Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r002-tall-174853728700161.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Anderson-PT-06, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r002-tall-174853728700161
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 692K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 302K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748541582175

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Anderson-PT-06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-29 17:59:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-29 17:59:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-29 17:59:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 100 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:43] [INFO ] Transformed 229 places.
[2025-05-29 17:59:43] [INFO ] Transformed 600 transitions.
[2025-05-29 17:59:43] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-29 17:59:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 229 places and 600 transitions and 2280 arcs in 196 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 92 out of 229 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 229/229 places, 600/600 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 201 transition count 402
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 201 transition count 402
Applied a total of 56 rules in 34 ms. Remains 201 /229 variables (removed 28) and now considering 402/600 (removed 198) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 402 rows 201 cols
[2025-05-29 17:59:43] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 35 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 347 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 17:59:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 17:59:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 691 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1072 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 17:59:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 17:59:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 8/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 9/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 17:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 130 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 127 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 8/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 123 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 122 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 117 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 402/603 variables, 201/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 30/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 603/603 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30056 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 8/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 64/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 129 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 115 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 6/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 117 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 143 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 3/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 402/603 variables, 201/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60372ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60385ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 201/229 places, 402/600 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61514 ms. Remains : 201/229 places, 402/600 transitions.
Support contains 92 out of 201 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:45] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-29 18:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 402 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 201 places (down from 92) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1742 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 7/50 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 122 ms. (325 steps per ms) remains 4/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 122 ms. (325 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 164 ms. (242 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-05-29 18:00:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:00:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 152/163 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/188 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 13/201 variables, 8/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 402/603 variables, 201/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 30/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/603 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 603/603 variables, and 246 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 223 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 154/163 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/188 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 13/201 variables, 8/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 402/603 variables, 201/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 30/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/603 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 603/603 variables, and 247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 228 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 459ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 23 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 201 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 201 transition count 373
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 172 transition count 373
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 141 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 141 transition count 212
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 140 transition count 211
Applied a total of 122 rules in 43 ms. Remains 140 /201 variables (removed 61) and now considering 211/402 (removed 191) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 44 ms. Remains : 140/201 places, 211/402 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 233 ms. (170 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 4988 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 39 ms. (steps per millisecond=127 )
Probabilistic random walk after 4988 steps, saw 3549 distinct states, run finished after 42 ms. (steps per millisecond=118 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 402 transitions.
Support contains 48 out of 201 places (down from 53) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 201 transition count 374
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 173 transition count 374
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 143 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 143 transition count 224
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 142 transition count 223
Applied a total of 118 rules in 19 ms. Remains 142 /201 variables (removed 59) and now considering 223/402 (removed 179) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 142 cols
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 142 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 141/201 places, 223/402 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 141 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 107 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 106 transition count 188
Applied a total of 70 rules in 12 ms. Remains 106 /141 variables (removed 35) and now considering 188/223 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 106 cols
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 294 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 106/201 places, 188/402 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 467 ms. Remains : 106/201 places, 188/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 188 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7592424801780486512.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10944831156832727457.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7592424801780486512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10944831156832727457.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,57788,0.68227,31156,2,14005,5,91836,6,0,615,62711,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF((p2_4_3==1)) * ((EG(((ncs_2_4==0)&&(p3_4_4==1))) + (p2_3_5==0)) + (p1_5_0==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!((p2_4_3==1)))) * ((EG(((ncs_2_4==0)&&(p3_4_4==1))) + (p2_3_5==0)) + (p1_5_0==1)))))] = FALS...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t77, t78, t79, t80, t81, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t89, t90, t91, t92, t93, t95, t96, t97, t98...514
