Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400513.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400513
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748625659422

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 87 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Transformed 482 places.
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Transformed 480 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:21:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 482 places and 480 transitions and 1120 arcs in 183 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Support contains 142 out of 482 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 482/482 places, 480/480 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 443 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 443 transition count 441
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 443 transition count 434
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 435 transition count 426
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 435 transition count 426
Applied a total of 101 rules in 105 ms. Remains 435 /482 variables (removed 47) and now considering 426/480 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 426 rows 435 cols
[2025-05-30 17:21:01] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 26 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 342 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:21:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 313 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 688 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 425 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/435 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 82 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 153 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 140 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 108 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 118 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 18/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30153ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 425 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30167ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 435/482 places, 426/480 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30982 ms. Remains : 435/482 places, 426/480 transitions.
Support contains 142 out of 435 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:32] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-30 17:21:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 17:21:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 426 transitions.
Support contains 130 out of 435 places (down from 142) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (162 resets) in 1853 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 15/82 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
[2025-05-30 17:21:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 369/394 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 16/410 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/435 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 426/861 variables, 435/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/861 variables, 0/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/861 variables, 10/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/861 variables, 0/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/861 variables, 0/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 861/861 variables, and 479 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 2491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 435/435 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 369/394 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 8/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/394 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 16/410 variables, 3/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/410 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/435 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 89 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 108 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 102 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 94 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 104 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 93 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 5/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 426/861 variables, 435/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/861 variables, 15/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/861 variables, 4/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 7594ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 25 out of 435 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 138 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 138 transitions
Performed 138 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 138
Iterating post reduction 0 with 138 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 435 transition count 288
Reduce places removed 138 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 155 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 297 transition count 271
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 287 transition count 264
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 280 transition count 263
Performed 48 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 48 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 280 transition count 215
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 232 transition count 215
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 430 place count 216 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 446 place count 216 transition count 199
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 446 place count 216 transition count 192
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 460 place count 209 transition count 192
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 8 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 584 place count 147 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 585 place count 147 transition count 121
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 147 transition count 120
Free-agglomeration rule applied 18 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 604 place count 147 transition count 102
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 622 place count 129 transition count 102
Applied a total of 622 rules in 67 ms. Remains 129 /435 variables (removed 306) and now considering 102/426 (removed 324) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 129/435 places, 102/426 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1109 resets) in 471 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 5/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (313 resets) in 117 ms. (338 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (309 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (311 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (315 resets) in 96 ms. (412 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (273 resets) in 114 ms. (347 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 129 cols
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/44 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 63/107 variables, 27/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 22/129 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 102/231 variables, 129/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 37/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 231/231 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 239 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/44 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 63/107 variables, 27/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 22/129 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 102/231 variables, 129/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 37/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 5/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 231/231 variables, and 210 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 546 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 792ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 4 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 29 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 5 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=14 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 8 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 426 transitions.
Computed a total of 127 stabilizing places and 127 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 156 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 156 transitions
Performed 156 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 156
Iterating post reduction 0 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 435 transition count 270
Reduce places removed 156 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 175 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 279 transition count 251
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 269 transition count 249
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 267 transition count 249
Performed 56 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 56 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 267 transition count 193
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 211 transition count 193
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 478 place count 190 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 4 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 499 place count 190 transition count 172
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 499 place count 190 transition count 164
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 515 place count 182 transition count 164
Performed 55 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 625 place count 127 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 127 transition count 100
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 118 transition count 91
