Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729500529.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500529
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 636K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 147K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748627842054

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-06b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 171 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Transformed 574 places.
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Transformed 572 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 574 places and 572 transitions and 1334 arcs in 328 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 95 out of 574 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 574/574 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 512 transition count 510
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 512 transition count 510
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 512 transition count 503
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 488 transition count 479
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 488 transition count 479
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 485 transition count 476
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 485 transition count 476
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 482 transition count 473
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 482 transition count 473
Applied a total of 191 rules in 296 ms. Remains 482 /574 variables (removed 92) and now considering 473/572 (removed 99) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 473 rows 482 cols
[2025-05-30 17:57:24] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 31 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1042 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:57:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 596 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1700 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 472 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:57:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/482 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 154 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 294 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 82 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 149 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 194 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 163 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 157 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 120 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 122 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 114 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 123 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 119 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 108 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 482/955 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/482 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 472/472 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/481 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/482 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 75/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 146 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 129 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 6/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 117 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 121 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 115 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60241ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 472 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60259ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 482/574 places, 473/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62296 ms. Remains : 482/574 places, 473/572 transitions.
Support contains 95 out of 482 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:28] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 17:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 473 transitions.
Support contains 75 out of 482 places (down from 95) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (136 resets) in 1373 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 13/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (10 resets) in 190 ms. (209 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (11 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 99 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 125 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 12/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 78 ms. (506 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (11 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 11/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (11 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 97 ms. (408 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
[2025-05-30 17:58:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 176/190 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 267/457 variables, 33/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/482 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 473/955 variables, 482/522 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/955 variables, 0/522 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/955 variables, 0/522 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 955/955 variables, and 522 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved in 704 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 482/482 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 176/190 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 267/457 variables, 33/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 6/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 25/482 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 122 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 118 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 110 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 8/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 473/955 variables, 482/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/955 variables, 11/550 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 114 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 135 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 129 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/955 variables, 6/556 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/955 variables, 2/558 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/955 variables, 1/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5728ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Fused 11 Parikh solutions to 4 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 9 properties in 1713 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 482 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 170 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 170 transitions
Performed 170 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 170
Iterating post reduction 0 with 170 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 482 transition count 303
Reduce places removed 170 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 196 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 312 transition count 277
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 300 transition count 276
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 299 transition count 276
Performed 55 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 55 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 299 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 490 place count 244 transition count 221
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 503 place count 231 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 4 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 516 place count 231 transition count 208
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 516 place count 231 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 536 place count 221 transition count 198
Performed 82 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 9 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 82 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 82 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 164 rules applied. Total rules applied 700 place count 139 transition count 107
Free-agglomeration rule applied 24 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 724 place count 139 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 748 place count 115 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 749 place count 114 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 5 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 825 place count 86 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 873 place count 38 transition count 34
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 873 place count 38 transition count 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 893 place count 28 transition count 24
Applied a total of 893 rules in 73 ms. Remains 28 /482 variables (removed 454) and now considering 24/473 (removed 449) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 74 ms. Remains : 28/482 places, 24/473 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 170 steps (0 resets) in 11 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
[2025-05-30 17:58:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 473 transitions.
