Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853729300449.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is AutoFlight-PT-01b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729300449
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 416K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748621323165

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-01b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 49 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Transformed 114 places.
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Transformed 112 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 114 places and 112 transitions and 264 arcs in 129 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 78 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 112/112 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 112 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 112 transition count 110
Applied a total of 4 rules in 18 ms. Remains 112 /114 variables (removed 2) and now considering 110/112 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 112 cols
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 191 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 337 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 109 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:08:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 110/222 variables, 112/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved in 5475 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 22/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 7/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 110/222 variables, 112/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 109/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 4/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 3/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 4/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved in 23382 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 28900ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28914ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/114 places, 110/112 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29284 ms. Remains : 112/114 places, 110/112 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 112 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
Support contains 71 out of 112 places (down from 78) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (596 resets) in 1113 ms. (35 steps per ms) remains 4/61 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (109 resets) in 177 ms. (224 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (109 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (142 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (123 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 42/45 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 7/112 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 110/222 variables, 112/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 188 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 36/37 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 67/104 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 8/112 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 110/222 variables, 112/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 2/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 2/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 127 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 201 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 393ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 88 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=44 )
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 6 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
Computed a total of 36 stabilizing places and 36 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 100 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 100 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 100 transition count 96
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 95 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 95 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 94 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 94 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 93 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 93 transition count 89
Applied a total of 40 rules in 23 ms. Remains 93 /112 variables (removed 19) and now considering 89/110 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 93 cols
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 89/182 variables, 93/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 3/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 182/182 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 3725 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 12/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 89/182 variables, 93/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 88/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 3/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 3/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 182/182 variables, and 212 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 11822 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 15557ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15558ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/112 places, 89/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15680 ms. Remains : 93/112 places, 89/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality637670670125724129.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12892723575322095274.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality637670670125724129.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12892723575322095274.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.02618e+07,0.073236,6780,2,1925,5,12231,6,0,463,15183,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((p110==0) * EF(EG(((p46==0)||(p52==1)))))) + AG(AF((p83==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !(EX(((p110==0) * E(TRUE U EG(((p46==0)||(p52==1)))))))),TRUE),!((p83==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t10, t18, t24, t27, t32, t36, t38, t40, t50, t53, t57, t60, t66, t83, t84, t85, ...252
(forward)formula 0,1,7.02718,262408,1,0,817,1.49596e+06,214,368,2628,1.96363e+06,915
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 103 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 103 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 103 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 100 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 100 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 99 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 99 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 98 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 98 transition count 94
Applied a total of 30 rules in 26 ms. Remains 98 /112 variables (removed 14) and now considering 94/110 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 98 cols
[2025-05-30 16:09:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:09:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 13/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 94/192 variables, 98/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 4/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/192 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 192/192 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 4586 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 94/192 variables, 98/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 93/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 2/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 2/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 5/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/192 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 192/192 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 15019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 19619ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19620ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/112 places, 94/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19766 ms. Remains : 98/112 places, 94/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality745301578052368687.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:09:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10165428740503366544.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality745301578052368687.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10165428740503366544.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.60024e+07,0.125358,10228,2,4241,5,23909,6,0,488,35885,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(AG((((((p105==0)&&(p21==1))&&((p32==0)&&(p58==1))) + !(E((p2==1) U ((p62==0)||(p59==1))))) + EG((p92==0))))) * EX(AF((((p52==0)||(p5...249
