Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400484.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-03b, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400484
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 428K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748623689687

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-03b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 16:48:10] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 16:48:10] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Transformed 298 places.
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Transformed 296 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 298 places and 296 transitions and 692 arcs in 174 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 35 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 296/296 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 264 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 264 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 264 transition count 257
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 251 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 251 transition count 244
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 249 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 249 transition count 242
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 248 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 248 transition count 241
Applied a total of 105 rules in 86 ms. Remains 248 /298 variables (removed 50) and now considering 241/296 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 248 cols
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 264 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 205 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 502 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:48:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/248 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 209 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 20/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 54 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 18/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 5/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 241/489 variables, 248/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/489 variables, 2/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 489/489 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 248/248 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/248 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 68/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/489 variables, 248/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 240/578 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 9/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 1/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 2/590 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 1)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 timeout
0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 489/489 variables, and 596 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 248/248 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60092ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60104ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 248/298 places, 241/296 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60722 ms. Remains : 248/298 places, 241/296 transitions.
Support contains 35 out of 248 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 16:49:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (250 resets) in 847 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 3/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (36 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (32 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (26 resets) in 65 ms. (606 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-05-30 16:49:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 126/131 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 99/230 variables, 9/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 168 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 18/248 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 241/489 variables, 248/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/489 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 489/489 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 756 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 248/248 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 24/25 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 205/230 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 18/248 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 241/489 variables, 248/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 1/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 1/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/489 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 489/489 variables, and 282 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 620 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 248/248 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/3 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1385ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 3447 steps, including 27 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 10 ms. (steps per millisecond=344 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 14 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 66 stabilizing places and 66 stable transitions
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0&&F(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 241 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 241 transition count 234
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 241 transition count 233
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 237 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 237 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 236 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 236 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 235 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 235 transition count 227
Applied a total of 27 rules in 32 ms. Remains 235 /248 variables (removed 13) and now considering 227/241 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 227 rows 235 cols
[2025-05-30 16:49:14] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:49:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 219 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 306 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 226 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:49:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 6/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 16/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 5/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 462/462 variables, and 311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved in 28306 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 226/226 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 54/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 226/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 4/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 1/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 2/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 2/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 462/462 variables, and 547 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 226/226 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 58346ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58347ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/248 places, 227/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58686 ms. Remains : 235/248 places, 227/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 293 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-00 finished in 59030 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0 U p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 83 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 83 transitions
Performed 83 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 83
Iterating post reduction 0 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 247 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 164 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 158 transition count 146
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 158 transition count 114
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 126 transition count 114
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 251 place count 122 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 122 transition count 110
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 122 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 118 transition count 106
Performed 43 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 5 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 75 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 74 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 357 place count 69 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 67 transition count 55
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 67 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 64 transition count 52
Applied a total of 365 rules in 57 ms. Remains 64 /248 variables (removed 184) and now considering 52/241 (removed 189) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 64 cols
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [25, 38, 49, 53, 58, 63]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/248 places, 52/241 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 54 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 54 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 53 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 53 transition count 47
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 52 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 52 transition count 46
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 51 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 51 transition count 45
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 50 transition count 44
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 50 /58 variables (removed 8) and now considering 44/52 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 50 cols
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 50/248 places, 44/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 264 ms. Remains : 50/248 places, 44/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-01
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 13 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-01 finished in 350 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G((p0&&F(p1)))||(X(((p0&&F(p1)) U (G((p0&&F(p1)))||(p0&&F(p1)&&X(!p2)))))&&F(p3)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 240 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 240 transition count 233
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 240 transition count 232
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 235 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 235 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 234 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 233 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 233 transition count 225
Applied a total of 31 rules in 33 ms. Remains 233 /248 variables (removed 15) and now considering 225/241 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:50:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:50:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60047ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/248 places, 225/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60348 ms. Remains : 233/248 places, 225/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 276 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) p2) (AND (NOT p1) p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1509 reset in 257 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1520 reset in 182 ms.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Detected a total of 57/233 stabilizing places and 57/225 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/4 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p3 p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 22 factoid took 138 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 15 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 92 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 449 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p3 p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 22 factoid took 161 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
[2025-05-30 16:51:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 21 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:51:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 21 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:51:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 124 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:51:15] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 224/321/224 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:51:15] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 21 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:51:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 21 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:51:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 105 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:51:16] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 224/321/224 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 12 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:51:16] [INFO ] Added : 214 causal constraints over 43 iterations in 891 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 1 out of 233 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 225/225 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 225/225 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 226 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60039ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60270 ms. Remains : 233/233 places, 225/225 transitions.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 68 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 115 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 442 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 112 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 97 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 21 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 21 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 121 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 224/321/224 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:52:18] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 21 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:52:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 21 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:52:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 108 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 16:52:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 224/321/224 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:52:19] [INFO ] Added : 214 causal constraints over 43 iterations in 885 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 793 reset in 130 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 794 reset in 147 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 1 out of 233 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 225/225 transitions.
