Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853728700169.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Anderson-PT-07, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853728700169
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 868K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 461K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748542244179

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Anderson-PT-07
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 102 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Transformed 309 places.
[2025-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Transformed 917 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 309 places and 917 transitions and 3500 arcs in 198 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 12 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 78 out of 309 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 309/309 places, 917/917 transitions.
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 252 transition count 452
Iterating global reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 252 transition count 452
Applied a total of 114 rules in 58 ms. Remains 252 /309 variables (removed 57) and now considering 452/917 (removed 465) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 452 rows 252 cols
[2025-05-29 18:10:45] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 31 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 469 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 501 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 251/309 places, 452/917 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 251 /251 variables (removed 0) and now considering 452/452 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 586 ms. Remains : 251/309 places, 452/917 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 251 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 18:10:46] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
[2025-05-29 18:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:10:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 452 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 251 places (down from 78) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2173 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 9/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 216 ms. (184 steps per ms) remains 7/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 236 ms. (168 steps per ms) remains 5/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 128 ms. (310 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 197 ms. (202 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 452 rows 251 cols
[2025-05-29 18:10:47] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 127/133 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 28/161 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 76/237 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 14/251 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 452/703 variables, 251/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 42/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/703 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 703/703 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 490 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 251/251 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 127/133 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 28/161 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 76/237 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 14/251 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 452/703 variables, 251/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 42/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 5/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/703 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/703 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 703/703 variables, and 315 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 1227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 251/251 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1766ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1066 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 251 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 251 transition count 403
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 202 transition count 403
Performed 36 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 36 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 202 transition count 367
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 166 transition count 367
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 191 place count 145 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 145 transition count 250
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 139 transition count 244
Applied a total of 224 rules in 45 ms. Remains 139 /251 variables (removed 112) and now considering 244/452 (removed 208) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 139/251 places, 244/452 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 326 ms. (122 steps per ms) remains 3/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 139 cols
[2025-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 118/120 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/125 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 14/139 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 244/383 variables, 139/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 42/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/383 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 383/383 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 140 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 139/139 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 118/120 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/125 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 14/139 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 244/383 variables, 139/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 42/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/383 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 383/383 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 261 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 139/139 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 412ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 139 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 139/139 places, 244/244 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 135 transition count 240
Applied a total of 8 rules in 14 ms. Remains 135 /139 variables (removed 4) and now considering 240/244 (removed 4) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 14 ms. Remains : 135/139 places, 240/244 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 269 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 12065 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 77 ms. (steps per millisecond=156 )
Probabilistic random walk after 12065 steps, saw 8310 distinct states, run finished after 81 ms. (steps per millisecond=148 ) properties seen :1
[2025-05-29 18:10:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 452 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 229 transition count 334
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 229 transition count 334
Applied a total of 44 rules in 10 ms. Remains 229 /251 variables (removed 22) and now considering 334/452 (removed 118) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 334 rows 229 cols
[2025-05-29 18:10:51] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:10:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:10:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 829 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 985 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 327 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:10:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:10:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 135 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 334/563 variables, 229/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 42/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 136 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 1/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 563/563 variables, and 295 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved in 30053 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 229/229 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 327/327 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 6/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 229/563 variables, and 26 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/229 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/327 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60192ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60197ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/251 places, 334/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61197 ms. Remains : 229/251 places, 334/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 334 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality939833861609907564.gal : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:11:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13396537681902935726.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality939833861609907564.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13396537681902935726.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.85007e+07,14.3,399884,2,118828,5,1.20248e+06,6,0,1253,1.35048e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14777934705313373713.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14777934705313373713.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14777934705313373713.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14777934705313373713.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14777934705313373713.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 500 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 192 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 24 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8270893313723209636.gal : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7689110582191023957.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8270893313723209636.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7689110582191023957.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.85007e+07,7.15979,164544,21240,27,305396,200,929,343101,39,409,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((EX((i0.i1.u20.p1_3_6==1)) + !(AX((i0.i1.u20.p1_3_6==1)))) + ((EF((i9.u54.p1_5_11==1)) * AF((i9.u97.p3_5_0==0))) * ((i9.u53.p1_5_2==0)...434