Applied a total of 652 rules in 38 ms. Remains 118 /435 variables (removed 317) and now considering 91/426 (removed 335) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 118 cols
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned [36, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 69, 86, 92, 98, 104, 110, 117]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 83 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/435 places, 91/426 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 105 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 99 transition count 85
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 94 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 94 transition count 80
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 92 transition count 78
Applied a total of 26 rules in 10 ms. Remains 92 /105 variables (removed 13) and now considering 78/91 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/435 places, 78/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 286 ms. Remains : 92/435 places, 78/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5878385340467805994.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2558239687698013463.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5878385340467805994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2558239687698013463.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.70262e+08,0.060307,5704,2,1541,5,8688,6,0,440,7973,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((p0==1) U (p348==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((p0==1) U (p348==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t74, t75, t76, t77, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/int...179
(forward)formula 0,0,1.4802,59560,1,0,326,326071,182,191,2608,325022,288
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 407 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 407 transition count 398
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 407 transition count 395
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 392 transition count 380
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 392 transition count 380
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 387 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 387 transition count 375
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 382 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 382 transition count 370
Applied a total of 109 rules in 61 ms. Remains 382 /435 variables (removed 53) and now considering 370/426 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 370 rows 382 cols
[2025-05-30 17:21:43] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:21:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 225 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 355 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 369 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:21:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/382 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 69 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 17/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 72 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 12/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 15/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 14/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 382/752 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/382 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 369/369 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/382 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 78/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 164 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 132 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 3/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 370/752 variables, 382/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/752 variables, 369/907 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 752/752 variables, and 907 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 382/382 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 369/369 constraints, Known Traps: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60075ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60076ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 382/435 places, 370/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60493 ms. Remains : 382/435 places, 370/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 370 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6707180493915397640.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:22:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2619946457932021113.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6707180493915397640.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2619946457932021113.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15594381880949231617.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15594381880949231617.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15594381880949231617.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15594381880949231617.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15594381880949231617.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 71 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12188764106347861718.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13473727479888107160.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12188764106347861718.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13473727479888107160.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34655e+27,1.28927,54340,8358,22,103813,265,647,145137,39,545,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((((EG((i8.u9.p20==1)) * (((i18.i1.i1.u114.p357==0)||(i15.u87.p291==1))||(i0.u78.p266==1))) + ((EX(TRUE) * ((i16.u148.p440==0)||(i1.u...487
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU((Init * !(EG(((((i13.u2.p5==0)||(i4.u107.p340==1)) * !(!((E(!((i10.u158.p465!=1)) U (!(((i10.u53.p190...1303
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t128, t131, t141, t144, t168, t171, t197, t212, t219, t278, t356, t358, t359, t360, t361, t36...899
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 403 transition count 394
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 403 transition count 394
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 403 transition count 391
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 388 transition count 376
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 388 transition count 376
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 385 transition count 373
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 385 transition count 373
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 382 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 382 transition count 370
Applied a total of 109 rules in 43 ms. Remains 382 /435 variables (removed 53) and now considering 370/426 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 370 rows 382 cols
[2025-05-30 17:23:44] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:23:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 230 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 359 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 369 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:23:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/382 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 69 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 70 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 19/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 7/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 382/752 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/382 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 369/369 constraints, Known Traps: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/382 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 106/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 4/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 4/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 7/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 5/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 382/752 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/382 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/369 constraints, Known Traps: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 382/435 places, 370/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60458 ms. Remains : 382/435 places, 370/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 370 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13306477904326091919.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:24:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16539606532950409815.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13306477904326091919.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16539606532950409815.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10256809128827615182.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10256809128827615182.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10256809128827615182.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10256809128827615182.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10256809128827615182.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 73 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3403799404157469773.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10056469021820036316.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3403799404157469773.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10056469021820036316.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.80762e+27,1.90486,72000,6787,14,135033,223,669,214716,28,475,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!(((i16.u121.p380==0)||(i10.u53.p181==1))) U !(((((i10.u49.p179!=1)||(i6.i0.u101.p336==1))||((i0.i1.u78.p271==0)||(i22.i1.u138.p425==1...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY((Init * !(!((E(!(!(((((i10.u49.p179!=1)||(i6.i0.u101.p336==1))||((i0.i1.u78.p271==0)||(i22.i1.u138.p4...577
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t110, t113, t136, t139, t162, t165, t183, t190, t215, t241, t256, t263, t357, t358, t359, t36...942