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 233 transition count 225
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 233 transition count 222
Performed 33 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 33 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 233 transition count 222
Deduced a syphon composed of 106 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 233 transition count 222
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 174 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 174 transition count 163
Performed 54 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 5 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 101 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 174 transition count 158
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 174 transition count 157
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 314 place count 142 transition count 125
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 142 transition count 125
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 142 transition count 125
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 348 place count 141 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 349 place count 141 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 69 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 349 rules in 44 ms. Remains 141 /233 variables (removed 92) and now considering 124/225 (removed 101) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 141 cols
[2025-05-30 16:52:19] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/141 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 68 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 124/265 variables, 141/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 21/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 265/265 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved in 3870 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 66/137 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 21/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/141 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 124/265 variables, 141/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 21/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 54/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 265/265 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved in 5208 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9093ms problems are : Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 69 dead transitions in 9095ms
Found 69 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 69 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 69 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 141/233 places, 55/225 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 184 edges and 141 vertex of which 72 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 69 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 69 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 72 /141 variables (removed 69) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 72/233 places, 55/225 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 9154 ms. Remains : 72/233 places, 55/225 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin5038285261859270814
[2025-05-30 16:52:29] [INFO ] Built C files in 14ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin5038285261859270814
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5038285261859270814;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 439 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5038285261859270814;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 46 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin5038285261859270814;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9171004028836439598.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 1 out of 233 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 233/233 places, 225/225 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 233 /233 variables (removed 0) and now considering 225/225 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 16:52:44] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:52:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 226 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:52:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60278 ms. Remains : 233/233 places, 225/225 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16390231631558566512
[2025-05-30 16:53:44] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16390231631558566512
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16390231631558566512;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 313 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16390231631558566512;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 27 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16390231631558566512;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased11914736592577360604.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 16:53:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14818392596241855650.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL12896670774649651467.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14818392596241855650.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut5816833990150625419.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL12896670774649651467.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...319
Loading property file /tmp/LTL12896670774649651467.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut5816833990150625419.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:54:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL13005586172735969349.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL2631324140601797955.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL13005586172735969349.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL2631324140601797955.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G(("(p221!=1)")&&(F("(p37==1)"))))||((X((("(p221!=1)")&&(F("(p37==1)")))U((G(("(p221!=1)")&&(F("(p37==1)"))))||((("(p221!=1)")&&...231
Formula 0 simplified : G(F(!"(p221!=1)" | G!"(p37==1)") & (G!"(p149!=1)" | X((!"(p221!=1)" | G!"(p37==1)") M (!"(p221!=1)" | G!"(p37==1)" | X"((p110==1)&&(...169
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1959005206821821305.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1959005206821821305.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1959005206821821305.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1959005206821821305.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1959005206821821305.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL7085621718185111792.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL1444940948522041206.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL7085621718185111792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL1444940948522041206.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...254
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G(("(i15.i2.u68.p221!=1)")&&(F("(i1.u10.p37==1)"))))||((X((("(i15.i2.u68.p221!=1)")&&(F("(i1.u10.p37==1)")))U((G(("(i15.i2.u68.p...327
Formula 0 simplified : G(F(!"(i15.i2.u68.p221!=1)" | G!"(i1.u10.p37==1)") & (G!"(i7.i1.u40.p149!=1)" | X((!"(i15.i2.u68.p221!=1)" | G!"(i1.u10.p37==1)") M ...247
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t79, t92, t106, t130, t137, t164, t179, t232, t233, t235, i0.u8.t0, i0.u8.t188, i1.u9.t1, i1....579
Computing Next relation with stutter on 120 deadlock states
4 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
314 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,3.19033,140916,1,0,336556,170,2810,269808,123,346,475071
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-02 finished in 259820 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(!(G((X(X(X(p0))) U p1)) U (p0 U p2)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 241 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 241 transition count 234
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 241 transition count 233
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 237 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 237 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 236 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 236 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 235 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 235 transition count 227
Applied a total of 27 rules in 26 ms. Remains 235 /248 variables (removed 13) and now considering 227/241 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 227 rows 235 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:33] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 281 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 226 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 17/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 462/462 variables, and 304 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved in 26995 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 226/226 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 226/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 9/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 1/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 2/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 2/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 462/462 variables, and 545 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 226/226 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57028ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57029ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/248 places, 227/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57339 ms. Remains : 235/248 places, 227/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 449 ms :[p2, p2, (AND p2 p1 p0), p2, (AND p1 p2), (AND p2 p1 p0), (AND p2 p1 p0), (AND p2 p1 p0), (AND p2 p1 p0), (AND p2 p1 p0), (AND p2 p1 p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 87 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 97 ms.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Detected a total of 57/235 stabilizing places and 57/227 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 16 factoid took 157 ms. Reduced automaton from 11 states, 39 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 34 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 391 ms :[(AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (247 resets) in 224 ms. (177 steps per ms) remains 5/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (29 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (25 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (25 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (26 resets) in 52 ms. (754 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (26 resets) in 70 ms. (563 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-05-30 16:55:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 77/80 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/217 variables, 18/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 18/235 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 462/462 variables, and 264 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 773 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 77/80 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/217 variables, 18/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 18/235 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 5/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 462/462 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 485 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1267ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 893 steps, including 6 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=148 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 118 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 16 factoid took 575 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 34 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 34 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 398 ms :[(AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 401 ms :[(AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0)]
