570==1))) * (p55==0)) * (p179==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(p348==0))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,((EG(((p528==1)&&(p570==1))) * (p55==0)) * (p179==0)))] != FALSE)
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 91/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.218785,14084,1,0,30,57319,19,4,2542,27393,27
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 468 transition count 461
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 468 transition count 461
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 468 transition count 454
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 454 transition count 440
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 454 transition count 440
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 450 transition count 436
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 448 transition count 434
Applied a total of 113 rules in 82 ms. Remains 448 /501 variables (removed 53) and now considering 434/494 (removed 60) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 434 rows 448 cols
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 270 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 404 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 433 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 130 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 83 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 83 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 91 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30073ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30075ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 448/501 places, 434/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30563 ms. Remains : 448/501 places, 434/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 434 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9515386321825265430.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11346851547175175336.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9515386321825265430.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11346851547175175336.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6550027411400397329.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6550027411400397329.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6550027411400397329.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6550027411400397329.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6550027411400397329.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 84 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15551955033664315794.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3045047293219166768.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15551955033664315794.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3045047293219166768.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.19326e+32,0.800728,35364,7717,20,67815,307,766,86144,36,543,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(EX(((AG((i0.u5.p13==1)) * (i20.u138.p445==1)) * (i25.u100.p355==1)))) * A((((i21.i0.i0.u146.p463==1)||(i15.u95.p337==1))||(i7.u44....206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(EX(((!(E(TRUE U !((i0.u5.p13==1)))) * (i20.u138.p445==1)) * (i25.u100.p355==1)))))) * !((E(...370
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t143, t157, t160, t170, t173, t183, t186, t224, t246, t261, t268, t283, t290, t312, t327, t41...1007
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 469 transition count 462
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 469 transition count 462
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 469 transition count 456
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 456 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 456 transition count 443
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 452 transition count 439
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 452 transition count 439
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 450 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 450 transition count 437
Applied a total of 108 rules in 60 ms. Remains 450 /501 variables (removed 51) and now considering 437/494 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 437 rows 450 cols
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 163 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 296 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 463 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 436 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 83 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 80 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 132 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 99 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 15/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 97 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 450/887 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/450 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 436/436 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 80/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 18/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 9/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 82 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 80 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 450/887 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/450 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/436 constraints, Known Traps: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 450/501 places, 437/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60579 ms. Remains : 450/501 places, 437/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 437 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8405462739709989066.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9114948662359925792.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8405462739709989066.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9114948662359925792.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:05:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:05:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6287235222446946612.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6287235222446946612.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6287235222446946612.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6287235222446946612.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6287235222446946612.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:05:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:05:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:05:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 82 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:05:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability369722705858427102.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9385949303787654793.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability369722705858427102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9385949303787654793.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.94242e+32,2.29501,89576,17410,18,170035,292,694,240743,42,535,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((i4.u16.p40==1) U A(((!(((((i15.u79.p293==1)||(i18.u112.p389==1))||(i2.u70.p251!=1)) * AG((i14.u147.p474==1)))) + AX((i9.u47.p161==1)))...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((i15.u82.p297==1))))) U (!(((!(((((i15.u79.p293==1)||(i18.u112.p389==1))||(i2.u70...1151
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t131, t134, t157, t160, t170, t173, t196, t199, t224, t246, t284, t293, t308, t315, t422, t42...1011
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 174 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 174 transitions
Performed 174 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 174
Iterating post reduction 0 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 500 transition count 319
Reduce places removed 174 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 326 transition count 293
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 314 transition count 293
Performed 61 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 61 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 314 transition count 232
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 508 place count 253 transition count 232
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 527 place count 234 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 546 place count 234 transition count 213
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 546 place count 234 transition count 204
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 564 place count 225 transition count 204
Performed 72 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 708 place count 153 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 718 place count 153 transition count 122
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 738 place count 143 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 739 place count 142 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 747 place count 135 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 748 place count 134 transition count 110
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 748 place count 134 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 760 place count 128 transition count 104
Applied a total of 760 rules in 39 ms. Remains 128 /501 variables (removed 373) and now considering 104/494 (removed 390) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 128 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [57, 77, 97, 102, 107, 111, 116, 121, 127]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/501 places, 104/494 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 112 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 112 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 111 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 111 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 110 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 110 transition count 95
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 109 transition count 94