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 407 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 407 transition count 398
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 407 transition count 395
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 395 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 395 transition count 383
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 392 transition count 380
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 392 transition count 380
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 389 transition count 377
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 389 transition count 377
Applied a total of 95 rules in 33 ms. Remains 389 /435 variables (removed 46) and now considering 377/426 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 377 rows 389 cols
[2025-05-30 17:25:45] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:25:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 241 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 384 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 376 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:25:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/388 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/389 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 98 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 6/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 16/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 389/766 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/389 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 376/376 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/388 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/389 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 51/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 20/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 2/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 75 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 70 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 19/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 18/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 93 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 5/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 389/766 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/389 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/376 constraints, Known Traps: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60070ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 376 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60071ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 389/435 places, 377/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60489 ms. Remains : 389/435 places, 377/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 377 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12762670455718881150.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13121753910143390456.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12762670455718881150.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13121753910143390456.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11718706472864284052.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11718706472864284052.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11718706472864284052.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11718706472864284052.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11718706472864284052.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 65 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8756372133858044675.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14433909947295576371.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8756372133858044675.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14433909947295576371.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.87845e+27,5.4817,192128,21476,25,348089,388,700,655217,43,956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 404 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 404 transition count 395
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 404 transition count 392
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 389 transition count 377
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 389 transition count 377
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 384 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 384 transition count 372
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 380 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 380 transition count 368
Applied a total of 113 rules in 27 ms. Remains 380 /435 variables (removed 55) and now considering 368/426 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 380 cols
[2025-05-30 17:27:46] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:27:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 222 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 344 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 367 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:27:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 72 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 83 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 67 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 68 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30032ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 380/435 places, 368/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30406 ms. Remains : 380/435 places, 368/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14724238257284558197.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6822785019417725332.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14724238257284558197.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6822785019417725332.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8060705757249998056.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8060705757249998056.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8060705757249998056.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8060705757249998056.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8060705757249998056.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 66 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7173423048505505018.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:28:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15857687889864002097.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7173423048505505018.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15857687889864002097.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.72113e+27,1.50509,63020,10520,16,120631,278,709,165121,38,537,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((i1.i3.u139.p434==1) * AX((AG(((i0.i2.u148.p452==0)||(i11.u51.p178==1))) * ((i3.u37.p126==1)||((i11.u48.p173!=0)&&(i9.i1.u39.p131!=1...238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U ((i1.i3.u139.p434==1) * !(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.i2.u148.p452==0)||(i11.u51.p178==1)))))...311
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t112, t115, t128, t154, t185, t192, t238, t253, t260, t276, t355, t356, t357, t358, t359, t36...952
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 402 transition count 393
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 402 transition count 393
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 402 transition count 390
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 385 transition count 373
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 385 transition count 373
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 380 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 380 transition count 368
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 376 transition count 364
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 376 transition count 364
Applied a total of 121 rules in 28 ms. Remains 376 /435 variables (removed 59) and now considering 364/426 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 364 rows 376 cols
[2025-05-30 17:29:16] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:29:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 226 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 352 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 363 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:29:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/376 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 74 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 8/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 19/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 376/740 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/376 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 363/363 constraints, Known Traps: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/376 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 107/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 12/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 74 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 6/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 364/740 variables, 376/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/740 variables, 363/898 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 740/740 variables, and 908 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 376/376 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 363/363 constraints, Known Traps: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 363 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60052ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 376/435 places, 364/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60433 ms. Remains : 376/435 places, 364/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 364 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2438078009459020151.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5484462313442134377.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2438078009459020151.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5484462313442134377.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14011020244365859687.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14011020244365859687.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14011020244365859687.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14011020244365859687.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14011020244365859687.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 70 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16119005903669358446.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5199355025055938128.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16119005903669358446.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5199355025055938128.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.97276e+27,0.342832,17428,3394,16,28661,254,708,33715,37,482,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(A(((i4.u22.p75==0)&&(i13.i2.u63.p238==1)) U AX((i3.u19.p56==1)))) * ((i8.u145.p448==0)||(i4.u22.p74==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((i3.u19.p56==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((i3.u19.p56==1))))) U (!(((i4.u22.p75=...299
