Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400516.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400516
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748626834158

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:40:35] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:40:35] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:40:35] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 90 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:35] [INFO ] Transformed 482 places.
[2025-05-30 17:40:35] [INFO ] Transformed 480 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:40:35] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:40:35] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 482 places and 480 transitions and 1120 arcs in 190 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 39 out of 482 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 480/480 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 426 transition count 424
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 426 transition count 424
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 426 transition count 415
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 406 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 406 transition count 395
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 403 transition count 392
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 403 transition count 392
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 401 transition count 390
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 401 transition count 390
Applied a total of 171 rules in 148 ms. Remains 401 /482 variables (removed 81) and now considering 390/480 (removed 90) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 390 rows 401 cols
[2025-05-30 17:40:35] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 24 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 331 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:40:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 302 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 665 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 389 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:40:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/401 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 84 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 130 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 88 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 107 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 5/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 401/791 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/401 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 389/389 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/401 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 88/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 102 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 10/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 9/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 2/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 10/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 390/791 variables, 401/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 389/943 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 90 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 791/791 variables, and 946 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 401/401 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 389/389 constraints, Known Traps: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60121ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 389 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60132ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 401/482 places, 390/480 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60963 ms. Remains : 401/482 places, 390/480 transitions.
Support contains 39 out of 401 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 390 transitions.
Support contains 37 out of 401 places (down from 39) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (160 resets) in 1714 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 5/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (14 resets) in 198 ms. (201 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (13 resets) in 191 ms. (208 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (15 resets) in 181 ms. (219 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (15 resets) in 147 ms. (270 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 144 ms. (275 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-05-30 17:41:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 95/100 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 273/373 variables, 29/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/401 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 390/791 variables, 401/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/791 variables, 0/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 791/791 variables, and 435 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 401/401 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 95/100 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 273/373 variables, 29/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 28/401 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 93 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 5/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 390/791 variables, 401/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 5/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 1/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 1/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/791 variables, 0/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/791 variables, 0/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 791/791 variables, and 451 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 1907 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 401/401 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2239ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 1017 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 140 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 140 transitions
Performed 140 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 140
Iterating post reduction 0 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 401 transition count 250
Reduce places removed 140 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 261 transition count 234
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 251 transition count 234
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 251 transition count 183
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 200 transition count 183
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 416 place count 192 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 424 place count 192 transition count 175
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 424 place count 192 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 189 transition count 172
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 572 place count 118 transition count 91
Free-agglomeration rule applied 20 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 592 place count 118 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 612 place count 98 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 613 place count 97 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 4 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 659 place count 76 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 684 place count 51 transition count 45
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 684 place count 51 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 714 place count 36 transition count 30
Applied a total of 714 rules in 53 ms. Remains 36 /401 variables (removed 365) and now considering 30/390 (removed 360) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 53 ms. Remains : 36/401 places, 30/390 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 166 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 107 stabilizing places and 107 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X((F(p0)&&X(p1)))&&F(p2)))'
Support contains 3 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 386 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 386 transition count 375
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 386 transition count 374
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 379 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 379 transition count 367
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 377 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 377 transition count 365
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 376 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 376 transition count 364
Applied a total of 51 rules in 51 ms. Remains 376 /401 variables (removed 25) and now considering 364/390 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 364 rows 376 cols
[2025-05-30 17:41:41] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:41:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 224 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 341 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 363 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:41:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/376 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 18/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 364/740 variables, 376/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 6/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 740/740 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 376/376 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 363/363 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/376 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 64/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 5/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 14/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 376/740 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/376 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/363 constraints, Known Traps: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60067ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 376/401 places, 364/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60463 ms. Remains : 376/401 places, 364/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 396 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p2), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), true]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-00 finished in 60939 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0&&X(X(X((X(p2)||p1)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 388 transition count 377
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 388 transition count 377
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 388 transition count 376
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 382 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 382 transition count 370
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 380 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 380 transition count 368
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 379 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 379 transition count 367
Applied a total of 45 rules in 55 ms. Remains 379 /401 variables (removed 22) and now considering 367/390 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 367 rows 379 cols
[2025-05-30 17:42:42] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:42:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 237 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 364 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 366 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:42:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 16/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 11/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 379/746 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 366/366 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 90/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 7/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 4/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 3/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 379/746 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/366 constraints, Known Traps: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 379/401 places, 367/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60484 ms. Remains : 379/401 places, 367/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 737 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 560 reset in 251 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 561 reset in 234 ms.
Computed a total of 93 stabilizing places and 93 stable transitions
Computed a total of 93 stabilizing places and 93 stable transitions
Detected a total of 93/379 stabilizing places and 93/367 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 147 ms. Reduced automaton from 16 states, 32 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 16 states, 32 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 729 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (159 resets) in 351 ms. (113 steps per ms) remains 2/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (15 resets) in 235 ms. (169 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (13 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-05-30 17:43:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 74/77 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 274/351 variables, 27/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 367/746 variables, 379/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/746 variables, 0/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/746 variables, 0/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 746/746 variables, and 413 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 201 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 379/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem apf2 is UNSAT
Problem apf4 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 77/746 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 36 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 242ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 2 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (G (OR p2 p0)), (G (OR p2 p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 553 ms. Reduced automaton from 16 states, 32 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 16 states, 24 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 702 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 725 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
[2025-05-30 17:43:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:43:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:43:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 635 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:43:48] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:43:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:43:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 268 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-30 17:43:48] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 117 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 366/521/366 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 17 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:43:51] [INFO ] Added : 315 causal constraints over 63 iterations in 2301 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 3 out of 379 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 379/379 places, 367/367 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 379 /379 variables (removed 0) and now considering 367/367 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:43:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:43:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 229 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 351 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 366 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:43:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 131 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 16/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 11/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 1.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 1.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 1.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 1.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 1.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 1.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 1.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 1.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 1.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 1.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 1.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 1.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 1.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 0.0)
(s311 0.0)
(s312 1.0)
(s313 0.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 0.0)
(s318 0.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 0.0)
(s321 0.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 0.0)
timeout
(s326 0.0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 379/746 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 366/366 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 90/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 7/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 4/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 3/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 379/746 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/366 constraints, Known Traps: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60050ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60409 ms. Remains : 379/379 places, 367/367 transitions.
