Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400490.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400490
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 432K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748624068989

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-04a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 55 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Transformed 107 places.
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Transformed 105 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 107 places and 105 transitions and 340 arcs in 156 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 20 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 20 transitions.
Support contains 82 out of 107 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 107 /107 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 107 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 269 ms returned [37, 62, 80]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 304 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 104 /104 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 339 ms. Remains : 104/107 places, 85/85 transitions.
Support contains 82 out of 104 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
Support contains 80 out of 104 places (down from 82) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 65 to 60
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1340 resets) in 1682 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 7/60 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (225 resets) in 120 ms. (330 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (316 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (250 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (247 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (195 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (254 resets) in 80 ms. (493 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 104 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:31] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 59/77 variables, 11/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 59/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/104 variables, 14/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 27/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 85/189 variables, 104/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 19/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 189/189 variables, and 252 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 230 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 104/104 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 64/67 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 64/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 37/104 variables, 21/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 37/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 85/189 variables, 104/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 19/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 189/189 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 155 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 104/104 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 413ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 20 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=20 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 4 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
Support contains 59 out of 104 places (down from 73) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 102 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 101 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 101 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 100 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 100 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 99 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 99 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 98 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 97 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 97 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 96 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 95 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 95 transition count 76
Applied a total of 18 rules in 32 ms. Remains 95 /104 variables (removed 9) and now considering 76/85 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [7, 14, 28, 31, 34, 39, 74, 80, 86, 92, 94]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/104 places, 76/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 79 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 79 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 78 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 78 transition count 70
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 78 /84 variables (removed 6) and now considering 70/76 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 78 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 78/104 places, 70/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 226 ms. Remains : 78/104 places, 70/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16505824980426880386.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5718605425896638010.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16505824980426880386.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5718605425896638010.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.93466e+06,0.076098,7092,2,900,5,12777,6,0,382,18896,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(!(A(EF(((p35==1)&&(p96==1))) U AX((p53==1))))) * E(AG((p36==1)) U !(((p13!=1) + EF(((p21==1)&&(p74==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(!((E(!(!(EX(!((p53==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((p35==1)&&(p96==1)))) * !(!(EX(!((p53==1)...284
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,4.12505,151212,1,0,497,981053,183,314,2397,721667,564
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 102 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 83
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 102 /104 variables (removed 2) and now considering 83/85 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 102 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [7, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 81, 87, 93, 99, 101]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/104 places, 83/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 87 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 87 transition count 79
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 87 /91 variables (removed 4) and now considering 79/83 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 87 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 87/104 places, 79/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 230 ms. Remains : 87/104 places, 79/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9535175094379051997.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12805773744678663830.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9535175094379051997.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12805773744678663830.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.97152e+06,0.061051,6724,2,779,5,11487,6,0,427,16206,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((AG((((p14==0)||(p43==0))||(p3==0))) + !(E(((p68==1)&&(p6==1)) U EX((p52==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U !((((p14==0)||(p43==0))||(p3==0))))) + !(E(((p68==1)&&(p6==1)) U EX((p52==1)...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t30, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,0.855793,33788,1,0,196,187579,191,109,2550,132429,243
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 102 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 101 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 101 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 100 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 100 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 99 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 99 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 98 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 97 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 97 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 96 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 95 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 95 transition count 76
Applied a total of 18 rules in 16 ms. Remains 95 /104 variables (removed 9) and now considering 76/85 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 74, 80, 86, 92, 94]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/104 places, 76/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 78 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 77 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 77 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 76 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 76 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 75 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 75 transition count 68
