fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r002-tall-174853729400506
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for AutoFlight-PT-05a

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 130513.00 0.00 0.00 FFTTFFFFTTTFTTFT normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400506.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-05a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400506
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 524K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 108K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748625469970

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-05a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:17:51] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:17:51] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:17:51] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 58 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:51] [INFO ] Transformed 132 places.
[2025-05-30 17:17:51] [INFO ] Transformed 130 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:17:51] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:17:51] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 132 places and 130 transitions and 420 arcs in 143 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 25 transitions.
Support contains 99 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 132 cols
[2025-05-30 17:17:51] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned [50, 99]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 264 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 130/132 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 289 ms. Remains : 130/132 places, 105/105 transitions.
Support contains 99 out of 130 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:17:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 82 to 76
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1207 resets) in 1508 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 9/76 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (181 resets) in 203 ms. (196 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (186 resets) in 175 ms. (227 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (224 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (180 resets) in 179 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (189 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (177 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (137 resets) in 266 ms. (149 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (135 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (181 resets) in 110 ms. (360 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:17:53] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 70/100 variables, 17/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 70/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 2/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/130 variables, 15/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 30/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 105/235 variables, 130/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 24/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved in 385 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 130/130 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 76/79 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 76/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 51/130 variables, 28/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 51/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 105/235 variables, 130/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 24/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 320 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved in 341 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 130/130 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/9 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 764ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 12 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 4 ms.
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 17:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:53] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 17:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
Support contains 83 out of 130 places (down from 84) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 10 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 130 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 117 transition count 92
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 117 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 109 transition count 84
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 100 transition count 75
Applied a total of 60 rules in 28 ms. Remains 100 /130 variables (removed 30) and now considering 75/105 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 100 cols
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 197 ms returned [5, 10, 15, 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 52, 74, 80, 86, 92, 97, 99]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 200 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/130 places, 75/105 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 29 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 29 transitions
Performed 29 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 29
Iterating post reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 79 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 50 transition count 46
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 44 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 44 transition count 40
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 43 transition count 39
Applied a total of 72 rules in 8 ms. Remains 43 /79 variables (removed 36) and now considering 39/75 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 43 cols
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 43/130 places, 39/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 312 ms. Remains : 43/130 places, 39/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12592980200627643229.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2430621722152026169.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12592980200627643229.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2430621722152026169.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,30721,0.024,4084,2,404,5,1744,6,0,213,1657,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((p27==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((p27==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t32, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,0,0.121098,9332,1,0,146,27047,106,85,1284,35357,142
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 38, 41, 44, 47, 76, 109, 121, 127]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 175 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 116 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 116 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 115 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 115 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 114 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 114 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 113 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 113 transition count 99
Applied a total of 12 rules in 22 ms. Remains 113 /119 variables (removed 6) and now considering 99/105 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 113 cols
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 113/130 places, 99/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 353 ms. Remains : 113/130 places, 99/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12937090269371744889.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15664978999092002319.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12937090269371744889.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15664978999092002319.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.56944e+07,0.26813,14844,2,3889,5,40347,6,0,549,55515,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(AX(((p66==1) * EX((p10==1))))) U (((p28==1)&&(p82==1)) + (A(((p16!=1)||((((p105==1)&&(p130==1))&&((p34==1)&&(p118==1)))&&(p131==1)))...259
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((p28==1)&&(p82==1)) + (!((E(!((!(EX(!((p87==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !((p20==1)))))) U (!(((p16!=1)...1601
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t45, t57, t60, Intersection with reachable a...223
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:18:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:18:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4728414535480263783.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4728414535480263783.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4728414535480263783.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4728414535480263783.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4728414535480263783.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:18:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:18:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:18:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 7 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:18:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7705395694597530668.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9029300222594063905.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7705395694597530668.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9029300222594063905.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.56944e+07,0.040909,5196,175,51,2240,469,282,2747,62,830,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(AX(((i7.i2.u23.p66==1) * EX((i0.u2.p10==1))))) U (((i5.u16.p28==1)&&(i6.i0.u17.p82==1)) + (A(((i0.u4.p16!=1)||((((u44.p105==1)&&(u44...376
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((i5.u16.p28==1)&&(i6.i0.u17.p82==1)) + (!((E(!((!(EX(!((i6.i1.u29.p87==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !((...2202