Computed a total of 93 stabilizing places and 93 stable transitions
Computed a total of 93 stabilizing places and 93 stable transitions
Detected a total of 93/379 stabilizing places and 93/367 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 165 ms. Reduced automaton from 16 states, 24 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 16 states, 24 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 751 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 20366 steps (80 resets) in 73 ms. (275 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F (NOT (OR p2 p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT p2))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 416 ms. Reduced automaton from 16 states, 24 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 16 states, 24 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 713 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 702 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
[2025-05-30 17:44:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:44:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:44:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 671 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:44:55] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:44:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:44:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 280 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-30 17:44:55] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 111 ms
[2025-05-30 17:44:55] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 366/521/366 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 18 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:44:58] [INFO ] Added : 315 causal constraints over 63 iterations in 2217 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 725 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 561 reset in 159 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 560 reset in 174 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 696 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 3 out of 379 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 379/379 places, 367/367 transitions.
Performed 118 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 379 transition count 367
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 379 transition count 363
Performed 50 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 50 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 379 transition count 366
Deduced a syphon composed of 172 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 379 transition count 366
Discarding 93 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 93 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 286 transition count 273
Deduced a syphon composed of 79 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 93 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 286 transition count 273
Performed 87 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 9 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 166 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 286 transition count 264
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 505 place count 230 transition count 208
Deduced a syphon composed of 110 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 561 place count 230 transition count 208
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -15
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 562 place count 230 transition count 223
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 564 place count 228 transition count 219
Deduced a syphon composed of 109 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 566 place count 228 transition count 219
Deduced a syphon composed of 109 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 567 place count 228 transition count 218
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 110 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 568 place count 228 transition count 218
Deduced a syphon composed of 110 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 568 rules in 81 ms. Remains 228 /379 variables (removed 151) and now considering 218/367 (removed 149) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 7 ms returned []
Running 216 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 228 cols
[2025-05-30 17:45:00] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/228 variables, 32/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD128 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD187 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD192 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD199 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD200 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 78 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 15/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 218/446 variables, 228/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 35/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/446 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/446 variables, and 332 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved in 8664 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 228/228 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 107/224 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 35/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/228 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 218/446 variables, 228/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 35/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 91/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/446 variables, and 426 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 228/228 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/216 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 38720ms problems are : Problem set: 125 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 125 dead transitions in 38722ms
Found 125 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 125 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 125 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 228/379 places, 93/367 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 301 edges and 228 vertex of which 118 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 110 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 110 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 118 /228 variables (removed 110) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 118/379 places, 93/367 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 38824 ms. Remains : 118/379 places, 93/367 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin14379962992777314662
[2025-05-30 17:45:38] [INFO ] Built C files in 23ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin14379962992777314662
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14379962992777314662;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 656 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14379962992777314662;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 50 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin14379962992777314662;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased14641304785528913407.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 3 out of 379 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 379/379 places, 367/367 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 379 /379 variables (removed 0) and now considering 367/367 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 367 rows 379 cols
[2025-05-30 17:45:54] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:45:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:45:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 231 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 357 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 366 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:45:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 79 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 80 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 16/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 11/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 379/746 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 366/366 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 90/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 7/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 4/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 3/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 379/746 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/366 constraints, Known Traps: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60057ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60431 ms. Remains : 379/379 places, 367/367 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6805289875897210893
[2025-05-30 17:46:54] [INFO ] Built C files in 13ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6805289875897210893
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6805289875897210893;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 539 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6805289875897210893;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 38 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6805289875897210893;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased6864919735715649997.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 17:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL17193250502913810547.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL17065398208299616971.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL17193250502913810547.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut11501125110450115843.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL17065398208299616971.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...320
Loading property file /tmp/LTL17065398208299616971.prop.
