Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400483.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-03b, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400483
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 428K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748623254088

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-03b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 16:40:55] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 16:40:55] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 16:40:55] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 76 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:55] [INFO ] Transformed 298 places.
[2025-05-30 16:40:55] [INFO ] Transformed 296 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:40:55] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 16:40:55] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 298 places and 296 transitions and 692 arcs in 173 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 11 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 22 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 296/296 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 260 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 260 transition count 258
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 260 transition count 253
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 95 place count 246 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 246 transition count 239
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 243 transition count 236
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 243 transition count 236
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 241 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 241 transition count 234
Applied a total of 119 rules in 88 ms. Remains 241 /298 variables (removed 57) and now considering 234/296 (removed 62) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 234 rows 241 cols
[2025-05-30 16:40:55] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 20 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 266 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:40:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 476 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 233 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:40:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 15/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 3/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 6/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 234/475 variables, 241/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/475 variables, 4/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 5/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 475/475 variables, and 320 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 233/233 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 56/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 4/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 234/475 variables, 241/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 233/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 3/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 1/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 1/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60085ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 233 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60095ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 241/298 places, 234/296 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60678 ms. Remains : 241/298 places, 234/296 transitions.
Support contains 22 out of 241 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 234 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 15 to 14
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (250 resets) in 1212 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 7/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (36 resets) in 242 ms. (164 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (25 resets) in 215 ms. (185 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (24 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (27 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (35 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (24 resets) in 155 ms. (256 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (28 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-05-30 16:41:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 167/177 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 49/226 variables, 8/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 15/241 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 8/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 234/475 variables, 241/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/475 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 475/475 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 1618 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 167/177 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 49/226 variables, 8/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 15/241 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 5/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 234/475 variables, 241/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 7/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 152 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 3/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 2/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/475 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 475/475 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved in 2753 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4387ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Fused 7 Parikh solutions to 6 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 567 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 241 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 234/234 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 82 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 82 transitions
Performed 82 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 82
Iterating post reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 241 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 82 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 159 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 153 transition count 142
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 153 transition count 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 121 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 120 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 120 transition count 109
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 120 transition count 108
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 119 transition count 108
Performed 44 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 6 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 75 transition count 58
Free-agglomeration rule applied 12 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 75 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 63 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 62 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 58 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 57 transition count 44
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 57 transition count 41
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 54 transition count 41
Applied a total of 373 rules in 79 ms. Remains 54 /241 variables (removed 187) and now considering 41/234 (removed 193) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 79 ms. Remains : 54/241 places, 41/234 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 251 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (35 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Computed a total of 60 stabilizing places and 60 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F((p0&&F(p1)))&&X(G(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 241 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 234/234 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 236 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 236 transition count 229
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 236 transition count 228
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 234 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 233 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 233 transition count 225
Applied a total of 17 rules in 17 ms. Remains 233 /241 variables (removed 8) and now considering 225/234 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 16:42:03] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:42:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 265 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:42:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 147 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 146 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 110 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 93 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/241 places, 225/234 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60350 ms. Remains : 233/241 places, 225/234 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 265 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 623 steps with 3 reset in 8 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 60918 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 241 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 234/234 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 79 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 79 transitions
Performed 79 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 79
Iterating post reduction 0 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 240 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 161 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 157 transition count 147
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 157 transition count 115
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 125 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 123 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 123 transition count 113
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 123 transition count 111
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 121 transition count 111
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 6 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 75 transition count 59
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 74 transition count 59
Applied a total of 335 rules in 25 ms. Remains 74 /241 variables (removed 167) and now considering 59/234 (removed 175) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 74 cols
[2025-05-30 16:43:03] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [24, 25, 26, 31, 32, 43, 54, 60, 66, 73]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/241 places, 59/234 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 64 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 60 transition count 55
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 56 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 56 transition count 51
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 55 transition count 50
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 55 transition count 50
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 54 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 54 transition count 49