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t57, i0.u2.t20, i0.u4.t16, i1.i0.u5.t14, i2.u6.t12, i2.u8.t8, i3.i0.u7.t10, i4.i0.u9.t6,...308
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.04031,87500,1,0,167576,772,1743,251868,360,1340,203634
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 76, 103, 109, 115, 121, 127, 129]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 230 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 101 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 100 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 100 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 99 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 99 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 98 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 98 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 97 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 97 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 96 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 96 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 95 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 95 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 94 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 94 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 93 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 93 transition count 84
Applied a total of 42 rules in 27 ms. Remains 93 /114 variables (removed 21) and now considering 84/105 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 249 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/130 places, 84/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 508 ms. Remains : 93/130 places, 84/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8185282209066225150.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12373885837666903832.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8185282209066225150.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12373885837666903832.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.96325e+07,0.207302,13384,2,1122,5,31746,6,0,458,58770,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((p12==1) * EX(((p8==1)&&(p73==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p12==1) * EX(((p8==1)&&(p73==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,0.398523,17392,1,0,169,76338,190,85,2675,58770,183
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 212 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 38, 41, 44, 47, 76, 103, 109, 115, 121, 127, 129]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 226 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 106 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 105 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 105 transition count 95
Applied a total of 20 rules in 10 ms. Remains 105 /115 variables (removed 10) and now considering 95/105 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 105 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 105/130 places, 95/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 411 ms. Remains : 105/130 places, 95/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17990246838605553560.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17775473279032081252.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17990246838605553560.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17775473279032081252.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.9993e+07,0.138581,10940,2,1347,5,25587,6,0,515,41337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(AX(((p35==0)||(p83==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(EX(!(((p35==0)||(p83==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t44, t55, t59, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,0.373535,18560,1,0,180,74592,213,97,2934,54262,204
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:28] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 76, 103, 109, 115, 121, 127, 129]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 205 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 106 transition count 96
Applied a total of 18 rules in 6 ms. Remains 106 /115 variables (removed 9) and now considering 96/105 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 106 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 106/130 places, 96/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 332 ms. Remains : 106/130 places, 96/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability402369117488301180.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3514064392151488055.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability402369117488301180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3514064392151488055.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.00257e+07,0.151206,11200,2,1409,5,26064,6,0,520,42949,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(((AX((p6==0)) + EX(((p18==0)||(p96==0)))) + (((p22==0)||(p75==0))&&((p28==0)||(p55==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(((!(EX(!((p6==0)))) + EX(((p18==0)||(p96==0)))) + (((p22==0)||(p75==0))&&((p28==0)||(p55==0))))))]...164
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t45, t57, t60, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,2.30114,94244,1,0,411,460381,217,266,2964,656804,378
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned [14, 35, 41, 47, 76, 103, 109, 115, 121, 127, 129]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 161 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 113 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 113 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 112 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 112 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 111 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 111 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 110 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 110 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 109 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 109 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 108 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 108 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 107 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 107 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 106 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 106 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 105 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 105 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 104 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 104 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 103 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 103 transition count 89
Applied a total of 32 rules in 32 ms. Remains 103 /119 variables (removed 16) and now considering 89/105 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 103 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 11 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/130 places, 89/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 310 ms. Remains : 103/130 places, 89/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17532910644365294511.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1690375936098679071.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17532910644365294511.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1690375936098679071.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.97964e+07,0.118828,9716,2,1466,5,21684,6,0,493,33126,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(((p38==1)&&(p104==1))) * E(((p24!=1) + EX((p65==1))) U (!((AF(((p44==1)&&(p116==1))) * (((p13==1)&&(p108==1))||((p3==1)&&(p101==1)))...287
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((FwdU(Init,(!(((p38==1)&&(p104==1))) * E(((p24!=1) + EX((p65==1))) U (!((!(EG(!(((p44==1)&&(p116==1))))) *...345
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t43, t58, t75, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,7.47708,263824,1,0,1310,1.61086e+06,227,721,2911,1.72025e+06,1493
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 217 ms returned [7, 21, 28, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 76, 103, 109, 115, 121, 127, 129]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 218 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 108 transition count 98
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 108 /115 variables (removed 7) and now considering 98/105 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 108 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/130 places, 98/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 349 ms. Remains : 108/130 places, 98/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7535337434883198488.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10278341618434674279.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7535337434883198488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10278341618434674279.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.00913e+07,0.113241,9164,2,1160,5,19774,6,0,530,31347,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(EX(AX(AX(((p14==1)&&(p53==1)))))) U EG(AF(((p14==1)&&(p80==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(((p14==1)&&(p53==1))))))))))))),!(EG(!(((p14==1)&&(p80==1))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t47, t61, t62, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,2.6419,105392,1,0,774,683067,234,382,3165,583167,888
