Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400482.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-03b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400482
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 428K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748623225142

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-03b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 74 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Transformed 298 places.
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Transformed 296 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 298 places and 296 transitions and 692 arcs in 167 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 109 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 296/296 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 281 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 281 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 281 transition count 275
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 277 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 277 transition count 271
Applied a total of 46 rules in 64 ms. Remains 277 /298 variables (removed 21) and now considering 271/296 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 271 rows 277 cols
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 21 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 263 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:40:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 495 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 270 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:40:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/277 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 97 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 64 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 6/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 6/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 271/548 variables, 277/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 371 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 277/277 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 270/270 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/277 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 72/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 8/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 271/548 variables, 277/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 270/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 10/660 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 8/668 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 670 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 277/277 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 270/270 constraints, Known Traps: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60136ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60159ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 277/298 places, 271/296 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60737 ms. Remains : 277/298 places, 271/296 transitions.
Support contains 109 out of 277 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (250 resets) in 1727 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 12/79 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (36 resets) in 229 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (25 resets) in 128 ms. (310 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (25 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 10/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (26 resets) in 128 ms. (310 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (26 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (30 resets) in 251 ms. (158 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (25 resets) in 60 ms. (655 steps per ms) remains 7/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (26 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (26 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 220/235 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 26/261 variables, 5/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 16/277 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 13/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 271/548 variables, 277/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/548 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 548/548 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved in 1842 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 277/277 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 124/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 129/261 variables, 14/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 16/277 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 7/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 271/548 variables, 277/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 5/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/548 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/548 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 2/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/548 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/548 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 548/548 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved in 2065 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 277/277 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/7 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3914ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 453 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 277 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 97 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 97 transitions
Performed 97 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 97
Iterating post reduction 0 with 97 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 277 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 97 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 107 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 180 transition count 164
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 176 transition count 164
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 176 transition count 125
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 137 transition count 125
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 306 place count 117 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 117 transition count 105
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 117 transition count 97
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 109 transition count 97
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 3 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 75 transition count 60
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 75 transition count 59
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 74 transition count 59
Free-agglomeration rule applied 12 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 74 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 437 place count 62 transition count 47
Applied a total of 437 rules in 48 ms. Remains 62 /277 variables (removed 215) and now considering 47/271 (removed 224) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 62/277 places, 47/271 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 13528 steps (3 resets) in 154 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 16:41:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
Computed a total of 84 stabilizing places and 84 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 97 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 97 transitions
Performed 97 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 97
Iterating post reduction 0 with 97 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 276 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 97 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 179 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 173 transition count 159
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 172 transition count 159
Performed 38 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 38 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 172 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 134 transition count 121
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 310 place count 115 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 115 transition count 102
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 115 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 108 transition count 95
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 76 transition count 63
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 76 transition count 59
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 72 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 71 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 67 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 66 transition count 53
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 66 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 432 place count 63 transition count 50
Applied a total of 432 rules in 27 ms. Remains 63 /277 variables (removed 214) and now considering 50/271 (removed 221) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 63 cols
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [25, 36, 47, 52, 57, 62]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/277 places, 50/271 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 53 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 53 transition count 46
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 52 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 52 transition count 45
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 51 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 51 transition count 44
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 50 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 50 transition count 43
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 49 transition count 42
