fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r002-tall-174853729400499
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for AutoFlight-PT-04b

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 829871.00 0.00 0.00 FFFFFFTFFFFFFFFF normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400499.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-04b, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400499
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 156K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748624679720

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-04b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 17:04:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 17:04:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 17:04:41] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 82 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:41] [INFO ] Transformed 390 places.
[2025-05-30 17:04:41] [INFO ] Transformed 388 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:04:41] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 17:04:41] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 390 places and 388 transitions and 906 arcs in 174 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 34 out of 390 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 390/390 places, 388/388 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 345 transition count 343
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 345 transition count 343
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 345 transition count 336
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 328 transition count 319
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 328 transition count 319
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 326 transition count 317
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 326 transition count 317
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 324 transition count 315
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 324 transition count 315
Applied a total of 139 rules in 113 ms. Remains 324 /390 variables (removed 66) and now considering 315/388 (removed 73) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 315 rows 324 cols
[2025-05-30 17:04:41] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 316 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:04:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 264 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 621 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 314 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:04:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/324 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 3284 ms of which 769 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 468 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 14/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 20/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 4/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 13/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 324/639 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/324 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 314/314 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/324 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 92/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 315/639 variables, 324/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 314/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 17/775 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 3/778 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 639/639 variables, and 778 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 324/324 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 314/314 constraints, Known Traps: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60116ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 314 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60134ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 324/390 places, 315/388 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60891 ms. Remains : 324/390 places, 315/388 transitions.
Support contains 34 out of 324 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 17:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 315 transitions.
Support contains 33 out of 324 places (down from 34) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (195 resets) in 1626 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 6/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (17 resets) in 178 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (18 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (17 resets) in 149 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (21 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (19 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-05-30 17:05:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 150/159 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 144/303 variables, 19/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 21/324 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 315/639 variables, 324/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 0/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/639 variables, 0/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 639/639 variables, and 352 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 270 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 324/324 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 150/159 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 144/303 variables, 19/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 9/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 21/324 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 3/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 315/639 variables, 324/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 4/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 5/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/639 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 639/639 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 2208 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 324/324 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2484ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 12783 steps, including 67 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=412 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 828 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 89 stabilizing places and 89 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G((p0||F((p1&&G(p2)))))&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 313 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 313 transition count 304
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 307 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 307 transition count 298
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 306 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 306 transition count 297
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 305 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 305 transition count 296
Applied a total of 38 rules in 42 ms. Remains 305 /324 variables (removed 19) and now considering 296/315 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 296 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 183 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 277 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 295 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:05:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 15/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 3/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 9/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 7/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 8/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 305/601 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 84/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 296/601 variables, 305/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/601 variables, 295/716 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/601 variables, 1/717 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 601/601 variables, and 721 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 60048ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60049ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/324 places, 296/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60369 ms. Remains : 305/324 places, 296/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 417 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-01
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 197 steps with 0 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 60864 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 312 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 312 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 312 transition count 302
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 306 transition count 296
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 305 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 305 transition count 295
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 304 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 304 transition count 294
Applied a total of 41 rules in 34 ms. Remains 304 /324 variables (removed 20) and now considering 294/315 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-30 17:06:47] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:06:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 288 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 293 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:06:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 6/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 69 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 11/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 598/598 variables, and 413 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 81/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 293/706 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 3/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 1/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 598/598 variables, and 710 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/324 places, 294/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60368 ms. Remains : 304/324 places, 294/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 8214 steps with 40 reset in 30 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 60580 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 111 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 111 transitions
Performed 111 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 111
Iterating post reduction 0 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 323 transition count 203
Reduce places removed 111 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 212 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 204 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 203 transition count 188
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 203 transition count 146
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 161 transition count 146
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 337 place count 154 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 154 transition count 139
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 154 transition count 136
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 151 transition count 136
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 6 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 54 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 97 transition count 76
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 97 transition count 75
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 461 place count 96 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 95 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 470 place count 89 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 472 place count 87 transition count 71
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 472 place count 87 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 480 place count 83 transition count 67
Applied a total of 480 rules in 69 ms. Remains 83 /324 variables (removed 241) and now considering 67/315 (removed 248) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 83 cols
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [35, 49, 63, 67, 71, 76, 82]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/324 places, 67/315 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 71 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 71 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 70 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 70 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 69 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 69 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 68 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 68 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 67 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 67 transition count 58
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 66 transition count 57
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 66 /76 variables (removed 10) and now considering 57/67 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 66 cols
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 66/324 places, 57/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 269 ms. Remains : 66/324 places, 57/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 37 steps with 1 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 324 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||(p1&&F(G(p1))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 314 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 314 transition count 305
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 314 transition count 304
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 308 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 308 transition count 298
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 307 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 307 transition count 297
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 306 transition count 296
Applied a total of 37 rules in 27 ms. Remains 306 /324 variables (removed 18) and now considering 296/315 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 296 rows 306 cols
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 186 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 299 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 295 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 12/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 11/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 296/602 variables, 306/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 5/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 602/602 variables, and 406 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 72/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 296/602 variables, 306/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 295/702 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 5/707 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 3/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 602/602 variables, and 713 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 306/324 places, 296/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60373 ms. Remains : 306/324 places, 296/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 489 reset in 221 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 490 reset in 295 ms.
