Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400497.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-04b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400497
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 156K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748624204734

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-04b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 16:56:45] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 16:56:45] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 75 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Transformed 390 places.
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Transformed 388 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 390 places and 388 transitions and 906 arcs in 164 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 78 out of 390 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 390/390 places, 388/388 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 348 transition count 346
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 348 transition count 346
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 348 transition count 339
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 337 transition count 328
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 337 transition count 328
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 334 transition count 325
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 334 transition count 325
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 333 transition count 324
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 333 transition count 324
Applied a total of 121 rules in 100 ms. Remains 333 /390 variables (removed 57) and now considering 324/388 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 324 rows 333 cols
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 20 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 290 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 252 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 572 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 323 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:56:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/333 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 60 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 63 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 14/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 2/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 1.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/657 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/333 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 323/323 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/333 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 86/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 77 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 3/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 3/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 3/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 12/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 324/657 variables, 333/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 323/804 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 657/657 variables, and 814 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 333/333 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 323/323 constraints, Known Traps: 130/130 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60094ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 323 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60105ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 333/390 places, 324/388 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60796 ms. Remains : 333/390 places, 324/388 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 333 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:47] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-05-30 16:57:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 16:57:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 324 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 333 places (down from 78) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (195 resets) in 1391 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 6/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (16 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (18 resets) in 125 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (17 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (16 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (24 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (18 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-05-30 16:57:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 161/174 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 138/312 variables, 18/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 21/333 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 324/657 variables, 333/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 0/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/657 variables, 0/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 657/657 variables, and 361 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 312 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 333/333 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 161/174 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/312 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 21/333 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 324/657 variables, 333/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 5/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 2/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 2/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 2/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/657 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 657/657 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 2230 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 333/333 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 2547ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 1064 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 333 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 104 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 104 transitions
Performed 104 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 104
Iterating post reduction 0 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 333 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 104 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 115 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 229 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 223 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 221 transition count 207
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 221 transition count 165
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 179 transition count 165
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 327 place count 165 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 165 transition count 151
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 165 transition count 145
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 159 transition count 145
Performed 52 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 7 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 107 transition count 86
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 106 transition count 86
Free-agglomeration rule applied 15 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 474 place count 106 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 489 place count 91 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 490 place count 90 transition count 70
Applied a total of 490 rules in 45 ms. Remains 90 /333 variables (removed 243) and now considering 70/324 (removed 254) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 90/333 places, 70/324 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (561 resets) in 535 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (162 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 90 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:51] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/30 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 20/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/87 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/90 variables, 3/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 70/160 variables, 90/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 36/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 79 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/30 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 20/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/87 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/90 variables, 3/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 70/160 variables, 90/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 36/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 97 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 182ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 15 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=15 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:57:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 324 transitions.
Computed a total of 89 stabilizing places and 89 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 332 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 220 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 212 transition count 197
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 212 transition count 155
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 170 transition count 155
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 344 place count 156 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 156 transition count 141
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 156 transition count 134
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 149 transition count 134
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 103 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 471 place count 103 transition count 81