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 49 /57 variables (removed 8) and now considering 42/50 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 49 cols
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 49/277 places, 42/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 49/277 places, 42/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10168821596665608269.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16564806334139397134.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10168821596665608269.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16564806334139397134.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,158976,0.019046,4072,2,157,5,1146,6,0,238,1261,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((p155==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p155==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 40/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.037654,5096,1,0,10,6375,20,3,1145,5218,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 253 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 253 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 253 transition count 245
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 242 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 242 transition count 234
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 239 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 239 transition count 231
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 236 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 236 transition count 228
Applied a total of 84 rules in 38 ms. Remains 236 /277 variables (removed 41) and now considering 228/271 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 227 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 7/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 11/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 228/464 variables, 236/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 4/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/464 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 464/464 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 23178 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 44/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 7/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 228/464 variables, 236/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 227/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 9/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 4/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 9/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 464/464 variables, and 561 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 53218ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53219ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/277 places, 228/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53465 ms. Remains : 236/277 places, 228/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5288594906786744533.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8085981862947031202.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5288594906786744533.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8085981862947031202.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.05829e+17,5.27316,146088,2,52503,5,496154,6,0,1174,871135,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13924550829118343874.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13924550829118343874.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13924550829118343874.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13924550829118343874.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13924550829118343874.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 157 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability795246820235784127.gal : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11491753021941229594.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability795246820235784127.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11491753021941229594.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.05829e+17,0.372379,19536,2943,13,31591,187,488,45650,28,336,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EG(A((i19.u85.p254==1) U (i5.u22.p68==1)))) * (!(A((i17.i2.u101.p295==1) U (i13.u51.p176==1))) + ((i10.i1.u42.p149==1) * AG(AX(((i...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!((E(!((i5.u22.p68==1)) U (!((i19.u85.p254==1)) * !((i5.u22.p68==1)))) + EG(!((i5...663
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t73, t76, t87, t90, t103, t121, t128, t151, t166, t219, t220, t222, i0.u31.t8, i0.u31.t124, i...582
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 95 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 95 transitions
Performed 95 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 95
Iterating post reduction 0 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 276 transition count 175
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 107 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 181 transition count 163
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 175 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 173 transition count 160
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 173 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 134 transition count 121
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 310 place count 115 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 115 transition count 102
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 115 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 108 transition count 95
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 77 transition count 64
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 77 transition count 60
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 74 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 73 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 69 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 68 transition count 55
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 68 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 65 transition count 52
Applied a total of 428 rules in 39 ms. Remains 65 /277 variables (removed 212) and now considering 52/271 (removed 219) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 65 cols
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [27, 38, 49, 54, 59, 64]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/277 places, 52/271 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 55 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 55 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 54 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 54 transition count 47
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 53 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 53 transition count 46
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 52 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 52 transition count 45
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 51 transition count 44
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 51 /59 variables (removed 8) and now considering 44/52 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 51 cols
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/277 places, 44/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 312 ms. Remains : 51/277 places, 44/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14018591331912720215.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6071712060340577365.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14018591331912720215.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6071712060340577365.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,279936,0.018531,4120,2,208,5,1249,6,0,245,1221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((p35==0)&&((p103==0)||(p281==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((p35==0)&&((p103==0)||(p281==0))))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 38/6/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.048624,5400,1,0,10,9124,19,3,1207,6577,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 96 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 96 transitions
Performed 96 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 96
Iterating post reduction 0 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 276 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 96 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 109 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 180 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 174 transition count 161
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 174 transition count 122
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 289 place count 135 transition count 122
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 307 place count 117 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 117 transition count 104
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 117 transition count 97
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 110 transition count 97
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 78 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 78 transition count 61
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 74 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 73 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 69 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 68 transition count 55
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 68 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 65 transition count 52
Applied a total of 428 rules in 19 ms. Remains 65 /277 variables (removed 212) and now considering 52/271 (removed 219) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 65 cols
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [25, 36, 54, 59, 64]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 97 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/277 places, 52/271 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 57 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 57 transition count 49
