Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729300450.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-01b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729300450
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 416K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748621353242

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-01b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 51 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Transformed 114 places.
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Transformed 112 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 114 places and 112 transitions and 264 arcs in 156 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 69 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 112/112 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 8 rules in 21 ms. Remains 110 /114 variables (removed 4) and now considering 108/112 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 110 cols
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 224 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 381 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 6517 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 26/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 107/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 23716 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 30266ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30283ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/114 places, 108/112 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30703 ms. Remains : 110/114 places, 108/112 transitions.
Support contains 69 out of 110 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 110 places (down from 69) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (597 resets) in 969 ms. (41 steps per ms) remains 10/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (110 resets) in 174 ms. (228 steps per ms) remains 5/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (116 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (101 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (112 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (112 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (110 resets) in 99 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 91/103 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 7/110 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 310 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 72/77 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 25/102 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 8/110 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 213 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/4 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 527ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 47 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=11 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 7 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 110 places (down from 65) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 98 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 98 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 94
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 94 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 94 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 93 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 93 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 92 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 92 transition count 88
Applied a total of 38 rules in 19 ms. Remains 92 /110 variables (removed 18) and now considering 88/108 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 87 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 88/180 variables, 92/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 180/180 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 2855 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 88/180 variables, 92/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 87/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 4/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 180/180 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 15628 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 18495ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18495ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/110 places, 88/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18621 ms. Remains : 92/110 places, 88/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14109176139461602090.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16063243525796906925.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14109176139461602090.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16063243525796906925.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86051e+07,0.04673,5476,2,1545,5,7064,6,0,458,6876,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF((((p109==1)||((p41==1)&&(p86==1)))||((p106==1)||(p109==1)))) * A(((p5==1) * EX((p96==1))) U (A((p80==1) U (p54==1)) + EF((p96==1))...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((p109==1)||((p41==1)&&(p86==1)))||((p106==1)||(p109==1))))))] = FALSE * (([(Fw...719
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t9, t17, t22, t30, t34, t36, t37, t49, t52, t56, t59, t65, t83, t84, Intersection wi...237
(forward)formula 0,0,7.72211,283960,1,0,873,1.63859e+06,213,402,2609,1.98053e+06,1000
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 109 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 75 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 73 transition count 66
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 73 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 55 transition count 48
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 48 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 48 transition count 41
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 48 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 45 transition count 38
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 32 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 31 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 30 transition count 24
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 30 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 29 transition count 23
Applied a total of 163 rules in 32 ms. Remains 29 /110 variables (removed 81) and now considering 23/108 (removed 85) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 29 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [17, 22, 28]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/110 places, 23/108 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 25 transition count 22
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 25 transition count 22
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 23 transition count 20
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 23 /26 variables (removed 3) and now considering 20/23 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 23 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 23/110 places, 20/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 174 ms. Remains : 23/110 places, 20/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13934577711549502301.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3719159905939857580.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13934577711549502301.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3719159905939857580.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,612,0.00451,3832,2,103,5,457,6,0,111,410,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p10==1) * EG((p77!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p10==1)),(p77!=1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 18/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.009457,4088,1,0,10,1720,20,5,541,1345,9
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 98 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 98 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 98 transition count 95
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 94 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 94 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 93 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 93 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 92 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 92 transition count 89
