Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729400481.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-03b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400481
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 428K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748623209859

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-03b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Transformed 298 places.
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Transformed 296 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 298 places and 296 transitions and 692 arcs in 170 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 96 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 296/296 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 276 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 276 transition count 274
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 276 transition count 270
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 272 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 272 transition count 266
Applied a total of 56 rules in 67 ms. Remains 272 /298 variables (removed 26) and now considering 266/296 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 266 rows 272 cols
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 19 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 279 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 228 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 537 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 265 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:40:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 143 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 152 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 134 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 20/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 13/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 8/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 3/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 6/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 266/538 variables, 272/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 2/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 538/538 variables, and 369 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 265/265 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 75/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 6/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 6/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 13/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 2/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 266/538 variables, 272/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 265/663 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 8/671 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 4/675 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 538/538 variables, and 675 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 265/265 constraints, Known Traps: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60105ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 265 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60116ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 272/298 places, 266/296 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60738 ms. Remains : 272/298 places, 266/296 transitions.
Support contains 96 out of 272 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
Support contains 91 out of 272 places (down from 96) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (249 resets) in 2050 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 7/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (24 resets) in 204 ms. (195 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (25 resets) in 132 ms. (300 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (26 resets) in 169 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (26 resets) in 148 ms. (268 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (25 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (26 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (37 resets) in 80 ms. (493 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
[2025-05-30 16:41:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 173/184 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 70/254 variables, 9/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 18/272 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 266/538 variables, 272/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/538 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 538/538 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 401 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 173/184 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 70/254 variables, 9/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 18/272 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 5/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 266/538 variables, 272/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 6/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/538 variables, 5/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 2/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/538 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 538/538 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 4045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 4452ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 604 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 99 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 99 transitions
Performed 99 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 99
Iterating post reduction 0 with 99 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 272 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 99 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 173 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 167 transition count 154
Performed 35 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 35 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 167 transition count 119
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 132 transition count 119
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 116 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 116 transition count 103
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 116 transition count 97
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 110 transition count 97
Performed 37 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 4 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 73 transition count 56
Free-agglomeration rule applied 12 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 73 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 429 place count 61 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 60 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 4 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 48 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 35 transition count 30
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 468 place count 35 transition count 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 490 place count 24 transition count 19
Applied a total of 490 rules in 41 ms. Remains 24 /272 variables (removed 248) and now considering 19/266 (removed 247) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 41 ms. Remains : 24/272 places, 19/266 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 46 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
Computed a total of 81 stabilizing places and 81 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 95 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 95 transitions
Performed 95 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 95
Iterating post reduction 0 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 271 transition count 170
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 176 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 172 transition count 161
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 172 transition count 127
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 138 transition count 127
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 287 place count 122 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 122 transition count 111
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 122 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 117 transition count 106
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 385 place count 81 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 81 transition count 66
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 77 transition count 62
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 77 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 76 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 72 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 71 transition count 60
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 71 transition count 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 68 transition count 57
Applied a total of 411 rules in 30 ms. Remains 68 /272 variables (removed 204) and now considering 57/266 (removed 209) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 68 cols
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [30, 41, 52, 57, 61, 67]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/272 places, 57/266 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 58 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 58 transition count 53
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 57 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 57 transition count 52
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 56 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 56 transition count 51
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 55 transition count 50
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 55 transition count 50
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 54 transition count 49
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 54 /62 variables (removed 8) and now considering 49/57 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 54 cols
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 54/272 places, 49/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 178 ms. Remains : 54/272 places, 49/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 49 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14019939191773001878.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8975963529621926103.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14019939191773001878.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8975963529621926103.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,666144,0.019996,4132,2,229,5,1473,6,0,265,1563,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(A((((p137==0)||(p70==1)) * EF((p180!=1))) U AG((p112==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p112==1))))) U (!((((p137==0)||(p70==1)) * E(TRUE U (p180!=1)))) * !(!(E(TRUE ...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t9, t47, t48, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/rever...185
