Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853728700170.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Anderson-PT-07, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853728700170
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 868K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 461K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748542319965

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Anderson-PT-07
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 100 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Transformed 309 places.
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Transformed 917 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 309 places and 917 transitions and 3500 arcs in 192 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 83 out of 309 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 917/917 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 267 transition count 803
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 267 transition count 803
Applied a total of 84 rules in 67 ms. Remains 267 /309 variables (removed 42) and now considering 803/917 (removed 114) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 803 rows 267 cols
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 27 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 356 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:12:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:12:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1186 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1574 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 796 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:12:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:12:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 205 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 171 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 166 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 169 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 174 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 193 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 175 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 157 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 164 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 160 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 163 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 170 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 169 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 161 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 169 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 171 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 144 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 172 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 182 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 166 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 164 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 171 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 175 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 174 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 171 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 184 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 174 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 175 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 173 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 163 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 161 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 166 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 170 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 170 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 184 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 168 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 157 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 169 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 168 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 178 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 168 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 168 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 267/1070 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved in 30038 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 0/267 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 796/796 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 42/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 194 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 176 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 168 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 162 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 172 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 171 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 176 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 7/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 159 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 162 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 170 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 172 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 4/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 167 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 172 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 2/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 187 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 173 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 188 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 267/1070 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 0/267 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/796 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60763ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 796 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60779ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 267/309 places, 803/917 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62454 ms. Remains : 267/309 places, 803/917 transitions.
Support contains 83 out of 267 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 129 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 94 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 803 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2536 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 36/71 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 29/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 21/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 49 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 17/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 59 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 73 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 14/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 12/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 11/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
[2025-05-29 18:13:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:13:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 233/264 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/267 variables, 4/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 224 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 297 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 358 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 217 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 803/1070 variables, 267/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1070 variables, 42/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1070 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/1070 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1070/1070 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved in 3091 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 267/267 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/9 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 210/232 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/261 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 6/267 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 4/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 174 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 158 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/267 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 803/1070 variables, 267/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1070 variables, 42/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1070 variables, 7/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1070 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1070/1070 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved in 5010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 267/267 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/9 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8134ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 7 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 16 out of 267 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Performed 40 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 40 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 267 transition count 763