Computed a total of 75 stabilizing places and 75 stable transitions
Computed a total of 75 stabilizing places and 75 stable transitions
Detected a total of 75/306 stabilizing places and 75/296 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 135 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 43 ms :[(NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 55 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 140 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 41 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Support contains 1 out of 306 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 306/306 places, 296/296 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 104 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 104 transitions
Performed 104 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 104
Iterating post reduction 0 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 305 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 104 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 113 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 201 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 195 transition count 182
Performed 40 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 40 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 195 transition count 142
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 155 transition count 142
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 8 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 95 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 424 place count 94 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 93 transition count 73
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 93 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 427 place count 92 transition count 72
Applied a total of 427 rules in 28 ms. Remains 92 /306 variables (removed 214) and now considering 72/296 (removed 224) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [39, 53, 67, 73, 79, 85, 91]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 85/306 places, 72/296 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 80 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 80 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 79 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 79 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 78 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 78 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 77 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 77 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 76 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 76 transition count 63
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 75 transition count 62
Applied a total of 20 rules in 9 ms. Remains 75 /85 variables (removed 10) and now considering 62/72 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 75 cols
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned [33, 35]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 73/306 places, 62/296 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 73 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 71 transition count 60
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /73 variables (removed 2) and now considering 60/62 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 71 cols
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:08:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 71/306 places, 60/296 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 372 ms. Remains : 71/306 places, 60/296 transitions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Detected a total of 6/71 stabilizing places and 2/60 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [p1, (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 206 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 6 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (1 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p1, (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 217 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 46 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 48 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4523 reset in 134 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4528 reset in 152 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin7962270849492441772
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 60 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 60 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 60 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Built C files in 16ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin7962270849492441772
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7962270849492441772;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 267 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin7962270849492441772;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 48 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin7962270849492441772;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1036519204128934135.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 103 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 63300 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 111 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 111 transitions
Performed 111 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 111
Iterating post reduction 0 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 323 transition count 203
Reduce places removed 111 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 212 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 204 transition count 190
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 204 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 163 transition count 149
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 332 place count 156 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 156 transition count 142
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 156 transition count 139
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 153 transition count 139
Performed 56 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 7 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 97 transition count 76
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 97 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 96 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 467 place count 90 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 88 transition count 73
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 88 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 84 transition count 69
Applied a total of 477 rules in 36 ms. Remains 84 /324 variables (removed 240) and now considering 69/315 (removed 246) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 84 cols
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [36, 50, 64, 68, 72, 77, 83]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/324 places, 69/315 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 72 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 72 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 71 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 71 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 70 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 70 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 69 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 69 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 68 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 68 transition count 60
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 67 transition count 59
Applied a total of 20 rules in 7 ms. Remains 67 /77 variables (removed 10) and now considering 59/69 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 67 cols
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:08:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 67/324 places, 59/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 218 ms. Remains : 67/324 places, 59/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 15 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 272 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 312 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 312 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 312 transition count 302
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 306 transition count 296
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 305 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 305 transition count 295
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 304 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 304 transition count 294
Applied a total of 41 rules in 26 ms. Remains 304 /324 variables (removed 20) and now considering 294/315 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 174 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 279 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 293 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:08:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 64 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 6/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 11/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 598/598 variables, and 413 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 81/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 293/706 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 3/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 1/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 598/598 variables, and 710 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60046ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60047ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/324 places, 294/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60353 ms. Remains : 304/324 places, 294/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 60511 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X((F(p0)&&X(F(p1)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 314 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 314 transition count 305
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 314 transition count 304
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 310 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 310 transition count 300
Applied a total of 29 rules in 18 ms. Remains 310 /324 variables (removed 14) and now considering 300/315 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 300 rows 310 cols
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 272 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 299 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/310 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 64 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 19/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 20/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 10/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 300/610 variables, 310/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 8/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)timeout