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((((((p105==0)&&(p21==1))&&((p32==0)&&(p58==1))) + !(E((p2==1) U ((p62==0)||(p...374
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t12, t20, t26, t29, t34, t38, t40, t43, t52, t54, t57, t61, t62, t64, t69, t71, t...272
(forward)formula 0,0,20.9047,672456,1,0,858,3.77906e+06,220,378,2900,4.81871e+06,947
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 111 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 75 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 73 transition count 67
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 73 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 56 transition count 50
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 47 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 47 transition count 41
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 47 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 44 transition count 38
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 34 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 33 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 32 transition count 27
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 32 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 31 transition count 26
Applied a total of 162 rules in 26 ms. Remains 31 /112 variables (removed 81) and now considering 26/110 (removed 84) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 31 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned [11, 16, 23, 30]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 28 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 27/112 places, 26/110 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 27 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 26 transition count 25
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 25 transition count 24
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 25 transition count 24
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 24 transition count 23
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 24 transition count 23
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 23 transition count 22
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 23 /27 variables (removed 4) and now considering 22/26 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 23 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 23/112 places, 22/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 121 ms. Remains : 23/112 places, 22/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4012035547848746322.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4807885184310652514.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4012035547848746322.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4807885184310652514.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,504,0.003967,3844,2,61,5,319,6,0,114,249,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A((p33!=0) U ((p12==0)||(p96==1)))) + AG(AF((p87==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !(!(!((E(!(((p12==0)||(p96==1))) U (!((p33!=0)) * !(((p12==0)||(p96==1))))) + EG(!(((p12==0)|...200
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :...164
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 20/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.016206,4612,1,0,76,3498,79,40,694,3472,106
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 111 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 84 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 80 transition count 74
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 80 transition count 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 62 transition count 56
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 55 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 55 transition count 49
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 55 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 52 transition count 46
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 40 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 39 transition count 33
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 38 transition count 33
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 38 transition count 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 37 transition count 32
Applied a total of 150 rules in 11 ms. Remains 37 /112 variables (removed 75) and now considering 32/110 (removed 78) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 37 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned [15, 22, 36]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 29 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/112 places, 32/110 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 33 transition count 31
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 33 transition count 31
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 32 transition count 30
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 32 /34 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 32 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:10:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 57 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 32/112 places, 30/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 32/112 places, 30/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6541966512339560453.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16822864883196010491.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6541966512339560453.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16822864883196010491.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3456,0.005554,3868,2,107,5,580,6,0,159,468,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((p73==1) + (A((p43==0) U ((p54!=1) * EF(((p108==0)||(p73==1))))) * ((p70==0)||(p35==1))))) * AF((p94==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p73==1))),!(((p54!=1) * E(TRUE U ((p108==0)||(p73==1)))))) * !((p43==0))) * !(...536
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 28/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.016593,4508,1,0,20,3963,20,4,747,3607,19
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 111 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 75 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 73 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 71 transition count 64
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 71 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 52 transition count 45
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 43 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 43 transition count 36
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 43 transition count 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 41 transition count 34
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 32 transition count 25
Applied a total of 163 rules in 10 ms. Remains 32 /112 variables (removed 80) and now considering 25/110 (removed 85) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 32 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [14, 19, 24, 31]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/112 places, 25/110 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 26 transition count 23
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 26 transition count 23
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 25 transition count 22
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 25 transition count 22
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 24 transition count 21
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 24 /28 variables (removed 4) and now considering 21/25 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 24 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 24/112 places, 21/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 119 ms. Remains : 24/112 places, 21/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 21 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14901335547919927013.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4963330172354172188.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14901335547919927013.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4963330172354172188.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,298,0.004796,3848,2,139,5,505,6,0,115,367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AF(((p46==0)&&(p41==1))) * (p3==0)) * (p101==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!(((p46==0)&&(p41==1))))) * (p3==0)) * (p101==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t15, t20, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/inter...177