Loaded 3 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut11501125110450115843.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:47:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL8346085348534856797.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL436388083043117325.ltl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL8346085348534856797.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL436388083043117325.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...274
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F(("(p23==1)")&&(X(X(X(("(((p229==0)&&(p39==0))||(p39==1))")||(X("(p23==0)")))))))))
Formula 0 simplified : G(!"(p23==1)" | XXX(!"(((p229==0)&&(p39==0))||(p39==1))" & X!"(p23==0)"))
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8007866124780247286.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8007866124780247286.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8007866124780247286.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8007866124780247286.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8007866124780247286.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:47:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:47:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:47:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 75 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:47:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:47:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14002780900762390444.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL4495154282437135402.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14002780900762390444.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL4495154282437135402.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F(("(i2.i0.u9.p23==1)")&&(X(X(X(("(((i12.i0.u64.p229==0)&&(i4.u15.p39==0))||(i4.u15.p39==1))")||(X("(i2.i0.u9.p23==0)")))))))))
Formula 0 simplified : G(!"(i2.i0.u9.p23==1)" | XXX(!"(((i12.i0.u64.p229==0)&&(i4.u15.p39==0))||(i4.u15.p39==1))" & X!"(i2.i0.u9.p23==0)"))
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t118, t121, t144, t147, t172, t175, t205, t220, t227, t252, t297, t377, t378, t379, t380, t38...926
Computing Next relation with stutter on 800 deadlock states
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-01 finished in 312702 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((G(p0)||((p1 U (p2 U p0))&&X(X(p2)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 386 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 386 transition count 375
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 386 transition count 374
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 378 transition count 366
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 376 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 376 transition count 364
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 375 transition count 363
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 375 transition count 363
Applied a total of 53 rules in 37 ms. Remains 375 /401 variables (removed 26) and now considering 363/390 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 363 rows 375 cols
[2025-05-30 17:47:55] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:47:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:47:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 256 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 380 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 362 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:47:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 375/738 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 85/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 11/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 363/738 variables, 375/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 362/887 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 108 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 738/738 variables, and 896 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 375/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60469 ms. Remains : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 512 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 244 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-02 finished in 61032 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 140 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 140 transitions
Performed 140 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 140
Iterating post reduction 0 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 400 transition count 249
Reduce places removed 140 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 153 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 260 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 252 transition count 236
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 252 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 201 transition count 185
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 413 place count 191 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 191 transition count 175
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 191 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 186 transition count 170
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 117 transition count 91
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 573 place count 116 transition count 91
Applied a total of 573 rules in 30 ms. Remains 116 /401 variables (removed 285) and now considering 91/390 (removed 299) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 116 cols
[2025-05-30 17:48:56] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned [38, 42, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 67, 84, 90, 96, 102, 108, 115]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 97 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/401 places, 91/390 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 101 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 94 transition count 84
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 88 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 88 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 87 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 87 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 86 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 86 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 85 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 85 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 84 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 84 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 83 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 83 transition count 73
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 82 transition count 72
Applied a total of 38 rules in 14 ms. Remains 82 /101 variables (removed 19) and now considering 72/91 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 82 cols
[2025-05-30 17:48:56] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:48:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:48:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 82/401 places, 72/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 279 ms. Remains : 82/401 places, 72/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4824 reset in 186 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 69804 steps with 3382 reset with depth 19 and stack size 19 in 141 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-03 finished in 718 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(F((p0&&X(X(p0)))))||(F((p0&&X(X(p0))))&&(p1 U (p2||G(p1)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 387 transition count 376
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 387 transition count 376
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 387 transition count 375
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 380 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 380 transition count 368
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 379 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 379 transition count 367
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 378 transition count 366
Applied a total of 47 rules in 59 ms. Remains 378 /401 variables (removed 23) and now considering 366/390 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 366 rows 378 cols
[2025-05-30 17:48:57] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:48:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 254 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 378 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 365 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:48:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 14/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 744/744 variables, and 488 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 76/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 11/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 18/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 10/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 6/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 378/744 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/365 constraints, Known Traps: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60055ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 378/401 places, 366/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60496 ms. Remains : 378/401 places, 366/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 261 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25084 reset in 128 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24989 reset in 227 ms.
Computed a total of 94 stabilizing places and 94 stable transitions
Computed a total of 94 stabilizing places and 94 stable transitions
Detected a total of 94/378 stabilizing places and 94/366 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 16 factoid took 160 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 186 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 7 to 6
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (160 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 1/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (13 resets) in 275 ms. (144 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:49:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 80/83 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 267/350 variables, 30/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/378 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 0/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/744 variables, 0/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 744/744 variables, and 416 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 598 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 80/83 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 267/350 variables, 30/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/378 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 4/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 1/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/744 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 744/744 variables, and 421 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 621 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1223ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 153 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 9 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0))), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 16 factoid took 474 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 237 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 274 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 4 out of 378 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 366/366 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 378 /378 variables (removed 0) and now considering 366/366 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:50:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:50:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 216 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 336 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 365 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:50:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 14/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30072ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30073ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30430 ms. Remains : 378/378 places, 366/366 transitions.
Computed a total of 94 stabilizing places and 94 stable transitions
Computed a total of 94 stabilizing places and 94 stable transitions
Detected a total of 94/378 stabilizing places and 94/366 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0)), (X p0), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 16 factoid took 164 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 241 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 7 to 6
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (160 resets) in 87 ms. (454 steps per ms) remains 1/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (13 resets) in 28 ms. (1379 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:50:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 80/83 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 267/350 variables, 30/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/378 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 0/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/744 variables, 0/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 744/744 variables, and 416 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 602 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 80/83 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 267/350 variables, 30/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/378 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 4/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 1/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/744 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 744/744 variables, and 421 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 594 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1201ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 153 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 1 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0)), (X p0), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 16 factoid took 439 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 261 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 259 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 252 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25063 reset in 131 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25031 reset in 122 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin4741051386660088470
[2025-05-30 17:50:34] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin4741051386660088470
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4741051386660088470;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 528 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4741051386660088470;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 33 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin4741051386660088470;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1920644374931796577.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 4 out of 378 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 366/366 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 378 /378 variables (removed 0) and now considering 366/366 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:50:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:50:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 236 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 356 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 365 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:50:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 14/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 744/744 variables, and 489 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 77/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 2/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 3/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 10/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/524 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 365/889 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 744/744 variables, and 895 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60430 ms. Remains : 378/378 places, 366/366 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15461946930744699383
[2025-05-30 17:51:50] [INFO ] Built C files in 11ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15461946930744699383
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15461946930744699383;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 533 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15461946930744699383;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 34 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15461946930744699383;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased13924259833368558259.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 17:52:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL6722623256228677568.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL837355267172123261.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL6722623256228677568.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut18058167864629421983.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL837355267172123261.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...317
Loading property file /tmp/LTL837355267172123261.prop.