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 56 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 56 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 55 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 55 transition count 47
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 54 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 54 transition count 46
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 52 transition count 44
Applied a total of 16 rules in 5 ms. Remains 52 /60 variables (removed 8) and now considering 44/52 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 52 cols
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/277 places, 44/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 274 ms. Remains : 52/277 places, 44/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16459371340662501144.gal : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4629897430055774985.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16459371340662501144.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4629897430055774985.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,290304,0.009145,4128,2,222,5,1195,6,0,248,1011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p253!=1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p253!=1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 42/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.031829,5024,1,0,9,6970,19,3,1213,2770,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 254 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 254 transition count 248
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 254 transition count 246
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 242 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 242 transition count 234
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 239 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 239 transition count 231
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 236 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 236 transition count 228
Applied a total of 84 rules in 16 ms. Remains 236 /277 variables (removed 41) and now considering 228/271 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 335 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 227 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:43:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 228/464 variables, 236/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 5/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 4/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 2/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 464/464 variables, and 315 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 56/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 228/464 variables, 236/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 227/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 2/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/550 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 4/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 464/464 variables, and 555 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/277 places, 228/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60405 ms. Remains : 236/277 places, 228/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8031496104055799574.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13404948019567568411.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8031496104055799574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13404948019567568411.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.29128e+17,3.1185,94016,2,40811,5,326386,6,0,1174,532801,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:44:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:44:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14061698257809285597.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14061698257809285597.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14061698257809285597.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14061698257809285597.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14061698257809285597.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 44 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 18 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2259687718915898996.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12533765944263175666.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2259687718915898996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12533765944263175666.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.29128e+17,0.125234,8420,1144,14,9037,194,485,10370,30,360,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(EX((((i9.u35.p119==0)&&(i0.i2.u42.p147==0))&&(i0.i1.u38.p146==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(EX((((i9.u35.p119==0)&&(i0.i2.u42.p147==0))&&(i0.i1.u38.p146==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t74, t77, t87, t90, t129, t151, t166, t219, t220, t222, i0.t100, i0.i1.t105, i0.i1.u39.t113, ...628
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 255 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 255 transition count 249
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 255 transition count 247
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 245 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 245 transition count 237
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 243 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 243 transition count 235
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 241 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 241 transition count 233
Applied a total of 74 rules in 18 ms. Remains 241 /277 variables (removed 36) and now considering 233/271 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 241 cols
[2025-05-30 16:45:29] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:45:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:45:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 101 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 285 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 20/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 233 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 233/474 variables, 241/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 6/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 2/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/474 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 474/474 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/241 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 54/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 233/474 variables, 241/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 232/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 2/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 1/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 7/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 474/474 variables, and 562 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 241/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60066ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60066ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 241/277 places, 233/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60346 ms. Remains : 241/277 places, 233/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 233 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5638042059406313050.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3131474414478234458.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5638042059406313050.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3131474414478234458.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.35382e+17,11.9982,309540,2,72195,5,1.01489e+06,6,0,1199,1.94499e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9746009926186047924.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9746009926186047924.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9746009926186047924.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9746009926186047924.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9746009926186047924.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17346347503494229491.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5009443571887020659.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17346347503494229491.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5009443571887020659.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.35382e+17,0.273895,15040,2789,16,23465,223,528,29336,35,469,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX((((i7.u29.p102==0) + AF((i2.u13.p38==0))) + AG((i6.u28.p92==0))))) + (EX(AX(E(((i2.u11.p29==1)||(i12.u44.p163==1)) U A((i18.i0.u91...236
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((((i7.u29.p102==0) + !(EG(!((i2.u13.p38==0))))) + !(E(TRUE U !((i6.u28.p92==0)))))))))] != FA...438
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t77, t101, t104, t122, t129, t155, t170, t224, t225, t227, i0.t87, i0.i1.t89, i1.u7.t0, i1.u7...643
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 89 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 89 transitions
Performed 89 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 89
Iterating post reduction 0 with 89 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 276 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 89 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 99 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 187 transition count 171
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 183 transition count 168
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 180 transition count 168
Performed 37 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 37 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 180 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 143 transition count 131
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 289 place count 126 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 126 transition count 114
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 126 transition count 108
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 120 transition count 108