(forward)formula 0,0,10.9281,334348,1,0,657,1.65236e+06,410,326,5041,855549,641
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 170 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 170 transition count 241
Applied a total of 62 rules in 5 ms. Remains 170 /201 variables (removed 31) and now considering 241/402 (removed 161) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 170 cols
[2025-05-29 18:00:58] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 231 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 169/201 places, 241/402 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 169 /169 variables (removed 0) and now considering 241/241 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 241 ms. Remains : 169/201 places, 241/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3726154959298485779.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:00:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7458704250461451828.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3726154959298485779.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7458704250461451828.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,968261,1.55188,56288,2,27358,5,172770,6,0,920,139024,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(TRUE) * AX(EX((!(A((p1_3_9==1) U (p2_4_5==0))) + AG((p3_0_2==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(EX((!(!((E(!((p2_4_5==0)) U (!((p1_3_9==1)) * !((p2_4_5==0)))) ...222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t70, t71, t76, t77, t82, t83, t94, t95, t100, t101, t120, t205, t206, t207, t208, t209, t210,...436
(forward)formula 0,0,27.0146,822068,1,0,683,4.72238e+06,516,333,6673,1.65707e+06,749
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Performed 30 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 30 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 201 transition count 372
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 171 transition count 372
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 139 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 139 transition count 210
Applied a total of 124 rules in 15 ms. Remains 139 /201 variables (removed 62) and now considering 210/402 (removed 192) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 139 cols
[2025-05-29 18:01:26] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 605 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 606 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/201 places, 210/402 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 138 transition count 177
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 105 transition count 175
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 103 transition count 175
Applied a total of 70 rules in 9 ms. Remains 103 /138 variables (removed 35) and now considering 175/210 (removed 35) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 103 cols
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 422 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 632 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/201 places, 175/402 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1263 ms. Remains : 103/201 places, 175/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11413218985956774774.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5023627573687179664.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11413218985956774774.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5023627573687179664.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,41740,0.454457,23368,2,11798,5,63778,6,0,590,39800,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p3_4_1==0) * EG(((p3_3_0==0)||(cs_2_3==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p3_4_1==0)),((p3_3_0==0)||(cs_2_3==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 171/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,3.18395,117940,1,0,9,533111,20,3,3483,126413,9
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 177 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 177 transition count 258
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 177 /201 variables (removed 24) and now considering 258/402 (removed 144) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 258 rows 177 cols
[2025-05-29 18:01:31] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:01:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:01:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 439 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 601 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 252 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:01:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-29 18:01:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 6/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 258/435 variables, 177/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 30/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 5/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/435 variables, 1/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 1/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 435/435 variables, and 244 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 22/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 258/435 variables, 177/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 30/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 252/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 435/435 variables, and 496 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 177/177 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60136ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60138ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 177/201 places, 258/402 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60746 ms. Remains : 177/201 places, 258/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 258 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3698470088125364195.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-29 18:02:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9979300483492289691.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3698470088125364195.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9979300483492289691.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.32043e+06,7.81694,239400,2,47299,5,705228,6,0,969,516861,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-29 18:03:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:03:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7532830618699398115.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7532830618699398115.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7532830618699398115.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7532830618699398115.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7532830618699398115.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:03:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:03:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:03:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 314 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 120 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:03:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12029109965019810318.gal : 22 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6452411087059593446.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12029109965019810318.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6452411087059593446.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.32043e+06,5.80519,141356,4762,1155,100252,7488,671,1.21157e+06,334,8994,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((i5.u10.p2_1_4==0)) + E(((EG((A((u0.cs_2_4==0) U ((i1.i0.u25.p2_1_5==0)||(i1.i1.u7.ncs_0_2==1))) * (i1.i1.u35.p1_3_5==1))) * (i2.u11....541
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(((EG((!((E(!(((i1.i0.u25.p2_1_5==0)||(i1.i1.u7.ncs_0_2==1))) U (!((u0.cs_2_4==0)) * !(((i1.i0...832
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t224, t225, t226, t227, t228, t231, t233, t234, t239, t240, t241, t242, t243, t244, t247, t25...671
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 172 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 172 transition count 273
Applied a total of 58 rules in 12 ms. Remains 172 /201 variables (removed 29) and now considering 273/402 (removed 129) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 172 cols