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((EX((i0.i1.u20.p1_3_6==1)) + !(!(EX(!((i0.i1.u20.p1_3_6==1)))))) + ((E(TRUE U (i9.u54.p1_5_11==1)) ...746
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t285, t286, t287, t288, t289, t290, t291, t292, t293, t294, t295, t296, t297, t298, t299, t30...843
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 224 transition count 329
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 224 transition count 329
Applied a total of 54 rules in 11 ms. Remains 224 /251 variables (removed 27) and now considering 329/452 (removed 123) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 329 rows 224 cols
[2025-05-29 18:12:53] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 468 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:12:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:12:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 873 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1343 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 322 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:12:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:12:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 140 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/224 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 329/553 variables, 224/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 42/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/553 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 553/553 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 224/224 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 322/322 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/224 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 4/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 329/553 variables, 224/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60107ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60109ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 224/251 places, 329/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61468 ms. Remains : 224/251 places, 329/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 329 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:13:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7319385299484000732.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:13:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2973849059189244469.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7319385299484000732.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2973849059189244469.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48907e+07,6.06216,195080,2,72164,5,616978,6,0,1228,512584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7207976474970087402.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7207976474970087402.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7207976474970087402.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7207976474970087402.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7207976474970087402.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 489 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2115588612824972922.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality770232650350740299.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2115588612824972922.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality770232650350740299.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48907e+07,2.85722,91376,11354,27,214091,227,875,124821,39,419,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(EF((i9.i0.u63.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.T==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(E(TRUE U (i9.i0.u63.slot_F.F.F.F.F.F.T==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t280, t281, t283, t284, t285, t286, t287, t288, t289, t290, t291, t292, t293, t294, t295, t29...471
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,1,18.8799,516040,1,0,1.06019e+06,284,4901,943755,181,1275,4542798
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 251 transition count 404
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 203 transition count 404
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 203 transition count 362
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 161 transition count 362
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 207 place count 134 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 134 transition count 239
Applied a total of 234 rules in 20 ms. Remains 134 /251 variables (removed 117) and now considering 239/452 (removed 213) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 134 cols
[2025-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 317 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 425 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 9 ms returned []
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:14:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 239/373 variables, 134/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 42/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 2/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/373 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 373/373 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 13865 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 5/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 239/373 variables, 134/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 42/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 232/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 373/373 variables, and 430 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43952ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43953ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/251 places, 239/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44420 ms. Remains : 134/251 places, 239/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 239 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9766372200252589093.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2341546049627992597.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9766372200252589093.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2341546049627992597.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,344453,3.08421,84580,2,30885,5,242629,6,0,778,183811,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((cs_3_6==1) U AG(((p2_6_6==0)||(p1_2_6==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p2_6_6==0)||(p1_2_6==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p2_6_6==0)||(p1_2_6==1)))...238
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t147, t148, t149, t150, t151, t152, t153, t154, t155, t156, t157, t158, t159, t160, t161, t16...456
(forward)formula 0,0,28.1998,719644,1,0,549,3.82579e+06,502,256,6478,1.32351e+06,527
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 251 transition count 417
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 216 transition count 411
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 210 transition count 411
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 210 transition count 369
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 168 transition count 369
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 142 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 142 transition count 259
Applied a total of 218 rules in 43 ms. Remains 142 /251 variables (removed 109) and now considering 259/452 (removed 193) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 259 rows 142 cols
