Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400514.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400514
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748625659165

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 83 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Transformed 482 places.
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Transformed 480 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 482 places and 480 transitions and 1120 arcs in 175 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 101 out of 482 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 480/480 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 437 transition count 435
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 437 transition count 435
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 437 transition count 429
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 419 transition count 411
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 419 transition count 411
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 417 transition count 409
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 417 transition count 409
Applied a total of 136 rules in 121 ms. Remains 417 /482 variables (removed 65) and now considering 409/480 (removed 71) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 409 rows 417 cols
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 27 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 359 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:21:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 284 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 673 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 408 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/417 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 142 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 76 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 101 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 87 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 92 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 100 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 107 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 417/826 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/417 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 408/408 constraints, Known Traps: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/416 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/417 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 101/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 20/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 20/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 12/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 15/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 15/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 110 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60113ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 408 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60128ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 417/482 places, 409/480 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60940 ms. Remains : 417/482 places, 409/480 transitions.
Support contains 101 out of 417 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 409 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 417 places (down from 101) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (161 resets) in 1545 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 15/80 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
[2025-05-30 17:22:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 338/360 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/392 variables, 5/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/417 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 409/826 variables, 417/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 0/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/826 variables, 0/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 826/826 variables, and 451 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 819 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 417/417 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 338/360 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/392 variables, 5/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 5/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/392 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 25/417 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 76 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 92 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 20/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 5/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 409/826 variables, 417/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/826 variables, 15/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 826/826 variables, and 505 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 5008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 417/417 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5832ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 22 out of 417 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 133 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 133 transitions
Performed 133 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 133
Iterating post reduction 0 with 133 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 417 transition count 276
Reduce places removed 133 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 153 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 284 transition count 256
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 274 transition count 250
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 268 transition count 250
Performed 46 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 46 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 268 transition count 204
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 222 transition count 204
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 414 place count 208 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 208 transition count 190
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 208 transition count 184
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 202 transition count 184
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 7 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 560 place count 142 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 561 place count 142 transition count 116
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 562 place count 142 transition count 115
Free-agglomeration rule applied 17 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 579 place count 142 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 596 place count 125 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 597 place count 124 transition count 97
Applied a total of 597 rules in 67 ms. Remains 124 /417 variables (removed 293) and now considering 97/409 (removed 312) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 124/417 places, 97/409 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1162 resets) in 506 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 5/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (262 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 1/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4109 steps (19 resets) in 7 ms. (513 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 409 transitions.
Computed a total of 113 stabilizing places and 113 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 390 transition count 382
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 390 transition count 382
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 390 transition count 378
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 381 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 381 transition count 369
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 378 transition count 366
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 377 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 377 transition count 365
Applied a total of 84 rules in 45 ms. Remains 377 /417 variables (removed 40) and now considering 365/409 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 365 rows 377 cols
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 222 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 348 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 364 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/377 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 4/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 4/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 14/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 377/742 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/377 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 364/364 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/377 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 82/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 13/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 365/742 variables, 377/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/742 variables, 364/870 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 91 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/742 variables, 20/890 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 742/742 variables, and 890 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 377/377 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 364/364 constraints, Known Traps: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60075ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 364 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60077ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 377/417 places, 365/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60471 ms. Remains : 377/417 places, 365/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 365 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12542829845372015930.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3908866988856463193.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12542829845372015930.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3908866988856463193.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5574744209523298794.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5574744209523298794.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5574744209523298794.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5574744209523298794.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5574744209523298794.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 72 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4327882677181066986.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12870218049587893412.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4327882677181066986.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12870218049587893412.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.18184e+27,0.762916,35904,4598,25,65009,348,707,91627,39,1017,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(((i6.i1.u36.p120==0)||(i6.i1.u122.p384==0))) + E((A(AX((i9.i2.u56.p200==1)) U A((i1.u52.p186==1) U (i12.i1.u73.p265==1))) * AG((i9...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U ((i6.i1.u36.p120==0)||(i6.i1.u122.p384==0))) + E((!((E(!(!((E(!((i12.i1.u73.p265==1)) U (!(...598
