Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400500.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-04b, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400500
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 156K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748624823767

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-04b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Transformed 390 places.
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Transformed 388 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 390 places and 388 transitions and 906 arcs in 168 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 30 out of 390 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 390/390 places, 388/388 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 342 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 342 transition count 340
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 342 transition count 333
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 325 transition count 316
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 325 transition count 316
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 323 transition count 314
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 323 transition count 314
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 321 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 321 transition count 312
Applied a total of 145 rules in 113 ms. Remains 321 /390 variables (removed 69) and now considering 312/388 (removed 76) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 312 rows 321 cols
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 276 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:07:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 229 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 536 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 311 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:07:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/321 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 176 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 204 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 18/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 10/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 1.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)timeout

(s71 0.0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30073ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 311 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30085ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 321/390 places, 312/388 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30752 ms. Remains : 321/390 places, 312/388 transitions.
Support contains 30 out of 321 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 312 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 25 to 22
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (196 resets) in 1741 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 5/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (18 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (18 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (18 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (18 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (17 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-05-30 17:07:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 130/138 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 162/300 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 21/321 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 7/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 312/633 variables, 321/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/633 variables, 1/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/633 variables, 0/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/633 variables, 0/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 633/633 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved in 1371 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 321/321 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 120/125 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 175/300 variables, 23/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 4/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 21/321 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 5/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 312/633 variables, 321/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/633 variables, 4/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/633 variables, 7/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/633 variables, 1/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/633 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/633 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 633/633 variables, and 371 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved in 1509 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 321/321 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/5 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2898ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 180 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=90 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 187 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 9 simplifications.
Computed a total of 88 stabilizing places and 88 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0)&&(p1||X(G(p2))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 321 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 321/321 places, 312/312 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 314 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 314 transition count 305
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 314 transition count 304
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 310 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 310 transition count 300
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 308 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 308 transition count 298
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 306 transition count 296
Applied a total of 31 rules in 39 ms. Remains 306 /321 variables (removed 15) and now considering 296/312 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 296 rows 306 cols
[2025-05-30 17:07:40] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:07:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 182 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 289 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 295 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:07:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 63 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 10/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 296/602 variables, 306/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 2/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 602/602 variables, and 410 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 76/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 296/602 variables, 306/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 295/705 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 12/717 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 1/718 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 602/602 variables, and 718 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60065ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 306/321 places, 296/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60394 ms. Remains : 306/321 places, 296/312 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 302 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), true]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-02 finished in 60764 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((F(p0) U p1)&&X(F(!p0)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 321 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 321/321 places, 312/312 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 312 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 312 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 312 transition count 302
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 308 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 308 transition count 298
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 306 transition count 296
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 304 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 304 transition count 294
Applied a total of 35 rules in 30 ms. Remains 304 /321 variables (removed 17) and now considering 294/312 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-30 17:08:41] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:08:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 224 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 293 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:08:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 115 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 6/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 11/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 598/598 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 82/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 293/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 2/712 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 598/598 variables, and 719 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60052ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/321 places, 294/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60412 ms. Remains : 304/321 places, 294/312 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 221 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), p0]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1018 steps with 5 reset in 13 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-03 finished in 60669 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 321 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 321/321 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 111 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 111 transitions
Performed 111 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 111
Iterating post reduction 0 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 320 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 111 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 209 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 203 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 202 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 201 transition count 187
Performed 40 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 40 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 201 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 161 transition count 147
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 329 place count 155 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 155 transition count 141
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 155 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 152 transition count 138
Performed 58 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 8 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 58 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 94 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 93 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 87 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 85 transition count 69
