Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400515.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400515
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748625680075

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 88 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Transformed 482 places.
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Transformed 480 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 482 places and 480 transitions and 1120 arcs in 179 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 25 out of 482 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 480/480 transitions.
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 419 transition count 417
Iterating global reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 419 transition count 417
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 419 transition count 408
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 163 place count 391 transition count 380
Iterating global reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 391 transition count 380
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 387 transition count 376
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 387 transition count 376
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 383 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 383 transition count 372
Applied a total of 207 rules in 168 ms. Remains 383 /482 variables (removed 99) and now considering 372/480 (removed 108) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 372 rows 383 cols
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 18 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 331 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 279 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 646 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 371 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 161 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 105 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 9/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 383/755 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved in 32053 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 371/371 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 109/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 70 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 19/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 6/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 12/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 372/755 variables, 383/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/755 variables, 371/935 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 755/755 variables, and 935 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 371/371 constraints, Known Traps: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 62146ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 62158ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 383/482 places, 372/480 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62993 ms. Remains : 383/482 places, 372/480 transitions.
Support contains 25 out of 383 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 372 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (160 resets) in 1581 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 3/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (16 resets) in 178 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (13 resets) in 154 ms. (258 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (13 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-05-30 17:22:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 145/148 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 207/355 variables, 29/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/383 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 372/755 variables, 383/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/755 variables, 6/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/755 variables, 0/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/755 variables, 0/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 755/755 variables, and 424 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 1370 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 145/148 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 207/355 variables, 29/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 2/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/383 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 5/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 372/755 variables, 383/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/755 variables, 3/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/755 variables, 3/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/755 variables, 2/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/755 variables, 0/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/755 variables, 0/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 755/755 variables, and 434 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 1136 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2511ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1182 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 136 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 136 transitions
Performed 136 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 136
Iterating post reduction 0 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 383 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 136 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 247 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 237 transition count 220
Performed 46 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 46 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 237 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 191 transition count 174
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 391 place count 190 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 190 transition count 173
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 190 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 394 place count 189 transition count 172
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 540 place count 116 transition count 89
Free-agglomeration rule applied 20 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 560 place count 116 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 580 place count 96 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 581 place count 95 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 4 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 631 place count 72 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 658 place count 45 transition count 41
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 658 place count 45 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 688 place count 30 transition count 26
Applied a total of 688 rules in 64 ms. Remains 30 /383 variables (removed 353) and now considering 26/372 (removed 346) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 64 ms. Remains : 30/383 places, 26/372 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 122 steps (0 resets) in 11 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Computed a total of 96 stabilizing places and 96 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 134 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 134 transitions
Performed 134 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 134
Iterating post reduction 0 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 382 transition count 237
Reduce places removed 134 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 248 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 238 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 237 transition count 220
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 237 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 190 transition count 173
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 393 place count 187 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 187 transition count 170
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 187 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 185 transition count 168
Performed 69 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 69 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 538 place count 116 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 539 place count 115 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 4 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 552 place count 106 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 556 place count 102 transition count 84
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 556 place count 102 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 566 place count 97 transition count 79
Applied a total of 566 rules in 51 ms. Remains 97 /383 variables (removed 286) and now considering 79/372 (removed 293) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 97 cols
[2025-05-30 17:22:29] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [96]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/383 places, 79/372 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 89 transition count 72
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 89 /96 variables (removed 7) and now considering 72/79 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 89 cols
[2025-05-30 17:22:29] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:22:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/383 places, 72/372 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 263 ms. Remains : 89/383 places, 72/372 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 187 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9724 reset in 243 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9629 reset in 191 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 181 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 26 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 21 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (4 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 153 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 42 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 46 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2025-05-30 17:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 24 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 45 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 24 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 29 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 51/78/51 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 16 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 89 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 89/89 places, 72/72 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 89 /89 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 51 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/161 variables, 89/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 161/161 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 1315 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/161 variables, 89/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 51/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 161/161 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 1812 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3135ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3275 ms. Remains : 89/89 places, 72/72 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 158 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 32 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 38 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (6 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 172 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2025-05-30 17:22:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 24 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:22:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 33 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:22:34] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 24 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 25 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 51/78/51 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 15 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9676 reset in 141 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9684 reset in 230 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6920922829874775091
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 72 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 72 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 72 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Built C files in 55ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6920922829874775091
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6920922829874775091;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 305 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6920922829874775091;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 48 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6920922829874775091;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased4508806938570432401.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 9545 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 16006 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((X(X(F(p0)))||G(!p1)||(!p1&&F(p2)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 381 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 381 transition count 370
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 381 transition count 369
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 380 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 380 transition count 368
Applied a total of 7 rules in 102 ms. Remains 380 /383 variables (removed 3) and now considering 368/372 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 380 cols
[2025-05-30 17:22:45] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:22:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 227 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 364 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 367 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 138 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 11/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 108 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/748 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 367/367 constraints, Known Traps: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 94/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 6/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 93 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 6/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 368/748 variables, 380/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 367/887 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 748/748 variables, and 896 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 380/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 367/367 constraints, Known Traps: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 380/383 places, 368/372 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60526 ms. Remains : 380/383 places, 368/372 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 239 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25002 reset in 107 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25021 reset in 116 ms.