[2025-05-29 18:15:57] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 220 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:15:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:15:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 266 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 488 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 252 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:15:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:15:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 117 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 259/401 variables, 142/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 42/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/401 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 401/401 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 12951 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 9/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 259/401 variables, 142/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 42/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 252/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 401/401 variables, and 461 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43014ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43016ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/251 places, 259/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43568 ms. Remains : 142/251 places, 259/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 259 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5371630649848768094.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3123226130432437717.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5371630649848768094.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3123226130432437717.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,417715,3.71722,103176,2,35991,5,293121,6,0,830,210465,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((ncs_4_2==1) + EG(((cs_6_1==0)&&(slot_F.F.T.F.F.F.F==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (ncs_4_2==1))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((cs_6_1==0)&&(slot_F.F.T.F.F.F.F==1)))] !=...162
(forward)formula 0,1,3.73504,103176,1,0,7,293121,8,1,833,210465,1
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 42 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 42 transitions
Performed 42 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 42
Iterating post reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 251 transition count 410
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 209 transition count 408
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 207 transition count 408
Performed 38 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 38 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 207 transition count 370
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 169 transition count 370
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 146 transition count 287
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 146 transition count 287
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 145 transition count 286
Applied a total of 212 rules in 22 ms. Remains 145 /251 variables (removed 106) and now considering 286/452 (removed 166) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 286 rows 145 cols
[2025-05-29 18:16:44] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:16:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:16:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 360 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 521 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 279 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:16:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:16:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 8/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 5/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 286/431 variables, 145/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 42/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/431 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 431/431 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved in 12804 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 279/279 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 13/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 286/431 variables, 145/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 42/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/431 variables, 279/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 431/431 variables, and 495 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 279/279 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 42881ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42882ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/251 places, 286/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43436 ms. Remains : 145/251 places, 286/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:17:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 286 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:17:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7560281133305982696.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8349149503080266838.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7560281133305982696.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8349149503080266838.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,744878,4.7175,149960,2,43016,5,394915,6,0,869,288892,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF(((((cs_6_3==0)&&(p3_6_5==1))||(p2_5_5==0))||((p3_0_4==0)||(p1_6_10==1)))) + AF(((cs_5_1==0) + !(E(((p2_6_0==0)||(ncs_6_0==1)) U (...218
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U ((((cs_6_3==0)&&(p3_6_5==1))||(p2_5_5==0))||((p3_0_4==0)||(p1_6_10==1)))) + !(EG(!(((cs_5_...273
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t192, t193, t194, t195, t196, t197, t198, t199, t200, t201, t202, t203, t204, t205, t206, t20...456
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10007045895007572814.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10007045895007572814.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10007045895007572814.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10007045895007572814.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10007045895007572814.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 494 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 65 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15333664749077954994.gal : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 18:17:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9257595699001994688.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15333664749077954994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9257595699001994688.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,744878,1.38633,46428,4527,159,88541,491,756,71975,113,1843,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF(((((i0.u0.cs_6_3==0)&&(i0.u0.p3_6_5==1))||(i8.u27.p2_5_5==0))||((i5.u10.p3_0_4==0)||(i0.u28.p1_6_10==1)))) + AF(((i2.i0.u34.cs_5_...302
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U ((((i0.u0.cs_6_3==0)&&(i0.u0.p3_6_5==1))||(i8.u27.p2_5_5==0))||((i5.u10.p3_0_4==0)||(i0.u2...357
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t192, t193, t194, t195, t196, t197, t198, t199, t200, t201, t202, t203, t204, t208, t209, t21...480
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,11.551,375424,1,0,693436,5747,4073,656675,470,69758,3095972
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 225 transition count 342
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 225 transition count 342
Applied a total of 52 rules in 5 ms. Remains 225 /251 variables (removed 26) and now considering 342/452 (removed 110) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 342 rows 225 cols
[2025-05-29 18:18:10] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:18:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:18:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 724 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 922 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 335 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:18:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:18:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 4/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 342/567 variables, 225/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 42/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/567 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 567/567 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved in 28953 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 225/225 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 335/335 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 7/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 127 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 59033ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 335 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 225/251 places, 342/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59962 ms. Remains : 225/251 places, 342/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:19:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 342 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16657859532749542048.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7701453474013696836.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16657859532749542048.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7701453474013696836.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59543e+07,9.33532,284828,2,95137,5,898342,6,0,1245,883575,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16664422372350576872.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16664422372350576872.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16664422372350576872.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16664422372350576872.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16664422372350576872.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 540 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 7 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6955381292084440680.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:19:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18175265528330755068.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6955381292084440680.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18175265528330755068.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59543e+07,2.52205,77200,13023,24,153634,199,928,89984,36,295,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((EX((i8.i0.u96.p3_5_4==0)) + (i0.i1.u0.next_2==0)) + ((i0.i0.u63.p2_6_6==1)||((i2.u91.p3_3_2==1)&&(i1.u35.ncs_0_2==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((EX((i8.i0.u96.p3_5_4==0)) + (i0.i1.u0.next_2==0)) + ((i0.i0.u63.p2_6_6==1)||((i2.u91.p3_...197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t293, t294, t295, t296, t297, t298, t299, t300, t301, t302, t303, t304, t305, t306, t307, t30...462