Computed a total of 128 stabilizing places and 128 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 460 transition count 451
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 460 transition count 451
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 460 transition count 447
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 454 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 454 transition count 441
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 453 transition count 440
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 453 transition count 440
Applied a total of 62 rules in 56 ms. Remains 453 /482 variables (removed 29) and now considering 440/473 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 440 rows 453 cols
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 269 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 437 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 439 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:58:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/453 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 153 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 141 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 108 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 105 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 106 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 108 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 9/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 453/893 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/453 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 439/439 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/453 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 69/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 111 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 20/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 16/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 6/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 1)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 1)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 1)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 1)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 1)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 1)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 1)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 1)
(s181 0)
(s182 0)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 1)
(s186 0)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 1)
(s194 0)
(s195 0)
(s196 0)
(s197 0)
(s198 1)
(s199 0)
(s200 0)
(s201 0)
(s202 0)
(s203 0)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 1)
(s207 0)
(s208 0)
(s209 0)
(s210 0)
(s211 0)
(s212 0)
(s213 0)
(s214 1)
(s215 0)
(s216 0)
(s217 0)
(s218 0)
(s219 1)
(s220 0)
(s221 0)
(s222 0)
(s223 0)
(s224 0)
(s225 0)
(s226 0)
(s227 1)
(s228 0)
(s229 0)
(s230 0)
(s231 0)
(s232 1)
(s233 0)
(s234 0)
(s235 0)
(s236 0)
(s237 0)
(s238 0)
(s239 1)
(s240 0)
(s241 0)
(s242 0)
(s243 0)
(s244 0)
(s245 1)
(s246 0)
(s247 0)
(s248 0)
(s249 0)
(s250 0)
(s251 0)
(s252 0)
(s253 1)
(s254 0)
(s255 0)
(s256 0)
(s257 0)
(s258 0)
(s259 0)
(s260 0)
(s261 0)
(s262 0)
(s263 0)
(s264 0)
(s265 0)
(s266 0)
(s267 0)
(s268 0)
(s269 0)
(s270 0)
(s271 0)
(s272 0)
(s273 0)
(s274 0)
(s275 0)
(s276 0)
(s277 0)
(s278 0)
(s279 0)
(s280 0)
(s281 0)
(s282 0)
(s283 0)
(s284 0)
(s285 0)
(s286 0)
(s287 0)
(s288 0)
(s289 0)
(s290 0)
(s291 0)
(s292 0)
(s293 0)
(s294 0)
(s295 0)
(s296 0)
(s297 0)
(s298 0)
(s299 0)
(s300 0)
(s301 0)
(s302 0)
(s303 0)
(s304 0)
(s305 0)
(s306 0)
(s307 0)
(s308 0)
(s309 0)
(s310 0)
(s311 1)
(s312 0)
(s313 0)
(s314 0)
(s315 0)
(s316 0)
(s317 0)
(s318 1)
(s319 0)
(s320 0)
(s321 0)
(s322 0)
(s323 0)
(s324 0)
(s325 0)
(s326 0)
(s327 0)
(s328 0)
(s329 0)
(s330 0)
(s331 0)
(s332 0)
(s333 0)
(s334 0)
(s335 0)
(s336 0)
(s337 0)
(s338 0)
(s339 0)
(s340 0)
(s341 0)
(s342 0)
(s343 0)
(s344 0)
(s345 0)
(s346 0)
(s347 0)
(s348 0)
(s349 0)
(s350 0)
(s351 0)
(s352 0)
(s353 1)
(s354 0)
(s355 0)
(s356 0)
(s357 0)
(s358 0)
(s359 0)
(s360 0)
(s361 0)
(s362 0)
(s363 0)
(s364 0)
(s365 0)
(s366 0)
(s367 0)
(s368 0)
(s369 1)
(s370 0)
(s371 0)
(s372 0)
(s373 0)
(s374 0)
(s375 0)
(s376 0)
(s377 0)
(s378 0)
(s379 0)
(s380 0)
(s381 0)
(s382 0)
(s383 0)
(s384 0)
(s385 1)
(s386 0)
(s387 0)
(s388 0)
(s389 0)
(s390 0)
(s391 0)
(s392 0)
(s393 0)
(s394 0)
(s395 0)
(s396 0)
(s397 0)
(s398 0)
(s399 0)
(s400 0)
(s401 timeout
1)
(s402 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 453/893 variables, and 172 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/453 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/439 constraints, Known Traps: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60097ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60100ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 453/482 places, 440/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60596 ms. Remains : 453/482 places, 440/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:59:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 440 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:59:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6641972197687203484.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1611418850893815955.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6641972197687203484.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1611418850893815955.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12089448845345342178.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12089448845345342178.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12089448845345342178.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12089448845345342178.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12089448845345342178.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:00:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:00:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 80 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 63 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15536070589092413309.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10000841954711989974.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15536070589092413309.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10000841954711989974.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.58627e+32,1.89287,69312,5268,18,137770,318,778,190802,42,631,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((AX(((i16.u20.p62==0)&&(i21.i0.i0.u130.p467==1))) + AG((i16.u20.p67!=0))) * (EF(AG((i21.i1.i0.u105.p373==0))) + AF(((i8.u116.p400==...325
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(EX(!(((i16.u20.p62==0)&&(i21.i0.i0.u130.p467==1))))) + !(E(TRUE U !((i16.u20.p67...738
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t144, t147, t170, t173, t183, t186, t243, t250, t272, t287, t294, t333, t425, t426, t428, t42...1052
(forward)formula 0,1,9.09655,326080,1,0,820152,318,6285,885524,214,631,2359853
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 457 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 457 transition count 448
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 457 transition count 444
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 450 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 450 transition count 437
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 448 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 448 transition count 435
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 447 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 447 transition count 434
Applied a total of 74 rules in 47 ms. Remains 447 /482 variables (removed 35) and now considering 434/473 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 434 rows 447 cols
[2025-05-30 18:00:17] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 158 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:00:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 317 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 478 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 433 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:00:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/447 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 153 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 152 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 136 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 143 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 133 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 137 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 120 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 115 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 115 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 18/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 138 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 8/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 153 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 94 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 1.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 1.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 1.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 1.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 1.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 1.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 1.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 1.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 1.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 1.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 1.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 1.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 0.0)