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 227 transition count 763
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 194 transition count 382
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 194 transition count 382
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 192 transition count 380
Applied a total of 150 rules in 65 ms. Remains 192 /267 variables (removed 75) and now considering 380/803 (removed 423) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 66 ms. Remains : 192/267 places, 380/803 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 341 ms. (116 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 229 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 219 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 2/7 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 380 rows 192 cols
[2025-05-29 18:13:14] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 175/180 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/185 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 7/192 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 380/572 variables, 192/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 42/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/572 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 572/572 variables, and 251 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 336 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 192/192 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 175/180 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/185 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 7/192 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 380/572 variables, 192/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 42/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/572 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 572/572 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 661 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 192/192 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 138 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 192 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 192/192 places, 380/380 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 186 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 186 transition count 302
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 185 transition count 301
Applied a total of 14 rules in 22 ms. Remains 185 /192 variables (removed 7) and now considering 301/380 (removed 79) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 34 ms. Remains : 185/192 places, 301/380 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 113 ms. (350 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 114 ms. (347 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 62 ms. (634 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 163456 steps, run visited all 2 properties in 666 ms. (steps per millisecond=245 )
Probabilistic random walk after 163456 steps, saw 100660 distinct states, run finished after 670 ms. (steps per millisecond=243 ) properties seen :2
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-05-29 18:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 81 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 803 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 267 transition count 761
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 225 transition count 761
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 189 transition count 365
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 189 transition count 365
Applied a total of 156 rules in 46 ms. Remains 189 /267 variables (removed 78) and now considering 365/803 (removed 438) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 365 rows 189 cols
[2025-05-29 18:13:16] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 474 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 476 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/267 places, 365/803 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 30 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 30 transitions
Performed 30 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 30
Iterating post reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 188 transition count 335
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 158 transition count 328
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 151 transition count 328
Applied a total of 74 rules in 19 ms. Remains 151 /188 variables (removed 37) and now considering 328/365 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 328 rows 151 cols
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 392 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 495 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 151/267 places, 328/803 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1054 ms. Remains : 151/267 places, 328/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 328 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13236193880794185554.gal : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11202084077536785930.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13236193880794185554.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11202084077536785930.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,810344,6.64308,225908,2,44673,5,610025,6,0,935,410729,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:13:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:13:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4896114985191494306.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4896114985191494306.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4896114985191494306.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4896114985191494306.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4896114985191494306.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:13:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:13:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:13:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 549 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 126 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:13:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability950352913728327148.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2828720843731092281.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability950352913728327148.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2828720843731092281.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,810344,2.05403,83088,8545,364,150211,1868,869,136004,203,11012,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A((AG(((i3.u2.next_0==1)&&(i2.u20.ncs_0_5==1))) + (EF(((i3.u5.next_6==1)&&(i1.u3.ncs_2_3==1))) * (((i4.u7.next_11==1)&&(i1.u3.ncs_2_1=...404
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u1.slot_F.F.T.F.F.F.F==1)&&(i0.u1.p3_3_2==1))))) + !(EG(!((...1295
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t225, t227, t228, t230, t231, t234, t235, t236, t237, t240, t241, t245, t246, t247, t249, t25...456
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,16.6754,516624,1,0,950477,26939,3831,943243,769,199709,4835585
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 267 transition count 762
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 762
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 185 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 185 transition count 289