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t125, t128, t151, t154, t192, t207, t214, t236, t258, t273, t351, t352, t353, t354, t356, t35...983
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 152 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 152 transitions
Performed 152 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 152
Iterating post reduction 0 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 416 transition count 256
Reduce places removed 152 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 264 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 254 transition count 236
Performed 50 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 50 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 254 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 434 place count 204 transition count 186
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 456 place count 182 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 478 place count 182 transition count 164
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 478 place count 182 transition count 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 492 place count 175 transition count 157
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 600 place count 121 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 608 place count 121 transition count 95
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 624 place count 113 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 625 place count 112 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 640 place count 102 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 645 place count 97 transition count 81
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 645 place count 97 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 655 place count 92 transition count 76
Applied a total of 655 rules in 38 ms. Remains 92 /417 variables (removed 325) and now considering 76/409 (removed 333) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned [36, 53, 70, 74, 78, 82, 86, 91]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/417 places, 76/409 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 78 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 78 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 77 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 77 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 76 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 76 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 75 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 75 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 74 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 74 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 73 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 73 transition count 65
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 72 transition count 64
Applied a total of 24 rules in 18 ms. Remains 72 /84 variables (removed 12) and now considering 64/76 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 72 cols
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 72/417 places, 64/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 237 ms. Remains : 72/417 places, 64/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
RANDOM walk for 63 steps (2 resets) in 9 ms. (6 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11987138763188043936.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1484334346222196982.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11987138763188043936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1484334346222196982.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 392 transition count 384
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 392 transition count 384
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 392 transition count 381
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 383 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 383 transition count 372
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 380 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 380 transition count 369
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 379 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 379 transition count 368
Applied a total of 79 rules in 75 ms. Remains 379 /417 variables (removed 38) and now considering 368/409 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 379 cols
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 222 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 328 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 367 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 18/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 14/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 368/747 variables, 379/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 747/747 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 379/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 367/367 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 62/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 85 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 15/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 19/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 3/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 379/747 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/379 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/367 constraints, Known Traps: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60055ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60057ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 379/417 places, 368/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60461 ms. Remains : 379/417 places, 368/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3846558155744594604.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6417819753406348251.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3846558155744594604.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6417819753406348251.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13736794460463091689.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13736794460463091689.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13736794460463091689.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13736794460463091689.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13736794460463091689.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7055815196362259546.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3678211475173412226.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7055815196362259546.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3678211475173412226.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.96475e+27,1.63244,68412,9281,18,132510,269,748,192655,43,486,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((AG(!(((i11.u54.p199==1)&&(i4.u21.p60==1)))) * (i23.i0.u137.p437==1)) U AF(EG(EX((i24.i0.u144.p445==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(EG(EX((i24.i0.u144.p445==1)))))))) * !((!(E(TRUE U !(!(((i11.u54.p199==1)&&(i4.u21.p6...304
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t112, t115, t125, t128, t151, t154, t185, t194, t216, t231, t238, t253, t260, t356, t357, t35...940
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 391 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 391 transition count 383
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 391 transition count 379
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 383 transition count 371
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 383 transition count 371
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 381 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 381 transition count 369
Applied a total of 76 rules in 37 ms. Remains 381 /417 variables (removed 36) and now considering 369/409 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 369 rows 381 cols