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 262 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 268 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/201 places, 273/402 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 171 /171 variables (removed 0) and now considering 273/273 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 284 ms. Remains : 171/201 places, 273/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3957852082998777138.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9730982772802163485.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3957852082998777138.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9730982772802163485.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.16328e+06,2.12508,80324,2,25591,5,234528,6,0,960,178185,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((p2_1_4==1) + (((ncs_3_4==0) * ((ncs_4_1==1) + (AX((p3_2_2==1)) * ((p3_1_2==0)||(ncs_0_0==1))))) * ((cs_4_1==1)||(p2_4_5==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p2_1_4==1) + (((ncs_3_4==0) * ((ncs_4_1==1) + (!(EX(!((p3_2_2==1)))) * ((p3_1...224
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t237, t238, t239, t240, t241, t242, t243, t244, t245, t246, t247, t248, t249, t250, t251, t25...378
(forward)formula 0,0,18.2424,566144,1,0,543,2.43592e+06,573,293,7071,1.05268e+06,588
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 201 transition count 373
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 172 transition count 373
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 141 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 141 transition count 212
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 140 transition count 211
Applied a total of 122 rules in 23 ms. Remains 140 /201 variables (removed 61) and now considering 211/402 (removed 191) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 140 cols
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 194 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 194 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 139/201 places, 211/402 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 139 transition count 175
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 103 transition count 175
Applied a total of 72 rules in 6 ms. Remains 103 /139 variables (removed 36) and now considering 175/211 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 103 cols
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 191 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 276 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/201 places, 175/402 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 506 ms. Remains : 103/201 places, 175/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11170476672564551687.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10033767957000465174.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11170476672564551687.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10033767957000465174.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,46070,0.546537,24148,2,11419,5,71047,6,0,590,45408,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((p1_4_8==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((p1_4_8==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t109, t110, t111, t112, t113, t114, t115, t116, t117, t118, t119, t120, t121, t122, t123, t12...378
(forward)formula 0,0,6.15333,167012,1,0,391,830886,377,181,4813,343352,361
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 171 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 171 transition count 242
Applied a total of 60 rules in 4 ms. Remains 171 /201 variables (removed 30) and now considering 242/402 (removed 160) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 171 cols
[2025-05-29 18:03:57] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 154 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/201 places, 242/402 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 242/242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 160 ms. Remains : 170/201 places, 242/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 242 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1806891223308878843.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:03:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12329695711635450454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1806891223308878843.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12329695711635450454.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00676e+06,1.55052,59436,2,24577,5,179243,6,0,925,138101,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(((cs_3_4==0)&&(p1_0_7==1))) * (EG((p2_2_2==0)) + ((p1_1_2==0)&&(p3_1_2==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((cs_3_4==0)&&(p1_0_7==1)))))),(p2_2_2==0))] != FALSE + [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((cs_3_4=...217
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t69, t70, t71, t74, t75, t76, t77, t80, t81, t82, t83, t86, t87, t88, t89, t92, t93, t94, t95...513
(forward)formula 0,0,20.5388,488968,1,0,519,2.20325e+06,515,248,6539,1.08787e+06,498
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 171 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 171 transition count 252
Applied a total of 60 rules in 9 ms. Remains 171 /201 variables (removed 30) and now considering 252/402 (removed 150) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 252 rows 171 cols
[2025-05-29 18:04:18] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 148 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/201 places, 252/402 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 170 /170 variables (removed 0) and now considering 252/252 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 159 ms. Remains : 170/201 places, 252/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 252 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5572097201962255244.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality222361571327438106.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5572097201962255244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality222361571327438106.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.02562e+06,1.4165,54456,2,26922,5,168483,6,0,935,126402,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(!(((p1_5_0==0)||(p3_4_5==1))) U AG(EX(((cs_5_2==0)||(ncs_5_2==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(((p1_5_0==0)||(p3_4_5==1))) U !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((cs_5_2==0)||(ncs_5_2==1)))))))))] = FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t90, t91, t92, t93, t94, t96, t97, t98, t99...515
(forward)formula 0,0,24.5532,686040,1,0,567,3.64293e+06,530,280,6770,1.47446e+06,577
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 169 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 169 transition count 240
Applied a total of 64 rules in 3 ms. Remains 169 /201 variables (removed 32) and now considering 240/402 (removed 162) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 240 rows 169 cols
[2025-05-29 18:04:43] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 136 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 168/201 places, 240/402 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 168 /168 variables (removed 0) and now considering 240/240 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 140 ms. Remains : 168/201 places, 240/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 240 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9021730320094366291.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:04:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16446399018682696854.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9021730320094366291.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16446399018682696854.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,911670,1.09393,40808,2,21008,5,122081,6,0,915,83336,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(AF(EX(EF((cs_4_4==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(EX(E(TRUE U (cs_4_4==1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t204, t205, t206, t207, t208, t209, t210, t211, t212, t213, t214, t215, t216, t217, t218, t21...378
(forward)formula 0,1,17.92,430668,1,0,521,2.02214e+06,508,266,6617,966629,548
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 170 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 170 transition count 241