(forward)formula 0,0,0.351452,17556,1,0,28661,254,717,33715,42,482,2961
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 405 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 405 transition count 396
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 405 transition count 393
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 391 transition count 379
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 391 transition count 379
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 387 transition count 375
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 387 transition count 375
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 383 transition count 371
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 383 transition count 371
Applied a total of 107 rules in 23 ms. Remains 383 /435 variables (removed 52) and now considering 371/426 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 371 rows 383 cols
[2025-05-30 17:30:47] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 372 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 370 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 71 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 75 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 72 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 15/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 383/754 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 370/370 constraints, Known Traps: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 98/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 10/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 371/754 variables, 383/528 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/754 variables, 370/898 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/754 variables, 8/906 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 754/754 variables, and 906 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 370/370 constraints, Known Traps: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 370 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 383/435 places, 371/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60456 ms. Remains : 383/435 places, 371/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 371 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9631011013020663407.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:31:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13604601818037364708.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9631011013020663407.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13604601818037364708.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10078761305925088568.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10078761305925088568.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10078761305925088568.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10078761305925088568.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10078761305925088568.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 75 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16706733220458279743.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4180347470459501152.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16706733220458279743.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4180347470459501152.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.72411e+27,1.06889,41584,10504,16,72655,253,727,110207,35,450,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(!(((i12.i0.u57.p206==0)||(i16.i0.u83.p280==1))) U EX((((i13.i0.u64.p224==0)||(i12.i1.u60.p217==0))||(i15.i0.u75.p267==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(((i12.i0.u57.p206==0)||(i16.i0.u83.p280==1))) U EX((((i13.i0.u64.p224==0)||(i12.i1.u60...201
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t123, t126, t138, t141, t164, t167, t213, t220, t235, t242, t279, t358, t359, t360, t362, t36...942
(forward)formula 0,0,21.0548,764180,1,0,1.88093e+06,253,4479,2.39885e+06,153,450,4614123
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 404 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 404 transition count 395
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 404 transition count 392
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 389 transition count 377
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 389 transition count 377
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 384 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 384 transition count 372
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 380 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 380 transition count 368
Applied a total of 113 rules in 33 ms. Remains 380 /435 variables (removed 55) and now considering 368/426 (removed 58) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 380 cols
[2025-05-30 17:32:39] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:32:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 216 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 341 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 367 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:32:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 11/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 99 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 102 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 16/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/748 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 367/367 constraints, Known Traps: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 108/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 7/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 2/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 15/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 368/748 variables, 380/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/748 variables, 367/921 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 748/748 variables, and 921 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 380/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 367/367 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 367 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 380/435 places, 368/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60438 ms. Remains : 380/435 places, 368/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality45915635855955632.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:33:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14996330468264081940.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality45915635855955632.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14996330468264081940.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4485189746718670457.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4485189746718670457.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4485189746718670457.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4485189746718670457.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4485189746718670457.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 71 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1972384024246589487.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16748421915983100676.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1972384024246589487.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16748421915983100676.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.59583e+27,1.91945,65320,9123,16,125497,274,633,185868,35,450,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(((i0.u76.p270==0)||(i9.u52.p171==1)) U ((i2.u19.p53==1) + EX(E(((i18.i0.i1.u105.p349==0)||(i6.u33.p106==1)) U (i3.u134.p412==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(((i0.u76.p270==0)||(i9.u52.p171==1)) U ((i2.u19.p53==1) + EX(E(((i18.i0.i1.u105.p349==0)||(i6.u...202
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t125, t128, t151, t154, t185, t192, t216, t254, t261, t355, t356, t357, t358, t359, t360, i0....873
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 404 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 404 transition count 395
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 404 transition count 392
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 389 transition count 377
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 389 transition count 377
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 385 transition count 373
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 385 transition count 373
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 381 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 381 transition count 369
Applied a total of 111 rules in 31 ms. Remains 381 /435 variables (removed 54) and now considering 369/426 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 369 rows 381 cols