(s311 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 447/881 variables, and 104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/447 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/447 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 64/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 145 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 141 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 101 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 94 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 17/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 108 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 447/881 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/447 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/433 constraints, Known Traps: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60071ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 447/482 places, 434/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60599 ms. Remains : 447/482 places, 434/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 434 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3306239403384418164.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7372425677998931497.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3306239403384418164.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7372425677998931497.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10724395009922829599.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10724395009922829599.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10724395009922829599.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10724395009922829599.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10724395009922829599.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 85 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10796615171966404232.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11853606043252363393.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10796615171966404232.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11853606043252363393.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.34788e+32,1.06838,43992,8317,18,82563,299,745,119941,41,556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(AF((i24.u180.p569==1))) + (EX((i20.u111.p387==1)) * (i8.u48.p162==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(!(EG(!((i24.u180.p569==1))))) + (EX((i20.u111.p387==1)) * (i8.u48.p162==0))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t132, t142, t145, t168, t171, t181, t184, t215, t222, t268, t283, t290, t305, t312, t419, t42...969
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 167 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 167 transitions
Performed 167 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 167
Iterating post reduction 0 with 167 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 481 transition count 305
Reduce places removed 167 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 189 rules applied. Total rules applied 356 place count 314 transition count 283
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 304 transition count 281
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 302 transition count 280
Performed 59 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 59 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 302 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 489 place count 243 transition count 221
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 503 place count 229 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 229 transition count 207
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 229 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 16 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 533 place count 221 transition count 199
Performed 72 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 677 place count 149 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 686 place count 149 transition count 118
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 704 place count 140 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 705 place count 139 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 717 place count 130 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 720 place count 127 transition count 105
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 720 place count 127 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 732 place count 121 transition count 99
Applied a total of 732 rules in 90 ms. Remains 121 /482 variables (removed 361) and now considering 99/473 (removed 374) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 121 cols
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [52, 72, 92, 97, 102, 106, 110, 114, 120]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 126 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/482 places, 99/473 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 105 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 105 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 104 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 104 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 103 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 103 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 102 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 102 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 101 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 101 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 100 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 100 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 99 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 99 transition count 86
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 98 transition count 85
Applied a total of 28 rules in 53 ms. Remains 98 /112 variables (removed 14) and now considering 85/99 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 98 cols
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 98/482 places, 85/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 442 ms. Remains : 98/482 places, 85/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10716994596381240964.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10089954003926287528.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10716994596381240964.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10089954003926287528.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.70859e+09,0.025964,4788,2,481,5,3713,6,0,474,4752,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(EF(!(AF((p173==1)))) U !(AG((((p354==0)||(p153==1))||(p196==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p173==1)))))) U !(!(E(TRUE U !((((p354==0)||(p153==1))||(p196==1)))))...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t3, t79, t81, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inter...177
(forward)formula 0,0,3.35935,136564,1,0,626,781375,200,297,2839,894098,739
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 456 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 456 transition count 447
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 456 transition count 442
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 450 transition count 436
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 449 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 449 transition count 435
Applied a total of 71 rules in 60 ms. Remains 449 /482 variables (removed 33) and now considering 435/473 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 435 rows 449 cols
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 259 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 304 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 565 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 434 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/449 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 146 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 146 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 143 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 107 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 108 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 105 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30117ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30119ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 449/482 places, 435/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30747 ms. Remains : 449/482 places, 435/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 435 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13334370427585268098.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6201004361434676979.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13334370427585268098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6201004361434676979.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9168764337639528118.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9168764337639528118.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9168764337639528118.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9168764337639528118.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9168764337639528118.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 84 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17401158863355410484.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5763953275805110042.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17401158863355410484.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5763953275805110042.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77291e+32,5.40223,186480,15127,16,381277,296,715,561595,36,550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 457 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 457 transition count 448