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 85 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 476 place count 81 transition count 65
Applied a total of 476 rules in 48 ms. Remains 81 /321 variables (removed 240) and now considering 65/312 (removed 247) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 81 cols
[2025-05-30 17:09:41] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [33, 47, 61, 66, 70, 74, 80]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/321 places, 65/312 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 69 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 69 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 68 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 68 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 67 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 67 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 66 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 66 transition count 57
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 65 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 65 transition count 56
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 64 transition count 55
Applied a total of 20 rules in 9 ms. Remains 64 /74 variables (removed 10) and now considering 55/65 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 64 cols
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 64/321 places, 55/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 219 ms. Remains : 64/321 places, 55/312 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 60 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-06
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 60 steps with 4 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-06 finished in 296 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0&&(p0 U (X((p1||X(!p0)))||G(p0)))))))'
Support contains 1 out of 321 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 321/321 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 320 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 208 transition count 186
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 200 transition count 185
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 199 transition count 185
Performed 40 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 40 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 199 transition count 145
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 159 transition count 145
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 333 place count 153 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 153 transition count 139
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 153 transition count 137
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 151 transition count 137
Performed 56 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 8 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 95 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 94 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 87 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 84 transition count 69
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 84 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 80 transition count 65
Applied a total of 477 rules in 37 ms. Remains 80 /321 variables (removed 241) and now considering 65/312 (removed 247) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 80 cols
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [33, 47, 61, 65, 69, 73, 79]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/321 places, 65/312 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 68 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 68 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 67 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 67 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 66 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 66 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 65 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 65 transition count 57
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 64 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 64 transition count 56
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 63 transition count 55
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 63 /73 variables (removed 10) and now considering 55/65 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 63 cols
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 63/321 places, 55/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 200 ms. Remains : 63/321 places, 55/312 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4686 reset in 187 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 59104 steps with 2787 reset with depth 13 and stack size 13 in 87 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-08 finished in 530 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0 U G(!p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 321 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 321/321 places, 312/312 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 312 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 312 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 312 transition count 302
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 308 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 308 transition count 298
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 306 transition count 296
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 304 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 304 transition count 294
Applied a total of 35 rules in 52 ms. Remains 304 /321 variables (removed 17) and now considering 294/312 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 255 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 293 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 6/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 70 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 11/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 598/598 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 82/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 293/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 2/712 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 598/598 variables, and 719 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/321 places, 294/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60354 ms. Remains : 304/321 places, 294/312 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 129 ms :[p1, p1, true, p1]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 805 steps with 3 reset in 11 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-09 finished in 60518 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F((p0&&F(p1)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 321 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 321/321 places, 312/312 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 313 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 313 transition count 304
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 313 transition count 303
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 309 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 309 transition count 299
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 307 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 307 transition count 297
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 305 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 305 transition count 295
Applied a total of 33 rules in 51 ms. Remains 305 /321 variables (removed 16) and now considering 295/312 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-30 17:10:43] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:10:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 276 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 294 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:10:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 16/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 7/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 600/600 variables, and 409 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 76/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 4/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 294/719 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 1)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 1)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 1)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 1)
(s98 0)
(s99 1)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 1)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 1)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 1)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 1)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 1)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 1)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 1)
(s154 1)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 timeout
0)
(s161 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 600/600 variables, and 719 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/321 places, 295/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60376 ms. Remains : 305/321 places, 295/312 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 228 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 200 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-10 finished in 60628 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G((F(p0) U p1)) U X((p2&&X(F(!p3))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 321 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 321/321 places, 312/312 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 314 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 314 transition count 305
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 314 transition count 304
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 311 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 311 transition count 301
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 309 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 309 transition count 299
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 307 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 307 transition count 297
Applied a total of 29 rules in 30 ms. Remains 307 /321 variables (removed 14) and now considering 297/312 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 297 rows 307 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 188 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 286 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 296 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/307 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 15/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 7/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 4/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 7/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 2/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30081ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30082ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 307/321 places, 297/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30399 ms. Remains : 307/321 places, 297/312 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 353 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3)), (OR (NOT p2) p3), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p3), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), p3]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 39990 reset in 131 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 39991 reset in 147 ms.