Computed a total of 96 stabilizing places and 96 stable transitions
Computed a total of 96 stabilizing places and 96 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 115 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 224 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (161 resets) in 506 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (15 resets) in 99 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (13 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-05-30 17:23:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 153/158 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 194/352 variables, 28/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 368/748 variables, 380/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/748 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 748/748 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 265 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 380/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 153/158 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 194/352 variables, 28/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/380 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 368/748 variables, 380/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 4/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/748 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 748/748 variables, and 420 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 774 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 380/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1045ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 256 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 380 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 380/380 places, 368/368 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 132 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 132 transitions
Performed 132 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 132
Iterating post reduction 0 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 380 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 132 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 248 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 240 transition count 223
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 239 transition count 223
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 239 transition count 176
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 192 transition count 176
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 530 place count 117 transition count 91
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 531 place count 117 transition count 90
Free-agglomeration rule applied 20 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 551 place count 117 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 97 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 572 place count 96 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 5 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 628 place count 73 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 661 place count 40 transition count 36
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 661 place count 40 transition count 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 685 place count 28 transition count 24
Applied a total of 685 rules in 45 ms. Remains 28 /380 variables (removed 352) and now considering 24/368 (removed 344) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 28/380 places, 24/368 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1358 steps (0 resets) in 8 ms. (150 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 331 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 199 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 205 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 5 out of 380 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 380/380 places, 368/368 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 380 /380 variables (removed 0) and now considering 368/368 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:23:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:23:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 234 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 351 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 367 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:23:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 150 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 79 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 11/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 100 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/748 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 367/367 constraints, Known Traps: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 94/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 6/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 6/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 368/748 variables, 380/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 367/887 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 9/896 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 748/748 variables, and 896 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 380/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 367/367 constraints, Known Traps: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60070ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60433 ms. Remains : 380/380 places, 368/368 transitions.
Computed a total of 96 stabilizing places and 96 stable transitions
Computed a total of 96 stabilizing places and 96 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 111 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 219 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (160 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (13 resets) in 49 ms. (800 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (14 resets) in 29 ms. (1333 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 29 ms. (1333 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (13 resets) in 28 ms. (1379 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 153/158 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 194/352 variables, 28/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 368/748 variables, 380/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/748 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 748/748 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 283 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 380/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 153/158 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 194/352 variables, 28/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/380 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 368/748 variables, 380/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 4/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/748 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 748/748 variables, and 420 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 742 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 380/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1030ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 323 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 380 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 380/380 places, 368/368 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 132 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 132 transitions
Performed 132 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 132
Iterating post reduction 0 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 380 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 132 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 248 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 240 transition count 223
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 239 transition count 223
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 239 transition count 176
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 192 transition count 176
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 530 place count 117 transition count 91
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 531 place count 117 transition count 90
Free-agglomeration rule applied 20 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 551 place count 117 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 97 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 572 place count 96 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 5 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 628 place count 73 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 661 place count 40 transition count 36
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 661 place count 40 transition count 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 685 place count 28 transition count 24
Applied a total of 685 rules in 28 ms. Remains 28 /380 variables (removed 352) and now considering 24/368 (removed 344) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 28 ms. Remains : 28/380 places, 24/368 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1571 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (224 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 333 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 235 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 219 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 212 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25029 reset in 112 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24974 reset in 113 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, true, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 207 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 5 out of 380 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 380/380 places, 368/368 transitions.