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 221 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 339 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 368 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:26:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/381 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 13/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 8/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 13/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 9/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 381/750 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/381 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 368/368 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/381 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 63/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 12/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 11/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 3/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 1)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 1)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 1)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 1)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 1)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 1)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 1)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 1)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 1)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 1)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 1)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 1)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 1)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 1)
(s134 0)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 1)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 1)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 1)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 1)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 1)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 0)
(s176 1)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 0)
(s183 0)
(s184 1)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 1)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 0)
(s194 0)
(s195 0)
(s196 0)
(s197 1)
(s198 0)timeout

org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 381/750 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/381 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/368 constraints, Known Traps: 130/130 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 381/417 places, 369/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60427 ms. Remains : 381/417 places, 369/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 369 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5311138383704977298.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12147463100214137694.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5311138383704977298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12147463100214137694.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph556320505530269456.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph556320505530269456.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph556320505530269456.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph556320505530269456.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph556320505530269456.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 74 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4968512406280780374.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4046012024971520414.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4968512406280780374.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4046012024971520414.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.09479e+27,1.34272,56356,10578,14,106531,239,608,150256,28,451,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((AG(!(((i11.u63.p225==1)&&(i15.u91.p312==1)))) * AX(((i7.u41.p137!=1) * AF((i19.u140.p425==1))))) U !(AX(E((i12.u69.p250==1) U (i7.u...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(!(EX(!(E((i12.u69.p250==1) U (i7.u39.p132==1))))))) U (!((!(E(TRUE U !(!(((i11.u63.p225==1)&...377
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t125, t128, t138, t141, t164, t167, t193, t215, t240, t262, t277, t356, t357, t358, t360, t36...854
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 143 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 143 transitions
Performed 143 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 143
Iterating post reduction 0 with 143 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 416 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 143 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 159 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 273 transition count 249
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 265 transition count 244
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 260 transition count 241
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 259 transition count 241
Performed 49 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 49 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 259 transition count 192
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 210 transition count 192
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 442 place count 190 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 5 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 190 transition count 172
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 190 transition count 166
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 474 place count 184 transition count 166
Performed 53 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 53 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 106 rules applied. Total rules applied 580 place count 131 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 588 place count 131 transition count 105
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 604 place count 123 transition count 97
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 605 place count 123 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 122 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 6 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 615 place count 115 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 617 place count 113 transition count 94
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 617 place count 113 transition count 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 627 place count 108 transition count 89
Applied a total of 627 rules in 40 ms. Remains 108 /417 variables (removed 309) and now considering 89/409 (removed 320) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 108 cols
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [87, 92, 97, 102, 107]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/417 places, 89/409 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 100 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 100 transition count 86
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 96 transition count 82
Applied a total of 14 rules in 6 ms. Remains 96 /103 variables (removed 7) and now considering 82/89 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 96 cols
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 96/417 places, 82/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 229 ms. Remains : 96/417 places, 82/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1945187513533617292.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8898906622251213402.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1945187513533617292.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8898906622251213402.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.00244e+08,0.026334,4496,2,483,5,2891,6,0,467,2793,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(((p255==1)&&(p418==1))) U !(((!(E(((p271==1)&&(p220==1)) U AG((p283==1)))) + (p163==1)) + E(AG((p313==1)) U ((p283==1)||(p33==1))))...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,!(((p255==1)&&(p418==1)))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !((p313==1)))) U ((p283==1)||(p33==1))))) * !((p1...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t67, t74, t75, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,1,0.14531,10384,1,0,168,37529,186,75,2698,22642,174
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 390 transition count 382
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 390 transition count 382
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 390 transition count 379
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 383 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 383 transition count 372
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 380 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 380 transition count 369
Applied a total of 77 rules in 26 ms. Remains 380 /417 variables (removed 37) and now considering 369/409 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 369 rows 380 cols
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 219 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 324 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 368 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:28:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 66 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 13/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 9/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/749 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 368/368 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 86/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 8/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 10/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 3/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 369/749 variables, 380/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 749/749 variables, and 909 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 380/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 368/368 constraints, Known Traps: 127/127 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 380/417 places, 369/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60404 ms. Remains : 380/417 places, 369/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 369 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17124727612936394567.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11879671137965677035.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17124727612936394567.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11879671137965677035.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18053892212049991303.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18053892212049991303.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18053892212049991303.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18053892212049991303.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18053892212049991303.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 71 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16248479819806696988.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16309487920943852796.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16248479819806696988.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16309487920943852796.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.33852e+27,1.37549,55260,11193,18,103521,291,717,148997,42,588,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(E(AX(((i6.i1.u38.p127==1)||(i15.i0.u78.p281==1))) U (!(((i7.u32.p110==1)||(i17.i2.u161.p481==1))) * AX((i12.i1.u62.p232==1)))) U AF(...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(EG(!(EG((i3.u16.p48!=1)))))) U (!(E(!(EX(!(((i6.i1.u38.p127==1)||(i15.i0.u78.p281==1))))) U ...325