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 109 /119 variables (removed 10) and now considering 94/104 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 109 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 109/501 places, 94/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 252 ms. Remains : 109/501 places, 94/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4679990100929922699.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17966964234175071960.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4679990100929922699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17966964234175071960.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.01614e+10,0.057744,6272,2,560,5,9543,6,0,518,13413,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(AF(((p154==1)||(p142==1))) U (p130==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EG(!(((p154==1)||(p142==1))))) U (p130==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t88, t89, t91, t92, t93, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...188
(forward)formula 0,0,9.54574,359212,1,0,1011,2.32356e+06,215,510,3015,2.55287e+06,1095
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 177 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 177 transitions
Performed 177 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 177
Iterating post reduction 0 with 177 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 500 transition count 316
Reduce places removed 177 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 204 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 323 transition count 289
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 311 transition count 289
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 311 transition count 226
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 519 place count 248 transition count 226
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 539 place count 228 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 559 place count 228 transition count 206
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 559 place count 228 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 577 place count 219 transition count 197
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 719 place count 148 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 729 place count 148 transition count 116
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 749 place count 138 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 750 place count 137 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 758 place count 130 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 759 place count 129 transition count 104
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 759 place count 129 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 771 place count 123 transition count 98
Applied a total of 771 rules in 29 ms. Remains 123 /501 variables (removed 378) and now considering 98/494 (removed 396) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 123 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [52, 72, 92, 97, 102, 106, 111, 116, 122]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/501 places, 98/494 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 107 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 101 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 85
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 100 transition count 84
Applied a total of 28 rules in 25 ms. Remains 100 /114 variables (removed 14) and now considering 84/98 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 100 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 100/501 places, 84/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 252 ms. Remains : 100/501 places, 84/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13831637862168527781.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability852958067050036247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13831637862168527781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability852958067050036247.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.10871e+09,0.02729,4668,2,456,5,3257,6,0,472,3959,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p219!=1)||(p403!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p219!=1)||(p403!=1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t78, t79, t81, t82, t83, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/revers...184
(forward)formula 0,1,0.200948,13500,1,0,166,52159,193,78,2934,43239,183
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 174 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 174 transitions
Performed 174 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 174
Iterating post reduction 0 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 500 transition count 319
Reduce places removed 174 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 201 rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 326 transition count 292
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 314 transition count 291
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 313 transition count 291
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 313 transition count 228
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 515 place count 250 transition count 228
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 535 place count 230 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 555 place count 230 transition count 208
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 555 place count 230 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 573 place count 221 transition count 199
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 715 place count 150 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 725 place count 150 transition count 118
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 745 place count 140 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 746 place count 139 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 754 place count 132 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 755 place count 131 transition count 106
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 755 place count 131 transition count 100
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 767 place count 125 transition count 100
Applied a total of 767 rules in 32 ms. Remains 125 /501 variables (removed 376) and now considering 100/494 (removed 394) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 125 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [52, 74, 94, 99, 104, 108, 113, 118, 124]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 116/501 places, 100/494 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 109 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 109 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 108 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 108 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 107 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 107 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 106 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 106 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 105 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 105 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 104 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 104 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 103 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 103 transition count 87
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 102 transition count 86
Applied a total of 28 rules in 9 ms. Remains 102 /116 variables (removed 14) and now considering 86/100 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 102 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 102/501 places, 86/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 249 ms. Remains : 102/501 places, 86/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8995639010174436816.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15010459540145880241.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8995639010174436816.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15010459540145880241.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 20686 steps (841 resets) in 60 ms. (339 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 174 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 174 transitions
Performed 174 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 174
Iterating post reduction 0 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 500 transition count 319
Reduce places removed 174 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 197 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 326 transition count 296
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 316 transition count 295
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 315 transition count 294
Performed 62 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 62 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 315 transition count 232
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 508 place count 253 transition count 232
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 528 place count 233 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 548 place count 233 transition count 212
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 548 place count 233 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 568 place count 223 transition count 202
Performed 72 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 712 place count 151 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 722 place count 151 transition count 120
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 742 place count 141 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 743 place count 140 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 751 place count 133 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 752 place count 132 transition count 108
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 752 place count 132 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 764 place count 126 transition count 102
Applied a total of 764 rules in 42 ms. Remains 126 /501 variables (removed 375) and now considering 102/494 (removed 392) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 126 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [55, 75, 95, 100, 105, 109, 114, 119, 125]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/501 places, 102/494 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 110 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 110 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 109 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 109 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 108 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 107 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 107 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 106 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 106 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 105 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 105 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 104 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 104 transition count 89