Support contains 3 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 227/227 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 235 /235 variables (removed 0) and now considering 227/227 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:55:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 226 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 17/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 462/462 variables, and 304 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved in 26820 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 226/226 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 226/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 9/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 1/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 2/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 2/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 56874ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56874ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57116 ms. Remains : 235/235 places, 227/227 transitions.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Detected a total of 57/235 stabilizing places and 57/227 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 122 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 34 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 34 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 395 ms :[(AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (250 resets) in 273 ms. (145 steps per ms) remains 5/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (26 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (25 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (25 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (24 resets) in 52 ms. (754 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (25 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-05-30 16:56:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 77/80 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/217 variables, 18/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 18/235 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 462/462 variables, and 264 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 793 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 77/80 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 137/217 variables, 18/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 18/235 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 5/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 462/462 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 496 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1293ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 889 steps, including 6 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=127 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 114 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 576 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 34 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 34 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 459 ms :[(AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 455 ms :[(AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 440 ms :[(AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0), (AND p1 p2 p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 87 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20000 reset in 93 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin12718636785135331048
[2025-05-30 16:56:36] [INFO ] Built C files in 5ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin12718636785135331048
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12718636785135331048;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 321 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12718636785135331048;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 40 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin12718636785135331048;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased2355368918019761814.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 65 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-05 finished in 123534 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G((p0||X(p1)))&&X(F(p2))))'
Support contains 3 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 240 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 240 transition count 233
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 240 transition count 232
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 235 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 235 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 234 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 233 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 233 transition count 225
Applied a total of 31 rules in 21 ms. Remains 233 /248 variables (removed 15) and now considering 225/241 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 16:56:37] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60039ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60039ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/248 places, 225/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60254 ms. Remains : 233/248 places, 225/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 172 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), true]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 9 steps with 2 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-07 finished in 60442 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 85 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 85 transitions
Performed 85 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 85
Iterating post reduction 0 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 247 transition count 155
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 162 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 156 transition count 144
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 156 transition count 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 124 transition count 112
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 256 place count 119 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 119 transition count 107
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 119 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 115 transition count 103
Performed 41 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 5 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 74 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 352 place count 73 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 68 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 66 transition count 54
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 66 transition count 51
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 63 transition count 51
Applied a total of 367 rules in 23 ms. Remains 63 /248 variables (removed 185) and now considering 51/241 (removed 190) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 63 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [36, 47, 51, 56, 62]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/248 places, 51/241 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 55 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 55 transition count 48
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 53 transition count 46
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /58 variables (removed 5) and now considering 46/51 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 53 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 53/248 places, 46/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 53/248 places, 46/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 12 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-08 finished in 205 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(p0)||(X(p1) U ((!p2&&X(p1))||X(G(p1))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 242 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 242 transition count 235
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 242 transition count 234
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 239 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 239 transition count 231
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 238 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 238 transition count 230
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 237 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 237 transition count 229
Applied a total of 23 rules in 22 ms. Remains 237 /248 variables (removed 11) and now considering 229/241 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 229 rows 237 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 228 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 15/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 9/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 229/466 variables, 237/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 57 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/466 variables, 4/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 466/466 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 228/228 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 50/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 229/466 variables, 237/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 228/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 6/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 3/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 4/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 466/466 variables, and 551 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 228/228 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60032ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60032ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/248 places, 229/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60262 ms. Remains : 237/248 places, 229/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 127 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 117 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 116 ms.