Performed 118 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 380 transition count 368
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 380 transition count 364
Performed 48 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 48 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 380 transition count 365
Deduced a syphon composed of 170 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 380 transition count 365
Discarding 95 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 95 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 285 transition count 270
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 285 transition count 270
Performed 90 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 165 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 454 place count 285 transition count 260
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 509 place count 230 transition count 205
Deduced a syphon composed of 110 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 564 place count 230 transition count 205
Deduced a syphon composed of 110 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 564 rules in 60 ms. Remains 230 /380 variables (removed 150) and now considering 205/368 (removed 163) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 204 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 205 rows 230 cols
[2025-05-30 17:24:53] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/230 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD163 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD165 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 67 solved, 137 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD192 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 15/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 205/435 variables, 230/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 30/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 3/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/435 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 435/435 variables, and 332 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved in 12411 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 230/230 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 107/226 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 35/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/230 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 205/435 variables, 230/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 30/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 93/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 3/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 0/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 435/435 variables, and 425 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 230/230 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/204 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 42471ms problems are : Problem set: 111 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 111 dead transitions in 42471ms
Found 111 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 111 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 111 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 230/380 places, 94/368 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 301 edges and 230 vertex of which 120 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 110 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 110 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 120 /230 variables (removed 110) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 120/380 places, 94/368 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 42553 ms. Remains : 120/380 places, 94/368 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin5926549623268609066
[2025-05-30 17:25:35] [INFO ] Built C files in 11ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin5926549623268609066
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5926549623268609066;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 518 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5926549623268609066;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 42 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin5926549623268609066;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased17751202261130978940.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 5 out of 380 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 380/380 places, 368/368 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 380 /380 variables (removed 0) and now considering 368/368 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 380 cols
[2025-05-30 17:25:50] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:25:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 231 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 342 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 367 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:25:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 11/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 118 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 100 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30076ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30078ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30437 ms. Remains : 380/380 places, 368/368 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6229907388964221617
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Built C files in 8ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6229907388964221617
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6229907388964221617;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 539 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6229907388964221617;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 34 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6229907388964221617;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased8778366910746981773.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 17:26:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL4823515711116742132.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2135400253284253774.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL4823515711116742132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut14878735255032007837.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL2135400253284253774.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL2135400253284253774.prop.
Loaded 3 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut14878735255032007837.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14489784522678168574.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2339129963925053866.ltl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14489784522678168574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL2339129963925053866.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(((X(X(F("((p100==0)||(p206==1))"))))||(G("((p299!=0)&&(p221!=1))")))||(("((p299!=0)&&(p221!=1))")&&(F("(p363!=1)"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : F(XXG!"((p100==0)||(p206==1))" & F!"((p299!=0)&&(p221!=1))" & (!"((p299!=0)&&(p221!=1))" | G!"(p363!=1)"))
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5353848135591952476.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5353848135591952476.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5353848135591952476.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5353848135591952476.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5353848135591952476.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL16735972110696614445.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2619657499165854788.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL16735972110696614445.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL2619657499165854788.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(((X(X(F("((i5.i0.u29.p100==0)||(i8.i0.u55.p206==1))"))))||(G("((i12.i0.u82.p299!=0)&&(i8.i2.u60.p221!=1))")))||(("((i12.i0.u82.p2...219
Formula 0 simplified : F(XXG!"((i5.i0.u29.p100==0)||(i8.i0.u55.p206==1))" & F!"((i12.i0.u82.p299!=0)&&(i8.i2.u60.p221!=1))" & (!"((i12.i0.u82.p299!=0)&&(i8...203
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 276513 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((G(p0) U (G(F(p1)) U G(p2))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 379 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 379 transition count 368
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 379 transition count 367
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 377 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 377 transition count 365
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 376 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 376 transition count 364
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 375 transition count 363
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 375 transition count 363
Applied a total of 17 rules in 38 ms. Remains 375 /383 variables (removed 8) and now considering 363/372 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 363 rows 375 cols
[2025-05-30 17:27:22] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 129 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:27:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 237 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 368 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 362 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:27:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30062ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 375/383 places, 363/372 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30470 ms. Remains : 375/383 places, 363/372 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 325 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20006 reset in 115 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20025 reset in 167 ms.