(forward)formula 0,0,0.041358,5896,1,0,196,10877,71,106,664,12782,212
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 111 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 73 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 71 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 70 transition count 63
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 70 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 52 transition count 45
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 44 transition count 37
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 44 transition count 37
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 44 transition count 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 41 transition count 34
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 31 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 30 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 29 transition count 23
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 29 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 28 transition count 22
Applied a total of 169 rules in 8 ms. Remains 28 /112 variables (removed 84) and now considering 22/110 (removed 88) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 28 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned [27]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 27 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 27/112 places, 22/110 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 24 transition count 19
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 24 /27 variables (removed 3) and now considering 19/22 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 24 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 55 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 24/112 places, 19/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 92 ms. Remains : 24/112 places, 19/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 19 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4308526078240956111.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18274303831244085536.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4308526078240956111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18274303831244085536.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,312,0.004183,3852,2,86,5,318,6,0,114,221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(AF(((p93==0)&&(p74==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((p93==0)&&(p74==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t18, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,0,0.026382,5132,1,0,129,7175,70,62,697,7338,150
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 111 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 74 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 72 transition count 66
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 72 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 54 transition count 48
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 46 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 46 transition count 40
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 46 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 44 transition count 38
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 33 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 32 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 31 transition count 26
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 31 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 30 transition count 25
Applied a total of 164 rules in 17 ms. Remains 30 /112 variables (removed 82) and now considering 25/110 (removed 85) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 30 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned [12, 17, 29]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 27/112 places, 25/110 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 26 transition count 24
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 26 transition count 24
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 25 transition count 23
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 25 transition count 23
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 24 transition count 22
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 24 /27 variables (removed 3) and now considering 22/25 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 24 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 24/112 places, 22/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 114 ms. Remains : 24/112 places, 22/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4576335527111061462.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16019362644966332602.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4576335527111061462.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16019362644966332602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,690,0.004194,3860,2,69,5,344,6,0,118,239,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((AF(((p27==0)&&(p20==1))) * (p94==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(!(EG(!(((p27==0)&&(p20==1))))) * (p94==0)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...163
(forward)formula 0,1,0.032007,5396,1,0,149,9812,70,81,655,10375,186
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 104 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 104 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 104 transition count 100
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 100 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 100 transition count 96
Applied a total of 26 rules in 8 ms. Remains 100 /112 variables (removed 12) and now considering 96/110 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 100 cols
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 11/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 96/196 variables, 100/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 196/196 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 3577 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 12/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 96/196 variables, 100/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 95/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 196/196 variables, and 239 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 33598ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 33599ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/112 places, 96/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33712 ms. Remains : 100/112 places, 96/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6677928710475556121.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:10:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1715668291004638015.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6677928710475556121.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1715668291004638015.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.43404e+07,0.158959,11272,2,4383,5,27211,6,0,498,43142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX((((p93==0) + !(EG((p89==1)))) + ((AF((p107==1)) * (((p67==1)||(p27==0))||(p55==1))) + (E((p18==1) U (p30==0)) * AG(((p21==0)||(p113=...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!((E(TRUE U ((p28==0)||(p27==1))) * (p10!=1))))) * (p4==1)))))) * !(E(!((!(EG(!((E(TRUE U...464
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t12, t20, t25, t34, t37, t38, t40, t41, t55, t58, t59, t62, t65, t70, t71...275
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6613378916004976359.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6613378916004976359.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6613378916004976359.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6613378916004976359.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6613378916004976359.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6060808072252424235.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10924245574556619457.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6060808072252424235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10924245574556619457.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.43404e+07,0.047362,5976,432,25,4414,204,280,5902,39,597,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX((((i10.i1.u38.p93==0) + !(EG((i2.u31.p89==1)))) + ((AF((i10.i1.u37.p107==1)) * (((i7.u22.p67==1)||(i2.u8.p27==0))||(i4.u17.p55==1)))...324
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!((E(TRUE U ((i2.u8.p28==0)||(i2.u8.p27==1))) * (i1.u4.p10!=1))))) * (i0.u1.p4==1)))))) *...615
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t41, t90, t91, t92, i1.u4.t0, i1.u4.t1, i1.u4.t71, i1.u4.t73, i2.t70, i2.u7.t2, i2.u7.t3...392