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 76, 103, 109, 115, 121, 127, 129]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 274 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 108 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 108 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 107 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 107 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 106 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 105 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 105 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 104 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 103 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 103 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 102 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 102 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 101 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 101 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 100 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 100 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 99 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 99 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 98 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 98 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 97 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 97 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 96 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 96 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 95 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 95 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 94 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 94 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 93 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 93 transition count 84
Applied a total of 42 rules in 15 ms. Remains 93 /114 variables (removed 21) and now considering 84/105 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/130 places, 84/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 387 ms. Remains : 93/130 places, 84/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9273557495330125087.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13724877454251416977.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9273557495330125087.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13724877454251416977.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.96325e+07,0.20612,13388,2,1122,5,31746,6,0,458,58770,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E((p6==1) U !((EX(((p24==1)&&(p33==1))) + AF(AX(((p48==1)&&(p127==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E((p6==1) U !((EX(((p24==1)&&(p33==1))) + !(EG(!(!(EX(!(((p48==1)&&(p127==1)))))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, t48, t53, Intersection with reachable a...223
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,8.28452,267180,1,0,298,1.69808e+06,198,180,2747,1.13074e+06,343
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 103, 115, 121, 127, 129]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 217 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 113 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 113 transition count 101
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 113 /117 variables (removed 4) and now considering 101/105 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 113 cols
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 113/130 places, 101/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 345 ms. Remains : 113/130 places, 101/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7296403054901058096.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability439998399351203851.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7296403054901058096.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability439998399351203851.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.22624e+07,0.196226,12436,2,3255,5,33855,6,0,553,42281,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A((!(AF(((p29==1)&&(p76==1)))) + !(((p24==1)||((p77==1)&&(p130==1))))) U ((((EG((p26==1)) + (p5!=1)) + (((p13==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p115==...287
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(((((EG((p26==1)) + (p5!=1)) + (((p13==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p115==1))) * ((p33==1) + !(EX(!(((p18==...687
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t48, t91, Intersection with reachable at eac...219
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,27.8624,892432,1,0,1327,6.13151e+06,255,780,3642,4.11337e+06,1463
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:19] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 159 ms returned [7, 21, 38, 41, 44, 47, 76, 103, 109, 115, 121]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 161 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 116 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 116 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 115 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 115 transition count 101
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 115 /119 variables (removed 4) and now considering 101/105 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 115 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:19] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:19:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:19:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 115/130 places, 101/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 292 ms. Remains : 115/130 places, 101/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:19:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:19:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6361013678342418364.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14468113517290281039.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6361013678342418364.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14468113517290281039.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.576e+07,0.27186,15972,2,2911,5,43415,6,0,557,66978,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E((!(((!(((p10==1)&&(p107==1))||(p6==1)))&&(p0==1))) * ((!(((p8==1)&&(p73==1))) + AG(((p10==1)&&(p107==1)))) + ((EX(((p28==1)&&(p92==1)...611
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U ((p45==1)&&(p121==1)))) + !((((p35==1)&&(p56==1))||((((p112==1)&&(p13...1180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t47, t61, t62, Intersection with reachable a...224
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8323713141488755396.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8323713141488755396.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8323713141488755396.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8323713141488755396.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8323713141488755396.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16149821024705353301.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5994749912184525513.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16149821024705353301.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5994749912184525513.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.576e+07,0.040019,5428,182,34,2860,525,293,3994,53,1332,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(E((!(((!(((i0.u2.p10==1)&&(i8.u36.p107==1))||(i2.i1.u1.p6==1)))&&(i2.i0.u11.p0==1))) * ((!(((i0.u2.p8==1)&&(i0.u25.p73==1))) + AG(((i0....971
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U ((i10.u14.p45==1)&&(i10.u41.p121==1)))) + !((((i7.i1.u17.p35==1)&&(i3...1798
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u2.t20, i0.u5.t16, i1.u8.t10, i2.i1.u1.t22, i4.u0.t24, i5.u7.t12, i5.u9.t8, i7.i1.t47, i7....310
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.71472,77876,1,0,158913,1350,1918,221950,292,2248,192057
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 130 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 117 transition count 92
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 117 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 110 transition count 85
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 101 transition count 76
Applied a total of 58 rules in 16 ms. Remains 101 /130 variables (removed 29) and now considering 76/105 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 101 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:51] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned [5, 10, 21, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 53, 75, 81, 87, 93, 98, 100]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 224 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/130 places, 76/105 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 82 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 64 transition count 58
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 64 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 60 transition count 54
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 54 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 54 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 53 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 53 transition count 47
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 52 transition count 46
Applied a total of 60 rules in 9 ms. Remains 52 /82 variables (removed 30) and now considering 46/76 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 52 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/130 places, 46/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 343 ms. Remains : 52/130 places, 46/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1174894644963562077.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16356014669319217263.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1174894644963562077.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16356014669319217263.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,78849,0.017281,4544,2,564,5,3298,6,0,254,3523,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(EF(((p16==1)||((p21==1)&&(p69==1)))) U ((p36==1)&&(p103==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(E(TRUE U ((p16==1)||((p21==1)&&(p69==1)))) U ((p36==1)&&(p103==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t23, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,0.452119,25684,1,0,267,129473,123,162,1547,142992,257