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 86 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 86 transition count 70
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 83 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 82 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 78 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 77 transition count 65
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 77 transition count 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 74 transition count 62
Applied a total of 409 rules in 49 ms. Remains 74 /277 variables (removed 203) and now considering 62/271 (removed 209) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 74 cols
[2025-05-30 16:47:29] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [43, 61, 73]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/277 places, 62/271 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 71 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 70 transition count 61
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 67 transition count 58
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 67 /71 variables (removed 4) and now considering 58/62 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 67 cols
[2025-05-30 16:47:29] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 67/277 places, 58/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 254 ms. Remains : 67/277 places, 58/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9215170213519739274.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7965251114575824288.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9215170213519739274.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7965251114575824288.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.26208e+06,0.026601,4404,2,492,5,2887,6,0,324,2469,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(!(E(((p153==1)&&(p102==1)) U ((p211==1)||((p90==1)&&(p227==1)))))) + EG(!(E(AG(((p263==1)||(p258==1))) U ((AF((p278==1)) * (p64==1)) ...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(EG(!(E(!(E(TRUE U !(((p263==1)||(p258==1))))) U ((!(EG(!((p278==1)))) * (p64==1)) * (p264=...241
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, t44, t55, t57, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/int...179
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.10203,82704,1,0,776,490602,164,424,2028,512675,814
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 252 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 252 transition count 246
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 252 transition count 244
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 239 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 239 transition count 231
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 236 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 236 transition count 228
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 233 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 233 transition count 225
Applied a total of 90 rules in 16 ms. Remains 233 /277 variables (removed 44) and now considering 225/271 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 16:47:32] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:47:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:47:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60067ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/277 places, 225/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60359 ms. Remains : 233/277 places, 225/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:48:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 225 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:48:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6166114042427613732.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13842491265093844580.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6166114042427613732.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13842491265093844580.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.14476e+17,2.94935,91672,2,38479,5,316411,6,0,1159,509810,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph259144778610140181.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph259144778610140181.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph259144778610140181.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph259144778610140181.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph259144778610140181.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability238301361618968657.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10417126297735880614.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability238301361618968657.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10417126297735880614.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.14476e+17,0.195435,10036,1436,14,12445,190,500,14354,28,415,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(EX((i14.i0.u52.p189==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(EX((i14.i0.u52.p189==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t75, t85, t88, t98, t101, t126, t141, t148, t163, t216, t217, t219, i0.t119, i0.i1.u30.t7, i0...587
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 253 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 253 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 253 transition count 245
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 241 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 241 transition count 233
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 238 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 238 transition count 230
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 235 transition count 227
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 235 transition count 227
Applied a total of 86 rules in 10 ms. Remains 235 /277 variables (removed 42) and now considering 227/271 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 227 rows 235 cols
[2025-05-30 16:49:32] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:49:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 237 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 226 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:49:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 3/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 462/462 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved in 29089 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 226/226 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 40/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 227/462 variables, 235/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 226/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 7/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 2/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 3/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 89 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 462/462 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 226/226 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 59134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 226 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59134ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/277 places, 227/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59382 ms. Remains : 235/277 places, 227/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 227 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2424984079137435562.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17693034916910787560.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2424984079137435562.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17693034916910787560.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.56461e+17,5.42641,148564,2,51922,5,505067,6,0,1169,884843,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4735164114765990867.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4735164114765990867.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4735164114765990867.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4735164114765990867.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4735164114765990867.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1623836858595438900.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16448167989315404007.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1623836858595438900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16448167989315404007.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.56461e+17,0.212236,10716,1603,16,13897,215,495,17441,35,416,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((i12.u83.p266==0) + (((i0.i0.u2.p5==0) * AX((i1.u12.p38==0))) * (AX(((i15.i0.u54.p192==0)||(i20.i2.u97.p296==0))) * AX((i13.i2.u48.p1...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((i12.u83.p266==0) + (((i0.i0.u2.p5==0) * !(EX(!((i1.u12.p38==0))))) * (!(EX(!(((i15.i0.u54.p192==0)|...227
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t76, t86, t89, t102, t120, t127, t149, t164, t218, t219, t221, i0.t99, i0.i1.t101, i1.t171, i...610
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 97 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 97 transitions
Performed 97 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 97
Iterating post reduction 0 with 97 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 276 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 97 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 179 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 173 transition count 160
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 173 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 134 transition count 121
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 310 place count 115 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 115 transition count 102
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 115 transition count 96
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 109 transition count 96
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 78 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 407 place count 78 transition count 61