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 485 place count 96 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 95 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 492 place count 90 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 493 place count 89 transition count 72
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 493 place count 89 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 501 place count 85 transition count 68
Applied a total of 501 rules in 37 ms. Remains 85 /333 variables (removed 248) and now considering 68/324 (removed 256) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 85 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [79, 84]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/333 places, 68/324 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 77 transition count 62
Applied a total of 12 rules in 5 ms. Remains 77 /83 variables (removed 6) and now considering 62/68 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 77 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 77/333 places, 62/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 234 ms. Remains : 77/333 places, 62/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12439935241377852634.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13559358534498920465.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12439935241377852634.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13559358534498920465.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74387e+06,0.025201,4416,2,636,5,2929,6,0,363,2876,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((p249==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((p249==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t46, t58, t59, t60, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse...183
(forward)formula 0,1,1.01382,47716,1,0,352,272871,150,173,2117,234200,441
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 109 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 109 transitions
Performed 109 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 109
Iterating post reduction 0 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 332 transition count 214
Reduce places removed 109 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 123 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 223 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 215 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 214 transition count 199
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 214 transition count 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 172 transition count 157
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 339 place count 159 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 4 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 159 transition count 144
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 159 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 153 transition count 138
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 104 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 104 transition count 82
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 483 place count 97 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 96 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 490 place count 91 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 491 place count 90 transition count 73
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 491 place count 90 transition count 69
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 499 place count 86 transition count 69
Applied a total of 499 rules in 35 ms. Remains 86 /333 variables (removed 247) and now considering 69/324 (removed 255) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 86 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [35, 51, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/333 places, 69/324 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 74 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 74 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 73 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 73 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 72 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 72 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 71 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 70 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 70 transition count 60
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 69 transition count 59
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 69 /79 variables (removed 10) and now considering 59/69 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 69 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 69/333 places, 59/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 206 ms. Remains : 69/333 places, 59/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17698794725629515558.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17095672321884974347.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17698794725629515558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17095672321884974347.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.36371e+06,0.014675,4308,2,359,5,2045,6,0,329,2371,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((p85==0)||(p261==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p85==0)||(p261==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t9, t55, t56, t57, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
(forward)formula 0,1,0.149491,11092,1,0,130,38755,140,59,1892,37048,136
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 97 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 97 transitions
Performed 97 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 97
Iterating post reduction 0 with 97 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 332 transition count 226
Reduce places removed 97 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 235 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 229 transition count 212
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 226 transition count 212
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 226 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 301 place count 184 transition count 170
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 311 place count 174 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 174 transition count 160
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 174 transition count 155
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 169 transition count 155
Performed 50 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 431 place count 119 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 119 transition count 98
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 112 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 111 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 107 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 106 transition count 89
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 106 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 465 place count 103 transition count 86
Applied a total of 465 rules in 25 ms. Remains 103 /333 variables (removed 230) and now considering 86/324 (removed 238) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 103 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [64, 78, 84, 102]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/333 places, 86/324 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 97 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 97 transition count 84
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 93 transition count 80
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 93 /99 variables (removed 6) and now considering 80/86 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 17 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/333 places, 80/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 228 ms. Remains : 93/333 places, 80/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13146812426659058205.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3170666360072548485.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13146812426659058205.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3170666360072548485.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87934e+08,0.04387,5848,2,1622,5,8813,6,0,445,8589,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(AG((((p273==0)||(p378==1))||(p164==0)))) * ((((p363==1) + AG(((p52==0)||(p197==1)))) + ((p278==0)||(p167==1))) + ((((p282==0)&&(p9...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((p273==0)||(p378==1))||(p164==0))))))))) * (p363==1))] != FALSE + ...572
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t3, t6, t8, t10, t22, t66, t71, t74, t75, t76, t78, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,3.5943,140052,1,0,336,804043,191,184,2806,793771,378
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 312 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 312 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 312 transition count 302
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 306 transition count 296
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 304 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 304 transition count 294