Computed a total of 61 stabilizing places and 61 stable transitions
Computed a total of 61 stabilizing places and 61 stable transitions
Detected a total of 61/237 stabilizing places and 61/229 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1))))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to conjunction of knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 25 factoid took 176 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 13 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-09 finished in 60827 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 84 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 84 transitions
Performed 84 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 84
Iterating post reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 247 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 84 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 163 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 157 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 156 transition count 144
Performed 33 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 33 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 156 transition count 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 123 transition count 111
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 118 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 118 transition count 106
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 118 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 114 transition count 102
Performed 41 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 5 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 73 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 354 place count 72 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 67 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 65 transition count 53
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 363 place count 65 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 369 place count 62 transition count 50
Applied a total of 369 rules in 23 ms. Remains 62 /248 variables (removed 186) and now considering 50/241 (removed 191) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 62 cols
[2025-05-30 16:58:38] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [47, 51, 56, 61]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/248 places, 50/241 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 56 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 56 transition count 48
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 53 transition count 45
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 53 /58 variables (removed 5) and now considering 45/50 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 53 cols
[2025-05-30 16:58:38] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:58:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:58:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 53/248 places, 45/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 153 ms. Remains : 53/248 places, 45/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 55 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8143 reset in 139 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 18161 steps with 1478 reset with depth 8 and stack size 8 in 29 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-10 finished in 386 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(!p0) U (p1&&X(p2))))'
Support contains 4 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 240 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 240 transition count 233
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 240 transition count 232
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 235 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 235 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 234 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 233 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 233 transition count 225
Applied a total of 31 rules in 19 ms. Remains 233 /248 variables (removed 15) and now considering 225/241 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 16:58:39] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:58:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:58:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60036ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60036ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/248 places, 225/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60299 ms. Remains : 233/248 places, 225/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 138 ms :[(NOT p2), true, (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 100 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-12 finished in 60459 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((G((p0 U p1)) U (p2&&G(!p0)))||X(X(F(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 248 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 248/248 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 241 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 241 transition count 234
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 241 transition count 233
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 236 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 236 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 235 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 235 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 234 transition count 226
Applied a total of 29 rules in 19 ms. Remains 234 /248 variables (removed 14) and now considering 226/241 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 8/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 4/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 9/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 27072 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 55/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 225/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 544 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 57095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/248 places, 226/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57330 ms. Remains : 234/248 places, 226/241 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 193 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 911 reset in 130 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 902 reset in 147 ms.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Detected a total of 57/234 stabilizing places and 57/226 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 111 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 394 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 156 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
[2025-05-30 17:00:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 21 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:00:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 21 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:00:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 199 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:00:38] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 21 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:00:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 21 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:00:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 118 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:00:38] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 225/322/225 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Added : 216 causal constraints over 44 iterations in 878 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 1 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 226/226 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 234 /234 variables (removed 0) and now considering 226/226 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 225 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 8/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 11/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 4/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 9/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 27400 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 55/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 225/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 544 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 57428ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57429ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57660 ms. Remains : 234/234 places, 226/226 transitions.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 60 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 433 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 85 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
[2025-05-30 17:01:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 21 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:01:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 21 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:01:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 182 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:01:37] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 21 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:01:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 21 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:01:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 124 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 17:01:37] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 225/322/225 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:01:38] [INFO ] Added : 216 causal constraints over 44 iterations in 844 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 907 reset in 126 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 911 reset in 151 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 1 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 226/226 transitions.