[2025-05-30 17:34:40] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:34:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 222 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 372 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 368 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:34:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/381 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 57 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 91 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 81 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 5/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 12/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 10/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 65 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 62 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 381/750 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/381 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 368/368 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/381 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 84/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 20/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 12/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 62 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 6/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 70 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 7/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 4/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 1)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 timeout
0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 381/750 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/381 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/368 constraints, Known Traps: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60055ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60057ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 381/435 places, 369/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60460 ms. Remains : 381/435 places, 369/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 369 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9989493849595940007.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8624011258780831733.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9989493849595940007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8624011258780831733.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10034463385521691344.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10034463385521691344.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10034463385521691344.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10034463385521691344.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10034463385521691344.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 71 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6030148709563007818.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality876522871237574606.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6030148709563007818.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality876522871237574606.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.84214e+27,1.58293,55532,9100,14,106892,222,689,138588,28,453,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((!(AF((i20.i0.u128.p402==0))) * EX((!(((i17.i0.u96.p326==0)||(i13.i2.u67.p235==1))) * EF(((i23.i1.u151.p458==0)||(i25.u124.p392==1)))...411
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!((!(!(EG(!((i20.i0.u128.p402==0))))) * EX((!(((i17.i0.u96.p326==0)||(i13.i2.u67.p235==1...762
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t115, t125, t128, t141, t151, t154, t185, t192, t207, t214, t232, t239, t261, t276, t356, t35...962
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 139 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 139 transitions
Performed 139 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 139
Iterating post reduction 0 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 434 transition count 286
Reduce places removed 139 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 148 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 295 transition count 277
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 297 place count 291 transition count 271
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 285 transition count 271
Performed 52 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 52 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 285 transition count 219
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 233 transition count 219
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 429 place count 211 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 211 transition count 197
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 211 transition count 196
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 211 transition count 187
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 470 place count 202 transition count 187
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 578 place count 148 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 587 place count 148 transition count 124
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 605 place count 139 transition count 115
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 138 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 611 place count 133 transition count 114
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 611 place count 133 transition count 109
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 621 place count 128 transition count 109
Applied a total of 621 rules in 48 ms. Remains 128 /435 variables (removed 307) and now considering 109/426 (removed 317) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 128 cols
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [61, 78, 109, 114, 127]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/435 places, 109/426 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 123 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 122 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 120 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 120 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 119 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 119 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 118 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 118 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 117 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 117 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 116 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 116 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 115 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 115 transition count 101
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 112 transition count 98
Applied a total of 22 rules in 16 ms. Remains 112 /123 variables (removed 11) and now considering 98/109 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 112 cols
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 112/435 places, 98/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 306 ms. Remains : 112/435 places, 98/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4782355880530627742.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12509775979570606263.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4782355880530627742.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12509775979570606263.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.25804e+11,0.097034,8088,2,1618,5,17591,6,0,542,22757,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AF(((((((p251==0)||(p228==1))&&(p423==1))&&(((p203==0)||(p462==1))&&((p292==0)||(p42==1))))||((p232==0)&&(p20==1)))||(p409==0))) + E...282
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!(((((((p251==0)||(p228==1))&&(p423==1))&&(((p203==0)||(p462==1))&&((p292==0)||(p42==1))))||...410
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t8, t32, t70, t89, t95, t97, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroye...192
(forward)formula 0,0,0.82127,38104,1,0,188,177277,228,94,3352,137511,214
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 404 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 404 transition count 395
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 404 transition count 392
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 388 transition count 376
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 388 transition count 376
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 383 transition count 371
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 383 transition count 371
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 378 transition count 366
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 378 transition count 366
Applied a total of 117 rules in 53 ms. Remains 378 /435 variables (removed 57) and now considering 366/426 (removed 60) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 366 rows 378 cols
[2025-05-30 17:36:42] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:36:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 255 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 383 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 365 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:36:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 8/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 7/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 378/744 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 365/365 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/378 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 76/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 5/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 69 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 16/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 5/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 6/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 86 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 5/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 378/744 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/378 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/365 constraints, Known Traps: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 365 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 378/435 places, 366/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60480 ms. Remains : 378/435 places, 366/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 366 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17568792439574180415.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14448388537065322652.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17568792439574180415.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14448388537065322652.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9402066870561164431.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9402066870561164431.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9402066870561164431.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9402066870561164431.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9402066870561164431.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 70 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6599688221398841833.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17426215321242963232.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6599688221398841833.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17426215321242963232.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.25072e+27,1.17598,51652,8360,24,100331,348,671,142422,42,850,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((E((AX((i10.u45.p158==1)) * (i14.u132.p417!=1)) U ((((i19.u116.p376==0)||(i11.u51.p178==1))&&(i19.u115.p373==0))&&((i10.u45.p158==1...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((E((!(EX(!((i10.u45.p158==1)))) * (i14.u132.p417!=1)) U ((((i19.u116.p376==0)||(i11.u5...284