Computed a total of 77 stabilizing places and 77 stable transitions
Computed a total of 77 stabilizing places and 77 stable transitions
Detected a total of 77/307 stabilizing places and 77/297 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/4 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p3)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 17 factoid took 16 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 17 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-11 finished in 31087 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 321 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 321/321 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 110 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 110 transitions
Performed 110 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 110
Iterating post reduction 0 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 320 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 110 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 123 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 210 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 202 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 201 transition count 187
Performed 40 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 40 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 201 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 161 transition count 147
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 329 place count 155 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 155 transition count 141
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 155 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 152 transition count 138
Performed 57 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 8 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 95 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 94 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 87 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 84 transition count 69
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 84 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 80 transition count 65
Applied a total of 477 rules in 24 ms. Remains 80 /321 variables (removed 241) and now considering 65/312 (removed 247) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 80 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:15] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [31, 45, 59, 69, 73, 79]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/321 places, 65/312 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 70 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 70 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 69 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 69 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 68 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 68 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 67 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 67 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 66 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 66 transition count 57
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 64 transition count 55
Applied a total of 20 rules in 6 ms. Remains 64 /74 variables (removed 10) and now considering 55/65 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 64 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:15] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 64/321 places, 55/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 64/321 places, 55/312 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4702 reset in 175 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4707 reset in 162 ms.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 66 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 215 steps (7 resets) in 7 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 110 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 3 out of 64 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 64/64 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 33 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/119 variables, 64/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 119/119 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 676 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/119 variables, 64/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 33/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 119/119 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 908 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1588ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1589ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1697 ms. Remains : 64/64 places, 55/55 transitions.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 79 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 77 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 117 steps (2 resets) in 4 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 118 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 77 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4685 reset in 121 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4695 reset in 130 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin7004582843968291885
[2025-05-30 17:12:18] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 55 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:18] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:12:18] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 55 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:18] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:12:18] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 55 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:18] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:12:18] [INFO ] Built C files in 26ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin7004582843968291885
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7004582843968291885;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 237 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7004582843968291885;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 46 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin7004582843968291885;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10586794975225789639.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 3 out of 64 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 64/64 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 33 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:12:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/119 variables, 64/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 119/119 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 677 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/119 variables, 64/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 33/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 119/119 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 902 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1582ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1583ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1683 ms. Remains : 64/64 places, 55/55 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin14480012004145750510
[2025-05-30 17:12:35] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 55 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:35] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:12:35] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 55 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:35] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:12:35] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 55 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:35] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:12:35] [INFO ] Built C files in 9ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin14480012004145750510
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14480012004145750510;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 135 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14480012004145750510;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 33 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin14480012004145750510;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased8271651532485221274.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL16517610268146059410.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL15854588623026246358.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL16517610268146059410.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut14196256781164652626.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL15854588623026246358.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...320
Loading property file /tmp/LTL15854588623026246358.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut14196256781164652626.hoa
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t172.t166.t284.t167.t165.t23.t93.t303.t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled....202
Computing Next relation with stutter on 480 deadlock states
2 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
2 transitions explored
2 items max in DFS search stack
6 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,0.079644,17572,1,0,132,14043,138,66,1833,9923,188
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE HOA DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-13 finished in 35604 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0||((p1 U p2)&&G(p1))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 321 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 321/321 places, 312/312 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 110 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 110 transitions
Performed 110 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 110
Iterating post reduction 0 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 320 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 110 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 210 transition count 195
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 206 transition count 195
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 206 transition count 153
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 314 place count 164 transition count 153
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 320 place count 158 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 158 transition count 147
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 158 transition count 144
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 155 transition count 144
Performed 58 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 8 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 58 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 448 place count 97 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 449 place count 96 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 91 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 90 transition count 76
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 90 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 86 transition count 72
Applied a total of 464 rules in 26 ms. Remains 86 /321 variables (removed 235) and now considering 72/312 (removed 240) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 86 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [37, 51, 65, 70, 74, 79, 85]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/321 places, 72/312 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 74 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 74 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 73 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 73 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 72 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 72 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 71 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 70 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 70 transition count 63
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 69 transition count 62
Applied a total of 20 rules in 5 ms. Remains 69 /79 variables (removed 10) and now considering 62/72 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 69 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:12:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 69/321 places, 62/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 201 ms. Remains : 69/321 places, 62/312 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 157 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-15
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 33 steps with 1 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLFireability-15 finished in 380 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 345933 ms.

BK_STOP 1748625171014

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-04b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-04b, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400500"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-04b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-04b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;