Applied a total of 59 rules in 22 ms. Remains 304 /333 variables (removed 29) and now considering 294/324 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:57] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:57:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 293 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 6/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 72 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 11/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 598/598 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 82/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 293/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 2/712 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 598/598 variables, and 719 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/333 places, 294/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60341 ms. Remains : 304/333 places, 294/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:58:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 294 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:58:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7067021635000520141.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11443492683218724363.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7067021635000520141.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11443492683218724363.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.14719e+22,16.4845,463176,2,129777,5,1.54453e+06,6,0,1512,2.92427e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2488636219316723049.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2488636219316723049.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2488636219316723049.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2488636219316723049.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2488636219316723049.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 59 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3796201497878757423.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality885659245354400863.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3796201497878757423.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality885659245354400863.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.14719e+22,0.267113,15124,3083,14,23736,225,587,26931,28,467,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(!(E(((i18.u96.p304!=1)||(i13.i0.u66.p235!=1)) U !(EF((i5.i1.u23.p76==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(((i18.u96.p304!=1)||(i13.i0.u66.p235!=1)) U !(E(TRUE U (i5.i1.u23.p76==1)))))))))] != FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t91, t94, t104, t107, t120, t151, t158, t173, t180, t202, t217, t283, t285, t286, t287, i0.u4...744
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
(forward)formula 0,1,9.85955,322836,1,0,857982,225,3887,782073,135,467,1477249
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 107 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 107 transitions
Performed 107 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 107
Iterating post reduction 0 with 107 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 332 transition count 216
Reduce places removed 107 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 225 transition count 202
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 217 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 216 transition count 201
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 216 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 175 transition count 160
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 161 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 161 transition count 146
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 161 transition count 139
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 362 place count 154 transition count 139
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 454 place count 108 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 461 place count 108 transition count 86
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 475 place count 101 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 476 place count 100 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 482 place count 95 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 483 place count 94 transition count 77
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 483 place count 94 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 491 place count 90 transition count 73
Applied a total of 491 rules in 29 ms. Remains 90 /333 variables (removed 243) and now considering 73/324 (removed 251) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 90 cols
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned [74, 79, 84, 89]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/333 places, 73/324 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 84 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 84 transition count 71
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 80 transition count 67
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 80 /86 variables (removed 6) and now considering 67/73 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 80 cols
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/333 places, 67/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 216 ms. Remains : 80/333 places, 67/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17913054855148437172.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1328371185580906418.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17913054855148437172.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1328371185580906418.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.3639e+07,0.022102,4612,2,639,5,3439,6,0,380,3351,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EF(((p266==1)||(p104==1))) * ((p251==0)||(p159==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U ((p266==1)||(p104==1))) * ((p251==0)||(p159==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t63, t64, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/int...179
(forward)formula 0,1,0.213891,14340,1,0,137,55736,162,67,2261,44759,147
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 313 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 313 transition count 304
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 313 transition count 303
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 307 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 307 transition count 297
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 305 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 305 transition count 295
Applied a total of 57 rules in 16 ms. Remains 305 /333 variables (removed 28) and now considering 295/324 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 305 cols
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 294 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 12/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 9/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 8/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 600/600 variables, and 409 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 76/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 295/600 variables, 305/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 294/703 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 6/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 3/712 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 600/600 variables, and 712 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60048ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/333 places, 295/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60341 ms. Remains : 305/333 places, 295/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10755502842032157117.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13567566791167936519.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10755502842032157117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13567566791167936519.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8539937808188406932.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8539937808188406932.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8539937808188406932.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8539937808188406932.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8539937808188406932.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 61 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12883575473929718233.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1443264689957408373.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12883575473929718233.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1443264689957408373.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.28497e+22,0.276699,15788,3451,14,24039,197,609,30193,28,415,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(((i11.i1.u111.p340==0)||(i5.i1.u39.p133==1)) U ((i18.i2.u92.p295!=0)&&(i12.i1.u70.p242==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(((i11.i1.u111.p340==0)||(i5.i1.u39.p133==1)) U ((i18.i2.u92.p295!=0)&&(i12.i1.u70.p242==1)))))]...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t91, t94, t117, t120, t130, t133, t151, t158, t174, t181, t203, t218, t284, t286, t287, t288,...738
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 317 transition count 308
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 317 transition count 308
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 317 transition count 307
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 313 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 313 transition count 303
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 311 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 311 transition count 301
Applied a total of 45 rules in 12 ms. Remains 311 /333 variables (removed 22) and now considering 301/324 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 311 cols
