About the Execution of LTSMin+red for MedleyA-PT-22
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
615.619 | 33984.00 | 95977.00 | 608.70 | F | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r590-smll-171734924900108.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is MedleyA-PT-22, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r590-smll-171734924900108
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 692K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 2 16:33 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 145K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Jun 2 16:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 238K Jun 2 16:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
FORMULA_NAME StableMarking
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717352932272
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=MedleyA-PT-22
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-02 18:28:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -timeout, 180, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-02 18:28:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-02 18:28:55] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 177 ms
[2024-06-02 18:28:55] [INFO ] Transformed 307 places.
[2024-06-02 18:28:55] [INFO ] Transformed 740 transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:28:55] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-02 18:28:55] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 307 places and 740 transitions and 3829 arcs in 355 ms.
Structural test allowed to assert that 48 places are NOT stable. Took 28 ms.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1169 resets) in 3412 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 154/259 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 154/154 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 740 rows 307 cols
[2024-06-02 18:28:56] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 42 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 154/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 82/236 variables, 9/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 82/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/1047 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 5093 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 236/307 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/307 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 154/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 82/236 variables, 9/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 82/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 10/246 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 10/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/1047 variables, and 256 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 5024 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 246/307 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/307 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/154 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10423ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 154 out of 307 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 307/307 places, 740/740 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1184 edges and 307 vertex of which 300 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.10 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 26 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 26 transitions
Performed 26 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 300 transition count 710
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 274 transition count 707
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 274 transition count 704
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 271 transition count 704
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 253 transition count 683
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 253 transition count 683
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 250 transition count 680
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 250 transition count 680
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 227 transition count 657
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 224 transition count 654
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 224 transition count 654
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -13
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 221 transition count 667
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 221 transition count 664
Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 221 transition count 658
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 215 transition count 658
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 4 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 215 transition count 666
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 211 transition count 666
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 211 transition count 666
Applied a total of 190 rules in 449 ms. Remains 211 /307 variables (removed 96) and now considering 666/740 (removed 74) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 472 ms. Remains : 211/307 places, 666/740 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (725283 resets) in 49539 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 1/154 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000003 steps (107423 resets) in 6790 ms. (589 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 666 rows 211 cols
[2024-06-02 18:29:23] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 11 ms
[2024-06-02 18:29:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 133 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 40/41 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 13/54 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/139 variables, 7/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 65/204 variables, 10/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 6/210 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 666/876 variables, 210/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/876 variables, 133/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/876 variables, 0/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/877 variables, 1/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/877 variables, 0/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/877 variables, 0/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 877/877 variables, and 367 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 533 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 211/211 constraints, ReadFeed: 133/133 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 40/41 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 13/54 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/139 variables, 7/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 65/204 variables, 10/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 386 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 400 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 6/210 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 666/876 variables, 210/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/876 variables, 133/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/876 variables, 1/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/876 variables, 0/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/877 variables, 1/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/877 variables, 0/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/877 variables, 0/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 877/877 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1383 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 211/211 constraints, ReadFeed: 133/133 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1959ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 45 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 211 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 666/666 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 211 transition count 639
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 184 transition count 633
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 140 transition count 577
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 140 transition count 577
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 122 transition count 517
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 122 transition count 517
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 190 place count 116 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 116 transition count 502
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 113 transition count 493
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 113 transition count 493
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 101 transition count 481
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 98 transition count 475
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 98 transition count 475
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -18
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 95 transition count 493
Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 95 transition count 483
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 85 transition count 483
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 264 place count 79 transition count 441
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 79 transition count 441
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 9 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 79 transition count 556
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 70 transition count 538
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 70 transition count 536
Applied a total of 308 rules in 160 ms. Remains 70 /211 variables (removed 141) and now considering 536/666 (removed 130) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 161 ms. Remains : 70/211 places, 536/666 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 70638 steps (13842 resets) in 2251 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Able to resolve query StableMarking after proving 260 properties.
FORMULA StableMarking FALSE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK MARKED_SUFFIX_TEST TOPOLOGICAL
Total runtime 31482 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout
BK_STOP 1717352966256
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -timeout 180 -rebuildPNML
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="MedleyA-PT-22"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is MedleyA-PT-22, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r590-smll-171734924900108"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/MedleyA-PT-22.tgz
mv MedleyA-PT-22 execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property StableMarking.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;