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 184 transition count 288
Applied a total of 166 rules in 26 ms. Remains 184 /267 variables (removed 83) and now considering 288/803 (removed 515) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 288 rows 184 cols
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 484 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 488 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 183/267 places, 288/803 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 183 transition count 239
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 134 transition count 239
Applied a total of 98 rules in 31 ms. Remains 134 /183 variables (removed 49) and now considering 239/288 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 134 cols
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 221 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 267 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 492 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 134/267 places, 239/803 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1037 ms. Remains : 134/267 places, 239/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 239 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 197 ms. (202 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14832285921042091792.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8840315774077252017.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14832285921042091792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8840315774077252017.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8840315774077252017.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 9
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :9 after 19
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :19 after 43
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :43 after 108
Finished probabilistic random walk after 99496 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 186 ms. (steps per millisecond=534 )
Probabilistic random walk after 99496 steps, saw 60460 distinct states, run finished after 186 ms. (steps per millisecond=534 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 227 transition count 355
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 227 transition count 355
Applied a total of 80 rules in 6 ms. Remains 227 /267 variables (removed 40) and now considering 355/803 (removed 448) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 355 rows 227 cols
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 356 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 358 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 226/267 places, 355/803 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 226 /226 variables (removed 0) and now considering 355/355 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 366 ms. Remains : 226/267 places, 355/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 355 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1397100005673286431.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6220869132095007077.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1397100005673286431.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6220869132095007077.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71066e+07,10.0169,320532,2,98846,5,967756,6,0,1262,969815,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2713424401098275072.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2713424401098275072.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2713424401098275072.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2713424401098275072.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2713424401098275072.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 585 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14736065334072347212.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5044715993259471568.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14736065334072347212.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5044715993259471568.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71066e+07,2.24188,70584,11361,23,133755,205,922,85967,35,301,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(EX((((i0.u1.next_2==1)&&(i4.u40.ncs_0_1==1))&&((i0.u6.next_12==0)||(i1.u17.ncs_2_2==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(EX((((i0.u1.next_2==1)&&(i4.u40.ncs_0_1==1))&&((i0.u6.next_12==0)||(i1.u17.ncs_2_2==0))))))))]...164
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t306, t307, t308, t309, t310, t311, t312, t313, t314, t315, t316, t317, t318, t319, t320, t32...456
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 227 transition count 355
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 227 transition count 355
Applied a total of 80 rules in 10 ms. Remains 227 /267 variables (removed 40) and now considering 355/803 (removed 448) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 355 rows 227 cols
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 347 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 362 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 226/267 places, 355/803 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 226 /226 variables (removed 0) and now considering 355/355 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 376 ms. Remains : 226/267 places, 355/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 355 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6323043255186120533.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability648958478614545701.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6323043255186120533.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability648958478614545701.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71066e+07,9.52902,320508,2,100173,5,993764,6,0,1262,942814,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15838051396663339326.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15838051396663339326.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15838051396663339326.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15838051396663339326.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15838051396663339326.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 576 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 7 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12346625840693231817.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5455015712244268015.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12346625840693231817.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5455015712244268015.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71066e+07,2.60889,79748,11717,25,155829,187,983,113726,36,307,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AF((AG(((i0.i1.u5.next_12==1)&&(i10.u36.ncs_1_3==1))) + ((i0.i0.u3.next_8==1)&&(i3.u48.ncs_3_5==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.i1.u5.next_12==1)&&(i10.u36.ncs_1_3==1))))) + ((i0.i0.u3.next...199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t306, t307, t308, t309, t310, t311, t312, t313, t314, t315, t316, t317, t318, t319, t320, t32...465
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 267 transition count 762
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 762
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 184 transition count 288
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 184 transition count 288
Applied a total of 166 rules in 24 ms. Remains 184 /267 variables (removed 83) and now considering 288/803 (removed 515) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 288 rows 184 cols
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 284 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 286 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 183/267 places, 288/803 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 183 transition count 267
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 162 transition count 253
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 148 transition count 253
Applied a total of 70 rules in 12 ms. Remains 148 /183 variables (removed 35) and now considering 253/288 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 253 rows 148 cols