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 75 /83 variables (removed 8) and now considering 68/76 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/104 places, 68/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 221 ms. Remains : 75/104 places, 68/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14901775242519041369.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17912624861170441514.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14901775242519041369.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17912624861170441514.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92646e+06,0.067497,7120,2,769,5,12902,6,0,370,18996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EF((p39==0)) * AF(((p24==0) * AX((p23==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U (p39==0)) * !(EG(!(((p24==0) * !(EX(!((p23==1)))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t33, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,3.79933,141116,1,0,424,847081,172,277,2307,759038,410
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 102 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 101 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 101 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 100 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 100 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 99 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 99 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 98 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 97 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 97 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 96 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 95 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 95 transition count 76
Applied a total of 18 rules in 20 ms. Remains 95 /104 variables (removed 9) and now considering 76/85 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:41] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 74, 80, 86, 92, 94]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/104 places, 76/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 78 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 77 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 77 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 76 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 76 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 75 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 75 transition count 68
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 75 /83 variables (removed 8) and now considering 68/76 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/104 places, 68/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 181 ms. Remains : 75/104 places, 68/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17995839044741255124.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17485695260097578478.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17995839044741255124.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17485695260097578478.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92646e+06,0.065007,7120,2,769,5,12902,6,0,370,18996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(A(AG(EX(((p35==1)&&(p96==1)))) U AG(((p20==1)&&(p12==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p20==1)&&(p12==1)))))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((p35==1)&&(p96==1))))))) * !(!(E...251
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t33, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,1.10121,48780,1,0,268,282163,164,139,2325,229104,309
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 104 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 94 transition count 75
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 94 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 87 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 86 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 86 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 85 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 85 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 84 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 84 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 83 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 83 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 82 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 82 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 81 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 81 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 80 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 80 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 79 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 79 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 78 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 78 transition count 59
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 73 transition count 54
Applied a total of 62 rules in 28 ms. Remains 73 /104 variables (removed 31) and now considering 54/85 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 73 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [6, 12, 17, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 53, 59, 64, 70, 72]
Discarding 16 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 16 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/104 places, 54/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 57 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 42 transition count 39
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 38 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 38 transition count 35
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 37 transition count 34
Applied a total of 40 rules in 5 ms. Remains 37 /57 variables (removed 20) and now considering 34/54 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 37 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/104 places, 34/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 165 ms. Remains : 37/104 places, 34/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16456027281024860976.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13390561126082664002.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16456027281024860976.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13390561126082664002.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,13633,0.008726,4060,2,183,5,1256,6,0,184,1347,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p2==1) + A(((p10==1)&&(p88==1)) U EF(((p24==1)&&(p100==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p2==1) + !((E(!(E(TRUE U ((p24==1)&&(p100==1)))) U (!(((p10==1)&&(p88==1))) * !(E(TRUE U ((p24==1)&...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t7, t29, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/...172
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.142661,11356,1,0,227,39547,104,160,1188,55800,258
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 104 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 94 transition count 75
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 94 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 87 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 86 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 86 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 85 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 85 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 84 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 84 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 83 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 83 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 82 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 82 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 81 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 81 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 80 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 80 transition count 61
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 79 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 79 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 78 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 78 transition count 59
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 72 transition count 53
Applied a total of 64 rules in 40 ms. Remains 72 /104 variables (removed 32) and now considering 53/85 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 72 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [5, 11, 16, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 52, 58, 63, 69, 71]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/104 places, 53/85 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 58 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 47 transition count 42
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 47 transition count 40
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 45 transition count 40
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 41 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 41 transition count 36
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 40 transition count 35