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.51836,152152,1,0,346009,216,1745,383035,202,597,429959
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 100 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 100 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 100 transition count 97
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 94 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 94 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 93 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 93 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 92 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 92 transition count 89
Applied a total of 41 rules in 6 ms. Remains 92 /112 variables (removed 20) and now considering 89/110 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 92 cols
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 89/181 variables, 92/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 181/181 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 4154 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 11/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 89/181 variables, 92/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 88/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 4/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/181 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 181/181 variables, and 213 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 9281 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 13442ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13442ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/112 places, 89/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13567 ms. Remains : 92/112 places, 89/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15602027472185514345.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17810544892267312797.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15602027472185514345.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17810544892267312797.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93261e+07,0.035626,5540,2,1530,5,6956,6,0,459,6730,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(AG((!(E((p99==1) U ((p23==0)||(p33==1)))) * (p85==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(E((p99==1) U ((p23==0)||(p33==1)))) * (p85==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t9, t17, t22, t30, t34, t36, t37, t48, t51, t55, t58, t66, t84, t85, Intersection wi...237
(forward)formula 0,0,0.797764,39384,1,0,230,158384,208,100,2753,196186,266
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 111 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 76 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 74 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 72 transition count 65
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 72 transition count 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 56 transition count 49
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 49 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 49 transition count 42
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 49 transition count 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 46 transition count 39
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 34 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 33 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 32 transition count 26
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 32 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 31 transition count 25
Applied a total of 163 rules in 11 ms. Remains 31 /112 variables (removed 81) and now considering 25/110 (removed 85) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 31 cols
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned [24, 30]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 29 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/112 places, 25/110 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 26 transition count 22
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 26 /29 variables (removed 3) and now considering 22/25 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 26 cols
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 26/112 places, 22/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 108 ms. Remains : 26/112 places, 22/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12438537370340273313.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6659981942023289543.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12438537370340273313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6659981942023289543.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1152,0.004775,3884,2,116,5,459,6,0,124,349,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG((p75==1)) U EG(AG(((p88!=1) * AF(((p81==0)||(p92==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,EG((p75==1))),!(E(TRUE U !(((p88!=1) * !(EG(!(((p81==0)||(p92==1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :...164
(forward)formula 0,0,0.027522,5164,1,0,100,7442,84,43,738,6083,151
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 102 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 102 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 102 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 99 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 99 transition count 96
Applied a total of 27 rules in 3 ms. Remains 99 /112 variables (removed 13) and now considering 96/110 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 99 cols
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 12/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 96/195 variables, 99/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 195/195 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 3969 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 14/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 96/195 variables, 99/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 95/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 4/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 5/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 195/195 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 8701 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 12676ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12677ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/112 places, 96/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12796 ms. Remains : 99/112 places, 96/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:11:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2873882221197848094.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:11:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13916241582539133367.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2873882221197848094.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13916241582539133367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.84148e+07,0.085669,8196,2,2774,5,16683,6,0,494,22263,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(TRUE) * A(((((p20==1)||(p53==1))||((p44==0)||(p103==1))) * EX((p85==0))) U (AF((p16==0)) + (!(((p63==0)||(p46==1))) * EX((p81==0))...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE * ([FwdG(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(EG(!((p16==0)))) + (!(((p63==0)|...426
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t10, t19, t22, t24, t32, t36, t38, t40, t54, t57, t58, t62, t65, t73, t91, t9...256
(forward)formula 0,0,8.34165,268768,1,0,522,1.45559e+06,222,216,2675,1.86435e+06,602
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 102 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 102 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 102 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 99 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 99 transition count 95
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /112 variables (removed 13) and now considering 95/110 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 99 cols