Loaded 3 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut18058167864629421983.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:52:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2628990041522420966.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL16590055717252736123.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL2628990041522420966.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL16590055717252736123.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G(F(("(p191!=1)")&&(X(X("(p191!=1)"))))))||((F(("(p191!=1)")&&(X(X("(p191!=1)")))))&&(("(p64==1)")U(("((!((p42==1)&&(p382==1)))&...190
Formula 0 simplified : G(FG(!"(p191!=1)" | XX!"(p191!=1)") & (G(!"(p191!=1)" | XX!"(p191!=1)") | (!"(p64==1)" M !"((!((p42==1)&&(p382==1)))&&(p64==1))")))
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5743162482847368169.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5743162482847368169.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5743162482847368169.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5743162482847368169.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5743162482847368169.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 71 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL4091205148749165815.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL5600287001091425856.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL4091205148749165815.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL5600287001091425856.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...254
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G(F(("(i10.u53.p191!=1)")&&(X(X("(i10.u53.p191!=1)"))))))||((F(("(i10.u53.p191!=1)")&&(X(X("(i10.u53.p191!=1)")))))&&(("(i5.u17....264
Formula 0 simplified : G(FG(!"(i10.u53.p191!=1)" | XX!"(i10.u53.p191!=1)") & (G(!"(i10.u53.p191!=1)" | XX!"(i10.u53.p191!=1)") | (!"(i5.u17.p64==1)" M !"((...221
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t118, t121, t144, t147, t172, t175, t205, t220, t245, t252, t278, t297, t377, t378, t379, t38...936
Computing Next relation with stutter on 800 deadlock states
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-04 finished in 233564 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(G(p0))||(p0&&F(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 386 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 386 transition count 375
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 386 transition count 374
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 378 transition count 366
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 376 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 376 transition count 364
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 375 transition count 363
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 375 transition count 363
Applied a total of 53 rules in 36 ms. Remains 375 /401 variables (removed 26) and now considering 363/390 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 363 rows 375 cols
[2025-05-30 17:52:50] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:52:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 238 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 364 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 362 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:52:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 375/738 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 86/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 72 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 8/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 2/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 363/738 variables, 375/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 738/738 variables, and 887 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 375/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60459 ms. Remains : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 138 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 242 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-05 finished in 60619 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 141 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 141 transitions
Performed 141 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 141
Iterating post reduction 0 with 141 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 400 transition count 248
Reduce places removed 141 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 157 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 259 transition count 232
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 249 transition count 232
Performed 48 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 48 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 249 transition count 184
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 201 transition count 184
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 414 place count 191 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 424 place count 191 transition count 174
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 424 place count 191 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 434 place count 186 transition count 169
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 574 place count 116 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 575 place count 115 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 584 place count 108 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 106 transition count 86
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 106 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 596 place count 101 transition count 81
Applied a total of 596 rules in 41 ms. Remains 101 /401 variables (removed 300) and now considering 81/390 (removed 309) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 101 cols
[2025-05-30 17:53:51] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned [42, 59, 76, 81, 85, 90, 94, 100]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 124 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/401 places, 81/390 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 87 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 87 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 86 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 86 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 85 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 85 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 84 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 84 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 83 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 83 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 82 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 82 transition count 70
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 81 transition count 69
Applied a total of 24 rules in 11 ms. Remains 81 /93 variables (removed 12) and now considering 69/81 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 81 cols
[2025-05-30 17:53:51] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:53:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:53:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 81/401 places, 69/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 350 ms. Remains : 81/401 places, 69/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 57 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4168 reset in 229 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4168 reset in 262 ms.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Detected a total of 5/81 stabilizing places and 3/69 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 446 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 882 steps (30 resets) in 6 ms. (126 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 476 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 63 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 3 out of 81 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 69/69 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 69/69 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:53:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:53:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:53:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:53:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:53:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/81 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/150 variables, 81/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1134 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/81 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/150 variables, 81/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 40/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 946 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2097ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2278 ms. Remains : 81/81 places, 69/69 transitions.
