fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r586-smll-171734923900108
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for MedleyA-PT-22

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
556.460 37982.00 111088.00 235.10 F normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r586-smll-171734923900108.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is MedleyA-PT-22, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r586-smll-171734923900108
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 692K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 2 16:33 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 145K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Jun 2 16:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 238K Jun 2 16:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME StableMarking

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717352812205

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=MedleyA-PT-22
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-02 18:26:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -timeout, 180, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-02 18:26:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-02 18:26:55] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 266 ms
[2024-06-02 18:26:55] [INFO ] Transformed 307 places.
[2024-06-02 18:26:55] [INFO ] Transformed 740 transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:26:55] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-02 18:26:55] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 307 places and 740 transitions and 3829 arcs in 570 ms.
Structural test allowed to assert that 48 places are NOT stable. Took 30 ms.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1165 resets) in 4121 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 161/259 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 161/161 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 740 rows 307 cols
[2024-06-02 18:26:57] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 29 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 161/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 86/247 variables, 9/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 86/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s6 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s7 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s8 0.0)
(s10 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s11 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s12 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s13 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s14 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s15 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s16 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s17 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s18 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s19 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s20 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s21 0.0)
(s25 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s26 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s27 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s28 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s31 0.0)
(s32 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s33 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s34 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s35 (/ 4.0 7.0))
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s39 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s40 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s41 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s42 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s48 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s49 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s50 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s51 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s52 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s53 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s55 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s58 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 (/ 1.0 56.0))
(s72 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 247/1047 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 5074 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 247/307 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/307 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 161/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 86/247 variables, 9/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 86/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 10/257 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 10/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 50/307 variables, 13/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 50/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 519 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 10713ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 161 out of 307 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 307/307 places, 740/740 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1184 edges and 307 vertex of which 300 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.10 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 300 transition count 711
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 275 transition count 708
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 275 transition count 705
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 272 transition count 705
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 257 transition count 688
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 257 transition count 688
Performed 25 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 232 transition count 663
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 229 transition count 660
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 229 transition count 660
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -10
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 227 transition count 670
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 227 transition count 666
Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 227 transition count 660
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 221 transition count 660
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 221 transition count 667
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 218 transition count 667
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 218 transition count 667
Applied a total of 175 rules in 393 ms. Remains 218 /307 variables (removed 89) and now considering 667/740 (removed 73) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 415 ms. Remains : 218/307 places, 667/740 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (595287 resets) in 38223 ms. (104 steps per ms) remains 3/161 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000003 steps (93226 resets) in 7251 ms. (551 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000001 steps (93129 resets) in 6691 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000004 steps (93100 resets) in 6928 ms. (577 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-06-02 18:27:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 643 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 643 rows 218 cols
[2024-06-02 18:27:23] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-06-02 18:27:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 119 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 83/85 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/108 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 48/156 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 58/214 variables, 9/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 3/217 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 643/860 variables, 217/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/860 variables, 119/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/860 variables, 0/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/861 variables, 1/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/861 variables, 0/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/861 variables, 0/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 861/861 variables, and 360 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 624 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, ReadFeed: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 83/85 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/108 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 48/156 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 58/214 variables, 9/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 160 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 155 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/217 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 643/860 variables, 217/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/860 variables, 119/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/860 variables, 2/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 189 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 130 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/860 variables, 2/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/860 variables, 0/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/861 variables, 1/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/861 variables, 0/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/861 variables, 0/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 861/861 variables, and 366 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1442 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, ReadFeed: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 2098ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 145 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 667/667 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 218 transition count 640
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 191 transition count 635
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 146 transition count 577
Iterating global reduction 2 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 146 transition count 577
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 125 transition count 515
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 125 transition count 515
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 197 place count 119 transition count 500
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 119 transition count 500
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 116 transition count 491
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 116 transition count 491
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 103 transition count 478
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 238 place count 100 transition count 473
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 100 transition count 473
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -22
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 97 transition count 495
Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 97 transition count 487
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 89 transition count 487
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 269 place count 83 transition count 445
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 83 transition count 445
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 11 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 83 transition count 495
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 72 transition count 486
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 310 place count 72 transition count 482
Applied a total of 310 rules in 160 ms. Remains 72 /218 variables (removed 146) and now considering 482/667 (removed 185) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 160 ms. Remains : 72/218 places, 482/667 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1077080 steps (205619 resets) in 11494 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Able to resolve query StableMarking after proving 260 properties.
FORMULA StableMarking FALSE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK MARKED_SUFFIX_TEST BESTFIRST_WALK TOPOLOGICAL
Total runtime 35312 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout

BK_STOP 1717352850187

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -timeout 180 -rebuildPNML

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="MedleyA-PT-22"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is MedleyA-PT-22, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r586-smll-171734923900108"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/MedleyA-PT-22.tgz
mv MedleyA-PT-22 execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property StableMarking.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' StableMarking.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;