Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729300466.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-02b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729300466
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 456K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 112K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748622000262

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-02b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Transformed 206 places.
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Transformed 204 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 206 places and 204 transitions and 478 arcs in 161 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 97 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 204/204 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 197 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 197 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 197 transition count 194
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 195 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 195 transition count 192
Applied a total of 23 rules in 40 ms. Remains 195 /206 variables (removed 11) and now considering 192/204 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 195 cols
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 233 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:20:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 422 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 191 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:20:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/195 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 262 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 15/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 6/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 192/387 variables, 195/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 3/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 261 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 26206 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 195/195 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/195 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 50/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 4/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 192/387 variables, 195/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 191/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 6/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 14/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 482 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 195/195 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 56275ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56289ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 195/206 places, 192/204 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56779 ms. Remains : 195/206 places, 192/204 transitions.
Support contains 97 out of 195 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-30 16:20:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 192 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (350 resets) in 1257 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 12/84 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (45 resets) in 229 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (43 resets) in 99 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (43 resets) in 109 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (43 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (42 resets) in 80 ms. (493 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (65 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (46 resets) in 78 ms. (506 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (44 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (43 resets) in 202 ms. (197 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (56 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2025-05-30 16:20:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp77 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 154/180 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/184 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 11/195 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 192/387 variables, 195/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 211 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 9 unsolved in 347 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 195/195 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 140/157 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 26/183 variables, 4/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 12/195 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 192/387 variables, 195/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 8/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved in 1668 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 195/195 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/12 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2029ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 8 unsolved
Fused 8 Parikh solutions to 5 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 905 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 195 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 65 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 65 transitions
Performed 65 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 65
Iterating post reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 195 transition count 127
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 130 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 128 transition count 117
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 126 transition count 117
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 126 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 104 transition count 95
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 200 place count 92 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 92 transition count 83
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 92 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 88 transition count 79
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 67 transition count 58
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 66 transition count 58
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 66 transition count 56
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 65 transition count 55
Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 276 place count 65 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 57 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 56 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 54 transition count 46
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 54 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 52 transition count 44
Applied a total of 291 rules in 43 ms. Remains 52 /195 variables (removed 143) and now considering 44/192 (removed 148) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 43 ms. Remains : 52/195 places, 44/192 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 631 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 69 ms. (571 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 82 ms. (481 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 52 cols
[2025-05-30 16:21:02] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 6/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/17 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 16/33 variables, 17/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 19/52 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 14/66 variables, 3/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 9/75 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 20/96 variables, 26/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 8/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/96 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 96/96 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 56 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 6/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/17 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 16/33 variables, 17/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 19/52 variables, 9/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp68 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 52/96 variables, and 41 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 61 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/2 constraints, State Equation: 26/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 126ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 16:21:03] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-30 16:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 16:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 192 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 195 places (down from 85) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 57 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 173 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 173 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 173 transition count 168