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 53 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 53 transition count 48
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 52 transition count 47
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -19
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 51 transition count 66
Applied a total of 26 rules in 11 ms. Remains 51 /64 variables (removed 13) and now considering 66/59 (removed -7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 51 cols
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 26 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/241 places, 66/234 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 210 ms. Remains : 51/241 places, 66/234 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6651 reset in 211 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 48359 steps with 3220 reset with depth 11 and stack size 11 in 87 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 589 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0&&X((X(p1)||F(p2)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 241 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 234/234 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 237 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 237 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 237 transition count 229
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 235 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 235 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 234 transition count 226
Applied a total of 15 rules in 20 ms. Remains 234 /241 variables (removed 7) and now considering 226/234 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 13/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 3/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 7/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 3/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 307 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 26749 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 51/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 225/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 6/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 546 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 56798ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56799ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/241 places, 226/234 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57027 ms. Remains : 234/241 places, 226/234 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 286 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 156 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 57344 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X((!p1 U (p2||G(!p1))))&&p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 241 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 234/234 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 237 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 237 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 237 transition count 229
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 235 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 235 transition count 227
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 234 transition count 226
Applied a total of 15 rules in 13 ms. Remains 234 /241 variables (removed 7) and now considering 226/234 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-30 16:44:01] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:44:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 268 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 428 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:44:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 3/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 12/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 4/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 29492 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 40/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 7/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 225/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 7/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 4/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 546 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 59530ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59531ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/241 places, 226/234 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59975 ms. Remains : 234/241 places, 226/234 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 60146 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((X(X(!p0))||F(((!p1&&X(F(!p1)))||G(F(!p1))))) U (p2&&(X(X(!p0))||F(((!p1&&X(F(!p1)))||G(F(!p1)))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 241 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 234/234 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 237 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 237 transition count 230
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 235 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 235 transition count 228
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 234 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 234 transition count 227
Applied a total of 14 rules in 8 ms. Remains 234 /241 variables (removed 7) and now considering 227/234 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 227 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-30 16:45:02] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:45:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 262 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 226 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:45:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 14/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 227/461 variables, 234/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 2/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/461 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 461/461 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved in 23283 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 226/226 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 38/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 227/461 variables, 234/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 226/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 3/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 4/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 8/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 461/461 variables, and 540 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 226/226 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 53330ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53330ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/241 places, 227/234 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53603 ms. Remains : 234/241 places, 227/234 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 290 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND p0 p1)), (OR (NOT p2) (AND p0 p1)), (AND p1 p0), (AND p1 p0), (AND p1 p0), (AND p1 p0), p1, false]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 472 steps with 2 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 53925 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||F(G(p1))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 241 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 234/234 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 236 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 236 transition count 229
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 236 transition count 228
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 234 transition count 226
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 233 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 233 transition count 225
Applied a total of 17 rules in 9 ms. Remains 233 /241 variables (removed 8) and now considering 225/234 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 16:45:55] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:45:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:45:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/241 places, 225/234 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60273 ms. Remains : 233/241 places, 225/234 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-11
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 162 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 60420 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 241 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 234/234 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 237 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 237 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 237 transition count 229
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 236 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 236 transition count 228
Applied a total of 11 rules in 9 ms. Remains 236 /241 variables (removed 5) and now considering 228/234 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-30 16:46:56] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:46:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 262 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 227 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:46:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 12/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 228/464 variables, 236/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 464/464 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 48/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 228/464 variables, 236/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 227/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 11/550 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 3/553 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 464/464 variables, and 560 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60036ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/241 places, 228/234 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60309 ms. Remains : 236/241 places, 228/234 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 622 reset in 130 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 626 reset in 156 ms.
Computed a total of 58 stabilizing places and 58 stable transitions
Computed a total of 58 stabilizing places and 58 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 71 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[true, (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (248 resets) in 309 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (26 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 7501 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 35 ms. (steps per millisecond=214 )
Probabilistic random walk after 7501 steps, saw 2932 distinct states, run finished after 42 ms. (steps per millisecond=178 ) properties seen :1
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(F (NOT p0))
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 173 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property AutoFlight-PT-03b-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 61214 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 422239 ms.

BK_STOP 1748623677730

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-03b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-03b, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400483"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-03b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-03b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;