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 74 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 73 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 69 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 68 transition count 55
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 68 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 65 transition count 52
Applied a total of 428 rules in 12 ms. Remains 65 /277 variables (removed 212) and now considering 52/271 (removed 219) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 65 cols
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned [27, 38, 49, 54, 59, 64]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/277 places, 52/271 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 55 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 55 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 54 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 54 transition count 47
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 53 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 53 transition count 46
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 52 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 52 transition count 45
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 51 transition count 44
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 51 /59 variables (removed 8) and now considering 44/52 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 51 cols
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/277 places, 44/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 285 ms. Remains : 51/277 places, 44/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6271481175643169852.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15641146775113065519.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6271481175643169852.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15641146775113065519.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 18 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (3 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 97 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 97 transitions
Performed 97 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 97
Iterating post reduction 0 with 97 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 276 transition count 173
Reduce places removed 97 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 110 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 179 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 173 transition count 160
Performed 37 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 37 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 173 transition count 123
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 136 transition count 123
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 305 place count 118 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 118 transition count 105
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 118 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 111 transition count 98
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 79 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 79 transition count 62
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 76 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 75 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 71 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 70 transition count 57
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 70 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 424 place count 67 transition count 54
Applied a total of 424 rules in 14 ms. Remains 67 /277 variables (removed 210) and now considering 54/271 (removed 217) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 67 cols
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [29, 40, 51, 56, 61, 66]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/277 places, 54/271 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 57 transition count 50
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 57 transition count 50
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 56 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 56 transition count 49
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 55 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 55 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 54 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 54 transition count 47
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 53 transition count 46
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /61 variables (removed 8) and now considering 46/54 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 53 cols
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 53/277 places, 46/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 227 ms. Remains : 53/277 places, 46/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18049606675523380711.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17599405834290057478.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18049606675523380711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17599405834290057478.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,387072,0.016559,4280,2,281,5,1825,6,0,255,1889,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((AG((p86==1)) * (p115==1))) U EG(!(AG((p24==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !((p86==1)))) * (p115==1)))),!(!(E(TRUE U !((p24==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t6, t10, t28, t37, t44, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/rev...187
(forward)formula 0,1,0.083579,7736,1,0,103,20107,125,50,1581,19896,120
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 254 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 254 transition count 248
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 254 transition count 246
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 242 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 242 transition count 234
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 239 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 239 transition count 231
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 236 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 236 transition count 228
Applied a total of 84 rules in 11 ms. Remains 236 /277 variables (removed 41) and now considering 228/271 (removed 43) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 247 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 227 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 228/464 variables, 236/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 4/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/464 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 464/464 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 26555 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 52/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 228/464 variables, 236/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 227/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 6/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 5/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 3/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 464/464 variables, and 552 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 56585ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56586ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/277 places, 228/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56844 ms. Remains : 236/277 places, 228/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:52:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:52:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3962302136666415719.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11162660136819315779.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3962302136666415719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11162660136819315779.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.25578e+17,6.62885,156924,2,51722,5,519672,6,0,1174,966428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10341570167401224344.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10341570167401224344.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10341570167401224344.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10341570167401224344.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10341570167401224344.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3691626540402069735.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12061203159477558682.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3691626540402069735.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12061203159477558682.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.25578e+17,0.199612,12120,1903,18,16695,214,493,21764,36,407,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(((i16.u97.p290==0) * ((i19.i0.u90.p272==1) + (E((i1.i1.u21.p73==1) U ((i20.i0.u69.p239==1)&&(i20.i2.u100.p294==1))) * EG((i12.u50.p...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(((i16.u97.p290==0) * ((i19.i0.u90.p272==1) + (E((i1.i1.u21.p73==1) U ((i20.i0.u69.p239==1)&&(i20...213
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t76, t88, t91, t122, t129, t151, t166, t219, t220, t222, i0.u27.t7, i0.u27.t132, i1.t144, i1....599
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 259 transition count 253
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 259 transition count 253
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 259 transition count 251
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 249 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 249 transition count 241
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 247 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 247 transition count 239
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 245 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 245 transition count 237
Applied a total of 66 rules in 9 ms. Remains 245 /277 variables (removed 32) and now considering 237/271 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 245 cols