(s103 0.0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 610/610 variables, and 416 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 310/310 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 299/299 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/309 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/310 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 78/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 2/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 3/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 2/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 300/610 variables, 310/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 299/730 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 4/734 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 610/610 variables, and 734 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 310/310 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 299/299 constraints, Known Traps: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 310/324 places, 300/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60354 ms. Remains : 310/324 places, 300/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 273 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 6862 steps with 142 reset in 21 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 60666 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F((p0&&F(!p0))))))'
Support contains 1 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 312 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 312 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 312 transition count 302
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 306 transition count 296
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 305 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 305 transition count 295
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 304 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 304 transition count 294
Applied a total of 41 rules in 26 ms. Remains 304 /324 variables (removed 20) and now considering 294/315 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-30 17:10:53] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:10:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 187 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 310 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 293 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:10:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 6/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 11/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 598/598 variables, and 413 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 81/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 293/706 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 3/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 1/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 598/598 variables, and 710 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60048ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60049ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/324 places, 294/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60386 ms. Remains : 304/324 places, 294/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 171 ms :[p0, true, true, true]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 224 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 60578 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 323 transition count 202
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 211 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 203 transition count 189
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 203 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 162 transition count 148
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 155 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 155 transition count 141
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 155 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 152 transition count 138
Performed 56 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 7 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 56 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 56 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 96 transition count 75
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 460 place count 96 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 461 place count 95 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 89 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 471 place count 87 transition count 72
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 471 place count 87 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 479 place count 83 transition count 68
Applied a total of 479 rules in 26 ms. Remains 83 /324 variables (removed 241) and now considering 68/315 (removed 247) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 83 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [34, 48, 63, 67, 71, 76, 82]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/324 places, 68/315 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 72 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 72 transition count 64
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 71 transition count 63
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /76 variables (removed 5) and now considering 63/68 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 71 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 71/324 places, 63/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 193 ms. Remains : 71/324 places, 63/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5503 reset in 150 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5533 reset in 175 ms.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 69 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 32221 steps (1763 resets) in 174 ms. (184 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 92 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 63/63 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 63/63 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 63/134 variables, 71/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 63/134 variables, 71/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 41/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 828 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1878ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1880ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2005 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 63/63 transitions.
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 4 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 99 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 20074 steps (1116 resets) in 65 ms. (304 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 105 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5499 reset in 133 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5491 reset in 134 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6087868155480565305
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 63 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 63 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 63 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Built C files in 9ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6087868155480565305
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6087868155480565305;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 162 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6087868155480565305;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 34 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6087868155480565305;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9964529454992637829.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 205 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 4386 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(G(p0))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 313 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 313 transition count 304
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 313 transition count 303
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 308 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 308 transition count 298
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 307 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 307 transition count 297
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 306 transition count 296
Applied a total of 37 rules in 28 ms. Remains 306 /324 variables (removed 18) and now considering 296/315 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 296 rows 306 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 198 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 297 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 295 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 12/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 7/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 296/602 variables, 306/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 5/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 602/602 variables, and 401 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 67/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 296/602 variables, 306/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 295/697 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 4/701 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/602 variables, 2/703 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 602/602 variables, and 703 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 306/324 places, 296/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60369 ms. Remains : 306/324 places, 296/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 4 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-13 finished in 60554 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((X(G(p1))||p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 313 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 313 transition count 304
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 313 transition count 303
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 307 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 307 transition count 297
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 306 transition count 296
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 305 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 305 transition count 295
Applied a total of 39 rules in 20 ms. Remains 305 /324 variables (removed 19) and now considering 295/315 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-30 17:12:58] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:12:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 312 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 294 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 7/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 11/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 6/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 12/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 305/600 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 96/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 294/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 2/728 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 600/600 variables, and 737 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/324 places, 295/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60377 ms. Remains : 305/324 places, 295/315 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 488 reset in 164 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 490 reset in 170 ms.