[2025-05-30 17:01:39] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:01:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 273 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:01:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 14/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 15/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 5/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 14/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 301/612 variables, 311/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 612/612 variables, and 430 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 311/311 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/311 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 91/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 5/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 3/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 301/612 variables, 311/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/612 variables, 300/742 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/612 variables, 7/749 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 612/612 variables, and 750 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 311/311 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 311/333 places, 301/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60341 ms. Remains : 311/333 places, 301/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 301 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality63484865501442215.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9287151433323252790.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality63484865501442215.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9287151433323252790.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15219321903345509789.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15219321903345509789.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15219321903345509789.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15219321903345509789.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15219321903345509789.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 55 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7512389424842062069.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10575518806139649883.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7512389424842062069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10575518806139649883.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.64076e+22,1.06165,46752,8693,26,85424,320,615,134466,41,943,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((((i7.u33.p115==0) + (EX(((i14.i0.u65.p232==0)||(i9.i1.u43.p150==1))) * (AG(((i10.u45.p161==0)||(i19.i2.u87.p286==1))) + (i2.u13.p3...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((i7.u33.p115==0) + (EX(((i14.i0.u65.p232==0)||(i9.i1.u43.p150==1))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((...317
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t110, t113, t126, t136, t139, t165, t180, t209, t224, t289, t290, t292, t293, t294, i0.t202, ...872
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 105 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 105 transitions
Performed 105 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 105
Iterating post reduction 0 with 105 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 332 transition count 218
Reduce places removed 105 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 1 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 227 transition count 204
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 219 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 216 transition count 201
Performed 43 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 43 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 216 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 173 transition count 158
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 338 place count 159 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 159 transition count 144
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 159 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 153 transition count 138
Performed 44 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 109 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 109 transition count 87
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 473 place count 102 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 474 place count 101 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 480 place count 96 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 481 place count 95 transition count 78
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 481 place count 95 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 489 place count 91 transition count 74
Applied a total of 489 rules in 20 ms. Remains 91 /333 variables (removed 242) and now considering 74/324 (removed 250) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 91 cols
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [80, 85, 90]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/333 places, 74/324 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 87 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 87 transition count 73
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 82 transition count 68
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 82 /88 variables (removed 6) and now considering 68/74 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 82 cols
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 82/333 places, 68/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 187 ms. Remains : 82/333 places, 68/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4885403692159938492.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2664355577512468598.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4885403692159938492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2664355577512468598.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.09019e+07,0.022275,4628,2,696,5,3427,6,0,389,2994,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(!(E(((!((p41==1)&&((p335==0)||(p300==1))))||(p259!=1)) U ((p318==0)||(p306==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(((!((p41==1)&&((p335==0)||(p300==1))))||(p259!=1)) U ((p318==0)||(p306==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t13, t64, t65, t66, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/revers...184
(forward)formula 0,0,0.42927,24220,1,0,234,102412,162,179,2239,135592,265
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 312 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 312 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 312 transition count 302
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 306 transition count 296
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 304 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 304 transition count 294
Applied a total of 59 rules in 17 ms. Remains 304 /333 variables (removed 29) and now considering 294/324 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 254 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 293 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:03:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 55 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 6/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 66 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 11/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 598/598 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 82/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 293/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 2/712 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 25 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 598/598 variables, and 719 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60043ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/333 places, 294/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60315 ms. Remains : 304/333 places, 294/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:04:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 294 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:04:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4252075755913419394.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13317932565726148022.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4252075755913419394.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13317932565726148022.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.14719e+22,16.7527,464560,2,129777,5,1.54453e+06,6,0,1512,2.92427e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9582975758200558644.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9582975758200558644.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9582975758200558644.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9582975758200558644.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9582975758200558644.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 60 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4019422441058649048.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14494622827561649107.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4019422441058649048.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14494622827561649107.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.14719e+22,0.30045,16416,2614,13,26620,212,589,30797,28,372,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(AG((EF(((i8.i1.u92.p298==0)||(i11.u46.p165==1))) * EF((i6.u16.p48==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U ((i8.i1.u92.p298==0)||(i11.u46.p165==1))) * E(TRUE U (i6.u16.p48==1))...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t91, t94, t117, t120, t151, t158, t180, t195, t202, t217, t283, t285, t286, t287, i0.t107, i0...747
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 314 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 314 transition count 305
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 314 transition count 304
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 309 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 309 transition count 299
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 308 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 308 transition count 298
Applied a total of 51 rules in 22 ms. Remains 308 /333 variables (removed 25) and now considering 298/324 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 298 rows 308 cols