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 196 ms returned [14, 21, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 76, 103, 109, 115, 127]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 197 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 114 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 114 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 113 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 113 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 112 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 112 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 111 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 111 transition count 98
Applied a total of 14 rules in 6 ms. Remains 111 /118 variables (removed 7) and now considering 98/105 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 111 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:52] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 111/130 places, 98/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 333 ms. Remains : 111/130 places, 98/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5635568891658359937.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2583493991468669982.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5635568891658359937.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2583493991468669982.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.38049e+07,0.152044,11412,2,2202,5,27290,6,0,540,41893,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((A(((EF(((p28==1)&&(p82==1))) * EF((p30==1))) * !(E(((p123==1)&&(p130==1)) U (p33==1)))) U ((EF(((p7==1)&&(p89==1))) + (p43==1)) + (((p...278
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!((E(!(((E(TRUE U ((p7==1)&&(p89==1))) + (p43==1)) + (((p18==1)&&(p96==1))||(p10==1)))) U (!(((E(T...964
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t45, t57, t60, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,0.632638,28512,1,0,274,135783,229,144,3153,105658,343
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 130 /130 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 130 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 76, 103, 109, 121, 127, 129]
Discarding 15 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 208 ms to find 15 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 110 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 110 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 108 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 108 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 107 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 107 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 106 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 106 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 105 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 105 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 104 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 104 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 103 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 103 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 102 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 102 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 101 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 101 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 100 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 100 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 99 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 99 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 98 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 98 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 97 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 97 transition count 87
Applied a total of 36 rules in 17 ms. Remains 97 /115 variables (removed 18) and now considering 87/105 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 97 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 97/130 places, 87/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 369 ms. Remains : 97/130 places, 87/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16322120969128459196.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15737731554357540263.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16322120969128459196.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15737731554357540263.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.15876e+07,0.213887,13836,2,1629,5,35460,6,0,477,57396,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AG(((EF((p20==1)) + EX((p3==1))) + ((p10==1)||(p65==1)))) * ((EG((p23==0)) + ((p117==1)&&(p130==1))) + (p20==1)))) + (AG(A(!(((p23==...302
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U (p20==1)) + EX((p3==1))) + ((p10==1)||(p65==1)))))) * ...927
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t8, t10, t12, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t40, t55, t69, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,5.68677,211352,1,0,739,1.35423e+06,206,370,2866,1.16122e+06,830
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 30 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 30 transitions
Performed 30 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 30
Iterating post reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 120 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 90 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 89 transition count 73
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 89 transition count 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 72 transition count 61
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 72 transition count 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 67 transition count 56
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 57 transition count 46
Applied a total of 130 rules in 15 ms. Remains 57 /130 variables (removed 73) and now considering 46/105 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 57 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:59] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [26, 38, 42, 46, 50, 54]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/130 places, 46/105 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 46 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 46 transition count 41
Applied a total of 10 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /51 variables (removed 5) and now considering 41/46 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 46 cols
[2025-05-30 17:19:59] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:19:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:19:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 46/130 places, 41/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 129 ms. Remains : 46/130 places, 41/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14860366758611534807.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8120513552956117188.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14860366758611534807.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8120513552956117188.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25600,0.009546,4036,2,154,5,1184,6,0,228,1232,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((p118==1)&&(p131==1))) * EF((p84==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((p118==1)&&(p131==1)))),TRUE) * (p84==0))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.025862,4932,1,0,10,6092,16,3,1122,3042,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 105/105 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 130 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 117 transition count 92
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 117 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 109 transition count 84
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 99 transition count 74
Applied a total of 62 rules in 6 ms. Remains 99 /130 variables (removed 31) and now considering 74/105 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 99 cols
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 218 ms returned [5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 51, 73, 79, 91, 96, 98]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 222 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/130 places, 74/105 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 22 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 22 transitions
Performed 22 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 22
Iterating post reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 79 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 57 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 52 transition count 47
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 52 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 50 transition count 45
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 45 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 45 transition count 40
Applied a total of 68 rules in 4 ms. Remains 45 /79 variables (removed 34) and now considering 40/74 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/130 places, 40/105 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 308 ms. Remains : 45/130 places, 40/105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16523794435111307061.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3689858578772442541.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16523794435111307061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3689858578772442541.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,23553,0.015902,4152,2,338,5,1873,6,0,222,1992,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AF(((p117==0)||(p130==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EG(!(((p117==0)||(p130==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.041909,5560,1,0,9,9520,21,5,1098,3852,9
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-05a-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 129020 ms.

BK_STOP 1748625600483

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-05a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-05a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400506"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-05a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-05a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;