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 112 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 18 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 14 states, 40 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 620 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), false, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), false]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (158 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 1/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 26 ms. (1481 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:27:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 102/105 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 242/347 variables, 30/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 363/738 variables, 375/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 0/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/738 variables, 0/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 738/738 variables, and 409 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 165 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 375/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 102/105 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 242/347 variables, 30/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 363/738 variables, 375/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 1/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 0/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/738 variables, 0/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 738/738 variables, and 412 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 372 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 375/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 541ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 151 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=151 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 6 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p2 p1))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 341 ms. Reduced automaton from 14 states, 40 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 8 states, 22 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 334 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND p2 (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), false, (AND (NOT p1) p2), false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 312 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND p2 (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), false, (AND (NOT p1) p2), false]
[2025-05-30 17:27:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 33 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned unsat
Proved EG (NOT p2)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p2 p1))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (G (NOT p2))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (NOT p2))
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 370 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 22 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 33963 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 136 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 136 transitions
Performed 136 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 136
Iterating post reduction 0 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 382 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 136 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 246 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 236 transition count 219
Performed 46 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 46 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 236 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 190 transition count 173
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 393 place count 187 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 187 transition count 170
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 187 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 185 transition count 168
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 9 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 114 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 543 place count 114 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 544 place count 113 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 4 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 557 place count 104 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 561 place count 100 transition count 82
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 561 place count 100 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 571 place count 95 transition count 77
Applied a total of 571 rules in 32 ms. Remains 95 /383 variables (removed 288) and now considering 77/372 (removed 295) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [38, 55, 72, 77, 81, 85, 89, 94]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/383 places, 77/372 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 81 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 81 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 80 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 80 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 79 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 79 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 78 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 78 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 77 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 77 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 76 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 76 transition count 66
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 75 transition count 65
Applied a total of 24 rules in 10 ms. Remains 75 /87 variables (removed 12) and now considering 65/77 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 75 cols
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/383 places, 65/372 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 225 ms. Remains : 75/383 places, 65/372 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-06
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 18 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 299 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 136 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 136 transitions
Performed 136 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 136
Iterating post reduction 0 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 382 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 136 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 246 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 236 transition count 219
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 236 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 189 transition count 172
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 395 place count 186 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 186 transition count 169
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 186 transition count 167
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 184 transition count 167
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 114 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 543 place count 113 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 558 place count 103 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 563 place count 98 transition count 81
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 563 place count 98 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 573 place count 93 transition count 76
Applied a total of 573 rules in 28 ms. Remains 93 /383 variables (removed 290) and now considering 76/372 (removed 296) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned [75, 79, 83, 87, 92]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 63 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/383 places, 76/372 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 85 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 85 transition count 73
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 81 transition count 69
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 81 /88 variables (removed 7) and now considering 69/76 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 81 cols
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 81/383 places, 69/372 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 219 ms. Remains : 81/383 places, 69/372 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 30 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 19 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 268 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(((p0&&G(p1)) U (p2&&F(p3)))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 380 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 380 transition count 369
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 380 transition count 368
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 379 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 379 transition count 367
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 378 transition count 366
Applied a total of 11 rules in 48 ms. Remains 378 /383 variables (removed 5) and now considering 366/372 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 366 rows 378 cols
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 244 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 367 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 365 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:27:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 102 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 103 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 107 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 88 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 12/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 6/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 378/744 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 71/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 9/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 3/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 365/900 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 744/744 variables, and 909 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 378/383 places, 366/372 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60469 ms. Remains : 378/383 places, 366/372 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 337 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 110 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 117 ms.