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 234 transition count 226
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 234 transition count 222
Performed 35 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 35 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 234 transition count 222
Deduced a syphon composed of 109 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 234 transition count 222
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 175 place count 172 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 172 transition count 160
Performed 52 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 4 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 100 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 172 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 172 transition count 155
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 320 place count 142 transition count 125
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 142 transition count 125
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 142 transition count 125
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 352 place count 141 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 141 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 353 rules in 21 ms. Remains 141 /234 variables (removed 93) and now considering 124/226 (removed 102) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 141 cols
[2025-05-30 17:01:39] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/141 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 69 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 124/265 variables, 141/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 21/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 265/265 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved in 4012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 67/137 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 21/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/141 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 124/265 variables, 141/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 21/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 53/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/265 variables, 0/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 265/265 variables, and 258 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved in 8218 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/20 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12257ms problems are : Problem set: 70 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 70 dead transitions in 12257ms
Found 70 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 70 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 70 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 141/234 places, 54/226 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 183 edges and 141 vertex of which 71 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 70 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 70 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 71 /141 variables (removed 70) and now considering 54/54 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 71/234 places, 54/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 12287 ms. Remains : 71/234 places, 54/226 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin10428345942650473208
[2025-05-30 17:01:51] [INFO ] Built C files in 9ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin10428345942650473208
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10428345942650473208;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 315 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin10428345942650473208;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 38 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin10428345942650473208;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9277624508261160500.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 1 out of 234 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 234/234 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 233 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 233 transition count 225
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 233 /234 variables (removed 1) and now considering 225/226 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 17:02:06] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 17:02:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:02:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60033ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/234 places, 225/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60265 ms. Remains : 233/234 places, 225/226 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2250330974538249049
[2025-05-30 17:03:07] [INFO ] Built C files in 3ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2250330974538249049
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2250330974538249049;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 323 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2250330974538249049;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 34 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2250330974538249049;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased14772001071286768982.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 17:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL13488201714606207126.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL9583955315948397825.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL13488201714606207126.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut15896811119811777534.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL9583955315948397825.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...319
Loading property file /tmp/LTL9583955315948397825.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut15896811119811777534.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:03:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL15961900337661277632.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL8392930689680807309.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL15961900337661277632.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL8392930689680807309.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((((G(("(p290!=1)")U("(p75==1)")))U(("(p112==1)")&&(G("(p290==1)"))))||(X(X(F("(p75==1)"))))))
Formula 0 simplified : (F(!"(p290!=1)" R !"(p75==1)") R (!"(p112==1)" | F!"(p290==1)")) & XXG!"(p75==1)"
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13931212420723222734.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13931212420723222734.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13931212420723222734.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13931212420723222734.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13931212420723222734.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 47 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14391190913574690214.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 17:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL9895558887532502003.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14391190913574690214.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL9895558887532502003.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((((G(("(i17.i0.u96.p290!=1)")U("(i6.u23.p75==1)")))U(("(i9.u32.p112==1)")&&(G("(i17.i0.u96.p290==1)"))))||(X(X(F("(i6.u23.p75==1)"))...159
Formula 0 simplified : (F(!"(i17.i0.u96.p290!=1)" R !"(i6.u23.p75==1)") R (!"(i9.u32.p112==1)" | F!"(i17.i0.u96.p290==1)")) & XXG!"(i6.u23.p75==1)"
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t79, t103, t106, t130, t137, t155, t164, t179, t231, t232, t233, t235, i0.t92, i0.t89, i0.i2....606
Computing Next relation with stutter on 120 deadlock states
4 unique states visited
4 strongly connected components in search stack
4 transitions explored
4 items max in DFS search stack
589 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,5.93912,239792,1,0,612715,223,2904,438142,163,600,856962
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 0 is FALSE accepting run found.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLFireability-14 finished in 259966 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 948596 ms.

BK_STOP 1748624639494

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-03b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-03b, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400484"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-03b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-03b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;