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t126, t129, t139, t142, t152, t168, t186, t193, t208, t215, t237, t259, t274, t353, t354, t35...908
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 405 transition count 396
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 405 transition count 396
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 405 transition count 394
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 390 transition count 379
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 390 transition count 379
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 385 transition count 374
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 385 transition count 374
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 380 transition count 369
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 380 transition count 369
Applied a total of 112 rules in 33 ms. Remains 380 /435 variables (removed 55) and now considering 369/426 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 369 rows 380 cols
[2025-05-30 17:38:43] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:38:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 203 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 335 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 368 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:38:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 72 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 11/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 97 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 4/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/749 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 368/368 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/380 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 59/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 6/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 3/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 7/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 82 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 4/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 380/749 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/368 constraints, Known Traps: 131/131 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 368 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60043ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 380/435 places, 369/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60412 ms. Remains : 380/435 places, 369/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 369 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5013101406953114259.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6070400231152170432.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5013101406953114259.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6070400231152170432.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8910618173907893159.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8910618173907893159.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8910618173907893159.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8910618173907893159.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8910618173907893159.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11458084532639942384.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9040904228573712454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11458084532639942384.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9040904228573712454.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.26617e+27,1.0043,42084,8993,18,78039,300,708,105251,40,616,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(A(!((AG((i9.u47.p168==1)) * (i24.i0.u140.p428==1))) U (i7.i0.u30.p99==1))) * EX((E((((i13.i0.u2.p7==0)||(i14.i0.u77.p276==1))||(i8.u4...308
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY((Init * EG(!((E(!((i7.i0.u30.p99==1)) U (!(!((!(E(TRUE U !((i9.u47.p168==1)))) * (i24.i0.u140.p428==...754
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t115, t125, t128, t152, t155, t165, t168, t193, t208, t215, t239, t277, t357, t358, t359, t36...946
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 404 transition count 395
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 404 transition count 395
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 404 transition count 392
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 390 transition count 378
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 390 transition count 378
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 386 transition count 374
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 386 transition count 374
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 382 transition count 370
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 382 transition count 370
Applied a total of 109 rules in 37 ms. Remains 382 /435 variables (removed 53) and now considering 370/426 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 370 rows 382 cols
[2025-05-30 17:40:43] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:40:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 319 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 369 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:40:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/382 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 5/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 3/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 382/752 variables, and 111 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/382 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 369/369 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/382 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 77/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 7/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 370/752 variables, 382/521 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/752 variables, 369/890 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 117 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 109 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 108 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 752/752 variables, and 905 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 382/382 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 369/369 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 369 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 382/435 places, 370/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60408 ms. Remains : 382/435 places, 370/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 370 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13161558545937574506.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:41:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3408077810487750883.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13161558545937574506.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3408077810487750883.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17938047537444168304.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17938047537444168304.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17938047537444168304.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17938047537444168304.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17938047537444168304.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 73 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6686124307731937418.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality593470516452293675.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6686124307731937418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality593470516452293675.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.49192e+27,2.77065,102716,10728,16,207914,257,642,305825,36,476,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(E(((EF(((i14.u84.p293==0)||(i0.u82.p286==1))) * (i21.u139.p443!=1)) * EX((i0.u150.p451==1))) U AX(((i7.u33.p98==0)||(i19.u129.p404==1...345
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EG(E(((E(TRUE U ((i14.u84.p293==0)||(i0.u82.p286==1))) * (i21.u139.p443!=1)) * EX((i0.u150.p451=...411
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t111, t114, t128, t138, t141, t154, t185, t192, t229, t236, t252, t259, t357, t358, t359, t36...853
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 157 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 157 transitions
Performed 157 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 157
Iterating post reduction 0 with 157 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 435 transition count 269
Reduce places removed 157 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 176 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 278 transition count 250
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 268 transition count 248