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 432 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 578 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 148/267 places, 253/803 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 900 ms. Remains : 148/267 places, 253/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 253 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11425296603951650521.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3113304897267948546.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11425296603951650521.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3113304897267948546.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,440311,2.48523,90860,2,36866,5,271873,6,0,848,180995,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(!(A(((slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.T==1)&&(p2_2_6==1)) U ((slot_F.F.F.T.F.F.F==1)&&(p2_1_3==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((slot_F.F.F.T.F.F.F==1)&&(p2_1_3==1))) U (!(((slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.T==1)&&(p2_2_6==1))...265
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t149, t150, t152, t154, t155, t157, t159, t160, t162, t164, t165, t167, t169, t170, t172, t17...456
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12835311977819806390.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12835311977819806390.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12835311977819806390.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12835311977819806390.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12835311977819806390.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 417 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 21 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7614349813199215895.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13951958271226148231.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7614349813199215895.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13951958271226148231.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,440311,1.41298,47904,4852,133,92750,561,759,72067,99,2045,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(!(A(((i4.u0.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.T==1)&&(i1.u27.p2_2_6==1)) U ((i5.u1.slot_F.F.F.T.F.F.F==1)&&(i2.i0.u25.p2_1_3==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((i5.u1.slot_F.F.F.T.F.F.F==1)&&(i2.i0.u25.p2_1_3==1))) U (!(((i4.u0.slot_F.F.F.F.F...326
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t149, t152, t157, t159, t160, t164, t165, t167, t169, t170, t172, t174, t175, t177, t179, t18...465
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,10.1657,274440,1,0,432349,3570,3710,446663,368,41669,2075189
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 225 transition count 329
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 225 transition count 329
Applied a total of 84 rules in 6 ms. Remains 225 /267 variables (removed 42) and now considering 329/803 (removed 474) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 329 rows 225 cols
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 388 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 394 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 224/267 places, 329/803 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 224 /224 variables (removed 0) and now considering 329/329 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 404 ms. Remains : 224/267 places, 329/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 329 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6978063876655656024.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15699074540709363962.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6978063876655656024.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15699074540709363962.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48907e+07,6.18973,195388,2,72164,5,616978,6,0,1228,512584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:17:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:17:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5821720439304711089.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5821720439304711089.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5821720439304711089.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5821720439304711089.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5821720439304711089.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:17:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:17:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:17:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 506 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:17:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 7 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:17:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15554768030161801004.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17339702272904313831.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15554768030161801004.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17339702272904313831.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48907e+07,2.55648,89088,13272,24,179894,202,964,97252,36,339,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(EF(EG(AX(((i0.i1.u2.next_10==1)&&(i0.i1.u62.p1_6_6==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(EX(!(((i0.i1.u2.next_10==1)&&(i0.i1.u62.p1_6_6==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t280, t281, t282, t283, t284, t285, t286, t287, t288, t289, t290, t291, t292, t293, t294, t29...456
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,0,17.8658,565704,1,0,1.05013e+06,216,4838,808850,170,1103,5980047
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 231 transition count 383
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 231 transition count 383
Applied a total of 72 rules in 19 ms. Remains 231 /267 variables (removed 36) and now considering 383/803 (removed 420) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 383 rows 231 cols
[2025-05-29 18:17:38] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 194 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 230/267 places, 383/803 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 230 /230 variables (removed 0) and now considering 383/383 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 216 ms. Remains : 230/267 places, 383/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:17:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 383 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:17:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13993415902646735966.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3591979711506668686.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13993415902646735966.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3591979711506668686.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.15679e+07,16.5001,478936,2,124372,5,1.40807e+06,6,0,1306,1.50715e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18340787200803781756.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18340787200803781756.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18340787200803781756.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18340787200803781756.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18340787200803781756.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 645 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3834112266743575578.gal : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5373978851019022901.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3834112266743575578.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5373978851019022901.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.15679e+07,4.41281,109664,9396,27,208435,214,994,157491,39,404,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((!(E((((i0.u2.next_7==1)&&(i4.u20.ncs_4_3==1))||(i4.u24.p1_4_12==1)) U A((i1.u42.p1_2_9==1) U ((i0.u1.next_5==1)&&(i2.u47.ncs_3_2==...317
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((!(E((((i0.u2.next_7==1)&&(i4.u20.ncs_4_3==1))||(i4.u24.p1_4_12==1)) U !((E(!(((i0.u1.next_5...483
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t19, t58, t71, t78, t79, t84, t85, t86, t334, t335, t336, t337, t338, t339, t340, t341, t...764
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,24.7629,659780,1,0,1.22999e+06,249,5842,1.08842e+06,201,779,6545703