Computed a total of 74 stabilizing places and 74 stable transitions
Computed a total of 74 stabilizing places and 74 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X p0), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 103 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 88 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (194 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (19 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:13:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 51/53 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 230/283 variables, 23/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 22/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/600 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 600/600 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 137 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 51/53 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 230/283 variables, 23/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 22/305 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 1/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 1/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/600 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 600/600 variables, and 341 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 761 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 903ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 176 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=88 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 1 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X p0), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 148 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 100 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 4 out of 305 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 295/295 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 305 /305 variables (removed 0) and now considering 295/295 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:14:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:14:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 275 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 294 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:14:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 7/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 11/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 6/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 12/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 600/600 variables, and 429 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 96/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 294/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 2/728 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 9/737 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 600/600 variables, and 737 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60337 ms. Remains : 305/305 places, 295/295 transitions.
Computed a total of 74 stabilizing places and 74 stable transitions
Computed a total of 74 stabilizing places and 74 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X p0), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 82 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (194 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (20 resets) in 22 ms. (1739 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:15:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 51/53 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 230/283 variables, 23/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 22/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/600 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 600/600 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 152 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 51/53 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 230/283 variables, 23/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/283 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 22/305 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 4/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 1/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 1/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/600 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 600/600 variables, and 341 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 856 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1034ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 176 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=88 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 1 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X p0), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 115 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 490 reset in 154 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 489 reset in 166 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 4 out of 305 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 295/295 transitions.
Performed 94 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 305 transition count 295
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 305 transition count 291
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 305 transition count 291
Deduced a syphon composed of 139 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 305 transition count 291
Discarding 79 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 79 rule applications. Total rules 222 place count 226 transition count 212
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 226 transition count 212
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 7 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 128 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 369 place count 226 transition count 205
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 414 place count 181 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 83 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 181 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 83 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 459 rules in 31 ms. Remains 181 /305 variables (removed 124) and now considering 160/295 (removed 135) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 181 cols
[2025-05-30 17:15:03] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 26/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 53 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD132 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 160/341 variables, 181/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 29/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved in 8107 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 81/178 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 30/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/181 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 160/341 variables, 181/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 29/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 76/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/159 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38176ms problems are : Problem set: 83 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 83 dead transitions in 38176ms
Found 83 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 83 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 83 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 181/305 places, 77/295 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 245 edges and 181 vertex of which 98 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 83 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 83 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 98 /181 variables (removed 83) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 98/305 places, 77/295 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 38244 ms. Remains : 98/305 places, 77/295 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin9530305772320274395
[2025-05-30 17:15:41] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin9530305772320274395
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9530305772320274395;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 423 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9530305772320274395;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 31 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin9530305772320274395;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased17977044962603534912.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 4 out of 305 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 295/295 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 305 /305 variables (removed 0) and now considering 295/295 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-30 17:15:57] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:15:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:15:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 187 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 311 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 294 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:15:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 66 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 7/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 11/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 6/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 12/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 600/600 variables, and 429 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 96/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 294/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 2/728 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 600/600 variables, and 737 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60049ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60378 ms. Remains : 305/305 places, 295/295 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin5087496338101434989
[2025-05-30 17:16:57] [INFO ] Built C files in 11ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin5087496338101434989
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5087496338101434989;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 430 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5087496338101434989;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 52 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin5087496338101434989;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1069269955978258239.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 17:17:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL5514044438862083768.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL4495026746908399984.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL5514044438862083768.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut11296915458389093080.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL4495026746908399984.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL4495026746908399984.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut11296915458389093080.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL5118297701852505248.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL7299062668055251452.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL5118297701852505248.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL7299062668055251452.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...275
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(("((p251==0)||(p145==1))")||(X(G("((p254==0)||(p19==1))"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : F(!"((p251==0)||(p145==1))" & XF!"((p254==0)||(p19==1))")