[2025-05-30 17:05:41] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:05:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 262 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 297 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:05:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 298/606 variables, 308/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/606 variables, 6/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 74 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/606 variables, 16/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/606 variables, 1/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 606/606 variables, and 388 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 308/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 297/297 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 52/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 9/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 2/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 298/606 variables, 308/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/606 variables, 297/696 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/606 variables, 6/702 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/606 variables, 3/705 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 606/606 variables, and 705 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 308/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 297/297 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 308/333 places, 298/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60329 ms. Remains : 308/333 places, 298/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:06:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 298 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:06:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18412657902663947293.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:06:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15770816817322369780.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18412657902663947293.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15770816817322369780.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph64849474974556964.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph64849474974556964.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph64849474974556964.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph64849474974556964.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph64849474974556964.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 57 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9345134922549685964.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality253820613285473981.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9345134922549685964.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality253820613285473981.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.48594e+22,0.281538,15660,3435,20,24638,207,588,29156,35,436,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((AX(EG(((i5.u18.p49==0)&&(i1.i0.u50.p182==1)))) * (i13.i1.u64.p227==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((!(EX(!(EG(((i5.u18.p49==0)&&(i1.i0.u50.p182==1)))))) * (i13.i1.u64.p227==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t106, t109, t132, t160, t175, t182, t197, t204, t221, t287, t289, t290, t291, i0.t96, i0.t93,...796
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 315 transition count 306
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 315 transition count 306
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 315 transition count 305
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 310 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 310 transition count 300
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 308 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 308 transition count 298
Applied a total of 51 rules in 23 ms. Remains 308 /333 variables (removed 25) and now considering 298/324 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 298 rows 308 cols
[2025-05-30 17:07:41] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:07:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 162 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 256 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 297 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:07:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 66 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 66 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 12/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 3/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 298/606 variables, 308/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/606 variables, 6/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 606/606 variables, and 400 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 308/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 297/297 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 64/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 5/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 298/606 variables, 308/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/606 variables, 297/705 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/606 variables, 11/716 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 606/606 variables, and 717 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 308/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 297/297 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 308/333 places, 298/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60328 ms. Remains : 308/333 places, 298/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:08:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 298 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:08:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1480994362902069135.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:08:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11451180010920777737.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1480994362902069135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11451180010920777737.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.04808e+22,26.5984,702796,2,194963,5,2.35324e+06,6,0,1532,4.3797e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11864183439782278868.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11864183439782278868.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11864183439782278868.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11864183439782278868.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11864183439782278868.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 54 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3799360864136120336.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3840309231559230132.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3799360864136120336.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3840309231559230132.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.04808e+22,0.365192,19632,3080,21,33503,277,614,41097,40,602,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AX(FALSE) + AG(EX(((i20.i0.u116.p353==0)||(i16.i2.u72.p252==1))))) * ((EG(AF((i2.u9.p32!=0))) + AG((i6.i0.u28.p86==1))) + AG((i13.i0...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((EY(Init) * (!(EX(!(FALSE))) + !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((i20.i0.u116.p353==0)||(i16.i2.u72.p252==1)))))))),!(EG(...491
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t107, t133, t136, t161, t176, t183, t198, t205, t220, t287, t289, t290, i0.t123, i0.t120, i0....820
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 314 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 314 transition count 305
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 308 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 308 transition count 299
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 306 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 306 transition count 297
Applied a total of 54 rules in 19 ms. Remains 306 /333 variables (removed 27) and now considering 297/324 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 297 rows 306 cols
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 166 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 262 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 296 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 17/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 20/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 297/603 variables, 306/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 2/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 603/603 variables, and 400 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 296/296 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/306 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 66/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/306 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 297/603 variables, 306/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 296/698 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 6/704 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 2/706 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 603/603 variables, and 706 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 306/306 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 296/296 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 306/333 places, 297/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60324 ms. Remains : 306/333 places, 297/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 297 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1311355895640387344.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:10:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14101655272664943305.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1311355895640387344.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14101655272664943305.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.05115e+22,16.6964,470624,2,133199,5,1.56297e+06,6,0,1523,2.96634e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1755379727826516267.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1755379727826516267.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1755379727826516267.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1755379727826516267.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1755379727826516267.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 57 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8737509321052977486.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5560736138033629595.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8737509321052977486.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5560736138033629595.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.05115e+22,0.311545,16680,2566,23,26374,271,627,33437,43,594,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((AX((AF((i5.u19.p63==1)) + (i3.i1.u8.p19!=1))) * !(AF(((i15.u92.p301==0)||(i17.i0.u103.p329==1))))) U E((i11.i2.u56.p208==1) U (EF((...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(FwdU(EY(Init),(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((i5.u19.p63==1)))) + (i3.i1.u8.p19!=1))))) * !(!(EG(!(((i15.u92.p301==...317
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t105, t108, t131, t134, t159, t174, t181, t203, t220, t286, t288, t289, t290, i0.u10.t0, i0.u...781