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t114, t124, t127, t151, t154, t185, t192, t214, t230, t237, t276, t356, t357, t358, t360, t36...956
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 152 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 152 transitions
Performed 152 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 152
Iterating post reduction 0 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 416 transition count 256
Reduce places removed 152 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 173 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 264 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 254 transition count 235
Performed 50 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 50 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 254 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 435 place count 204 transition count 185
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 456 place count 183 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 183 transition count 164
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 183 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 489 place count 177 transition count 158
Performed 55 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 599 place count 122 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 607 place count 122 transition count 95
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 623 place count 114 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 624 place count 113 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 639 place count 103 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 98 transition count 81
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 98 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 654 place count 93 transition count 76
Applied a total of 654 rules in 27 ms. Remains 93 /417 variables (removed 324) and now considering 76/409 (removed 333) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned [37, 54, 71, 75, 79, 83, 87, 92]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/417 places, 76/409 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 79 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 79 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 78 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 78 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 77 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 77 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 76 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 76 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 75 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 75 transition count 66
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 74 transition count 65
Applied a total of 22 rules in 7 ms. Remains 74 /85 variables (removed 11) and now considering 65/76 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 74 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 74/417 places, 65/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 184 ms. Remains : 74/417 places, 65/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14055072098092212537.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10403414152017858805.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14055072098092212537.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10403414152017858805.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36858e+07,0.019555,4320,2,227,5,2367,6,0,364,2602,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((p215==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((p215==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...163
(forward)formula 0,1,0.498632,29256,1,0,463,163354,154,243,2066,153136,627
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 151 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 151 transitions
Performed 151 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 151
Iterating post reduction 0 with 151 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 416 transition count 257
Reduce places removed 151 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 265 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 255 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 254 transition count 235
Performed 46 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 46 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 254 transition count 189
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 427 place count 208 transition count 189
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 448 place count 187 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 4 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 187 transition count 168
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 187 transition count 162
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 481 place count 181 transition count 162
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 589 place count 127 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 597 place count 127 transition count 100
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 613 place count 119 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 614 place count 118 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 5 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 629 place count 108 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 103 transition count 86
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 103 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 98 transition count 81
Applied a total of 644 rules in 27 ms. Remains 98 /417 variables (removed 319) and now considering 81/409 (removed 328) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 98 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [40, 57, 74, 78, 83, 87, 91]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/417 places, 81/409 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 86 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 86 transition count 76
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 86 /91 variables (removed 5) and now considering 76/81 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 86 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 11 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 86/417 places, 76/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 207 ms. Remains : 86/417 places, 76/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6901170963155344851.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16170666906363064026.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6901170963155344851.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16170666906363064026.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.20026e+07,0.033973,5004,2,551,5,4932,6,0,422,5730,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((p153==1) U ((!(AG(((p56==1)||(p144==1)))) * EF(((p152==1)&&(p448==1)))) * !(AF(((p412==1)&&(p480==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,(p153==1)) * (!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p56==1)||(p144==1)))))) * E(TRUE U ((p152==1)&&(p448==1))))),!((...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t50, t58, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inte...178
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 74/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 72/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.454396,23972,1,0,175,116069,193,85,2686,93645,201
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 153 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 153 transitions
Performed 153 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 153
Iterating post reduction 0 with 153 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 416 transition count 255
Reduce places removed 153 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 263 transition count 234
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 253 transition count 234
Performed 48 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 48 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 253 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 205 transition count 186
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 455 place count 183 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 183 transition count 164
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 183 transition count 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 491 place count 176 transition count 157
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 599 place count 122 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 607 place count 122 transition count 95
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 623 place count 114 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 624 place count 113 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 639 place count 103 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 98 transition count 81