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 235 transition count 447
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 235 transition count 447
Applied a total of 64 rules in 5 ms. Remains 235 /267 variables (removed 32) and now considering 447/803 (removed 356) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 447 rows 235 cols
[2025-05-29 18:18:33] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:18:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:18:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 913 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 440 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:18:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:18:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 139 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 130 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 150 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 130 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 120 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 130 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 128 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 249 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 132 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 130 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 206 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 145 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 128 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 130 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 159 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 113 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 138 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 157 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 139 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 17/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 135 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 128 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30175ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 440 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30177ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/267 places, 447/803 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31342 ms. Remains : 235/267 places, 447/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 447 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6319090285433052054.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2447197743934447008.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6319090285433052054.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2447197743934447008.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:19:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:19:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9907644695845486420.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9907644695845486420.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9907644695845486420.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9907644695845486420.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9907644695845486420.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:19:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:19:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:19:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 735 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:19:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 66 labels/synchronizations in 23 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:19:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6732338905425360927.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11440141059498830506.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6732338905425360927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11440141059498830506.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.90078e+07,10.3904,212200,6796,5073,373860,13131,1123,480048,542,13307,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 226 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 342
Applied a total of 82 rules in 13 ms. Remains 226 /267 variables (removed 41) and now considering 342/803 (removed 461) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 342 rows 226 cols
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 195 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 222 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 225/267 places, 342/803 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 225 /225 variables (removed 0) and now considering 342/342 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 237 ms. Remains : 225/267 places, 342/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 342 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14991445578593318483.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability842757763498091576.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14991445578593318483.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability842757763498091576.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59543e+07,8.57422,274092,2,95485,5,881777,6,0,1245,846707,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10248194345159658697.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10248194345159658697.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10248194345159658697.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10248194345159658697.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10248194345159658697.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 546 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15242357136633646099.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10240517674271883604.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15242357136633646099.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10240517674271883604.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59543e+07,3.03223,94124,11035,26,182292,233,891,119516,36,343,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(AX(((i0.u2.next_5==1)&&(i4.u37.ncs_2_3==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EX(!(((i0.u2.next_5==1)&&(i4.u37.ncs_2_3==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t293, t294, t295, t296, t297, t298, t299, t300, t301, t302, t303, t304, t305, t306, t307, t30...456
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 226 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 342
Applied a total of 82 rules in 11 ms. Remains 226 /267 variables (removed 41) and now considering 342/803 (removed 461) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 342 rows 226 cols
[2025-05-29 18:21:05] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 196 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 225/267 places, 342/803 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 225 /225 variables (removed 0) and now considering 342/342 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 213 ms. Remains : 225/267 places, 342/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 342 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability723770527873488059.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17071744507502003642.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability723770527873488059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17071744507502003642.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59543e+07,8.28859,267220,2,95330,5,857765,6,0,1245,811614,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((next_8==1)&&(ncs_0_3==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * ((next_8==1)&&(ncs_0_3==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,11.1373,267220,1,0,7,857765,8,1,2258,811614,2
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 267 transition count 761
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 225 transition count 761
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 184 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 184 transition count 300
Applied a total of 166 rules in 21 ms. Remains 184 /267 variables (removed 83) and now considering 300/803 (removed 503) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 300 rows 184 cols
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 169 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 183/267 places, 300/803 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 183 transition count 252