Applied a total of 37 rules in 26 ms. Remains 92 /110 variables (removed 18) and now considering 89/108 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 9/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 89/181 variables, 92/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 4/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 181/181 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 4367 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 16/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 89/181 variables, 92/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 88/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 3/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 181/181 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 9341 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 13713ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13714ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/110 places, 89/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13839 ms. Remains : 92/110 places, 89/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2804108924424387655.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5498836927981795000.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2804108924424387655.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5498836927981795000.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93035e+07,0.035115,5536,2,1527,5,6932,6,0,459,6698,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(((p26==1) * AX((p12==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(((p26==1) * !(EX(!((p12==0)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t9, t17, t22, t30, t34, t36, t37, t48, t51, t55, t58, t64, t84, t85, Intersection wi...237
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,10.9592,386916,1,0,872,2.3505e+06,208,514,2611,2.76874e+06,848
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 100 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 100 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 100 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 97 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 96 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 95 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 95 transition count 91
Applied a total of 32 rules in 20 ms. Remains 95 /110 variables (removed 15) and now considering 91/108 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:38] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:10:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 91/186 variables, 95/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/186 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 186/186 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 4138 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 17/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 91/186 variables, 95/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 90/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/186 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 186/186 variables, and 220 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 7928 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 12073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12073ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/110 places, 91/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12217 ms. Remains : 95/110 places, 91/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability174346375894980409.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16937209119773692532.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability174346375894980409.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16937209119773692532.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.13196e+07,0.070853,7364,2,2315,5,14042,6,0,473,18433,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((p68==1)&&(p112==1)) + ((EG((EF((p65==0)) * (p37==0))) * (p83==0)) * !(E(((p28==1)||(p104==1)) U ((p111==1)||(p80==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * ((p68==1)&&(p112==1)))] != FALSE + [((EY(Init) * (EG((E(TRUE U (p65==0)) * (p37==0))) * (p83==0)))...221
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t4, t11, t19, t25, t28, t33, t37, t39, t40, t51, t54, t58, t60, t62, t65, t68, t8...266
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,15.4721,512420,1,0,1047,3.01328e+06,219,592,2794,3.63106e+06,1032
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 109 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 75 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 73 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 71 transition count 64
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 71 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 53 transition count 46
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 44 transition count 37
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 44 transition count 37
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 44 transition count 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 42 transition count 35
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 31 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 30 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 29 transition count 23
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 29 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 28 transition count 22
Applied a total of 165 rules in 11 ms. Remains 28 /110 variables (removed 82) and now considering 22/108 (removed 86) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 28 cols
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned [10, 15, 20, 27]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/110 places, 22/108 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 22 transition count 20
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 20
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 21 transition count 19
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 21 transition count 19
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 20 transition count 18
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 20 /24 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/22 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 20 cols
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 20/110 places, 18/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 117 ms. Remains : 20/110 places, 18/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18175258280585612508.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12619401402948413466.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18175258280585612508.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12619401402948413466.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,306,0.003849,3796,2,58,5,312,6,0,98,236,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p26==0)||(p98==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p26==0)||(p98==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 14/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.010489,4052,1,0,10,1402,19,4,464,1184,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 97 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 97 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 93
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 93 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 93 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 92 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 92 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 91 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 91 transition count 87
Applied a total of 40 rules in 5 ms. Remains 91 /110 variables (removed 19) and now considering 87/108 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 91 cols
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 251 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 87/178 variables, 91/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 2/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 178/178 variables, and 111 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 3747 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 87/178 variables, 91/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 86/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 3/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 178/178 variables, and 208 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 10024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 13781ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13781ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/110 places, 87/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14038 ms. Remains : 91/110 places, 87/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2940426595434996290.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10703448118573479548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2940426595434996290.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10703448118573479548.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67448e+07,0.03567,5508,2,1520,5,6911,6,0,453,6687,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(EX((p41==1))) U !(EG(((p105!=1) + E((p61==1) U (p55==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(((p105!=1) + E((p61==1) U (p55==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(((p105!=1) + E((p61==1) U (p55==1)...246