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 457 transition count 444
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 450 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 450 transition count 437
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 449 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 449 transition count 436
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 448 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 448 transition count 435
Applied a total of 72 rules in 83 ms. Remains 448 /482 variables (removed 34) and now considering 435/473 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 435 rows 448 cols
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 283 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 436 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 434 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:03:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 158 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 128 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 116 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 130 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 124 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 113 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30116ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30119ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 448/482 places, 435/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30640 ms. Remains : 448/482 places, 435/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 435 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10153470622453577243.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3268502803324352914.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10153470622453577243.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3268502803324352914.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:04:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:04:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3771247832435201851.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3771247832435201851.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3771247832435201851.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3771247832435201851.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3771247832435201851.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 84 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16438933193104937922.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8523036325969646661.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16438933193104937922.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8523036325969646661.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.43583e+32,2.70571,89440,14261,18,173474,280,794,244177,44,552,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG(EF(((i7.i1.u29.p93==0)&&(i9.i0.u37.p126==1)))) + AG((EG(EX((i4.u147.p471==1))) + AX(((i25.i1.u186.p566==0)&&(i14.i0.u77.p294==1)))...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),E(TRUE U ((i7.i1.u29.p93==0)&&(i9.i0.u37.p126==1))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((EG(E...250
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t142, t145, t155, t158, t171, t181, t184, t197, t215, t222, t237, t259, t266, t281, t290, t31...1077
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 457 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 457 transition count 448
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 457 transition count 443
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 450 transition count 436
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 448 transition count 434
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 447 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 447 transition count 433
Applied a total of 75 rules in 46 ms. Remains 447 /482 variables (removed 35) and now considering 433/473 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 433 rows 447 cols
[2025-05-30 18:05:24] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 274 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:05:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 432 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 716 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 432 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:05:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/447 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 163 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 212 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 156 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 182 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 165 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 156 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 140 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 10/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 5/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 136 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 6/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 447/880 variables, and 81 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved in 30046 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/447 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 432/432 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/447 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 41/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 82 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 89 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 13/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 8/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 129 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 447/880 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/447 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/432 constraints, Known Traps: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60116ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60118ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 447/482 places, 433/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60881 ms. Remains : 447/482 places, 433/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 433 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3001683563494974147.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13716606164935275425.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3001683563494974147.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13716606164935275425.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12196181245801999474.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12196181245801999474.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12196181245801999474.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12196181245801999474.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12196181245801999474.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 83 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9673817723704416267.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:06:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15745394053798600172.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9673817723704416267.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15745394053798600172.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.62495e+32,3.13626,113356,11841,21,208639,270,771,359371,38,593,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((i23.i2.u105.p374==0)||(i6.i1.u17.p43==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((i23.i2.u105.p374==0)||(i6.i1.u17.p43==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t133, t143, t146, t156, t159, t172, t182, t185, t216, t223, t238, t245, t260, t267, t282, t28...1089
(forward)formula 0,0,26.3706,869072,1,0,2.31498e+06,270,4056,2.56467e+06,153,593,6331763
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 460 transition count 451
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 460 transition count 451
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 460 transition count 448
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 454 transition count 442
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 454 transition count 442
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 452 transition count 440