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 98 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 654 place count 93 transition count 76
Applied a total of 654 rules in 30 ms. Remains 93 /417 variables (removed 324) and now considering 76/409 (removed 333) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [35, 52, 69, 73, 77, 81, 85]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/417 places, 76/409 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 81 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 81 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 80 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 80 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 79 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 79 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 78 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 78 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 77 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 77 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 76 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 76 transition count 66
Applied a total of 20 rules in 9 ms. Remains 76 /86 variables (removed 10) and now considering 66/76 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 76 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 76/417 places, 66/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 190 ms. Remains : 76/417 places, 66/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
RANDOM walk for 2992 steps (129 resets) in 13 ms. (213 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15966679469550683722.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3312367270282959869.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15966679469550683722.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3312367270282959869.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 393 transition count 385
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 393 transition count 385
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 393 transition count 381
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 387 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 387 transition count 375
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 385 transition count 373
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 385 transition count 373
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 384 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 384 transition count 372
Applied a total of 70 rules in 29 ms. Remains 384 /417 variables (removed 33) and now considering 372/409 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 372 rows 384 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:14] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:30:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 227 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 346 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 371 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/384 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 77 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 10/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 2/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 2/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30099ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 371 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30100ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/417 places, 372/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30476 ms. Remains : 384/417 places, 372/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 372 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5041728376641980332.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3806278386253602471.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5041728376641980332.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3806278386253602471.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14490299407548719777.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14490299407548719777.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14490299407548719777.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14490299407548719777.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14490299407548719777.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 73 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12442444522094731413.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5803051610130686638.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12442444522094731413.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5803051610130686638.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.99497e+27,2.08151,72836,13742,14,130385,250,672,210367,30,478,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!(AF(EX(E((i24.u161.p475==1) U (i0.u72.p253==1))))) U (i1.u59.p202==1)) + EX(((EF((i2.u21.p49==1)) + E((i16.u84.p287!=1) U ((i8.u37.p1...421
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!((i1.u59.p202==1))))) * !(E(!((i1.u59.p202==1)) U (!(!(!(EG(!(EX(E((i24.u161.p475==1) U (i0.u72...810
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t125, t128, t140, t143, t166, t169, t194, t212, t219, t234, t241, t263, t279, t359, t360, t36...908
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 391 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 391 transition count 383
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 391 transition count 379
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 382 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 382 transition count 370
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 379 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 379 transition count 367
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 378 transition count 366
Applied a total of 82 rules in 36 ms. Remains 378 /417 variables (removed 39) and now considering 366/409 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 366 rows 378 cols
[2025-05-30 17:31:44] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:31:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 217 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 334 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 365 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:31:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 67 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 65 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 5/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 4/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 4/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 378/744 variables, and 127 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 93/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 3/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 10/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 366/744 variables, 378/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 365/883 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/744 variables, 6/889 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 744/744 variables, and 889 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 378/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60040ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 378/417 places, 366/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60413 ms. Remains : 378/417 places, 366/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 366 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17916524361899284730.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11418406500201427735.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17916524361899284730.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11418406500201427735.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8736304348480407111.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8736304348480407111.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8736304348480407111.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8736304348480407111.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8736304348480407111.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 74 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10922636480656375223.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7605249165606759777.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10922636480656375223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7605249165606759777.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.00018e+27,0.796138,35080,8149,14,65553,234,669,69162,30,443,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(((EG((i19.u134.p411==1)) * (i16.i1.i1.u111.p359==1)) * (((i8.u40.p135==1)||(i19.u140.p424==1))||((i12.u65.p230==1)||(i16.i1.i0.u110...169
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((EG((i19.u134.p411==1)) * (i16.i1.i1.u111.p359==1)) * (((i8.u40.p135==1)||(i19.u140....227
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t112, t115, t138, t141, t164, t167, t193, t208, t215, t237, t259, t274, t353, t354, t355, t35...870
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 392 transition count 384
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 392 transition count 384
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 392 transition count 382
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 384 transition count 374
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 384 transition count 374
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 381 transition count 371
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 381 transition count 371
Applied a total of 74 rules in 22 ms. Remains 381 /417 variables (removed 36) and now considering 371/409 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 371 rows 381 cols