[2025-05-30 16:53:30] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:53:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 135 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 236 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:53:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 9/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 11/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 237/482 variables, 245/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 6/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/482 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 482/482 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved in 29274 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 236/236 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 52/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 7/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 237/482 variables, 245/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 236/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 10/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 2/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 1/575 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 482/482 variables, and 575 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 236/236 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 59305ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59306ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/277 places, 237/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59575 ms. Remains : 245/277 places, 237/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 237 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3934667757347501020.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13740088868731029750.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3934667757347501020.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13740088868731029750.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.57267e+17,14.7104,392684,2,90575,5,1.33015e+06,6,0,1219,2.4693e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12170778527107564201.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12170778527107564201.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12170778527107564201.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12170778527107564201.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12170778527107564201.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12191240344683473300.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15761009855358802139.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12191240344683473300.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15761009855358802139.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.57267e+17,0.277575,14836,1591,19,22460,241,547,31655,38,550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((AG(AF(((i7.u28.p87==0)||(i7.u65.p205==0)))) * AF((i14.i0.u56.p186==1))) * ((i6.u20.p63==0)&&(i5.i0.u12.p40==0)))) + (AG((((!(A((i7....601
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((i7.u28.p87==0)||(i7.u65.p205==0)))))))) * !(EG(!((i14.i0.u5...1663
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t80, t105, t108, t133, t155, t175, t229, t231, i0.t77, i0.i1.t79, i1.i0.t12, i1.i0.u35.t11, i...717
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 253 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 253 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 253 transition count 246
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 240 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 240 transition count 233
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 238 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 238 transition count 231
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 236 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 236 transition count 229
Applied a total of 83 rules in 10 ms. Remains 236 /277 variables (removed 41) and now considering 229/271 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 229 rows 236 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:30] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:55:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 214 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 228 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 12/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 7/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 229/465 variables, 236/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/465 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 465/465 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved in 29939 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 228/228 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 60/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 229/465 variables, 236/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 228/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 4/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 3/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 6/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 465/465 variables, and 561 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 228/228 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 59982ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59983ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/277 places, 229/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60207 ms. Remains : 236/277 places, 229/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:56:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 229 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:56:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9727135080376875909.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7608230441276328089.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9727135080376875909.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7608230441276328089.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.08392e+17,8.21646,231360,2,59238,5,783497,6,0,1175,1.43359e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17599052358248935735.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17599052358248935735.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17599052358248935735.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17599052358248935735.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17599052358248935735.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1592740357933729200.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13560376424613016602.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1592740357933729200.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13560376424613016602.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.08392e+17,0.168287,10916,1766,16,14649,203,541,16465,38,410,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(!(A(!(((i8.u31.p110==1)&&(i5.u76.p238==1))) U (i7.u29.p97==1)))) + ((!(E(EG(((((i6.u22.p94==1)&&(i5.u20.p71==1))&&(i5.u76.p237==1)) +...316
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!((i7.u29.p97==1)) U (!(!(((i8.u31.p110==1)&&(i5.u76.p238==1)))) * !((i7....780
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t75, t98, t101, t119, t126, t145, t152, t167, t220, t221, t223, i0.t88, i0.t85, i0.i2.t87, i1...605
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 255 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 255 transition count 249
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 255 transition count 248
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 244 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 244 transition count 237
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 241 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 241 transition count 234
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 238 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 238 transition count 231
Applied a total of 79 rules in 26 ms. Remains 238 /277 variables (removed 39) and now considering 231/271 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 231 rows 238 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:30] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:57:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 230 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 10/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 7/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 231/469 variables, 238/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 2/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 2/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/469 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 1/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 469/469 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 230/230 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 46/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 231/469 variables, 238/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 230/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 8/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 6/550 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 4/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 1/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 469/469 variables, and 555 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 230/230 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60046ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 230 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/277 places, 231/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60298 ms. Remains : 238/277 places, 231/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:58:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 231 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:58:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8283243894619280182.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14824248014416266226.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8283243894619280182.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14824248014416266226.