Computed a total of 92 stabilizing places and 92 stable transitions
Computed a total of 92 stabilizing places and 92 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p0) p1 p3)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 96 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 7 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 294 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (159 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 3/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 32 ms. (1212 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 25 ms. (1538 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (13 resets) in 26 ms. (1481 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 131/135 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 215/350 variables, 28/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 2/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/744 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 744/744 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 504 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 131/135 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 215/350 variables, 28/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/378 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 3/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 8/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/744 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 744/744 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 1883 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2393ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 413 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 378 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 366/366 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 130 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 130 transitions
Performed 130 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 130
Iterating post reduction 0 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 378 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 130 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 145 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 248 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 238 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 237 transition count 220
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 237 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 190 transition count 173
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 527 place count 117 transition count 90
Free-agglomeration rule applied 20 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 547 place count 117 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 567 place count 97 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 568 place count 96 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 5 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 616 place count 73 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 641 place count 48 transition count 44
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 641 place count 48 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 671 place count 33 transition count 29
Applied a total of 671 rules in 17 ms. Remains 33 /378 variables (removed 345) and now considering 29/366 (removed 337) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 33/378 places, 29/366 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 396 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p0) p1 p3)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (AND (OR p0 p2) (OR p1 p2)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT p3)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p3)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 252 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 7 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 265 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 305 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
Support contains 6 out of 378 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 366/366 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 378 /378 variables (removed 0) and now considering 366/366 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:29:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:29:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 243 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 362 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 365 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:29:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 12/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 6/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 378/744 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 71/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 9/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 3/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 365/900 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 79 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 744/744 variables, and 909 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60418 ms. Remains : 378/378 places, 366/366 transitions.
Computed a total of 92 stabilizing places and 92 stable transitions
Computed a total of 92 stabilizing places and 92 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 p3)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 119 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 7 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 309 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (160 resets) in 173 ms. (229 steps per ms) remains 3/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (15 resets) in 87 ms. (454 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (13 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-05-30 17:30:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 131/135 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 215/350 variables, 28/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 28/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 2/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/744 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 744/744 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 482 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 131/135 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 215/350 variables, 28/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/378 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 3/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 8/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/744 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 744/744 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 1905 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2394ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 505 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 378 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 366/366 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 130 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 130 transitions
Performed 130 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 130
Iterating post reduction 0 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 378 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 130 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 145 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 248 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 238 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 237 transition count 220
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 237 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 190 transition count 173
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 527 place count 117 transition count 90
Free-agglomeration rule applied 20 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 547 place count 117 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 567 place count 97 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 568 place count 96 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 5 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 616 place count 73 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 641 place count 48 transition count 44
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 641 place count 48 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 671 place count 33 transition count 29
Applied a total of 671 rules in 15 ms. Remains 33 /378 variables (removed 345) and now considering 29/366 (removed 337) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 15 ms. Remains : 33/378 places, 29/366 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 30009 steps (6 resets) in 70 ms. (422 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 p3)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (AND (OR p0 p2) (OR p1 p2)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT p3)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p3)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 233 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 7 states, 11 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 318 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 323 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 329 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 103 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 111 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, false, true, true, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 311 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3)]
Support contains 6 out of 378 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 378/378 places, 366/366 transitions.