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 452 transition count 440
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 451 transition count 439
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 451 transition count 439
Applied a total of 65 rules in 63 ms. Remains 451 /482 variables (removed 31) and now considering 439/473 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 439 rows 451 cols
[2025-05-30 18:07:21] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 154 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:07:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 308 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 479 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 438 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:07:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/451 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 174 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 147 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 144 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 163 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 152 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 123 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 146 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 153 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 142 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 140 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 144 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 142 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 118 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 451/890 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/451 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 438/438 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/451 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 80/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 149 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 113 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 9/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 102 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 15/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 133 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 128 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 112 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 117 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 451/890 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/451 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/438 constraints, Known Traps: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60080ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60081ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 451/482 places, 439/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60625 ms. Remains : 451/482 places, 439/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 439 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2060455249979440601.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3845696084767820968.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2060455249979440601.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3845696084767820968.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1091222950186722470.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1091222950186722470.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1091222950186722470.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1091222950186722470.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1091222950186722470.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 78 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality481242943907990596.gal : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 18:08:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6110753091660893156.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality481242943907990596.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6110753091660893156.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.95618e+32,8.31634,271468,22503,23,527086,336,854,787366,46,678,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 456 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 456 transition count 447
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 456 transition count 442
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 449 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 449 transition count 435
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 447 transition count 433
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 447 transition count 433
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 446 transition count 432
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 446 transition count 432
Applied a total of 77 rules in 48 ms. Remains 446 /482 variables (removed 36) and now considering 432/473 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 432 rows 446 cols
[2025-05-30 18:09:22] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 194 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:09:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 246 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 462 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 431 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:09:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 178 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 155 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 145 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 172 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 136 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 148 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 10/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/878 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 431/431 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/446 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 45/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 99 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 12/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 8/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 139 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 7/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/878 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/446 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/431 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 431 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 446/482 places, 432/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60564 ms. Remains : 446/482 places, 432/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 432 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7083581971912243833.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8427644512594458191.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7083581971912243833.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8427644512594458191.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13067462511011165281.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13067462511011165281.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13067462511011165281.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13067462511011165281.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13067462511011165281.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 85 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16544098002040014759.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:10:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8973629606978060125.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16544098002040014759.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8973629606978060125.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.3597e+32,1.73215,65364,16886,20,120881,263,804,150731,35,568,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((i22.i1.u158.p499==0) * !(AX(((i19.i1.u108.p378==0)||(i21.i3.u178.p549==1)))))) U E(A(!((AF((i15.i0.u89.p327==1)) + (i16.i0.u95.p33...246
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(!((E(!(!(EG((i2.i1.u142.p459==1)))) U (!(!((!(EG(!((i15.i0.u89.p327==1)))) + (i16.i0.u95.p339...880
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t142, t145, t155, t158, t168, t171, t184, t215, t222, t244, t259, t266, t288, t310, t325, t41...1074
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 168 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 168 transitions
Performed 168 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 168
Iterating post reduction 0 with 168 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 481 transition count 304
Reduce places removed 168 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 191 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 313 transition count 281
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 303 transition count 280
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 302 transition count 280
Performed 59 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 59 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 302 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 489 place count 243 transition count 221