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 164 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 164 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 163 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 163 transition count 158
Applied a total of 66 rules in 14 ms. Remains 163 /195 variables (removed 32) and now considering 158/192 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 163 cols
[2025-05-30 16:21:03] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:21:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:21:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 19/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 4/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 158/321 variables, 163/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/321 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 321/321 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 10968 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 163/163 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 26/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 158/321 variables, 163/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 157/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 2/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 3/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 4/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 321/321 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 163/163 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 40992ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40993ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 163/195 places, 158/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41186 ms. Remains : 163/195 places, 158/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10342784717582742077.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:21:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11814130477600720222.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10342784717582742077.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11814130477600720222.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.39587e+12,0.332113,17676,2,9421,5,55521,6,0,812,72001,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((p47==1)) + E((p5==1) U EF(((EX((p120==1)) * (p100==1)) * (p14==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(E((p5==1) U E(TRUE U ((EX((p120==1)) * (p100==1)) * (p14==1))))))) * !((p47==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t13, t21, t32, t38, t49, t53, t55, t56, t66, t68, t69, t80, t83, t87, t90, t9...311
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9920150748504807436.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9920150748504807436.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9920150748504807436.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9920150748504807436.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9920150748504807436.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 37 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10502244690515006415.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17465171990961134580.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10502244690515006415.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17465171990961134580.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.39587e+12,0.057233,6204,650,23,4583,220,413,5111,40,531,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((i2.u11.p47==1)) + E((i9.i0.u1.p5==1) U EF(((EX((i9.i1.u33.p120==1)) * (i7.u26.p100==1)) * (i0.u5.p14==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(E((i9.i0.u1.p5==1) U E(TRUE U ((EX((i9.i1.u33.p120==1)) * (i7.u26.p100==1)) * (i0.u5.p14==1))))))...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t56, t66, t69, t94, t109, t151, t152, t153, i0.u6.t0, i0.u6.t118, i1.u8.t1, i1.u8.t112, i2.t1...443
(forward)formula 0,1,2.50831,114492,1,0,226491,220,2247,409098,186,531,401231
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 173 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 173 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 173 transition count 167
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 165 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 165 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 164 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 164 transition count 158
Applied a total of 65 rules in 13 ms. Remains 164 /195 variables (removed 31) and now considering 158/192 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 164 cols
[2025-05-30 16:22:17] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:22:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 313 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:22:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 13/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 158/322 variables, 164/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 9924 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 18/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 5/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 158/322 variables, 164/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 157/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 4/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 373 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 39952ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39954ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/195 places, 158/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40280 ms. Remains : 164/195 places, 158/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:22:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:22:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1263511896366124619.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:22:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8923223989491300056.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1263511896366124619.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8923223989491300056.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.05119e+12,0.304825,18432,2,10047,5,57437,6,0,816,76550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((E(((p194==1)&&(p202==1)) U AG(!(EX((p127==1))))) * (p102==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(((p194==1)&&(p202==1)) U !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX((p127==1))))))) * (p102==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t14, t22, t33, t39, t50, t54, t56, t57, t67, t69, t72, t80, t82, t85, t89, t9...316
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7023374530816153228.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7023374530816153228.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7023374530816153228.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7023374530816153228.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7023374530816153228.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability706586403418927297.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1222036598083104206.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability706586403418927297.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1222036598083104206.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.05119e+12,0.054107,6220,672,19,4501,157,392,4842,31,309,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((E(((i14.i0.u62.p194==1)&&(i13.i2.u69.p202==1)) U AG(!(EX((i13.i1.u37.p127==1))))) * (i6.u28.p102==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(((i14.i0.u62.p194==1)&&(i13.i2.u69.p202==1)) U !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX((i13.i1.u37.p127==1))))))) * (i...181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t57, t67, t89, t96, t111, t151, t152, t153, i0.u15.t3, i0.u15.t99, i1.u6.t0, i1.u6.t120, i2.i...454
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,8.64735,333528,1,0,871868,157,2419,655325,147,383,837817
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 174 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 174 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 174 transition count 168
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 166 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 166 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 165 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 165 transition count 159