Performed 117 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 117 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 378 transition count 366
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 378 transition count 361
Performed 49 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 49 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 378 transition count 361
Deduced a syphon composed of 171 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 378 transition count 361
Discarding 97 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 97 rule applications. Total rules 273 place count 281 transition count 264
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 97 rules applied. Total rules applied 370 place count 281 transition count 264
Performed 88 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 162 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 281 transition count 254
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 515 place count 224 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 105 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 572 place count 224 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 105 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 572 rules in 32 ms. Remains 224 /378 variables (removed 154) and now considering 197/366 (removed 169) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 224 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:07] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 34 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/224 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD128 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD163 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD165 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 66 solved, 130 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD187 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 13/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 197/421 variables, 224/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 34/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/421 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 421/421 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved in 9619 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 224/224 constraints, ReadFeed: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 102/220 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 33/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/224 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 197/421 variables, 224/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 34/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 91/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 1/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 1/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/421 variables, 0/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 421/421 variables, and 418 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 224/224 constraints, ReadFeed: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/196 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 39676ms problems are : Problem set: 105 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 105 dead transitions in 39677ms
Found 105 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 105 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 105 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 224/378 places, 92/366 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 301 edges and 224 vertex of which 119 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 105 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 105 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 119 /224 variables (removed 105) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 119/378 places, 92/366 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 39730 ms. Remains : 119/378 places, 92/366 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin4196357949580322419
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Built C files in 9ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin4196357949580322419
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4196357949580322419;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 560 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4196357949580322419;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 42 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin4196357949580322419;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased14384888093685562692.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 178 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 171600 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(X(p0)) U ((X(X(p0))&&G(!p1))||X(X(G(p0)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 380 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 380 transition count 369
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 378 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 378 transition count 367
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 377 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 377 transition count 366
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 376 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 376 transition count 365
Applied a total of 14 rules in 28 ms. Remains 376 /383 variables (removed 7) and now considering 365/372 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 365 rows 376 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:48] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 217 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 338 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 364 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/376 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 5/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 8/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 376/741 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/376 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 364/364 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/376 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 74/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 15/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 3/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 7/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 6/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 376/741 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/376 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/364 constraints, Known Traps: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 376/383 places, 365/372 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60425 ms. Remains : 376/383 places, 365/372 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 335 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), true, (AND p1 p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20055 reset in 120 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19967 reset in 118 ms.
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 p0)), (X p0), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 127 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 21 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 21 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 280 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), true, (AND p1 p0)]
RANDOM walk for 5341 steps (18 resets) in 34 ms. (152 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 p0)), (X p0), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 202 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 21 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 61668 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 379 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 379 transition count 368
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 379 transition count 367
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 377 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 377 transition count 365
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 376 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 376 transition count 364
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 375 transition count 363
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 375 transition count 363
Applied a total of 17 rules in 37 ms. Remains 375 /383 variables (removed 8) and now considering 363/372 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 363 rows 375 cols
[2025-05-30 17:31:49] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:31:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 221 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 361 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 362 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:31:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 115 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 17/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 375/738 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/375 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 83/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 13/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 7/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 6/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 363/738 variables, 375/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/738 variables, 362/880 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 738/738 variables, and 887 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 375/375 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 362/362 constraints, Known Traps: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 362 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 375/383 places, 363/372 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60459 ms. Remains : 375/383 places, 363/372 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 139 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 122 ms.
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Computed a total of 91 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 60858 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((X(X(F(p0)))||G(!p1)||(!p1&&F(p2)))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 193 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 5 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 372/372 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 130 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 130 transitions
Performed 130 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 130
Iterating post reduction 0 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 382 transition count 241
Reduce places removed 130 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 143 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 252 transition count 228
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 244 transition count 226
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 242 transition count 226
Performed 47 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 47 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 242 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 379 place count 195 transition count 179
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 380 place count 194 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 194 transition count 178
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 194 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 193 transition count 177
Performed 73 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 10 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 73 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 73 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 529 place count 120 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 530 place count 119 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 4 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 543 place count 110 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 547 place count 106 transition count 89
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 547 place count 106 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 557 place count 101 transition count 84
Applied a total of 557 rules in 22 ms. Remains 101 /383 variables (removed 282) and now considering 84/372 (removed 288) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 101 cols
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [43, 78, 82, 86, 90, 94, 100]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/383 places, 84/372 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 89 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 89 transition count 79
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 88 transition count 78
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 88 /94 variables (removed 6) and now considering 78/84 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 88 cols
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/383 places, 78/372 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 218 ms. Remains : 88/383 places, 78/372 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20085 reset in 168 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20175 reset in 191 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 205 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 200 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1518 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (134 resets) in 33 ms. (1176 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (138 resets) in 25 ms. (1538 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (135 resets) in 24 ms. (1600 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (119 resets) in 32 ms. (1212 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 27/32 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 27/59 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 62/121 variables, 59/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 45/166 variables, 29/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 13/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 82 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 27/32 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 27/59 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 62/121 variables, 59/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 45/166 variables, 29/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 13/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 111 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 217 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 302ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 155 steps, including 6 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=38 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 4 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 428 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 196 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 216 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Support contains 5 out of 88 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 88/88 places, 78/78 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 88 /88 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 51 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/88 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 78/166 variables, 88/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 1561 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/88 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 78/166 variables, 88/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 51/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 1231 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2797ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2797ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2923 ms. Remains : 88/88 places, 78/78 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 219 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 211 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1505 resets) in 180 ms. (220 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (139 resets) in 26 ms. (1481 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (139 resets) in 26 ms. (1481 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (136 resets) in 25 ms. (1538 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (119 resets) in 23 ms. (1666 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 27/32 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 27/59 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 62/121 variables, 59/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 45/166 variables, 29/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 13/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 84 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 27/32 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 27/59 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 62/121 variables, 59/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 45/166 variables, 29/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 13/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 111 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 225 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 313ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 120 steps, including 3 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=60 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 1 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 440 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 205 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 210 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 222 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19955 reset in 157 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 47738 steps with 9467 reset with depth 8 and stack size 8 in 106 ms.