(forward)formula 0,1,0.267996,16024,1,0,241,67511,127,124,1635,85123,271
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 91 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 91 transitions
Performed 91 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 91
Iterating post reduction 0 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 271 transition count 174
Reduce places removed 91 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 180 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 174 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 171 transition count 158
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 171 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 137 transition count 124
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 289 place count 123 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 123 transition count 110
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 303 place count 123 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 117 transition count 104
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 83 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 83 transition count 66
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 79 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 396 place count 78 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 74 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 73 transition count 60
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 73 transition count 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 408 place count 70 transition count 57
Applied a total of 408 rules in 30 ms. Remains 70 /272 variables (removed 202) and now considering 57/266 (removed 209) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 70 cols
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [41, 59, 63, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/272 places, 57/266 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 64 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 64 transition count 55
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 61 transition count 52
Applied a total of 10 rules in 4 ms. Remains 61 /66 variables (removed 5) and now considering 52/57 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 61 cols
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 260 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 61/272 places, 52/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 349 ms. Remains : 61/272 places, 52/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17789464924995149595.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11542972605530434064.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17789464924995149595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11542972605530434064.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,820818,0.018592,4476,2,668,5,3278,6,0,290,3114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AF(((p124==1)&&((p254==0)||((p11==0)&&(p213==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EG(!(((p124==1)&&((p254==0)||((p11==0)&&(p213==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t9, t10, t11, t37, t42, t46, t48, t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step ena...208
(forward)formula 0,1,1.33656,59612,1,0,379,317171,131,170,1731,380987,406
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 249 transition count 243
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 249 transition count 241
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 240 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 240 transition count 232
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 237 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 237 transition count 229
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 234 transition count 226
Applied a total of 78 rules in 19 ms. Remains 234 /272 variables (removed 38) and now considering 226/266 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-30 16:41:20] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 270 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:41:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 241 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 515 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:41:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 9/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 11/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 25467 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 43/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 225/524 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 5/529 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 7/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 539 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 55496ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55497ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/272 places, 226/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56032 ms. Remains : 234/272 places, 226/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 226 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7253960865830818667.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16429681984407222905.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7253960865830818667.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16429681984407222905.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23718e+17,6.61729,176336,2,55765,5,597774,6,0,1164,1.0751e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6427587699955480415.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6427587699955480415.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6427587699955480415.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6427587699955480415.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6427587699955480415.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:42:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:42:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:42:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:42:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 98 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:42:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7411818346769036463.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11672039548306737179.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7411818346769036463.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11672039548306737179.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.23718e+17,0.335405,16468,1965,21,26801,262,500,34266,36,655,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((EX((((i18.i1.u83.p259==0)||(i10.i0.u2.p6==1))||((i1.u8.p25==0)&&(i5.u14.p42==1)))) + ((i1.u78.p245==0)&&(i6.u25.p82==1)))) * EF(AX((...193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * EX((EX((((i18.i1.u83.p259==0)||(i10.i0.u2.p6==1))||((i1.u8.p25==0)&&(i5.u14.p42==1)))) + ((i1.u78...251
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t73, t76, t86, t89, t120, t127, t149, t164, t217, t218, t220, i1.u7.t0, i1.u7.t173, i2.u11.t1...606
(forward)formula 0,1,1.73357,79700,1,0,195041,262,2933,236887,163,755,532559
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 250 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 250 transition count 244
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 250 transition count 242
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 243 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 243 transition count 235
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 240 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 240 transition count 232
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 238 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 238 transition count 230
Applied a total of 70 rules in 17 ms. Remains 238 /272 variables (removed 34) and now considering 230/266 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 230 rows 238 cols
[2025-05-30 16:42:49] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 441 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:42:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 243 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 689 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 229 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:42:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 108 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 19/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 230/468 variables, 238/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 4/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/468 variables, 3/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/468 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 468/468 variables, and 311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 229/229 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 51/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 230/468 variables, 238/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 229/544 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 3/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 133 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 5/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 2/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/468 variables, 1/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 468/468 variables, and 555 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 229/229 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60104ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 229 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60107ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/272 places, 230/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60814 ms. Remains : 238/272 places, 230/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:43:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:43:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14298970750873021288.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:43:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10993138161425290445.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14298970750873021288.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10993138161425290445.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.31724e+17,5.3917,154700,2,49181,5,525729,6,0,1184,918903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:44:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:44:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5825925968022407710.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5825925968022407710.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5825925968022407710.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5825925968022407710.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5825925968022407710.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:44:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:44:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:44:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:44:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:44:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2547038162762938393.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13579943221985155858.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2547038162762938393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13579943221985155858.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.31724e+17,0.278369,15884,2025,14,25641,192,480,32083,28,419,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX((i9.u35.p122==0)) * EF(AX(EG((i12.u52.p175==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !((i9.u35.p122==0)))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EG((i12.u52.p175=...175