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 503 place count 229 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 229 transition count 207
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 229 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 535 place count 220 transition count 198
Performed 72 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 72 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 679 place count 148 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 688 place count 148 transition count 117
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 706 place count 139 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 707 place count 138 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 719 place count 129 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 722 place count 126 transition count 104
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 722 place count 126 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 734 place count 120 transition count 98
Applied a total of 734 rules in 50 ms. Remains 120 /482 variables (removed 362) and now considering 98/473 (removed 375) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 120 cols
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [51, 71, 91, 96, 101, 105, 110, 114, 119]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/482 places, 98/473 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 104 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 104 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 103 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 103 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 102 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 102 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 101 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 101 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 100 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 100 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 99 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 98 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 85
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 84
Applied a total of 28 rules in 22 ms. Remains 97 /111 variables (removed 14) and now considering 84/98 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 97 cols
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:11:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/482 places, 84/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 284 ms. Remains : 97/482 places, 84/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13044979701576590507.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality248597433285086925.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13044979701576590507.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality248597433285086925.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.43656e+09,0.03251,4776,2,457,5,3524,6,0,468,4925,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((EG(((p326==0)&&(p407==1))) * (p108==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((EG(((p326==0)&&(p407==1))) * (p108==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t77, t79, t80, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inte...178
(forward)formula 0,0,1.98539,78028,1,0,403,425468,201,203,2806,522626,497
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 167 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 167 transitions
Performed 167 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 167
Iterating post reduction 0 with 167 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 481 transition count 305
Reduce places removed 167 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 13 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 13 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 192 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 314 transition count 280
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 302 transition count 278
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 300 transition count 278
Performed 56 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 56 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 300 transition count 222
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 487 place count 244 transition count 222
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 501 place count 230 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 515 place count 230 transition count 208
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 515 place count 230 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 535 place count 220 transition count 198
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 677 place count 149 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 686 place count 149 transition count 118
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 704 place count 140 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 705 place count 139 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 719 place count 129 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 723 place count 125 transition count 104
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 723 place count 125 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 735 place count 119 transition count 98
Applied a total of 735 rules in 36 ms. Remains 119 /482 variables (removed 363) and now considering 98/473 (removed 375) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 119 cols
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [91, 96, 101, 105, 109, 113, 118]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/482 places, 98/473 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 107 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 107 transition count 93
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 104 transition count 90
Applied a total of 16 rules in 5 ms. Remains 104 /112 variables (removed 8) and now considering 90/98 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 104 cols
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 104/482 places, 90/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 238 ms. Remains : 104/482 places, 90/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1062537731079344405.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10017523561197438653.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1062537731079344405.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10017523561197438653.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.77697e+09,0.038962,5224,2,848,5,5088,6,0,502,6453,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((((p193==0)||(p432==1))&&((p407==0)||(p464==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((p193==0)||(p432==1))&&((p407==0)||(p464==1)))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 82/0/8
(forward)formula 0,0,0.666579,32220,1,0,9,136596,20,2,2467,174855,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-06b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 458 transition count 449
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 458 transition count 449
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 458 transition count 444
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 452 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 450 transition count 436
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 449 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 449 transition count 435
Applied a total of 71 rules in 47 ms. Remains 449 /482 variables (removed 33) and now considering 435/473 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 435 rows 449 cols
[2025-05-30 18:11:27] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:11:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 303 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 453 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 434 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:11:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/449 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 151 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 145 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 17/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 116 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 150 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 7/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 449/884 variables, and 104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/449 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 434/434 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/449 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 64/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 143 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 148 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 114 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 110 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 102 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 91 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 101 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 108 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 114 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 113 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 113 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 104 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 112 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 111 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 103 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 111 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 111 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 104 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 103 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60083ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60085ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 449/482 places, 435/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60587 ms. Remains : 449/482 places, 435/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 435 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17603444119564474207.