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 108 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 108 transitions
Performed 108 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 108
Iterating post reduction 0 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 332 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 108 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 224 transition count 204
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 218 transition count 204
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 218 transition count 162
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 176 transition count 162
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 332 place count 161 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 161 transition count 147
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 161 transition count 139
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 153 transition count 139
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 106 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 464 place count 106 transition count 85
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 478 place count 99 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 479 place count 98 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 94 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 485 place count 93 transition count 76
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 485 place count 93 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 491 place count 90 transition count 73
Applied a total of 491 rules in 25 ms. Remains 90 /333 variables (removed 243) and now considering 73/324 (removed 251) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 90 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [39, 53, 68, 74, 79, 84, 89]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/333 places, 73/324 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 78 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 78 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 77 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 77 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 76 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 76 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 75 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 75 transition count 65
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 74 transition count 64
Applied a total of 18 rules in 5 ms. Remains 74 /83 variables (removed 9) and now considering 64/73 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 74 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 74/333 places, 64/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 181 ms. Remains : 74/333 places, 64/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6448200153547280756.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4105514160414580126.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6448200153547280756.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4105514160414580126.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.25608e+07,0.02011,4404,2,330,5,2345,6,0,357,2636,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(((p299==0)||(p220==1))) U (p192==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((p192==1))))) * !(E(!((p192==1)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p299==0)||(p220==1)))))) * !((p192==1)))))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t60, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect...173
(forward)formula 0,0,0.961253,46100,1,0,452,246163,158,225,2107,285360,537
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 333/333 places, 324/324 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 312 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 312 transition count 303
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 312 transition count 302
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 306 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 306 transition count 296
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 304 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 304 transition count 294
Applied a total of 59 rules in 20 ms. Remains 304 /333 variables (removed 29) and now considering 294/324 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 304 cols
[2025-05-30 17:11:43] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 259 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 293 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:11:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 20/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 65 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 6/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 11/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 598/598 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/304 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 82/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 294/598 variables, 304/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 293/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/598 variables, 2/712 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 598/598 variables, and 719 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 304/304 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60052ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 304/333 places, 294/324 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60332 ms. Remains : 304/333 places, 294/324 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 294 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1965028465146550537.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:12:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12272638523225896897.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1965028465146550537.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12272638523225896897.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.14719e+22,16.2029,463796,2,129777,5,1.54453e+06,6,0,1512,2.92427e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16181007827071858062.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16181007827071858062.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16181007827071858062.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16181007827071858062.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16181007827071858062.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 58 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12375898627697257069.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11712712300290847207.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12375898627697257069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11712712300290847207.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.14719e+22,0.210225,12564,1796,14,17346,210,568,22477,29,444,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(EX(E(EF((i0.i1.u66.p234==1)) U !(((i9.i1.u34.p120==0)||(i15.u79.p268==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(EX(E(E(TRUE U (i0.i1.u66.p234==1)) U !(((i9.i1.u34.p120==0)||(i15.u79.p268==1)))))))))] != F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t94, t117, t120, t130, t133, t151, t158, t180, t202, t217, t283, t284, t285, t286, t287, i0.t...755
(forward)formula 0,1,3.26262,169236,1,0,400388,210,3568,573595,127,444,828837
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11237047468390831371.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11237047468390831371.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11237047468390831371.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11237047468390831371.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11237047468390831371.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 49 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9920490989945327222.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2627029942146696442.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9920490989945327222.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2627029942146696442.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.38627e+23,7.07128,232304,18662,29,432461,448,656,769325,50,1291,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(((i1.i1.u120.p340==0)||(i10.i1.u41.p133==1)) U ((i16.i1.u100.p295!=0)&&(i0.i2.u79.p242==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(((i1.i1.u120.p340==0)||(i10.i1.u41.p133==1)) U ((i16.i1.u100.p295!=0)&&(i0.i2.u79.p242==1)))))]...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t108, t133, t178, t220, t227, t246, t312, t313, t315, t316, i0.t105, i0.i2.t107, i1.i0.u60.t2...1068
(forward)formula 0,1,344.019,12027440,1,0,2.33577e+07,448,4107,4.07165e+07,227,1291,18419705
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EX((((i9.i1.u35.p115==0) + (EX(((i0.i1.u75.p232==0)||(i11.u48.p150==1))) * (AG(((i12.u54.p161==0)||(i17.i2.u96.p286==1))) + (i4.u15.p3...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((i9.i1.u35.p115==0) + (EX(((i0.i1.u75.p232==0)||(i11.u48.p150==1))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((...317
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:38:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:38:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:38:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:38:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:38:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:38:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7901127521192093091.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:38:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10702347605600323462.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7901127521192093091.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10702347605600323462.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.38627e+23,639.3,14153552,120426,1005,1.71871e+07,2219,898,1.45051e+08,321,14187,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-04b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-04b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400497"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-04b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-04b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;