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t76, t88, t91, t124, t131, t146, t153, t168, t221, t222, t224, i0.t104, i0.t101, i0.i2.t103, ...608
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 248 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 248 transition count 242
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 248 transition count 240
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 240 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 240 transition count 232
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 237 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 237 transition count 229
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 234 transition count 226
Applied a total of 78 rules in 22 ms. Remains 234 /272 variables (removed 38) and now considering 226/266 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-30 16:44:50] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:44:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 290 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:44:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 53 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 10/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 8/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 22490 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 40/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 6/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 4/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 544 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 52540ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52541ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/272 places, 226/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52854 ms. Remains : 234/272 places, 226/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 226 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8580193814491795778.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:45:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17918780720945974400.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8580193814491795778.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17918780720945974400.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.35469e+17,5.22317,148628,2,51892,5,505004,6,0,1164,884692,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7861638876916512536.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7861638876916512536.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7861638876916512536.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7861638876916512536.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7861638876916512536.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2076787673299588338.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2258824054792909353.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2076787673299588338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2258824054792909353.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.35469e+17,0.127107,9548,1625,21,11422,216,492,13357,36,447,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((AX(EX((i16.i1.u68.p221==0))) + (i2.u11.p28==1))) * (EG((i5.u25.p81==0)) + EG((((AX(((i0.i0.u4.p10==0)&&(i0.i1.u21.p76==1))) * (i16.i...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((i2.u11.p28==1)))) * !(EX((i16.i1.u68.p221==0))))] = FALSE * [((Init * !(EG((((!(EX(!...303
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t73, t76, t86, t89, t99, t102, t120, t127, t149, t164, t217, t218, t220, i0.t142, i0.i1.u20.t...599
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 249 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 249 transition count 243
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 249 transition count 241
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 241 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 241 transition count 233
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 239 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 239 transition count 231
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 237 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 237 transition count 229
Applied a total of 72 rules in 19 ms. Remains 237 /272 variables (removed 35) and now considering 229/266 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 229 rows 237 cols
[2025-05-30 16:46:43] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:46:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 294 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 228 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:46:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 18/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 5/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 14/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 229/466 variables, 237/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 4/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/466 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 466/466 variables, and 307 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 228/228 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 48/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 229/466 variables, 237/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 228/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 3/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 7/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 466/466 variables, and 547 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 228/228 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60081ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60082ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/272 places, 229/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60397 ms. Remains : 237/272 places, 229/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 229 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18425210682817494223.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:47:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9601786192456937912.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18425210682817494223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9601786192456937912.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.79995e+17,8.63444,245872,2,61215,5,837084,6,0,1179,1.532e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12894728004986957418.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12894728004986957418.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12894728004986957418.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12894728004986957418.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12894728004986957418.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:48:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:48:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:48:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:48:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3558067612875053274.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4898974842859407999.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3558067612875053274.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4898974842859407999.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.79995e+17,0.367095,18464,1893,14,29293,187,475,43804,28,415,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EX(((((i4.u13.p40==0)||(i3.i1.u11.p35==1))&&(((i6.u23.p75==1)||(i15.i1.u77.p241==0))||((i6.u75.p236==1)||((i10.i2.u42.p148==1)&&((i10...295
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((((i4.u13.p40==0)||(i3.i1.u11.p35==1))&&(((i6.u23.p75==1)||(i15.i1.u77.p241==0...376
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, t88, t119, t126, t141, t148, t167, t220, t221, t223, i0.t87, i1.u30.t6, i1.u30.t129, i2....614
(forward)formula 0,0,6.33394,257952,1,0,591893,187,3343,917380,138,454,1057813
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 98 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 98 transitions
Performed 98 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 98
Iterating post reduction 0 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 271 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 98 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 173 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 167 transition count 154
Performed 33 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 33 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 167 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 134 transition count 121
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 118 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 118 transition count 105
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 313 place count 118 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 112 transition count 99
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 78 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 78 transition count 61
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 75 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 74 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 70 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 69 transition count 56
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 69 transition count 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 66 transition count 53
Applied a total of 416 rules in 20 ms. Remains 66 /272 variables (removed 206) and now considering 53/266 (removed 213) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 66 cols
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned [26, 37, 54, 58, 65]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/272 places, 53/266 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 58 transition count 50
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 58 transition count 50