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,19.62,572440,1,0,1.0392e+06,245,5278,879173,180,1040,6002357
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 224 transition count 329
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 224 transition count 329
Applied a total of 54 rules in 4 ms. Remains 224 /251 variables (removed 27) and now considering 329/452 (removed 123) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 329 rows 224 cols
[2025-05-29 18:20:00] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:20:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:20:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 716 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 910 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 322 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:20:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:20:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 102 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/224 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 329/553 variables, 224/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 42/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/553 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 553/553 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 224/224 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 322/322 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/224 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 4/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 329/553 variables, 224/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60083ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 322 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60084ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 224/251 places, 329/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60998 ms. Remains : 224/251 places, 329/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:21:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 329 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:21:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3537086910155165750.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4451206283374311978.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3537086910155165750.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4451206283374311978.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48907e+07,6.0278,195252,2,72164,5,616978,6,0,1228,512584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,6.05171,195252,1,0,6,616978,7,1,1770,512584,1
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 226 transition count 355
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 226 transition count 355
Applied a total of 50 rules in 8 ms. Remains 226 /251 variables (removed 25) and now considering 355/452 (removed 97) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 355 rows 226 cols
[2025-05-29 18:21:07] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 198 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:21:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:21:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 910 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 348 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:21:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:21:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 139 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 4/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 127 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 122 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 124 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 6/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 355/581 variables, 226/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/581 variables, 42/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/581 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/581 variables, 1/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/581 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 581/581 variables, and 295 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 226/226 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 348/348 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 11/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 355/581 variables, 226/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/581 variables, 42/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 581/581 variables, and 643 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved in 30047 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 226/226 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 348/348 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 348 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60136ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 226/251 places, 355/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61264 ms. Remains : 226/251 places, 355/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 355 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9327878823715012403.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8473856881352440767.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9327878823715012403.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8473856881352440767.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.70179e+07,12.7756,307724,2,100635,5,981462,6,0,1262,931221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12060387224061450881.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12060387224061450881.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12060387224061450881.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12060387224061450881.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12060387224061450881.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 594 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 7 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3388361172772740656.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:22:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13394629330598644806.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3388361172772740656.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13394629330598644806.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.70179e+07,3.77537,112768,17676,27,233832,237,964,138466,36,395,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG((((i7.i1.u59.cs_6_1==0)||(i0.i1.u82.ncs_6_5==1))||(i3.u33.p2_0_4==1))) U EF(!((AG((i10.u38.p2_1_4!=0)) + AX((i0.i1.u81.ncs_6_3!=1)))...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(FwdU(Init,EG((((i7.i1.u59.cs_6_1==0)||(i0.i1.u82.ncs_6_5==1))||(i3.u33.p2_0_4==1)))),TRUE) * !(!(E(TR...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t306, t307, t308, t309, t310, t311, t312, t313, t314, t315, t316, t317, t318, t319, t320, t32...456
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 229 transition count 334
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 229 transition count 334
Applied a total of 44 rules in 14 ms. Remains 229 /251 variables (removed 22) and now considering 334/452 (removed 118) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 334 rows 229 cols