[2025-05-30 16:12:02] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:12:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:12:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/194 variables, 99/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 194/194 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 4015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 9/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 95/194 variables, 99/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 94/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 194/194 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 15516 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 19538ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19538ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/112 places, 95/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19666 ms. Remains : 99/112 places, 95/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16398812146448409684.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16700462072360219721.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16398812146448409684.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16700462072360219721.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.10969e+07,0.095133,8572,2,2979,5,17620,6,0,493,25751,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((A((p34==1) U (((p42==1)&&(p93==1))&&(p29==0))) * ((AX(((p47==0)&&(p76==1))) + EG((p2==1))) + (EG(((p29==0)||(p30==1))) * (((p78==0...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((((p42==1)&&(p93==1))&&(p29==0))) U (!((p34==1)) * !((((p42==1)&&(p93==1))&&(p...338
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t11, t19, t24, t32, t36, t38, t41, t49, t54, t56, t62, t63, t66, t72, t89, t9...261
(forward)formula 0,0,27.7676,750456,1,0,1376,4.19887e+06,237,636,2960,5.48748e+06,1590
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 104 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 104 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 104 transition count 101
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 99 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 99 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 98 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 98 transition count 95
Applied a total of 29 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /112 variables (removed 14) and now considering 95/110 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 98 cols
[2025-05-30 16:12:50] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:12:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:12:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 13/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 95/193 variables, 98/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/193 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 193/193 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 4486 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/193 variables, 98/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 94/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 2/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 3/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/193 variables, 2/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 2/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/193 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 193/193 variables, and 232 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 20358 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 24849ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24850ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/112 places, 95/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24958 ms. Remains : 98/112 places, 95/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1545256694851025407.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1374309636151971810.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1545256694851025407.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1374309636151971810.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.73787e+07,0.110201,9468,2,3721,5,22162,6,0,489,30492,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AX(AF(AG(((p8==0)||(p25==1))))) * (((p20==0)&&(p103==1)) + (EG(((p10==0)||((p51==0)&&(p83==1)))) * EG(((p36==0)||(p7==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p8==0)||(p25==1)))))))] = FALSE * ([((EY(Init) * !(((p20==0)&&(p103==1)))) ...289
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t11, t20, t23, t26, t29, t34, t38, t40, t41, t52, t55, t56, t60, t63, t70, t7...271
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15342988037639759225.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15342988037639759225.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15342988037639759225.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15342988037639759225.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15342988037639759225.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6330316987578550286.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5292366410051164673.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6330316987578550286.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5292366410051164673.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.73787e+07,0.030921,5212,316,22,2608,182,289,3030,44,433,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AX(AF(AG(((i2.u5.p8==0)||(i3.u7.p25==1))))) * (((i3.u8.p20==0)&&(i10.i0.u35.p103==1)) + (EG(((i2.u5.p10==0)||((i5.u14.p51==0)&&(i0.i1...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u5.p8==0)||(i3.u7.p25==1)))))))] = FALSE * ([((EY(Init) * !(((i3.u8.p20=...371
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t60, t89, t90, t91, i0.i1.t26, i0.i1.u29.t29, i0.i2.u39.t11, i1.t38, i1.i1.t40, i2.t75, ...380
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,0,2.57871,125788,1,0,289230,233,1703,284682,215,532,364543
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 110/110 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 101 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 101 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 101 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 97 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 97 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 96 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 96 transition count 92
Applied a total of 34 rules in 2 ms. Remains 96 /112 variables (removed 16) and now considering 92/110 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 96 cols
[2025-05-30 16:13:48] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 16:13:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:13:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/96 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 9/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/188 variables, 96/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 3/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 188/188 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 4760 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/96 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 14/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/188 variables, 96/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 91/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 4/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 3/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 4/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 188/188 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 21897 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 26671ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26683ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/112 places, 92/110 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26791 ms. Remains : 96/112 places, 92/110 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15324266748558300895.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7319632727265070176.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15324266748558300895.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7319632727265070176.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.9428e+07,0.103028,7920,2,2910,5,15454,6,0,478,21117,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A((((p47==0)||(p109==1)) * ((p58!=0) + AX((((p36==0)||(p100==0))||(p28==1))))) U AF(!(((p42==1)||(p41==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(!(((p42==1)||(p41==0)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(!(((p42==1)||(p41==0))))))) U (!((((p4...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t11, t19, t24, t32, t36, t38, t41, t49, t51, t54, t55, t59, t61, t63, t66, t69, t86, ...263
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,22.72,706844,1,0,1281,4.22518e+06,216,697,2716,5.12026e+06,1396
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-05-30 16:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-30 16:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 353609 ms.

BK_STOP 1748621678018

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-01b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-01b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853729300449"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-01b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-01b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;