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 135 transition count 252
Applied a total of 96 rules in 6 ms. Remains 135 /183 variables (removed 48) and now considering 252/300 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 252 rows 135 cols
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 299 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 395 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 135/267 places, 252/803 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 592 ms. Remains : 135/267 places, 252/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 252 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 3178 steps (0 resets) in 14 ms. (211 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8571664489786824254.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2423974881160385734.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8571664489786824254.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2423974881160385734.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 234 transition count 446
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 234 transition count 446
Applied a total of 66 rules in 8 ms. Remains 234 /267 variables (removed 33) and now considering 446/803 (removed 357) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 446 rows 234 cols
[2025-05-29 18:21:17] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:21:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:21:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 999 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1175 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 439 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:21:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:21:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 130 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 127 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 114 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 127 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 116 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 116 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 128 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 132 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 130 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 127 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 9/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 119 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 137 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 446/680 variables, 234/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/680 variables, 42/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 130 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 119 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 680/680 variables, and 329 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 234/234 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 439/439 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 36/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 123 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 115 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 121 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 109 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 234/680 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/234 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/439 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60152ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 439 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60154ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/267 places, 446/803 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61340 ms. Remains : 234/267 places, 446/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 446 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4002153099560628822.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8673027645132190777.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4002153099560628822.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8673027645132190777.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8008476501863785417.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8008476501863785417.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8008476501863785417.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8008476501863785417.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8008476501863785417.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 754 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 70 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8919927843077030611.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6047979177012620428.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8919927843077030611.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6047979177012620428.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.80249e+07,7.10434,177360,10972,5073,353573,25402,1033,265820,538,31301,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i4.i1.u7.next_12==1)&&(i2.u22.ncs_4_1==1)) U E((((EG(((i1.u2.next_3==1)&&(i2.u23.ncs_4_5==1))) + AG(((i4.i0.u4.next_6==1)&&(i1.u55.nc...664
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((((EG(((i1.u2.next_3==1)&&(i2.u23.ncs_4_5==1))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((i4.i0.u4.next_6==1)&&(i1.u55...1969
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t405, t410, t411, t412, t414, t420, t421, t426, t430, t431, t432, t434, t437, t438, t439, t44...354
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 228 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 228 transition count 368
Applied a total of 78 rules in 23 ms. Remains 228 /267 variables (removed 39) and now considering 368/803 (removed 435) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 228 cols
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 195 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 211 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/267 places, 368/803 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 368/368 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 237 ms. Remains : 227/267 places, 368/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9996270597234526351.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5974214330093860235.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9996270597234526351.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5974214330093860235.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82588e+07,11.9565,342568,2,103172,5,1.0561e+06,6,0,1279,1.01182e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15214258794143668620.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15214258794143668620.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15214258794143668620.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15214258794143668620.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15214258794143668620.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 624 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1344651572816112421.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17355333366347622071.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1344651572816112421.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17355333366347622071.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82588e+07,2.12307,65008,11485,25,124379,163,1018,99868,35,292,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((EX(((i5.i1.u61.slot_F.T.F.F.F.F.F==0)||(i0.i1.u57.p2_6_1==0))) + !(A(((i0.i1.u1.next_4==1)&&(i7.u63.ncs_0_6==1)) U ((i0.i0.u0.nex...306
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((EX(((i5.i1.u61.slot_F.T.F.F.F.F.F==0)||(i0.i1.u57.p2_6_1==0))) + !(!((E(!(((i0.i0.u0....481
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t319, t320, t321, t322, t323, t324, t325, t326, t327, t328, t329, t330, t331, t332, t333, t33...462
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 267 transition count 762
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 226 transition count 762
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 189 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 189 transition count 341