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 5 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Detected a total of 5/81 stabilizing places and 3/69 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 519 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 802 steps (27 resets) in 6 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 542 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 60 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 54 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4180 reset in 155 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4181 reset in 158 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15874357874555217670
[2025-05-30 17:53:57] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 69 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:53:57] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:53:57] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 69 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:53:57] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:53:57] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 69 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:53:57] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:53:57] [INFO ] Built C files in 11ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15874357874555217670
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15874357874555217670;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 278 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15874357874555217670;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 45 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15874357874555217670;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased12701561566805919527.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 3 out of 81 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 69/69 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 69/69 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:54:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:54:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:54:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:54:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:54:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/81 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/150 variables, 81/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1086 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/81 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/150 variables, 81/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 40/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 982 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2073ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2225 ms. Remains : 81/81 places, 69/69 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin12475524717153404025
[2025-05-30 17:54:14] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 69 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:54:14] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:54:14] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 69 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:54:14] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:54:14] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 69 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:54:14] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:54:14] [INFO ] Built C files in 7ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin12475524717153404025
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12475524717153404025;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 165 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12475524717153404025;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 34 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin12475524717153404025;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15895129691166179956.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 17:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL13637245796159276317.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL14774828279705741644.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL13637245796159276317.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut18039062580804439171.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL14774828279705741644.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...320
Loading property file /tmp/LTL14774828279705741644.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut18039062580804439171.hoa
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t177, t310.t306.t349.t307.t305.t30.t116.t379.t31, t258.t254.t353.t255.t253.t30.t116.t379.t31,...253
Computing Next relation with stutter on 1216 deadlock states
3 unique states visited
3 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
3 items max in DFS search stack
13 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.135945,21252,1,0,254,30335,178,164,2314,37036,408
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE HOA DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-07 finished in 38668 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 140 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 140 transitions
Performed 140 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 140
Iterating post reduction 0 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 400 transition count 249
Reduce places removed 140 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 260 transition count 233
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 250 transition count 233
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 250 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 199 transition count 182
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 418 place count 189 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 189 transition count 172
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 189 transition count 167
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 184 transition count 167
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 574 place count 116 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 575 place count 115 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 107 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 589 place count 104 transition count 85
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 589 place count 104 transition count 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 599 place count 99 transition count 80
Applied a total of 599 rules in 23 ms. Remains 99 /401 variables (removed 302) and now considering 80/390 (removed 310) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 99 cols
[2025-05-30 17:54:29] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [39, 56, 80, 84, 89, 93, 98]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/401 places, 80/390 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 87 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 87 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 86 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 72
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 70
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 68
Applied a total of 24 rules in 6 ms. Remains 80 /92 variables (removed 12) and now considering 68/80 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 80 cols
[2025-05-30 17:54:29] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:54:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:54:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/401 places, 68/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 80/401 places, 68/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4184 reset in 130 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 24816 steps with 1042 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 39 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-08 finished in 426 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X((G(p0)&&F(p1)&&X(p2))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 389 transition count 378
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 389 transition count 378
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 389 transition count 377
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 383 transition count 371
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 383 transition count 371
Applied a total of 37 rules in 24 ms. Remains 383 /401 variables (removed 18) and now considering 371/390 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 371 rows 383 cols
[2025-05-30 17:54:30] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:54:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 251 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 382 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 370 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:54:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 13/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 16/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 383/754 variables, and 107 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 370/370 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 73/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 6/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 12/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 15/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 5/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 371/754 variables, 383/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/754 variables, 370/918 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 754/754 variables, and 918 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 370/370 constraints, Known Traps: 131/131 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 383/401 places, 371/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60464 ms. Remains : 383/401 places, 371/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 307 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p0 (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-09 finished in 60796 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((X(p0)||G((p1&&X(X(X(G(p2))))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 388 transition count 377
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 388 transition count 377
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 388 transition count 376
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 381 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 381 transition count 369
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 379 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 379 transition count 367
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 378 transition count 366
Applied a total of 47 rules in 39 ms. Remains 378 /401 variables (removed 23) and now considering 366/390 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 366 rows 378 cols
[2025-05-30 17:55:31] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:55:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 237 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 357 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 365 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:55:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 18/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 17/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30035ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30036ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 378/401 places, 366/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30433 ms. Remains : 378/401 places, 366/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 309 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 5 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-10 finished in 30766 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((((F(G(p0))&&F(p1)) U p2) U (F(p3)||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 389 transition count 378
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 389 transition count 378
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 389 transition count 377
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 382 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 382 transition count 370
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 380 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 380 transition count 368
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 379 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 379 transition count 367
Applied a total of 45 rules in 36 ms. Remains 379 /401 variables (removed 22) and now considering 367/390 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 367 rows 379 cols
[2025-05-30 17:56:01] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:56:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 242 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 366 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 366 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:56:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 367/746 variables, 379/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 746/746 variables, and 476 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 379/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 366/366 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 63/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 7/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 12/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 367/746 variables, 379/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/746 variables, 366/862 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 746/746 variables, and 862 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 379/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 366/366 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 366 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 379/401 places, 367/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60456 ms. Remains : 379/401 places, 367/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 243 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1125 reset in 147 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1136 reset in 164 ms.
Computed a total of 92 stabilizing places and 92 stable transitions
Computed a total of 92 stabilizing places and 92 stable transitions
Detected a total of 92/379 stabilizing places and 92/367 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/4 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p3)), (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1))), (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p3) (G (NOT p3))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 22 factoid took 170 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 14 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 18 states, 68 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 653 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (160 resets) in 407 ms. (98 steps per ms) remains 16/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
[2025-05-30 17:57:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Problem apf6 is UNSAT
Problem apf15 is UNSAT
Problem apf17 is UNSAT
Problem apf24 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 69/73 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 12 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem apf9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem apf18 is UNSAT
Problem apf4 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 278/351 variables, 30/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 28/379 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 4/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 367/746 variables, 379/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/746 variables, 1/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/746 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/746 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 746/746 variables, and 421 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved in 1902 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 379/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 69/73 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 278/351 variables, 30/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 28/379 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 5/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 367/746 variables, 379/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/746 variables, 9/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/746 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/746 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 746/746 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved in 1117 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 379/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/16 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3056ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 9 unsolved
Fused 9 Parikh solutions to 5 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 12678 steps, including 46 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=551 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 9 properties in 279 ms.