Applied a total of 63 rules in 16 ms. Remains 165 /195 variables (removed 30) and now considering 159/192 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 165 cols
[2025-05-30 16:23:36] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:23:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:23:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 16/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 159/324 variables, 165/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 3/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 3/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 324/324 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 11189 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 165/165 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 24/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 159/324 variables, 165/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 158/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 4/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 3/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 1/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 6/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 324/324 variables, and 379 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 165/165 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 41230ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41231ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 165/195 places, 159/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41421 ms. Remains : 165/195 places, 159/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:24:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:24:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:24:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:24:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:24:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:24:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16620220388448727050.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:24:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14127877462911782841.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16620220388448727050.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14127877462911782841.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.4415e+12,0.536427,26556,2,13337,5,87748,6,0,821,127153,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(AF((p63==1)) U A((p167==1) U (p5==1)))) * AF((EX(AF((p178==0))) + AF((((p130==1)&&(p204==1))&&(p169==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((p5==1)) U (!((p167==1)) * !((p5==1)))) + EG(!((p5==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!((E(!((p5==1)) ...415
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t5, t14, t22, t34, t37, t40, t51, t55, t57, t58, t68, t70, t71, t82, t85, t91, t9...322
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph993771678240881058.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph993771678240881058.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph993771678240881058.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph993771678240881058.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph993771678240881058.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16978642037664117287.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:24:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16180944287522205273.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16978642037664117287.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16180944287522205273.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.4415e+12,0.110702,8268,1165,24,8859,180,402,11676,36,461,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(AF((i4.u19.p63==1)) U A((i15.i1.u49.p167==1) U (i5.i0.u2.p5==1)))) * AF((EX(AF((i13.i0.u58.p178==0))) + AF((((i2.u39.p130==1)&&(i15....198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((i5.i0.u2.p5==1)) U (!((i15.i1.u49.p167==1)) * !((i5.i0.u2.p5==1)))) + EG(!((i5.i0.u2.p...576
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t58, t71, t97, t112, t151, t152, t153, i0.u5.t0, i0.u5.t121, i1.u9.t1, i1.u9.t115, i2.t108, i...468
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 177 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 177 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 177 transition count 171
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 173 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 173 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 172 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 172 transition count 166
Applied a total of 49 rules in 17 ms. Remains 172 /195 variables (removed 23) and now considering 166/192 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 172 cols
[2025-05-30 16:25:18] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:25:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 165 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:25:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 18/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 5/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 166/338 variables, 172/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/338 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 338/338 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 12287 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 27/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 166/338 variables, 172/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 165/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 6/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 3/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 2/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 7/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 2/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 338/338 variables, and 402 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 42314ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42315ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 172/195 places, 166/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42505 ms. Remains : 172/195 places, 166/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:26:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 166 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:26:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8563450398768372859.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:26:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16590657320469369603.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8563450398768372859.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16590657320469369603.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.52426e+12,1.77231,56520,2,21580,5,192119,6,0,856,324793,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AX((p10==1)) + AX(((p66==1)&&(p164==1)))) + ((((p184==1)&&(p40==1))&&((p97==1)&&(p63==1))) + (A((p109==1) U (p24==1)) * (AG(((p123==...186
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EX(!((p10==1)))) + !(EX(!(((p66==1)&&(p164==1)))))) + ((((p184==1)&&(p40==1))&&((p97==1)&&(p63=...300
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t4, t6, t15, t23, t34, t40, t51, t55, t57, t58, t70, t72, t73, t86, t89, t95, t97, t1...343
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12953739788286687082.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12953739788286687082.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12953739788286687082.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12953739788286687082.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12953739788286687082.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2004012559023880712.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:26:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability65023963853534507.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2004012559023880712.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability65023963853534507.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.52426e+12,0.108421,8820,1264,14,10194,167,399,13173,28,340,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AX((i7.i0.u4.p10==1)) + AX(((i4.u20.p66==1)&&(i4.u60.p164==1)))) + ((((i14.i0.u61.p184==1)&&(i2.u14.p40==1))&&((i6.u31.p97==1)&&(i4....281
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EX(!((i7.i0.u4.p10==1)))) + !(EX(!(((i4.u20.p66==1)&&(i4.u60.p164==1)))))) + ((((i14.i0.u61.p18...407
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t58, t73, t101, t118, t158, t159, t160, t161, i0.u5.t0, i0.u5.t128, i1.t125, i1.t120, i1.u9.t...487
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 175 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 175 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 175 transition count 169