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:17:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15522018129083426164.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15522018129083426164.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15522018129083426164.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15522018129083426164.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15522018129083426164.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:17:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:17:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:17:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 61 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:17:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:17:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL569393468248029903.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2734177405231991678.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL569393468248029903.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL2734177405231991678.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...253
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(("((i22.i0.u70.p251==0)||(i10.u39.p145==1))")||(X(G("((i16.i0.u71.p254==0)||(i1.i1.u7.p19==1))"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : F(!"((i22.i0.u70.p251==0)||(i10.u39.p145==1))" & XF!"((i16.i0.u71.p254==0)||(i1.i1.u7.p19==1))")
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t112, t115, t139, t142, t161, t168, t185, t192, t212, t219, t235, t303, t304, t306, t307, t30...759
Computing Next relation with stutter on 320 deadlock states
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 299413 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((X(G(p1))||p0)))'
Found a Lengthening insensitive property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-14
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 4 out of 324 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 324/324 places, 315/315 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 323 transition count 202
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 211 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 203 transition count 189
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 203 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 162 transition count 148
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 155 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 155 transition count 141
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 155 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 152 transition count 138
Performed 52 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 7 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 451 place count 100 transition count 79
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 100 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 99 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 461 place count 93 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 463 place count 91 transition count 76
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 463 place count 91 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 471 place count 87 transition count 72
Applied a total of 471 rules in 30 ms. Remains 87 /324 variables (removed 237) and now considering 72/315 (removed 243) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 87 cols
[2025-05-30 17:17:58] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [71, 75, 80, 86]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 70 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/324 places, 72/315 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 81 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 81 transition count 70
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 78 transition count 67
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 78 /83 variables (removed 5) and now considering 67/72 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 78 cols
[2025-05-30 17:17:58] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:17:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:17:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 78/324 places, 67/315 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 245 ms. Remains : 78/324 places, 67/315 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5112 reset in 159 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5107 reset in 135 ms.
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 210 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 94 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2046 resets) in 72 ms. (547 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (305 resets) in 27 ms. (1428 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:17:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:17:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 49/51 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/55 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/110 variables, 55/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 8/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 34/144 variables, 22/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 8/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 75 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 49/51 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/55 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/110 variables, 55/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 8/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 34/144 variables, 22/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 8/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 92 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 171ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 27 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 237 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 87 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 100 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 4 out of 78 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 67/67 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 67/67 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:17:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:17:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:17:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:18:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:18:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/78 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 67/145 variables, 78/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 8/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 107 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1909 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/78 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 2/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 67/145 variables, 78/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 8/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 52/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 5156 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 7076ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7079ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7213 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 67/67 transitions.
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 6 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 209 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 94 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2045 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (310 resets) in 21 ms. (1818 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-30 17:18:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:18:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 49/51 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/55 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/110 variables, 55/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 8/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 34/144 variables, 22/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 8/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 66 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 49/51 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/55 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/110 variables, 55/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 8/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 34/144 variables, 22/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 8/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 98 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 168ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 27 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=27 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p1), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 217 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5110 reset in 199 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5112 reset in 259 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 4 out of 78 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 67/67 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 67/67 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:18:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 17:18:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/78 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 67/145 variables, 78/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 8/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 107 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1996 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/78 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 2/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 67/145 variables, 78/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 8/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 52/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 5114 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 7118ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7118ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7130 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 67/67 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13242916305195095028
[2025-05-30 17:18:15] [INFO ] Built C files in 1ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13242916305195095028
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13242916305195095028;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 147 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13242916305195095028;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 33 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13242916305195095028;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased7440099469669115665.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 13401 ms.
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 31341 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES LENGTHENING_INSENSITIVE
[2025-05-30 17:18:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
All properties solved without resorting to exhaustive model-checking.
Total runtime 828610 ms.

BK_STOP 1748625509591

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-04b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-04b, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400499"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-04b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-04b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;