Found 7 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p3)), (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1))), (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p3) (G (NOT p3)))), (G (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2 p0)), (G (OR p1 (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p1) p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0)), (G (OR p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p3 p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (F p0), (F p2), (F p3), (F (NOT (OR p1 p3 (NOT p2) p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p3 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p3 p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p3 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p3 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p3 (NOT p2) p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p3) p2 p0))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p3))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 29 factoid took 873 ms. Reduced automaton from 18 states, 68 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 18 states, 61 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 701 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p2), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 684 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p2), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
[2025-05-30 17:57:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 888 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:10] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 473 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-30 17:57:11] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 138 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 366/521/366 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 17 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:57:13] [INFO ] Added : 301 causal constraints over 61 iterations in 2115 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))
[2025-05-30 17:57:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 905 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:14] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 458 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-30 17:57:15] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 146 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:15] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 366/521/366 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 18 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:57:18] [INFO ] Added : 344 causal constraints over 69 iterations in 2637 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))
[2025-05-30 17:57:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1045 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:19] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 492 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-30 17:57:20] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 144 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:20] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 366/521/366 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 17 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:57:22] [INFO ] Added : 346 causal constraints over 70 iterations in 2716 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))
Support contains 4 out of 379 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 379/379 places, 367/367 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 129 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 129 transitions
Performed 129 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 129
Iterating post reduction 0 with 129 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 378 transition count 237
Reduce places removed 129 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 141 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 249 transition count 225
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 241 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 240 transition count 224
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 240 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 193 transition count 177
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 520 place count 120 transition count 94
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 522 place count 119 transition count 94
Applied a total of 522 rules in 23 ms. Remains 119 /379 variables (removed 260) and now considering 94/367 (removed 273) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 119 cols
[2025-05-30 17:57:22] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 68, 87, 93, 99, 105, 111, 118]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/379 places, 94/367 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 102 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 93 transition count 85
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 87 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 87 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 86 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 86 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 85 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 85 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 84 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 84 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 83 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 83 transition count 75
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 82 transition count 74
Applied a total of 40 rules in 8 ms. Remains 82 /102 variables (removed 20) and now considering 74/94 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 82 cols
[2025-05-30 17:57:22] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:57:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:57:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 82/379 places, 74/367 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 292 ms. Remains : 82/379 places, 74/367 transitions.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Detected a total of 3/82 stabilizing places and 4/74 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/4 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 p3))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 p3))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 p3))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2 p3))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) p3))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) p3))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2 p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p3) (G (NOT p3))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 41 factoid took 920 ms. Reduced automaton from 18 states, 61 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 18 states, 61 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 862 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1557 resets) in 288 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 12/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (163 resets) in 60 ms. (655 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (163 resets) in 44 ms. (888 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (152 resets) in 37 ms. (1052 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (162 resets) in 36 ms. (1081 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (156 resets) in 37 ms. (1052 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (155 resets) in 32 ms. (1212 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (156 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (165 resets) in 34 ms. (1142 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (148 resets) in 31 ms. (1250 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (166 resets) in 38 ms. (1025 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (167 resets) in 30 ms. (1290 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (155 resets) in 39 ms. (1000 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-05-30 17:57:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:57:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
Problem apf11 is UNSAT
Problem apf13 is UNSAT
Problem apf16 is UNSAT
Problem apf22 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 46/50 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem apf8 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem apf9 is UNSAT
Problem apf12 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/82 variables, 14/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 74/156 variables, 82/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 16/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/156 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 156/156 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved in 346 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, ReadFeed: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 46/50 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/82 variables, 14/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 74/156 variables, 82/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 16/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 5/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/156 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 156/156 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved in 236 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 82/82 constraints, ReadFeed: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/12 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 588ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 5 unsolved
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 42 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 3 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=42 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 39 ms.
Found 7 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 p3))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 p3))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 p3))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2 p3))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) p3))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) p3))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2 p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p3) (G (NOT p3)))), (G (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3) p1)), (G (OR p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3) (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3) (NOT p1))), (G (OR p0 p2 (NOT p3) (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3) (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3) p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 (NOT p3) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F p2), (F p3), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 p3))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) p3 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p3 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p1)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p3 p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 48 factoid took 1773 ms. Reduced automaton from 18 states, 61 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 18 states, 61 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 816 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p2), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 822 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p2), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 42 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 37 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 16 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 72/221/72 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Added : 41 causal constraints over 10 iterations in 114 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 43 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 37 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 16 Read/Feed constraints in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 72/221/72 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Added : 71 causal constraints over 15 iterations in 132 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 46 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 17 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:30] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 38 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:57:30] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 16 Read/Feed constraints in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:57:30] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 72/221/72 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:57:30] [INFO ] Added : 71 causal constraints over 15 iterations in 125 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 888 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p1) p2), false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23613 reset in 144 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23604 reset in 153 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin11671387166406621583
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 74 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 74 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 74 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Built C files in 12ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin11671387166406621583
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11671387166406621583;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 171 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11671387166406621583;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 35 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11671387166406621583;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased867813948204307019.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 80 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-11 finished in 89846 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F((p0&&X(p1)))&&G(p2))))'
Support contains 3 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 386 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 386 transition count 375
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 386 transition count 374
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 378 transition count 366
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 376 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 376 transition count 364
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 375 transition count 363
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 375 transition count 363
Applied a total of 53 rules in 34 ms. Remains 375 /401 variables (removed 26) and now considering 363/390 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 363 rows 375 cols
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:57:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 250 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 386 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 362 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:57:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 375/738 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 85/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 11/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 363/738 variables, 375/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 362/887 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 104 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 738/738 variables, and 896 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 375/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60486 ms. Remains : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 196 ms :[(NOT p2), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-12 finished in 60704 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 386 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 386 transition count 375
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 386 transition count 374
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 378 transition count 366
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 376 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 376 transition count 364
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 375 transition count 363
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 375 transition count 363
Applied a total of 53 rules in 36 ms. Remains 375 /401 variables (removed 26) and now considering 363/390 (removed 27) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 261 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 389 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 362 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 74 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 111 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 161 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 114 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 375/738 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 83/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 117 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 13/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 7/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 6/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 363/738 variables, 375/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 362/880 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 107 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 738/738 variables, and 888 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 375/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60481 ms. Remains : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 240 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-13 finished in 60570 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((F(G(p0))&&F(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 386 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 386 transition count 375
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 386 transition count 374
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 378 transition count 366
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 376 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 376 transition count 364
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 375 transition count 363
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 375 transition count 363
Applied a total of 53 rules in 29 ms. Remains 375 /401 variables (removed 26) and now considering 363/390 (removed 27) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:59:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:59:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 230 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 383 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 362 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:59:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 143 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 146 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 150 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30135ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30137ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30550 ms. Remains : 375/401 places, 363/390 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 163 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 805 reset in 164 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 817 reset in 168 ms.