Applied a total of 36 rules in 6 ms. Remains 40 /58 variables (removed 18) and now considering 35/53 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 40 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 40/104 places, 35/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 181 ms. Remains : 40/104 places, 35/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 35 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18064026889130429337.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3387228389989268452.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18064026889130429337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3387228389989268452.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,10241,0.010283,4072,2,228,5,1399,6,0,193,1594,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(((p34==0)||(p91==0))) + EF(AG((p23==0)))) + EF((AF(((p10==1)&&(p88==1))) * ((p31==0)||(p85==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,((p34==0)||(p91==0)))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p23==0)))))] != FALSE) + [((Fwd...236
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 32/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.026341,4968,1,0,12,6073,19,4,971,4046,9
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 84/85 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 103 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 82, 88, 102]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/104 places, 84/85 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 92 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 92 transition count 82
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 92 /94 variables (removed 2) and now considering 82/84 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:54:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/104 places, 82/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 182 ms. Remains : 92/104 places, 82/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12369183450208119422.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability876305286457770777.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12369183450208119422.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability876305286457770777.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.18557e+06,0.076471,7588,2,1155,5,13861,6,0,450,18116,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF(AX(AX(((p7==1)&&(p72==1))))) * ((EF(((p98==0)||(p105==0))) + (EG((p2==0)) * EF(((p3==0)||(p82==0))))) + (((p49==0)&&((p17==0)||(p9...294
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(((p7==1)&&(p72==1))))))))))) * ((E(TRUE U ((p98==0)||(p105==0))) + (EG((p2==0))...418
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step enab...207
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,11.3232,385832,1,0,975,2.77177e+06,220,547,2843,1.82783e+06,1195
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 102 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 101 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 101 transition count 82
Applied a total of 6 rules in 12 ms. Remains 101 /104 variables (removed 3) and now considering 82/85 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 101 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned [7, 14, 28, 31, 34, 39, 80, 86, 92, 98, 100]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 140 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/104 places, 82/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 86 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 86 transition count 78
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 86 /90 variables (removed 4) and now considering 78/82 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 86 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 86/104 places, 78/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 325 ms. Remains : 86/104 places, 78/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17575197798334872071.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11960530236293840035.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17575197798334872071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11960530236293840035.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.96742e+06,0.066495,6932,2,811,5,11666,6,0,422,17079,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(EG(((((p21==0)||(p66==0))&&((p10==0)||(p88==0)))&&((p68==0)||(p23==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(((((p21==0)||(p66==0))&&((p10==0)||(p88==0)))&&((p68==0)||(p23==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t31, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.66986,85736,1,0,785,559018,184,411,2524,444668,882
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 26 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 26 transitions
Performed 26 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 96 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 58
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 70 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 56 transition count 48
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 56 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 52 transition count 44
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 51 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 51 transition count 43
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 43 transition count 35
Applied a total of 109 rules in 14 ms. Remains 43 /104 variables (removed 61) and now considering 35/85 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 43 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [28, 32, 36, 40]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/104 places, 35/85 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 36 transition count 32
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 36 transition count 32
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 36 /39 variables (removed 3) and now considering 32/35 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 36 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/104 places, 32/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 121 ms. Remains : 36/104 places, 32/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17300011596941610687.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8967007684320454030.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17300011596941610687.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8967007684320454030.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4864,0.008594,3924,2,105,5,731,6,0,179,711,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p99==0)||(p106==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p99==0)||(p106==0))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.019503,4308,1,0,8,2621,18,5,915,1818,10
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 102 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 101 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 101 transition count 82
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 101 /104 variables (removed 3) and now considering 82/85 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 101 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [7, 14, 28, 31, 34, 39, 80, 86, 98, 100]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/104 places, 82/85 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 88 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 88 transition count 79
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 88 /91 variables (removed 3) and now considering 79/82 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 88 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/104 places, 79/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 88/104 places, 79/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11736993526807349267.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13281271383917704861.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11736993526807349267.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13281271383917704861.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0724e+06,0.079625,7520,2,1029,5,14000,6,0,431,20407,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(EX((EX((p52==1)) * (((p33!=1)||((p20==1)&&(p95==1)))||((p4==1)&&(p76==1)))))) U ((EG(!(((p98==1)&&(p105==1)))) + A(((p1==1)&&(p58==1...345
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((EG(!(((p98==1)&&(p105==1)))) + !((E(!(((p21==1)&&(p44==1))) U (!(((p1==1)&&(p58==1))) * !(((p...1366
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t31, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,3.54679,130520,1,0,1035,851237,216,514,2609,697660,1279
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 23 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 23 transitions
Performed 23 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 23
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 73 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 72 transition count 60
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 72 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 58 transition count 50