[2025-05-30 17:33:45] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:33:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 212 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 335 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 370 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:33:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/381 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 5/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 8/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30052ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 381/417 places, 371/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30412 ms. Remains : 381/417 places, 371/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 371 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6859957918051067783.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4630808004781408078.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6859957918051067783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4630808004781408078.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph707705357369800197.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph707705357369800197.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph707705357369800197.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph707705357369800197.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph707705357369800197.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 67 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16852763681973396641.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5786315886909335478.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16852763681973396641.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5786315886909335478.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.70574e+27,0.609599,29020,6540,18,52539,288,648,68241,42,505,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(AG((EF((i11.u45.p160==1)) * (i26.u156.p461==0))))) * AF(((((EX(((i19.i0.i0.u101.p344==0)||(i26.u157.p478==0))) * (i12.u52.p187==1)...554
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (i11.u45.p160==1)) * (i26.u156.p461==0)))))))))))] = FALSE * ...795
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t124, t127, t137, t140, t153, t184, t191, t206, t232, t241, t264, t279, t358, t359, t360, t36...877
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 143 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 143 transitions
Performed 143 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 143
Iterating post reduction 0 with 143 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 416 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 143 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 163 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 273 transition count 245
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 263 transition count 240
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 258 transition count 239
Performed 46 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 46 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 258 transition count 193
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 212 transition count 193
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 438 place count 193 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 193 transition count 174
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 193 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 465 place count 189 transition count 170
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 573 place count 135 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 581 place count 135 transition count 108
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 597 place count 127 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 598 place count 126 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 607 place count 119 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 609 place count 117 transition count 97
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 609 place count 117 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 617 place count 113 transition count 93
Applied a total of 617 rules in 33 ms. Remains 113 /417 variables (removed 304) and now considering 93/409 (removed 316) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 113 cols
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [67, 84, 90, 96, 100, 104, 112]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/417 places, 93/409 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 101 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 101 transition count 88
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 101 /106 variables (removed 5) and now considering 88/93 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 101 cols
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 101/417 places, 88/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 231 ms. Remains : 101/417 places, 88/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10419502813290141090.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7004485395301778060.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10419502813290141090.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7004485395301778060.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24963e+09,0.043729,5576,2,917,5,6995,6,0,493,7784,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p479==0) + (((!(E((((p46==1)&&(p398==1))||(p245!=1)) U A((p467==1) U (p217==1)))) * (p168==1)) * (AG(((p255==0)||(p418==0))) * AF((p...225
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p479==0))),(((p46==1)&&(p398==1))||(p245!=1))) * !(EG(!((p217==1))))) * !(E(!((...582
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t16, t19, t44, t58, t71, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...192
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 86/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,4.11963,153284,1,0,668,938109,218,309,3001,917677,738
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 151 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 151 transitions
Performed 151 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 151
Iterating post reduction 0 with 151 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 416 transition count 257
Reduce places removed 151 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 172 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 265 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 255 transition count 236
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 255 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 435 place count 204 transition count 185
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 456 place count 183 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 183 transition count 164
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 183 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 489 place count 177 transition count 158
Performed 55 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 599 place count 122 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 607 place count 122 transition count 95
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 623 place count 114 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 624 place count 113 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 639 place count 103 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 98 transition count 81
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 98 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 654 place count 93 transition count 76
Applied a total of 654 rules in 35 ms. Remains 93 /417 variables (removed 324) and now considering 76/409 (removed 333) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [37, 54, 71, 75, 79, 83, 87, 92]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/417 places, 76/409 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 79 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 79 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 78 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 78 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 77 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 77 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 76 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 76 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 75 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 75 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 74 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 74 transition count 65
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 73 transition count 64
Applied a total of 24 rules in 5 ms. Remains 73 /85 variables (removed 12) and now considering 64/76 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 73 cols
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 73/417 places, 64/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 192 ms. Remains : 73/417 places, 64/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8694019772192544069.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14528847331158342067.prop : 0 ms
RANDOM walk for 4162 steps (192 resets) in 14 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8694019772192544069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14528847331158342067.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 147 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 147 transitions
Performed 147 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 147
Iterating post reduction 0 with 147 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 416 transition count 261
Reduce places removed 147 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 165 rules applied. Total rules applied 312 place count 269 transition count 243
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 261 transition count 241
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 259 transition count 241
Performed 50 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 50 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 259 transition count 191