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Detected a total of 91/375 stabilizing places and 91/363 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 201 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 203 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 467 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 303 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 173 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
[2025-05-30 18:00:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:00:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:00:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 537 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:00:05] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:00:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:00:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 397 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:00:06] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 362/517/362 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 18 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Added : 258 causal constraints over 52 iterations in 2203 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 2 out of 375 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 375/375 places, 363/363 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 375 /375 variables (removed 0) and now considering 363/363 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 247 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 408 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 362 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:00:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 164 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 159 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 123 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 375/738 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 83/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 13/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 7/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 6/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 363/738 variables, 375/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 362/880 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 130 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 738/738 variables, and 888 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 375/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60062ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60479 ms. Remains : 375/375 places, 363/363 transitions.
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Detected a total of 91/375 stabilizing places and 91/363 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 98 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 522 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 120 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:01:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 513 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 33 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 410 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 18:01:10] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 362/517/362 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 17 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:01:12] [INFO ] Added : 258 causal constraints over 52 iterations in 2079 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 213 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 774 reset in 172 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 829 reset in 183 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, false, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 209 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 2 out of 375 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 375/375 places, 363/363 transitions.
Performed 117 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 117 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 375 transition count 363
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 375 transition count 358
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 375 transition count 358
Deduced a syphon composed of 173 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 375 transition count 358
Discarding 99 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 99 rule applications. Total rules 277 place count 276 transition count 259
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 99 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 276 transition count 259
Performed 86 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 160 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 276 transition count 249
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 519 place count 219 transition count 192
Deduced a syphon composed of 103 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 576 place count 219 transition count 192
Deduced a syphon composed of 103 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 576 rules in 33 ms. Remains 219 /375 variables (removed 156) and now considering 192/363 (removed 171) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 191 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 219 cols
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 32/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 60 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD165 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 14/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 192/411 variables, 219/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 37/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/411 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 411/411 variables, and 329 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved in 11932 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 100/215 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 37/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/219 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 192/411 variables, 219/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 37/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 88/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 2/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 1/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 411/411 variables, and 419 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/191 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 41961ms problems are : Problem set: 103 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 103 dead transitions in 41962ms
Found 103 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 103 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 103 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 219/375 places, 89/363 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 296 edges and 219 vertex of which 116 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 103 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 103 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 116 /219 variables (removed 103) and now considering 89/89 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 116/375 places, 89/363 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 42013 ms. Remains : 116/375 places, 89/363 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin4338300293443155114
[2025-05-30 18:01:55] [INFO ] Built C files in 4ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin4338300293443155114
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4338300293443155114;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 548 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4338300293443155114;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 37 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin4338300293443155114;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased7654794149925530835.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 2 out of 375 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 375/375 places, 363/363 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 375 /375 variables (removed 0) and now considering 363/363 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 363 rows 375 cols
[2025-05-30 18:02:11] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:02:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 246 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 378 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 362 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:02:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 375/738 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 85/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 11/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 363/738 variables, 375/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 362/887 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 113 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 9/896 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 738/738 variables, and 896 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 375/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60447 ms. Remains : 375/375 places, 363/363 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1452989628384875782
[2025-05-30 18:03:11] [INFO ] Built C files in 11ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1452989628384875782
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1452989628384875782;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 552 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1452989628384875782;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 34 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1452989628384875782;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased11962714760106808835.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 18:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL5327549543193851978.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL10836348498247355575.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL5327549543193851978.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut10171042325820831441.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL10836348498247355575.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...319
Loading property file /tmp/LTL10836348498247355575.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut10171042325820831441.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL11064794952387913287.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL1280900429626405105.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL11064794952387913287.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL1280900429626405105.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X((F(G("(p17==0)")))&&(F("(p308==1)"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XX(GF!"(p17==0)" | G!"(p308==1)")
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5022403371741081506.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5022403371741081506.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5022403371741081506.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5022403371741081506.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5022403371741081506.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 71 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL5274448463537750442.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL6000277554286675770.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL5274448463537750442.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL6000277554286675770.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...254
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(X((F(G("(i8.u7.p17==0)")))&&(F("(i23.u86.p308==1)"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : XX(GF!"(i8.u7.p17==0)" | G!"(i23.u86.p308==1)")
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t118, t121, t144, t147, t158, t161, t205, t227, t245, t252, t297, t377, t378, t379, t381, t38...844
Computing Next relation with stutter on 800 deadlock states
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-14 finished in 279004 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0&&X(X(X((X(p2)||p1)))))))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(F((p0&&X(X(p0)))))||(F((p0&&X(X(p0))))&&(p1 U (p2||G(p1)))))))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((F(G(p0))&&F(p1)))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 230 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 2 out of 401 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 401/401 places, 390/390 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 142 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 142 transitions
Performed 142 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 142
Iterating post reduction 0 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 400 transition count 247
Reduce places removed 142 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 258 transition count 231
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 248 transition count 231
Performed 50 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 50 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 248 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 198 transition count 181
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 420 place count 188 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 188 transition count 171
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 188 transition count 166
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 183 transition count 166
Performed 65 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 570 place count 118 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 117 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 582 place count 109 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 585 place count 106 transition count 87
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 585 place count 106 transition count 82
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 595 place count 101 transition count 82
Applied a total of 595 rules in 21 ms. Remains 101 /401 variables (removed 300) and now considering 82/390 (removed 308) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 101 cols
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [100]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 84 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/401 places, 82/390 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 93 transition count 75
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 93 /100 variables (removed 7) and now considering 75/82 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/401 places, 75/390 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 270 ms. Remains : 93/401 places, 75/390 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1917 steps with 95 reset in 4 ms.