Applied a total of 62 rules in 8 ms. Remains 170 /201 variables (removed 31) and now considering 241/402 (removed 161) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 170 cols
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 146 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 169/201 places, 241/402 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 169 /169 variables (removed 0) and now considering 241/241 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 156 ms. Remains : 169/201 places, 241/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1750645726110132173.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6079414030572823146.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1750645726110132173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6079414030572823146.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,968261,1.11119,44308,2,21589,5,136606,6,0,920,99237,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(AF(((p1_1_3==0)||(next_3==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(((p1_1_3==0)||(next_3==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t70, t71, t82, t83, t88, t89, t94, t95, t100, t101, t110, t205, t206, t207, t208, t209, t210,...436
(forward)formula 0,1,21.8656,607384,1,0,631,3.09626e+06,509,299,6458,1.20096e+06,667
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 170 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 170 transition count 241
Applied a total of 62 rules in 2 ms. Remains 170 /201 variables (removed 31) and now considering 241/402 (removed 161) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 170 cols
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 150 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 169/201 places, 241/402 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 169 /169 variables (removed 0) and now considering 241/241 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 154 ms. Remains : 169/201 places, 241/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6244220691245518839.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15670368928409390552.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6244220691245518839.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15670368928409390552.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,962261,1.51975,48580,2,22622,5,151234,6,0,920,108209,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((p1_2_8==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((p1_2_8==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t69, t70, t71, t75, t76, t77, t87, t88, t89, t93, t94, t95, t99, t100, t101, t114, t205, t206...461
(forward)formula 0,1,16.9524,431928,1,0,503,1.87894e+06,498,244,6363,869434,489
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 170 transition count 251
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 170 transition count 251
Applied a total of 62 rules in 3 ms. Remains 170 /201 variables (removed 31) and now considering 251/402 (removed 151) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 251 rows 170 cols
[2025-05-29 18:05:41] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 144 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 145 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 169/201 places, 251/402 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 169 /169 variables (removed 0) and now considering 251/251 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 150 ms. Remains : 169/201 places, 251/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 251 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13278711368196754780.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:05:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14895330619392898198.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13278711368196754780.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14895330619392898198.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,987636,1.3906,51980,2,23192,5,161766,6,0,930,119007,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(((p3_4_2!=1) + EX((ncs_2_4!=0)))) * EF((p2_1_2!=0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((p3_4_2!=1) + EX((ncs_2_4!=0)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p2_1_2!=0...169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t215, t216, t217, t218, t219, t220, t221, t222, t223, t224, t225, t226, t227, t228, t229, t23...378
(forward)formula 0,1,25.1826,633248,1,0,520,3.34987e+06,531,272,6823,1.34964e+06,552
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 402/402 transitions.
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 201 transition count 373
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 172 transition count 373
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 141 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 141 transition count 212
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 140 transition count 211
Applied a total of 122 rules in 16 ms. Remains 140 /201 variables (removed 61) and now considering 211/402 (removed 191) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 140 cols
[2025-05-29 18:06:07] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 138 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 139/201 places, 211/402 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 139 transition count 175
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 103 transition count 175
Applied a total of 72 rules in 4 ms. Remains 103 /139 variables (removed 36) and now considering 175/211 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 103 cols
[2025-05-29 18:06:07] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-05-29 18:06:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-29 18:06:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 189 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 266 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 103/201 places, 175/402 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 424 ms. Remains : 103/201 places, 175/402 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 175 transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10213347147564762342.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12010741522500825436.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10213347147564762342.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12010741522500825436.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,46070,0.494538,24092,2,11419,5,71047,6,0,590,45408,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p1_4_8==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p1_4_8==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 173/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,3.4177,120072,1,0,8,541821,19,2,3480,143053,8
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12824158600949974772.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12824158600949974772.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12824158600949974772.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12824158600949974772.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12824158600949974772.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 658 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12438053170836083613.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-29 18:06:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9003253413885388363.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12438053170836083613.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9003253413885388363.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.82597e+06,10.7754,227900,7426,2014,375343,5975,1017,461435,435,4644,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((i5.u27.p2_1_4==0)) + E(((EG((A((u0.cs_2_4==0) U ((i1.u9.p2_1_5==0)||(i3.u6.ncs_0_2==1))) * (i1.u35.p1_3_5==1))) * (i6.u28.p1_2_0==1)...521
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(((EG((!((E(!(((i1.u9.p2_1_5==0)||(i3.u6.ncs_0_2==1))) U (!((u0.cs_2_4==0)) * !(((i1.u9.p2_1_5...798
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, ...1725
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,109.607,2228228,1,0,4.4463e+06,113139,2927,3.39163e+06,1346,399328,1062590
FORMULA Anderson-PT-06-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 498299 ms.

BK_STOP 1748542081790

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Anderson-PT-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Anderson-PT-06, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r002-tall-174853728700161"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Anderson-PT-06.tgz
mv Anderson-PT-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;