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 167 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 167 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 166 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 166 transition count 160
Applied a total of 61 rules in 8 ms. Remains 166 /195 variables (removed 29) and now considering 160/192 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 166 cols
[2025-05-30 16:27:00] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:27:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:27:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 3/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 160/326 variables, 166/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 326/326 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 13818 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 33/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 160/326 variables, 166/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 159/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 7/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 5/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 2/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 5/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 326/326 variables, and 393 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 43844ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43845ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 166/195 places, 160/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44035 ms. Remains : 166/195 places, 160/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:27:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:27:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14621397724044350384.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:27:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17346078574438435671.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14621397724044350384.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17346078574438435671.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.34446e+12,1.00655,40348,2,16843,5,133865,6,0,826,215374,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((p58==0) * EF(AX((p113==0)))) * (((p116==0) + EF(!(E((p54==1) U ((p194==1)&&(p202==1)))))) * (AG((p81==0)) + ((p33==0)&&(p30==0))))...197
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((p58==0) * E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p113==0)))))) * (((p116==0) + E(TRUE U !(E((p54==1) U ((p194==1)&&(p20...270
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t16, t24, t35, t41, t52, t56, t58, t59, t69, t71, t72, t83, t86, ...347
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10407791263045201091.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10407791263045201091.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10407791263045201091.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10407791263045201091.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10407791263045201091.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8740081297574522665.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17209383834175043445.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8740081297574522665.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17209383834175043445.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.34446e+12,0.113894,8388,924,14,9333,177,389,11964,32,394,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((i4.u17.p58==0) * EF(AX((i8.u31.p113==0)))) * (((i8.u32.p116==0) + EF(!(E((i4.u16.p54==1) U ((i15.i0.u66.p194==1)&&(i10.i2.u70.p202...295
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((i4.u17.p58==0) * E(TRUE U !(EX(!((i8.u31.p113==0)))))) * (((i8.u32.p116==0) + E(TRUE U !(E((i4.u1...368
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t56, t59, t72, t90, t97, t112, t152, t153, t154, t155, i0.u4.t0, i0.u4.t122, i1.t119, i1.t114...485
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,7.27034,286516,1,0,757508,177,2391,672174,152,394,870808
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 72 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 72 transitions
Performed 72 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 72
Iterating post reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 194 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 122 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 118 transition count 106
Performed 26 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 26 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 118 transition count 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 92 transition count 80
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 77 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 77 transition count 65
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 77 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 72 transition count 60
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 52 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 51 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 49 transition count 39
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 49 transition count 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 47 transition count 37
Applied a total of 300 rules in 39 ms. Remains 47 /195 variables (removed 148) and now considering 37/192 (removed 155) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 47 cols
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [19, 27, 35, 40, 46]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/195 places, 37/192 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 39 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 39 transition count 34
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 38 transition count 33
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 38 transition count 33
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 37 transition count 32
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 37 transition count 32
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 36 transition count 31
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 36 /42 variables (removed 6) and now considering 31/37 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 36 cols
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/195 places, 31/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 185 ms. Remains : 36/195 places, 31/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 31 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9853009285020788220.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8692331440961043771.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9853009285020788220.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8692331440961043771.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12816,0.006659,3912,2,132,5,816,6,0,172,749,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p65==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p65==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t28, t29, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect...173
(forward)formula 0,0,0.024424,4936,1,0,74,6061,83,33,991,5141,76
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 175 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 175 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 175 transition count 169
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 167 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 167 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 166 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 166 transition count 160
Applied a total of 61 rules in 8 ms. Remains 166 /195 variables (removed 29) and now considering 160/192 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 166 cols