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 88
Applied a total of 28 rules in 8 ms. Remains 103 /117 variables (removed 14) and now considering 88/102 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 103 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:06:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/501 places, 88/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 245 ms. Remains : 103/501 places, 88/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7158917596858418831.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7350839190123564741.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7158917596858418831.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7350839190123564741.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17528e+10,0.027779,4976,2,635,5,4212,6,0,491,5646,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((p167==0)) + AG((p319==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG((p167==0)))),TRUE) * !((p319==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t15, t82, t83, t86, t87, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...188
(forward)formula 0,1,2.43289,110896,1,0,610,669374,200,281,2829,733052,676
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 469 transition count 462
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 469 transition count 462
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 469 transition count 455
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 456 transition count 442
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 456 transition count 442
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 452 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 450 transition count 436
Applied a total of 109 rules in 28 ms. Remains 450 /501 variables (removed 51) and now considering 436/494 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 436 rows 450 cols
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 250 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 382 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 435 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 102 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 108 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 8/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
(s88 0.0timeout
^^^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0.0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 450/886 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/450 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 435/435 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 68/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 4/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 80 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 6/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 7/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 450/886 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/450 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/435 constraints, Known Traps: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60057ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 450/501 places, 436/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60468 ms. Remains : 450/501 places, 436/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:07:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 436 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:07:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9977563545567853341.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5383925332310008420.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9977563545567853341.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5383925332310008420.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6094983997043424984.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6094983997043424984.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6094983997043424984.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6094983997043424984.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6094983997043424984.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 85 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4148130827488697782.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15631967668897403120.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4148130827488697782.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15631967668897403120.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.17825e+32,1.80456,68492,13438,20,122154,315,721,198250,35,601,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AX((EF(((i8.u41.p141==1)&&(i8.u119.p401==1))) + (((EX((i14.u74.p266==1)) + (i20.u128.p420==1)) + (i17.u94.p346==1)) * AG((i27.u187.p5...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((EY(EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U EX((i4.u35.p118==1))))))) * !(E(TRUE U ((i8.u41.p141==1)&&(i8.u119.p401==1))))) *...395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t135, t145, t159, t162, t185, t188, t219, t241, t270, t285, t307, t329, t421, t422, t423, t42...1024
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 173 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 173 transitions
Performed 173 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 173
Iterating post reduction 0 with 173 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 500 transition count 320
Reduce places removed 173 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 327 transition count 293
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 315 transition count 292
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 314 transition count 292
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 314 transition count 229
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 513 place count 251 transition count 229
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 532 place count 232 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 551 place count 232 transition count 210
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 551 place count 232 transition count 201
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 569 place count 223 transition count 201
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 709 place count 153 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 719 place count 153 transition count 121
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 739 place count 143 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 740 place count 142 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 743 place count 139 transition count 110
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 743 place count 139 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 749 place count 136 transition count 107
Applied a total of 749 rules in 31 ms. Remains 136 /501 variables (removed 365) and now considering 107/494 (removed 387) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 136 cols
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [81, 101, 107, 113, 119, 124, 129, 135]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/501 places, 107/494 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 122 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 122 transition count 101
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 120 transition count 99
Applied a total of 16 rules in 5 ms. Remains 120 /128 variables (removed 8) and now considering 99/107 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 120 cols
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 120/501 places, 99/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 349 ms. Remains : 120/501 places, 99/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9224132741856473639.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2829263051653592574.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9224132741856473639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2829263051653592574.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.52585e+10,0.080302,7104,2,2185,5,13478,6,0,561,15162,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(A(EF((p420!=1)) U (p313==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((E(!((p313==1)) U (!(E(TRUE U (p420!=1))) * !((p313==1)))) + EG(!((p313==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t78, t86, t87, t89, t93, t94, t96, t97, t98, Intersection with reachable at each step enable...204
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,26.8499,838352,1,0,838,5.37517e+06,237,413,3542,4.30361e+06,950
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 469 transition count 462
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 469 transition count 462
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 469 transition count 456
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 456 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 456 transition count 443
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 452 transition count 439
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 452 transition count 439
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 450 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 450 transition count 437
Applied a total of 108 rules in 40 ms. Remains 450 /501 variables (removed 51) and now considering 437/494 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 437 rows 450 cols