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 57 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 57 transition count 49
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 56 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 56 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 55 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 55 transition count 47
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 54 transition count 46
Applied a total of 14 rules in 5 ms. Remains 54 /61 variables (removed 7) and now considering 46/53 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 54 cols
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 54/272 places, 46/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 227 ms. Remains : 54/272 places, 46/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5063785774550889940.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5605816961372903732.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5063785774550889940.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5605816961372903732.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 10865 steps (723 resets) in 37 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 250 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 250 transition count 244
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 250 transition count 242
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 241 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 241 transition count 233
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 239 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 239 transition count 231
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 237 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 237 transition count 229
Applied a total of 72 rules in 21 ms. Remains 237 /272 variables (removed 35) and now considering 229/266 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 229 rows 237 cols
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 242 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 228 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:48:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 10/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 9/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 229/466 variables, 237/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/466 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 466/466 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved in 28073 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 228/228 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 44/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 229/466 variables, 237/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 228/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 4/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 57 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 4/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 4/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 3/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 466/466 variables, and 548 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 228/228 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 58101ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 228 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58101ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/272 places, 229/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58367 ms. Remains : 237/272 places, 229/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 229 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17330070597673121895.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10522002012027564463.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17330070597673121895.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10522002012027564463.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.79809e+17,15.024,401728,2,82399,5,1.33333e+06,6,0,1179,2.56825e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6991585226398816783.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6991585226398816783.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6991585226398816783.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6991585226398816783.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6991585226398816783.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11944004169211959488.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:49:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14473268334544780722.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11944004169211959488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14473268334544780722.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.79809e+17,0.483644,23460,2402,23,41117,267,507,55144,36,802,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(EG((i8.i0.u26.p82==0))) * AX(E(!(((i7.u33.p109==0)||(i12.i0.u65.p211==0))) U EG((i3.u14.p55==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(EG((i8.i0.u26.p82==0))) * !(EX(!(E(!(((i7.u33.p109==0)||(i12.i0.u65.p211==0))) U EG((i3.u14.p55...176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t77, t87, t90, t103, t121, t128, t150, t167, t219, t220, t221, t223, i0.t100, i0.i2.t102, i1....657
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 248 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 248 transition count 242
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 248 transition count 240
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 240 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 240 transition count 232
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 237 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 237 transition count 229
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 234 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 234 transition count 226
Applied a total of 78 rules in 14 ms. Remains 234 /272 variables (removed 38) and now considering 226/266 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 266 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:50:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 8/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 9/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 8/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 5/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 27773 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/234 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 54/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 3/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 226/460 variables, 234/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 225/540 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 6/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 549 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 57829ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57829ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/272 places, 226/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58110 ms. Remains : 234/272 places, 226/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 226 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16806078011417974544.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13330890235577102300.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16806078011417974544.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13330890235577102300.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.60529e+17,3.05768,92268,2,38855,5,321018,6,0,1164,517421,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12643722895241150249.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12643722895241150249.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12643722895241150249.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12643722895241150249.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12643722895241150249.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9228785605146644656.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:51:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17281035706917636656.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9228785605146644656.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17281035706917636656.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.60529e+17,0.078908,7200,958,14,6452,175,510,6379,29,337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AF(EG(EF((i3.u15.p43==1)))) * EF((((i0.u45.p159==0)&&(i12.i1.u66.p214==1))&&((i11.i1.u82.p251==1)||(i16.i2.u95.p284==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(E(TRUE U (i3.u15.p43==1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (((i0.u45.p159==0)&&(i12.i1...229
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, t88, t102, t120, t127, t142, t149, t164, t217, t218, t220, i1.i0.u8.t0, i1.i0.u8.t173, i...591
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 251 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 251 transition count 245
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 251 transition count 244
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 247 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 247 transition count 240
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 246 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 246 transition count 239
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 245 transition count 238
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 245 transition count 238
Applied a total of 55 rules in 12 ms. Remains 245 /272 variables (removed 27) and now considering 238/266 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 245 cols