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 266 transition count 248
Performed 55 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 55 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 266 transition count 193
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 211 transition count 193
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 478 place count 190 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 4 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 499 place count 190 transition count 172
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 499 place count 190 transition count 165
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 513 place count 183 transition count 165
Performed 56 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 625 place count 127 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 634 place count 127 transition count 100
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 118 transition count 91
Applied a total of 652 rules in 20 ms. Remains 118 /435 variables (removed 317) and now considering 91/426 (removed 335) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 118 cols
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [38, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 52, 69, 86, 92, 98, 104, 110, 117]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/435 places, 91/426 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 104 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 85
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 92 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 92 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 91 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 91 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 90 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 90 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 89 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 89 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 88 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 88 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 87 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 87 transition count 74
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 86 transition count 73
Applied a total of 36 rules in 8 ms. Remains 86 /104 variables (removed 18) and now considering 73/91 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 86 cols
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 86/435 places, 73/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 241 ms. Remains : 86/435 places, 73/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15479830931915350476.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7648491651066655196.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15479830931915350476.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7648491651066655196.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.14991e+08,0.050341,6028,2,1383,5,9637,6,0,411,9287,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EG(AG(((p124==0)&&(p2==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((p124==0)&&(p2==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t69, t70, t71, t72, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/int...179
(forward)formula 0,0,0.565913,29240,1,0,145,153174,175,66,2496,85784,160
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 435/435 places, 426/426 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 157 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 157 transitions
Performed 157 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 157
Iterating post reduction 0 with 157 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 434 transition count 268
Reduce places removed 157 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 173 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 277 transition count 252
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 269 transition count 251
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 268 transition count 251
Performed 55 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 55 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 268 transition count 196
Deduced a syphon composed of 55 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 213 transition count 196
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 472 place count 191 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 494 place count 191 transition count 174
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 494 place count 191 transition count 165
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 512 place count 182 transition count 165
Performed 56 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 624 place count 126 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 633 place count 126 transition count 100
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 651 place count 117 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 116 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 659 place count 110 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 660 place count 109 transition count 89
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 660 place count 109 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 670 place count 104 transition count 84
Applied a total of 670 rules in 47 ms. Remains 104 /435 variables (removed 331) and now considering 84/426 (removed 342) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 104 cols
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [44, 61, 78, 82, 87, 92, 97, 103]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/435 places, 84/426 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 90 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 90 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 89 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 89 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 88 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 88 transition count 76
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 87 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 87 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 86 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 86 transition count 74
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 85 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 85 transition count 73
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 84 transition count 72
Applied a total of 24 rules in 7 ms. Remains 84 /96 variables (removed 12) and now considering 72/84 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 84 cols
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 84/435 places, 72/426 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 243 ms. Remains : 84/435 places, 72/426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3584103270227776670.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14289411077070027881.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3584103270227776670.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14289411077070027881.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.20963e+08,0.019979,4512,2,343,5,2531,6,0,402,2912,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((p265==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (p265==0)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t68, t70, t71, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
(forward)formula 0,1,0.13946,10400,1,0,141,33598,169,67,2472,28363,159
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16373823273031333964.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16373823273031333964.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16373823273031333964.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16373823273031333964.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16373823273031333964.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 60 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7644465653665639794.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:42:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality277746037204464983.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7644465653665639794.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality277746037204464983.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.22075e+28,11.6059,363120,29072,24,641568,407,833,1.22459e+06,46,1158,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((((EG((i8.i0.u8.p20==1)) * (((i19.i0.u134.p357==0)||(i18.i1.u108.p291==1))||(i0.i1.u96.p266==1))) + ((EX(TRUE) * ((i23.i1.u169.p440=...532
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU((Init * !(EG(((((i18.i0.u1.p5==0)||(i2.u126.p340==1)) * !(!((E(!((i10.u178.p465!=1)) U (!(((i10.u66.p...1390
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t146, t175, t225, t247, t256, t333, t414, t415, t416, t417, t418, i0.t161, i0.i1.u92.t32, i0....1332
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 54 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10747933170909587553.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:48:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7741879174516078045.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10747933170909587553.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7741879174516078045.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 18:15:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 171 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 426 transitions.
[2025-05-30 18:15:44] [INFO ] Transformed 435 places.
[2025-05-30 18:15:44] [INFO ] Transformed 426 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-30 18:15:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15306529662614478623.gal : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 18:15:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3932296645606714654.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15306529662614478623.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3932296645606714654.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-05b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400513"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-05b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;