[2025-05-29 18:23:08] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 155 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:23:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:23:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 759 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 916 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 327 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:23:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:23:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 118 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 114 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 118 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 334/563 variables, 229/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 42/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/563 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 1.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 1.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 563/563 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 229/229 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 327/327 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/229 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 334/563 variables, 229/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60095ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 327 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60098ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/251 places, 334/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61030 ms. Remains : 229/251 places, 334/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 334 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1434071941239086363.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10841399991621699100.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1434071941239086363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10841399991621699100.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82606e+07,16.1967,380592,2,98241,5,1.1051e+06,6,0,1253,1.17328e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11183135864162283812.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11183135864162283812.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11183135864162283812.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11183135864162283812.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11183135864162283812.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 475 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 11 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4924693128437781379.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality184311031718933333.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4924693128437781379.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality184311031718933333.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82606e+07,4.23012,117804,16173,41,228844,223,905,162519,49,630,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(EX(AF(((i2.u11.p1_2_7==1)&&(i9.i0.u18.p1_3_1==0))))) + !(E(!(AG(((i0.i0.u59.p2_6_6==0)||(i9.i1.u33.cs_0_2==1)))) U (EF(((i2.u13.p1_2...338
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !((EG(EX(!(EG(!(((i2.u11.p1_2_7==1)&&(i9.i0.u18.p1_3_1==0))))))) + !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.i0.u5...760
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t285, t286, t287, t288, t289, t290, t291, t292, t293, t294, t295, t296, t297, t298, t299, t30...839
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 226 transition count 331
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 226 transition count 331
Applied a total of 50 rules in 5 ms. Remains 226 /251 variables (removed 25) and now considering 331/452 (removed 121) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 331 rows 226 cols
[2025-05-29 18:25:10] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:25:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:25:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 772 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 953 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 324 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:25:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:25:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 144 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 140 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 331/557 variables, 226/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/557 variables, 42/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/557 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/557 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 124 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/557 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 557/557 variables, and 293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 226/226 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 324/324 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/226 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 5/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 226/557 variables, and 25 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/226 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/324 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60092ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 324 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60092ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 226/251 places, 331/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61051 ms. Remains : 226/251 places, 331/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 331 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17956196452237720832.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18427226244094144158.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17956196452237720832.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18427226244094144158.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.63353e+07,8.33852,265872,2,81354,5,787256,6,0,1238,721257,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15671359411762954986.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15671359411762954986.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15671359411762954986.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15671359411762954986.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15671359411762954986.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 477 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 28 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12281937555183806099.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:26:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3958553340599358810.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12281937555183806099.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3958553340599358810.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.63353e+07,4.23734,112644,16989,28,229571,173,874,138883,43,333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(!(A(EF((i9.u24.p1_5_9==0)) U AF((i3.u49.p1_4_10==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((i3.u49.p1_4_10==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U (i9.u24.p1_5_9==0))) * !(!(EG(!((...233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t282, t283, t284, t285, t286, t287, t288, t289, t290, t291, t292, t293, t294, t295, t296, t29...588
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 251 transition count 406
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 205 transition count 404
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 203 transition count 404
Performed 42 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 42 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 203 transition count 362
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 161 transition count 362
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 135 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 135 transition count 252
Applied a total of 232 rules in 26 ms. Remains 135 /251 variables (removed 116) and now considering 252/452 (removed 200) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 252 rows 135 cols
[2025-05-29 18:27:11] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:27:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:27:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 270 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 405 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 245 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:27:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 252/387 variables, 135/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 42/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved in 14495 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 245/245 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 7/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 252/387 variables, 135/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 42/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 245/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 445 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 245/245 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 44551ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 245 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44552ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/251 places, 252/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44999 ms. Remains : 135/251 places, 252/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 252 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17190304559055188319.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:27:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3593501663951947928.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17190304559055188319.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3593501663951947928.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,389460,2.85001,105440,2,37590,5,297791,6,0,795,206849,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((((p3_1_0==0)||(ncs_6_6==0))||(p3_1_6==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((p3_1_0==0)||(ncs_6_6==0))||(p3_1_6==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 234/36/18
(forward)formula 0,1,14.9359,448672,1,0,7,2.02558e+06,20,1,4795,416165,8