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 190 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:28:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 13/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 7/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 4/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 160/326 variables, 166/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 6/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/326 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 326/326 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 24325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 36/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 160/326 variables, 166/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 159/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 5/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 2/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 4/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 326/326 variables, and 391 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 54345ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54346ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 166/195 places, 160/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54545 ms. Remains : 166/195 places, 160/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:29:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:29:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14347034018968061035.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5941462858751154094.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14347034018968061035.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5941462858751154094.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.44855e+12,0.633658,29112,2,13308,5,93643,6,0,826,145831,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(((p108!=1) * AF(((p130==1)&&(p204==1)))) U (p188==1))) * (EX(AX(A(E((p135==1) U (p129==1)) U (p150==1)))) + EX(EF((A(((p37==1)&&(p16...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,((p108!=1) * !(EG(!(((p130==1)&&(p204==1))))))) * (p188==1))] = FALSE * [((Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U (!(...441
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t5, t15, t23, t34, t40, t52, t55, t56, t58, t61, t69, t70, t72, t73, t84, t87...332
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13833466239260596128.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13833466239260596128.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13833466239260596128.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13833466239260596128.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13833466239260596128.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 35 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9599367703016313273.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:29:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11379316215737580092.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9599367703016313273.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11379316215737580092.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.44855e+12,0.093764,8296,856,23,8934,208,423,10728,36,472,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(((i8.u30.p108!=1) * AF(((i2.u38.p130==1)&&(i12.i2.u69.p204==1)))) U (i3.u61.p188==1))) * (EX(AX(A(E((i11.u40.p135==1) U (i10.i0.u37....341
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,((i8.u30.p108!=1) * !(EG(!(((i2.u38.p130==1)&&(i12.i2.u69.p204==1))))))) * (i3.u61.p188==1))] = FAL...624
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t56, t70, t73, t91, t98, t113, t152, t153, t154, t155, i0.u5.t0, i0.u5.t1, i0.u5.t120, i1.i0....495
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 174 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 174 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 174 transition count 168
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 168 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 168 transition count 162
Applied a total of 57 rules in 14 ms. Remains 168 /195 variables (removed 27) and now considering 162/192 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 162 rows 168 cols
[2025-05-30 16:30:17] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:30:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:30:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 12/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 6/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/330 variables, 168/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 6/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/330 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 330/330 variables, and 212 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 12175 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 168/168 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 28/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 162/330 variables, 168/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 161/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 2/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 2/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 2/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 5/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 2/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 330/330 variables, and 389 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 168/168 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 42194ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42194ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 168/195 places, 162/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42375 ms. Remains : 168/195 places, 162/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:30:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 162 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:30:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16313741018705961813.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:30:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17110369918416578675.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16313741018705961813.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17110369918416578675.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.02527e+12,1.08187,43668,2,16245,5,147995,6,0,836,236682,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(E((((p86==1)||(p196!=1))||((p83==1)||(p109==1))) U !((!(EF((p197==1))) + (p79!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),(((p86==1)||(p196!=1))||((p83==1)||(p109==1)))) * !((p79!=1))),TRUE) * (p197==1))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 154/0/8
(forward)formula 0,0,3.25916,108124,1,0,14,409241,18,3,1840,652928,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 175 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 175 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 175 transition count 169
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 168 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 168 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 167 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 167 transition count 161
Applied a total of 59 rules in 15 ms. Remains 167 /195 variables (removed 28) and now considering 161/192 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 167 cols
[2025-05-30 16:31:02] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:31:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 160 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:31:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/167 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 4/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 5/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 161/328 variables, 167/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 11124 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 167/167 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/167 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 31/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 4/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 161/328 variables, 167/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 160/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 5/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 388 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 167/167 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 41144ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41144ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 167/195 places, 161/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41327 ms. Remains : 167/195 places, 161/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 161 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability785425898506240460.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:31:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9744537349657468830.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability785425898506240460.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9744537349657468830.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.90469e+12,0.769875,33940,2,13370,5,116417,6,0,831,170715,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((A((p96==1) U E((p181==1) U (p137==1))) * !(A((p93==1) U (p92==1))))) + EG((((p34==0) + EF((p122==0))) * EG(((p138==0)&&(p81==0)))))...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p178==1)))))))) * !(EG((((p34==0) + E(TRUE U (p122==0))) * EG(((p138=...378
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t14, t22, t34, t37, t40, t51, t55, t57, t58, t68, t70, t71, t84, t87,...325