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 188 transition count 340
Applied a total of 158 rules in 32 ms. Remains 188 /267 variables (removed 79) and now considering 340/803 (removed 463) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 340 rows 188 cols
[2025-05-29 18:24:20] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 366 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 376 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/267 places, 340/803 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 45 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 45 transitions
Performed 45 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 45
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 187 transition count 295
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 142 transition count 295
Applied a total of 90 rules in 6 ms. Remains 142 /187 variables (removed 45) and now considering 295/340 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 142 cols
[2025-05-29 18:24:20] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:24:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:24:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 443 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 549 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 142/267 places, 295/803 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 964 ms. Remains : 142/267 places, 295/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:24:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3297684494869227543.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3428998691771152695.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3297684494869227543.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3428998691771152695.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,640884,5.20353,163884,2,41438,5,461319,6,0,866,317355,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(E(((next_3==1)&&(ncs_3_0==1)) U (E((p1_5_5==1) U ((next_7==1)&&(p1_4_6==1))) * (((next_7==1)&&(ncs_0_6==1))||((next_2==1)&&(ncs_6_4...200
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((next_2==1)&&(ncs_6_0==1))))),((next_3==1)&&(ncs_3_0==1))) * (((next...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t148, t155, t162, t169, t176, t190, t191, t200, t201, t202, t203, t204, t205, t207, t208, t20...498
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1351916688785887589.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1351916688785887589.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1351916688785887589.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1351916688785887589.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1351916688785887589.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 473 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 84 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15880412117368074892.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13086420174426136742.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15880412117368074892.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13086420174426136742.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,640884,3.60349,90572,6714,267,123436,963,822,446159,169,4677,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(E(((i1.u4.next_3==1)&&(i6.u24.ncs_3_0==1)) U (E((i4.u16.p1_5_5==1) U ((i2.u5.next_7==1)&&(i2.u14.p1_4_6==1))) * (((i2.u5.next_7==1)...266
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((i2.u3.next_2==1)&&(i1.u4.ncs_6_0==1))))),((i1.u4.next_3==1)&&(i6.u2...325
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t162, t190, t200, t201, t202, t204, t205, t207, t211, t212, t213, t214, t215, t216, t217, t21...490
(forward)formula 0,1,20.7784,330616,1,0,466946,16935,3303,1.44042e+06,674,109999,2081009
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 232 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 232 transition count 408
Applied a total of 70 rules in 13 ms. Remains 232 /267 variables (removed 35) and now considering 408/803 (removed 395) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 408 rows 232 cols
[2025-05-29 18:25:12] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:25:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:25:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 878 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1053 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 401 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:25:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:25:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 116 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 125 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 111 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 149 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 136 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 18/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 102 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 110 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 143 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 232/640 variables, and 48 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/232 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 401/401 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 31/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 107 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 232/640 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/232 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/401 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60119ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 401 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60121ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/267 places, 408/803 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61189 ms. Remains : 232/267 places, 408/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 408 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4097255499412659672.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13850065188386303122.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4097255499412659672.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13850065188386303122.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10978927132240268552.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10978927132240268552.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10978927132240268552.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10978927132240268552.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10978927132240268552.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 621 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11563141861968243479.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5096024320276675132.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11563141861968243479.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5096024320276675132.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38374e+07,9.48847,242976,14802,7156,447882,20212,860,336023,504,25022,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG((((A(((i2.u5.next_11==1)&&(i3.u22.p1_3_6==1)) U ((i3.u3.next_5==1)&&(i7.u27.ncs_5_1==1))) + !(((i1.u4.next_7==1)&&(i6.u40.ncs_2_3==1...540
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U (((u0.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(u0.cs_1_6==1))&&(i11.u46.p1_3_11==1))) * ((!(...1106
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t40, t44, t45, t46, t47, t83, t84, t96, t122, t123, t130, t135, t136, t137, t148, t156, ...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 267/267 places, 803/803 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 228 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 228 transition count 368
Applied a total of 78 rules in 13 ms. Remains 228 /267 variables (removed 39) and now considering 368/803 (removed 435) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 228 cols