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 58 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 54 transition count 46
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 53 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 53 transition count 45
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 45 transition count 37
Applied a total of 105 rules in 15 ms. Remains 45 /104 variables (removed 59) and now considering 37/85 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 45 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned [30, 34, 38, 42, 44]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 36 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/104 places, 37/85 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 36 transition count 33
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 36 transition count 33
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 35 transition count 32
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 35 /40 variables (removed 5) and now considering 32/37 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 35 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/104 places, 32/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 113 ms. Remains : 35/104 places, 32/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 224 steps (12 resets) in 6 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3134405699216293242.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8086569345045560656.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3134405699216293242.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8086569345045560656.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 84/85 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 103 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [14, 21, 31, 34, 39, 82, 88, 94, 100]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/104 places, 84/85 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 91 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 91 transition count 81
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 91 /94 variables (removed 3) and now considering 81/84 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 91 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/104 places, 81/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 182 ms. Remains : 91/104 places, 81/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13772289450922934664.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16485312230780828815.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13772289450922934664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16485312230780828815.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.08059e+06,0.083795,7856,2,1284,5,15640,6,0,443,21468,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p13!=1) U (AG(!(((p87==1)&&(p106==1)))) + (!(AG(A(((p28==1)&&(p45==1)) U ((p3==1)&&(p82==1))))) * E(!(E(((p15==1)&&(p60==1)) U (p20==1...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(p13!=1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(((p87==1)&&(p106==1)))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,(p13!=1)) * ...371
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step enab...207
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 76/0/5
(forward)formula 0,1,4.17223,150740,1,0,1085,981285,217,542,2855,813777,1260
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 102 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 101 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 101 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 100 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 100 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 99 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 99 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 98 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 97 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 97 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 96 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 95 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 95 transition count 76
Applied a total of 18 rules in 15 ms. Remains 95 /104 variables (removed 9) and now considering 76/85 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 28, 31, 34, 39, 74, 80, 86, 92, 94]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/104 places, 76/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 78 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 77 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 77 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 76 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 76 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 75 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 75 transition count 68
Applied a total of 16 rules in 2 ms. Remains 75 /83 variables (removed 8) and now considering 68/76 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 75 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 75/104 places, 68/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 176 ms. Remains : 75/104 places, 68/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8674751085188072124.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13780788394271308573.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8674751085188072124.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13780788394271308573.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92646e+06,0.069505,7120,2,769,5,12902,6,0,370,18996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((((p5==1)&&(p24==1))&&(p100==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((((p5==1)&&(p24==1))&&(p100==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t33, t41, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,0,0.75677,38040,1,0,314,178770,159,200,2128,246356,280
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 85/85 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 103 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 102 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 102 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 101 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 101 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 100 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 100 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 99 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 99 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 98 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 79
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 97 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 97 transition count 78
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 96 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 96 transition count 77
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 95 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 95 transition count 76
Applied a total of 18 rules in 15 ms. Remains 95 /104 variables (removed 9) and now considering 76/85 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned [7, 14, 21, 31, 34, 39, 74, 80, 86, 92, 94]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/104 places, 76/85 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 79 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 79 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 78 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 78 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 77 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 77 transition count 69
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 77 /84 variables (removed 7) and now considering 69/76 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 77 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 77/104 places, 69/85 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 179 ms. Remains : 77/104 places, 69/85 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4905033571100436556.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17033055110270659530.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4905033571100436556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17033055110270659530.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.93056e+06,0.065072,7128,2,856,5,12768,6,0,377,18938,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p36==0) + EX(((p28==0)||(p57==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p36==0))) * !(EX(((p28==0)||(p57==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t17, t19, t29, t41, t61, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
(forward)formula 0,1,0.170756,11096,1,0,140,39923,156,71,2120,30250,146
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-04a-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 38187 ms.

BK_STOP 1748624108437

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-04a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-04a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400490"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-04a.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-04a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;