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t9, t17, t22, t30, t34, t36, t37, t48, t51, t55, t58, t64, t82, t83, Intersection wi...237
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,11.5375,402952,1,0,1086,2.37771e+06,207,701,2578,2.66979e+06,1144
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 100 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 100 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 100 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 97 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 93
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 97 /110 variables (removed 13) and now considering 93/108 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 97 cols
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 15/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 93/190 variables, 97/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 190/190 variables, and 127 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 4553 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 93/190 variables, 97/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 92/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 5/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 190/190 variables, and 235 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 25091 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 29666ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 29667ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/110 places, 93/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29767 ms. Remains : 97/110 places, 93/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:12:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:12:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4841523027367706318.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6018103129130732647.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4841523027367706318.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6018103129130732647.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.39343e+07,0.148602,11104,2,4364,5,27942,6,0,483,41337,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((p8==0) * EG(!(E((p92==1) U ((p68==1)&&(p112==1)))))) * AF(AX((AG((p21==1)) * (p45==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * ((p8==0) * EG(!(E((p92==1) U ((p68==1)&&(p112==1))))))) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((p21==1)))) ...183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t11, t19, t25, t28, t33, t37, t39, t40, t52, t55, t56, t60, t61, t63, t68, t70, t...272
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,29.863,971264,1,0,1463,5.95484e+06,226,854,2843,6.60187e+06,1503
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 98 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 98 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 94
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 95 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 95 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 94 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 94 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 93 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 93 transition count 89
Applied a total of 36 rules in 10 ms. Remains 93 /110 variables (removed 17) and now considering 89/108 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 16:12:31] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 89/182 variables, 93/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 182/182 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 3081 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 89/182 variables, 93/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 88/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 3/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 182/182 variables, and 212 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 16921 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 20010ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20010ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/110 places, 89/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20141 ms. Remains : 93/110 places, 89/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1922523885613045371.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2947688012354490062.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1922523885613045371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2947688012354490062.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.73438e+07,0.0407,5668,2,1731,5,7474,6,0,463,8055,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EX(AG(AX((p41==1)))) + (p47==1)) + AF(AX(E(((p26==1)&&(p98==1)) U (p85==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EX(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((p41==1)))))))) + (p47==1)) + !(EG(!(!(EX(!(E(((p26==1)&&(p98==1)) U (p85=...177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t10, t18, t23, t31, t35, t37, t40, t48, t50, t53, t57, t60, t66, t83, t84, t85, Inte...248
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,9.21628,306344,1,0,725,1.70613e+06,218,455,2746,1.93714e+06,736
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 97 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 97 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 93
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 93 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 93 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 92 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 92 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 91 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 91 transition count 87
Applied a total of 40 rules in 11 ms. Remains 91 /110 variables (removed 19) and now considering 87/108 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 91 cols
[2025-05-30 16:13:01] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:13:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:13:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 87/178 variables, 91/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 2/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 178/178 variables, and 111 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 3842 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 87/178 variables, 91/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 86/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 3/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 178/178 variables, and 208 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 9922 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 13770ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13770ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/110 places, 87/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13875 ms. Remains : 91/110 places, 87/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3519823336244328576.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1487432186168636875.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3519823336244328576.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1487432186168636875.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67448e+07,0.034872,5508,2,1520,5,6911,6,0,453,6687,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((AF(EX(((p95==1)&&(p112==1)))) + EG((AF((p14==1)) * (p82!=1)))) U (p16==1)) U (EX(((EG((p25==1)) + E(((p84==1)&&(p112==1)) U ((p38==1...196
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(EY((FwdU(Init,!((E(!((p16==1)) U (!((!(EG(!(EX(((p95==1)&&(p112==1)))))) + EG((!(EG(!((p14==1)))) * (p82...660
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t9, t17, t22, t30, t34, t36, t37, t48, t51, t55, t58, t64, t82, t83, Intersection wi...237
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,19.6709,630628,1,0,2405,3.75098e+06,233,1264,2595,4.53163e+06,2614
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 100 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 100 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 100 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 96 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 96 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 95 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 95 transition count 92