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.43024e+17,4.36187,129364,2,52524,5,446069,6,0,1185,759782,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:59:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:59:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph948645039743482911.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph948645039743482911.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph948645039743482911.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph948645039743482911.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph948645039743482911.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:59:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:59:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:59:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:59:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:59:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2751489795829843965.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2456196720277723503.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2751489795829843965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2456196720277723503.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.43024e+17,0.216587,13304,1777,19,20498,263,515,24166,41,549,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((i11.u42.p163==0)&&(i7.u32.p108==1)) * ((AX((i21.i1.u51.p181==1)) + (i0.u7.p27==0)) * (((i20.i0.u92.p286==0)||(i16.i2.u100.p294==...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((i11.u42.p163==0)&&(i7.u32.p108==1)) * ((!(EX(!((i21.i1.u51.p181==1)))) + (i0.u...275
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t77, t87, t101, t104, t122, t131, t153, t168, t222, t223, t225, i0.t181, i0.t176, i0.u9.t1, i...609
(forward)formula 0,0,2.39829,117752,1,0,263286,263,2934,396728,191,549,584810
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 277/277 places, 271/271 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 258 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 258 transition count 252
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 258 transition count 250
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 250 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 250 transition count 242
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 248 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 248 transition count 240
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 246 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 246 transition count 238
Applied a total of 64 rules in 22 ms. Remains 246 /277 variables (removed 31) and now considering 238/271 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 246 cols
[2025-05-30 16:59:03] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:59:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 237 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:59:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/246 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 20/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 13/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 238/484 variables, 246/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 7/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 5/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 1/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 484/484 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 246/246 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 237/237 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/246 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 66/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 238/484 variables, 246/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 237/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 9/583 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 4/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/484 variables, 4/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60050ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60050ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 246/277 places, 238/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60347 ms. Remains : 246/277 places, 238/271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:00:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 238 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:00:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10242983870634299538.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12572102221477957108.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10242983870634299538.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12572102221477957108.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.64509e+17,16.0349,386664,2,87755,5,1.2099e+06,6,0,1224,2.49509e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14338108646042872543.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14338108646042872543.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14338108646042872543.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14338108646042872543.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14338108646042872543.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5567912316472164782.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:00:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability925768304205225055.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5567912316472164782.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability925768304205225055.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.64509e+17,0.434686,20288,3791,23,32479,211,514,46749,36,450,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((EX(EG((i5.u20.p64==1))) + (((A((i16.i0.u71.p214==1) U ((i5.u19.p60==1)&&(i8.u68.p208==1))) * (AF((i15.u63.p198==1)) + A((i21.i1.u1...612
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,(((EX(EG((i5.u20.p64==1))) + (((!((E(!(((i5.u19.p60==1)&&(i8.u68.p208==1))) U (!((i16.i0.u71.p214==1...939
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t77, t80, t90, t131, t138, t160, t175, t228, t229, t230, t232, i0.t79, i1.t104, i1.i1.t106, i...710
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17562521891971208471.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17562521891971208471.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17562521891971208471.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17562521891971208471.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17562521891971208471.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5870056608071939864.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:01:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15986209067746227885.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5870056608071939864.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15986209067746227885.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.65102e+18,1.41419,48644,5952,28,84563,327,604,145433,52,838,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EG(A((i18.i0.u98.p254==1) U (i1.u26.p68==1)))) * (!(A((i16.i3.u116.p295==1) U (i0.i1.u65.p176==1))) + ((i12.u51.p149==1) * AG(AX((...201
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!((E(!((i1.u26.p68==1)) U (!((i18.i0.u98.p254==1)) * !((i1.u26.p68==1)))) + EG(!(...675
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t92, t120, t147, t156, t261, t263, t265, i0.t89, i0.i2.t91, i1.t185, i1.t180, i1.u26.t9, i1.u...936
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-30 17:02:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:02:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:02:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:02:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9815880040730900102.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:02:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4782474817619512240.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9815880040730900102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4782474817619512240.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.65102e+18,147.537,3576512,39631,948,4.29547e+06,2678,655,3.65249e+07,265,20523,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EG(A((i1.i0.i0.i0.u37.p254==1) U (i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u19.p68==1)))) * (!(A((i1.u40.p295==1) U (i0.i0.u28.p176==1))) ...246
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!((E(!((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u19.p68==1)) U (!((i1.i0.i0.i0.u37.p254=...970
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.t89, i0.u29.t91, i0.i0.t92, i0.i0.i0.t104, i0.i0.i0.u27.t106, i0.i0.i0.i0.u26.t109, i0.i0....2383
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:29:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 81 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:29:48] [INFO ] Transformed 277 places.
[2025-05-30 17:29:48] [INFO ] Transformed 271 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-30 17:29:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2215507821227618849.gal : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 17:29:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6436634160914309452.ctl : 21 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2215507821227618849.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6436634160914309452.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.65102e+18,8.13484,215956,2,101474,5,775168,6,0,1381,1.24828e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EG(A((p254==1) U (p68==1)))) * (!(A((p295==1) U (p176==1))) + ((p149==1) * AG(AX(((p245==1)&&(p296==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!((E(!((p68==1)) U (!((p254==1)) * !((p68==1)))) + EG(!((p68==1)))))))))),!((p176...510
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t31, t...531

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-03b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-03b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400482"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-03b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-03b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;