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 254 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 237 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:52:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 19/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 238/483 variables, 245/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 483/483 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 237/237 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 49/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 8/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 4/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 4/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 238/483 variables, 245/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 237/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 4/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 1/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/483 variables, 4/578 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 483/483 variables, and 578 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 237/237 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60034ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 237 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60035ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/272 places, 238/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60301 ms. Remains : 245/272 places, 238/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:53:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 238 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:53:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13307204062010939630.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7074945160898963809.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13307204062010939630.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7074945160898963809.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.44799e+17,12.2699,327604,2,79010,5,1.0592e+06,6,0,1220,2.0815e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9716954577701460863.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9716954577701460863.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9716954577701460863.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9716954577701460863.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9716954577701460863.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9851618326170108728.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6885655495456180421.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9851618326170108728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6885655495456180421.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.44799e+17,0.606893,26188,3287,22,45473,285,555,59081,47,690,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A(A((((!((i7.u28.p93==0)||(i4.u14.p41==1)))||(i1.i0.u5.p12!=0))||(i18.u77.p231!=1)) U (EG(((i13.u51.p179==0)||(i8.u29.p97==1))) * EG(((...400
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(TRUE U EX(((i1.i1.u42.p143==0)||(i17.i0.u72.p219==1)))) + !(E((i10.i2.u34.p132==1) U (i3.u...1177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t87, t90, t126, t133, t154, t161, t176, t228, t229, t230, t232, i0.t74, i0.i1.t76, i1.t104, i...674
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 255 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 255 transition count 249
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 255 transition count 247
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 251 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 251 transition count 243
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 250 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 250 transition count 242
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 249 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 249 transition count 241
Applied a total of 48 rules in 17 ms. Remains 249 /272 variables (removed 23) and now considering 241/266 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 249 cols
[2025-05-30 16:54:18] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:54:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 254 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/249 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 55 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 15/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 15/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 3/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 241/490 variables, 249/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 6/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30107ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30108ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 249/272 places, 241/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30379 ms. Remains : 249/272 places, 241/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18387931902497601042.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:54:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18363641015042253754.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18387931902497601042.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18363641015042253754.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.32666e+17,16.0153,433988,2,110630,5,1.39278e+06,6,0,1239,2.78814e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14598914366218967632.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14598914366218967632.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14598914366218967632.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14598914366218967632.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14598914366218967632.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9486619590614059936.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6287711504532142141.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9486619590614059936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6287711504532142141.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.32666e+17,0.638092,22140,3437,25,37404,264,560,52774,36,678,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AX(((E(((i2.u11.p38==0)||(i13.i1.u69.p202==1)) U (i9.u42.p131==1)) * EX(((i5.i1.u23.p67==0)||(i10.u44.p135==1)))) * (((i11.u50.p153=...329
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!((EX(((i1.u8.p17==0)||(i14.i1.u74.p215==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((i0.i1.u89.p251==0)))...1075
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t79, t89, t92, t130, t137, t163, t232, t233, t234, t235, i0.t104, i0.i1.t106, i1.u8.t0, i1.u8...714
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 95 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 95 transitions
Performed 95 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 95
Iterating post reduction 0 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 271 transition count 170
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 176 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 170 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 169 transition count 156
Performed 35 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 35 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 169 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 134 transition count 121
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 298 place count 117 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 117 transition count 104
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 117 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 112 transition count 99
Performed 33 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 79 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 79 transition count 62
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 75 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 74 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 70 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 69 transition count 56
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 69 transition count 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 66 transition count 53
Applied a total of 416 rules in 21 ms. Remains 66 /272 variables (removed 206) and now considering 53/266 (removed 213) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 66 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:48] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [26, 37, 50, 55, 59, 65]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/272 places, 53/266 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 56 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 56 transition count 49
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 55 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 55 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 54 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 54 transition count 47
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 53 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 53 transition count 46
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 52 transition count 45
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 52 /60 variables (removed 8) and now considering 45/53 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 52 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:48] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 52/272 places, 45/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 208 ms. Remains : 52/272 places, 45/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15308033290249716024.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17140768443777386747.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15308033290249716024.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17140768443777386747.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,221184,0.012416,4132,2,171,5,1111,6,0,250,1107,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG(!(A(((p205==0)||(p90==1)) U (p229==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!((p229==1)) U (!(((p205==0)||(p90==1))) * !((p229==1)))) + E...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t44, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,1,0.313592,18516,1,0,324,89289,122,161,1499,92868,479
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 253 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 253 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 253 transition count 246
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 246 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 246 transition count 239
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 244 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 244 transition count 237
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 242 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 242 transition count 235
Applied a total of 61 rules in 20 ms. Remains 242 /272 variables (removed 30) and now considering 235/266 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 235 rows 242 cols