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 222 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/267 places, 368/803 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 368/368 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 237 ms. Remains : 227/267 places, 368/803 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 368 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6586638422674383372.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3407375946284697301.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6586638422674383372.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3407375946284697301.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83563e+07,9.80468,310872,2,74079,5,865672,6,0,1279,724983,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17146886680389532434.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17146886680389532434.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17146886680389532434.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17146886680389532434.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17146886680389532434.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:27:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:27:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:27:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 615 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 7 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:27:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4352844394567311351.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16248323198515532410.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4352844394567311351.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16248323198515532410.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83563e+07,3.56395,91416,9468,25,164874,213,951,110713,36,381,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EF((((i1.i1.u2.next_7==1)&&(i8.u78.ncs_1_6==1))||((i1.i1.u1.next_4==1)&&(i0.u55.ncs_5_0==1)))) + EG((AX(EF(((i1.i1.u4.next_10==1)&&(i...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((i1.i1.u4.next_10==1)&&(i4.u34.ncs_0_1==1)))))) * ((i1.i0.u3.next_9==0)||(i...295
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t319, t320, t321, t322, t323, t324, t325, t326, t327, t328, t329, t330, t331, t332, t333, t33...459
(forward)formula 0,1,17.4215,438204,1,0,803465,241,4832,716537,165,1000,4695053
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3997621599324619614.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3997621599324619614.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3997621599324619614.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3997621599324619614.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3997621599324619614.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1190 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 418 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8938985501136569432.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12196868410226398555.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8938985501136569432.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12196868410226398555.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.07031e+08,456.55,3989324,32209,10809,6.2265e+06,171337,1223,1.27306e+07,874,3.84558e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(EX((((i4.u1.next_2==1)&&(i3.u6.ncs_0_1==1))&&((i3.u8.next_12==0)||(u2.ncs_2_2==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(EX((((i4.u1.next_2==1)&&(i3.u6.ncs_0_1==1))&&((i3.u8.next_12==0)||(u2.ncs_2_2==0))))))))] != F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t17, t18, t19, t27, t29, t39, t46, t73, t80, t91, t92, t93, t94, t95, t96, t97, t98, t99, t10...2158
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-29 18:38:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:38:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 18:38:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:38:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:38:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 979 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:38:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2025-05-29 18:38:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 349 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:38:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11763566954020974003.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:38:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3945494901926736821.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11763566954020974003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3945494901926736821.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.07031e+08,10.0216,265284,8585,4742,381168,6672,654,591141,506,273898,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(EX((((u8.next_2==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_1==1))&&((u8.next_12==0)||(u6.ncs_2_2==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(EX((((u8.next_2==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_1==1))&&((u8.next_12==0)||(u6.ncs_2_2==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t17, t24, t27, t28, t35, t46, t58, t70, t107, t108, t109, t118, t119, t124, t126, t149, ...970
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,23.9223,501000,1,0,569738,444799,2761,710381,2108,2.46494e+06,2701518
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EX(AF((AG(((u8.next_12==1)&&(u5.ncs_1_3==1))) + ((u8.next_8==1)&&(u7.ncs_3_5==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(((u8.next_12==1)&&(u5.ncs_1_3==1))))) + ((u8.next_8==1)&&(u7.ncs_3...178
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,25.4626,537096,1,0,612770,446177,3022,767655,2162,2.46908e+06,2977031
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E((EX((AF((((u8.next_7==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_5==1))||((u8.next_12==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_5==1)))) + EX(((u8.next_7==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_0==1))))) * EX(((A(((u...569
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,(EX((!(EG(!((((u8.next_7==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_5==1))||((u8.next_12==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_5==1)))))) + EX(((...1241
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,1,633.799,13398228,1,0,1.94629e+07,447098,3152,3.80695e+07,2217,2.65714e+06,57220475
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(EX(AX(((u8.next_5==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_3==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(EX(!(((u8.next_5==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_3==1))))))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 3,0,743.085,13440340,1,0,1.95271e+07,447528,2060,3.81678e+07,1314,2.65865e+06,1739036
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(((u8.next_12==1)&&(u1.ncs_4_1==1)) U E((((EG(((u8.next_3==1)&&(u1.ncs_4_5==1))) + AG(((u8.next_6==1)&&(u3.ncs_6_3==1)))) + (EG(((u8.nex...557
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((((EG(((u8.next_3==1)&&(u1.ncs_4_5==1))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((u8.next_6==1)&&(u3.ncs_6_3==1))))))...1668
(forward)formula 4,0,744.897,13440340,1,0,1.95271e+07,447528,2786,3.81678e+07,1578,2.65865e+06,2464732
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EX(((EX(((u9.slot_F.T.F.F.F.F.F==0)||(u3.p2_6_1==0))) + !(A(((u8.next_4==1)&&(u4.ncs_0_6==1)) U ((u8.next_2==1)&&(u3.ncs_6_1==1))))) +...242
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((EX(((u9.slot_F.T.F.F.F.F.F==0)||(u3.p2_6_1==0))) + !(!((E(!(((u8.next_2==1)&&(u3.ncs_...391
(forward)formula 5,1,746.088,13440340,1,0,1.95271e+07,447528,2911,3.81678e+07,1584,2.65865e+06,2826414
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(EG((((A(((u8.next_11==1)&&(u7.p1_3_6==1)) U ((u8.next_5==1)&&(u2.ncs_5_1==1))) + !(((u8.next_7==1)&&(u6.ncs_2_3==1)))) + (EX(((u9.slot_...481
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U (((u9.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.F==1)&&(u5.cs_1_6==1))&&(u7.p1_3_11==1))) * ((!((u9.s...1009
(forward)formula 6,1,750.806,13440340,1,0,1.95271e+07,447528,2943,3.81678e+07,1587,2.65865e+06,4341566
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 2347552 ms.

BK_STOP 1748544668774

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Anderson-PT-07"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Anderson-PT-07, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853728700170"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Anderson-PT-07.tgz
mv Anderson-PT-07 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;