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5004729148281773202.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17603444119564474207.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5004729148281773202.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2243850142322189678.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2243850142322189678.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2243850142322189678.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2243850142322189678.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2243850142322189678.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 86 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16033655202836569702.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:12:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8902891343933407443.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16033655202836569702.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8902891343933407443.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.28622e+32,2.249,77072,10385,14,151217,256,722,224780,30,491,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG((AF((i22.u143.p433==1)) + (((i12.u65.p228==0)&&(i18.u97.p347==1))&&(i27.i0.i0.u183.p560==1))))) + AF((i25.u171.p530==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EX(!(EG((!(EG(!((i22.u143.p433==1)))) + (((i12.u65.p228==0)&&(i18.u97.p347==1))&&(i27.i0.i0.u1...206
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t131, t134, t144, t147, t157, t160, t183, t186, t217, t262, t269, t284, t291, t306, t328, t42...1014
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 457 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 457 transition count 448
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 457 transition count 443
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 450 transition count 436
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 448 transition count 434
Applied a total of 73 rules in 32 ms. Remains 448 /482 variables (removed 34) and now considering 434/473 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 434 rows 448 cols
[2025-05-30 18:13:27] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 215 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:13:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 287 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 518 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 433 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:13:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 147 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 161 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 141 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 160 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 147 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 18/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 115 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 448/882 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 75/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 9/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 7/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 448/882 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/433 constraints, Known Traps: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60062ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 448/482 places, 434/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60623 ms. Remains : 448/482 places, 434/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 434 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7624343608028012676.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9075729016375193636.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7624343608028012676.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9075729016375193636.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8858237342127032638.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8858237342127032638.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8858237342127032638.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8858237342127032638.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8858237342127032638.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 84 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16646571472356870824.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:14:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18199063714510737036.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16646571472356870824.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18199063714510737036.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.82304e+32,4.51968,176236,21741,16,349220,287,723,564134,37,546,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 457 transition count 448
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 457 transition count 448
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 457 transition count 443
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 451 transition count 437
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 451 transition count 437
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 449 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 449 transition count 435
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 448 transition count 434
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 448 transition count 434
Applied a total of 73 rules in 37 ms. Remains 448 /482 variables (removed 34) and now considering 434/473 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 434 rows 448 cols
[2025-05-30 18:15:28] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:15:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 330 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 554 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 433 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:15:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 154 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 131 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 129 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 1.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 1.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 1.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 1.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 1.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 1.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 1.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 1.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 1.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 1.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 1.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 1.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 1.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 0.0)
(s311 0.0)
(s312 0.0)
(s313 0.0)
(s314 1.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 0.0)
(s318 0.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 0.0)
(s321 0.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 0.0)
(s326 0.0)
(s327 0.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 0.0)
(s330 0.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 0.0)
(s333 0.0)
(s334 0.0)
(s335 0.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 0.0)
(s338 0.0)
(s339 0.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 0.0)
(s342 0.0)
(s343 0.0)
(s344 0.0)
(s345 0.0)
(s346 0.0)
(s347 0.0)
(s348 0.0)
(s349 1.0)
(s350 0.0)
(s351 0.0)
(s352 0.0)
(s353 0.0)
(s354 0.0)
(s355 0.0)
(s356 0.0)
(s357 0.0)
(s358 0.0)
(s359 0.0)
(s360 0.0)
(s361 0.0)
(s362 0.0)
(s363 0.0)
(s364 0.0)
(s365 0.0)
(s366 0.0)
(s367 0.0)
(s368 0.0)
(s369 1.0)
(s370 0.0)
(s371 0.0)
(s372 0.0)
(s373 0.0)
(s374 0.0)
(s375 0.0)
(s376 0.0)
(s377 0.0)
(s378 0.0)
(s379 0.0)
(s380 0.0)
(s381 1.0)
(s382 0.0)
(s383 0.0)
(s384 0.0)
(s385 0.0)
(s386 0.0)
(s387 0.0)
(s388 0.0)
(s389 0.0)