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 290 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 234 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:55:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 15/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 11/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 9/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 235/477 variables, 242/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 9/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 2/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/477 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 477/477 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved in 29498 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 234/234 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 66/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 235/477 variables, 242/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 234/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 3/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 1/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 6/575 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 477/477 variables, and 575 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 234/234 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 59540ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59545ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 242/272 places, 235/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59856 ms. Remains : 242/272 places, 235/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 235 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6145936673035067603.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:56:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7027127885107117641.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6145936673035067603.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7027127885107117641.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.11911e+17,7.76375,227160,2,60754,5,783929,6,0,1205,1.39704e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7281364993640052985.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7281364993640052985.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7281364993640052985.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7281364993640052985.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7281364993640052985.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12068935756229645079.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4034533038430398484.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12068935756229645079.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4034533038430398484.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.11911e+17,0.424797,18980,2042,17,31168,259,531,43806,42,617,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF((i20.i1.u93.p292==1)) * EG((E(((i13.u50.p175==0)||(i9.i1.u35.p129==1)) U ((i10.i1.u41.p147==0)||(i1.u80.p246==1))) + ((i9.i2.u36....424
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U (i20.i1.u93.p292==1)) * EG((E(((i13.u50.p175==0)||(i9.i1.u35.p129==1)) U ((i10.i1.u41.p1...499
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t74, t77, t89, t92, t105, t127, t134, t156, t171, t226, t227, i0.t149, i0.i1.u19.t4, i0.i1.u1...647
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 95 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 95 transitions
Performed 95 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 95
Iterating post reduction 0 with 95 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 271 transition count 170
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 108 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 176 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 170 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 169 transition count 156
Performed 36 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 36 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 169 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 133 transition count 120
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 299 place count 117 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 117 transition count 104
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 117 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 12 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 112 transition count 99
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 78 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 78 transition count 61
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 74 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 73 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 69 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 68 transition count 55
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 412 place count 68 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 65 transition count 52
Applied a total of 418 rules in 35 ms. Remains 65 /272 variables (removed 207) and now considering 52/266 (removed 214) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 65 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [27, 38, 49, 54, 58, 64]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/272 places, 52/266 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 55 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 55 transition count 48
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 54 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 54 transition count 47
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 53 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 53 transition count 46
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 52 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 52 transition count 45
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 51 transition count 44
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 51 /59 variables (removed 8) and now considering 44/52 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 51 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 51/272 places, 44/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 205 ms. Remains : 51/272 places, 44/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 115 steps (4 resets) in 4 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-03b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9975034461732418119.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12261433166834794509.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9975034461732418119.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12261433166834794509.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 266/266 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 248 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 248 transition count 242
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 248 transition count 240
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 239 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 239 transition count 231
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 236 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 236 transition count 228
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 233 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 233 transition count 225
Applied a total of 80 rules in 14 ms. Remains 233 /272 variables (removed 39) and now considering 225/266 (removed 41) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 225 rows 233 cols
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 224 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:57:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/233 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 47/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 225/458 variables, 233/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 224/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 541 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 233/233 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 224/224 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 224 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60047ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 233/272 places, 225/266 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60285 ms. Remains : 233/272 places, 225/266 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:58:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 225 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:58:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8895627820809803650.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:58:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17628773941024016683.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8895627820809803650.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17628773941024016683.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.14476e+17,3.34395,90276,2,38479,5,316411,6,0,1159,509810,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph566502503823864767.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph566502503823864767.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph566502503823864767.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph566502503823864767.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph566502503823864767.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8401169458141165435.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12814711612164663365.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8401169458141165435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12814711612164663365.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.14476e+17,0.090119,7740,1068,13,7563,189,480,7918,28,356,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(EG(EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(EX(TRUE))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, t88, t119, t126, t148, t163, t216, t217, t219, i0.t75, i0.t72, i0.i2.t74, i1.t137, i1.u2...586
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3422581995205617748.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3422581995205617748.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3422581995205617748.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3422581995205617748.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3422581995205617748.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10810137426681038698.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:59:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3821206321241761339.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10810137426681038698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3821206321241761339.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69968e+18,2.30846,82620,10404,38,157358,392,640,242081,52,1308,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX((i9.i0.u44.p122==0)) * EF(AX(EG((i13.i1.u66.p175==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !((i9.i0.u44.p122==0)))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EG((i13.i1.u66...181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t87, t103, t106, t153, t182, t256, t258, t259, t260, i0.i1.t105, i1.u35.t12, i1.u35.t156, i2....892
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4025426328945298583.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:26:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8121240126065966787.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4025426328945298583.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8121240126065966787.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69968e+18,142.758,3333684,46069,895,3.75808e+06,2009,634,3.47262e+07,267,11048,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-03b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-03b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729400481"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-03b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-03b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;