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 424 place count 209 transition count 191
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 446 place count 187 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 187 transition count 169
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 187 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 480 place count 181 transition count 163
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 588 place count 127 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 596 place count 127 transition count 101
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 612 place count 119 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 613 place count 118 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 5 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 626 place count 109 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 105 transition count 88
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 105 transition count 83
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 640 place count 100 transition count 83
Applied a total of 640 rules in 18 ms. Remains 100 /417 variables (removed 317) and now considering 83/409 (removed 326) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 100 cols
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [40, 59, 76, 80, 84, 90, 94, 99]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/417 places, 83/409 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 86 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 86 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 85 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 85 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 84 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 84 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 83 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 83 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 82 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 73
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 81 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 81 transition count 72
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 80 transition count 71
Applied a total of 24 rules in 5 ms. Remains 80 /92 variables (removed 12) and now considering 71/83 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 80 cols
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/417 places, 71/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 179 ms. Remains : 80/417 places, 71/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3446897747447656628.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7315576553115018401.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3446897747447656628.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7315576553115018401.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.97197e+07,0.01902,4360,2,221,5,1834,6,0,394,1846,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p264==1)&&(p152==1)) U EF(((p433!=1) * AF((p327==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(FwdU(Init,((p264==1)&&(p152==1))),TRUE) * (p433!=1)) * !(EG(!((p327==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 69/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 66/5/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.385134,22720,1,0,13,115982,29,7,2026,95809,15
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 417/417 places, 409/409 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 140 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 140 transitions
Performed 140 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 140
Iterating post reduction 0 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 416 transition count 268
Reduce places removed 140 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 159 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 276 transition count 249
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 266 transition count 243
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 260 transition count 241
Performed 48 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 48 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 260 transition count 193
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 212 transition count 193
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 437 place count 194 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 194 transition count 175
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 194 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 467 place count 188 transition count 169
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 575 place count 134 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 583 place count 134 transition count 107
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 599 place count 126 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 600 place count 125 transition count 98
Applied a total of 600 rules in 17 ms. Remains 125 /417 variables (removed 292) and now considering 98/409 (removed 311) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 125 cols
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [71, 89, 103, 109]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/417 places, 98/409 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 118 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 118 transition count 95
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 118 /121 variables (removed 3) and now considering 95/98 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 118 cols
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned [41, 43, 45, 47]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 114/417 places, 95/409 transitions.
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 114 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 91
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 110 /114 variables (removed 4) and now considering 91/95 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 110 cols
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 110/417 places, 91/409 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 456 ms. Remains : 110/417 places, 91/409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12522182048261527104.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16414522251890750469.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12522182048261527104.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16414522251890750469.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12572e+09,0.065946,6804,2,1524,5,11893,6,0,519,13767,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((p163==1) * (!(E(A((p34==1) U (p108==1)) U AG((p462==1)))) + EG(((p4==0)||(p349==0))))) + (AG(((p316==0)||(p480==0))) * (((p217==0)|...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((p163==1) * (!(E(!((E(!((p108==1)) U (!((p34==1)) * !((p108==1)))) + EG(!((p108==1))))) U !(E(TRU...297
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t4, t21, t24, t72, t79, t80, t82, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. ...201
(forward)formula 0,0,12.5692,426808,1,0,1333,2.27111e+06,232,679,3247,3.10754e+06,1421
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1741588498088051682.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1741588498088051682.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1741588498088051682.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1741588498088051682.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1741588498088051682.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 59 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17546171405446153068.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17986608156451569159.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17546171405446153068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17986608156451569159.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0637e+28,10.7823,331720,22894,30,590758,473,734,1.16774e+06,54,1296,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(((i7.u36.p120==0)||(i7.u132.p384==0))) + E((A(AX((i13.u60.p200==1)) U A((i2.u58.p186==1) U (i17.u81.p265==1))) * AG((i13.u60.p201=...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U ((i7.u36.p120==0)||(i7.u132.p384==0))) + E((!((E(!(!((E(!((i17.u81.p265==1)) U (!((i2.u58.p...559
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t129, t139, t142, t168, t171, t207, t216, t264, t273, t395, t396, t397, t398, i0.u143.t82, i0...1172
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-30 17:38:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:38:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:38:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 54 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:38:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9109945165507128479.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18353184137811936970.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9109945165507128479.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18353184137811936970.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:03:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 99 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 409 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:03:16] [INFO ] Transformed 417 places.
[2025-05-30 18:03:16] [INFO ] Transformed 409 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-30 18:03:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2880061173705127969.gal : 38 ms
[2025-05-30 18:03:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13825482526038459424.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2880061173705127969.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13825482526038459424.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0637e+28,395.8,7747824,2,1.20461e+06,5,2.336e+07,6,0,2079,5.00268e+07,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400514"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-05b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;