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-14 finished in 624 ms.
Length sensitive decision was in the wrong direction : Shortening insensitive + false
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 390 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 390 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13157211725799980435.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13157211725799980435.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13157211725799980435.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13157211725799980435.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13157211725799980435.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 390 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 9 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Built C files in 59ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '240' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 65 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability2122436853774515652.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 18:04:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability4176166612121676195.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability2122436853774515652.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability4176166612121676195.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 3 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F(("(i3.u8.p23==1)")&&(X(X(X(("(((i10.u66.p229==0)&&(i3.u15.p39==0))||(i3.u15.p39==1))")||(X("(i3.u8.p23==0)")))))))))
Formula 0 simplified : G(!"(i3.u8.p23==1)" | XXX(!"(((i10.u66.p229==0)&&(i3.u15.p39==0))||(i3.u15.p39==1))" & X!"(i3.u8.p23==0)"))
Compilation finished in 778 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '<>(((LTLAPp0==true)&&X(X(X((X((LTLAPp2==true))||(LTLAPp1==true)))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t118, t121, t134, t144, t158, t161, t172, t198, t205, t220, t227, t245, t252, t278, t297, t37...996
Computing Next relation with stutter on 800 deadlock states
194 unique states visited
188 strongly connected components in search stack
194 transitions explored
188 items max in DFS search stack
8544 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,85.4926,1337968,1,0,3.13731e+06,304,4941,4.43491e+06,194,1089,4234049
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 1 : !((F((G(F(("(i9.u54.p191!=1)")&&(X(X("(i9.u54.p191!=1)"))))))||((F(("(i9.u54.p191!=1)")&&(X(X("(i9.u54.p191!=1)")))))&&(("(i1.u16.p64=...254
Formula 1 simplified : G(FG(!"(i9.u54.p191!=1)" | XX!"(i9.u54.p191!=1)") & (G(!"(i9.u54.p191!=1)" | XX!"(i9.u54.p191!=1)") | (!"(i1.u16.p64==1)" M !"((!((i...211
Computing Next relation with stutter on 800 deadlock states
LTSmin run took 314615 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '<>(([](<>(((LTLAPp3==true)&&X(X((LTLAPp3==true))))))||(<>(((LTLAPp3==true)&&X(X((LTLAPp3==true)))))&&((LTLAPp4==true) U ((LTLAPp5==true)||[]((LTLAPp4==true)))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTSmin timed out (>400 s) on command cd /tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '<>(([](<>(((LTLAPp3==true)&&X(X((LTLAPp3==true))))))||(<>(((LTLAPp3==true)&&X(X((LTLAPp3==true)))))&&((LTLAPp4==true) U ((LTLAPp5==true)||[]((LTLAPp4==true)))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' 'X(X((<>([]((LTLAPp6==true)))&&<>((LTLAPp7==true)))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTSmin timed out (>400 s) on command cd /tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' 'X(X((<>([]((LTLAPp6==true)))&&<>((LTLAPp7==true)))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Retrying LTSmin with larger timeout 9600 s
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2959920641620874212;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '<>(([](<>(((LTLAPp3==true)&&X(X((LTLAPp3==true))))))||(<>(((LTLAPp3==true)&&X(X((LTLAPp3==true)))))&&((LTLAPp4==true) U ((LTLAPp5==true)||[]((LTLAPp4==true)))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:32:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 18:32:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 18:32:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 54 labels/synchronizations in 58 ms.
[2025-05-30 18:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability13889329164808101496.gal : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 18:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability6656432371101780918.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability13889329164808101496.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability6656432371101780918.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 2 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G(F(("(i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u37.p191!=1)")&&(X(X("(i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u37.p191!=1)"))))))|...682
Formula 0 simplified : G(FG(!"(i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u37.p191!=1)" | XX!"(i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u37.p191!=1)") & (G(!"(i0...573

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400516"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-05b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;