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-05b-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 7734 ms.
Length sensitive decision was in the wrong direction : Shortening insensitive + false
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16076430052256089098
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 372 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 372 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6988390781366335175.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6988390781366335175.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6988390781366335175.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6988390781366335175.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6988390781366335175.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 372 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 16 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Built C files in 75ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16076430052256089098
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16076430052256089098;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '720' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 68 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLCardinality10606313202971717848.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLCardinality11648073619293109327.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLCardinality10606313202971717848.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLCardinality11648073619293109327.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...278
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(((X(X(F("((i6.i1.u29.p100==0)||(i12.i3.u58.p206==1))"))))||(G(!("((i16.i0.u85.p299==0)||(i12.i4.u57.p221==1))"))))||((!("((i16.i0...228
Formula 0 simplified : F(XXG!"((i6.i1.u29.p100==0)||(i12.i3.u58.p206==1))" & F"((i16.i0.u85.p299==0)||(i12.i4.u57.p221==1))" & ("((i16.i0.u85.p299==0)||(i1...204
Compilation finished in 729 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16076430052256089098;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 40 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16076430052256089098;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '[]((X(X(<>((LTLAPp0==true))))||[](!(LTLAPp1==true))||(!(LTLAPp1==true)&&<>((LTLAPp2==true)))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t112, t115, t128, t138, t141, t164, t167, t189, t196, t211, t218, t234, t241, t256, t263, t35...964
Computing Next relation with stutter on 800 deadlock states
pins2lts-mc-linux64, 0.000: Registering PINS so language module
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.000: Loading model from ./gal.so
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 3/ 8), 0.001: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 0.001: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 4/ 8), 0.000: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 4/ 8), 0.000: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 0.001: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.000: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.001: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 3/ 8), 0.001: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.000: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 6/ 8), 0.006: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 6/ 8), 0.006: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 0.006: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 0.006: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.010: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.011: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.011: LTL layer: formula: []((X(X(<>((LTLAPp0==true))))||[](!(LTLAPp1==true))||(!(LTLAPp1==true)&&<>((LTLAPp2==true)))))
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.012: "[]((X(X(<>((LTLAPp0==true))))||[](!(LTLAPp1==true))||(!(LTLAPp1==true)&&<>((LTLAPp2==true)))))" is not a file, parsing as formula...