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12925364247175763716.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12925364247175763716.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12925364247175763716.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12925364247175763716.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12925364247175763716.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 36 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15622816037548807398.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12805698537478144139.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15622816037548807398.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12805698537478144139.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.90469e+12,0.068042,6988,812,14,6598,171,389,6033,30,378,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((A((i8.u27.p96==1) U E((i15.u63.p181==1) U (i12.u42.p137==1))) * !(A((i8.u26.p93==1) U (i8.u26.p92==1))))) + EG((((i4.u11.p34==0) + ...255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((i15.u61.p178==1)))))))) * !(EG((((i4.u11.p34==0) + E(TRUE U (i0.u36.p...498
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t55, t58, t68, t71, t91, t98, t114, t154, t155, i0.t57, i2.u6.t0, i2.u6.t123, i3.u9.t1, i3.u9...472
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 176 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 176 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 176 transition count 170
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 171 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 171 transition count 165
Applied a total of 51 rules in 7 ms. Remains 171 /195 variables (removed 24) and now considering 165/192 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 171 cols
[2025-05-30 16:32:44] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:32:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 164 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:32:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 10/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 165/336 variables, 171/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 3/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/336 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 230 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 15350 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 43/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/336 variables, 171/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 164/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 6/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 3/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 410 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 45373ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45373ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/195 places, 165/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45522 ms. Remains : 171/195 places, 165/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:33:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:33:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17987563640775087904.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:33:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10584567588415540118.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17987563640775087904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10584567588415540118.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.68458e+12,1.77256,66252,2,22364,5,219722,6,0,851,387145,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((!(E(!(AG((p174==1))) U !(AX(((p123==1)&&(p193==1)))))) * (p113==0)) * ((((p50==1)||(p100==1)) + (AX((p54==0)) * EG((p107==0)))) * ((...252
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p174==1))))) U !(!(EX(!(((p123==1)&&(p193==1)))))))) * (p113==0)) * ((((p50==...321
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t10, t17, t25, t36, t42, t53, t57, t59, t61, t70, t72, t75, t83, ...358
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15880572880009012130.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15880572880009012130.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15880572880009012130.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15880572880009012130.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15880572880009012130.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 28 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4508150629099678136.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2776046620872963025.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4508150629099678136.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2776046620872963025.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.68458e+12,0.176427,12128,1683,26,17269,243,405,23659,42,685,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((!(E(!(AG((i8.u60.p174==1))) U !(AX(((i10.u36.p123==1)&&(i10.u68.p193==1)))))) * (i9.u35.p113==0)) * ((((i3.u11.p50==1)||(i7.u28.p100...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i8.u60.p174==1))))) U !(!(EX(!(((i10.u36.p123==1)&&(i10.u68.p193==1)))))))) *...443
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t57, t70, t94, t101, t118, t157, t158, t159, t160, i1.u6.t0, i1.u6.t127, i2.u8.t1, i2.u8.t121...534
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 174 transition count 171
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 174 transition count 171
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 174 transition count 169
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 166 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 166 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 165 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 165 transition count 160
Applied a total of 62 rules in 7 ms. Remains 165 /195 variables (removed 30) and now considering 160/192 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 165 cols
[2025-05-30 16:34:30] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:34:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:34:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 19/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 160/325 variables, 165/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/325 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 325/325 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 9273 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 165/165 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 21/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 160/325 variables, 165/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 159/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 8/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 1/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 1/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 5/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 325/325 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 165/165 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 39290ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39291ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 165/195 places, 160/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39443 ms. Remains : 165/195 places, 160/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4549061400807229672.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10161634380868552395.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4549061400807229672.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10161634380868552395.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.75253e+12,0.623737,29676,2,12628,5,100610,6,0,822,145016,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(AX(!(((p84==1)||(p17==1)))) U AG((p195==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EX(!(!(((p84==1)||(p17==1)))))) U !(E(TRUE U !((p195==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t13, t22, t25, t33, t39, t50, t54, t56, t57, t67, t69, t70, t83, t85, t89, t9...316
(forward)formula 0,0,8.88749,273416,1,0,286,1.08819e+06,346,159,4553,1.31999e+06,338
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 177 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 177 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 177 transition count 172
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 171 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 171 transition count 166
Applied a total of 50 rules in 5 ms. Remains 171 /195 variables (removed 24) and now considering 166/192 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 171 cols