[2025-05-30 18:08:53] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:08:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 277 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 414 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 436 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 84 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 85 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 76 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 84 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 137 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 98 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 11/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 104 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30142ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 436 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30142ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 450/501 places, 437/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30597 ms. Remains : 450/501 places, 437/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 437 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8425444807289183022.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14477467712931981663.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8425444807289183022.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14477467712931981663.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11019503988514528438.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11019503988514528438.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11019503988514528438.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11019503988514528438.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11019503988514528438.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 86 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7420439049526217517.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15452462386077338855.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7420439049526217517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15452462386077338855.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.95773e+32,2.27924,83256,13513,14,156766,284,753,245260,32,542,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(A(((AX((i15.u28.p72==1)) * (AG((i23.u153.p483==1)) + (i11.u73.p251==1))) * ((i13.u7.p16!=1)&&(i2.u59.p204==1))) U EG(EF((i21.u161.p50...188
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(EG(E(TRUE U (i21.u161.p501==1))))) * !(((!(EX(!((i15.u28.p72==1)))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((i23.u1...396
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t134, t157, t160, t170, t173, t183, t186, t239, t248, t270, t292, t330, t422, t423, t424, t42...1037
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 472 transition count 465
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 472 transition count 465
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 472 transition count 460
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 459 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 459 transition count 447
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 455 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 455 transition count 443
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 453 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 453 transition count 441
Applied a total of 101 rules in 32 ms. Remains 453 /501 variables (removed 48) and now considering 441/494 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 441 rows 453 cols
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 270 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 416 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 440 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:10:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/453 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 94 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 106 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 138 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 111 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 111 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 109 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 111 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 110 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 17/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 453/894 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/453 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 440/440 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/453 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 77/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 12/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 96 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 9/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60133ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60134ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 453/501 places, 441/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60583 ms. Remains : 453/501 places, 441/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 441 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7117996450677689555.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9369733356864046303.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7117996450677689555.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9369733356864046303.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15738582057109326572.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15738582057109326572.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15738582057109326572.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15738582057109326572.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15738582057109326572.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4826525665762779782.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9709879796502069294.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4826525665762779782.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9709879796502069294.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04334e+33,3.75616,130936,17219,27,268617,381,842,355258,49,1008,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX((AG((((i14.u64.p232==1)&&(i1.i2.u87.p321==1)) + AF((i28.i1.u187.p554==1)))) + ((EF((i7.i1.u20.p53==1)) * (i4.u15.p36==1)) * (i6.u118...417
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!((E(TRUE U ((i27.i1.u182.p552==1) + !(E(TRUE U !((i23.i1.u146.p463==1)))))) + !(!(EG(!((i14....1118
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t133, t136, t159, t172, t175, t185, t188, t198, t201, t219, t226, t243, t287, t296, t318, t33...1135
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 475 transition count 468
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 475 transition count 468
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 475 transition count 463
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 464 transition count 452
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 464 transition count 452
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 462 transition count 450
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 462 transition count 450
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 461 transition count 449
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 461 transition count 449
Applied a total of 85 rules in 30 ms. Remains 461 /501 variables (removed 40) and now considering 449/494 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 449 rows 461 cols
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 144 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 271 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 416 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 448 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/461 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 146 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 141 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 124 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 116 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 95 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 118 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 117 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 117 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 123 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 111 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 105 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 100 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 117 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 112 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 116 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 108 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 105 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 100 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 105 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 110 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 107 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 461/910 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/461 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 448/448 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/461 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 80/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 99 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 105 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 94 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 20/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 96 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60059ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 448 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60061ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 461/501 places, 449/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60509 ms. Remains : 461/501 places, 449/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 449 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11565116625214104233.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14263268245017568086.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11565116625214104233.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14263268245017568086.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11507481745141383245.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11507481745141383245.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11507481745141383245.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11507481745141383245.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11507481745141383245.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13679617708992079611.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5209944864771934853.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13679617708992079611.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5209944864771934853.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08865e+33,18.6882,554480,31495,29,1.02597e+06,426,758,1.95501e+06,54,1150,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 468 transition count 461