Applied a total of 31 rules in 5 ms. Remains 95 /110 variables (removed 15) and now considering 92/108 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/187 variables, 95/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/187 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 187/187 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2776 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 4/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/187 variables, 95/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 91/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 3/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 3/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/187 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/187 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/187 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 187/187 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 23881 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 26663ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26663ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/110 places, 92/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26757 ms. Remains : 95/110 places, 92/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3210157441984520323.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16000710626595184992.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3210157441984520323.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16000710626595184992.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08874e+07,0.087781,8144,2,2802,5,16631,6,0,474,22635,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((AF((p42==1)) + AF((p14==0))) * (AX(AX((p52==0))) + EF(((p35==0)&&(p25==0))))) * (AG(EX(AG((p63==1)))) + (AX(AG((p59==0))) * ((((p10...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((!(EG(!((p42==1)))) + !(EG(!((p14==0))))) * (!(EX(!(!(EX(!((p52==0))))))) + E(TRUE U ((p3...478
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t10, t18, t23, t31, t35, t37, t38, t49, t51, t54, t58, t61, t67, t69, t86, t87, t...257
(forward)formula 0,1,12.8757,445640,1,0,1147,2.6164e+06,226,504,2701,3.21952e+06,1323
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 109 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 76 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 74 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 73 transition count 66
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 73 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 53 transition count 46
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 44 transition count 37
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 44 transition count 37
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 44 transition count 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 41 transition count 34
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 31 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 30 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 29 transition count 23
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 29 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 28 transition count 22
Applied a total of 165 rules in 23 ms. Remains 28 /110 variables (removed 82) and now considering 22/108 (removed 86) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 28 cols
[2025-05-30 16:14:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [9, 14, 27]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/110 places, 22/108 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 24 transition count 21
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 24 transition count 21
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 23 transition count 20
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 23 transition count 20
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 21 transition count 18
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 18/22 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 21 cols
[2025-05-30 16:14:14] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:14:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 54 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 21/110 places, 18/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 111 ms. Remains : 21/110 places, 18/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 18 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4855487950743413981.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8686519816682617898.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4855487950743413981.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8686519816682617898.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,336,0.00592,3852,2,58,5,268,6,0,101,206,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((p108==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p108==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 16/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.009616,3980,1,0,8,1029,20,3,489,682,8
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 98 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 98 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 98 transition count 94
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 94 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 94 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 93 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 93 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 92 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 92 transition count 88
Applied a total of 38 rules in 10 ms. Remains 92 /110 variables (removed 18) and now considering 88/108 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 87 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 88/180 variables, 92/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 180/180 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 3945 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 88/180 variables, 92/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 87/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 2/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 2/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/180 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 180/180 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 9342 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 13290ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13291ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/110 places, 88/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13391 ms. Remains : 92/110 places, 88/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12495020715906018209.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10172854249354716876.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12495020715906018209.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10172854249354716876.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86378e+07,0.044534,6036,2,1553,5,8710,6,0,458,9462,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((EX(EX((p16==0))) + (p77==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((EX(EX((p16==0))) + (p77==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t9, t17, t22, t31, t34, t35, t37, t38, t49, t52, t56, t59, t65, t83, t84, Intersecti...242
(forward)formula 0,0,1.12147,50648,1,0,260,223126,204,110,2602,271519,288
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 100 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 100 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 100 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 97 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 96 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 96 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 95 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 95 transition count 91
Applied a total of 32 rules in 11 ms. Remains 95 /110 variables (removed 15) and now considering 91/108 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 95 cols
[2025-05-30 16:14:29] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:14:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/186 variables, 95/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/186 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 186/186 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 3246 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 12/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 91/186 variables, 95/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 90/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/186 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/186 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 186/186 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 19361 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 22620ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22622ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/110 places, 91/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22745 ms. Remains : 95/110 places, 91/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14459566106460083039.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16291429367298195330.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14459566106460083039.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16291429367298195330.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.80588e+07,0.056885,6468,2,2267,5,10372,6,0,473,13235,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((EX((p1==1)) + ((AX((p87==1)) * (p13==1)) * (EG((p47==1)) + (p37==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((EX((p1==1)) + ((!(EX(!((p87==1)))) * (p13==1)) * (EG((p47==1)) + (p37==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t12, t20, t25, t33, t37, t39, t42, t50, t52, t55, t59, t62, t66, t85, t86...260