(s390 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 448/882 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 433/433 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/448 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 83/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 110 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 96 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 96 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 98 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 91 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 20/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 102 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 448/882 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/448 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/433 constraints, Known Traps: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 433 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 448/482 places, 434/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60652 ms. Remains : 448/482 places, 434/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 434 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4837068163114280395.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14580347278593393652.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4837068163114280395.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14580347278593393652.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13858551072673163171.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13858551072673163171.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13858551072673163171.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13858551072673163171.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13858551072673163171.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 82 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2217069783620949201.gal : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 18:16:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14850291155395828539.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2217069783620949201.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14850291155395828539.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.58739e+32,1.77717,58480,14040,16,102504,282,772,172514,35,476,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((EG(((i16.u0.p0==0)||(i13.u77.p295==1))) * AX((i11.u66.p242==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((EG(((i16.u0.p0==0)||(i13.u77.p295==1))) * !(EX(!((i11.u66.p242==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t143, t146, t156, t159, t182, t217, t239, t246, t268, t283, t290, t305, t312, t419, t420, t42...1011
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 473/473 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 458 transition count 449
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 458 transition count 449
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 458 transition count 444
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 452 transition count 438
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 452 transition count 438
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 450 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 450 transition count 436
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 449 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 449 transition count 435
Applied a total of 71 rules in 54 ms. Remains 449 /482 variables (removed 33) and now considering 435/473 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 435 rows 449 cols
[2025-05-30 18:17:29] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:17:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 315 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 516 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 434 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:17:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/449 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 175 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 148 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 138 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 150 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 161 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 152 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 148 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 146 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 148 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 144 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 124 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 140 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 142 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 449/884 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved in 30056 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/449 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 434/434 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/449 variables, 39/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 80/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 18/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 96 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 5/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 435/884 variables, 449/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/884 variables, 434/1046 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 884/884 variables, and 1046 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 449/449 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 434/434 constraints, Known Traps: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60129ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 434 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60130ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 449/482 places, 435/473 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60702 ms. Remains : 449/482 places, 435/473 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:18:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 435 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:18:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18377025176022348631.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 18:18:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15574376942433352449.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18377025176022348631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15574376942433352449.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13780448308845560463.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13780448308845560463.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13780448308845560463.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13780448308845560463.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13780448308845560463.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 87 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2172286049865464557.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:19:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9734447043428871625.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2172286049865464557.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9734447043428871625.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.12805e+32,3.72569,124136,16832,19,231468,285,725,375530,36,499,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4484083977782934912.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4484083977782934912.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4484083977782934912.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4484083977782934912.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4484083977782934912.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 74 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15558341856481300702.gal : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 18:19:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14568349968887163695.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15558341856481300702.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14568349968887163695.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.68624e+33,58.1066,1575288,81324,32,2.70646e+06,447,918,6.1326e+06,58,1261,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(AF((i27.i1.i2.u196.p569==1))) + (EX((i20.u119.p387==1)) * (i9.u46.p162==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(!(EG(!((i27.i1.i2.u196.p569==1))))) + (EX((i20.u119.p387==1)) * (i9.u46.p162==0))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t143, t146, t170, t173, t184, t187, t214, t269, t286, t295, t347, t364, t457, t458, t459, t46...1326
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:47:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:47:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2025-05-30 18:47:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:47:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:47:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:47:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 186 ms
[2025-05-30 18:47:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 653 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16877827986230458494.gal : 36 ms
[2025-05-30 18:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2214020923824530433.ctl : 16 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16877827986230458494.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2214020923824530433.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-06b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729500529"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-06b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-06b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;