[2025-05-30 16:35:18] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:35:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 165 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:35:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 11/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 166/337 variables, 171/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 7/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/337 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 337/337 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 11932 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 29/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 4/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 166/337 variables, 171/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 165/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 5/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 4/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 2/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 1/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 337/337 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 41955ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41955ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/195 places, 166/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42109 ms. Remains : 171/195 places, 166/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:36:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:36:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:36:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 166 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:36:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:36:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:36:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14296594136421243499.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:36:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11772511153547318102.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14296594136421243499.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11772511153547318102.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.67384e+12,1.63687,61520,2,22364,5,206539,6,0,852,357802,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(A((((p185==1)||(p180==1)) * EG((p58==1))) U (AF((p18==1)) * AF((p93==1)))) U ((((p20==1)&&(p69!=1)) + !(AX((p53==1)))) + A((p24==1)...204
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!((E(!((!(EG(!((p18==1)))) * !(EG(!((p93==1)))))) U (!((((p185==1)||(p180==1)) * EG((p5...469
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t17, t25, t36, t42, t53, t57, t59, t60, t70, t72, t73, t8...339
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12925314660643634258.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12925314660643634258.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12925314660643634258.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12925314660643634258.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12925314660643634258.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3441302484478205125.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:36:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9347333892743912879.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3441302484478205125.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9347333892743912879.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.67384e+12,0.116658,9428,1117,25,11504,285,400,14187,45,746,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(A((((i11.u66.p185==1)||(i16.i0.u57.p180==1)) * EG((i4.u16.p58==1))) U (AF((i1.u6.p18==1)) * AF((i7.u26.p93==1)))) U ((((i1.u5.p20==...289
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!((E(!((!(EG(!((i1.u6.p18==1)))) * !(EG(!((i7.u26.p93==1)))))) U (!((((i11.u66.p185==1)...592
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t57, t60, t70, t73, t94, t101, t118, t159, t160, t161, i1.u6.t0, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t126, i2.t12...479
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 72 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 72 transitions
Performed 72 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 72
Iterating post reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 194 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 85 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 122 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 118 transition count 106
Performed 26 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 26 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 118 transition count 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 92 transition count 80
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 76 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 76 transition count 64
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 76 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 71 transition count 59
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 52 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 51 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 49 transition count 39
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 49 transition count 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 300 place count 47 transition count 37
Applied a total of 300 rules in 22 ms. Remains 47 /195 variables (removed 148) and now considering 37/192 (removed 155) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 47 cols
[2025-05-30 16:37:00] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [18, 26, 35, 40, 46]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 36 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/195 places, 37/192 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 42 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 41 transition count 36
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 39 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 39 transition count 34
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 38 transition count 33
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 38 /42 variables (removed 4) and now considering 33/37 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 38 cols
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 38/195 places, 33/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 132 ms. Remains : 38/195 places, 33/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1391237379021044459.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4178922044378659182.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1391237379021044459.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4178922044378659182.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 24547 steps (2120 resets) in 102 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 173 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 173 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 173 transition count 167
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 165 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 165 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 164 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 164 transition count 158
Applied a total of 65 rules in 6 ms. Remains 164 /195 variables (removed 31) and now considering 158/192 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 164 cols
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:37:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 9/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 158/322 variables, 164/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 10259 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 13/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 6/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 158/322 variables, 164/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 157/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 3/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 376 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 40277ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40277ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/195 places, 158/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40508 ms. Remains : 164/195 places, 158/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability508446277026874209.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:37:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16745203232968227324.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability508446277026874209.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16745203232968227324.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.60138e+12,0.330315,18180,2,9641,5,57330,6,0,816,74486,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EF(((p82==1)&&(p140==1))) * A((p128==1) U (p70!=1))) * ((p92==0)&&(p131==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((EY(Init) * ((p92==0)&&(p131==0))) * E(TRUE U ((p82==1)&&(p140==1)))) * !(EG(!((p70!=1))))) * !(E(!((p70!=1)...200