(forward)formula 0,0,2.52384,99852,1,0,435,514476,213,176,2565,641194,497
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 109 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 73 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 71 transition count 64
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 71 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 53 transition count 46
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 45 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 45 transition count 38
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 45 transition count 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 42 transition count 35
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 30 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 29 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 28 transition count 22
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 28 transition count 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 27 transition count 21
Applied a total of 167 rules in 15 ms. Remains 27 /110 variables (removed 83) and now considering 21/108 (removed 87) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 27 cols
[2025-05-30 16:14:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [15, 20, 26]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/110 places, 21/108 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 23 transition count 20
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 20
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 22 transition count 19
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 22 /24 variables (removed 2) and now considering 19/21 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 22 cols
[2025-05-30 16:14:54] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:14:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:14:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/110 places, 19/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 122 ms. Remains : 22/110 places, 19/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 19 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6829845334324777158.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality167033043143936652.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6829845334324777158.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality167033043143936652.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 647 steps (80 resets) in 12 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.

java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 30 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 30 transitions
Performed 30 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 30
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 109 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 79 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 74 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 73 transition count 66
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 73 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 57 transition count 50
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 49 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 49 transition count 42
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 49 transition count 40
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 47 transition count 40
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 35 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 34 transition count 27
Applied a total of 154 rules in 22 ms. Remains 34 /110 variables (removed 76) and now considering 27/108 (removed 81) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 34 cols
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [21, 26, 33]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/110 places, 27/108 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 30 transition count 26
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 30 transition count 26
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 29 transition count 25
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /31 variables (removed 2) and now considering 25/27 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 29 cols
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 29/110 places, 25/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 139 ms. Remains : 29/110 places, 25/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11511261688571206252.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14546844787900676889.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11511261688571206252.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14546844787900676889.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4536,0.005888,3940,2,100,5,704,6,0,144,617,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF((((EG((p67==0)) * ((p15==0)||(p97==0))) * (p25==0)) + EG((p60==0)))) * EG((p56==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E(TRUE U (((EG((p67==0)) * ((p15==0)||(p97==0))) * (p25==0)) + EG((p60==0))))),(p56==1)...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 23/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.07719,7908,1,0,367,24691,92,173,893,27294,429
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 99 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 99 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 97 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 97 transition count 93
Applied a total of 28 rules in 4 ms. Remains 97 /110 variables (removed 13) and now considering 93/108 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 97 cols
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 93/190 variables, 97/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 190/190 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 5580 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 6/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 93/190 variables, 97/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 92/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 5/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/190 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 190/190 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 9893 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 97/97 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 15477ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15477ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/110 places, 93/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15576 ms. Remains : 97/110 places, 93/108 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5982130422580762327.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability567854226528969845.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5982130422580762327.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability567854226528969845.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.04996e+07,0.079313,7776,2,2501,5,14995,6,0,483,20382,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((EG((p87==1)) * AX((p64==1))) * ((EF(((p32==1)&&(p89==1))) * E((p30==1) U (p47==1))) + (((p30==0)&&(p105==1))&&(p71==1))))) + AX((A(...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((EY((Init * !(!(EG(!(((EG((p87==1)) * !(EX(!((p64==1))))) * ((E(TRUE U ((p32==1)&&(p89==1))) * E((p30==1...522
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t10, t18, t23, t31, t35, t37, t40, t48, t53, t56, t57, t60, t61, t64, t70, t87, t88, ...258
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 91/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 91/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,9.65658,309328,1,0,1048,1.7681e+06,247,493,2912,1.99686e+06,1244
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 16:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:15:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 366210 ms.

BK_STOP 1748621720705

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-01b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-01b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729300450"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-01b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-01b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;