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.012: Using Spin LTL semantics
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 5/ 8), 0.017: library has no initializer
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 5/ 8), 0.017: loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 3/ 8), 0.021: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.022: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 0.023: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 0.023: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 4/ 8), 0.024: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 6/ 8), 0.025: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 5/ 8), 0.026: completed loading model GAL
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.046: Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.120: DFS-FIFO for weak LTL, using special progress label 376
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.120: There are 377 state labels and 1 edge labels
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.120: State length is 384, there are 379 groups
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.120: Running dfsfifo using 8 cores
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.120: Using a tree table with 2^27 elements
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.120: Successor permutation: rr
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 0.120: Global bits: 2, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 4/ 8), 0.163: ~2 levels ~960 states ~2184 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 6/ 8), 0.196: ~2 levels ~1920 states ~6896 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 0.233: ~2 levels ~3840 states ~16568 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 0.305: ~2 levels ~7680 states ~30960 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 0.460: ~2 levels ~15360 states ~69720 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 0.787: ~2 levels ~30720 states ~149872 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 6/ 8), 1.425: ~2 levels ~61440 states ~327400 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 1/ 8), 2.520: ~2 levels ~122880 states ~671520 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 4.555: ~2 levels ~245760 states ~1487792 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 7/ 8), 7.827: ~2 levels ~491520 states ~2976648 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 13.894: ~2 levels ~983040 states ~6372408 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 4/ 8), 25.612: ~2 levels ~1966080 states ~13017520 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 50.096: ~2 levels ~3932160 states ~27544944 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 100.531: ~2 levels ~7864320 states ~57871872 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 204.506: ~2 levels ~15728640 states ~122206520 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 402.791: ~2 levels ~31457280 states ~239834472 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 2/ 8), 832.450: ~2 levels ~62914560 states ~504392104 transitions
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 3/ 8), 956.415: Error: tree leafs table full! Change -s/--ratio.
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.460:
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.460: mean standard work distribution: 4.5% (states) 3.5% (transitions)
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461:
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Explored 66692490 states 607936282 transitions, fanout: 9.116
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Total exploration time 956.340 sec (956.290 sec minimum, 956.310 sec on average)
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: States per second: 69737, Transitions per second: 635690
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461:
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Progress states detected: 66865771
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Redundant explorations: -33.5678
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461:
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Queue width: 8B, total height: 57599397, memory: 439.45MB
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Tree memory: 1021.9MB, 10.7 B/state, compr.: 0.7%
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 74.0%/99.0%
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Stored 388 string chucks using 0MB
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pins2lts-mc-linux64( 0/ 8), 956.461: Est. total memory use: 1461.4MB (~1463.4MB paged-in)
WARNING : LTS min runner thread failed on error :java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected exception when executing ltsmin :cd /tmp/ltsmin16076430052256089098;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '[]((X(X(<>((LTLAPp0==true))))||[](!(LTLAPp1==true))||(!(LTLAPp1==true)&&<>((LTLAPp2==true)))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
255
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected exception when executing ltsmin :cd /tmp/ltsmin16076430052256089098;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '[]((X(X(<>((LTLAPp0==true))))||[](!(LTLAPp1==true))||(!(LTLAPp1==true)&&<>((LTLAPp2==true)))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
255
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.ltsmin.LTSminRunner.checkProperty(LTSminRunner.java:241)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.ltsmin.LTSminRunner$1.checkProperties(LTSminRunner.java:176)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.ltsmin.LTSminRunner$1.run(LTSminRunner.java:114)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:56:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:56:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:56:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:56:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:56:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 54 labels/synchronizations in 26 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:56:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLCardinality14261188941400430802.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:56:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLCardinality13048875975179008145.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLCardinality14261188941400430802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLCardinality13048875975179008145.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...278
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(((X(X(F("((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u30.p100==0)||(i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u39.p206==...371
Formula 0 simplified : F(XXG!"((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u30.p100==0)||(i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u39.p206==1))" ...347
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 297 ms
[2025-05-30 18:20:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 372 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:20:47] [INFO ] Transformed 383 places.
[2025-05-30 18:20:47] [INFO ] Transformed 372 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-30 18:20:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLCardinality17281601226296570446.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 18:20:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLCardinality7247519021170345118.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLCardinality17281601226296570446.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLCardinality7247519021170345118.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...343
Read 1 LTL properties
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
Checking formula 0 : !((G(((X(X(F("((p100==0)||(p206==1))"))))||(G(!("((p299==0)||(p221==1))"))))||((!("((p299==0)||(p221==1))"))&&(F("(p363!=1)"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : F(XXG!"((p100==0)||(p206==1))" & F"((p299==0)||(p221==1))" & ("((p299==0)||(p221==1))" | G!"(p363!=1)"))

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400515"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-05b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;