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 251/251 places, 452/452 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 231 transition count 336
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 231 transition count 336
Applied a total of 40 rules in 9 ms. Remains 231 /251 variables (removed 20) and now considering 336/452 (removed 116) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 336 rows 231 cols
[2025-05-29 18:28:11] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:28:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:28:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 751 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 915 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 329 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:28:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:28:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 118 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 336/567 variables, 231/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 42/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/567 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 567/567 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, ReadFeed: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 329/329 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 231/567 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/231 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/329 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60090ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60092ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 231/251 places, 336/452 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61026 ms. Remains : 231/251 places, 336/452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 336 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8604819123388890177.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16515121522001110248.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8604819123388890177.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16515121522001110248.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.99785e+07,15.8987,427572,2,107650,5,1.21164e+06,6,0,1263,1.33906e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17972563224578635723.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17972563224578635723.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17972563224578635723.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17972563224578635723.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17972563224578635723.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 492 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 7 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13954681074228087977.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:29:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2517047546684856211.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13954681074228087977.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2517047546684856211.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.99785e+07,8.07869,200256,26977,27,418194,205,919,259701,38,382,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((((((!(AF((i1.u31.p1_0_10==1))) + !(EG((i5.u34.p1_1_9==1)))) * ((EF(((i10.u36.cs_2_1==0)||(i3.u52.p1_5_1==1))) + (i6.u81.cs_5_4!=1)) ...432
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!((((((!(!(EG(!((i1.u31.p1_0_10==1))))) + !(EG((i5.u34.p1_1_9==1)))) * ((E(TRUE U ((i10.u36.cs_2_1==...661
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t287, t288, t289, t290, t291, t292, t293, t294, t295, t296, t297, t298, t299, t300, t301, t30...880
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15535791084971520781.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15535791084971520781.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15535791084971520781.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15535791084971520781.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15535791084971520781.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 666 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12035275843459141207.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:30:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17169176483811314130.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12035275843459141207.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17169176483811314130.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.85696e+07,19.0691,354868,26836,523,579623,3663,1168,626653,171,18961,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((EX((i0.i0.u19.p1_3_6==1)) + !(AX((i0.i0.u19.p1_3_6==1)))) + ((EF((i8.u48.p1_5_11==1)) * AF((i8.u45.p3_5_0==0))) * ((i8.u24.p1_5_2==0)...440
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((EX((i0.i0.u19.p1_3_6==1)) + !(!(EX(!((i0.i0.u19.p1_3_6==1)))))) + ((E(TRUE U (i8.u48.p1_5_11==1)) ...752
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71,...1589
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-29 18:32:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:32:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:32:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 449 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 123 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:32:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14782847297208722293.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:32:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18254311440869179239.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14782847297208722293.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18254311440869179239.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.85696e+07,7.69289,198352,8812,2234,308111,3810,750,344354,444,70125,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((EX((u7.p1_3_6==1)) + !(AX((u7.p1_3_6==1)))) + ((EF((u2.p1_5_11==1)) * AF((u2.p3_5_0==0))) * ((u2.p1_5_2==0)||(u6.cs_2_3==1)))) U AX((...355
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((EX((u7.p1_3_6==1)) + !(!(EX(!((u7.p1_3_6==1)))))) + ((E(TRUE U (u2.p1_5_11==1)) * !(EG(!((u2.p3_5_...623
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t9, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t59, t61, t62, t...1120
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,73.3613,1877560,1,0,2.75568e+06,523868,4116,2.92499e+06,2018,2.97787e+06,12883403
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(EG((((u3.cs_6_1==0)||(u3.ncs_6_5==1))||(u4.p2_0_4==1))) U EF(!((AG((u5.p2_1_4!=0)) + AX((u3.ncs_6_3!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(FwdU(Init,EG((((u3.cs_6_1==0)||(u3.ncs_6_5==1))||(u4.p2_0_4==1)))),TRUE) * !(!(E(TRUE U !((u5.p2_1_4!...196
(forward)formula 1,1,137.071,2201456,1,0,3.2548e+06,528860,2333,3.40267e+06,1156,2.9921e+06,7232776
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: ((EG(EX(AF(((u6.p1_2_7==1)&&(u7.p1_3_1==0))))) + !(E(!(AG(((u3.p2_6_6==0)||(u4.cs_0_2==1)))) U (EF(((u6.p1_2_2==0)&&((u6.cs_2_4==0)||(u1....281
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !((EG(EX(!(EG(!(((u6.p1_2_7==1)&&(u7.p1_3_1==0))))))) + !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((u3.p2_6_6==0)||(u4....654
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,0,181.877,2335088,1,0,3.97437e+06,528860,3167,4.02762e+06,1360,2.9921e+06,17088171
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EX(!(A(EF((u2.p1_5_9==0)) U AF((u1.p1_4_10==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((u1.p1_4_10==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U (u2.p1_5_9==0))) * !(!(EG(!((u1.p1_4_...217
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-29 18:36:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 452 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:36:07] [INFO ] Transformed 251 places.
[2025-05-29 18:36:07] [INFO ] Transformed 452 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-05-29 18:36:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5956544650463529409.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:36:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9971465709639049197.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5956544650463529409.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9971465709639049197.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.85696e+07,384.067,8007596,2,466237,5,2.11506e+07,6,0,1459,2.27458e+07,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(!(A(EF((p1_5_9==0)) U AF((p1_4_10==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((p1_4_10==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U (p1_5_9==0))) * !(!(EG(!((p1_4_10==1))))...205
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t65, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71,...1377
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1555.32,15404032,1,0,1034,7.95307e+07,11,456,4642,2.80254e+07,6
FORMULA Anderson-PT-07-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Total runtime 3112665 ms.

BK_STOP 1748545358758

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Anderson-PT-07"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Anderson-PT-07, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853728700169"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Anderson-PT-07.tgz
mv Anderson-PT-07 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;