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 468 transition count 461
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 468 transition count 454
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 456 transition count 442
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 456 transition count 442
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 452 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 450 transition count 436
Applied a total of 109 rules in 29 ms. Remains 450 /501 variables (removed 51) and now considering 436/494 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 436 rows 450 cols
[2025-05-30 18:14:26] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:14:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 258 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 396 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 435 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:14:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 140 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 138 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 86 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 450/886 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/450 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 435/435 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 51/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 82 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 78 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 100 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 436/886 variables, 450/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/886 variables, 435/1046 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 886/886 variables, and 1046 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 450/450 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 435/435 constraints, Known Traps: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 435 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 450/501 places, 436/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60487 ms. Remains : 450/501 places, 436/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:15:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 436 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:15:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12264572699856872430.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11806628344480862371.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12264572699856872430.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11806628344480862371.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11745474800075079072.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11745474800075079072.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11745474800075079072.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11745474800075079072.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11745474800075079072.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 87 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10822685163675403168.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2017423381339377758.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10822685163675403168.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2017423381339377758.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.50029e+32,1.02331,46612,11865,14,86595,303,725,122955,28,580,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(!((((EF((i25.u157.p485==1)) + ((i17.u88.p307==1)&&(i16.u83.p298==1))) * (i17.u91.p313==1)) * A((i18.u96.p327==1) U EX(((i2.u15.p36==...207
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((i18.u95.p324==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((i18.u95.p324==1))))) U (!(!((((E(TRUE U (i2...459
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t132, t155, t158, t170, t173, t185, t188, t201, t219, t226, t241, t248, t263, t270, t292, t30...979
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 501/501 places, 494/494 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 469 transition count 462
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 469 transition count 462
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 469 transition count 456
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 456 transition count 443
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 456 transition count 443
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 453 transition count 440
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 453 transition count 440
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 451 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 451 transition count 438
Applied a total of 106 rules in 29 ms. Remains 451 /501 variables (removed 50) and now considering 438/494 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 438 rows 451 cols
[2025-05-30 18:16:26] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:16:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 268 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 404 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 437 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:16:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/451 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 89 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 97 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 95 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 451/889 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/451 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 437/437 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/451 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 92/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 7/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 80 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 9/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 75 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 4/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 104 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 102 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 451/889 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/451 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/437 constraints, Known Traps: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60060ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 437 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 451/501 places, 438/494 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60494 ms. Remains : 451/501 places, 438/494 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 438 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12714414744855306179.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9768940695437260801.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12714414744855306179.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9768940695437260801.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4080092304496385473.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4080092304496385473.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4080092304496385473.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4080092304496385473.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4080092304496385473.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 85 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7861460131308699071.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10272771913033353975.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7861460131308699071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10272771913033353975.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.13625e+32,4.88365,163196,23738,26,315807,491,717,484147,43,1342,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13114467162410396277.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13114467162410396277.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13114467162410396277.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13114467162410396277.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13114467162410396277.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 66 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6478199618851259545.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability417235857900861616.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6478199618851259545.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability417235857900861616.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.3485e+33,23.2051,649836,61535,31,1.04482e+06,465,865,2.58284e+06,55,1188,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(!(A(((((i10.u46.p133==1)||(i3.u10.p22==1))||((i6.u22.p55==1)&&(i23.i0.i1.u121.p374==1))) * AX(((i24.u167.p477==1)&&(i23.i1.i2.u206.p5...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(EG((i21.u131.p397!=1)))) * !(((((i10.u46.p133==1)||(i3.u10.p22==1))||((i6.u22.p55==1)&&(i23...373
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t162, t177, t195, t270, t337, t357, t479, t480, t482, t483, t484, t485, i0.t179, i0.u99.t36, ...1429
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:45:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:45:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 102 ms
[2025-05-30 18:45:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:45:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:45:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:45:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 175 ms
[2025-05-30 18:45:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 288 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:45:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10080064868551908302.gal : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 18:45:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11462494458635769721.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10080064868551908302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11462494458635769721.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-06b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500530"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-06b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-06b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;