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t13, t21, t32, t38, t49, t53, t55, t56, t66, t68, t69, t82, t85, t89, t92, t9...311
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14630204748938921427.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14630204748938921427.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14630204748938921427.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14630204748938921427.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14630204748938921427.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 36 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15965224139218435437.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4650625701628655628.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15965224139218435437.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4650625701628655628.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.60138e+12,0.05492,6208,668,15,4973,192,401,4165,35,365,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((EF(((i7.u22.p82==1)&&(i7.u42.p140==1))) * A((i13.i1.u37.p128==1) U (i6.u19.p70!=1))) * ((i8.u26.p92==0)&&(i4.u38.p131==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((EY(Init) * ((i8.u26.p92==0)&&(i4.u38.p131==0))) * E(TRUE U ((i7.u22.p82==1)&&(i7.u42.p140==1)))) * !(EG(!((...260
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t53, t56, t66, t69, t89, t96, t111, t151, t152, t153, i0.t55, i2.u4.t0, i2.u4.t120, i3.u7.t1,...431
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,1,8.11232,291392,1,0,684752,192,2425,686234,166,366,783643
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 195/195 places, 192/192 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 194 transition count 120
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 123 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 119 transition count 107
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 119 transition count 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 92 transition count 80
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 76 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 76 transition count 64
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 76 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 71 transition count 59
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 53 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 52 transition count 40
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 51 transition count 40
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 51 transition count 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 50 transition count 39
Applied a total of 295 rules in 21 ms. Remains 50 /195 variables (removed 145) and now considering 39/192 (removed 153) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 50 cols
[2025-05-30 16:38:19] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned [21, 29, 37, 43, 49]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 38 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/195 places, 39/192 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 42 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 42 transition count 36
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 41 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 41 transition count 35
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 40 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 40 transition count 34
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 39 transition count 33
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 39 /45 variables (removed 6) and now considering 33/39 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 39 cols
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 39/195 places, 33/192 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 145 ms. Remains : 39/195 places, 33/192 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 391 steps (29 resets) in 4 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5339114130101734073.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12144706810069832195.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5339114130101734073.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12144706810069832195.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12708443102824574791.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12708443102824574791.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12708443102824574791.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12708443102824574791.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12708443102824574791.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 25 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1949234089603077644.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:38:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5681156266037317461.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1949234089603077644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5681156266037317461.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.21959e+13,0.584394,29072,3507,43,52130,449,507,78546,52,1488,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(AF((i5.i1.u21.p63==1)) U A((i12.i0.u64.p167==1) U (i0.i0.u2.p5==1)))) * AF((EX(AF((i14.i0.u69.p178==0))) + AF((((i11.i0.u49.p130==1)...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((i0.i0.u2.p5==1)) U (!((i12.i0.u64.p167==1)) * !((i0.i0.u2.p5==1)))) + EG(!((i0.i0.u2.p...583
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, t184, t185, t186, t187, i0.t69, i0.i1.t71, i1.u6.t0, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t2, i1.u6.t150, i2....681
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,726.49,3680220,1,0,7.12102e+06,461,982,9.2933e+06,106,1488,3153597
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(((AX((i5.i0.u4.p10==1)) + AX(((i5.i1.u20.p66==1)&&(i5.i1.u63.p164==1)))) + ((((i14.i1.u72.p184==1)&&(i3.i0.u15.p40==1))&&((i7.i2.u35.p...305
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EX(!((i5.i0.u4.p10==1)))) + !(EX(!(((i5.i1.u20.p66==1)&&(i5.i1.u63.p164==1)))))) + ((((i14.i1.u...437
(forward)formula 1,0,1003.26,4524996,1,0,8.46522e+06,461,977,1.16401e+07,103,1488,1432970
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (!(E(((i9.i0.u40.p108!=1) * AF(((i11.i0.u49.p130==1)&&(i12.i1.u81.p204==1)))) U (i4.u74.p188==1))) * (EX(AX(A(E((i10.u51.p135==1) U (i11....345
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,((i9.i0.u40.p108!=1) * !(EG(!(((i11.i0.u49.p130==1)&&(i12.i1.u81.p204==1))))))) * (i4.u74.p188==1))...628
(forward)formula 2,1,1322.35,5015768,1,0,9.32137e+06,488,1584,1.30339e+07,132,1488,6311923
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-02b-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: ((AF((A((i7.i1.u34.p96==1) U E((i14.i1.u70.p181==1) U (i10.u52.p137==1))) * !(A((i7.i1.u33.p93==1) U (i7.i1.u33.p92==1))))) + EG((((i3.i0...276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((i14.i0.u69.p178==1)))))))) * !(EG((((i3.i0.u11.p34==0) + E(TRUE U (i0...531
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 17:04:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 17:04:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 17:04:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 17:04:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 6 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 17:04:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-30 17:04:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10287763721066678485.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 17:04:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability380160765160953823.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10287763721066678485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability380160765160953823.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.21959e+13,9.84696,347184,11938,597,421882,1480,417,3.35729e+06,204,8010,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((A((i0.i0.i0.i0.u16.p96==1) U E((i1.i0.i0.u26.p181==1) U (i1.i0.i0.i0.u24.p137==1))) * !(A((i0.i0.i0.i0.u16.p93==1) U (i0.i0.i0.i0.u...341
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !(EX(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((i1.i0.i0.u26.p178==1)))))))) * !(EG((((i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u12.p3...628
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.t69, i0.u19.t71, i0.i0.u18.t74, i0.i0.u18.t84, i0.i0.i0.t85, i0.i0.i0.u17.t87, i0.i0.i0.i0...1236

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-02b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-02b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729300466"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-02b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-02b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;